Contract details i.e currency, Payment term are not copied into Call-off

Hi,
We have implemented SRM 4.0 (SP07) with extended classic scenario.
we created a PO through "Process Purchase order" & referred a line item to a contract (in the sense we are creating a call off) however when PO is ordered, system doesn't pick currency, Payment term & incoterm
maintained in contract header level into PO header but instead pick
that data from Vendor master in SRM (BBPMAININT).
Here is what we have maintained in Contract & Vendor master.
Contract No: 4800002324
Contract Currency: Euro
Payment Term: 60 days net
Inco term: CIF
Vendor master details
Vendor no: 106864
Currency: SEK
Payment term:030N
Inco term: DDP
If we perform similar test in R/3 then system behaves according to
standard.System copies currency, payment term & incoterm from contract header into PO header.
If this behaviour is possible in R/3 then why not in SRM ?
Has anybody witness simmilar problem in SRM so far..?
Any help will be awarded with full points..
BR
Bharat M

Hi
Note 970992 - Purchase order currency overwritten by partner dflt currency
The standard functionality is that the vendor master currency supersedes the SC currency as the final PO is generated for the vendor with whom the company is dealing in a particular currency.
Re: Currency USD differs from Purchase order currency EUR. Enter in PO cur
As per the old accounting system the journal books were maintained for every business partners in his currency. These entries comes to the G/L of the company in company's home currency.So it is the standard functionality that the PO will be generated in vendor master currency and not the SC currency.
Related links ->
Re: Currency Issue
How to maintain a Vendor currency in SRM
Hope this will help. Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Similar Messages

The payment terms are not getting reflected in PO

Hi,
We are in SRM5.0 Extended Classic scenario.
We have created new payment term in ECC and transferred to SRM using BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS and after tranferring it to SRM I am able to see the new payment term in table BBP_PAYTERM and BBP_PAYTERM_TEXT in SRM system.
But non of the payment terms are not reflecting into PO. We are not getting any errors while processing the PO.
Could you please suggest what may be the issue here.
Best Regards,
Siddappa

Hello Siddappa,
I am a little confused here with the scenario.
I understand that the payment terms are recenly created and replicated. So naturally they would have been updated in the relevant vendor master as well. Now has the vendor master been replicated to SRM from ECC once the payment terms were updated.
So from what you have mentioned "When we check the BBP_PD, the payment term is reflecting for the POs created after shopping cart approval."
So does this mean once the SC is approved then the PO is created and then the Terms of Payment are seen in the PO.
However "If the PO created through describe requirement, the Vendor will not assigned the PO created will go to Held status and buyer will process the order."
So does this mean since the Vendor is not mentioned the Terms of Payment is not being reflected and will happen only once the same is specified in the PO.
I have a question on whether after replicating the Payment Terms, has it been seen in any of the PO's created so far or it is always blank.
Regards
Pramod

Baseline date & Payment terms are not populating for Intercomany vendor

Hi,
When we post intercompany invoice & check the vendor line items in FBL1N,it is expected to have data payment terms & Baseline date from the posted Invoice.this is occuring fime with single company but this data is blank for Intercompany which is creating issues for further steps.
Anybody has faced such issue? What may be the resolution?

Hello,
Why are you directly executing these programs?
You will not expect these program to execute directly by going to SE38.
I would have configured the relevant payment methods in the country with DME structure or classical RFFO* programs, which in turn pick up the inherent programs at the time of running F110.
For example, if you need to generate BACS file for country GB, either you copy the GB_BACS to ZGB_BACS or use GB_BACS directly in FBZP settings.
Make sure that you have maintained OBPM1 / OBPM2 / OBPM3 and OBPM4 settings properly.
The system automatically gives the access to system RFFOAVIS_FPAYM. Prepare a variant against this program in F110. Relevant file gets generated to folder path mentioned in OBPM4 will get generated. The file get generated can be seen in AL11.
Hope this is informative and solves your issue.
Regards,
Ravi

