Concurrent User Limitation

Hi,
Understand that VS Studio 2008's CR with a limitation of 3 concurrent user access, am I right?
How about if I upgrade to CR XI Developer Edition,
Is there any concurrent user access limitation?
by using CR Developer XI edition with VS studio 2008, using CR viewer in asp.net web application.
Thanks

All versions of CR are limited to 3 CPL. To increase this, you have to go to Crystal Reports Application Server or Business Objects Enterprise.
Perhaps the better question is; why do you feel you need to go beyond 3 CPL?
For more info re. Crystal Reports Application Server see the following:
http://www.sap.com/solutions/sapbusinessobjects/sme/reporting/crystalreportsserver/featuresfunctions/index.epx
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/40bccdfd-88a6-2b10-1da1-c47a54b625a7
Ludek
Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/SAPCRNetSup

Similar Messages

  • Concurrent Users Limitation

    I was wondering if there is a setting for concurrent users in
    Coldfusion MX 6.1? The admin has looked in several locations for
    where the concurrent users setting was set, but doesn't remember
    where it was.
    Thanks.

    It's the "Maximum Number of Simultaneous Requests", available
    in the "Server Settings" (first section) of the Admin, on the
    "Setting" page in CF 7, and in the "Request Tuning" page in
    CF8.

  • ISE limitation for concurrent user (same user)

    Dears,
    I have cisco ISE 3355 version 2.0.4.018 my question is how can I limit the authenticated user to access only two devices by his username and password.
    where I have cisco ISE integrated with AD for internal employee that access internal SSID and I need to limit employee access for two devices only (PC and Phone)
    So anyone can help me??
    Regards,                  

    The current ISE release 1.1 doesn't have a feature that allows to limit of concurrent user sessions (either Guests or regular 802.1x users) as the ACS 5.3/5.4 does. However, I guess this feature is scheduled for release, ISE 1.2
    Jatin Katyal
    - Do rate helpful posts -

  • Maximum number of concurrent users that can connect to a SQL DB

    I see various SQL DB plan S0, S1, S2 and P1, P2 and P3.  Each one of them talk about DTU's but never talk about the max number of concurrent users.  Where can I find that number and is it configurable by the end user?

    It is the maximum connection that is most important. Best practice is not to have users holding on to their connection for long period of time. Maximum user connection in SQL is 32767, resource permitting. Not sure for Azure SQL. If you follow best
    practice, you are not supposed to hit this limit cause other limits will be hit first.
    Frank

  • Where to find number of concurrent users in 10g OEM

    I have recelntly installed an instance in oracle 10g release2 rdbms.Is this possible to find the number of concurrent users in OEM.If yes please show me the steps.

    The number of concurrent users can be limited by the SESSION initialization parameter.
    But it can also be limited by insufficient or misused resources. It is possible to set the system to permit 30,000 concurrent users (per your post in the Installattion forum) and go into heavy swapping or paging, causing the system to not accept the required number of users.
    A lot depends on the real load characteristics you expect - you may want to consider shared server or RAC configuration for certain load types.
    My instinct is to have very careful planning sessions, with several experienced Oracle DBAs and developers, around the instance configuration.

  • ISE - User limitation

    Hi,
    I know there is endpoint limitation of 2000, 10,000 and 100,000 concurrent endpoints, depending on deployment options. Is there any limit on maximum number of "users" ISE supports in these deployment options?       All the design documents talk only about endpoint limitation, but nothing on user limitation? Is there any limitaion for concurrent number of users that is supported by ISE?
    Also, on the license part, if a user logs in from an endpoint that is profiled (and profiling is used in authorization policy), does it consume 2 licenses, one for the endpoint and one for the user? Will it be both advance license or one base license for user and 1 advance license for endpoint?
    Would appreciate any help.
    REgards,
    Mohan

    Hi,
    Please understand that the concurrent endpoint is the best way to determine the sizing requirements for ISE. The question you ask is valid but the point of setting endpoints is so all scenarios are covered, whether that is a deployment using only user authenticate devices or a mixture of headless devices with user based devices.
    If a user connects through a device that is dynamically profiled, postured, or used any of the advanced on-boarding features you will consume one base and one advanced license.
    Thanks,
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

  • Simple question: No of concurrent users

    How many concurrent web based users can oracle 8i/9i personal and standard edition support?

