Confirmation of Dyanmic Bin with P Strategy

I hope my question will make sense. We are in the development phase of SAP WM implementation and have the following scenario in mind for putaway.
Use P Strategy so that the system will create a dynamic bin such as 01-002-10/A, 01-002-10/B, etc. Each bin is labeled with a check digit for confirmation scanning, but the Verify.fld in LS01N is only for the main bin (01-002-10). Our question is how do you confirm the bin section "/A, or /B"? If we physically label each section of a bin is there a way to scan that during confirmation?
Thanks for any feedback.

Our strategy for confirming putaway is planned to include the following steps...
Scan the Storage Unit
Scan the bin
Currently we have the bin master data set up with verification ID's for each bin in the warehouse. When using dynamic bins these get "split" into sections based on the storage unit type being placed in the bin.
For example, in our strategy, a SUT of M3 would create/use a bin of medium height that is split into 3 parts
01-234-20/A
01-234-20/B
01-234-20/C
The verification ID is only associated with the main bin (01-234-20) so when the operator places material in one of the sections there appears to be no way to tell the system that section A has it's own unique verification ID.
At this point we believe our solution could be one of the following:
1. Have the user scan the same Verification ID for each section
2. Physically label each potential section with a concatenation of the bin/section/verificationID and request development to create the program to use that information.
Any comments or suggestions?

Similar Messages

SAP WM: Mixed pallet with putaway strategy "P"

Dear Experts,
I am using putaway strategy P for a storage type and I have given X for Mixed storage field.
I am not able to put multiple batches of same material in one bin, is it possible with putaway strategy P
I am not using SU management.
Thanks in advance,
Amit Kumar

This is from a WM colleague:
First it will always look at same bin as a material is stored
with put away strategy “I”.
This scenario is completely wrong, if I understand it right.
He/she needs to look at the bin strategy for the SU types
defined in the LE qty. / SUT types for bin type.
Strategy “I” is for addition to stock like they said.
Capacity check 2 only works if it is SUT active, which they say it is
not. Not the check flag, but the SUT.
The strategy for SUT type allowed to bin type only works if it
is SUT managed, which they say it is not.
The strategy just doesn’t seem right. If they do not use
SU’s, the only capacity check that works is max from the material master (WM-1
view) weight “1”.
The bin type / SUT strategy will not work unless they are using
SUT’s for storage. Not just the LE qty. in the SUT defined.
If they aren’t using SUTs for storage, it is only a quant.
Noting is configurable for strategy of quant to storage bin type.

Putaway in Warehouse to Bin with same material but different batch

Hi Everyone,
I'd appreciate some help on this as I'm a bit perplexed.
When a Goods Receipt (MIGO) is being done we have a problem with the Stock not going to the correct Storage Bin. Basically we require to find a storage bin with the same material and add the receipted material to the storage bin.
However the system will not let us do this becuae the batch for the material is different and the system doesnt put the material away into the desired storage bin. Instead the system puts the material in Storage Type 902 with the PO number as the Storage Bin.
The functional consultant has asked me to implement a user exit to search for a storage bin with the same material as is being Goods Receipted and put the material in this bin. I have a problem with this becuase there is no TO being created once the MIGO is done so I dont know where to start on this problem.
To illustrate
1. Migo is done on Material 1234
2. A user exit should search for a bin already containing Material 1234 (ignoring batch) and add this receipted material to the bin.
Is this possible ??
Any help or suggestions is greatly appreciated. Thank you very your time.
Kind Regards
DK

HI,
I hope system will allow to store same material with different batch numbers in the same Bin.
System will treat it as separate quants in the Bin since Batch no: is different.
In this case you can try with Putaway strategy - I - addition to existing stock itself.
If you face any issue regarding Auto-TO creation, check the below link.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/f85c504afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm]
Also try to do a manual TO creation with reference to the TR in the above case in Simulation system so that you will be able to know the exact reason for the error.
Thanks & Regards,

Dynamic destination bin with Mov. Type 311-312 and Storage type 001?

