Contract creation in SRM 7.0

Hi,
     We are using SRM 7.0 as backend ECC EH4. I want to create Global Outline Agreement (GCTR) in SRM which will replicate on ECC but I donu2019t want to use PI so thatu2019s why I mentioned system type ERP_2.0 instead of ERP_4.0 in Define System Landscape because I donu2019t want to use CCTR.
    Internal Number range in SRM and External Number Range in ECC for Contract is same. Document type GCTR defined in ECC and Transaction type in SRM is same.  Defined Message type COND_A (process code COND) and BLAORD (process code BLAO) in ECC system as Inbound Parameters.
    Badi BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE has been implemented in SRM for company code and
Badi  BBP_CTR has been Implemented in ECC for mapping company code .
    Same settings has been defined for SRM 5.0 and Contract has been replicated in backend system but in SRM 7.0  Contract is not replicating in ECC system as well as I am not getting any logs in WE05 , SMQ1 , SMQ2 , SLG1 , SMW01 , BBP_CTR_MON and RZ20 whereas in Contract Status it is showing RELEASED status.
    In many threads I read that if system type defined in System Landscape as ERP_2.0 or ERP_3.0 then PI is not mandatory and Contract or Purchase Order created through Idoc / BAPI. Is it possible or not or if possible then which settings I am missing or which monitoring transactions I have to use , please suggest me.
Regards,
Abhijeet

SAP Note 1268821 - SRM 7.0 / ERP 6.04: Config. of Central
Contract Management
but your requirement is different
IDOC technology they want to replace to XI .
but why do you hate to do XI
do you have any specific reason for this?
ehp3 - idoc works well.
PS:- check any posting error in BD87 - 51 STATUS ERROR CODE OR
BBPD_CTR_IDOCREF - CAN YOU SEE ANY CONTRACT THERE.
Muthu

Similar Messages

  • Contract Creation in SRM 7.0 classic scenario

    Hi All,
    We are using SRM 7.0 Classic scenario with ECC 6.0 EHP 4 and CLM 2. We are creating contracts in SAP CLM and pushing into as Global outline agreement.
    Question is  -
    1)  Can we  create  contracts in SRM 7.0 Classic scenario ?
    2) Instead of transfering the ECC outline agreement to SRM , can we directly use ECC outline agreement as a source of supply in SRM while creating a SC.
    3) How  we can  transfer the SAP CLM 2.0 contracts into SRM 7.0 and use a source of supply there while creating a SC ( Considereing that these CLM contratcs are also transfered to ECC as a outline agreement)
    What are the mandatory fields required to transfer the CLM contracts contracts to ECC  outline agreement -  I know ,Vendor, Purchase org, Pur grp, company code are required - is product catagory is also a mandatory field.
    Rgds/Pawan

    Hi Pawan,
    Please find the answered for your questions:
    Question is -
    1) Can we create contracts in SRM 7.0 Classic scenario ?
    Mitesh: Yes we can very well create in Classic Scenario as well in SRM 7.0.SC can be pushed to SOCO based on the Prod Category configuration in SPRO.From SOCO PO, Contract and RFX can be created for SC.
    2) Instead of transfering the ECC outline agreement to SRM , can we directly use ECC outline agreement as a source of supply in SRM while creating a SC.
    Mitesh: I dont think we can use ECC outline agreement as source of supply in SRM while creating SC.Contract replication in SRM 7.0 with EHP 4 ECC is eSOA based and ONLY Outbound to SRM (inbound to ECC).Contract cannot be replicated from ECC to SRM.
    3) How we can transfer the SAP CLM 2.0 contracts into SRM 7.0 and use a source of supply there while creating a SC ( Considereing that these CLM contratcs are also transfered to ECC as a outline agreement)
    +Mitesh: Standard intergeration of CLM/ESO to SRM 7.0 is very much there in roadmap for future releases of SRM/ESO.+
    +As of now there is a consulting solution available to integerate ECC and ESO/CLM.+
    +This logic can be leveraged to integrate ESO/CLM to SMR 7.0 (or lower version) requiring Developement effort from SRM functional,SRM technical,PI, Basis,ESO and java consultants.+
    +Such contracts can be forced to be used as Source of Supply or alternatively replicated to ECC Via standard repliation scenario.+
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Mitesh