    I believe that all depends on the hardware resources you have available. I don't know any 'real' limits on the number of concurrent users. If you are asking from a licensing perspective, that all depends on the kind of license you purchase

  • Concurrent user license question

    I currently have the 10-client license for OS X Server 10.4.7
    I have 3 users in the office and another 9 sales reps not in this office who only need occasional FTP access.
    Does a user connected via FTP count as 1 of the client licenses? In other words, if the 3 of us in the office are connected via AFP to a share, does that mean we can have at most 7 FTP users at one time? There's a screen on the FTP service that says 'Allow a maximum of [50] concurrent users' by default... but I don't want to assume.
    Quad G5   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

    The 10-client limitation is for concurrent file-sharing users. It doesn't apply to web, ftp or other services. The screen you reference is for your own use in allocating server and bandwidth resources.

  • EBS concurrent users -- load testing

    Hi,
    As part of performance/load testing for 100 concurrent users, we are not able to load over 99 users. I have set the nprocs=4 (8 cpus) and JVM max=1024.
    I am not what limits I hitting to handle over 100 concurrent users.
    ENV: R12 on RH 5, single node/2-tier combination, 11.2.0.2
    Appreciate any help or suggestions.
    FYI: I have already reviewed and followed steps from note# 362851.1

    As part of performance/load testing for 100 concurrent users, we are not able to load over 99 users. I have set the nprocs=4 (8 cpus) and JVM max=1024.Do you get any errors? Please check Apache/JVM logs for details.
    FYI: I have already reviewed and followed steps from note# 362851.1What is your current JVM configuration?
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • BlazeDS and scalability (i.e., concurrent users)

    BlazeDS relies on the Servlet API...so, it means about a few hundred concurrent users, maximum -- which isn't very encouraging. This is because, in BlazeDS, one user equals one, or maybe two/three threads...
    Has anyone else considered this and/or thought of a work around? I presume BlazeDS cannot load balance, etc, so having a proxy like Apache point to different servers isn't an option.
    Anyone have any suggestions?
    Thanks,
    Cormac

    >>BlazeDS relies on the Servlet API...so, it means about a few
    >>hundred concurrent users, maximum -- which isn't very encouraging.
    >>This is because, in BlazeDS, one user equals one, or maybe
    >>two/three threads...
    How many concurrent users a BlazeDS server can support will depend a lot on what channels/endpoints you are using. You are right that with a streaming endpoint you are probably limited to a few hundred concurrent users because each connection is persistent and is going to tie up one of your app server's request handler threads. If you use polling however you can support many more concurrent users. This is because connections are not persistent and the poll requests made to the server are short-lived. Web/application servers are very good at handling these types of requests so you should be able to handle a few thousand concurrent users using polling (although a number of factors such as your polling interval, type and size of data/messages being sent around, individual app server, server hardware, network configuration etc. will all affect this). The trade off with using polling is that it is not as real time as streaming. If a message shows up on the server it won't get delivered to you right away. Instead you'll get it the next time your poll request reaches the server. This might be ok for some people. If you need "real time" delivery of messages to large numbers of clients, you can use LiveCycle Data Services ES which has an NIO based version of the streaming endpoint. This endpoint can support many more concurrent users (probably a few thousand although caveats listed above also apply here) than the HTTP based streaming endpoint because each connection doesn't tie up a request handler thread.
    >>Has anyone else considered this and/or thought of a work around? I
    >>presume BlazeDS cannot load balance, etc, so having a proxy like
    >>Apache point to different servers isn't an option.
    You can load balance BlazeDS servers. Make sure your load balancer uses session pinning/sticky sessions because for messaging to work you need to keep communicating back to the same server. We've seen some issues with load balancing streaming connections because some load balancers buffer the data being sent back to the client over the streaming connection. I believe Apache is one of the servers that does this so you'd definitely have to do some testing to find a proxy server that worked for you if you wanted to load balance streaming connections.
    >>Anyone have any suggestions?
    BlazeDS actually scales quite well (at least in my opinion) when using non-persistent connections with short-lived requests, such as with polling. If you want to support large numbers of concurrent users with streaming/persistent connections, I'd look at using LiveCycle Data Services ES.
    -Alex

