Compressing prores

i have a "show" that's approx 8 hrs long that i need to compress so someone else can edit (on fcp) a trailer and other promo material that will be put up on the internet. show is 720p 59.94 apple prores 422 hq. i exported pt.1 (2 hrs) using compressor set for prores with sequence settings. looks beautiful but probably overkill. file is 175TB and took almoat 10 hrs. realize this a vague request but can someone recommend a compressor setting that will export quicker with a smaller file size, easy compatibility with fcp and yet reasonable quality for the stated purpose. thanks.

Adobe Flash CS3 (or CS4 if you're an early adopter)
Episode Pro from Flip4Mac (Telestream)

Similar Messages

  • Compressing ProRes 2K for DVD Studio and getting rough edges?

    I'm trying to get the best quality DVD burned possible working with a ProRes 2K project, original footage was 4K RED, and I'm getting rough, pixeled edges when I view the DVD. OK--Here's the workflow:
    -All RED 4K ftg has been transcoded to ProRes 2K and edited into a ProRes 2K sequence
    -I export a quicktime movie, self-contained
    -I take that quicktime into Compressor
    -I choose "Best Quality DVD 90 Minutes" setting for audio and video (AC3 and m2v)
    -In the geometry, I choose the 2.35 padding to make the aspect ratio look right (this i had to figure out by troubleshooting it myself)
    -I take those into DVD studio pro and burn them onto an SD DVD.
    When I do this with my XDCAM 1080p footage, it looks fantastic. When I do it with this project's footage, it looks like garbage. Pixels, edges are rough, just looks like low resolution. I've tried all different options of bit rate, no 2.35 padding, etc. Everything looks low res on the DVD.
    UPDATE: upon checking the quicktimes in each step, i notice the first quicktime export (the File>Export>Quicktime Movie (self-contained checked), looks fine, but the problem seems to be in the work the Compressor is doing. Any suggestions?
    Please help!
    thanks
    Jason

    Have you tried switching on Frame Controls? Experiment with some of the Frame Controls settings on a short section of the movie, particularly the Resize filter and Anti-alias / Details Level.

  • Compressing prores 422 in .fld

    Hi,
    Just been asked to do this with 6hrs worth of HDV footage. Any ideas on how to compress prores422 in .fld? I can't see a way through compressor or flip4mac??
    Any suggestion or tips would be great!
    Much Thanks, Mungo

    Adobe Flash CS3 (or CS4 if you're an early adopter)
    Episode Pro from Flip4Mac (Telestream)

  • HELP! CANON 5D MARK III TO FCP 7- WHAT IS CORRECT COMPRESSION? LINES THROUGH VIDEO-HELP!

    Hi there, so Ive just upgraded from the T2i to Canon 5D Mark III and this is the first time I'm importing footage to final cut. I have FCP 7 (Mac computer) and my video files are 1920x1080, h264 codec shot at 30 fps (29.97). Previously, when importing from the T2i, I used MPEG Streamclip to convert my video files to Apple Prores 422, and then import those compressed files into FCP 7, with field dominance being UPPER, pixels SQUARE. I never had an issue of quality loss or lines through my viewer and canvas using these settings. However, after attempting to do the same with my footage from the Mark III, I got lines through my footage. After researching a bit, I was convinced that the way to eliminate the problem was to download the 5DTORGB app for $50. This has not fixed my problem! Have tried multiple combinations of different field dominance settings and nothing is working. Is this an interlacing problem? I attempted to catch a screenshot but everytime I pause the video or take a shot, the lines do not show...I do not know what is going on! My original mov files are fine, it is only once I convert and import to final cut that they get these little lines... I am desperate for answers, please someone help!!!

    Still no change....However, I did export a trial and the vid looks fine, no lines. I guess fcp is just being a little *****! It is just really frustrating me to have to work with these lines going through my clips, even if they do not appear in my exported file....I feel that there must be some hidden issue with my sequence settings....Could you possibly provide a screenshot of the appropriate sequence settings you would use to match a 1920x1080 file with 29.97 fps (already converted from h264 to apple prores 422 thru 5DTORGB) ? I know that usually it is fine to import the newly compressed prores files, and then set sequence to match clips, but since I'm having issues, maybe setting the sequence directly would help?
    This is what my sequence settings look like right now, after being matched to my prores clip....
    I am concerned because it shows Aspect ratio as HDTV 1080i (16:9) though you have told me my clips from the 5D should be progressive (so shouldnt it be 1080p not 1080i??) Being that there is not option in frame size for 1080p, i tried selecting the "Custom (16:9)" option, but it will not allow it...Just sets it back to 1080i......Any thoughts?

