Consistent Gets statistic

I would like to get a better understanding of what exactly this statistic means. Oracle documentation states:
Consistent Gets is the number of times a consistent read was requested for a block.
Is the data included in Consistent Gets coming from a Rollback Segment of from a DB Cache?
In the datawarehousing environment with very heavy reporting and ETL running at the same time, when Consistent Gets statistic is 5 times higher than Physical Reads, is that a reason for concern?

In the datawarehousing environment with very heavy reporting and ETL running at the same time, when Consistent Gets statistic is 5 times higher than Physical Reads, is that a reason for concern? <<It doesn't sound relevant -- if your reporting is using parallel query then it is bypassing the buffer cache, hence a logical i/o against the table being parallel-scanned is going to be a physical i/o also. So, much would depend on how much use you are making of parallel query.
The parallel query LIO/PIO effect is easy to demonstrate by querying a chunk of data twice with a noparallel hint and twice with a parallel hint, and having autotrace turned on. you'll see the PIO's drop down on the second execution of the noparallel query, but on the parallel query they'll remain pretty much the same on the second execution.

Similar Messages

No physical reads, plenty of consistant gets

Hi All,
Oracle v11.2 on Linux.
Please have a look at the query I ran and the output. The SQL_ID is of a SELECT command.
What does this situation represents, where there are zero physical reads and plenty of consistant gets ?
For consistant gets, we do read undo information (correct ??), if that undo is read from disk, will that be a "physical read"? i.e. if we read disks for consistant gets, will that be counted under physical reads or not ?
How can I describe the exact data retrival of the command here? Is it the case of "everything it needs is found in the buffer cache" ?
select a.sid, a.value , B.NAME , s.sql_id
from v$sesstat a, v$statname b, v$session s
where A.STATISTIC# = B.STATISTIC#
and b.name in ( 'redo size','physical read bytes','physical reads cache','consistent gets' )
and a.sid = s.sid
and a.sid=1018
order by a.sid;
       SID      VALUE NAME                                                             SQL_ID
      1018    7281396 consistent gets                                                  434u36htuz0s9
      1018          0 physical reads cache                                             434u36htuz0s9
      1018          0 physical read bytes                                              434u36htuz0s9
      1018       4448 redo size                                                        434u36htuz0s9
4 rows selected.Thanks in advance.

>
There are no physical reads, so weather its doing consistant-gets or not, can I say, all data required for the SELECT was in buffer cache ?
>
The data for those system views is cached in memory so Oracle does not read the disk (except at startup) to gather the information.
Some static information, like dictionary objects, is stored stored on disk in the system tablespace but this data is read when the database is mounted and stored in memory structures.
Other dynamic information, like session info, is only stored in memory structures (similar to C arrays) and Oracle can query these as if they were tables.
So no, the data was not in the buffer cache. It was already in system memory.

What's "consistent gets - examination"?

http://www.dba-oracle.com/m_consistent_gets.htm
says it is a special consistent gets which only need one latch instead of 2 latches(for normal consistent gets). Could you anyone put more information on this? Under what condition which this stats happens? such as access the root block of the index?

