Consistency Check Rules settings

Does anybody know how to change (turn on and off) the consistency check rules?
It was possible in OBIEE10g via the Options tab in the Consistency Check Manager window. See here: [url https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B9EGCSsYeJdeZWM5ZDI5MTctNGY5MS00YTVhLWJmZmItN2M3MTkzYzQzMGYw&sort=name&layout=list&num=50] CCM10g.png
But now in the OBIEE11g there is no such a tab any more: See here: [url https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B9EGCSsYeJdeZWRhZWExNWQtZjcwMi00MzQ2LThiOWItNGM1ZTNmN2NjNzhl&sort=name&layout=list&num=50] CCM11g.png
There is no corresponding information in the documentation.
Thanks

Looks like you learned something from this
Consistency Check of RPD without opening it
I expect you mark or update on this before you post any thing.
Try out if you can call any batch files from Answers, I dont think you call them.
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on May 13, 2013 11:19 AM

Similar Messages

Check the settings for checking group 02 and checking rule BO

Hi,
I am doing Backorder processing for order , I am getting the error as follows,
I have checked Checking Rule For Updating Backorders. Everything ok.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Pramod

One Probable reason for you error.
Check the TC: OVZ2 whether you have ticked the Block qty req. for the Checking group 02 or you have selected No checks.
The standard setting for 02 should not have any tick..
or _Check in the TC : se38 program : SAPLOPP3.
Check whether you have defined the plants with the checking rule BO.
This must be your error._
reward points if helpful,
regards,
Amlan Sarkar

Determination of checking Rule in sales order

Dear all,
how the checking rule is determined in sales order av.check, In the t code OPJJ we are maintained so many checking rule for one checking group, In the sales order how the system determines the checking rule,
I am expecting positive feedback from your end .
Best Regards,
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
You will have to maintain the checking group default for Material Type & Plant in Customization.
You can assign the plant & the checking rule for processing Back order Processing.
You can set default values for the relevant sales area & the availability checking rule.
You will have to assign the requirement class to reqirement type.
Maintain the avbl. check & TOR for the relevant schedule line.
These settings need to be done for the avbl. check to be performed at the sales order level.
Hope this will help you.
Thanks & Regards
Krishna Mohan

Errors occur during executing consistency checks

Hi all,
During my phase"executing consistency checks", errors occur :
X_STXH| Sender structure S_STXB is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXB.
It happened in PC001_PCL_CHECK sub-activity.
The details as follows:
ubactivity PC001_PCL_CHECK was started on 08.03.2009 at 22:10:02 by user LEEE03 | |
Check COBJ started at 08.03.2009 22:10:30 by LEEE03
Check COBJ finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:04 by LEEE03
Check HIER started at 08.03.2009 22:11:04 by LEEE03
Check HIER finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:04 by LEEE03
Check RELS started at 08.03.2009 22:11:04 by LEEE03
X_STXH
Sender structure S_STXB is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXB
X_STXH
Sender structure S_STXB is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXB
X_STXH
Sender structure S_STXB is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXB
X_STXH
Sender structure S_STXL is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXL
X_STXH
Sender structure S_STXL is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXL
X_STXH
Sender structure S_STXL is not assigned to the receiver structure R_STXL
Check RELS finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:20 by LEEE03
Check RULE started at 08.03.2009 22:11:20 by LEEE03
Check RULE finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:29 by LEEE03
Check DICT started at 08.03.2009 22:11:29 by LEEE03
X_STXH
Field TDNAME does not exist in the sender structure on sender system
X_STXH
Field TDOBJECT does not exist in the sender structure on sender system
X_STXH
Field TDID does not exist in the sender structure on sender system
X_STXH
Field TDNAME does not exist in the sender structure on sender system
X_STXH
Field TDOBJECT does not exist in the sender structure on sender system
X_STXH
Field TDID does not exist in the sender structure on sender system
Check DICT finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:29 by LEEE03
Check FIMA started at 08.03.2009 22:11:29 by LEEE03
Check FIMA finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:31 by LEEE03
Check RUMA started at 08.03.2009 22:11:31 by LEEE03
Check RUMA finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:31 by LEEE03
Check SELS started at 08.03.2009 22:11:31 by LEEE03
Check SELS finished at 08.03.2009 22:11:33 by LEEE03
Subactivity PC001_PCL_CHECK was completed on 08.03.2009 at 23:11:40 with status ERR
I have searched in sap marketplace and also google, no results come out.
Could anybody help me out?
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Eric Lee

I've implemented the note 1101544 in the central system
executed the report Z_CNVTDMS_08_FIELD_SET with P_PHASE to 'S'.
and after this, I re-executed the activity "Execute Consistency Checks" from the extended mode of the process tree several times.
But it remains the same issue.
Did I miss anything?

