Component structure browser - view highlighted

Hello Experts,
In the component browser, I have a view that has been enhanced. This view is now highlighted blue (ie there is a box around the view name), and I am unsure why. Several other views have been enhanced but does not show this behavior.
Please advise.
Thanks,
AYeung

HI AYeung,
I assume, your view in BSP_WD_CMPWB.
If there are more than 1 enhancement set, then if you open in 1 enh set, then the views enhanced with other enh set is grayed out. The same applies if you choose no enh set.
Hope this helps.
Satish

Similar Messages

Cost Component Structure - expand or further second view

Hello experts,
I have a cost component structure with 40 elements. Now I need 5 further elements, but without changing existent variable / fix components.
One idea is to build a 2nd component structure as "cost component split". But how I implement a second view, what are the steps watching the other structure in customer calculation, or CO PA?
Thanks for help!
Regards Juergen

Oh yes, I forgot about the Limit... You can check for any available OSS notes.,.
As far as I know, the upper cap is 40 and SAP does not allow more.. It makes sense to me that having cost components more than that is difficult to handle
Can you think of revamping your CCS?
br, Ajay M

Goofy Cover Browser view in iTunes 7

I guess Apple’s relationship with Disney finally got to close for comfort. I’m afraid Goofy just took over the iTunes UI design.
As the name implies, the Cover Browser (rightmost view button) looks and almost functions like a browser.
Unfortunately, it is merely a display of the album now playing with previous and next albums.
Undoubtedly this view is great looking, but has no usefulness as a browser. This should have been a visualizer plugin.
As a matter of fact, I actually would use it as a full screen visualizer plugin. Ironically, such useful Use Case for this feature is not enabled.
So far, I was only slightly disappointed with the missed opportunity to make a cool looking real album browser and the missing visualizer.
Apple did provide a “Group by Artwork” view that is not as great looking, but it’s certainly useful.
However, my disappointment quickly turned into puzzlement when I was surprised by a completely unexpected Cover Browser behavior.
I hear that after puzzlement comes acceptance. I’m not there yet, but I have a feeling I’m working up to it by writing about it.
Consider this.
If you filter your view with Quick Browse by an Artist or a Genre, only the filtered tracks are displayed.
If you start playback, only those selected tracks will be in the queue.
I don’t know about you, but that’s how I listen to my iTunes library. I play a selected Playlist, Genre, Album, or Artist to listen to a specific selection. I never play tracks without filtering because I have podcasts, audiobooks, hip-hop, classic, altrock, and only God and my iTunes library know how many more different types of music.
But I digress. Having started playback on a filtered list of a selected Artist or Album and then clicking on the Cover Browser does something only Goofy could have conceived.
It loses your selected filtering and changes to an all tracks view. The currently playing album cover is displayed, but what is before and after that track is now determined by the all tracks view column sorting.
In other words, because I clicked on the Cover Browser view, my playback queue changed to something I had no intention of hearing.
This strange behavior is unique to the Cover Browser view. Had I click on the Group by Artwork instead, the filtering would still be in effect.
There must have been some kind of crazy rational to lose the filtering since it was clearly intentional.
They got the Playlist behavior right. If playback is started from a Playlist, changing view to Cover Browser does the expected and only displays the albums contained in the Playlist.
Goofy didn’t stop there. No, he was inspired.
In the Cover Browsing view while playback is active, if you navigate down the list of tracks, say 6000 tracks down, after a brief timeout, the highlighted album reverts back to the one playing, which could the first one of this 6000 tracks list.
Quick, you got 15 seconds to navigate down a list and look at it…Sorry, you’re not fast enough…back to the top of the list where you belong!
I’m afraid this is not the first time iTunes has been updated with functionality that makes it less useful. Podcast categories have been removed with no good way to get to those specific podcasts anymore (e.g. International).
The status window defaulting to downloading podcast information while playback is active is another terrible example.
As a lifetime fan, it is sad to witness the slow deterioration of Apple’s once high standards.
Acceptance is coming while I image what must be like to have Goofy lose and running amuck in the Tunes design lab.