user646745,
Thanks for supplying your test case to demonstrate your point.
My original comment was:
Blocks from a suitably defined single table hash cluster make another case because (if there have been no hash collisions) the location of the correct row-pointer is implied by the hash-key value requested.
You also need a unique index on the hash key (which won't be used for the access, even though it exists) and have to query with equality on the hash key.
I modified your test case to demonstrate this - running on 9.2.0.8:
SQL> set echo on
SQL> @temp
SQL> drop table t_hashed;
Table dropped.
SQL> drop cluster hash_cluster;
Cluster dropped.
SQL>
SQL> create cluster hash_cluster
2 ( hash_key number(10) )
3 hashkeys 100
4 size 60
5 single table
6 hash is HASH_KEY;
Cluster created.
SQL>
SQL> create table t_hashed
2 cluster hash_cluster(a)
3 as
4 select cast( rownum as number(10) ) a from all_objects where rownum <= 100;
Table created.
SQL>
SQL> create unique index t_pk on t_hashed(a);
Index created.
SQL> alter table t_hashed add constraint t_pk primary key (a);
Table altered.
SQL>
SQL> execute dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats('test_user', cascade=>true);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> select name,value from v$mystat a , v$statname b where a.STATISTIC#=b.STATISTIC# and b.NAME like 'consistent%';
NAME VALUE
consistent gets 7393
consistent changes 24
consistent gets - examination 611
3 rows selected.
SQL>
SQL> declare
2 a int;
3 begin
4 for i in 1 .. 10000 loop
5 select a into a from t_hashed where a = 1 + mod(i,100);
6 end loop;
7 end;
8 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> select name,value from v$mystat a , v$statname b where a.STATISTIC#=b.STATISTIC# and b.NAME like 'consistent%';
NAME VALUE
consistent gets 17417
consistent changes 24
consistent gets - examination 10620
3 rows selected.
SQL>
SQL>
SQL> ed temp.lst
SQL> spool offThe "examination" seems to be about doing a minimal amount of work while holding the latch - so reading every row from the block doesn't count.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance,
it is the illusion of knowledge." Stephen Hawking.

I'm having problems with 8.1 and Continuity / Handoff. It will work fine for web pages, etc. but in email when I try to do it between by iPhone 5s running 8.1 and my Macbook Pro running Yosemite I consistently get an error.

I'm having problems with 8.1 and Continuity / Handoff. It will work fine for web pages, etc. but in email when I try to do it between by iPhone 5s running 8.1 and my Macbook Pro running Yosemite I consistently get an error. "Failed to Continue Activity" Cocoa Error 4609. Handoff is working for phone calls and text messages. By email just crashes each time. It was also doing it under 8.0.2. My iPhone and iPad handle this fine. It's only the MacBook to the iPhone that fails, and only on email.

Handoff Continuity Troubleshooting

I consistently get this messsage and have to restart the system - "Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system". When I look at the Task Manager no Fire

I consistently get this message and have to re'boot my system. "Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system"
== User Agent ==
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6.5; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; InfoPath.2; Media Center PC 5.0; SLCC1)

'''Kill Application'''
In Task Manager, does firefox.exe show in the '''Processes''' tab?
See: [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Kill_application Kill Application]
'''Causes and solutions for Firefox hanging at exit:'''
[[Firefox hangs]]
[http://kb.mozillazine.org/Firefox_hangs#Hang_at_exit Firefox hangs at exit]
[[Firefox is already running but is not responding]]
'''Safe Mode'''
You may need to use '''[[Safe Mode]]''' (click on "Safe Mode" and read) to localize the problem. Firefox Safe Mode is a diagnostic mode that disables Extensions and some other features of Firefox. If you are using a theme, switch to the DEFAULT theme: Tools > Add-ons > Themes '''before''' starting Safe Mode. When entering Safe Mode, do not check any items on the entry window, just click "Continue in Safe Mode". Test to see if the problem you are experiencing is corrected.
See:
'''[[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]]'''
'''[[Troubleshooting plugins]]'''
'''[[Basic Troubleshooting]]'''
If the problem does not occur in Safe-mode then disable all of your Extensions and Plug-ins and then try to find which is causing it by enabling '''one at a time''' until the problem reappears. '''You MUST close and restart Firefox after EACH change''' via File > Restart Firefox (on Mac: Firefox > Quit). You can use "Disable all add-ons" on the Safe mode start window.

Consistent gets and physical reads

Hi all,
I am tuning a DM SQL query, by comparing execution plans with STAR TRANSFORMATION enabled or disabled. I got the following results:
STAR TRANSFORMATION ON
74889 consistent gets
254365 physical reads
STAR TRANSFORMATION OFF
1945892 consistent gets
168028 physical reads
I thought a physical read would be counted as a logical read as well, because the data block would be read from disk (1 physical IO), placed in the buffer cache and then read from there (1 more logical IO or consistent get).
So, one physical IO does not cause a logical IO?
Thanks!
Edited by: user10634835 on 12-Jul-2011 08:40

But shouldn't consistent gets be >= physical reads (Since, as per my understanding, 1 PIO causes at least 1 LIO)? In this case it is not.
74889 consistent gets
254365 physical readsJust clarifying for my knowledge.
regards

Consistently getting an error in custom reports "an error occurred" is the only msg displayed...my c

Consistently getting an error in custom reports "an error occurred" is the only msg displayed...my clients are screaming...what is the problem?