  • Idoc settings for Backend Contract creation in SRM 5.0

    Hello,
    Im working on SRM 5.0 (HP 11) and want to create a Backend contract in R/3 (46C) directly.
    I do not need Local Contracts or GOAs en SRM!
    As I interprete the config guide for Sourcing (page 59 and 70-75, the scenario I need uses the BADIs:
    BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS   (determining Back End System)
    BBP_CTR_BE_CREATE (for Mapping SRM settings with R/3)
    I also understand that the Idoc configuration only needs to be done in the backend!!?  (page 73 / 74)
    Trx: WE42 and WE20.
    Is this correct? Or do I have to maintain also the the IDOCs config in the SRM system?
    Thanks for any clue.
    Aart

    Hi,
    Pls refer the foll thread for all settings:
    Follow-on contract from Bid Invitation
    BR,
    Disha.
    Do reward points for useful answers.

  • Purchase Contract creation in SRM

    Hi everybody,
    I have a requirement. I need to create purchase contracts in SRM. Data is comming as a file from Oracle server. I tried searching for a BAPI to create contract, not able to find it out. Tring to use eCATT for this. Transaction BBP_CTR_MAIN is giving error in the recording of eCATT.
    Pleae advice we how can I create the contracts in background from flat file.
    Thanks in advance.
    Mahitha

    Hi all experts,
    I was unsuccessful like some of the users here in trying to create a contract at the backend. I have tried using "BBP_PD_CTR_CREATE" but i alway get 2 error message: create exactly one vendor and create exactly one employee. What could be wrong with the codes??
    data: pc_id like CRMD_ORDERADM_H-OBJECT_ID.
    data: pc_header_out like BBP_PDS_CTR_HEADER_IC.
    data: pc_header_in like BBP_PDS_CTR_HEADER_D.
    *data: pc_item type table of BBP_PDS_CTR_ITEM_D with header line.
    data: pc_item type table of BBP_PDS_CTR_ITEM_ICU with header line.
    data: pc_text type table of BBP_PDS_LONGTEXT.
    data: pc_partner type table of BBP_PDS_PARTNER.
    data: wa_part like line of pc_partner.
    data: pc_org type table of BBP_PDS_ORG with header line.
    data: pc_message type table of BBP_PDS_MESSAGES with header line.
    Insert dummy data*****************************************************
    pc_header_out-CURRENCY = 'SGD'.
    pc_header_out-PROCESS_TYPE = 'PCTR'.
    Insert Purchase Org data *********************************************
    pc_org-PROC_ORG_RESP_ID = 'O 50000026'.
    pc_org-PROC_ORG_ID = 'O 50000025'.
    pc_org-PROC_GROUP_ID = 'O 50000026'.
    Insert BP data - vendor, employee Purch Org and DSTA******************
    *DSTA
    wa_part-PARTNER_ID = '0000000001'.
    wa_part-PARTNER_GUID = '4BD22A16AFA2B74D844E1595998AE7E5'.
    wa_part-PARTNER_FCT = '00000038'.
    wa_part-ADDR_TYPE = '1'.
    wa_part-ADDR_NO = '0000010469'.
    append wa_part to pc_partner.
    clear wa_part.
    *employee
    wa_part-PARTNER_ID = '0000000006'.
    wa_part-PARTNER_GUID = 'E3D4AAE842930D41B7B107F3CC60B44D'.
    wa_part-PARTNER_FCT = '00000026'.
    wa_part-ADDR_TYPE = '3'.
    wa_part-ADDR_NO = '0000010472'.
    wa_part-PERS_NO = '0000010474'.
    append wa_part to pc_partner.
    clear wa_part.
    *vendor
    wa_part-PARTNER_ID = '0000000311'.
    wa_part-PARTNER_GUID = 'F0BC646129BE2D4BB7E301F8F3708B1E'.
    wa_part-PARTNER_FCT = '00000019'.
    wa_part-ADDR_TYPE = '1'.
    append wa_part to pc_partner.
    clear wa_part.
    *purch org
    wa_part-PARTNER_ID = '0000000002'.
    wa_part-PARTNER_GUID = '48459C575651D04091BAF1B9A554CF51'.
    wa_part-PARTNER_FCT = '00000051'.
    wa_part-ADDR_TYPE = '1'.
    wa_part-ADDR_NO = '0000010470'.
    append wa_part to pc_partner.
    clear wa_part.
    Item data
    pc_item-CATEGORY_ID = 'ARMOUR'.
    pc_item-QUANTITY = '233'.
    pc_item-PRICE = '1234'.
    pc_item-VALUE = '4321'.
    pc_item-UNIT = 'EA'.
    pc_item-PRODUCT = 'B78A60018B6018418F6D0F1632E10F69'.
    pc_item-DESCRIPTION = 'Russian T72 Tanks'.
    *--Reset Buffer Tables
    CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PROCDOC_RESET_BUFFER'.
    Create PC*************************************************************
    call function 'BBP_PD_CTR_CREATE'
      exporting
        I_HEADER = pc_header_out
      importing
        E_HEADER = pc_header_in
      tables
        I_ITEM = pc_item
        E_PARTNER = pc_partner
        I_ORGDATA = pc_org
        I_LONGTEXT = pc_text
        E_MESSAGES = pc_message.
    write: pc_header_in-guid.
    the guid will be all 0s due to the error..... Thanks for taking time to read this. I will really appreciate if anyone is able to help me solve this. Of course point will be rewarded. Thanks again!

