ATP: check rule AE in place of A when creating sales document

Hello,
when creating a sales order in the sand box, the ATP check rule was "A".
when creating a sales oorder in the development box, the ATP check rule is AE.
The product, the order type, the ATP configuration are completely similar.
I red on the forum that the check rule is determined by the system without any customizing reason.
But in this case, there must be a reason explaining why the system wants us to make assembly order as we do not use PP.
So do you have any idea how this check rule is determined?
Thank you,
Yann

Man I've been trying to figure this out all day. Luckily for you there is a person here who knows more than I do and he was gracious enough to answer my questions. The long & short of it is there is no assignment you can configure or change, the Check Rule is an internal assignment (hard coded) based on the MRP and requirements settings of the material. If you are getting AE then you are using a make-to-order material. Try a different material... one that is not replenishment, consignment or make to order. If you're getting a different rule in 2 different systems with the same materials please share the MM settings of each and we can explore the differences.
This is about as deep as you can get into ATP. Good stuff!

Similar Messages

ATP Checking Rule - stock transport sch. agmnt

Hi friends,
i created a New checking rule (ZB) in /NOMGP - stock transfer sch. agmnt. for inter company stock transfer. i attached it with a checking group(Z0) and made scope of check. And assigned with doc type LU, supplying plant, delivery type NLCC & checking rule (ZB). the Z0 checking group is assigned in mat master in sales org/plant view.
After creating delivery (VL10*) , in dlv i am getting Checking rule as "B". so i am not getting the ATP checks as per Z0-ZB setting. (checking group is coming correctly from mat master).
Can I get the checking rule ZB ??? in Delivery (environment -->availability )
thanks in advance
maity

Hi,
just maintain the same cheking group in mrp3 view of materailmaster also
and then try
hope it helps
reward if useful
rohit

ATP - Checking Rule

Hi friends,
i created a New checking rule (ZB) in /NOMGP - stock transfer sch. agmnt. for inter company stock transfer. i attached it with a checking group(Z0) and made scope of check. And assigned with doc type LU, supplying plant, delivery type NLCC & checking rule (ZB). the Z0 checking group is assigned in mat master in sales org/plant view.
After creating delivery (VL10*) , in dlv i am getting Checking rule as "B". so i am not getting the ATP checks as per Z0-ZB setting. (checking group is coming correctly from mat master).
Can I get the checking rule ZB ??? in Delivery (environment -->availability )

Hi,
just maintain the same cheking group in mrp3 view of materailmaster also
and then try
hope it helps
reward if useful
rohit

GATP: Unable to check ATP (in GATP) when creating sales order in R/3

Issue:
When doing ATP check (sales order) in R/3, I am able to see only availability screen of R/3 and not APO ATP screen. In other words ATP check is performed in R/3 and not in APO (GATP).
Simulation ATP check in APO works fine.
Environment: ATP is enabled in APO, Relevant ATP categories, ATP groups and master data transferred from R/3 to APO. CIF models to transfer SO data and other master data set up.
Appreciate your inputs.

Hi Madhu,
There can be multiple reasons why it does not go to APO.
Two of the most common overlooked points are:
1. ATP tick in integration model.
2. Activation of ATP in external system: this is done in SPRO in the data transfer section.
Another common point is cheking rule: In SPRO see that your business event(SO) is enabled for ATP check.
Also you can go to transaction CO09 for ATP simulation in R/3 .
Hope it helps. Otherwise you can revert with specific questions.
Regards
Santanu Dawn

ATP check active when creating sales order - want to deactivate

Hello experts,
at the time we created a sales order, the checking group for availability check in the master data of an article was "02" (Individual requirements). However, this was a master data error, as the correct setting for this article is "KP" (No check). We have changed this setting in the article master, but now we have a problem with the delivery, as we can not confirm the required quantity in the desired date. The ATP check says we have no availability (based on the wrong master data existing during the creation of the order), but we need to override this check.
Is ther any way of "overriding" the ATP check of the article in our sales order, thus taking into account the "KP" (no check) setting?
Thank you very much in advance.
Kind regards.
Marcos

Have you actually created the delivery yet? If not, you can use the following path to deactivate the ATP check during delivery:
> SPRO
> Logistics Execution
    > Availability Check & Transfer of Requirements
      > Availability Check
        > Determine procedure for Each Delivery Item Category
Perhaps turning of the ATP check temporarily shall help overcome the issue.

How can I place my initials when in a document shared review?