Hi,
Please log a ticket with BC support for this issue. Please provide the exact steps, preferably a video. You can log the ticket from your admin panel > help & support.
Kind Regards,
Aish

Consistently getting invalid URL error

I'm consistently getting following with Safari 6.02. The URLs I'm trying to go to are such uncommon web sites as facebook.com and ebay.com. Seems once Safari sets it's mind to it there is no way around this "error"? I've tried clearing history, closing/reopening safari...still no worky.
The requested URL "/", is invalid.
Reference #9.ac6d19b8.1359073068.1022326c

you must install a peer id registration/lookup service compatible with VideoPhoneLabs' queries onto your web server. a sample service is the "reg.cgi" python script included with VideoPhoneLabs. you must create the database it'll use according to the schema in the script comment and place the database (and the script) in your filesystem with appropriate permissions for your OS and web server. then you give the URL to that web service as the WebServiceUrl constant.

Trying to understand consistent gets

1. We were very surprised to observe that the consistent gets for a query (shown below) changed (from 120K to 18K) when the only modification was adding a comment to it. How can this happen?
2. Furthermore, the plans for the two queries were identical. How can consistent gets differ if the plan is the same?
3. Is consistent gets the best metric for comparing the performance of two versions of a query, or is there a better one? (In the past we've tried to use execution timing for comparison, but the timing of a single query can vary greatly between runs.)
select
 count(*) from (
SELECT source_id, project_id,
 max_score,
 fields_matched
FROM (SELECT source_id, project_id, MAX(scoring) as max_score,
 apidb.tab_to_string(set(CAST(COLLECT(table_name) AS apidb.varchartab)), ', ') fields_matched,
 max(index_name) keep (dense_rank first order by scoring desc, source_id, table_name) as index_name,
 max(oracle_rowid) keep (dense_rank first order by scoring desc, source_id, table_name) as oracle_rowid
 FROM ( SELECT SCORE(1) * (select nvl(max(weight), 1) from apidb.TableWeight where table_name = 'Blastp')
 as scoring,
 'apidb.blastp_text_ix' as index_name, b.rowid as oracle_rowid, b.source_id, b.project_id,
 external_database_name as table_name
 FROM apidb.Blastp b
 WHERE CONTAINS(b.description, 'protein', 1) > 0
 AND 'Blastp' IN ('Product', 'Notes', 'Comments', 'InterPro', 'EcNumber', 'GoTerms', 'Phenotype', 'Notes', 'and the rest')
 AND 'gene' = 'gene'
 AND b.pvalue_exp < -30
 AND b.query_organism IN ('Plasmodium falciparum', 'Plasmodium vivax', 'Plasmodium yoelii', 'Plasmodium berghei', 'Plasmodium chabaudi', 'Plasmodium knowlesi')
 UNION
 SELECT
 SCORE(1)* nvl(tw.weight, 1)
 as scoring,
 'apidb.gene_text_ix' as index_name, gt.rowid as oracle_rowid, gt.source_id, gt.project_id, gt.field_name as table_name
 FROM apidb.GeneDetail gt, apidb.TableWeight tw, apidb.GeneAttributes ga
 WHERE CONTAINS(content, 'protein', 1) > 0
 AND gt.field_name IN ('Product', 'Notes', 'Comments', 'InterPro', 'EcNumber', 'GoTerms', 'Phenotype')
 AND 'gene' = 'gene'
 AND gt.field_name = tw.table_name(+)
 AND gt.source_id = ga.source_id
 AND ga.species IN ('Plasmodium falciparum', 'Plasmodium vivax', 'Plasmodium yoelii', 'Plasmodium berghei', 'Plasmodium chabaudi', 'Plasmodium knowlesi')
 UNION
 SELECT SCORE(1) * nvl(tw.weight, 1)
 as scoring,
 'apidb.isolate_text_ix' as index_name, wit.rowid as oracle_rowid, wit.source_id, wit.project_id, wit.field_name as table_name
 FROM apidb.IsolateDetail wit, apidb.TableWeight tw
 WHERE CONTAINS(content, 'protein', 1) > 0
 AND wit.field_name in ('fred')
 AND 'gene' = 'isolate'
 AND wit.field_name = tw.table_name(+)
 GROUP BY source_id, project_id
 ORDER BY max_score desc, source_id
);

