IDOC transfer during Contract Creation

Hi All,
I have a requirement with the contract creation in SRM contract management.
Do you Know which IDOCs is/are transmitted to the ERP during a contract creation?
Thanks in Advance!
Martin.

Hi Martin,
To add further to Claudia's note, Message Types "BLAORD" & "COND_A" are set-up in ECC as incoming. There is no Mesage Type set-up for these (as OUTBOUND) on SRM side.
In SRM, Message Type "BLAREL" should be set-up as INBOUND. This carries the release information for the contract from ECC to SRM.
Cheers,
Akash

Similar Messages

  • Issues during Contract creation using Inbound IDOC BLAORD03

    Dear Experts,
    We need to create Contract using Inbound IDOC BLAORD03.
    I am facing following issues and need some one's help ASAP.
    (1) Contract is generated without  Header Texts and Item Texts through IDOC BLAORD03 .
    (2) Not able to create CONTRACT for service masters using Inbound IDOC BLAORD03.
    Is there any body who has implemented this scenario and able to guide ?
    Looking forward to help ASAP.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Best Regards,
    Mitesh Desai
    [email protected]

    Hi All,
    I am also facing the same issue. I am trying to upload service outline agreements thru LSMW using  idoc basiv type BLAORD03 ( FM->IDOC_INPUT_BLAORD).
    Immediate help highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Vijender

  • Warning on Item price during contract and PO creation

    Hi Experts,
    When I create a contract, I put a material with mat. code and expect the system takes the standard price in the accounting tab of the material master.
    1/  Is there a way the system picks up the price auto. from the material master ?
    i.e. syst. warning during contract creation when I put the mat. code : +Effective price is 0.00, material price is 10.00 + 
    I do not understand why the syst. gives me this message (I have a standard price of 100 in MM and I put a net price of 100 during contract creation)
    2/  During PO creation, the syst. picks up the item price from the contract but I receive this message :
    Effective price is 100.00, material price is 10.00
    Again, I do not understand how the syst. indicates the mat. price at 10 (while I put 100 in MM and 100 in contract item level).
    Could anyone helps on this topic?
    Thanks in advance for your help.

    Any inputs will be much appreciated. Thanks

  • MWST condition type missing in contract creation,VA41

    Hi, got a problem here during contract creation. I can't get the MWST show up in the contract condition tab. Analysis result :
    010 Access not made (requirement not fulfilled)
    Error Message : Pricing error: Mandatory condition MWST is missing
    Things I have done :
    a) checked pricing procedure V/08
    b) created condition records VK11
    c) checked customer tax classification : Liable for taxes
    d) checked material tax data : Full tax
    e) ???
    what else did I miss out?
    Thanks
    Andy

    Option 1: If you do not want MWST condition as mandatory, then remove the check from check box in the pricing procedure (T.Code: V/08). MWST is tax condition & Tax condition are normally not mandatory, as it may vary according to Business Requirement.
    Option 2: <b>"010 Access not made (requirement not fulfilled)"</b>: Check the access sequence maintained for Condition Type MWST (T.Code": V/06). Next, Check the Access Sequence & the access 010 assigned to it. (T.Code:V/07). Check whether Accesses & fields are assigned correctly.
    Option 3: Instead of maintaining condition record for access 010, maintain for different combination & check the result. Even in my case, once the access with reference to tax classification did not give desired result, but was achieved bu maintaining another combination.
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka
    Reward points if helpful.

  • Payment method in Contract Creation

    Hi,
    Was just wondering why the payment method i entered during contract creation (Goto > Header > Financial Accounting > Pmnt method) does not kick in during payment run. What happens is that the payment method defined in the master record is being used instead of the one i indicated. Kindly advise. Thanks.

    Hi,
    This is because when you are trying to release the Contract using OR......system first search for payment method u have assigned for the particular material assigned to particular contract customer.
    If nothing is available there only than system picks payment method from the contract.
    Hope it helps.
    Raj

  • Outbound delivery creation with inbound IDOC transfer from Java system

    Dear Experts,
           The scenario we are having is really very interesting. Hopefully its a good learning for me and also for others also.
    The scenario is,
                   After sales order creation the details will be sent to one Non SAP system (Java) for performing some tasks related to forwarding agent decision, shipping date and etc. Once the details are finalized in that Java system then, the details needs to be transferred to SAP as "Inbound IDOC" process. For this proposed to use the SAP Jco middle ware.
                 Once the details transfered from Java system to SAP then, the outbound IDOC needs to get generated automatically. Assuming the stock for that sales order line item is available. Also one more complexity is, our client is using custom transaction (ZVl10C) for delivery creation.
    Now Query is,
                   1. Which IDOC, message type and Functional module needs to be used for creating the delivery automatically..??
                   2. As per assumption, stock of that sales order line item should be available. Due to some business reason the stock was removed during inbound IDOC transfer then, what will happen to the IDOC..?. How to avoid this situation..??
                   3. As we told we are re going to use SAP Jco b/w SAP & Java system. In this case, how the data will get transfered from Java system to SAP..?
    Thanks in advance for the replies I am going to get
    Regards,
    VEL