When in a document shared review envitronemnt, the Sign Document menu is grayed out, I want to be able to place my initials in
a document, what are my options?

The contents of the folder-level JavaScript file can simply be:
// Create and set the value of the identity.initials property
identity.initials = "GWJ";
You can then retrieve the value in your dynamic stamp JavaScript to the the value of a field, something like:
// Code in calculation of a text field in a dynamic stamp
event.value = identity.initials;

Do not set check on credit limit and risk exposure when creating returns

Currently, the system checks on credit limit regardless whether it is a sales order or a return. Now, my User want the system NOT to check if it is a sales return.
Where can I turned off this checks?
Please advice
Thanks

In t.code VOV8, for the return sales document type, keep the value blank for the field Check credit limit.
Also in t.code OVA7, for return item category, remove the check mark on the field credit active.
Regards

ATP checking rule for PM order

Hi friends,
How do I check which ATP rule is being used for Plant maintainence order (PM) order. Using Tcode IW41 we create PM order and do the goods movement type 261.
Error: I have an item ABC with quantity 1 and there exists a deliver for this 1 unit. Still, I am able to issue this part to PM order which should not happen.
Please advise .
Sruthi

SPRO->PM and CS->Maintenance and service processing->Maintenance and service orders->Functions and settings for order type->Availabilty check for material, PRTs and capacity

Authorization check when creating shipment document

Dear Experts,
I have a shipment document type that is shared for all shipping point. I found that there are no shipping point checking when we select outbound deliveries. Can we add shipping point authorization check when we select delivery document?
Please advice.
Thanks.

If you want to use frameworks, I think the right model would be to place the methods in EJBs and then use security constraints and user roles and the like.
OTOH, Spring probably has something very similar without requiring EJBs. It will require the beans come from the Spring container however and not the JSF managed bean container.

I use Place Multiple Fields when creating fillable forms. Is there a way calculations can be updated?

I would love to not have to go into every calculating field to re-set each calculation to the updated field names (there are 250 calculating fields). Any tips?

Thank you, GKaiseril! The field names are in sequence but I already know my javascript skills are not up to this challenge. Perhaps I should explain what I'm trying to accomplish and include some field names in the javascript forum?

I use Place Multiple Fields when creating fillable forms.

Is there a way calculations can be updated? I would love to not have to go into every calculating field to re-set each calculation to the updated field names (there are 250 calculating fields). Any tips?

(This is more of a question for the Acrobat Forms or Acrobat JavaScript forum...)
It's possible, but you need to use a custom calculation script that takes the target field name and extrapolates the names of the other fields from it, and then uses their values in the calculation.

Config to select Checking Rule "A" during Sales order availability check

Hi All,
Please can you tell me the config that tells system to select the checking rule "A" during sales order availability check. The problem at my client side is that the system was using the checking rule "A" initially but suddenly it has started using checking rule "B" (delivery) for sales order. The item category being used in YAN and Scheduline Line category is YC (ATP and Allocation allowed).
The checking group is getting picked up correctly from the Material Master value.
I have tried to find all the possible config that might be causing this issue, but I am unable to find one. Based on my understanding of the SAP SD process, there is no place where we can define in system to use the "checking rule" for SD availability check. This is the default (hard-coded) in the system.
Please can you help me to find how the checking rule "B" might be getting called instead of "A".
Regards,
Swapnil

Hi
Checking rule is transaction based like A for SD sales order and B for SD delivery like that it is defined
So in a sales order the system checks with the combination of AChecking rule and the Checking group defined in MMR and for that combination we give controls in OVZ9 and based on that system makes availability check
Every one and all SAP materials including myself say Checking Rule is transaction based and picked up by the system thro hard coded controls
But In t code OPJL it is possible to define new checking rules that means customization is possible
But where is the link or assignment
For this nobody has given correct answers including the PP friends
For you the system is shifting the Checking Rule from A to B in the sales order itself means we can find out get where the said assignment is done
In OVZ9 remove the combination Checking rule B and your Checking group and save
You said the system has shifted its Checking rule to B from A
Now test it after removing this control in OVZ9 and see the system is shifting once again to A or throwing error as the control is removed in OVZ9
make sure that you do this in a sales order and post back
Regards
Raja

ATP check for inbound EDI order

Hi Friends,
When I am creating outbound sales order then ATP check is getting executed properly & multiple schedule lines are getting creating in IDOC also (depending on the avaibility of stock).
But When I am trying to create the inbound sales order via EDI/IDOC there is no ATP check performed & multiple schedule lines are not getting created in sales order(as per the avaibility of stock which I am checkin thro So09 tcode).
ANy1 has faced smilier problem in past. If yes then please let me know how to solve this problem of ATP check.
PLease let me know as soon as possible.
Many thanks in advance
Br, Prashant

HI Frndz,
problem is solved by using following customizing settings
Customizing:
SD/function/requirement availability/availability check/default (OVZJ)
Change the field "Rule availability" to the required value. You receive a list of the possible values using the possible entries pushbutton. Rescheduling is regarded as background processing. If you want to allow partial deliveries, choose the value 'E'.