Hello WM experts,
I'm tryng to determine dynamic destination bin with mov. type 311, when trasfering handling units from IM to WM storages (VLMOVE). First 311 transfer to St. type 921, and then 312 transfer from 921 to St. type 001. I don´t want to use a Fixed destination storage bin in St.type 001, I'd like to configure this like movement type 601, that create a dynamic destination bin using outbound delivery. Can be this possible?
Another question I have: Is possible to crearte individivual items with Source target quantity in alternate unit equivalent to 1 unit, in LT03. For example, the item 10 of my outbound delivery says 3 ST of XYZ material. But I want to crear 3 items with Source target qty. 1 ST. Is this possible with customizing or using an enhancement? ...
Why I want to find a way to do any of these things above, because when I have indivial intes in the TO, I can confirm them in RF (LM61) just pressing one button, I don't need to declare any difference, and makes my picking process faster.
Best regads, and thanks for you time and help.
Favio Del Castillo.

Hi Mohit ,
please check below link , you need to perform steps as given
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/4d/2b90b043ad11d189410000e829fbbd/content.htm
also see the sales order subcontracting using the business addon
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/c7/2587b8dad94c52854ccd28015dceb0/frameset.htm

Can someone confirm a possible bug with Universal Access?

Can someone confirm a possible bug with Universal Access?
I have a Mac Pro 3,1, 10.7.1 but if you could confirm or not this possible bug with any model.
In Energy Saver preference pane:
Set Mac to never sleep.
Set Display Sleep to ~2 minutes.
In Desktop & Screen Saver:
Set screen saver to start at ~1 minutes.
In Universal Access:
Check Enable access for assistive devices.
Check radio button Zoom to On.
Zoom in window not checked.
Confirm that Zoom works by pressing:
⌥⌘= (option, command, =).
Set screen back to normal by pressing ⌥⌘-.
Let screen sleep after screen saver starts.
Wake screen and see if ⌥⌘= still works.
Thanks … Ken

Other than the time intervals (smallest Screen Saver kick-in is 3 minutes), it works fine for me - at least I can still zoom in/out after waking the display.
Tested on two different MacBook Pro models in 10.7.1

Send purchase order e-mail with release strategy

Hi!!
I have a problem with sending e-mails in purchase order that are blocked with release strategy.
I create a purchase order that is block for the release strategy, then I release it. This is working OK, but I can't send an e-mail with this released puchase order, to do it, I have to modify something in the purchase order.
Somebody knows what is happening?
I would like to send e-mails without previous modification of the purchase order.
Thanks for your help.

Hi,
Purchase order via e-mail in SAP sys,the configurations and pre-requisites are follow:
1. You must maintain an e-mail address in the address in the vendor master.
2. The same applies to your own user master. You also have to specify an e-mail address there in order to identify the sender.
Note that it is not possible to change the e-mail address of the vendor via the SAP purchase order transaction (ME21N, ME22N, and so on). The system only uses the e-mail address of the vendor that is maintained in the vendor master!
3. For the output type for default values, a communication strategy needs to be maintained in the Customizing that supports the e-mail. You can find the definition of the communication strategy in the Customizing via the following path: (SPRO -> IMG -> SAP Web Application Server -> Basic Services -> Message Control -> Define Communication Strategy). As a default, communication strategy CS01 is delivered. This already contains the necessary entry for the external communication. Bear in mind that without a suitable communication strategy it is not possible to communicate with a partner via Medium 5 (external sending).
4. Use the standard SAP environment (program 'SAPFM06P', FORM routine 'ENTRY_NEU' and form 'MEDRUCK') as the processing routines.
5. In the condition records for the output type (for example, Transaction MN04), use medium '5' (External send).
6. You can use Transaction SCOT to trigger the output manually. The prerequisite for a correct sending is that the node is set correctly. This is not described here, but it must have already been carried out.
7. To be able to display, for example, the e-mail in Outlook, enter PDF as the format in the node.
For more details, check SAP note:191470
Regards,
Biju K