    Didn't get any feedback from experts for long time. So we are closing the question

  • Automatic contract creation during BP creation

    Hi Experts,
    Please give me the configuration part for the below functionality
    Create a contract account automatically when we create a new business partner or a new role for an existing business partner.
    Regards,
    Srikanth.M

    Automatic Contract Account Creation During BP Creation  
    Use
    You can use this function in Media Sales and Distribution to have the system create a contract account automatically when you create a new business partner (BP) or a new role for an existing business partner. For example, this is useful when processing orders in Media Product Sales and Distribution that require an existing contract account for processing.
    If a contract account already exists for the business partner, the system does not create an additional one.
    Prerequisites
    You have activated the business function  Media, Subscription Management 2 (MED_MSD_1). If you use SAP Media Sales and Advertising North America Extension, please see also the release notes for this business function.
    You should have assigned a contract account template to the role in question in the Customizing settings for the SAP Business Partner for Media Companies under Contract Account Assignment ® Define Contract Account Templates. If you create a business partner in several roles and different templates are assigned for these roles, you can specify a priority to determine which contract account the system is to use as the template.
    Please note that you need a template business partner in order to create a contract account template. The contract account template must not have an incoming or outgoing payment method, since these fields are business partner-specific and would be overwritten by the function for automatic contract account creation.
    Features
    The following functions can be used to create a new contract account automatically during business partner creation:
    ●      Maintain Business Partner (transaction BP)
    ●      Data transfer function for the SAP Business Partner (transaction KCLJ)
    ●      Creation in background processing (used in the Customer Interaction Center, in the Internet Application Components, and in fast entry)
    Please note that you cannot create a contract account automatically if you create business partners using the BAPI BAPIBUSISM007_CREATEFROMDATA.

  • Using Inbound IDOC from Java system creation of Outbound delivery

    Dear Experts,
    The scenario we are having is really very interesting. Hopefully its a good learning for me and also for others also.
    The scenario is,
    After sales order creation the details will be sent to one Non SAP system (Java) for performing some tasks related to forwarding agent decision, shipping date and etc. Once the details are finalized in that Java system then, the details needs to be transferred to SAP as "Inbound IDOC" process. For this proposed to use the SAP Jco middle ware.
    Once the details transfered from Java system to SAP then, the outbound IDOC needs to get generated automatically. Assuming the stock for that sales order line item is available. Also one more complexity is, our client is using custom transaction (ZVl10C) for delivery creation.
    Now Query is,
    1. Which IDOC, message type and Functional module needs to be used for creating the delivery automatically..??
    2. As per assumption, stock of that sales order line item should be available. Due to some business reason the stock was removed during inbound IDOC transfer then, what will happen to the IDOC..?. How to avoid this situation..??
    3. As we told we are re going to use SAP Jco b/w SAP & Java system. In this case, how the data will get transfered from Java system to SAP..?
    Thanks in advance for the replies I am going to get
    Regards,
    VEL