  • Video quality changes when imported into Final Cut Pro

    I have video files that I have imported from an external hard drive that were transferred from an HD camera. When viewing the footage directly from the hard drive, the quality is great. Once imported into Final Cut Pro, however, there are small "flares" (don't know how else to describe them) that appear for split seconds across the screen. The best way to describe it is if you are watching a television that has an antenna, there will be static or interferance on the image. This is barely noticable but I can't determine what would cause the decline in quality. My video settings are set to DV NTSC 48 kHz and wonder if this is the problem or if anyone knows of something else that I should change prior to importing.

    Thank you so much for your help! I am technically challenged and STRUGGLING to say the least.
    Some files are definitely H.264 and I can convert them to ProRes. I also have clips that are
    DVCPRO HD 1080p25, 1,440 x 1,080 (1,888 x 1,062)
    Linear PCM, 16 bit big-endian signed integer, 2 channels, 48000 Hz
    Current Size: 1,440 × 810 pixels
    Will I need to do anything to those as well?
    Here is the question I'm afraid to ask because I think I know the answer already. Can I simply replace the clips in my sequence with the newly compressed ProRes files or do I have to change all of the video and sequence settings and then start all over?

  • Export using Compressor crashes Motion

    Motion 2.1.2
    This problem seems to have surfaced out of nowhere. When using the commandshifte command to export from Motion using Compressor, Motion crashes. Every time. Was fine yesterday and have not done any software updates since. Can export directly out of Motion (but need to do a batch). Trashed Motion and Compressor prefs and repaired permissions. Compressor fires up on its own just fine.
    Help?

    Export to Compressor using any ProRes format does not work.
    If anyone would like me to upload the project I can, but it'll be a big one if I "collect media."
    Bottom line, this workflow works in Compressor 3.0, 3.0.1,2 but not 3.0.3. It gets a strange pixelation that is unusable.
    I cannot describe my dissatisfaction with Apple right now. My business runs on FCS2 and I have had to start this project (which is on a strict timeline.. aren't they all?) from scratch because there is no way out of this bug. The forward compatibility is another issue altogether, which irritates me beyond description.
    I have noticed on these boards, that I often do some unique work and no-one experiences the "exact" same problems I encounter. I do tend to push the limits of what FCS can do, but I am not extraordinary by any means. I simply use it the way it's intended.
    Exporting from Motion, using compressor, is the best way to format my graphics for my FCP timeline as I have to export many graphic sequences that need to match my FCP sequence settings. There is no reason the "export to compressor" using a custom compression ProRes preset should result in mangled motion graphics.
    TO APPLE: Come the **** on. This is YOUR compression algorithm.
    Please if anyone has anything to add here I'm welcome to suggestions.
    Currently the only thing I can do to alleviate the problem is to roll-back to FCS/Compressor from disc and re edit my entire sequence.
    **** poor. **** poor.

  • IMovie importing and exporting slow as molasses!

    I can not figure out why it takes SO long to import and export into iMovie.
    I try to import quicktime files into iMovie in order to edit and it seems to take hours sometimes.
    Then when I'm editing it's like everything moves static and it's just not smooth. Really annoying.
    Then when I Finally am able to edit and I want to export it back into a quicktime a 5 minute project can sometimes take HOURS. There were times i left it to export overnight even and it was still going in the morn.
    There has GOT to be something I'm doing wrong here. My projects turn out great once they are done but this time thing is a serious issue. Please can someone offer advice. I even bought an external and took movie files off my HD and off iMovie thinking that was the problem but still it seems to take really long. Are there settings or something i'm missing? I'm no tech guru so anyone who can help would...I would so appreciate it your patience and kindness.
    Thanks so much!
    Hil

