Condition type in contract not reflecting on to the PO release

Hi All,
I have a contract wherein i have two condition types which are set i.e. PB00 and ZM07. Now i've made some changes and removed ZM07 and instead put ZM05.
This new condition type (ZM05) is not reflecting on to the PO already released or on to the new line items that are being added to the already existing PO's. Kindly let me know what/where to change to effect ZM05 on the line items of release orders.

Hi,
One thing you could try is the Update button on the item Conditions detail tab. Run the selection for B Carry out new pricing
C Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine the others
"B" is pretty good for adding in new condition types that are added after the PO has been created.
Regards.

Similar Messages

Condition type freight is not getting displayed in print preview

Hi,
I created PO, and while seeing its print preview:
Condition type freight is not getting displayed.
Where i missed?
Uts

hi,
Inddition to M/08...(As given above)...
Also do check the smart form or SAP script...used for the output...check it with the ABAPer...whether the field is liable for o/p or not??
Smart form is attached at message type of message determination..
Regards
Priyanka.P

Purchase order one particular condition type vale should not inventorised

Dear All,
I have a scenario in the purchase order particular one condition type value should not get inventorised that should goes to a seperate account. it should not added with material cost
i have created a seperate condition type ZZ01
with condition class : A - Discount or surcharge
calcualtion type : A - Percentage
and i have attached this condition type to pricing procedure in accurals i have maintained a seperate posting transaction.
the amount is getting posted against the accural transaction event key.
but its getting inventorised with material cost it should not get inventorised..
what is the procedure...
Regards
Anand.
Edited by: Anandhakumar Palanisamy on Mar 24, 2010 1:17 PM

Hi..
I have maintained for this condition type Accurals in M/06
and i have maintained the Statistical tick mark in pricing procedure..
but its getting inventorised...
it should not inventorised...
any other solution...
Regards
P.Anandhakumar

Additional Branch Condition Type in but not documented in HTMLDB UG v1.6

I would like to understand this condition type for Branch processing:
When Process in Comma Delimited List of Process IDs Has Run
How are Process IDs known? Could an example using this condition be provided?
Thanks,
Kelly

Kelly - This is a condition type available everywhere, not just for branches. However, it has never been implemented. It is an error that we make it available in these LOVs.
Scott

Running KE27. Getting an error " Condition type XX12 is not active"

Hi There -
When running KE27 getting an error Copa Validation: Condition Type XX12 is not active.
Appreciate your time.
Thanks
Sri

Hi Sri,
is this a standard erromessage? Which code (ex: XY123)?
br, Guido

SAP Portal changes not reflect in all the servers without reboot?

Dear SDN Members
We have one sap ep 7.0 eh1 main instance and 4 other portal instances.every time we tranport any portal develpment work such as epa packages, we need to restart all the instances to reflect the new changes.can you please suggest me
a solution if exists to avoid bouncing of all instances when a portal development work is transported.
Why does the changes not reflect in all the servers without the reboot??
Thanks
Chandra

Thanks for the quick response kenny, i wonder if we can configure any parameters in UME
to avoid bouncing of all the instances. please let me know if you have any other suggestions.
actually we have a central portal instance and 4 other portal servers connected through a
load balancer.Any tranport we move to central instance should refelect the changes in all
other portal instances.But we need to restart all the instances to see the new changes.
We are trying to find a solution if availbel which prevents server-restarts after each transport.
Thanks
Sekhar

TS3048 Wireless keyboard turns on but can not type. Can not do any of the trouble shooting I read about because I can not type my password .... Please Help

The Apple wireless keyboard will not work. Batteries are new, light is on & goes into search mode. Worked fine yesterday, today - wont type. Can not do any of the troubleshooting I read about online because I can not type my login. Is there a lock key I may have hit by accident and can unlock? The bluetooth is working because my wireless mouse works...Please Help

I was just researching the same problem and found this info :
"I figured it out, i had "mouse keys" on.
To fix go to Preferences>Universal>Mouse> MouseKeys and click off"
sure enough I had the 'mousekeys' on and turning it off - keyboard now working
hope this works for you

Duplicate condition type in contract header

Dear Experts,
In contract (VA43) header, i am getting duplicate Condition type (zcondition type). This condition type is not duplicate at Item level.
Also at header level where dupluicacy is there, it has both Statiscal indicator marked and unmarked rows. No access sequence has been assigned for the condition type.
My requirement is there should not be duplicate condition type at header level. Find below screenshot for the same.
Please guide me what should be the required steps to rectify the error.
Best Regards,

You can also create conditions at header level, however, these can only be discounts or surcharges. These master conditions are used by Pricing in SAP Enterprise Buyer to determine a gross price. For details, check SAP help at
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm30/helpdata/en/ee/d9df3bbcce4b37e10000000a114084/content.htm
The following thread might be useful to you as well Pricing Condition in Contract

Condition types in Contracts

Hi Guys,
I want to introduce some'condition type in CRM contract which should not call IPC for any calculations. I need to include these conditions as a manual entry and its values will be referred only by custom developed code for some information purpose at a later stage.
can some one let me know if this is feasible?
Thanks
Kamalesh

It totally depends on your pricing procedure.Dont include the condition number of your condition type in any calc from and to of other condition type.Be the condition type be independent.Just include in the pricing procedure and select the manual check box.
Regards,
PePe