  • IDOC transfer during Contract Creation

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement with the contract creation in SRM contract management.
    Do you Know which IDOCs is/are transmitted to the ERP during a contract creation?
    Thanks in Advance!
    Martin.

    Hi Martin,
    To add further to Claudia's note, Message Types "BLAORD" & "COND_A" are set-up in ECC as incoming. There is no Mesage Type set-up for these (as OUTBOUND) on SRM side.
    In SRM, Message Type "BLAREL" should be set-up as INBOUND. This carries the release information for the contract from ECC to SRM.
    Cheers,
    Akash

  • SRM 7.01 Backend Contracts creation with XI/PI ESOA Service

    Hello, we are implementing SRM 7.01 PPS with Extended Classic Scenario. We need to create contracts backend contracts ( ECC) from RFX RESPONSE at SRM. As we have ECC 6.0 EHP 5 we have to use Esoa services. The problem is that we have set up PI but no contract is created at ECC ( not even in SRM) when we pressed button "  create contracts" from rfx response even thought the message at SRM is " contracts XXXXXX created" I think we are missing some customizing in ECC.
    We have already implemented badi BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS
    I read note 1268821 who explains that we have to activate business function LOG_MM_P2PSE_1 in ECC but I think this only apply for "CENTRAL CONTRACTS" and we dont want to use central contracts. We just want to creates contracts at ECC from rfx response in SRM. I couldn´t find any documentation about this, just for Central Contracts or backend contracts creation (through idocs) . Any idea?
    Thanks in advance for your help!
    Best Regards
    Liam

    The first interface that try to get out from SRM was " PurchasingContractERPRequest_Out_V1", thus based on this interface we made the configuration on PI. So, after pressing button " create contract" on srm if we execute tx SXI_MONITOR in SRM we found the interface " PurchasingContractERPRequest_Out_V1" and in the backend system ( ECC) at tv SXI_MONITOR we found interface PurchasingContractERPRequest_In_V1 for this contract with black and white flag ( processed successfully) but no contract created in ECC not even SRM.
    Anyway we have checked that inbound proxy  is executed but we dont see any contract created
    Is this the right Interface? We are missing something?
    Best regads and thanks again for your help!

  • SRM contract creation date

    Hi, y'all
    Reckon where contract creation date is in SRM?  What table is it on?
    I've Googled and Googled.  Can't find a clue.
    Any documentation on the tables in SRM?
    Thanks.

    Hi Perry,
    How about table CRMD_ORDERADM_H?
    You should be able to find the creation date time of SRM document in this table.
    Please let me know if I have any misunderstanding of your query.
    Best regards,
    Wendy

  • No Pre-commitment at PR creation time in ECC -issue at PO creation in SRM

    Hi all,
    We are on SRM 5.0 Extendec CLassic with ECC 6.0
    I have a couple of questions wrt budget check and commitment creation in SRM.
    1.When a PRis transferred from ECC to SRM,is the budget check possible?If yes,what are the settings in ECC/SRM?
    2. After a PR is transferred to SRM,SC gets created.When creating a SC,is the budget check done?If so,if the funds are available,is acommitment posted to ECC?
    3.IF the Budget check error was not encountered at the time of SC creation,while creating a PO,why does the system gives error that "Funds not available".Is this correct?
    We have somePR's(inventory) which get transferred to SRM,but after the SC is created and aPO is issued for that SC,systemchecks the budget and throws an error that funds not available.
    What we want is that at the time ofPR creation itself,system should check the funds and disallow PRcreation if funda are not available.
    Can anyone tell me whether we need to implement the controlin  ECC at the of PR creation or is this issue because of no commitment happening at SC level?
    Please clarify.