    Thanks for the feedback. This question is resolved

  • Error while ORDERS05 IDoc transfer from R3 - PI - SNC

    Hi Friends,
    I am facing error in PI SXMB_MONI for ORDERS05 IDoc transfer from R3 - PI - SNC.
    I have done all the configuration setup in Integration Directory for the Scenario, I am able to successfully send the IDOC for PO from R3 to PI but faced the following Error in PI.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Message Split According to Receiver List
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PARTY_SERVICE</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      *<SAP:Stack>Party and service not defined</SAP:Stack>*
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    Also I am unable to Configure Sender/Receiver ID in PI > SXMB_ADMIN > Configuration, as while defining Sender/Receiver  unable to add the Interface for Sender(ORDERS.ORDERS05)/Reciever(ReplenishmentOrderNotificatio_Out) although I am able to see the same in Integration Repository.
    Also In Main message(Part of the message) as shown below, I am able to see Vendor in PARTY Element of xml message for which I have created the PO
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Message Split According to Receiver List
      -->
    - <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
    - <SOAP:Header>
    - <SAP:Main xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:wsu="http://www.docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" versionMajor="003" versionMinor="000" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1" wsu:Id="wsuid-main-92ABE13F5C59AB7FE10000000A1551F7">
      <SAP:MessageClass>ApplicationMessage</SAP:MessageClass>
      <SAP:ProcessingMode>asynchronous</SAP:ProcessingMode>
      <SAP:MessageId>0050568F-24A0-1DDD-B9F5-3F6DD541FF93</SAP:MessageId>
      <SAP:TimeSent>2009-01-21T10:55:20Z</SAP:TimeSent>
    - <SAP:Sender>
      <SAP:Service>SAPECC6</SAP:Service>
      <SAP:Interface namespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages">ORDERS.ORDERS05</SAP:Interface>
      </SAP:Sender>
    - <SAP:Receiver>
      <SAP:Party agency="SAPECC6" scheme="ALE#LI#LF">0000000006</SAP:Party>
      <SAP:Service />
      <SAP:Interface namespace="urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages">ORDERS.ORDERS05</SAP:Interface>
      <SAP:Mapping notRequired="Y" />
      </SAP:Receiver>
    Please Suggest the steps needs to be done for resolving the Issue.
    Thanks all...
    Regards,
    Nitin
    Edited by: Nitin Patil on Jan 21, 2009 12:18 PM

    Hi Nitin,
       I completed the configuraiton but the PO came in PI successfully but stuck in PI with error
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Call Adapter
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="PLAINHTTP_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_SERVER</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>500</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2>Internal Server Error</SAP:P2>
      <SAP:P3>Error during parsing of SOAP header</SAP:P3>
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:Stack>HTTP server code 500 reason Internal Server Error explanation Error during parsing of SOAP header</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    can you please help what is the problem , I am not able to find out.
    Thanks,
    Menaga

  • SRM 7.01 Backend Contracts creation with XI/PI ESOA Service

    Hello, we are implementing SRM 7.01 PPS with Extended Classic Scenario. We need to create contracts backend contracts ( ECC) from RFX RESPONSE at SRM. As we have ECC 6.0 EHP 5 we have to use Esoa services. The problem is that we have set up PI but no contract is created at ECC ( not even in SRM) when we pressed button "  create contracts" from rfx response even thought the message at SRM is " contracts XXXXXX created" I think we are missing some customizing in ECC.
    We have already implemented badi BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS
    I read note 1268821 who explains that we have to activate business function LOG_MM_P2PSE_1 in ECC but I think this only apply for "CENTRAL CONTRACTS" and we dont want to use central contracts. We just want to creates contracts at ECC from rfx response in SRM. I couldn´t find any documentation about this, just for Central Contracts or backend contracts creation (through idocs) . Any idea?
    Thanks in advance for your help!
    Best Regards
    Liam

    The first interface that try to get out from SRM was " PurchasingContractERPRequest_Out_V1", thus based on this interface we made the configuration on PI. So, after pressing button " create contract" on srm if we execute tx SXI_MONITOR in SRM we found the interface " PurchasingContractERPRequest_Out_V1" and in the backend system ( ECC) at tv SXI_MONITOR we found interface PurchasingContractERPRequest_In_V1 for this contract with black and white flag ( processed successfully) but no contract created in ECC not even SRM.
    Anyway we have checked that inbound proxy  is executed but we dont see any contract created
    Is this the right Interface? We are missing something?
    Best regads and thanks again for your help!

  • Chek System and User status during Equipment creation (IE01)

    Hi gurus
    I need to check if the system state I0180-NPRT is set by teh use during the creation of an equipment.
    I tried to use the FM BAPI_EQUI_GETSTATUS and ITO3_EQUIPMENT_READ_STATUS with the exit IEQM0003, but both FM doesn't retrieve any status during the creation of the equipment (IE01), while both work fine during change operation (IE02).
    Someboday has an idea, regarding the right FM to use for solve my issue ???
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Claudio

    For the first part of your query refer to the technical forums.
    For the second part - refer to Idoc - LOIPRO01, it has a segment for Order status, that should be of interest.
    Attn Moderators
    I think it would be better to move this thread to a technical forum, so the requester can get the most relevant information.