Line item text field from MIGO are not copied into FI line item text field

Hi all on SCN, please, I need a help.
It was created as required by the user a field status group with the text field required.
This field status group was assigned to some accounts, in order to make my unit tests.
u2003
In development envirionment was made some tests directly in FI area, and it works properly.
u2003
But the user made a test using MIGO transaction, choosing in this transaction an account that he changed its field status variant to the one created in development environment, that make the text fiels required. So, to start, he donu2019t fill the text item of MIGO, and a message error appear stating that he needs to enter values in this field.
After fill in the text fiels, he can save his work.
u2003
But the FI document generated donu2019t receive the line item text typed in MIGO, but receives the values on Reference document and Document Header text entered in the header of MIGO, what is missing, donu2019t is automatically copied MIGO text line items to FI documents line Items, does there is some additional configuration missing?
Hope someone help me with this issues.
Thanks in advanced!

Hi,
Material document will get updated in reference field in FI by default. If for any reason, want to get this updated in text field, you need to define a subsititution in GGB1.
Best Regards,
Madhu

How to synchronise calenders. Appointments from the iphone are not copied into Outlook 2010

has anyone been successful in synchronising the calenders between the Iphone and Outlook 2010? Appointments written into my iphone do not appear in the Outlook calender. I did try "via the Google"calender, but no luck that way either..
It would make life easier ...

See if this article helps: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook-help/synchronize-outlook-and-apple-iph one-or-ipod-touch-calendars-HA010266829.aspx

Payment term is not being pickedup in cross company code transaction

Dear Friends,
In one of the cross company code transaction scenarios (MIRO), We post a invoice in HQ books to bill on outside vendor. In subsidiary books one more cross company code document will get generated automatically, as billing on HQ as a vendor. In that second document, payment term is not being pickedup.
eg., A is HQ and B is subsidiary company
I post invoice in A books as B account debit and outside vendor credit.
In B books one more entry will get generated automatically as GRIR account debit and A (defined as vendor in B books) account credit.
In B Books payment terms are maintained in vendor master record (A vendor).
But still the payment terms are not being pickedup in that document. Because of this, it is taking the document date itself as net due date.
Please suggest, how to proceed to pick some payment term in that document.
Regards
Suresh

Hi
Assign the payment terms in Purchase Organisation level in Vendor Master Record.
Regards
Shammi

Sub Line itmes are not copied out...

