Conditions in Calculation Schema not reflecting in Purch Info Record

Hi,
We are using calculation procedure TAXIN.
We have maintained Calculation Schema & maintained required conditions.
When we checked for maintaining these conditions in Purchasing Info Record, (Transaction Code - ME11 / ME12), these conditions are not appearing in the info record. But, the conditions appearing in the info record are not same as those in the Calculation Schema.
Also, the conditions maintained in Info Record are not getting copied to Purchase Order (except Base Price P000).
What could be the reason behind this? How to correct the same?
Regards,
Prashant Kolhatkar

Tax procedure condtions will not appear in the info record. for the conditon which is not reflecting in the PO, you may check in inforecord whether there is a check mark in condition record saved for approval; if so it is deleted

Similar Messages

Condition type in contract not reflecting on to the PO release

Hi All,
I have a contract wherein i have two condition types which are set i.e. PB00 and ZM07. Now i've made some changes and removed ZM07 and instead put ZM05.
This new condition type (ZM05) is not reflecting on to the PO already released or on to the new line items that are being added to the already existing PO's. Kindly let me know what/where to change to effect ZM05 on the line items of release orders.

Hi,
One thing you could try is the Update button on the item Conditions detail tab. Run the selection for B Carry out new pricing
C Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine the others
"B" is pretty good for adding in new condition types that are added after the PO has been created.
Regards.

Conditions in Quotation not getting updated in Info record

Hi,
i have created & maintained a quotation having condition type as PBXX, CUIN & ZRA01 with info update indicator as "C" i.e. Update without Plant.
When i maintain it & try to save it, system shows the message as "Followig types of conditions i.e. "CUIN & ZRA01" can not be copied to info record.
i need to update these condition with condition type CUIN & ZRA01 as well to be maintained in info records
Can anybody help please.
Best regards
Hemchandra
9818103494

Hi
Purchase info records use the supplementary schema for maintaining the conditions.
Please maintain the supplmentary schema for the condition type PB00.
RM0002 is the stad supplementary scheam which has all the supplement conditions like doscounts and surcharges.
Once you maintain these the sytem will update your conditions in the inforecord.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Condition Type not showing in Purchase Info Record

Hi,
I have created a new condition type but I can't see it in the purchase info record. Can some one please provide me with the relavent steps required to show it in the PIR.
Thanks
Adeel

Hi buddy,
pls check this.
SPRO-Material Management-Conditions-Define Calculation Schema
from here you need to select your schema and highlight it. Then click the control data. you can now add you Customized condition type you've made.
Hope this help you..
Rewards if useful.
thanks.

Vendor in condition type/purch info record

hi,
in condition type, i notice in account determination, there is a vendor field. but this vendor field not exist in all condition type. only freight/customs related with this vendor field.
1) may i know how does the system know whether the condition type needs vendor field or not.
2) in purchase info record, can we defined second vendor as transporter on top of first vendor which is supplier? if can where can i defined as i cant see second vendor in PIR.
thanks
rgds

Hi,
1) may i know how does the system know whether the condition type needs vendor field or not.
Ans:- While creation of Condition type in SPRO we put the condition category as D that is deleivery costs. This determines that this condition type can have Vendor field.
2) in purchase info record, can we defined second vendor as transporter on top of first vendor which is supplier? if can where can i defined as i cant see second vendor in PIR.
Yes you can. Select the COndition type button which appears on top of info record change/creation. Then choose the validity date. Then enter the delivery condition type for e.g FRA1 which is standard one and enter the amount then selet this condiin type and clik on details button or F6 key you will see the vendor field.
Thanks
Shashi
Please give points if info is help ful

Metadata edited in Bridge is not reflected in the Info Dialogue Box, but shows up in Photoshop.

Metadata edited in Bridge is not reflected in the Info Dialogue Box, but shows up in Photoshop.

Dear Ramón,
You are right that not all metadata is shown in the Finder info but in my case the once added in IPTC core do show as expected for most file types (but not CR2 raw). As you now I convert my CR2 to DNG for a long time now I had to look up the original Raw file and create the data for description, location, keywords again. The data you can add and alter yourself in the IPTC Core field. I added a series of screenshots showing different info and to my surprise (another reason to keep to DNG…) the Raw file had very less info and the xmp shows it all in a rather long and obscure way. Yet PSD, DNG and File info in PS show the same.
Could not recreate the Bridge metadata workspace from the OP because mine (Bridge CC) does not have the description field as an option anymore for some obscure reason. Also checked this in my CS6 version with same result, making the metadata workspace unusable but that was it already for a long time.
Still leaves us with the problem the OP showed, having all info in most files, as in Finder info, but not in Bridge. So could the OP respond to the purge cache for selection option in post 4?
Here are (a bit to many, sorry) my screenshots showing different file info (in Dutch but you will manage with that) and metadata in Bridge:
Finder info for PSD and DNG:
Finder info for CR2 and XMP:
File info Bridge / PSD:
And a Bridge Metadata view:

Purchase Order is not Picking Price from Info Record.

