Condition type date should be same to the pricing procedure date

hi
i have an problem
the problem is that condition type date is not same to the pricing procedute date
details of the problem
1. created a sales order the pricing date is 01.04.2006
2. when i go conditions in the sales order, as i go for details of the condition type date the is 04.04.2006
this date should be same ie 01.04.2006
give the solutions and relevant fields or procedure for this i will be greatful to all of u
bye

Braja,
Check this
Goto the billing plan tab in the corresponding line item and check the rule that is determined. Now go to the configuration of this rule table by using the path
SPRO>SD> Billing> Billing Plan> Define rules for determining dates and choose your Applicable rule and click on the details.
There you will see the Calendar ID field where you will have to maintain the applicable factory calendar. I think this should work and your billing date on the item relevant for billing plan should be the same as the other item.
Hope this helps,
Ravin

Similar Messages

Goods receipt date should be greater than the P.O. date

Hi
Is there any option to control the Goods receipt date should not be lesser than the P.O.Date??
Eg: P.O. is raised in 10.1.9, User should not do the GRN before 10.1.9. In which way we can control this???
Regards
Ravi

Dear,
You have to include User exit in MIGOwhich will trhrow an error at the time when Goods receipt date is greater than the P.O. date.
Regards
Utsav

Rebate fixed amount condition in the pricing procedure

Hi SD Gurus,
i'm using rebate fixed amount conditions (Lum sum).
The situation from a business point o f view is the following: i pay the customer 1000$ once he made something.
This kind of condition is not relevant for accruals since they have to be built manually (manual accrual). As a consequence i'm note sure if this condition shoul be put in the pricing procedure used for invoices. In the other and for sure this condition should be inserted in the pricing procedure for manual accrual/credit note.
What is your point of view!!
Thanks
C

if you are going to use Rebate, then there is no need to add condition type in standard pricing procedure, if you have designed your pricing procedure, include condition types for rebates as in standard pricing procedure.
This condition type is linked to Rebate type.
I think you first try the scenario in IDES and then do the same settings as per yoru requirement.
If you want step-by-step procedure for rebates will help you
Please refere the thread
rebate documentation
Regards
Jitesh

Substitution - Baseline Date to be replaced by the Goods Receipt date

Dear Forum,
We have the payment terms defined in the system, with the baseline date corresponding to the 'Document Date' and the credit terms as 60 Days. The users now desire that the Baseline Date should instead correspond to the Goods Receipt Date. To enable this we need to define the substitution such as the Baseline Date at the time of Invoice Verification gets substituted by the Goods Receipt Date, if the GR Date is earlier than the IV date.
Would appreciate help from the friends as to how to configure this and which feilds to be chosen and replaced.
Thanks!
Regards,

Hi
You can make the Baseline Date in Invoice (MIRO) with Goods Receipt Date using BADI.
BADI -->MRM_PAYMENT_TERMS
Tell your ABAP Guy to work on this BADI.
In the BADI, MRM_PAYMENT_TERMS Read the Value in WEBUD of Internal Table TI_DRSEG and Pass it into E_ZFBDT.
Also if the Baseline Date is changed manually, then after posting you can see the Goods Receipt Date in Baseline Date.
This resolves your issue.
regards
venkat

Get pricing procedure data in COND_COM BADI

Hi All,
Does any one know which FM i need toc all to get the Pric procedure info in COND_COM BADI??
Regards
Vijay

Hi,
It would be wiser to call two FM's instead of one to get the required info....since most of the CR_ISA* FM would again internally call a BADI which may be a problem or if you do a CRM_ORDER_READ it would unnecessary be a performance issue at times when you have lot of items in the basket.
So the best approach would be to call as follows:
CRM_ISA_SHOP_READ - Read the process type from Shop
CRM_ORDER_DOC_P_PROC_SEL_CB - Then read the pricing procedure
Regards
Sidd

Condition type PB00 and PBXX, coming in the same PO Item

Hi,
In the PO (created with reference to Outline Agreement), condition types PB00 and PBXX are coming in the same line item.
In the PO output, the PB00 value is also showing up and PBXX value is also showing up. User entered PBXX value as 350000 dollars which is right, however system is picking 1.2 million dollar of PB00 from outline agreement which is not intended here. As a result of that the output going to Vendor is exceeding more than 1.2 million dollar instead of 350,000 dollars. I cannot change or delete any othe condition types.THis is a production problem.
Has anyone faced this problem. I appreciate your reply in advance.
Thanks,