Condition type value can not be changed in PO pricing

I have created PO which is having pricing procedure consisting different condition type. When i create any subsequent document (MIGO or MIRO) and realized that condition value in the pricing need to be changed so I have reversed all subsequent document so that can carry out "update pricing".
when i press Update pricing button on the condition tab, its showing message that new pricing can not be carried out. I observed that some condition types of pricing are grayed out.
Kindly help to solve this problem. Kindly help me how to 1) update pricing or 2) can change value of condition type.
answers will be rewarded

Hi shiwanshu
Actually i tried the same and could change after I have reversed all subsequent documents
Since your system does't allow you change and since you have reversed all the subsequent docs why dont you delete the PO item and add a new one with right pricing..
i guess it will solve your problem..
Hope helps
Best Regards
Reward please if found useful

Conditions in Calculation Schema not reflecting in Purch Info Record

Hi,
We are using calculation procedure TAXIN.
We have maintained Calculation Schema & maintained required conditions.
When we checked for maintaining these conditions in Purchasing Info Record, (Transaction Code - ME11 / ME12), these conditions are not appearing in the info record. But, the conditions appearing in the info record are not same as those in the Calculation Schema.
Also, the conditions maintained in Info Record are not getting copied to Purchase Order (except Base Price P000).
What could be the reason behind this? How to correct the same?
Regards,
Prashant Kolhatkar

Tax procedure condtions will not appear in the info record. for the conditon which is not reflecting in the PO, you may check in inforecord whether there is a check mark in condition record saved for approval; if so it is deleted

Condition type: UTXJ is not getting re-determined in Quotation/ Sales Order

Dear All,
I had created one Quotation with
Customer-Tax Classification as 1 - Taxable, and
Material _ Tax Classification as 0 - Tax Exempt
Condition Records (T.Code: VK11) wasn't maintained.
Later on, I got informed that Material is also taxable. So, I changed the Material - Tax Classification to 2 - Service Tax.
Then, I maintained Condition Records (in VK11).
Now, still taxes are not getting calculated in Quotation.
When i tried to check Condition Type: JSER - Service Tax; Its still showing A0 - 0% Output Tax in Field: Tax Code instead of AA - O/P (interim) 12.36%
Also, when i tried to Upadte - Pricing Type: Copy Pricing Elements unchanged and redetermine Taxes in Tab: Conditions; System give following Log:
Maintain the chapter ID for material LSGENOTHERS J_1IMTCHID
Please, assist.
Note: When i tried to create new quotation with same Parameters (Customer & Material for the same Sales Area) taxes are getting calculated.

Hi Pramod,
Check following things.
Check teh pricing date of the Earlier Quotation.
And now check the Condition reocrds validity date which u created later.
Ur condition record must be valid on the pricing date, thenonly it will be picked up by the system.
After u adjust the validity of the condition record, click update pricing.
also check the material tax clasification in Sales Item level under Billign Document tab, it should be 2, if it is not then change it accordingly and regenerate the pricing.
Hope this will resolve your issue.
for anything further pls revert.

Condition type in Billing not in Sales Order

Dear Friends,
I have the following scenario in our project. Please clarify.
We have a condition type. That should be appeared only in Billing, it should not appear in Sales Order.
Please answer ASAP.
Regards,
Rajesh L

Hello,
To fullfil you requirement go to V/08 select your pricing procedure and relevant condtion type. Then select requirement column and assign the Routing 24 click save.
regards
rc gopi

Condition type in PO not posting to desired transaction key.

Dear experts,
I was wondering whether someone could help me with the following:
I have defined a condition type for which specific additive costs for a purchased finished good should be added. The material is valued at standard price with the specifics that prior to the price calculation via transaction CK74N, additive costs are calculate and then added when executing CK11N that is composed of the price of the purchased finished good and the additive costs. We have created a condition type to break down the additive costs in the one hand and the material cost on the other. We want to have these costs to be posted against a specific cost account. We have created a transaction (via OBYC) for that and added it to the calculation schema. However, when posting the Goods Receipt, the additive costs (difference between the standard price and material price in the PO) are not posted to the desired transaction/GL account but to the price difference account (transaction PRD).
Could anyone please provide me with the customizing steps I should follow to succeed in the flow we want to implement? Can this desired outcome be done via standard or should any User Exit or programming be done to get the expected results?
Thanks in advance and regards,
David.

hi
Standard SAP Post the difference only with PRD account.

Condition type in PO not posting to desired transaction

Dear experts,
I was wondering whether someone could help me with the following:
I have defined a condition type for which specific additive costs for a purchased finished good should be added. The material is valued at standard price with the specifics that prior to the price calculation via transaction CK74N, additive costs are calculate and then added when executing CK11N that is composed of the price of the purchased finished good and the additive costs.
Next, we have created a condition type to break down the additive costs in the one hand and the material cost on the other. We want to have these costs to be posted against a specific cost account. We have created a transaction (via OBYC) for that and added it to the calculation schema. However, when posting the Goods Receipt, the additive costs (difference between the standard price and material price in the PO) are not posted to the desired transaction/GL account but to the price difference account (transaction PRD).
Could anyone please provide me with the customizing steps I should follow to succeed in the flow we want to implement?
Thanks in advance for your kind support.
Eric

Hi again,
Do you know what steps we should take in order to modify the standard functionality to have the part of the standard cost asigned to the condition type post to its transaction and not to the standard PRD transaction?
Thanks and Regards,
Eric

Condition type in contract not reflecting on to the PO release

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for