Below the cover view is the track listing which has all the columns as usual - simply click the column title to sort by that field.
If the album has different artists then make sure the 'group compilations' option is ticked in preferences and then go into the info for the tracks and select 'part of a compilation'. iTunes will then group the tracks into a single album and display 'various artists' as the artist.
There is also now a field called 'album artist' which sets an artist for an entire album.
Powerbook G4 12" Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Cost Component Structure (OKTZ) Issue - Max number of cost fields reached

Hello.
I'm having this issue in OKTZ when adding new cost component in an exisiting cost component structure. it says "maximum number of cost fields reached (40)".
not sure what to do with this.
please see screenshot
http://img39.imageshack.us/img39/1700/oktz.jpg

Hi Andrew,
When yo create the Cost Components in the Cost Component Structure, inside each Cost Component, there will be properties relating to whether the Cost in that Cost Component is Fixed / Variable, relevant to Inventory Valuation or not etc.
To view these options...Go to OKTZ, select the line of your Cost Component Structure, double click on "Cost Component with Attributes" in the left side navigation. Now, you will be able to see the list Cost Components on right hand side. If you double click on any Cost Component, you will see the properties of that Cost Component.
There, you can see ther radio buttons "Variable Costs" and "Fixed and Variable Costs".
Now, in Standard SAP, you will be able to create a maximum 40 Cost Components. The behaviour of the system goes like this.... If one Cost Component is only "Variable Cost", it will take the space of one Cost Component out of the maximum 40. If one Cost Component is of "Fixed and Variable Costs", then it will take the space of two Cost Components out of the maximum 40. That means, if all of your Cost Components are "Fixed and Variable", then you will be able to create only 20 Cost Components.
You can find the SAP explanation regarding this in the IMG Documentation...
SPROControllingProduct Cost ControllingProduct Cost PlanningBasic Settings for Material Costing--Define Cost Component Structure. Check the IMG Documentation there to find the following text...
Structure of the Cost Components in a Cost Component Split
The cost components are listed in a cost component structure that can contain up to 40 cost components (cost fields).
You can create up to 40 cost components that contain variable costs.
For cost components that contain full costs, the system creates a second cost field for the fixed costs. This means that you can create no more than 20 cost components that are full costs.
Revert back for further explanation...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Is Structure Layout View a code smell?

I have an application that was built by using a double layered architecture. I needed to have a model where I store essential data about actions in this system.
This system must be able to display these actions on screen and needs to be in a Composite type fashion(an action can contain sub-actions, but also can contain other components like buttons, labels, etc.).
The structure model holds data and structure about actions(but not their positioning). The layout model is an observer of the logic model and holds the position and z-order of all components(actions + buttons + labels + etc.). And lastly there is the View that is an observer of the logic model and of the layout model to be able to display all the components(actions, buttons, etc.).
By doing this I've separated an action into three components(structure+layout+view). This separation was necessary because I wanted to have a layer where I make the decision of which component is under the cursor separated from the layer where I make structural decisions(like adding/deleting actions) and separated from the layer where I display all components. Now I have three layers that combined form one unique component.
The problem with this is that a component becomes formed from three distinct layers and it is a little harder to mantain.
Please tell me if there could be a better design for this problem.
Thanks in advance

The following applies mainly to PHP and web pages, but the principles are the same: http://www.phpwact.org/pattern/template_view.
You want a series of template-generating classes. One option in doing so would be an event model:
interface TemplateComponent {
   abstract public void render(final JComponent parent);
class TemplateManager {
   private TemplateComponent header;
   private TemplateComponent body;
   private TemplateComponent footer;
   public TemplateManager(TemplateComponent header, TemplateComponent body, TemplateComponent footer) {
       super();
       this.header = header;
       this.body = body;
       this.footer = footer;
   public void render() {
       JComponent panelHeader;
       JComponent panelBody;
       JComponent panelFooter;
        // Create a series of JComponent and add to your layout
       // This will be the template layout
      header.render(headerPanel);
      body.render(bodyPanel);
      footer.render(footerPanel);
}- Saish

Cost component structure

Dear forum,
May I know what is cost component structure? Where I can see this?
Thanks
Moderator: Please, search before posting

Dear,
Cost Component structure contains bifurcation of Various Cost, Such As;
1. RM
2. Processing
3. Depreciation..etc..
you can view this in SPRO>IMG>Controlling>Product Cost Controlling>Product Cost Planning>Basic Setting for Material Costing> Define Cost Component Structure (OKTZ)
Br,Vivek

Activity types&Cost Component Structure?

Hello All,
I would like to ask following**
*Can production cost centers have three activity types Produced Quantity, Machine Hour, Labor hour? Will the confirmation of these tree act types on work center form Production Cost of Material. Question is regarding line whish will have name Production Cost in Cost Component structure /OKTZ/*
Can only Primary Cost Component Split for Preliminary Costing be set and will it be visualized as itemization during precosting in CK11N? Which assignments regarding this have to be done?**
Best Regards,
Poly P**

Hi
I guess you need to educate your users a bit as to how the costing works as well as what is possible in SAP
Having these many itemizations is neither possble, nor recommended
The expenses like Discounts, Maintenance, Supporting costs etc are intended for analysis at Trial balance level.... These things are overheads from costing point of view.... So, you need to logically group them
Material consumption cost is very much possible provided the material components are part of the BOM
Direct Costs like Labor, electricity - you need to be create activity type for them.. ANd maintain a plan rate in KP26 for the same... You can not show original cost element in itemization for them
Other costs mentioned by you are indirect costs - Which are absorbed as overheads... Either as a % of other costs (Material + labor + electrivity) or as a rate per hr of Labor, etc
Regards
Ajay M

How can I restore to the Browser View of Book, several missing photo's?