    A   .mov  file can contain .mp4 data or other form of compression.  .mov is essentially a wrapper and doesn't in itself tell you what the type of actual compression being used might be. YOUR .mov files may well be  H264 compressed video. You can convert these to any one of several other compressed formats and in doing so you can choose how much quality you wish to convert them to in most instances. You could take that original .mov file and convert it to ProRes 422HQ and get a huge uncompressed files or convert it to a smaller and more compressed form for viewing at a small size and higher compression. FCPX creates those uncompressed (less compressed) ProRes 422 files if you tell it to optimize your media.  File size (literal pixels vs pixels ), amount of compression, data rate and type of compression  all contribute to the eventual quality of the resulting file. I would strongly advise you to NOT dump the original files. In fact when you copy your data from your camera you should copy the ENTIRE folder and keep that as an archive. Larry Jordan has some good information on why that's important. If you downsample to a smaller form that uses less hard drive space an toss the originals you will NEVER be able to get back the full quality. It's like taking a RAW camera still shot and making a small jpg and then tossing the RAW footage. You can't get back data that you throw out. There is no free lunch. FCPx doesn't HAVE to copy from the external drive. You can control that in your preferences. I can promise you that if you toss the original footage in favor of saving some drive space, if that is good footage worth keeping, you will regret it later if you ever choose to reuse that footage and want the best possible image. Buy more hard drive space and get used to doing that cause it won't be the last time you have to buy more storage space.

  • Poor quality lo res mp4s

    Having some issues compressing ProRes 442 HD to lo res mp4; 640x360 @ 600kps. The compression begins to breakup just after it starts playing and then recovers. The same settings compressed out of QT Pro are fine... although they take much longer. Get the same result across AME options re CBR/VBR and 1/2 pass. Anyone with similar results or any ideas how to stop this from happening? cheers. Pete.

    The point was that the client had requested a range of compressions and 600k was one of them. AME does a poor job compared to the same settings in QT Pro, but QT pro is much slower. My point is that AME should really be doing a better job, at least as good as QT Pro, which is 32 bit and as I said very slow.
    We tried all the settings variations even down to key framing and render quality and the result was still not as good as QT Pro.
    cheers. Pete.

  • No Picture Only Sound in ProRes Compression file conversion

    I have used Export in QuickTime 7 to make a smaller file of my 20 GB movie, but when I open it, only sound plays. The original file format is ProRes 4444 compression. Supposedly (according to the house that did digital scans of my films and rendered them with this compression) I can convert to smaller file sizes by using Final Cut Pro or QuickTime Pro. I chose Export, Medium file size and got for format: AAC, Stereo (L R), 32.000 kHz H.264, 320 x 240, Millions; Movie FPS: 15.00; Playing FPS: 15.00; Data Size: 5.13 MC. Does anyone know why I only get sound? Is the codec the problem? If anyone is knowledgeable about ProRes compression and converting to a more standard version I would be very grateful (or if you can point me to someone who is)!!

    I did what you said but it still didn't work. In addition, now I have lost audio on all files. I thought maybe my volume control got turned down or off, so I clicked on it, and got this dialog box: “There are no active mixer devices available. To install mixer devices, go to Control Panel, click Printers and Other Hardware, and then click Add Hardware. This program will now close.” I did that and was asked if the hardware I'm looking for was already connected to my computer; not knowing what to say, I said yes and got a list of Installed Hardware. The only one which looked like it might apply was “Generic Volume;” but when I clicked on it it said the device was working properly.
    Assuming I can get my volume working again, it seems like there is some tweak that I am missing that should get the pic to play. Since the audio was playing and Apple says ProRes files can “easily be transcoded to distribution formats like H.264,” this should work, right? If I get the volume working again, perhaps I can keep trying different options for the settings. Otherwise, do you know where I can go to find help? Apple doesn’t offer any support for its software (a good reason for these Discussion Lists); and I don’t know where to turn. I appreciate the time you’ve spend troubleshooting this.

  • Exporting an Apple ProRes before compressing for SD-DVD or Blu-ray (or AVCH

    Hello,
    this is my question:
    does exporting a sequence to an Apple ProRes Self Contained file helps to gain quality when compressing for SD-DVD or Blu-ray (or AVCH disc)?