Well, thanks Saurav and Prabhakaran, however the problem still stays.
The contract is created for services (1 lot), so the dollar amount can vary depending upon the service rendered by the consultant.
That mean user will only enter the service amount.
Saurav, system should not copy down PB00, it should come by itself when user enters the specific amount. And it comes from contract. PBXX should only appear if there is no PB00 maintained in the contract. This is not the case. The service amount is maintained in the contract. Also, I don't think that PBXX and PB00 should come in one line item together as normal system behaviour & as a normal business process too. Moreover, it is not happeniing in the other two line items - line item 20 and line item 30 are fine. The pricing analysis shows both the conditions as found - PB00 and PBXX, so I could not take any clue from analysis too.
Prabhakaran, system is only behaving incorrectly for line item 10. It is behaving as expected (good ) for other line items and other PO's. So, we cannot touch the pricing procedure as that will affect other line items.
Regards

Statistical condition type is not showing same value

Dear All,
I have one issue related with pricing condition that i want to use one statistical condition type ZEM1 suppose 100 INR which is entered manually at the contract level for suppose 10 qty but when i am creating the First sales order for 5 qty with reference to contract ,the ZEM1 condition is copied 100 INR and in second sales order for remaining 5 qty it is distributed with quantity and showing value 50 INR.But my requirement is such that i want the condition value of ZEM1 should appeare as 100 INR from contract to billing level for every sales cycle.Is it any way to make the condition type such that it will have the same value suppose 100 INR from contract to billing doc for every sales orders.
I maintained the copying control pricing type as "D" for S.Doc to S.Doc.
please suggest.
thanks in advance
ravi k

Hello
Check the condition type configuration. in the calculation type give the indicator as B- Fixed amount
the copy control seems to be correct.
you can try above and revert
hope this helps
Thanks
akasha

JMOD condition type value should be always rounded up instead of commercial

Hi Helpers,
I need one clarification from you all based on your expertise,
1. JMOD condition type value should be always rounded up instead of commercial.
2. i have been already made rounding up in the condition type JMOD in the transaction V/06. but unfortunatly not working.
3. after that we found that there is configuration change in spro (company code setting in the indai taxation-CIN) in the Logistic general> tax on goods movement>india> basic setting> company code setting for the commercialrounding, but the same is already ennabled with SD rounding IND.
Need your expertise on this.How shall we make it round up always for JMOD condition value. below is an example for your further analysis.
Example: if values UTXJ is : 8,913.40 and JMOD will be calculated based on UTXJ as 10% thats is 891.34.
Actually this should be 892 as per the requiremen.t

I just recently rolled off a project in Europe that had an issue similar to this. We were having rounding issues as a result of % discounts.
However, we did come up with a solution that is provided by SAP.
Please review OSS note 80183 on SAP rounding and the solutions provided within the note.
I hope this helps.
Kind Regards,
Jason

Req. delivery date and Delivery date should be same in a sales order

Hi experts,
We need a customization for getting Requested delivery date, Material Availability date and Delivery date should be same.
Example if I keep request delivery date as 12/12/2012, system should consider same dates for MAD and Delivery and confirm the requested quantity.
How to achieve this customization..
Thanks,
Bala.

system should consider same dates for MAD and Delivery and confirm the requested quantity
What you are going to achieve by this? Hope you know the concept of MAD and confirmed quantity fields. Let us assume, if stock is not there for a material for which sale order is created, can you let me know, you want the system still to confirm the quantity? You can post the goods issue only if system confirms the quantity in schedule line which is possible, only if stock is made available. If client asks something which is not possible in SAP, think in a logical way how SAP works and convince them accordingly.
G. Lakshmipathi

Condition type determined but net value of the item is zero

Hello guys
In one of my sales process I have a single condition type assigned to the pricing procedure, when I create a sales order then system is determining value of that condition type but system makes the net value to zero. Any help would be highly appreciated.
Regards
Javed Ihsan

Hi Javed,
The reason for the same could be that
1. the conditions is statistical
2. The net value can only be seen at the header if you have maintained the net value as one of the line items in the pricing procedure.
Kindly check.
Hope this help.
Reward with points if helpfull !!!!!!!!
Regards,
Rekha Dadwal

Purchase order one particular condition type vale should not inventorised

Dear All,
I have a scenario in the purchase order particular one condition type value should not get inventorised that should goes to a seperate account. it should not added with material cost
i have created a seperate condition type ZZ01
with condition class : A - Discount or surcharge
calcualtion type : A - Percentage
and i have attached this condition type to pricing procedure in accurals i have maintained a seperate posting transaction.
the amount is getting posted against the accural transaction event key.
but its getting inventorised with material cost it should not get inventorised..
what is the procedure...
Regards
Anand.
Edited by: Anandhakumar Palanisamy on Mar 24, 2010 1:17 PM

Hi..
I have maintained for this condition type Accurals in M/06
and i have maintained the Statistical tick mark in pricing procedure..
but its getting inventorised...
it should not inventorised...
any other solution...
Regards
P.Anandhakumar

Having 2 condition type discounts show as active in the sales order.