  • Storage bin Type Change during TO creation

    Hi friends
    Is it possible to change Storage Bin type (Not Storage bin no)during Transfer Order (TO) creation in LT06 / LT04 ? If so please let em know the procedure to bring storage bin type during TO creation.
    Please confirm
    Rgds
    Madhavan

    Hi,
    Please check and try to define Storage Bin Type (SPRO->LE->master data->storage bins), then activate  Storage Bin type search strategy in OMM1.as appropriate. (in my past experience system given priority to Storage type search and then to Storage BIn type search during picking- I am not sure whether this is the SAP logic or priority).
    Once you define and assing the Storage bin type to Bins this will be available during creation of TO.
    Hope this helps.
    Thx
    MJ

  • User Exit/ Badi for Changing Quant parameters during TO Creation

    Hi Gurus,
    Could you please guide me to advice the User Exit/Badi which can be used for changing Quant Data during TO Creation.
    User Requirement: Using "Recepient Field" in MIGO as a Key Value for FIFO in WM during goods issue. Receipient is copied into TR and TO (Standard SAP Functionality). For the purpose of Stock Removal based on Receipient Value, we need to copy this value into Quant Data field named Certificate Number ("LQUA-ZEUGN").
    I will highly appreciate reply from Gurus.
    Regards,
    Gupta M

    Hi manish,
    Use the Exit MWMTO001 for this purpose and modify the table accordingly. This will solve your problem.
    Thanks,
    Shibashis

  • Error message during cube creation

    Hi expert,
    System show the following error message during cube creation, please info how to solve this problem. Thanks.
    Define the characteristics of the validity table for non-cumulatives
    Message no. R7846
    Diagnosis
    The InfoCube contains non-cumulative values. A validity table is created for these non-cumulative values, in which the time interval is stored, for which the non-cumulative values are valid.
    The validity table automatically contains the "most detailed" of the selected time characteristics (if such a one does not exist, it must be defined by the user, meaning transfered into the InfoCube).
    Besides the most detailed time characteristic, additional characteristics for the InfoCube can be included in the validity table:
    Examples of such characteristics are:
    A "plan/actual" indicator, if differing time references exist for plan and actual values (actual values for the current fiscal year, plan values already for the next fiscal year),
    the characteristic "plant", if the non-cumulative values are reported per plant, and it can occur that a plant already exists for plant A for a particular time period, but not yet for plant B.
    Procedure
    Define all additional characteristics that should be contained in the validity table by selecting the characteristics.
    In the example above, the characteristics "plan/actual" and  "plant" must be selected.
    The system automatically generates the validity table according to the definition made. This table is automatically updated when data is loaded.

    Hi,
    Go to the Extras Tab in the definition of the Cube and there select " Maintain Non-Cumulatives" and there select the Plant check box. You can also check Material but it is not recommended. Now try to activate the cube. I think it will work for you.

  • Error during PO creation "Total BED % rate exceeds 100 % "

    Hi.
    Its concerned to Indian Excice.
    Error during the creation of PO is " Total BED % rate exceeds 100 % " ,
    ( Message no. 8I453).
    And you pls note in J1ID its 16% maintained for that perticular chapter id and its 100% for BED in tax code.
    Can you pls tell me the reason for this error.
    Regds

    Hi Santosh,
    362 is not maintained for BASB,but its maintained for condition type JMO1(IN:A/P BED Deductable) & JMO2(IN: A/P BED non deduct )in <b>AltCTy</b> field.
    And For BASB 605 is maintained in the field AltCBV.
    Can you Pls explain the significance of this alternative calculation type.
    Regds

Maybe you are looking for

  • What is the "admin" user in EAS Console?

    I am still relatively new to Planning and Essbase.   I am trying to figure out the relevance of "admin" user in the Essbase Administration Console.  My colleague and I have seen several instances of this admin user in EAS console but it doesn't appea

  • Tab distance in Pages when using List and Tab

    Has anyone else noticed that sometime in the last update or 2 that the distance the TAB shortcut, or the --> arrow (under Inspector>List) moves the cursor is double the distance it used to be? The reason I noticed is because I have a few reports on t

  • Custom fields in webdynpro SRM 7.0 while upgrade from SRM 5.0

    Hi Experts, We are upgrading from SRM 5.0 to 7.0. We created 2 custom fields using configure field control in Meta data handling (SPRO) and enabled them for visibility. When we tried to see these two custom fields, they didnt appear in the web dynpro

  • Electronic Signature Recommendations

    My department is currently looking at accepting e-signatures on our contracts.  However, we would like the signature to actually look like a wet signature, not just a typed name, we would also like some sort of validation that the name on the form is

  • How to add app custom list on "Trace your work" main dashboard in PWA.

    Hello All, As i have one custom list in my PWA site that list i want on "TRACE YOUR WORK", main dashboard. How can i link?? Regards REGARDS DANISH DANIE