    Hi Muthu/Virendra and other xperts,
    Any suggestions?

  • Extension of a user exit in R/3, called on PO creation by SRM(SRM 5.0,class

    Hi All,
    I am new to SRM technical,I need the user-exit which is called in R3 on PO creation by SRM.
    I have to perform some checks and validation for the tax code in the exit(It may be badi also) befor creating PO in R3.
    Please tell me the User-exit as soon as possible and help to sort this problem.
    Thanks in advance.
    Ankur

    Hi Sachin,
    I want user exit in R3 not in EBP.
    This the orignal requirement....
    Extension of a user exit in R/3, called on PO creation. If document type = EC (PO from EBP) and an ERS vendor has been chosen on the order, re-use some of the logic/code/lookup table entries which currently determine the tax code automatically for interface orders for where ERS flag is ticked on vendor.
    Now please help me.
    Thanks

  • Waring messages for PO Date in the contract creation?

    Hi Friends,
    Expecting answers with some functional knowledge,
    I am developing one webservice to create value contract from dotnet front end,
    So user can enter inputs from that front end and he will get SAP generated value contract id.
    Here I did validations for all the fields and giving error messages to restrict user to dont give incorrect values.
    Now coming to my issue..,
    While entering the PO Date in the initial screen of contract creation,
    If I enter future date,
    The purchase order date lies in the future. Please check
    If I enter the past date.,
    The purchase order date is in the past. Please check
    I will get warning messages like this, so what should i do, I can enter, today's date to avoid these messages,
    And I can neglect these two messages to proceed, as they are warings only.
    But in my case , Can i process these messages to front end, Is it mandatory.
    I want to know the intention of these messages, then i will take good decision on this...,
    Thanks,
    Naveen.I

    Hi..,
       Thanks for your attention..,
    After consulting some people on this issue, I got that..,
    Mostly PO Date is current date, but in the case of purchage receiving process is late then the date may be in past..,
    Similerly, because of some business reason we can create contract before receiving of purchage order, where order should
    must get, in this case user can enter future date.
    So as if it is not special case user creates contrat with po date as current date, system gives some warning!!
    Better to pass this messages to front end if we are using webservices or some thing like other technolgies.
    welcome to other comments on this..
    Thanks,
    Naveen.I