UPDATE to "Premiere Pro's #1 missing feature": Auto-Tagging Bins with Shortcuts

In a previous thread (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1179075?start=0&tstart=0) I suggested that Adobe give us FCPX and FCP7-style subclip creation.
I just got some new ideas that improve this previous FR:
AUTO-TAGGING BINS with user assignable SHORTCUTS
1. Creating an auto-tagging Bin could be as simple as adding a special character such as ‘#’ in front of its title. So for example, renaming a Bin from ‘Interviews’ to ‘#Interviews’ would automatically add the tag ‘Interviews’ to the metadata of all clips within it. Users could even add several auto-tags to a single Bin. For example, by naming a Bin ‘University #Interviews #Staff’, any clips added to that bin would automatically inherit the searchable metadata tags ‘Interview’ and ‘Staff’, but not ‘University’ since it doesn't have the ‘#’ symbol added in front of it.
2. Contrary to FCPX’s 'keyword collections' approach, my approach would also allow Bin/Sub Bin tagging hierarchies. Imagine the following Bin structure: A parent Bin named ‘Interviews’ containing 3 sub-Bins named ‘Staff’, ‘Students’ and ‘Sound bites’. Adding an auto-tag to the parent Bin, (e.g. changing the name to ‘#Interviews’) would automatically propagate that tag to the contents of all sub-Bins! The organizational power of this would be amazing!
3. At any time, a user could remove metadata tags from clips simply by dragging the clips out of an auto-tagging Bin, or by removing the auto-tag from the Bin itself.
4. Any number of Bins, whether enabled for auto-tagging or not, could be given keyboard shortcuts. Doing so could be as simple as selecting a new ‘Assign shortcut’ option from the Bin’s context menu, which would automatically bring up the ‘Keyboard Shortcuts’ window, with a new ‘Bins’ root folder twirled open and ready for use (in addition to the current root folders: ‘Application’, ‘Panels’ and ‘Tools’). For easy visual reference, this ‘Bins’ root folder would automatically be populated with the names of every Project Window Bin, in their current hierarchy. So, using the previous example, the Bin ‘Interviews’ would have a twirly arrow to twirl down/up its sub-Bins ‘Staff’, ‘Students’ and ‘Sound bites’.
5. Any time a user adds a shortcut to a bin, that shortcut would appear at the end of the Bin’s name (e.g. adding the shortcut ’2′ to the Bin ‘Interviews’ would result in the Bin’s name appearing like this: ‘Interviews {2}’). Thus users would always have a quick visual reference for remembering shortcuts.
6. These options would give users 4 great ways to add clips/sub-clips to Bins for sorting and/or auto-tagging:
Use a Bin’s shortcut to send a clip’s in/out range from the Source Monitor to the Bin.
Use a Bin’s shortcut to create sub-clips of 1 or more selected clips in the Timeline (something you can’t do in FCPX!)
Drag&drop a clip’s in/out range from the Source Monitor to a Bin.
Drag&drop 1 or more clips from the Timeline to automatically create subclips that inherit any present auto-tags.
IMHO, FCPX still has superior organizational tools vs PP, at the moment, but with the suggested features above, PP would truly one-up FCPX in this regard!
Hopefully all of this is clear. Thoughts? Comments?