Hi all,
I am using BAPI ''BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2'' to create a sales order with refernce to Contract number. The creation of sales order is fine but the issue is when ever there are sub line items in the contract there are not copied into salesr order.
Is any one know the reason and solution to reslove this issue.
My code:
DATA: lv_vbap TYPE vbap.
data: lv_inst_id(8) type n.
wa_contract_header_in-refobjtype = gc_bus2032.
wa_contract_header_in-refdoc_cat = 'G'.
wa_contract_header_in-ref_doc    = wa_vbak-vbeln.
wa_contract_header_in-refdoctype = wa_vbak-auart.
wa_contract_header_in-doc_type   = gc_auart.
wa_contract_header_in-sales_org = wa_vbak-vkorg.
wa_contract_header_in-distr_chan = wa_vbak-vtweg.
wa_contract_header_in-division   = wa_vbak-spart.
Header data check list
wa_contract_header_inx-updateflag = gc_var_i.
wa_contract_header_inx-refdoc_cat = gc_var_x.
wa_contract_header_inx-ref_doc    = gc_var_x.
wa_contract_header_inx-doc_type   = gc_var_x.
wa_contract_header_inx-sales_org = gc_var_x.
wa_contract_header_inx-distr_chan = gc_var_x.
wa_contract_header_inx-division   = gc_var_x.
Fill Item details table
LOOP AT t_vbap_copy INTO wa_vbap.
      wa_contract_items_in-itm_number   = wa_vbap-posnr.
      wa_contract_items_in-material     = wa_vbap-matnr.
      wa_contract_items_in-target_qty   = wa_vbap-kwmeng.
      wa_contract_items_in-target_val   = wa_vbap-netwr.
      wa_contract_items_in-refobjtype   = gc_bus2032.
      wa_contract_items_in-ref_doc      = wa_vbap-vbeln.
      wa_contract_items_in-ref_doc_it   = wa_vbap-posnr.
      wa_contract_items_in-ref_doc_ca   = 'G'.
     wa_contract_items_in-PO_ITM_NO    = wa_vbap-posnr.
     wa_contract_items_in-config_id    = '000001'.
     wa_contract_items_in-inst_id      = '00000001'.
      APPEND wa_contract_items_in TO t_contract_items_in.
Fill item update table
      wa_contract_items_inx-itm_number = wa_vbap-posnr.
      wa_contract_items_inx-material    = gc_var_x.
      wa_contract_items_inx-target_qty = gc_var_x.
      wa_contract_items_inx-target_val = gc_var_x.
      wa_contract_items_inx-refobjtype = gc_var_x.
      wa_contract_items_inx-ref_doc     = gc_var_x.
      wa_contract_items_inx-ref_doc_it = gc_var_x.
      wa_contract_items_inx-ref_doc_ca = gc_var_x.
     wa_contract_items_inx-PO_ITM_NO   = gc_var_x.
     wa_contract_items_inx-config_id   = gc_var_x.
     wa_contract_items_inx-inst_id     = gc_var_x.
      APPEND wa_contract_items_inx TO t_contract_items_inx.
    Schedule Lines
      wa_contract_schedules_in-itm_number = wa_vbap-posnr.
      wa_contract_schedules_in-sched_line = sy-tabix.
      wa_contract_schedules_in-req_qty    = wa_vbap-kwmeng.
      append wa_contract_schedules_in to t_contract_schedules_in.
      wa_contract_schedules_inx-itm_number = wa_vbap-posnr.
      wa_contract_schedules_inx-sched_line = sy-tabix.
      wa_contract_schedules_inx-updateflag = 'X'.
      wa_contract_schedules_inx-req_qty    = wa_vbap-kwmeng.
      append wa_contract_schedules_inx to t_contract_schedules_inx.
    Configuration
      wa_contract_CFGS_REF-posex        = wa_vbap-posnr.
      wa_contract_CFGS_REF-CONFIG_ID    = '000001'.
      wa_contract_cfgs_ref-ROOT_ID      = '00000001'.
      wa_contract_cfgs_ref-sce          = '1'.
      wa_contract_cfgs_ref-kbname       = wa_vbap-matnr.
      wa_contract_cfgs_ref-kbversion    = '001'.
      append wa_contract_cfgs_ref to t_contract_cfgs_ref.
      wa_contract_CFGS_inst-config_id   = '000001'.
      wa_contract_cfgs_inst-inst_id     = '00000001'.
      wa_contract_cfgs_inst-OBJ_TYPE    = 'MARA'.
      wa_contract_cfgs_inst-class_type = 300.
      wa_contract_cfgs_inst-obj_key     = wa_vbap-matnr.
      append wa_contract_cfgs_inst to t_contract_cfgs_inst.
    lv_inst_id = '00000001'.
    loop at t_vbap into lv_vbap where uepos = wa_vbap-posnr.
      add 1 to lv_inst_id.
      wa_contract_CFGS_inst-config_id   = '000001'.
      wa_contract_cfgs_inst-inst_id     = lv_inst_id.
      wa_contract_cfgs_inst-OBJ_TYPE    = 'MARA'.
      wa_contract_cfgs_inst-CLASS_TYPE = 300.
      wa_contract_cfgs_inst-obj_key     = lv_vbap-matnr.
      append wa_contract_cfgs_inst to t_contract_cfgs_inst.
      wa_contract_cfgs_part_of-config_id = '000001'.
      wa_contract_cfgs_part_of-parent_id = '00000001'.
      wa_contract_cfgs_part_of-inst_id   = lv_inst_id.
      wa_contract_cfgs_part_of-part_of_no = wa_vbap-posnr.
      wa_contract_cfgs_part_of-obj_type = 'MARA'.
      wa_contract_cfgs_part_of-CLASS_TYPE = 300.
      wa_contract_cfgs_part_of-obj_key   = lv_vbap-matnr.
      append wa_contract_cfgs_part_of to t_contract_cfgs_part_of.
    endloop.
    loop at t_zgd_v_vc_char into wa_zgd_v_vc_char
                           where instance = wa_vbap-cuobj.
      wa_contract_cfgs_value-config_id = '000001'.
      wa_contract_cfgs_value-inst_id    = '00000001'.
      wa_contract_cfgs_value-CHARC      = wa_zgd_v_vc_char-atnam.
      wa_contract_cfgs_value-value      = wa_zgd_v_vc_char-atwrt.
      append wa_contract_cfgs_value to t_contract_cfgs_value.
    ENDLOOP.
ENDLOOP.
Fill Partner Table
wa_contract_partners-partn_role    = gc_sp.
wa_contract_partners-partn_numb    = wa_vbak-kunnr.
APPEND wa_contract_partners TO t_contract_partners.
Call Bapi to create sales order
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2'
    EXPORTING
      order_header_in     = wa_contract_header_in
      order_header_inx    = wa_contract_header_inx
    IMPORTING
      salesdocument       = gv_sales_doc
    TABLES
      return              = t_return
      order_items_in      = t_contract_items_in
      order_items_inx     = t_contract_items_inx
      order_partners      = t_contract_partners
      ORDER_SCHEDULES_IN = t_contract_schedules_in
      ORDER_SCHEDULES_INX = t_contract_schedules_inx
      ORDER_CFGS_REF      = t_contract_cfgs_ref
      ORDER_CFGS_INST     = t_contract_cfgs_inst
      ORDER_CFGS_PART_OF = t_contract_cfgs_part_of
      ORDER_CFGS_VALUE    = t_contract_cfgs_value.
Thanks in advance...
Satya.