Ten photos are missing from the Browser View of the Book. The photos show up in the Photo View and are checked as being used. They also show up in the working screen view of the book. All other photos in the book show up. Why are the 10 missing? How can I restore just those photos and not all photos for that book? What difference would it make in sending that book to the printer?

Ten photos are missing from the Browser View of the Book. The photos show up in the Photo View and are checked as being used. They also show up in the working screen view of the book.
I'm not sure of your question
Are you saying that when you view the thumbnails of the book at the top or the screen that some pages do not show the photos even though they are in the book below?
If so that is a minor bug in iPhoto '09 - you can ignore it - it is just a display issue -- I forget exactly how but you can force a refresh of the book thumbnails - maybe double clicking on the book page - or maybe on the thumbnail
But in any case your book is fine (you should preview it before sending - http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1040 )
LN

Standard Report for Materials Cost Component Structure - PO Condition Type

Dear experts,
We are using below cost component structure (CCS) for materials:
- Direct materials
- import duty
- import handling
In which, all those above CCS are achieved through below condition type in Purchasing Info Record. When doing the standard cost estimate through costing run, we have successfully grouped all those condition types into their respective CCS. The problem is, while executing the standard report of "result of costing run" (S_ALR_87099930), the sytem groups all those three CCS into CCS "Direct materials" only.
I have tried different standard layouts, but still got no way to show all those CCS separately in the standard report.
Please kindly suggest what approach should i take
Thank you very much
BR, Erwin
@edit
Solved.
Edited by: Erwin Hartono on Nov 16, 2011 9:16 AM

Hi
Check cost elements assigned to structure. For this go to transaction code OKTZ and select your CCS and double click on Assignment Cost Component-Cost element interval.
Srinivas

Design view and browser view in DW are different than when I view from local folder

I'm brand new to Dreamweaver CS5.5 and here is my problem:
I've made an html page in dreamweaver with a banner, with an additional graphic and some text on top of the banner. It displays just fine in every browser when I view from the local folder, but when I open DW and view, it displays incorrectly in all three design, live and browser views within DW. If I make changes to the css file until it views correctly in design view, it no longer displays correctly from the local folder and it still doesn't view correctly in live or browser view within DW. If what I'm doing isnt going to display accurately in any of the views provided by Dreamweaver as compared to the live server, whats the point in having this software? I could just keep building webpages in notepad and uploading with CoreFTP.
Any suggestions? Is it some setting that I dont know about that I need to change within DW? Please help.

align="center" is deprecated (obsolete) code in XHTML & HTML5 doc types. Instead of styling markup with HTML, you should be using CSS.
CSS
.center {text-align:center}
HTML
<p class="center">some centered text here</p>
With respect to break tags, in XHTML doc types the correct syntax is <br /> not <br>. However your usage of line breaks is inconsistent with good symantic markup. Use headings <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> for important keywords. Use <p> for descriptive paragraphs. Use <ul> <li> or <ol> <li> for lists. Line breaks should be used minimally if ever.
XHTML doc types require all tags to be lowercase. Uppercase tags will throw errors.
Your design is too rigid. When text size is increased in browsers, your content is unreadable. See screenshot.
SOLUTIONS:
1) DO NOT USE POSITION ABSOLUTE. You don't need it. Absolute positioning removes content from the normal document flow resulting in a jumbled mess. Use default CSS positioning (none) with margins, padding & floats to align elements.
2) Remove HEIGHT values from all CSS containers. Height limits a container's capacity to hold more content when needed. Container height should always be determined by the amount of content it holds; not explicit values. If required to reveal a background image, for example, use CSS min-height instead of height.
CSS Box Model
http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_boxmodel.asp
CSS Floats
http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_class_float.asp
CSS min-height
http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/pr_dim_min-height.asp
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb
http://alt-web.blogspot.com/

Why is my page not centered in browser view?

