Contra account :Acqusition Value

Hi Expert,
i have one doubt , while AO90 asset GL assignment where there is one filed i.e Contra account : Acquisition Value . :________ : what is use of this field which type of Business transaction for the same field to give GL Account .
kindly explain with accounting entry as well.
kindly help me.
Kind regards
Pranav

Here we have to provide off setting account i.e.GR/IR clearing or any interim account for asset acquisition or credit memo posting with out vendor posting. The scenario is similar to asset sale with out customer.
There is a situation where we want to post acquisition with out any vendor. That time system will default the above GL for the transaction.
For example if we want to post asset acquisition with out vendor, we use T.code AB01 and provide transaction type as '100' along with dates. After press enter system will default the above GL, which has maintained in contra account in the screen, in change mode. If you simulate the transaction, system will display the below entry:
Asset A/c Dr
GR/IR Clearing A/c
Similarly for credit memo i.e.ABGL with transaction type 105. Later we have to set off this GR/IR account with vendor.
Regards,
Mukthar

Similar Messages

Account 'contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found.

Hi Guru,
I am trying to transfer the Asset balance from one company code asset to another company code asset by using the T_code ABT1N but it is through the below error.
Account 'contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found.
Message no: AU 133
Diagnosis
When creating the accounting document, the system could not find a account'contra account: Acquisition value' for the company code ABC.
Procedure
Enter this account in the account determination for asset accounting.
Please give me the needful suggestion to resolve this error.
Thanks in Advance
Vasavi
Moderator: Maintain the accounts in AO90. Please, avoid asking basic questions

Hi,
what ever posting done in asset sub ledger is parally updated in financial accounting G/l. For updating we need to assign G/L accounts to subsidary ledger. so go AO90 and assing g/l account against contra accounts.
Thanks & Regards
Sunitha

Account 'Contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found in ASKB

Hi SAP experts
1. First we have created new asset with reference old assets in As01
2. After that we have transfer all asset from old to new asset with in the company code in the ABUMN T.code in the month on 01.04.2010
3. After that we have run the deprecation for April, May and Jun. Up to this, there were no problem those periods
(now here we are following first we are running the ASKB and after that we are running AFAB)
4. now we are facing the new issue for July month while running ASKB Like Below
Account 'Contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found for Deprecation area 52
Message no. AU133
Diagnosis: When creating the accounting document, the system could not find account
'Contra account: Acquisition value' for company code 0216.
System Response
Procedure: Enter this account in the account determination for Asset Accounting.
Here in Error log it showing three account determinations 100002,100010 and 100040
5.As per my knowledge we can maintain the G/L account for account determination in the T.code AO90 for deprecation area wise but why the new error massage has come into picture.
Please let me know if you require more information about the issue
Can you any body please give me suggestion based on the issue and
Thanks and Regards
sudharshana vamsi

Hi Sridevi
Thanks for your suggestions
if i will maintain G/L account for account determination in the T.code AO90 for deprecation area wise, is there any effects for another company codes and balance sheet wise
And also we are running depreciation since 2003, now suddenly it is coming into picture in the month of July. and may i know the reason. Are there any new patches are added in sap
And also if you donu2019t mind can you tell me what are purpose to maintain the Contra G/L account in the AO90.
Thanks and Regards
sudharshana vamsi

Error AU133 Account 'Contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found

I have this error when running RAPERB2000 program in IDES ECC6.0.
I have checked AO90 and this B/S account (199990) is maintain correctly in area 64 for the account determination.
This is the job log:-
02.12.2010 23:21:41 Errors occurred during the posting run (see the log)
02.12.2010 23:21:41 Company code AA01, depreciation area 64, fiscal year 2010, account group 30000
02.12.2010 23:21:41 Account 'Contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found for area 64
02.12.2010 23:21:41 Company code AA01, depreciation area 64, fiscal year 2010, account group 40000
02.12.2010 23:21:41 Account 'Contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found for area 64
02.12.2010 23:21:41 Company code AA01, depreciation area 64, fiscal year 2010, account group 30000
02.12.2010 23:21:41 Account 'Contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found for area 64
02.12.2010 23:21:41 Document INT-000026 was created successfully for Asset Accounting
02.12.2010 23:21:41 Company code AA01, depreciation area 99, fiscal year 2010, account group 20000
02.12.2010 23:21:41 Document INT-000027 was created successfully for Asset Accounting
02.12.2010 23:21:42 Errors occurred during the posting run (see the log)
Anyone has any idea why this error occur?