Dear All,
User had created a Shopping cart in and an automatic Purchase Order is created which is picking the material price from Purchase Requisition but not from Created Inforecord. As checked in P.R at item level it is found that in VALUATION tab there is a field named as " P.O PRICE " , here defalt t selected as " 1 A Gross Price "., Can u please help that from where this field is automatically selected as Gross Price in Purchase requisition.
Thanx n Rgds,
sap11

This is the config done in the OMET transaction where you will see the Adopt PO price field is checked and now this funcitonal authorization code e.g. 01 assgined to user profile in SU3 transaction agianst the parameter EFB.
if this is active than it will not take price from info record but it will copy from PR.
to avoid this kind of issue -
Remove the EFB value in SU3 for particular user or if user needs to have the EFB profile for some other requirements than go to OMET and remove Adopt po price indicator from that profile which is assigned to user

Inco terms not flowing in Purchasing Info record.

Hi ,
Eventhough I maintained Incoterms in Vendor master , while creating Purchasing Inforecord with the same vendor , Incoterms is not picking from the vendor master.
Kindly give the reason for this ........
regards,
YK

Hi Jurgen,
Thanks for ur reply. I have not maintained contract PO. Checked in other Purchasing Info record , Incoterms field value is not flowing in Purchasing Info record Eventhough I have maintained in all the vendor master.
regards,
Yogesh

Auto Purch Info Record.

Dear all,
We've customized for automatic creation of Purch Info record. So every PO is being recorded/ updated as Purch Info record. However, we want that although P. Info record shd be created automatically but only for certain material. Is it possible? How?
Thank you.

Hi,
If those materials are buyer specific you can default the info update chkbox only for these materials.
In customization go under the node:
SPRO->Materials Management->Purchasing->Environment data->Default values for buyers
Here you can set the indicator for info update, and maintain this default value for only those buyers whose material should create Pur. info. records.
Regards,
Prithviraj

Purch Info Record Update - Difference of Ctyp PBXX PB00

Hi Sap Gurus!
Would like to seek your help! When I am using Ctype PBXX in Purchase Order, Purchasing Info record Price is not updating but if Ctype PB00 is used Purchasing Info Record Price is updated after creation of Purchase Order.
What is the difference of Ctype PB00 and PBXX?
Please advice.

Follow this answered links
What is the difference between Condition Type PB00 and PBXX
Difference between PB00 and PBXX condition types?
PB00 and PBXX- Difference ?

Pricing not updated in Purchase Info Record using INFREC01. is it possible?

Hi Gurus,
I am using IDoc INFREC01 to create Purchase info record for material, but when I see in ME13 that PIR is created successfully but price is never updated, though I have populated field NETPR and EFFPR hence condition PB00 (basic pricing condition) not created.
Is it possible to update only single pricing (basic price PB00) condition through INFREC01 ??? or should I use another BAPI or some standard report ...??.
I am extending Pricing Conditions for Purchase inforec through seprate IDOC: COND_A01, but it could only do that if there is basic pricing condition i.e. PB00.
Please advice.
Thanks in advance.
Robin

HI,
You can update pricing field for conditon type PB00, please use correct validity period.
Even there are no basic Price condition PB00, you can add new condition types with existing types.
Price vaue can depend on the pricing conditions that you have maintained.
Thanks....

Not possible to maintain info record for MPN material

Dear All,
I m purchasing abc material from one vendor with different make. and maintaining same in purchase order like :
Material code            MPN number              rate
ABC                          reliance make              7
ABC                          L&T make                     6
ABC                          videocon make             5
I maintained source list , quota arrangement , purchase req. , schedule agreement MPN wise.
but i cant maintain info record MPN wise. info record generate with material code and not as per MPN number.
Pl suggest.
Vijay

Dear,
Check these links which explains in detail:
http://www.sap-img.com/materials/maintain-relation-between-alternatives-materials.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_di471/helpdata/en/75/ee15e055c811d189900000e8322d00/content.htm
Regards,
Syed Hussain.