Checking rule

Hi,
I am getting this error. Can some one elaborate.
Order type XP01 plant 10XX: No checking rule maintained for operation
Release of order not possible
What settings have I missed?

Hi,
Did you read my reply for the same? Despite making those settings are you getting the error?
Regards,
Vivek

Availabilty check rule during STO Delivery

Hi guys,
I have one requirement. As per our business process, all materials have to be posted in QI stock, so setting in Purchasing view has already been done. Now when we are creating STO DO by TA - VL10B, it gives error while creating DO when U stock is zero.
We have checked settings in availability check rule , TA - OMJJ for our availability check and checking rule 'B' for Delivery Here the check box "include Q stock" is deactivated. We don't want to activate it as it will affect SD processes.
We dont want to use transfer posting for QI stock to U.
Can you guys please give me some other alternative to archive this??

To assign Delivery type to checking rule :
Goto SPRO->Materials AMnagement-> Purchasing->Purchase Order->Se Up stock transport Order-> Asssign Delivery type and checking Rule.
Here you can assign your required Checking rule to the delivery type .
To change the behaviour of the message : Note the message Number from the transaction and search for it in
Purchasing->Environment Data-> Define Attributes of sstem messages .
Here you can change from E(Error) to W(Warning) mesage.
Raviraj

SELS error during consistency checks. Fieldname not found in sender

I'm stuck in the System Analysis section, after starting programs for Generation and Reveiver settings. The task "Execute Consistency Checks" returns an error in PC001_PCL_CHECK.
Check SELS started at 16.06.2011 14:38:31
Errors detected for conversion object A910 :
A910:Fieldname VKORG of structure S_A910 mentioned in selref not found in sender
Check SELS finished at 16.06.2011 14:39:00
The help says:
The selection field mentioned for the reduction of this conversion object does not exist in the sender system. Thus this selection field can not be used for reduction. Please remove the assignment of this conversion object from reduction. For further assistance please contact SAP support.
My question is simply HOW? Where can I remove this object? I don't even find a structure called S_A910 in any of my systems. I have table A910 but it doesn't have a field called VKORG in it at all... I'm somewhat lost here.
I've added the latest SPs (17) and also applied all the notes. At least I think I applied them all... I repeated the step several times, no luck.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
Stefan

Hi Sandeep,
Many thanks for your reply. The note hasn't fixed the issue so I'm still stuck with the exact same error. I did run it as described and while the report updated a few fields, it didn't help to eliminate the error. Reading the note it would appear that the error described there is different from what I'm facing.
> error message like : "TVKOV: member ID_VKORG of group G_VK has no selref field!
I am getting "Fieldname of structure S_A910 mentioned in selref not found in sender" so to me it looks like a different issue.
Oh well... Nothing like a bit of fun.

Check rule in invoice plan

Hi,
    please revert back , how i should create the "Check rules" for invoice plan. and cutomizing "Terms of Payment key" (tcodes).
Thanks&Regards,
Benge

Hi there,
Please look at the documentation on how to set up the duplicate invoice
check -
SPRO ->
   MM ->
    LIV ->
     Incoming invoice ->
      Set check for duplicate invoices
Please also see note 394316.
Please understand that the standard 'duplicate invoice check' looks at
the following fields.
1) Company code....Configurable     4) Currency.....Always checked
2) Document date...Configurable     5) Vendor.......Always checked
3) Reference.......Configurable     6) Amount.......Depending on
                                                    Reference field
Only the Company code, Document date, and Reference fields are
configurable in transaction OMRDC as to whether or not the system looks
at these three fields along with the Currency, Vendor, and Amount.
If they are checked, the duplicate invoice check considers them. If
none are checked, then the system only looks at the Currency, Vendor,
and Amount.
If you activate the reference document number in IMG,
Depending on the reference document number entry,the system checks
as follows:
1. If you have entered a reference document number,the system checks
whether the invoice matches in the following attributes:
   Company code
   Vendor
   Currency
   Invoice date
   Reference document number
2. If you have not entered a reference document number, the system
checks whether the invoice matches in the following attributes:
   Company code
   Vendor
   Currency
   Invoice date
   Amount in document currency
Depending on the system settings, a warning message or an error
message appears if the system finds an invoice that matches all
attributes.
Please also keep in mind:The field Chk double inv. (Check for duplicate
invoice) must be flagged on the Accounting view in the vendor master
record.
The check is done in FM MRM_DUPLICATE_INVOICE_CHECK so you may be
able to look at it closer through the code
From release 4.7 or higher, BADI MRM_HEADER_CHECK is available to
make such check ( note 1156325).
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Matthew