Hi,
Error AU133, is generally issued from some wrong or missing customizing. The text of the error message indicates in your case that a "Account 'Contra account'" and area 64 is concerned.
1) At first, please double check if in in AO90 (or table T095) the account is maintained for area 64. Do you have not defined a contra account for acquisition value postings in the Asset Accounting Customizing settings (Transaction AO90)?
Further, check in tr. OADB if you have defined "Different Depreciation Area XX". That means area 64 takes the account determination from area xx and perhaps there it is no account defined?
If this is not the reason:
2) Execute report RACKONT1 or transaction OAK4. Account determination should be set following the rules explained in SAP note 7595. Even if some account is not directly used, the account determination has to be completed. If output from RACKONT1 is not error free, it indicates that your customizing is wrong. You might correct it with the help of note 7595.
Furthermore:
3) You have defined the account in Asset Accounting, however, it is not created in the affected company code. Check whether the account is correct and create it for the company code, if necessary.
4) You have entered an asset reconciliation account for the "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" (for example, the same account as for the "Acquisition:Acquis. and production costs" account). This is not permitted.
5) As "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" you entered an asset G/L account. If necessary change the automatic posting indicator in the G/L account master record.
Regards Bernhard

Account 'Contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found for area 01

Hi, everyone!
I am practicing in T-code ABZON.
I created one asset and purchased it. When I use T-code ABZON to acquisition with automatic, I cannot post because it has error: Account 'Contra account: Acquisition value' could not be found for area 01.
How can I fix it? can you help me?
Thanks for advices.

Hi,
Please use T-Code AO90 which will open a screen asking you to enter Chart of Depreciation.
After entering the Chart of Depreciation (COD), select the COD and click on the Account Determination which will open up the list of Account Determination. Select the correct Account Determination for the asset for which you were getting the error and click on "Balance Sheet Accounts". You will get the Depreciation Areas. Click on Depreciation Area "01" which will display the "Contra account: Acquisition value". Give the correct G/L account to pass the Contra Entry.
regards,
Chintan Shah
Edited by: Chintan Shah on Jun 24, 2010 8:24 AM

What is the impact by changing gl account contra account: acquisition value

Hi experts
what is the impact by changing gl account (contra account: acquisition value in asset accounting(AO90) to the different company codes and different countries. Please review and send across step by step points to us
Warm regards
Sreenivas

hi,
thnaks for reply, but we cannot reverse as it is initially uploaded directly in asset reconciliation account, moreover, we are already in production and we are yet to run the depriciation from april, finanlly we decided to post the difference amount in reconciliation accounts with OASV, but till now opening upload account shows zero balance, once we post the difference amounts directly in reconciliation accounts this initial upload gl account shows the carryforward balance from march. is there any other alternative,

Calculating Acqusition value and Accumulated depriciation

Hi,
I want to create a new report which shows the acqusition value . accumulated depriciation and monthly derpricaition for an asset.
I have used funciton module 'DEPR_RECALCULATE' to find acuistion value and accumulated derp , but the acq value displayed is always equal to the acquistion value at the fiscal year start , irrerspective of the period entered .
ALso in my report if i enter period as 7 , then acq value for the asset in period 7 should be displayed . and accumulated depr upto period 6 should be displayed .ie acq for asset during the period entered and accum depr till period-1 should be displayed
Could some one help me with a proper way to calculate asset acq and accumulatd depr .
I tried looking into the std report RABEST01 , but it uses logical database ADA .And I would notbe able to use logical db , as the accum depr and acq value need to calculated for diff periods .
Thanks,
Lalitha Iyer

Hi,
Try report RAHAFA_ALV01.
After executing the above report, go to change layout option and choose below fields.
1) ***.acq.value
Acq value start of FY
2) Accum.dep.
Accum dep start of FY
3) Start book.val
NBV start of FY (1-2) minus
4) Trans.acq.val
Acq transactions from FY start to Report date (in selection screen)
5) Trns.AccDep
Accum dep from FY start to Report date (in selection screen), this field will have values only some transfer transactions posted to that particular asset
6) PlndDep
Planned dep from FY start to report date
7) End book val
End book value on report date (3+4-5-6)
You dont need to create a new report for this requirement.
Transaction codes for this report are the below
AR03
S_ALR_87012004
S_ALR_87012005
S_ALR_87012026
S_ALR_87012027
S_ALR_87012035
S_ALR_87012036
S_ALR_87012064
S_ALR_87012065
S_P6B_12000064
Thanks,
Srinu