ATP Check: R/3 and APO

Hi All,
My Query related to an Earlier Post (GATP: Unable to check ATP (in GATP) when creating sales order in R/3).
I would like to change the settings for ATP Check from APO system to R/3, I.E, the ATP Check for Business Rule should be triggered in R/3 and not in APO.
In the earlier post, inputs were provided for the following:
- Activation of ATP in external system: this is done in SPRO in the data transfer section.
- Another common point is cheking rule: In SPRO see that your business event(SO) is enabled for ATP check.
As per my information, the 'ATP Check' tick is possible at the level of Checking Group and Schedule Line Category in R/3
Could someone please provide inputs as to where in SPRO can we check the above 2 points mentioned?
regards,
Sudhir

Hi Sudhir,
The following are the points where changes are required for ATP check in APO.
The presumption is that there already is a active CIF connection.
1) MRP type of the material has to be 'XO'
2) Define an integration model for ATP checks of those materials.
3) Define Checking Group. SPRO -> S&D -> Basic Functions -> Availability Check -> Availability check with ATP logic.(Here you define 02 - individual requirement)
4) Define Check Control: the path is same. (Note that the combination of 02 & A is added)
5) Define Requirement Class: the path is same. Here you put the availability check tick. Use 050 & check availability check & transfer of requirement for them.
6) Next you define procedure for the schedule lines.( hope this is what you were looking for.
7) Go to SPRO -> integration with other SAP components -> APO -> Basic settings for data transfer -> Change Transfer -> Change Transfer for master data -> Activate change pointers Generally and tick it.
You are now ready to for ATP of SOs from R/3 in APO.
All setteings required in APO for GATP is clearly mentioned in APO help docs.
Sure it will work for you.
All the best
Regards
Santanu Dawn

Block the ATP Stock for non-ATP checked items in BOP

Hello GATP Experts,
We have a strange and interesting scenario here with STOs. Let me explain step by step
1) We don't do ATP check for STOs and hence a Z-check mode has been designed and it will be considered for STO documents
2) Now, let us consider a situation where I have a stock of 100 CS for Material M1 at Plant P1.
3) Let's say, a STO document gets created at 09:00AM in the morning with requested quantity 50 and as it doesn't do ATP check this will be fully confirmed
and consumes 50CS of the stock.
4) So, the net cumulative quantity that is available is 50CS.
5) At 11:00AM,let us say; there is a sales order that was created for a quantity of 100 CS. As the sales document does the ATP check it consumes the only available 50 CS and gets saved with partial confirmaiton situation.
Now, at 12:00 PM - We are running the BOP. When we run the BOP ; what standard SAP does is STO document (as per our business scenario, STOs has higheest priority and they fall on top of the list) gets skipped due to non-ATP check mode and full stock is allocated to the sales order which makes no sense to us which leads to over confirmation situation.
We thought of exluding the STOs from BOP ; however - we end up in not re-scheduling the STO documents which would result in requiring a separate BOP to be run for the STO documents.
FYI - We have contacted SAP and they have confirmed that the above mentioned behavior of the BOP is as designed and it cannot be changed.
Is there any alternative solution for this ? Appreciate your valuable ideas.
Thanks
Babu Kilari

You might have already considered this. pardon if this sounds dumb.
see if you can pass STO's as a receipt in the scope of check for STO's. I presume it is requirement element in your case for ATP checking rule for STO's. Don't include these STO's in sales order checking rules.
This may result in inconsistent ATP logic though. Alternately try creating a Z category for STO and call it a receipt. include this also in the scope of check for STO's.
Try running BOP and see what happens. BOP on its own is not a gurantee that a requirement is always confirmed over another, whatever be the sorting criteria. If there isnt enough stuff, the system has its own internal logic of sorting too which probably treats priority by time of creation of the requirement.
Publish if you meet any success. These ideas are just based on my fancies
Guru

ATP: check rule AE in place of A when creating sales document

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for