1. We were very surprised to observe that the consistent gets for a query (shown below) changed (from 120K to 18K) when the only modification was adding a comment to it. How can this happen?Adding a comment and getting a different anything makes no sense, but you already know this. Did you toggle the comment on and off to see any changes in performance?
2. Furthermore, the plans for the two queries were identical. How can consistent gets differ if the plan is the same?Clearly something odd happened. Possibilities include
* wrong execution plan reported in one case (unlikely, but possible)
* system resource availability was different at different times
3. Is consistent gets the best metric for comparing the performance of two versions of a queryI use consistent gets, but also look at disk reads (not useful after data has been cached), CPU, and overall execution time. On rare occasions queries can be CPU-bound
Edited by: riedelme on Mar 3, 2010 1:06 PM

When I download photos from my PC to my iPad I can't consistently get them to appear in order. Any suggestions

When I download photos from my PC to my iPad I cannot consistently get them to appear in the order I want them even after changing their file names and arranging them in the order I want. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated

Maybe this will help you; http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4221
Best way is to use another App, something like Photo Manager Pro which is an excelent app. You can do everything you can't with Apple's sofware: order pictures in the order you want, any order; copy, paste, transfer... you name it, it does it.

Consistent gets are reduced by 50% but the query taking more elapsed time.

Hi All,
While tuning a application my consistent gets are reduced by 50% but the query is still taking the same time.
In a Warehouse env data is coming from With clause that is having some 40000 rows .Then these 40K rows are joined to a table that is having 2 Billion records having indexes on primary key and date column(bitmap)indexes .
It is using Hash Joining method.

Try forcing a hash join, if possible:
http://dba-oracle.com/tips_oracle_hash_joins.htm
Can you post the plans?
http://www.dba-oracle.com/plsql/t_plsql_plans.htm

Query 1 shows less consistent gets but more cost than Query 2..

Hi ,
SQL> select dname from scott.dept where deptno not in (select deptno from scott.emp)
Ðñüãñáììá åêôÝëåóçò
Plan hash value: 3547749009
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 22 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| DEPT | 4 | 88 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 11 | 143 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
 1 - filter( NOT EXISTS (SELECT /*+ */ 0 FROM "SCOTT"."EMP" "EMP"
 WHERE LNNVL("DEPTNO"<>:B1)))
 3 - filter(LNNVL("DEPTNO"<>:B1))
Note
 - dynamic sampling used for this statement
ÓôáôéóôéêÜ
 0 recursive calls
 0 db block gets
 15 consistent gets
 0 physical reads
 0 redo size
 416 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
 384 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
 0 sorts (memory)
 0 sorts (disk)
 1 rows processed
SQL>
SQL> select dname from scott.dept,scott.emp where dept.deptno=emp.deptno(+)
2 and emp.rowid is null;
Ðñüãñáììá åêôÝëåóçò
Plan hash value: 2146709594
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 12 | 564 | 5 (20)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 12 | 564 | 5 (20)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| DEPT | 4 | 88 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP | 12 | 300 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
 1 - filter("EMP".ROWID IS NULL)
 2 - access("DEPT"."DEPTNO"="EMP"."DEPTNO"(+))
Note
 - dynamic sampling used for this statement
ÓôáôéóôéêÜ
 0 recursive calls
 0 db block gets
 6 consistent gets
 0 physical reads
 0 redo size
 416 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
 384 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
 0 sorts (memory)
 0 sorts (disk)
 1 rows processedI have two questions:
1) which one is preferable.... the first which is less costy to the system or the second which causes less consistent gets to the system and so is considered to be more scalable..????
2)Whereas the number of rows returned by both queries is 1.. why the is difference in the underlined values in the two queries (values 1 and 12 respectively)?
I use Oracle10g v.2
Thanks.. a lot
Sim