Importance of Global Consistency check

Hello,
I have always checked my rpd for global consistency without knowing the actual meaning behind it. But last night I created a logical column with the following expression:
max(VALUEOF(NQ_SESSION......))
basically i created an aggregation over a logical column that obtains its value from session variable. I know that if we need to use a column as an aggregation column we should use the aggregation tab in the column properties. When we choose an aggregation it disables the editable column formula field.
I put the above formula which violates the rule. The result is perfect so long as I don't check for global consistency. It throws an error that looks something like this:
[38083] The Attribute 'Acceptance Rate Target' defines a measure using an obsolete method.
The question is.. what is the significance of global consistency check.. and what is the consistency criteria.. and is it ok to save the rpd without checking for global consistency (yes this does not cause the BI server to crash when trying to start)
Thanks

First, forget about the variable approach.
Now you need to do the following steps:
1) Import the table to the physical layer
2) Create logical table in existing Business Model in BMM layer with the imported table as logical table source
3) Create another logical table in existing Business Model in BMM layer with the imported table as logical table source
4) Create complex join between both table, now you will get one logical dimension table and one logical fact table
5) In the logical fact table you need to select the column ("Target") and add an aggregation rule, like MAX or MIN
6) Assuming you have a hierarchy for every dimension in your BMM layer, you need to set the logical levels of the new measure to the Grand Total Level of each dimension hierarchy.
By doing this, you get a "level based measure", for more info: read this:
http://oraclebizint.wordpress.com/2007/12/03/oracle-bi-ee-101332-level-based-measures-lbms/
By setting all logical levels to the grand total level, the measure will be "immune" for all dimensions used in your report.
So when you have a report like
Month__Actual___Target
The BI Server will create two queries:
select month, sum(sales) from calendar, sales_table where calendar.id = sales_table.calendar_id
and
select max(value) from target_table
The BI Server will then stitch both results together.
Regards,
Stijn

How to resolve "Performance counter registry hive consistency check" failed?

I want to install SQL Server 2008 November CTP Developer Enu. When "System Configuration Check" it shows:
Rule "Performance counter registry hive consistency check" failed.
The performance counter registry hive is corrupted.
And cannot continue installing. How to solve this problem?

I've actually solved the problem for my Vista and Win 7 (traditional chinese version).
After revising %systemroot%\system32\WmiApRpl.ini:
"[info]
drivername=WmiApRpl
symbolfile=WmiApRpl.h
[languages]
004=Chinese (Traditional)
009=English
[objects]
WMI_Objects_004_NAME=WMI Objects
WMI_Objects_009_NAME=WMI Objects
MSiSCSI_ConnectionStatistics_00000_004_NAME=iSCSI Connections
MSiSCSI_ConnectionStatistics_00000_009_NAME=MSiSCSI_ConnectionStatistics
MSiSCSI_InitiatorInstanceStatistics_00001_004_NAME=iSCSI Initiator Instance
MSiSCSI_InitiatorInstanceStatistics_00001_009_NAME=MSiSCSI_InitiatorInstanceStatistics
MSiSCSI_InitiatorLoginStatistics_00002_004_NAME=iSCSI Initiator Login statistics
MSiSCSI_InitiatorLoginStatistics_00002_009_NAME=MSiSCSI_InitiatorLoginStatistics
MSiSCSI_MMIPSECStats_00003_004_NAME=iSCSI HBA Main Mode IPSEC Statistics
MSiSCSI_MMIPSECStats_00003_009_NAME=MSiSCSI_MMIPSECStats
MSiSCSI_NICPerformance_00004_004_NAME=MSiSCSI_NICPerformance
MSiSCSI_NICPerformance_00004_009_NAME=MSiSCSI_NICPerformance
MSiSCSI_QMIPSECStats_00005_004_NAME=iSCSI HBA Quick Mode IPSEC Statistics
MSiSCSI_QMIPSECStats_00005_009_NAME=MSiSCSI_QMIPSECStats
MSiSCSI_RequestTimeStatistics_00006_004_NAME=iSCSI Request Processing Time
MSiSCSI_RequestTimeStatistics_00006_009_NAME=MSiSCSI_RequestTimeStatistics
MSiSCSI_SessionStatistics_00007_004_NAME=iSCSI Sessions
MSiSCSI_SessionStatistics_00007_009_NAME=MSiSCSI_SessionStatistics
ProcessorPerformance_00008_004_NAME=處理器效能
ProcessorPerformance_00008_009_NAME=ProcessorPerformance
Video_Scheduler_Statistics_00009_004_NAME=Video Scheduler
Video_Scheduler_Statistics_00009_009_NAME=Video_Scheduler_Statistics"
I have realized that the code 009 is for english language and 004 for chinese traditional and in my "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows
NT\CurrentVersion\Perflib" did only exist 009 and 0404 key.
Hence, i've created a new 004 key and copied 009 counter and help contents to this newly created key.
Without restarting the OS, I was able to install smoothly MS SQL server express RC2.
I'm so happy to have overcome this problem.
But just out of curiosity does anyone know the syntax for the language codes? (009 for English, 004 for Chinese and 0404?