Hi,
Material document will get updated in reference field in FI by default. If for any reason, want to get this updated in text field, you need to define a subsititution in GGB1.
Best Regards,
Madhu

Non-image files are not copied to the Backup Location

I'm on Aperture 3.0.3... I just noticed that non-image files (e.g., WAV files) are not copied into the Backup Location, although they are copied into the main folder location during an import. Does anyone else see this behavior?

Shawnsat,
Yes you can still stream from the host computer, the knowledge base article that describes this is http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305098. If you are attempting to display Photos on Apple TV, they must be synced to the Apple TV, per knowledge base article http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305139.
Cheers,
John

Payment term issue "error payment term is not defined"

I have created a new payment term, and incorporated in customer master and created sales order . payment term is getting populated in sales order with an error "payment term is not defined". Please help to resolve.'
David

There can be many possibilities for this error, in tcode OBB8,
- the terms of payment is not marked for customer.
- date limits are not mention properly.
- if the installments are not config properly
Or
Try it putting manually in to the sales doc.
If problem persists, take assistance of FI team member to sort out the error.
Also, refer following SAP Notes:
- 66529 F5839 Payment term & not defined
- 598025 Work method terms of payment for condition records
- 1180397 enterprise SOA conversion/Supplement to Note 117317
- 311514 No payment method for installment terms of payment
- 649567      EDI: incorrect baseline date for payment
- 208023      Posting bill doc ->FI:incor cash discount rate used
- 391939      Entries ignored with warning messages in sales document
Thanks & Regards
JP

Payment terms can not be loaded to crm from ECC

dear expert,
i have added three new payment terms in ECC and i need to load them to CRM. I tried intial load object DNL_CUST_Price, and also tried request load. When i monitored the object/request, there is a green light. however, when i go to IMG in CRM. the new payment terms is not loaded.
i also checked ogject
Can anyone tell me the possible reason? where can i check and do trouble shooting?
Thanks!
BR
Hedy

Hi Hedy,
Please see note 1420329 which should help you to download the payment terms. Check your SMOFPARSFA settings as per the note as it is not supported to mix the two table combinations TVZB/TVZBT and T052/T052U. Also make sure that the request load you have configured uses request detail depending on which table combination above that you use.
I hope this helps.
Kind regards,
Vanessa

Payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below. It appears on F110 when I try to pay a vendor open item with extended withholding tax:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome

The payment method "Y" the option "payment order only" was marked?
For a withholding tax type with accumulation in a company code with extended withholding tax payment
methods that create only payment orders can´t be used. Payment orders can only be created only if there are
no tax types with accumulation involved in the paid items of the payment run.
The functionality extended withholding tax works fine for Brazil
however, you can´t use the payment order with this functionality.
Please, review your customizing for payment method 'Y" in transaction
FBZP.
Best regards,
Leonardo Vedovelli
FI Support Engineer
SAP Active Global Support

Customer receipts and payments are not flowing into PS module

Dear Team,
I am new to the PS module..... Customer receipts and payments are not flowing into PS module. Kindly let me know the missing configuration steps.
Thanks !!!

Sagar Kapadia wrote:
> 1) What is the pre-requisite configuration for activation of Commitments and Project Cash management in the PS system?
> 2) Is there any word of caution which needs to be kept in mind at the time of activation?
> 3) once activated, what will the impact on the data? Are there any chances of data inconsistency?
>
Only one pre-requisite is the creation of FM area.
As I suggested earlier, please read SAP help which will answer all your queries.
Please follow the below path...
SAP Help Portal >>> SAP ERP Central Component >>> Financials >>> Project System >>> Payments >>> Project Cash Management.

Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome !
TREAD LOCKED SINCE IT IS DUPLICATED FROM THREAD payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi,
On the analysis, the system expects an entry in the T059Q table with
code as XX.
The reason being in the extended withholding tax we use multiple
witholding tax codes and these entries are stored in the table
with_item. And in BSEG we populate the field withholding tax code i.e.
BSEG-QSSKZ with the value 'XX'. In classical withholding tax we used to
store the code directly which is not possible with Extended withholding
tax.
As the field BSEG-QSSKZ refers to the values in the table T059Q-QSSKZ
the entry 'XX" needed in this table for the corresponding country of the
company code to maintain the correct relationship and consistent
database information.
Hence for the statistical purpose and for the internal calculations we
need an entry in the table T059Q. Could you please maintain this code
i.e. 'XX' also in the table T059Q in a test system? Then retest your issue.
This should resolve your issue.
Kind Regards,
Vanessa.

Material delta changes are not flowing into CRM

Dear All,
material delta changes are not flowing into CRM, because the product hierarchy on material has been changed to a new product hierarchy. I do not want to download again the object DNL_CUST_PROD1 because it maight cause inconstancies in CRM. (I have already defined some z product hierarchies in CRM)
Do I need to create the new product hierarchy also in CRM manually?
Appreciate any inputs
Raj

Hi Raj,
Use the transacrion R3AR2 to create a z object for DNL_CUST_PROD1 and assign DNL_CUST_PROD1 as the object name
Then in request detail screen for new z object enter the details like table name (T179 in your case) and the name of the product hierarchy that you want to bring in. Save the transaction
Then use the transaction R3AR4 to initiate the download for your new z object as you normally do in R3AS.
Then go to SMW01 and reprosess the struck Bdoc.
Reward points if helps,
Regards,
Paul Kondaveeti

You are not authorized to call up line item display (FB03)

Hi,
actually; I am facing a problem; one user is getting error message "You are not authorized to call up line item display" when he is trying to view the payment usage of document no in FB03 transaction code.
I have checked and found that user is already having display access for the company code which he is putting under company code field.
Also as per the SU53 screen shot; it is showing
Authorization check failed for S_CTS_ADMI
Field - CTS_ADMFCT
for - TABL
I have not run the trace yet..
Kindly advice on what could be the problem and solution for that...
Many thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Anuj

> Also as per the SU53 screen shot; it is showing
>
> Authorization check failed for S_CTS_ADMI
> Field - CTS_ADMFCT
> for - TABL
Total Questions: 8 (6 unresolved)
Good match!

Contract details i.e currency, Payment term are not copied into Call-off

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for