The less logical I/O's the better.
So always do it like your query 2 (btw. your title is the wrong way)
Your example is probably flawed. If I try it in SQL*Plus I get correct results:
SQL> get t
1* select dname from dept where deptno not in (select deptno from emp)
SQL> /
Execution Plan
 0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=6 Card=3 Bytes=39)
 1 0 FILTER
 2 1 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'DEPT' (TABLE) (Cost=2 Card=4 Bytes=52)
 3 1 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP' (TABLE) (Cost=2 Card=1 Bytes=3)
Statistics
 0 recursive calls
 0 db block gets
 15 consistent gets
 0 physical reads
 0 redo size
 537 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
 660 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
 0 sorts (memory)
 0 sorts (disk)
 1 rows processed
SQL> get tt
1 select dname from dept,emp where dept.deptno=emp.deptno(+)
2* and emp.rowid is null
SQL> /
Execution Plan
 0 SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=5 Card=14 Bytes=322)
 1 0 FILTER
 2 1 HASH JOIN (OUTER) (Cost=5 Card=14 Bytes=322)
 3 2 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'DEPT' (TABLE) (Cost=2 Card=4 Bytes=52)
 4 2 TABLE ACCESS (FULL) OF 'EMP' (TABLE) (Cost=2 Card=14 Bytes=140)
Statistics
 0 recursive calls
 0 db block gets
 6 consistent gets
 0 physical reads
 0 redo size
 537 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
 660 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
 2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
 0 sorts (memory)
 0 sorts (disk)
 1 rows processed
SQL> I'm wondering for instance why you have there 11 rows in emp for query 1 (should be only 1 row) and why you have only 12 rows in query 2 (should be 14 rows)

Consistent gets examination

" You have 3,847.1 consistent gets examination per second. "Consistent gets - examination" is different than regular consistent gets. It is used to read undo blocks for consistent read purposes, but also for the first part of an index read and hash cluster I/O. To reduce logical I/O, you may consider moving your indexes to a large blocksize tablespace. Because index splitting and spawning are controlled at the block level, a larger blocksize will result in a flatter index tree structure.
Can you explain the above and help me understand it?
What is index split and spawning? why does it happen and what is the fix?
Which indexes are affected? Is there a query to find out? What is an optimal block size to use for these affected index table spaces?

I'd strongly suggest you start reading the Oracle DBA manual to get a bit more basics behind you before you get into the advanced tuning stuff. It's at http://docs.oracle.com

Reduce Logical IO [db block gets/consistent gets]

Hi,
Still I'm unsure about the Logical IO (db block gets + consistent gets).
I want to reduce 'consistent gets' for this query
SQL> set autotrace traceonly
SQL> select * from cm_per_phone_vw;
905 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 524433310
| Id | Operation                    | Name         | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |              |   868 | 38192 |     8   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | SORT GROUP BY NOSORT        |              |   868 | 38192 |     8   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| CI_PER_PHONE | 1238 | 54472 |     8   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   3 |    INDEX FULL SCAN           | CM172C0      | 1238 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Statistics
          8 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
        922 consistent gets
          4 physical reads
          0 redo size
      39151 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
       1045 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
         62 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
        905 rows processedFollowing is the view it's accessing
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW CM_PER_PHONE_VW
AS
SELECT
per_id
, MAX(DECODE(TRIM(phone_type_cd), 'MOB', phone)) AS MOB
, MAX(DECODE(TRIM(phone_type_cd), 'HOME', phone)) AS HOME
, MAX(DECODE(TRIM(phone_type_cd), 'BUSN', TRIM(phone) || ' ' || TRIM(extension))) AS BUSN
, MAX(DECODE(TRIM(phone_type_cd), 'FAX', phone)) AS FAX
, MAX(DECODE(TRIM(phone_type_cd), 'INT', phone)) AS INT
FROM
ci_per_phone
GROUP BY
per_idI have following indexes on table ci_per_phone
INDEX_NAME                     COLUMN_NAME                    COLUMN_POSITION
XM172P0                        PER_ID                                       1
XM172P0                        SEQ_NUM                                      2
XM172S1                        PHONE                                        1
CM172C0                        PER_ID                                       1I tried creating indexes on PER_ID and PHONE_TYPE_CD but the consistent gets reduces to 920 instead of 922.
Just for curiosity, how can I reduce this?
secondly, is there any explanation on 'OPERATION' break of the plan, e.g. TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ?
Please advice.
Luckys.