In a previous thread (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1179075?start=0&tstart=0) I suggested that Adobe give us FCPX and FCP7-style subclip creation.
I just got some new ideas that improve this previous FR:
AUTO-TAGGING BINS with user assignable SHORTCUTS
1. Creating an auto-tagging Bin could be as simple as adding a special character such as ‘#’ in front of its title. So for example, renaming a Bin from ‘Interviews’ to ‘#Interviews’ would automatically add the tag ‘Interviews’ to the metadata of all clips within it. Users could even add several auto-tags to a single Bin. For example, by naming a Bin ‘University #Interviews #Staff’, any clips added to that bin would automatically inherit the searchable metadata tags ‘Interview’ and ‘Staff’, but not ‘University’ since it doesn't have the ‘#’ symbol added in front of it.
2. Contrary to FCPX’s 'keyword collections' approach, my approach would also allow Bin/Sub Bin tagging hierarchies. Imagine the following Bin structure: A parent Bin named ‘Interviews’ containing 3 sub-Bins named ‘Staff’, ‘Students’ and ‘Sound bites’. Adding an auto-tag to the parent Bin, (e.g. changing the name to ‘#Interviews’) would automatically propagate that tag to the contents of all sub-Bins! The organizational power of this would be amazing!
3. At any time, a user could remove metadata tags from clips simply by dragging the clips out of an auto-tagging Bin, or by removing the auto-tag from the Bin itself.
4. Any number of Bins, whether enabled for auto-tagging or not, could be given keyboard shortcuts. Doing so could be as simple as selecting a new ‘Assign shortcut’ option from the Bin’s context menu, which would automatically bring up the ‘Keyboard Shortcuts’ window, with a new ‘Bins’ root folder twirled open and ready for use (in addition to the current root folders: ‘Application’, ‘Panels’ and ‘Tools’). For easy visual reference, this ‘Bins’ root folder would automatically be populated with the names of every Project Window Bin, in their current hierarchy. So, using the previous example, the Bin ‘Interviews’ would have a twirly arrow to twirl down/up its sub-Bins ‘Staff’, ‘Students’ and ‘Sound bites’.
5. Any time a user adds a shortcut to a bin, that shortcut would appear at the end of the Bin’s name (e.g. adding the shortcut ’2′ to the Bin ‘Interviews’ would result in the Bin’s name appearing like this: ‘Interviews {2}’). Thus users would always have a quick visual reference for remembering shortcuts.
6. These options would give users 4 great ways to add clips/sub-clips to Bins for sorting and/or auto-tagging:
Use a Bin’s shortcut to send a clip’s in/out range from the Source Monitor to the Bin.
Use a Bin’s shortcut to create sub-clips of 1 or more selected clips in the Timeline (something you can’t do in FCPX!)
Drag&drop a clip’s in/out range from the Source Monitor to a Bin.
Drag&drop 1 or more clips from the Timeline to automatically create subclips that inherit any present auto-tags.
IMHO, FCPX still has superior organizational tools vs PP, at the moment, but with the suggested features above, PP would truly one-up FCPX in this regard!
Hopefully all of this is clear. Thoughts? Comments?

TO Confirmation. Handling units with multiple batches.

Hi all!!
I have a problem when i try to confirm an outbound TO with several positions. The problem is that the proposed handling unit is different than the original one. This problem only occurs when the handling unit has several batches, if there's only one this doesn't happen.
This is configured in the customizing of the movement(601), but I don't know why it doesn´t work with multiple batches.
Any idea?
Thanks a lot.

Hi!
I have had the same problem and I put a note to sap. Their answer was:
"As per my previous reply, the functionality you are requesting is not
available in the standard system. When processing a TO, each item is
confirmed line by line. There is no check on the remaining TO items
if there is remaining stock in the source HU."
Hope this help.
Regards,
Tatiana

Confirm Form Resubmission Title with the message

Hi,
We have website which has mobile support from Iphone when we use the website, after clicking on Login, its show a conformation
Confirm Form Resubmission Title with the message The page that you're looking for used information that you entered. Returning to that page might cause any action you took to be repeated. Do you want to continue?
Continue and Cancel button.
This happens only in Iphone device

Turns out that Firefox became a little more fussy about standards than IE. (Imagine that!!) Code created hidden inputs of type="text" , then called a javascript function and passed the values in the hidden inputs as parameters. The original code just passed the name of the input as a variable. The Firefox Webconsole then complained that the variable was not declared. Once I passed the variable.value, then the error went away, Firefox was happy, didn't break IE, so I'm happy.