    Thanks for answering, Tom.
    Let me try again, though. (Also, just thinking about the footage, forgetting about effects, titles, etc.)
    Do you think that this applies to DV-NTSC and HDV sequences?
    I've compared a DV-NTSC sequence exported out using:
    DV-NTSC compression and one -using Apple ProRes.
    They do look different. Wouldn't you agree to this?
    What about HDV,
    - is it erroneous to think that (when capturing) by transcoding to AIC or ProRes you are gaining some quality?
    - or if you already capture HDV natively, it doesn't make a difference to export an ApplePro Res version to make a SD-DVD from?
    I am concerned with this, because I shot once some HDV footage at night with a Sony Camera, going to a hard drive, and when I transcoded the files from the hard drive to use in FCP, (using MPEG streamclip) I noticed a relevant difference in how much the noise was noticeable on the HDV compressed files vs. the apple ProRes compressed files.
    Have you ever seen these differences?
    Thanks!!!

  • Finalcut lag ProRes 422 HD

    This is not a question about how to fix this issue, this is a question about why, in terms of software, this lag occurs.
    I experienced some serious lag on a brand new macbook pro and I found the reason why.
    When I playback at 51% of the HD video size -> lag.
    When I playback at 50% of the HD video size -> no lag.
    Do FinalCut re-compress each frame when a video playback is needed? The reason behind the 51% seems odd. Someone can clear my mind about that?

    ProRes HD is a very huge file size, and can be very system intensive.  Only needed if you're working with stuff from a RED, Arri, or other such high end camera.  DSLR's should use ProRes LT, no image quality loss at all, smaller files sizes.
    No, FCP does not recompress each frame for playback.  You're simply hitting a performance threashold for your total system abilities (CPU, GPU, RAM, Hard Drives, etc).
    What Mac are you on, how much RAM, what is your hard drive config?

  • Jumpy playback from image sequences rendered in Apple Prores and then exported to h264

    I will start by saying I have been using FCP since 1.0 and am in no way new to this software, but this issue has me going crazy.
    First the Specs:
    MacPro 2 x 2.66 Quad cor Intel Xeon
    16 gig Ram
    OS 10.9.2
    FCP 7.0.3 (sorry but I am not a fan of FCP10 at all)
    In other words, a beast of a system that has played back everything I have ever built on it for years until now. So now for the issue: I work with an amazing 3D Max builder and we have created a building animation exported from that program into and image sequence ( we have tried JPG, TGA and PNG still all with the same effect). I open Quicktime 7 Pro, build the image sequence, save as .mov, import into FCP and drop it into my 1080p30 Apple Prores (HQ ... we also tried SQ) timelines. The timeline renders perfectly and I can play the video perfectly through my system out of Firewire 800 to my Motu V4HD device which then converts the signal to HDMI to my 55" LED TV. The video and playback is perfect.... until:
    If I try to play back the same exact time line into an exported video file, the file will play back with random jumpyness in it. I say random since you can play it back 10 times and it will hiccup during playback at different spots in the video. If you review every frame in the file though using Quicktime 10, 7 or VLC viewer, every frame is perfect. So, it must be the data rate right? Wrong. I have exported now to H264 MP4, M4V, MOV , ect, etc at different data rates from 4mb to 40 mb per second. They all have the same randow jumpyness to it. So it must be my computer right? Nope. I have a Macbook pro that is more powerful than this machine and I rebuild the file using the same method (something I have done a thousand times before) and the exported file does the same thing on that machine. I had my friend do it on his machine... same thing. ERRRR....
    We have even tried using After Effects and Premier to the same result. Rendered it straight from Quicktime Pro, same. Rendered it to 720p30, same. Render it to 24fps, same. I had another editor render it using whatever methods he wanted to use... same. Tried Compressor, SAME.  Tried Adobe Media Encoder, SAME......We even, god forbid, used a PC running Premier and built the image sequence and rendered to h264 at 30fps, 5mbs.... @#$@#$ SAME!
    We just remade the 3D Studio Max export into a 60fps animation since I thought that the individual frames we appearing too far apart and thus causing the jumpyness. That was causing the playback of the upclose objects flying across the screen fast to appear jittery, but not the random playback jumps. The 60fps did smooth out the animation greatly during fast flybys, but the playback jumps are still there in all players, QT, VLC, the web, etc.
    I was starting to think this issue is realted to Mavericks, but since the PC did the same thing that is not it either. I have linked a sample of the clip below exported to 720p30, 25mbs... something that is much smaller than the original and should playback smooth very easily on any of my systems.
    FYI: I have now opened numerous projects I have edited over the last few years and noticed that all of them are now jumpy, so this isn't just an image sequence issue. While the other projects don't use image sequences and instead are shot footage edited together, there is still the random jump (far less than the image sequence as you will see) but they are now there... ***? I have cleared preferences in FCP which helps for a short period of time, but once exported I get the same glitch.
    As I said... I am stumped... ANYONE have ideas for me to try?
    Here is a sample file for you all to see and please tell me if anyone does not see the issue after playing it several times in a row.
    www.media3lv.com/switch/NORTH-sample-720p30_25mb-sec.zip
    One last thing to note... my main goal for these videos is YouTube or Vimeo playback via our company website. I have a few other animations online right now using YouTube and the problem is also showing there. At first I thought it was just my videos, but I have looked at numerous YouTube videos now showing 3D animation and alot of them are jumpy.
    www.supernap.com/supernap-building-design.html
    www.supernap.com/supernap-tscif-exchange.html
    These don't show the issue as bad since the camera fly is much slower, but why is this occuring and is it coming from my source, or is this a known youtube issue? I can program this using out own modules, but YouTube and Vimeo allow for multiple resolutions and a checker script which makes it easier to share over all devices at all quality up to 1080p.
    Advice is welcome and appreciated?