TDMS consistency check error

We are having problem at "consistency check for the rules".The
rules have been check and all are in green.i remember that SAP has
asked us to check tables CNVMBTRULEINCL and CNVMBTRULEFIPARS right? im
able to browse table CNVMBTRULEINCL but not CNVMBTRULEFIPARS. the error
message shows this table is not active, and i cant even open the table
in SE11/SE16/sm30.
the error message is as below:
x_ekpo|the rule import paramter im_bstyp will not be available for this object.
the same set of rule was used for first client(miq400), but this time its not working for second client(miq485) ..
the source and destination are the same for the first and second client.
thanks

the issue has been fixed in 0799873 2010

What is the Difference between Checking Rule B and RP

Hi Experts,
Can anybody Explain the Difference between Checking Rule B and RP
in Intercompany STO (between Company Codes) which one should i be use?
in standard settings of IDES system i found B assigned to PO Type NB. but somewhere in forum i saw checking rule RP to be assigned to NB. i totally confused. please help me.
In below Assignments which one is correct.........
NB (PO Type) - 1200 (Supplying Plant) - NLCC (Delivery Type) - B (Checking Rule)
NB (PO Type) - 1200 (Supplying Plant) - NLCC (Delivery Type) - RP (Checking Rule)
Thanks in Advance,
charysd
Edited by: charysd on Aug 2, 2011 12:32 PM

hi..
By default checking rule B is assigned to PO doc type...
In B...only delivery rule is considered..
while in RP..delivery time..lead time...transpotation time are added..
Hope it will help.
Thnks.

Execute Consistency Checks - Sub-activity - PC001_PCL_CHECK I have error

Hello!
I use TDMS version 3.0 SP 17. Process Type - ERP Initial Package for Time based & Company Code Reduction.
In phase System Analysis - Start Programs for Generation and Receiver Settings - Execute Consistency Checks - Sub-activity - PC001_PCL_CHECK I have error:
Errors detected for conversion object TVKOV :
TVKOV: member ID_VKORG of group G_VK has no selref field!
Errors detected for conversion object TWPA :
TWPA: member ID_WERKS of group G_WE has no selref field!
Errors detected for conversion object TWRF2 :
TWRF2: member ID_BUKRS of group G_BU has no selref field!
and
Errors detected for conversion object MARV :
MARV: member ID_BUKRS of group G_BU has no selref field!
What should I do?
Thank you.
Best regards,
Denis Gaykov

Hello!!
I've implemented SAP note 1536915 but don't corrected the problem. I still have errors of type:
Errors detected for conversion object MARV :
MARV: member ID_BUKRS of group G_BU has no selref field!
Errors detected for conversion object TVKOV :
TVKOV: member ID_VKORG of group G_VK has no selref field!
Errors detected for conversion object TWPA :
TWPA: member ID_WERKS of group G_WE has no selref field!
Errors detected for conversion object TWRF2 :
TWRF2: member ID_BUKRS of group G_BU has no selref field!
Thanks.

ATP: check rule AE in place of A when creating sales document

Hello,
when creating a sales order in the sand box, the ATP check rule was "A".
when creating a sales oorder in the development box, the ATP check rule is AE.
The product, the order type, the ATP configuration are completely similar.
I red on the forum that the check rule is determined by the system without any customizing reason.
But in this case, there must be a reason explaining why the system wants us to make assembly order as we do not use PP.
So do you have any idea how this check rule is determined?
Thank you,
Yann

Man I've been trying to figure this out all day. Luckily for you there is a person here who knows more than I do and he was gracious enough to answer my questions. The long & short of it is there is no assignment you can configure or change, the Check Rule is an internal assignment (hard coded) based on the MRP and requirements settings of the material. If you are getting AE then you are using a make-to-order material. Try a different material... one that is not replenishment, consignment or make to order. If you're getting a different rule in 2 different systems with the same materials please share the MM settings of each and we can explore the differences.
This is about as deep as you can get into ATP. Good stuff!

Changing the sales order checking rule

Hi all,
Is there any way to change the checking rule of a sales order type?
Thanks

Hi
Is there any way to change the checking rule of a sales order type?
The answer is NO
Checking rule is picked by the system internally and that is transaction based like a sales order creation picks checking rule A that is SD sales order and a deliveryer creation picks checking rule B that is SD delivery
If your sales order item category is marked with spcial stock indicator like these E orders on hand ,Q project stock or W
consignment stock then while creating sales order creation that is VA01 transaction the checking rule will be AE or AQ or AW
It the item category special stock indicator is blank like TAN then system will pick simply A as checking rule during sales order creation
So the item category settings also play a role but not the order type
During delivery creation that is VL01 transaction it will be simply B or BE or BW or BQ
Regards
Raja

Consistency Check Rules settings

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for