  • Recommended spec can take how many concurrent users

    With the following recommended spec from Adobe website, how many concurrent users ?
    Flash Media Streaming Server system requirements
    OS : Windows Server 2003 SP2 or Windows 2008
    H/W Requirements
    -          3.2GHz Intel Pentium 4 Processor (dual Intel Xeon or faster recommended)
    -          2GB RAM ( 4GB recommended)
    -          1Gb Ethernet card

    Hi,
    The number of concurrent users really depends on your setup.
    You might want to read the blogpost from the FMS PM on this at: http://blogs.adobe.com/ktowes/2008/08/breaking_1gbps_on_flash_media.html
    "I’ve received a lot of requests lately about how much media can be delivered through Flash Media Server (FMS). As you may or may not know, FMS is held to the same limitations as most other streaming or HTTP servers, that is the available bandwidth, disk speed, memory and CPU power on a single server. When we introduced Flash Media Server 3 we increased the performance significantly to allow you to take full advantage of hardware and ultimately help to reduce the total cost of ownership. ........... read on"
    Greetz,
    Klaasjan

  • Concurrent User Connections

    Greetings all and please grant a noob a small bit of latitude. I've recently started a BIT program and one question that has repeatedly stumped me as I research databases is the maximum number of concurrent user connectoins for Oracle 11g.
    As an example, and NOT SPAM, SQL Server 7.0 lists the number of Concurrent User Conncections at 32,767, http://sqlserver2000.databases.aspfaq.com/what-are-the-capacities-of-access-sql-server-and-msde.html.
    Can anybody point me in the right direction and is there such a number or limitation for Oracle's products?
    Thanks in advance,
    Mark

    user11721301 wrote:
    Greetings all and please grant a noob a small bit of latitude. I've recently started a BIT program and one question that has repeatedly stumped me as I research databases is the maximum number of concurrent user connectoins for Oracle 11g.
    As an example, and NOT SPAM, SQL Server 7.0 lists the number of Concurrent User Conncections at 32,767, http://sqlserver2000.databases.aspfaq.com/what-are-the-capacities-of-access-sql-server-and-msde.html.
    Can anybody point me in the right direction and is there such a number or limitation for Oracle's products?
    Thanks in advance,
    MarkGo to tahiti.oracle.com. Drill down to your product and version. There you will find the complete doc library.
    Start by clicking on the "Books" tab and reviewing the list of titles, just to get familiar with what's available.
    Next, go to the Reference Manual and review the table of contents to get familiar with what information is available there; you should see detailed descriptions of initialization parameters and data dictionary views, among other things.
    Next start reading the Concepts Manual in earnest.
    Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish and he eats for a lifetime.

  • 500 Concurrent Users: 2 J2EE Servers are enough???

    Hello All,
    We are planning to build the PRD system for the client on the MSCS Cluster environment. There will be 500 concurrent users and they want to have 2 J2EE Servers.
    Now my Question is although there's no Single Point of Failure(SPOF) can we go ahead with the 2 J2EE Servers (I think we should not).
    We are suggesting 3 J2EE Servers instead of 2 as the matter of the fact with 2 Servers is, What if one of the server goes down, all the load will be then on the single Server which may not handle all the load and may die too.
    So i'm looking for the strong points to convince them for 3 Servers instead of 2.
    Any ideas...
    Points are guranteed
    Vaib

    In my experience, a single server with a 1.5GB heap size will handle about 500 - 700 users.  A lot of this depends upon what exactly is going on in the portal.  ESS and MSS will tend to have a greater impact on the portal than BW reports.  I would say that the strongest way to convince them of this is to execute some load tests and see where the limits of your boxes are based upon your specific portal implementation.