Field Account Determination value in Posting Parameter tabpage

Hi RE-Gurus,
I have a specific requirement.
In a given RE-FX Lease Out Contract, we enter Account Determination Value on the Posting parameters tab page which is responsible for determination of the G/L account which shall be posted at the time of carrying out Periodic Posting.
The requirement is that i want to control the change authorization for the same for specific set of users.
This means if i have 10 users who have Contract change authorization, only one of them shall have authorization to change the Account Determination Value on the Posting parameters tab page and rest 9 users shall not be allowed to change the Account Determination Value.
I hope i m clear in stating my requirement.
Plz revert back ASAP.
Thanks,
Pankaj

Hi,
please have a look at SAP note 1005831 which provides BAdI BADI_RECA_AUTH_CHECK for implementing customer specific authorization checks for real estate objects. The BADI provides also an example implementation for your reference.
Regards,
Franz

FBL3N - Contra Account Display

Hi,
In FBL3N report, is it possible to get the display of the contra accounts that got posted to. I checked in the layout selection, it looked like there is not an option.
Is there any way to get this? Or, should I look at any other report.
Thanks for your help,
Ram

Ram,
Are the contra accounts you referring to for full accrual postings? The contra accounts that we created for our full accrual postings were not originally set up for Line Item Display. If I try to display one of our full accrual contra accounts using FBL3N, I receive a message stating that "no line item display possible". If I change the line item display option on the master data control tab for the account, I will only see the items being posted using FBL3N from that day the change is made going forward only (not any previous postings). However using report GD13, I can pull the actvity for the contra account from the special ledger (ZZ) and drill down to the actual documents.

HS.EXP does not take into account the Value member and the source

Hello,
The formula is put in the "Entity Curr Adjs" part of the Sub Calculate.
The expression is the following and apply for one entity (Holding method) I filtered previously and the ICP Entity has proportionnal method with 50% rate:
HS.Exp "A#5420.I#[ICP None].C1#REC.C2#[None].C3#[None].C4#Recla_IAS_Aut_RetS_5=
A#5340.V#[Contribution].E#Logista_E_TBCO.I#UTE_O.C1#CLO.C2#TotC2.C3#TotC3.C4#TotC4"
The data I would like to retrieve is the one in Contribution Value as I put on the source part of the expression.
And yet, the data I get is the one of the Entity Currency and Proportion Value, which is different because the ICP has proportionnal method (50%) and the Contribution value is the result of Proportion - Elimination values.
To sum up: I obtain a data of 50 instead of 25.
I checked that the data I see in my form corresponds to the source parameters but it seems that it does not take into account the Value parameter.
Could it be that it is not possible to use a Contribution Value source for an Entity Currency Adjs destination?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Julien

Hi,
I see another problem in what you're trying to do. First, let me state what you're trying to establish: you are trying to get a value from one entity (say A) to another entity (say B), be it at [Proportion], [Elimination], [Contribution], ...
My question is: how can you know that during the consolidation process, by the time your code runs on B, A has already been processed and [Proportion], [Elimination] are not empty (or contain values from a previous consolidation run)?
The answer is "You don't". Theoretically, you have no control as per the order in which entities are calculated/consolidated during the process. Even more complex is the thing that if you have a multi-core machine, more than one entities may run in parallel, but still you cannot force A to run before B. I have done some tests and I've seen that in a one processor setting the order that entities enter in the process of consolidation matches the order you have placed them in the consolidation tree in metadata. Still this thing is not documented as far as I know and therefore you cannot rely on this.
Finally, I have also seen that in a simple case (B pulls from A), if you run consolidation twice, then you definitely get correct values. By the time you make a change in A, you have to run consolidation twice again to make sure that you get the correct data. I believe that you see that what I'm describing is good for experimenting but not for releasing to a client.
I tend to think of such a design, as a practice to avoid.
--Kostas