1 condition type discount has value 0%
2 condition type discount has value 31%.
Both are showing green and being active.
once I place a digit intead of the 0% Ex: 29% then the 2nd condition then becomes inactive and works fine.
What the user would like is to have that 0% as being inactive. Its inactive only when putting a digit greater then 0%. We would like it to be inactive on 0% as well.

Hey Kookie
I think I gave a bit of a confusing scenerio before. Pretty much in the conditions you can have many condition discounts. But one will be active and all the others then become inactive. If this is the case that 0% should then automatically become inactive as well.
I will give u the config of how it looks in the pricing procedure.
Step 101, Counter 0, condition type Z949, Description Material grp discount, /// Manual, Required, Statistic none of these are checked. Print=X, Requirement 2=item with pricing, condition formula=0, bastype=0, acct key=ers.

How to set the Reverse date to be the same as the Actual GI date by default

Hello,
On VL09 (reverse goods movement) screen, default reversal date is the system date.
Users have to select the line, click on define date button and enter the correct cancellation date to the local date field on the pop-up.
I want the reversal date on VL09 screen to be the same as the Actual GI date by default.
Thank you.

Hi,
I checked the program.
Check in routine FORM insert_data_for_reversal ---> IF Condition (( xlikpukwa-wbstk EQ charc AND xlikpukwa-vbtyp CA vbtyp_lief ) OR ( xlikpukwa-wbstk CA 'BC' AND xlikpukwa-vbtyp CA vbtyp_liav ). ---> 2 performs are there one with '01' and other with '02' as actual parameters.
In your case '01' is passing to the routine. if you try to pass '02' u can achive your requirement.
For testing in debug mode pass FIELDS-FIELD_ATTR = '02' for field name DATLO. then you can see the output.
Try to handle this problem using Enhancement Operations.
Hope this helps you.
Thanks
Raghavendra

Pricing : Condition type value need tog get from the lowest of 4 other cond

Hi,
I have one requirement in one pricing procedure.
I need to calculate condition value of one condition type from the lowest value of other 4 condition tyeps. These condition types values are not defined as a subtotal.
So if I decide to write a formula on condition values, is there
any way to select these values and choose the lowest of them?
Please also advice if there is any other way such as condition exclusion
or so?
Thanks and regards,
Anand

Anand,
As you have mentioned you can use condition exclusion for such a requirement.
here is a detailed description of how you can achieve this: use the menu path IMG> Sales & Distribution> Basic Functions> Pricing> Condition Exclusion> Condition exclusion for group of conditions.
When you execute this IMG acitivity you get a window with three options
1.Define Condition Exclusion Groups
2.Assign condition types to the exclusion groups
3.Maintain condition exclusion for pricing procedures
We will use these three options one by one, we start with the first
1. Define an exclusion group, lets say EX01 and give a description
2 Assign the four condition types that you want to compare to this exclusion group under this option
   lets say EX01 ZK01
               EX01 ZK02
               EX01 ZK03
               EX01 Zk04
3. under this third step, select the pricing procedure that you are working on and from the left margin click on 'Exclusion'. click on 'New Entries' and make the following entries (example)
         Sno.   Cpr         ExGr1
          10      A            EX01                leave ExGr2 blank, Save your entries
Check if your purpose has been met or not. Do give your feedback
Regards,
PATHIK

Why public class name should be same as the java file name

Hi,
I would like to know, why public class name should be same as the its java file name. Iam in the process of finding the answer to this question. Can someone help me out in finding the explanation.
Thanks in advance,
Manoj

This is a requirement of the Java reference compiler released by Sun. I have used compilers that did not require this, but most seem to follow the reference compiler (which is a very good idea). I am NOT sure if this is specified in the Java Language Specification. Some of the other regulars who are more familiar with the JLS than I may be able to tell you.
? {?

Condition type date should be same to the pricing procedure date

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for