Determination of checking Rule in sales order

Dear all,
how the checking rule is determined in sales order av.check, In the t code OPJJ we are maintained so many checking rule for one checking group, In the sales order how the system determines the checking rule,
I am expecting positive feedback from your end .
Best Regards,
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
You will have to maintain the checking group default for Material Type & Plant in Customization.
You can assign the plant & the checking rule for processing Back order Processing.
You can set default values for the relevant sales area & the availability checking rule.
You will have to assign the requirement class to reqirement type.
Maintain the avbl. check & TOR for the relevant schedule line.
These settings need to be done for the avbl. check to be performed at the sales order level.
Hope this will help you.
Thanks & Regards
Krishna Mohan

Similar Messages

Availability Checking Rule in Sales Order- Urgent....

Hi Gurus,
I m PP Consultant, I want to know How Checking rule is populated whilr creating Sales Order.
e.g - I am creating sales order for the MTS material then availability checking rule A must be come. & same for MTO I think AE should come.
please revert back soon. Hey Gurus Plz help me out its urgent ticket
thanks & regards, points will be rewarded yaar...
Anant.
Edited by: anant joshi on May 29, 2008 8:17 AM
Edited by: anant joshi on May 29, 2008 11:20 AM

Availibility checking rule populates from the availibilty maitined in your material master.
i.e 01 Daily requirements
     02 Individual requirements
If you go to transaction OVZ9
you will see the assignment of checking rule against 01 & 02.
e.g 01 A SD order
      01 B SD Delivery
      01 AE Make to order Stock
I Think This will clear your doubt.
Reward If useful
Regards
Rasik

Availability checking rule for sales orders

Hi experts,
To meet our useru2019s requirement I have switched off the availability check at the schedule line category level. But when I created a sales order the AVC is still happening. Upon checking I have noticed the availability checking group as u201C02u201D and checking rule as u201CBu201D in sales order. To my understanding the checking rule should be u201CAu201D for all sales orders. Could you please advise as to why it is happening so?

Hi,
I have done as what suggested and I created a new sales order. Upon checking (Sales screen --} environment --} availability) the availability checking group is 02 and checking rule is B. Please note that for the other sales document types we have, the checking group is 02 and checking rule is A

Changing Availability Checking Group in Sales Order.

Hello Gurus:
We changed the checking group in the material master. The existing sales orders still shows the earlier checking group. So how to change the checking group in existing sales order also (after it is changed in material master). Also, once the checking group in sales order is changed, how to de-commit and re-commit material as per the new checking group. Thanks.
- Chetan

Chetan,
As you have changed Checking Group in MMR later on all ur availability check etc will be calculated as per previous MMR settings..
Still go to OVZ9...See if your sales order has correct Check rule/Group..
Then Go to sales order Carry out availability check again...See if Avalability Overview has changes as per your new Check Rule..
Also Do Some R & D...
Like test with change in quantity of line items...save and carry out avalability check gain..See if schedule line dates in Sales order Is there any change?
See if any change is there...
If not better create new sales order...it will minimise your efforts and will be quicker way..
REWARD IF U FINDS THIS AS USEFUL...
Regds
MM

COGS determination for Free of cost sales order

Hi All,
We have an issue regarding the COGS determination for Free of cost sales order. We created a free of cost sales order. But i need to know whether this sales order items will hit to COGS or not? If so how do i check whetehr its has been charged to COGS or not? and we have an issue raised saying thst one material in this sales order has not being charged to COGS. So please help me to solve this issue. Ihave checked the account assignment in GBB-VAX. And is there anyting to do with the settlement profile for COGS determination?.
Thanks and regards
Uday

Hi,
During PGI a material document and accounting doc gets created which would hit COGS account.
You're talking about one specific sales order in which for one material it didn't hit COGS account or any order you're creating now with that material has an issue? If its a specific material which has an issue always..then something is wrong with that material master setup. Also you can go to the reported Sales order--doc flow to the PGI document and check the accounting doc and if its not posted..check the analysis why its not posted?
And if its one off then I would suggest 2 options:
1) Reverse the goods movement, cancel the delivery or if billing has already been done..cancel the billing as well. And re-do the cycle. This always ensures correct posting.--> Recommended option.
2) Manual adjustment in FI.
And settlement profile is Controlling concept..not sure you would get any help on this in this forum.
Regards
RS

Retaining the old schedule lines after the ATP check in the sales order....

Hi Experts,
I would like to retain the old schedule lines after the ATP/GATP check in the sales order for certain conditions.
I don't want to change XVBEP,IVBEP,VBEP contents in the user-exit..
Is there any standard sub-routine or function module to reatain old schedule lines in the sales order so that the schedule lines will not update with the new values after the ATP check ?
Thanks
Rayudu

In Include LV03VFMM, you have:
* Userexit availability
PERFORM USEREXIT_AVAILABILITY_IN USING DA_ATPPR.
There may be an option to implement some logic in here. However, I tried changing the value of MVERF_POS-EINTEIL[1]-VFPKZ to initial. This will ensure that when FM AVAILABILITY_CHECK_CONTROLLER is called that the following IF statement is untrue:
CHECK NOT P_ATPCSX[] IS INITIAL.
as P_ATPCSX[] Table[0x648].....
However, this will just mean that the 2nd confirmed schedule line (assuming we have > 1 schedule lines) will have a confirmed quantity to zero.
EXIT_SAPLATPC_001 could also be used. However, when I removed the "X" from CHKFLG, I get the same result; the 2nd schedule line will revert to zero.
They were the only tests I tried; I cannot think of any other ways around this....