  • Issue with Contract Replication from SRM to MDM  - XML structure

    Hi
    We are having an issue with trnsfering a contract to MDM. We have released the contract for update to MDM in the contract through the distribute to catalog option. An XML is generated in SRM that gets sucessfully passed to PI through Catalogupdatenotification_out. In PI the XML fails in the Interface Determination step. the issue that has been noticed is that the XML that is generated in SRM does not contain product category or product ID which is basically what the condition mapping in PI checks for. The conditions in PI were setup as per SAP.
    But now the XML fails in PI because it does not find a combination for Catalog type code = 03 and product category. Please find the XML structure in SRM and you will see that it does not have a product category even though the contract has one.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    - <n0:CatalogTransmission xmlns:n0="http://sap.com/xi/EBP" xmlns:prx="urn:sap.com:proxy:SS1:/1SAI/TASDE808778FFEB81012891:701:2010/10/07">
    - <StandardBusinessDocumentHeader>
      <ID schemeID="0080">56000004100000000220110616202243</ID>
      <CreationDateTime>2011-06-16T20:22:43Z</CreationDateTime>
    - <SenderParty>
      <InternalID schemeID="PartyID" schemeAgencyID="SS1CLNT100">143</InternalID>
      </SenderParty>
      </StandardBusinessDocumentHeader>
    - <Catalog>
      <ID>5600000410</ID>
      <CatalogTypeCode>03</CatalogTypeCode>
    - <NameList>
      <Name>(Copy of Contract 5600000395)</Name>
      </NameList>
      <ActionCode>04</ActionCode>
      <CompleteTransmissionIndicator>true</CompleteTransmissionIndicator>
    - <ValidityDateTimePeriod>
      <StartDateTime>2011-06-13T12:00:00Z</StartDateTime>
      <EndDateTime>2012-06-12T12:00:00Z</EndDateTime>
      </ValidityDateTimePeriod>
    - <CatalogContent>
    - <ItemList>
    - <Item>
      <ID>1</ID>
      <ActionCode>04</ActionCode>
      <CompleteTransmissionIndicator>false</CompleteTransmissionIndicator>
    - <PropertyValuationList>
    - <PropertyValuation>
      <PropertyReference>/CCM/PRICE</PropertyReference>
    - <PropertyValues>
    - <MultipleValue>
      <Index>1</Index>
    - <SimpleValue>
      <AmountSpecification currencyCode="USD">1.0</AmountSpecification>
      </SimpleValue>
      </MultipleValue>
      </PropertyValues>
      </PropertyValuation>
    - <PropertyValuation>
      <PropertyReference>/CCM/PRICE_BASIS_QUANTITY</PropertyReference>
    - <PropertyValues>
    - <SimpleValue>
      <QuantitySpecification unitCode="EA">1.0</QuantitySpecification>
      </SimpleValue>
      </PropertyValues>
      </PropertyValuation>
    - <PropertyValuation>
      <PropertyReference>CCM/PMNTTRMS</PropertyReference>
    - <PropertyValues>
    - <SimpleValue>
      <NameSpecification>0002</NameSpecification>
      </SimpleValue>
      </PropertyValues>
      </PropertyValuation>
      </PropertyValuationList>
      </Item>
    - <Item>
      <ID>2</ID>
      <ActionCode>04</ActionCode>
      <CompleteTransmissionIndicator>false</CompleteTransmissionIndicator>
    - <PropertyValuationList>
    - <PropertyValuation>
      <PropertyReference>/CCM/PRICE</PropertyReference>
    - <PropertyValues>
    - <MultipleValue>
      <Index>1</Index>
    - <SimpleValue>
      <AmountSpecification currencyCode="USD">12.0</AmountSpecification>
      </SimpleValue>
      </MultipleValue>
      </PropertyValues>
      </PropertyValuation>
    - <PropertyValuation>
      <PropertyReference>/CCM/PRICE_BASIS_QUANTITY</PropertyReference>
    - <PropertyValues>
    - <SimpleValue>
      <QuantitySpecification unitCode="EA">1.0</QuantitySpecification>
      </SimpleValue>
      </PropertyValues>
      </PropertyValuation>
    - <PropertyValuation>
      <PropertyReference>CCM/PMNTTRMS</PropertyReference>
    - <PropertyValues>
    - <SimpleValue>
      <NameSpecification>0002</NameSpecification>
      </SimpleValue>
      </PropertyValues>
      </PropertyValuation>
      </PropertyValuationList>
      </Item>
      </ItemList>
      </CatalogContent>
      </Catalog>
      </n0:CatalogTransmission>
    Edited by: vishakhrajeev123 on Jun 20, 2011 6:49 PM

    Dear Krupa,
    Thank you for your quick reply.
    So we should consider the scenario where SRM is the central repository for the contracts, and all the changes done in SRM should be replicated to ERP.
    In this scenario, do you know which steps should be done to allow contract replication from SRM to ERP? I already created a central contract in SRM but there is no message sent to PI.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Andreia

  • Central contract functionality in SRM 7.0?

    Dear Experts,
    I would like to have few clarifications about central contract functionality in SRM 7.0.
    As per understanding, from SRM 7.0, there is no two separate documents like local contract and GOA (global outline agreement--contract for backend ERP systems). Now, SRM have only one document -Central contract to be used in sourcing for various backend systems as well as the SRM system itself.
    Now, my question is as below:
    Since the central contract is released into various backend ERP systems, do the backend requisitions needed to be transferred to SRM system to use the central contract as a source of supply . or the backend requisitions can be assigned to the central contract in the ERP system systems itself (without sending it to SRM system ) and released to suppliers?
    Your inputs will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan

    Hi,
    From ERP 6.0 EhP4, ERP transactions can look at SRM central contracts.
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/52/43df4725704c6393a49a4d671e0f59/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Masa