Asset acq. contra account used in ABUMN (intracompany)

Dear gurus,
Can anyone explain why Acquisition contra account (AO90) is used during intracompany transfer (ABUMN) when a depreciation area <> '01' (<> than the main dep. area) posts to a non leading ledger?
The system creates 2 accounting docs, one for the leading ledger and another for the non leading ledger posting.
The non leading ledger posting has the same accounts as the leading ledger, except for 2 additional posting lines, one with a debit and another with a credit to the same aquisition contra account (thus posting with no real accounting impact).
Why is that, and is possible to avoid it?
thank you

Hi Sridevi
Thanks for your suggestions
if i will maintain G/L account for account determination in the T.code AO90 for deprecation area wise, is there any effects for another company codes and balance sheet wise
And also we are running depreciation since 2003, now suddenly it is coming into picture in the month of July. and may i know the reason. Are there any new patches are added in sap
And also if you donu2019t mind can you tell me what are purpose to maintain the Contra G/L account in the AO90.
Thanks and Regards
sudharshana vamsi

Carrying forward accounts with value as '0' (zero) for consolidation

Hi,
I have a query regarding carrying forward accounts with value as '0' (zero) for consolidation. Actually when there is any account having zero value then on calculating contribution the value is carried only to Parent Currency Total dimension. After proportion level the value for that account becomes null. Can anyone suggest if there is a way where i can carry the value 'zero' till value dimension "Contribution Total".
Thanks in advance

Hi,
couldn't you do a rule that copies from PCT to proportion level ( either this level or one above that lets you have rule input)

Account error: value does not exist in BB Company is displayed when Uploading a Journal to Oracle ADI Interface Table

Environment:
Oracle ADI version: version Oracle ADI 7.2.12.04.25 and patch number 9493800
Microsoft Office version: 2003
How to recreate incident:
1. Create a budget worksheet for a company
2. View the budget information
3. Upload budget information to the Interface Table
Actual Result:
Account error: Value <value> for the flexfield COMPANY does not exist in the value set BB_COMPANY. I have noticed the same error is displayed regardless of whether I select options from the combo boxes or enter random numbers in the journal i.e. 0000 for each field.
Expected Result:
Budget information to be uploaded successful especially when the data has not been amended
Questions:
1. What is happening to cause this problem?
2. What is the solution?

The issue is resolved, no need to answer, the dbconnection class was calling the wrong db :(

FI: HOw we can differentiate contra account items(offseting items) ?

HI,
Can anyone tell me how to identify the contra account items than normal items in BSEG table.
both accounts are maintained in HKONT field of BSEG, but which field will identify the same?
Mrunal

use field bseg-koart.
look at fm GET_GKONT
A.

Acqusition value negative in area 01

Hi All,
I'm settling inestment order but I get the erro message "Acqusition value negative in area 01",
Please assist how to solve it.

Hi
Please activate the "Negative values allowed" feild in the depreciation
area tab. You can do this by going to transaction code AS02. Double
click on the depreciation area 01 and then activate the "Negative
values feild".
By doing you can resolve your issue. There is no other way apart from
this option to resolve the issue.
The reason why we are asking you to have this feild activated because,
your configuration does not allow negative values into the asset.
If this is a AUC asset, I do not see any issue in having the feild
activated as this asset is a cost collector and will not have any issues
even if you allow negative values.
It is recommended that asset under constructions allow negative
values. The system can run into a temporary 'negative values' situation
during the calculation at time of a settlement.
In general for AuC you must allow negative values always.
See also SAP note 141656 where you can see how this can be done.
You find further information on the topic in SAP note 19048 which
says in under 'Solution':
"Generally, negative values should always be allowed for assets under
construction. You should therefore make this setting at asset class
level (Transaction OAYZ).
In the asset class of the AuCs in all depreciation areas, set the
'Negative values allowed' indicator (ANLB-XNEGA). Note that this change
only takes effect for fixed assets that are created after the indicator
is set. For existing fixed assets, set this indicator in the detail
screen of the depreciation areas in the asset master (Transaction AS02).
You may have to adjust the screen layout rule to do so.
Make this setting in AS02 for relevant individual assets.
Before you set the 'Negative values allowed' indicator, consider the
related Note 141656."
Best Regards,
Blaz

Contra account :Acqusition Value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for