Item Partners Check box in Sales Order

Hi all,
What is the functionality and configuration settings of Item Partners Check box in sales order, partner function tab line item level?
When i find the check box marking then it allows me changes by double clicking of the partner and changing the address, but when the same check box is not marked then it is in dispaly mode when i double click it.
So please suggest me how to control its features.
Thanks in Advance,
Cheers,
Anil.

Hello,
If this indicator is activated, the partner is validated at item level.
It may happen that in a business transaction the partner in the document header does not apply to all items, for example, if specific goods for a customer are normally delivered to another ship-to party.
In sales documents and billing documents you can enter one of the deviating partners from the document header at item level.
When creating a document , the system copies the document header partners to the items. If you want to define another partner than the one in the document header at item level, overwrite the proposal from the item partner screen.
Prase

MM Account determination with valuated/non valuated sales order stock!

Hi All,
I have been trying to set up MM account determination in our project for sales order assigned POs.What I have observed is that when I have a PO with sales order assignment and according to requirement class (coming through reqt type) in sales order it is valuated sales order stock then in the PO we get the stock account determined through BSX key. But when it is non valuated sales order stock we get a different account assigned through GBB-VKA key. In both the cases the account assignment category in the PO is "E".
Can someone please explain what is the connection between valuated/non valuated sales order stock and MM account determination and if what is happening is right from account determination point of view?
Regards,
V S

These are two different postings:
BSX: stock posting
GBB: Offsetting entry for stock posting
Stock posting (BSX)
This transaction is used for all postings to stock accounts. Such
postings are effected, for example:
-   In inventory management in the case of goods receipts to own
    stock and goods issues from own stock
-   In invoice verification, if price differences occur in
    connection with incoming invoices for materials valuated at
    moving average price and there is adequate stock coverage
-   In order settlement, if the order is assigned to a material with
    moving average price and the actual costs at the time of
    settlement vary from the actual costs at the time of goods
    receipt
Offsetting entry for stock posting (GBB)
Offsetting entries for stock postings are used in Inventory
Management. They are dependent on the account grouping to which each
movement type is assigned. The following account groupings are
defined in the standard system:
-   VKA:     for sales order account assignment
         (for example, for individual purchase order)

How to check how many sales orders are pending

Dear experts,
I would like to know in Sap what is the process to chech how many orders are still pending. I know some std tcodes for it I am little confused. Kindly help me how to find out.

Hi,
Goto the T.Code "VA05".
Give the date range and also enter the sold-to-party.
Tick the check box "Open Sales orders".
Enter.I will gives you the list of orders that are open means pending.
You can also use the T.Code "VA05n".
Here also tick the check box "Open orders".
Enter the document type etc...
Execute.Here also you will get the open orders.
Regards,
Krishna.

Checking Rule for Process Order

Hi Guys
I am using the standard checking rule for Process Order while releasing. This rule considers the quality blocked stock also as available stock and thus release the Process Order.
However the client does not want to include the quality block stock for process order. My question is:
1. If I create a checking rule which does not consider quality stock as available, and attach it to release of Process Order, will it make any change in MRP run?
2. Is there a means to show a warning message while release of process order to show the stock is in quality block state?
3. Is there any other means to alarm or warn the user before release of Process order about the material quality block state?
Appreciate you help / suggestion on this
Thanks in advance
Rahul

Hi,
Regards the stocks during MRP run, you can do it in tow areas
1. In OPPI, you can define whether Stockin transfer/blocked/restricted stocks can be taken into account for MRP run.
2. You can exclude storage locations in MRP run and assign the MRP storage location indicator as 1 in MRP 4 view.
Apart from this the MRP will consider all stocks and requirements.
If you don't want to consider QI stock (for ex) then you can convert them as blocked stocks or you can move to a storage location which is not assigned to the MRP.
Thanks,
JK

Credit Limit check on Delivery:: Sales order blocked

Dear Friends,
We have implemented credit limit check with delivery Block option in Sales order. After revising Credit limit, while user is creating Delivery again, system prompts for Delivery Block in Sales order i.e, reson for Block is Credit limit in Sales Order. then user removes resason and proceeds further.
Is there any way by which system doesn't put reason for rejection in sales order and just not allow to create delivery in system. i.e. we want to remove the step of removing reason from sales order.
Regards Krishan Raheja

Dear Krishan,
As per my understanding you require just a credit check in the sales order level, which can be implemented using credit management in sales order level . In that case system will automatically block the sales order if the credit limit is exceeded.
So you do not need a DELIVERY BLOCK reason assigned to your SALES ORDER TYPE in VOV8.
Please clarify, whether you need to block the sales order and delivery due to credit limit...
or is it just sales order which need to be blocked ?
you can get the detailed configuration steps in SDN or the same is as follows.
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/SDBFCM/SDBFCM.pdf
Thanks & Regards,
Hegal K Charles