  • MWST condition type missing in contract creation,VA41

    Hi, got a problem here during contract creation. I can't get the MWST show up in the contract condition tab. Analysis result :
    010 Access not made (requirement not fulfilled)
    Error Message : Pricing error: Mandatory condition MWST is missing
    Things I have done :
    a) checked pricing procedure V/08
    b) created condition records VK11
    c) checked customer tax classification : Liable for taxes
    d) checked material tax data : Full tax
    e) ???
    what else did I miss out?
    Thanks
    Andy

    Option 1: If you do not want MWST condition as mandatory, then remove the check from check box in the pricing procedure (T.Code: V/08). MWST is tax condition & Tax condition are normally not mandatory, as it may vary according to Business Requirement.
    Option 2: <b>"010 Access not made (requirement not fulfilled)"</b>: Check the access sequence maintained for Condition Type MWST (T.Code": V/06). Next, Check the Access Sequence & the access 010 assigned to it. (T.Code:V/07). Check whether Accesses & fields are assigned correctly.
    Option 3: Instead of maintaining condition record for access 010, maintain for different combination & check the result. Even in my case, once the access with reference to tax classification did not give desired result, but was achieved bu maintaining another combination.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka
    Reward points if helpful.

  • How to create contract in SAP-SRM via a bespoke?

    Hi All,
    I got one requirement to create contract in SAP-SRM via a bespoke interface from the sourcing workbench.
    How to create contract in SRM via a bespoke?
    Even I don't know what is a bespoke. I belong to SAP bw platform
    kindly give me the solution.
    Thanx in advance,
    Ravi.

    Hi
    <b>Bespoke</b> <u>means</u> <b><u>Customer development</u></b>.
    So you can create Shopping carts, either automatically via logging to SRM portal or programmatically using Bespoke developments / programs.
    <b>BAPI Function module -  'BBP_PD_SC_CREATE_EXTERNAL' is used to create shopping cart from portal with other function modules.</b>
    <u>Also you can use RFC BBP_PD_SC_CREATE function module for Creating Shopping Cart.</u>
    <b>Create Shopping cart (or PO) in SRM/EBP from a flat file</b>  
    /message/3529548#3529548 [original link is broken]
    Create Shopping cart (or PO) in SRM/EBP from a flat file
    Function Module's for Shopping Cart.
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Payment method in Contract Creation

    Hi,
    Was just wondering why the payment method i entered during contract creation (Goto > Header > Financial Accounting > Pmnt method) does not kick in during payment run. What happens is that the payment method defined in the master record is being used instead of the one i indicated. Kindly advise. Thanks.

    Hi,
    This is because when you are trying to release the Contract using OR......system first search for payment method u have assigned for the particular material assigned to particular contract customer.
    If nothing is available there only than system picks payment method from the contract.
    Hope it helps.
    Raj

Maybe you are looking for

  • Back ground job problem for CJI3

    Hi Iam converting the standard CJI3   TCODE   into zcji3 when I execute manually iam getting all the data. but I schedule(in the background job)   that program i am not getting  all the fields data .what could be the problem this is immd please repso

  • SDE_ORA_CodeDimension_Flex_KFF_DFF_Load

    Has anyone experienced this problem? apps 7.9.6.2 off HRMS 12.1.1 Informatica 8.6.1 hotfix 11 dac patch 10052370 running the SDE_ORA_CodeDimension_Flex_JobFunction SELECT 'CODE', 'DESCRIPTION', 'CODE_ID', 'CATEGORY' FROM DUAL UNION SELECT LOOKUP_CODE

  • Ora-01031 insufficient privileges in oracle

    Hi All, I have a case where in i have upgraded my oracle 10.2.0.2 to 10.2.0.4 in solaris env. After upgrade i am able to start and use the system but when i schedule a job in DB13 for ex update statis. it is giving an error ora-01031 insufficient pri

  • Can I use RequestDispatcher to invoke services in another context?

    Hello I have two web applications one using JAXM (App A) and the other a JSP application (App B). Both applications need to update the same database. What is the best way to do this? I was thinking that I should create a third servlet based web app (

  • SQL Azure with Azure Virtual Machine inside Virtual Network - How to connect

    Hi Team, I have one typical scenario where there is one Windows Application I wan to run from my Windows Azure Virtual Machine which is inside Azure Virtual Network (which has its DNS and ADFS and etc..) Because its Virtual Network, We can't access i