I am working on my home page. I set the container dimension to 700px and max width 960. I have tried other sizes. every time in Windows browser view my site shifts to the left with a large margin on the right. I can't get it to center. I have an error message saying :
Unsupported property: max-width
Affects: Internet Explorer 6.0; Internet Explorer for Macintosh 5.2
In Live View, it looks fine. Also, in browser view, my spry menu bar is not showing up (it does in Live View).
Anyone have any suggestions??
Thanks! M.

kcusu wrote:
.container {
width: 700px; /* the auto value on the sides, coupled with the width, centers the layout */
background-color: #FFFFCE;
max-width: 960px;
text-align: center;
margin-top: 0;
margin-right: auto;
margin-bottom: 0;
margin-left: auto;
If this is the real code, your CSS is missing a closing bracket }
It would be soooooo much simpler and quicker for everyone if you would upload your page to your remote web space and post a link for us to see it in our browsers.
My guess is that your code has validation errors that need fixing.
Code Validation Tools
CSS - http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
HTML - http://validator.w3.org/
FYI: Browser compatibility checking is a total waste of time. You can skip that feature b/c it doesn't tell you anything useful.
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb

Cost Component structure field and table names

Hey all,
i need to code a BADI to push value of one column in cost component structure to another column in ccs for only order settlements..
any idea how to do this??
i am very new to abap please take it easy on ur answer..
i coulndt even find in which table and fields these values are stored...
thank you

I have an OSS note, it tells you step by step how to config the badi u need.. but does not mention about the logic u ll use.. it is up to you....
so i need to find the field names and tell take these and post them to these columns...
i dont know if i make any sence, but this is all i need to do...
so i have the body i have the logic but i dunno the import and export fields...
i believe the table is ckmlkeph.... and field that populate the columns are kst0XX, but i cannot see the field name and table name if i select a line in the column and F1 ????

Double clicking an image in Browser view

I see that the behavior for double clicking an image in Browser view has changed between Aperture 2 & 3. In version 2, double clicking an image would jump from Browser view to zoom in on that image in full screen mode. Now in version 3, double clicking just switches to that image in Viewer mode in the main window, without entering into full screen mode.
While I guess this change makes some sense given the changes to full screen mode in v.3, my old fingers have gotten used to doing things the old way. To recreate what I used to do in v.2 I need to double click, then hit 'F' to do to full screen mode and then do the reverse to get back where I started.
Is there anyway I can change this behavior to the old v.2 way? I see lots of ways to customize hotkeys and commands, but nothing to change behaviors for a double click.
Thanks!

I can't find anything, but I'm still finding my way around!
I don't think you need to double click and press F..... just pressing F should change views.
Another way is to drag the "Full Screen" icon into the toolbar, and you can just click that.

Excel Named Items not showing up in Browser View Options list

Hi,
Using excel 2013 - when I create named ranges under the 'formulas' tab, I expect to see them show up in the 'show' tab under Browser View options. However they aren't there - when I look at the 'items in the workbook' list I only see the charts and
pivot tables in my workbook, not the named items.
Is there some setting I need to flip on to see these times (and then use them in sharepoint)?
Thanks

Today, I tried it again and now I could see the Name range under Browser View Options list, this is my step as below:
1. Type the value in Cell A1 to B4. (Same as the screenshot as the last reply)
2. Directly type Test in Name Box.
3. Go to File > Info > Browser View options > Items in the Workbook.
Now the Name is appearing.
But when we define a name to a blank range, we would not see the Name in the Browser View options anymore. Try in your site.
By the way, My using version is Office 36 ProPlus, version 15.0.4551.1005.
Cheers,
Tony Chen
Forum Support
Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
If you have any feedback on our support, please contact
[email protected]

All "Site Content and Structure" default views incorrectly showing "There are no items to show in this view"

Hi All,
On my SharePoint Online site (Office 365) all my “Site Content and Structure” default views are showing “There are no items to show in this view”. For example the “Checked out To Me” view shows “There are no items to show in this view” (shown in screenshot
below). I know this is incorrect and should show at least ten items that have been checked out to me for over two months. I am also a member of the Site Collection Administration and Owner groups.
What I am trying to do is view all the "Checked Out items" within a Site Collection including it's sub-sites.
Is there a feature that needs to be activated to get the correct information from the “Site Content and Structure” default views?
I hope you can help
Colin

Hi Colin,
As I understand, all “Site Content and Structure” default views are showing “There are no items to show in this view” in your SharePoint online site.
Check things below:
1. Go to site content and structure logs in site setting to check if there is correct information.
2. Create a new site collection to check if there are items in Site Content and Structure.
3. Switch another computer to check if it can work.
If the issue still exists, I recommend you to post it in the O365 forum.
http://community.office365.com/en-us/f/default.aspx
The reason why we recommend posting appropriately is you will get the most qualified pool of respondents, and other partners who the forums regularly can either share their knowledge or learn from your interaction with us. Thank you for your understanding.
Best regards,
Sara Fan
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Component structure browser - view highlighted

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for