Disable Availability Check Based on Sales Order Type

Hi All SD experts,
Usually ( correct me if i'm wrong ) availability check is set via schedule lines item type. Is there any way that I can disable the availability check based solely on Sales Order Type ? Meaning no matter what item category or schedule lines assigned to materials, availability check will still be disable.
Besides setting in schedule lines type, what are others config that might trigger availability check ? MRP settings ? Movement type ?
Any valuable feedback will be great and much appreciated. A big thank you in advance.
Warmest Regards,
Edie

HI EDIE
    In order for the availability check to happen,the following configuration settings are required.
Availability check:
     a) you have to define requirement class & requirement type.
     b) you have to activate at scheduline category level
     c) in deleviry item.cat ,there is availability check off field,,,,, if u dont mention any values here,then system checks for availability.if u mention 'x' here,then system dont check for availability.
    d) you define checking group and checking rule ,these determine how availability check is going to be performed
MRP:
   MRP determines how material is planned,whether it is inhouse production or external procurement.MRP also determines the time taken for the material to become available for ready use.When ever an order is rised,the requirement is passed to MRP through transfer of requirements(TOR), here MRP determines the inhouse production time or external procurement time.
Movement Type: Movement type determines the type of material movement ,whether it is Goods Issue ,,, or ,, Goods Recipt,,,,, stock transfer between two plants etc.Movement type is determined in schedule line category level.
                  Award points if it is useful
                    Prasad.G

Free Good determination and reference status in sales order

Hi, I have a problem with the status of a position in a sales order.
The position is TANN (free good determination), it works good, the order was fully delivered and invoiced. But the reference status in the TANN position order is showing as "not referenced", so the order is still with status "Being processed".
I forgot some customizing in free good determination?
Thanks in advance!

Hi Fraga,
Have u done the Determine Item Category For Free Goods Item
In this u need to maintain the free goods item categories to the Sales Doc types.
Path: spro/sales & distribution/basic functions/free goods/Determine Item Category For Free Goods Item
Please check if it is helps.
regards,
Pritam

Determination of First Date in Sales Order

Hello SAP Friends,
Below is the issue we realised during the testing. The issue is with First date in the Sales Order which is not updated as per Unloading Point Calendar .
As per details I received, it should refer Unloading Point Calendar for ShiptoParty and populate the next working day as First date into Sales Order.
How is First Date determined in the sales order? Is there any config settings which is based on Route to do this? Or Is it controlled purely based on settings done in Tcode: VOV8, Leadtime days? I do not think VOV8 settings is controlling that in our APO system.
I have checked MAD, Pick/Pack, GI date all are populated correctly, But First Date did not follow the logic Unloading Point Calendar of ShiptoParty.
Please let know your inputs in this regard.
Thank you
Satish Waghmare

Satish,
I unfortunately don't have a solution for you. However, here are a few observations, and a question.
My experience is that 'First Date' in R/3 is not determined. In every sales order I have ever seen, First Date is proposed (matches the requested delivery date in the Sales order header) by the system, but can be overridden by any changes that the user may elect to make.
Generally, then, after First Date is entered, the R/3 system then may be configured to determine certain master data: Shipping Point, Unloading Point, Route, Route Schedule. From this master data, if you are performing ATP in R/3, the system will then also calculate various dates (if configured) for the confirmed schedule proposal: Normally these calculated dates are Delivery Date, Goods Issue Date, Loading Date, Material Availability date, Transportation Planning Date. If you have configured Route Schedules in R/3, other dates may be determined.
If you are performing ATP in APO, then any such scheduling must be performed in APO. Relevant Master data that was determined in R/3 is carried across to APO during the ATP check and is then used to calculate appropriate durations. This does not happen automatically, you have to configure the scheduling technique you wish to use in APO.
So, my first question: Are you performing ATP in APO? If not, then you should probably close this post, and re-enter in one of the SD forums, since it is an SD issue. If you are performing ATP in APO, then what scheduling technique are you using?
Best regards,
DB49

No-determination of Contract account in sales order

Hi All,
I have created a Business Partner and created a contract account for the same, but while creating sales order for the same BP, system is asking for contract account, and not allowing me to enter the same in line item,
giving an error message and exit from the screen.
help will be appriciated,
thanks in advance,
Kapoor N

Hi Dewang,
I have Copied the message pls check,
I have assigned 3 Conract accounts to this business partner but system shows me a warning message, "no contract account found" when i goto item--> Billing Document tab at that time system gives me the below mentioned error.
thanks for your help in advance,
Kapoor
Contract does not exist
Message no. E9011
Diagnosis
You have specified a record that does not exist in the database.
System Response
If you created the specified record in a previous workstep, the update process is not yet completed. Or, the process may have been canceled.
Procedure
In the case of an update process still being carried out, wait until the update of the desired record is completed.
In the case of a canceled update process, determine the reason for termination.
It is also possible that you have entered data incorrectly. Check your entry.

Determination of checking Rule in sales order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for