Condition with mulitple Expressions

Question

I have the following file structure of an ORDERS05 Idoc and I need to setup conditions in the Receiver Determination to find the correct Interface Determination and Receiver Agreement.
sample File:
- <E1EDK14 SEGMENT="1">
  <QUALF>006</QUALF>
  <ORGID>10</ORGID>
  </E1EDK14>
- <E1EDK14 SEGMENT="1">
  <QUALF>007</QUALF>
  <ORGID>10</ORGID>
  </E1EDK14>
- <E1EDK14 SEGMENT="1">
  <QUALF>008</QUALF>
  <ORGID>1000</ORGID>
  </E1EDK14>
- <E1EDK14 SEGMENT="1">
  <QUALF>012</QUALF>
  <ORGID>ZPH1</ORGID>
  </E1EDK14>
I need to set a condition to these criteria
Option1:
E1EDK14 QUALF ‘012’ ORGID ‘ZPH1’ or
E1EDK14 QUALF ‘012’ ORGID ‘ZPH2’ or
E1EDK14 QUALF ‘012’ ORGID ‘ZC2’   and
if exsists E1EDK14 QUALF ‘019’ ORGID not equals ‘ZEDI’
--> this is the example case above
Option2 with a different map from Option1:
E1EDK14 QUALF ‘012’ ORGID ‘CCR’ and
E1EDK14 QUALF ‘019’ ORGID ‘ZEDI’
Option3 do not process these:
E1EDK14 QUALF ‘012’ ORGID ‘ZPH1’ or
E1EDK14 QUALF ‘012’ ORGID ‘ZPH2’ or
E1EDK14 QUALF ‘012’ ORGID ‘ZC2’   and
E1EDK14 QUALF ‘019’ ORGID equals ‘ZEDI’
Any idea if that can be setup in the Condition Editor ? I know a workaround would be to have a dummy map from ORDERS05 to ORDERS05 and write a single criteria in the Header, but that seems like too much overhead....
Thanks for  any help.

Answer 1

Hi Andrea,
   Ur conditions look a liitle complex. So u can determine ur rceiver at runtime by provicing the conditions in the mapping itself whr u can hv all combiations. This is called Extended Receiver determination. You can see the option in receiver dtermination itself.
Plz check he following link
<a href="/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16:///people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
But, there r options for checking existence of value in he simple receiver determination also. So u can check those and see if its possible with tht.
Regards,
Akshay
Message was edited by:
        Akshay Salunke