    I have tried at actual, full screen, using 1080p30 size from the original compressed to 4mbs (something my system can handle without blinking), 720p30, etc. etc. etc.  Nothing stops the jumps. Even the activity monitor shows only 5%-15% processing being used by QT and/or FCP.
    I plan to pull my old G5 out of the closet, it runs 10.6.8 and is still rock solid for video editing in FCP7.  If it plays smooth on that 8 year old system then I know it's Mavericks. I'll try that tonight. It floors me though why the original 1080p30 will playback perfect via FCP and Motu, but once I turn of external monitoring and just try to play it via the preview monitor it is jumpy as **** and then the exported file does the same thing.  So strange.  I even deleted prefences of FCP and that does help with screen playback initially, but it always gets jumps in it after playing for a while.
    I knew I should not have started using Mavericks and I HATE FCP10.

  • Why doesn't iMovie use ProRes 422 or native instead of AIC

    Does anybody know why apple still uses AIC to transcode all captured video streams instead of ProRes 422? And why does it transcode in the first place? Why can't they use the native HDV or AVCHD streams?
    I know that using native HDV, and especially AVCHD, loads the processor with all the decoding, but it should at least be an option for high-end machines. HDV editing on FCP works fine and the storage requirements go down to between 1/3 and 1/8 of what it is with AIC and ProRes.
    I think the ideal workflow would be to capture in the native format, edit in the native format when no re-compression is necessary and only render to ProRes when effects/titles/filters are applied.
    Is it just too much development work or is there an architectural consideration from the development group to force everything through AIC for some reason?
    Is it a licensing issue? Does Apple pay royalties for ProRes for every FCP sale? Would it be prohibitively expensive to distribute ProRes with iLife?
    Obviously only someone from the iMovie group would be able to answer all of these questions but we may be able to gather some insights from the community to get a better picture.