  • Trying to determine costs per concurrent user

    I have tried to investigate the services and theirs costs as well as I can and tried to get help. However I have very little experience with hosting and databases so after all this research I'm left with a bunch of questions.
    Forgive me if this is too many for this kind of forum, if so, could you please refer me to where I can learn more?
    We're developing a multiplayer browser game in Unity3D. The game will communicate with a SQL database. I'm trying to determine how much it will cost me per Monthly Active User (MAU) and per Concurrent User (CCU). To do so I need some things clarified. In order
    to determine which feature will be the most limiting and therefore define which performance level I need.
    They will on average communicate with the database app. two times a minute (defined as two queries per minute). Does this mean that I need a transaction rate of at least two per CCU?
    How fast can you open and close a session? I'm trying to figure out whether I need to have one session open constantly per user connected to the game. If so, I suppose max sessions would be equal to CCU?
    If I need more CCU than one database of a given performance level supports can I then just subscribe for more databases which will then automatically become copies of one another and you will divide users between the databases automatically?
    As I understand your description of your database services through Basic, Standard and Premium, the database will be able to work independently of additional webhosting. However then I do not understand why there is no info in regards to bandwith limitations.
    Do I need your webhosting services along with subscribing for the database? Then I suppose the bandwith limitations of the webhosting applies for the database as well?
    In regards to the webhosting, besides for maybe handling the database, the website's by far most demanding service will be to allow users to download a game of max 30 MB. How can I estimate how many users will be able to download simoultaneously from a given
    VM instance, e.g. basic 1?
    If the database depends on this website for communication to the game, how can I then estimate how demanding that will be to the power of a given VM instance?
    I realise that some of these questions may be difficult to give precise answers to but any help with getting closer to an answer is highly appreciated.

    This is by no means accurate and complete, but will give you an idea about how to go about doing estimates:
    First you need to know what database tier you need: basic, standard or premium.
    The tier you need depends on the processing power you need, and directly relates to the number of concurrent users you have at any given time and the processing requirement of the database.
    You can determine this only after you do some benchmarking of your app.
    Supposed you have 100 users and you need basic tier S0, then cost per user will be (cost for S0)/100.
    Then you need cost for your web service/site.
    Again you need to know how powerful it needs to be.
    You can determine this only after you do some benchmarking of your app.
    Again supposed you need a A3 then cost per user will be (cost of A3)/100.
    Then you need cost for data transfer from your web service to your user.
    Supposed every data transfer is 10K, then you have 20K/min.
    Supposed a user stays in your game for an hour, then you have 1.2M/user/session.
    Supposed the user plays 10 times/month, then you have 12M/user per month. Then you can calculate the cost per user.
    I suppose you can safely assume that bandwidth is not a limitation in Azure for your app for the moment.
    Frank

  • Restricting Concurrent users on a particular BSP Application

    We are having an appraisals link in the PM section of the portal which runs the HAP_DOCUMENT BSP application. We have to restrict the number of concurrent users accesing this application at the same time to about 600 so that the server will not crash...Is there a way by which i can find out the no of users accesing a partcular BSP application concurrently??

    Appearently my interpretation of how Logon Groups work don't match up to their actual sophistication. 
    They use this number of users only as a gage to load balance between mutliple app servers.  It never uses this amount as a limiting factor.
    Sorry if I led you down an incorrect path.  It seemed promissing.  However you could at least use this approach to limit the load to a single app server.  You could then configure the maximum number of concurrent connections in the ICM on this app server.  However this probably only works if you are willing to dedicate a single app server to this single application.

Maybe you are looking for