Flag Purch info record

Hi Experts,
Can every one describe the Flag purchasing info record..
Thanks In Advance....
Kind Regards
Yogesh

Hi Yogesh,
As SantoshSP said if you do not want to use your info records (or extensions of them) you can mark them with DF and later you can archive them.
You can also use tr. ME15 directly to flag them.
For instance, your info record was created by mistake (e.g. through a PO), or it became obsolate you can get rid of it by marking it with DF.
Info records that are out of use may cause problems in your system (e.g. in case of costing or when you want to create PO from PurReq...depending on your settings of course...)
BR
Csaba

Updated xml schema not reflected in Import Manager and Syndicator

Hi all,
We have a perfectly running MDM scenario using custom XML schema for import and syndication. I have now updated the schema by adding a couple of fields to the schema and uploaded the new schema to MDM using Console - Admin - XML Schemas, and we have added the same fields in the repository. However, when I open Import Manager or Syndicator the xml schema is not updated, it is still showing the old version without the new fields. The fields added to the repository show up just fine.
I have searched around the forum and it suggests I actually have to re-create manually all mappings with the new schema?! I cannot believe this is really necessary and would mean massive amounts of work.
I have tried to export old maps and create new map with new schema. Then the new fields show up, but when I import the previously exported map the old schema returns and the new fields disappear.
Any help with this seemingly very odd behavior is very much appreciated!
Thanks,
Kenneth

Hi Kenneth, Aamir
the statement
> Uploading the XML schema in Console is mainly a placeholder, it not not synced with Import Manager or Syndicator schema at runtime.
is not completely true. You have to differentiate the MDM version and the tools:
MDM 7.1 Import Manager: uses the actual XSD of MDM Console
MDM 7.1 Syndicator: stores the XSD as part of the map and disregards the one in MDM Console
MDM 5.5 Import Manager: stores the XSD as part of the map and disregards the one in MDM Console
MDM 5.5 Syndicator: stores the XSD as part of the map and disregards the one in MDM Console
Best regards
Michael

I know the day and time of a conference call that took place b/w 2 Verizon customers and a 3rd party but it is not reflected in either phone record. Why?

I am an attorney with a law firm that is involved in litigation where the date and time of a 3 way call that took place in June 2009 between an attorney at my firm, a broker, and the broker's client. The broker and broker's client are both Verizon Wireless customers. I have their phone records for June 2009. I am 100% certain a three way phone call took place between the attorney in my firm, the broker, and broker's client. However there is no phone record that shows a phone call between all three individuals. .
The first Verizon Customer is a local real estate broker with a West Palm Beach, Florida phone number with a 561 area code. The other Verizon Customer is the broker's client and was in CT on both 6/24 and 6/25. The broker's cell phone records were reproduced by Verizon in 2014. I believe the client's cell phone records were reproduced by Verizon in 2013. The client has an 860 area code. The law firm is in Palm Beach County with a 561 area code. Any phone call from the law firm to the broker would be local and would only show up on the broker's cellphone record. Any phone call from the law firm to the broker's client (who was not a client of the law firm) would be reflected in the law firm's long distance records. There is no such phone call. The broker's cell phone records show a 10 minute phone call between the broker and the law firm at 2:24 p.m on 6/24. There is a 8 minute phone call from the broker to the law firm at 9:39 am on 6/25 and a 22 minute phone call from the law firm to the broker at 9:48 am. The broker's cellphone record shows that during the 9:48 phone call the broker attempted to perform a 3 way call with the client at 10:04 and again at 10:05. Each attempt lasts just 1 minute and neither shows up on the client's cell phone records. The phone call with the law firm and broker lasts an additional 4 minutes.
The broker's and client's cell phone records show a 10/11 minute phone call on 6/25 depending on the record at 8:41 am. There are numerous other phone calls between the broker and client on other days.
If the broker called the client then called the law firm, then the initial phone call should be reflected in both Verizon invoices, and the 2nd call should be reflected in the broker's record.
The same would be true if the client initiated the phone calls.
If the broker called the law firm or law firm called the broker, then called the broker's client the phone call should be reflected in the law firm's long distance records and the client's records. It is not. There is no documentation that shows the client was participating in a 3 way call.
My question is why not?   Alternatively, is it possible for the 3 way call not to be reflected in the records? I have the phone records of both customers. I also have the invoice number for the broker. How can I find out if the broker added the client to any of the above calls.

    Hi papal74. I am sure that this is a situation in which these call records are extremely important. In order to provide additional information about these call records we would need to speak with you personally. Please give us a call at 800-922-0204. This way we can get down to the bottom of this.
ErinW_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Conditions in Calculation Schema not reflecting in Purch Info Record

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for