IR 6570 fax TX report or "confirmation page" comes out with zeros.

Our office has a Image Runner 6570. It works fine, except for our Fax TX Report or confirmation page comes out with no info. THe Job No./ St. Time/ Usage T/ Pages all come out as zeros. The fax goes through to the reciepent, but we would like the cofirmation page to work as intended. We turned off the IR 6570, that didn't affect anything. We switched the Fax TX report seetings from off to error and on, but it still comes out as all zeros.
If anyone has had this issue or knows how to resolve it, a comment would be apreciated.

Hi CalebR!
Thanks for posting in the Canon Forum! Canon does not provide direct support for imageRUNNER series products, but your dealer will be able to help you! If you don't have a dealer, please call us at 1-800-OKCANON (652-2666) and we will be happy to provide dealers who are in your area.

LT10 "Immediate confirmation" of TO with Putaway strategy "C" Doesn't Work

Hi ,
We have WM with HU implemented for a Plant/ Sloc Combination.In Warehouse we have multiple storage types.
Putaway strategy "C' (Open storage) is implemented with SU in one of the storage type of warehouse.
If we try to make internal movement within this storage type using LT10 with option "Immediate Confirmation" (of TO) , it doesn't work and we have to use LT12 to confirm transfer order seperately.
This is happening only if we are opting QUANT VIEW in LT10.If we use STORAGE UNIT view in LT10 and transfer the material with IMMEDIATE confrimation , TO gets confirmed immediately.
Further , functionality of "Immediate confrimation" works perfectly if we use storage type with other put-away strategy like "NEXT EMPTY BIN"
Need your immediate help on this
Regards
Sandeep Marwha

Hi Sandeep,
In open storage , you have only one bin per storage section. You are also having SU. So quant view will not work, thats why Storage unit view is working. Moreover, please check if mixed storage is enabled. If not then it will not allow multiple SU to accomodate. Thats where the Next empty bin will work.
Thanks,
Mono
Edited by: Monodeep Sarker on Dec 28, 2010 8:46 PM

Purchase Order E-mailing with Release Strategy

Hello,
We are experiencing an issue when e-mailing a Purchase Order which has a release strategy. When the order is released, the confirmation e-mails are going to the person who releases it when it is supposed to go to the person who has created the P.O. We are using a Smartform P.O. based on /SMB11/BL_MM_PO_L and print program /SMB40/FM06P. I must note that there was a bug found in the aforementioned print program and before that was fixed e-mailing would not work at all.
We have also attempted to use all combinations of standard unmodified print programs and standard unmodified smartforms and have had no luck at getting the confirmation e-mail to send to the correct person this way either.
SAP has recommended that we use program SAPFM06P with form Medruck. While this combination does work correctly, Medruck is not a Smartform. Has anybody here used a smartform Purchase Order with a release strategy and had the confirmation e-mail send to the created and not the releasor?
Below is a list of the print programs and forms we have tried in various combinations. We are running ECC6/Basis 7
Print Programs:
/SMB11/FM06P
/SMB40/FM06P
SAPFM06P (Sapscript Only)
Forms:
/SMB11/BL_MMPO_L
/SMB11/MMPO_L
/SMB40/MMPO_L