Further I'm having problem with another query which is a view
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW CM_PER_CHAR_VW
AS
SELECT
/*+ full (a) */
a.acct_id
, MAX(DECODE(a.char_type_cd, 'ACCTYPE', a.char_val)) acct_type
, MAX(DECODE(a.char_type_cd, 'PRVBLCYC', a.adhoc_char_val)) prev_bill_cyc
FROM
ci_acct_char a
WHERE
a.effdt =
    (SELECT
      MAX(a1.effdt)
    FROM
      ci_acct_char a1
    WHERE a1.acct_id = a.acct_id
    AND a1.char_type_cd = a.char_type_cd)
GROUP BY
a.acct_idI'm not able to reduce the consistent gets and even the filter appears.
I've analyzed the table as well as the index on the table.
cisadm@CCBDEV> select * from cm_acct_char_vw;
2649 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 132362271
| Id | Operation              | Name         | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT       |              |    27 | 4536 |    14   (8)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | HASH GROUP BY         |              |    27 | 4536 |    14   (8)| 00:00:01 |
|   2 |   VIEW                 |              |    27 | 4536 |    14   (8)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |    FILTER              |              |       |       |            |          |
|   4 |     HASH GROUP BY      |              |    27 | 2916 |    14   (8)| 00:00:01 |
|   5 |      NESTED LOOPS      |              | 2686 |   283K|    13   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL| CI_ACCT_CHAR | 2686 |   157K|    12   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN | XM064P0      |     1 |    48 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - filter("A"."EFFDT"=MAX("A1"."EFFDT"))
   7 - access("A1"."ACCT_ID"="A"."ACCT_ID" AND
              "A1"."CHAR_TYPE_CD"="A"."CHAR_TYPE_CD")
Statistics
          0 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
       2754 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
      76517 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
       2321 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
        178 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
       2649 rows processedhere's the tkprof
select *
from
cm_acct_char_vw
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        2      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Fetch      178      0.07       0.05          0       2754          0        2649
total      181      0.07       0.05          0       2754          0        2649
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 63 (CISADM)
Rows     Execution Plan
      0 SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: CHOOSE
      0   HASH (GROUP BY)
      0    VIEW
      0     FILTER
      0      HASH (GROUP BY)
      0       NESTED LOOPS
      0        TABLE ACCESS   MODE: ANALYZED (FULL) OF 'CI_ACCT_CHAR'
                   (TABLE)
      0        INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'XM064P0'
                   (INDEX (UNIQUE))
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait Total Waited
----------------------------------------   Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client                     179        0.00          0.00
SQL*Net message from client                   179        0.00          0.08
********************************************************************************I've an similar query for another table, where there are 1110 rows, but in the explain, no filter appears in the predicate
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("P"."EFFDT"="VW_COL_1" AND "PER_ID"="P"."PER_ID" AND
              "CHAR_TYPE_CD"="P"."CHAR_TYPE_CD")Both the queries have somewhat similar views.
I've got 2 questions,
Is there a way I can reduce the consistent gets( I've tried with/without HINTS),
secondly whats the predicate access shows as 'VW_COL_1'
please advice.

HT1338 How do you consistently get the scroll bar on the right side of the page

How do you consistently get the scroll bar on the right side of the page.

Go into System Preferences, select General and set "Show scroll bars" to "Always".

Consistent Gets statistic

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for