    I understand that the iMovie and FCP teams at Apple have been, hitherto, completely independent.
    FCP was bought in - under a different original name - and tweaked from its original incarnation before being offered as 'Final Cut Pro' by Apple. See the section marked "History" in this Wikipedia article.
    iMovie, however, was written long ago to Steve Jobs' specifications by Glenn Reid as a simple video editor for amateurs.
    The ProRes codec appears to have been created separately from the Apple Intermediate Codec of iMovie ..probably because of different programmers' responsibilities for the separate programs ..although, under the 'Terms of Use', we're not supposed to speculate here in Apple Discussions.
    HDV and AVCHD, being extremely 'compressed' methods of storing video, similar to the MPEG-2 format used for squeezing long movies onto small DVDs, cannot be edited 'frame-accurately' directly, as most of the video frames rely on data stored in other frames for their content. In other words, the 1st frame of fifteen frames contains a whole frame's worth of data, but the next 14 contain only differences between the first frame of a group and the subsequent frames.
    So there needs to be a method to 'unscramble' or extract the data from the next few frames after the first of each group, in order to reconstitute the rest of the frames for editing them.
    AIC is the method used in iMovie. ProRes is the method chosen for FCP.
    It's interesting, though, that Randy Ubillos, now 'Chief Architect - Video Applications' at Apple, and the "onlie true begetter" of what later became Final Cut Pro, was the man who demonstrated iMovie '09 at last month's MacWorld Keynote. So if Randy's on hand to explain how to use iMovie, and created the new-style iMovie, then maybe we'll see some more convergence occur. (..iMovie has already taken on board FCP's "instant rendering", so that we no longer have to wait for transitions to be rendered within iMovie, but can see the results immediately. iMovie's real "behind the scenes" rendering now takes place during export, after after editing's finished..)

  • How do you compress . . . losslessly?

    Hi,
    I should know how to do this, but I can't! We make 4 minute programs. We now shoot on Panasonic P2 cards with the HVX200 - mostly in HD. Edits perfectly in Final Cut Pro 7. All works great, overcranking, etc.
    So we'd like to give our client a Master in pretty much lossless format as a QT movie. We export the program from FCPro as a Self Contained movie - the HD format is using about 60mbs data rate, our older Standard Definition (shot on Mini DV) exports as SC movies at about 30 mbs. Everything works well and is fine, and the QT exported movies will play fine - so long as the computer has FCPro loaded on it (which means it has already put the DVCPro Codec in the QT folder). If you try to play a self contained exported movie from FCPro - on a Mac that doesn't have FCPro - the movie won't play. Nor can any PC play it (I don't think.) (Because they won't have the DVCPro codec loaded in the QT folder)
    So all we want to do is put the SC movie into Compressor (the older, standard definition shows), compress it so I'll end up with a QT movie that everybody (all our clients) can play. I'm not looking to actually "compress" the movie to make it smaller - I just want it "playable" in all computers with QT. So When I compress in Compressor, say, an older DV program, I'll choose 30,000kbps as the rate with full size export, no frames control (as I'm not changing the size or frame rate) -- and here's where the weirdness begins. When Compressor is finished with a 4 minute movie- it plays fine - but NOT at 30 mbs. It fluctuates, but usually plays about 14 mbs or thereabouts! But WHY? I put in 30mbs - but that's not what Compressor does!
    To make matters worse - if I compress only a 10 second "test" clip - set it at 30mbs - it'll compress that at about 24 mbs . . . better than 14, but still is ignoring what I tell it. We use one pass (it's faster, and I figure I don't need VBR at these high data rates - could be wrong here. Using h.264 of course. When I compress the HD footage, things seem to work. I can choose 40 mbs, and that's what ompressor does - but with the miniDV Masters - it won't recompress it at 30mbs? I'm also noticing even though I tell Compressor to export at Full Size (720x480) my exported tests are at 655x480?? ***???
    Why won't Compressor listen to me!! Grrrrr . . .
    Can any of you gurus out there help? I'm simply trying to compress our Self contained exported Masters to QT - not so much to make the files smaller - rather to get them OUT of the DVCPro codecs so they'll play on a computer without FCPro loaded on it.
    Wait a minute - I might be getting slightly confused - with the Standard Definition movies shot on MiniDV - perhaps THOSE SC movies can be played by any any machine with QT?
    Thanks for any input here!
    Larry

    Hi Larry,
    the Apple ProRes codecs will give you the lossless thing that you wanted.
    As you are working with P2 material you can use the Log & Transfer function in FCP to ingest your clips and transcode them into ProRes.
    L&T has a setup for ingesting from P2 where you can decide how to transcode your material into: Apple ProRes codec is one of the choice.
    You can choose Apple ProRes 422, which will give you good results, keeping the 4:2:2 color space of your source material.
    In this way you will be working in a ProRes timeline.
    Then you don't need to do any downscaling to SD, just export a self contained QuickTime movie with current settings (no recompressing) and you will get an Apple ProRes encoded QT movie, playable on both Macs and PCs having the QT player installed.
    Here you can find more details about these codecs and different professional workflows, including working with P2:
    http://documentation.apple.com/en/finalcutpro/professionalformatsandworkflows/
    Regards,
    Armando.