Hi,
Purchase order via e-mail in SAP sys,the configurations and pre-requisites are follow:
1. You must maintain an e-mail address in the address in the vendor master.
2. The same applies to your own user master. You also have to specify an e-mail address there in order to identify the sender.
Note that it is not possible to change the e-mail address of the vendor via the SAP purchase order transaction (ME21N, ME22N, and so on). The system only uses the e-mail address of the vendor that is maintained in the vendor master!
3. For the output type for default values, a communication strategy needs to be maintained in the Customizing that supports the e-mail. You can find the definition of the communication strategy in the Customizing via the following path: (SPRO -> IMG -> SAP Web Application Server -> Basic Services -> Message Control -> Define Communication Strategy). As a default, communication strategy CS01 is delivered. This already contains the necessary entry for the external communication. Bear in mind that without a suitable communication strategy it is not possible to communicate with a partner via Medium 5 (external sending).
4. Use the standard SAP environment (program 'SAPFM06P', FORM routine 'ENTRY_NEU' and form 'MEDRUCK') as the processing routines.
5. In the condition records for the output type (for example, Transaction MN04), use medium '5' (External send).
6. You can use Transaction SCOT to trigger the output manually. The prerequisite for a correct sending is that the node is set correctly. This is not described here, but it must have already been carried out.
7. To be able to display, for example, the e-mail in Outlook, enter PDF as the format in the node.
For more details, check SAP note:191470
Regards,
Biju K

Sales order qty not confirmed when delivery done with partial qty

Hi Guru's
Need your help............
We have issue in drop shipment scenario process. Sales order created with 10 line items from CRM and order released from CRM and replicated order to ECC and backend created PR also. After that user set reject status for all items so that PR line items also deleted, again user released rejection status for all items and line items updated in the same PR with different line item number for materials then PO & GR also done in ECC and stock also allocated for sales order line items but still sales order qty not confirmed in CRM sales order.
I checked all configurations regarding availability check but could not found.
Example:
Sales order line item qty: 4 - 2 qty confirmed (delivered).
For remaining qty (2 items)I have done GR. After GR It is allocated to sales order but it is not confirming the order quantity.
plz help me to fix this issue?
regards
sai

Hi,
Please check In ERP transaction OVZJ, for the sales org, distribution channel, and division that is being used in the affected sales orders, set the Avail. Check Rule to 'E'. Then retest the issue, as this might help.
Regards
Gavin

Confirmation of service PO with multiple line item

Hi SAP Experts,
We are using SRM 7EhP1(classic scenario).
I have a question regarding confirmation of service shopping carts/POs with several line items.
We created a SC (and successively a PO) with N service positions.
When we try to create a SRM confirmation, it seems that we can only confirm one position at a time.
For material SC, in the list of SCs open for confirmation we have a line for each shopping cart, and you can create a single confirmation for the whole shopping cart.
On the contrary, for service SC we have a line for each SC line. In this case, we cannot process all the lines in a single confirmation, but we need to create multiple confirmations.
Is that correct? Is there a way to confirm at the same time all the service positions of the SC?
Thanks!
Cinzia

Hello Cinzia,
Regarding creating service confirmations we can create only one confirmation for one line item of SC. If there are N line items we have to create N confirmations. This is because activation of Service bundling switch in SRM and this switch is irreversible. This switch is a facility/convenience for SRM PO's replicated to ECC to view all service line items in ECC without bundling. This scenario happens for both Service and Limit items.
I hope service bundling switch in your SRM system 7 EHP1 is activated.
There is no other way to create service confirmations for all items at one go.
We do have this inconvenience and raised this concern with SAP and no reply.
Hope, this answers your question.
Best Regards,
Kalyan

Confirmation of production orders with several operations

Hello,
I am using transaction CO11 in order to perform confirmation of Production orders that has 3 operations...
with this transaction, I have to enter 3 times the transaction for each operation...
could you please tell me a transaction where I can make the confirmation for all operations in one step ? ( a kind of screen where I can access all operations and manage the hours and quantities before saving.)
thanks and regards

Dear,
How many such orders would you come across everyday for the confirmation to happen?
Does the operation sequence remain the same across all the orders?
Then,i would like to suggest a method,Im not sure how it can be adopted to your scenario
Try this!!
We can group all the production orders on daily basis or in shift basis in a EXCEL spreadsheet.
Through a BDC,we can migrate the information on a daily basis to SAP.
Regards,
Joseph Charles vaikathussery

Confirmation of Dyanmic Bin with P Strategy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for