  • FCP6 - been advised to use ProRes HQ but am too late for that I think

    Hi Guys
    I'm really confused and a bit bewildered - would really appreciate any thought whatsoever on the following.
    For some bizarre reason I can't figure out yet, my rapid-edits sports sequences blur/ghost from frame to frame (like a bad frame blending) when I preview the sequence on my Dell monitor from my FCP Canvas. Also, when I choose to export to a Quicktime file using current settings, the blurring/ghosting is preserved once I view the burned DVD.
    However, if I choose to select Pro Res 422 as my choice of Quicktime export file instead of keeping current settings, the ghosting seems to go away upon viewing the eventual burned DVD.
    My sequence is in a standard Apple ProRes 422 Timeline. Field Dominance Upper. 25fps. HD(1440x1080)
    I filmed on a PAL Canon XHA1 50i and captured this as standard Pro Res 422.
    I checked the item properties of the sports clips and they match the timeline settings.
    1. I have a couple of Motion clips elsewhere in the sequence which have frame size 1920 x 1080, Field Dominance None - could that cause a problem?
    2. Is there a danger of losing any picture quality by choosing to export to a standard ProRes 422 1440x1080 Quicktime file rather than choosing to export using 'current settings'?
    3.I have been kindly advised to recapture as ProRes HQ but this isn't really feasible for me since I'm at soundmix stage of a 50 minute project (118 one hour tapes). The video for each of the 30 second sports sequences occurs across 3-5 tapes each.
    4. My main concern is that by choosing to export my QT file as standard ProRes 422 1440x1080, since it doesn't seem to ghost when I watch the video on my DVD player, will 'locking it' as standard ProRes 422 1440x1080 when I export ensure it won't ghost when playing the DVD on other people's machines?
    5. If I really must, is there a way of only* re-capturing the sports footage as ProRes HQ and somehow combining that into my standard ProRes timeline with all the other footage that doesn't blur?
    If you can can offer any tips at all I'd really appreciate it.
    Warm regards
    Peter

    My guess is you've shot HDV? And your sequence is HDV Native? HDV is an interframe compression. When things change too fast, HDV sometimes can't keep up. That's my guess about your mushy frames.
    When you're exporting ProRes (an intraframe format), the frames are all compressed individually.
    My advice - export as ProRes and make your DVD that way. By exporting any format, you don't affect the sequence itself.
    You can media manage the quick cut sequences, recapture as ProRes, then cut them back in, but if your ProRes export works, don't bother...
    Patrick

Maybe you are looking for

  • Local lookup in message mapping

    Hi all, I've a table on the SAP PI system filled with data. From my message mapping, I want to do a lookup. What's the best way to perform this lookup. Again, this is a local table. So not a table residing on the SAP ECC system. Thanks a lot. Dimitri

  • Integration to Google Documents?

    Is there anything that could make this possible? I am interested in automatically exporting form responses to Google documents. There are project management tools available through google which could utilize form responses that I would like to use. U

  • Why is the content filtering level isn't allowing me to download certain apps?

    I tried more than one apps.... And even try to download most apps that won't even take up much space....and still isn't working.... I was thinking if I should reset my phone... ?

  • How can I remove child node from JTree???

    Hi, I would like to remove all the child node of my jtree. For instance I would like to remove the c, d, and e nodes. It's possible to remove all the child node or to remove by her name ("c", "d", and "e"). If yes what is the method that it permit to

  • 3400 photos on my ipad when it is plugged into my iMac, I only have 300 actually showing on my iPad?

    Need help! When my iPad 2 is plugged into my iMac, and I select the device in iTunes, the photo tab shows 3400 photos. However, I only have approximately 400 actually selected in iTunes. If I go to the device in iPhoto, it shows all 3400, but I can't