Control on PO creation

Dear all,
Our client have requirement that is, system should not allow to create a PO if any open PO's exist for a particular material.
Is there any settings can fullfill this requirement. Please provide solution.
Thanks & regards
Madhu

Hello,
As per SAP stand there is such control stilll you can carryout this validatuion by using below Badi.
You may make use of function exit EXIT_SAPMM06E_013 to carry out this validation. Please make sure undeleted (LOEKZ = space), non-return (RETPO = space) and non-delivery completed (ELIKZ = space) PO lines from EKPO for validation.
Regards

Similar Messages

  • Define Control for Automatic Creation of Pick HUs

    We are using full blown HU management and in the customizing for the Control for Automatic Creation of Pick HU's you define the packaging materials to use.  The help in from of this customizing says that if this is blank the system attempts to find a common packaging material for all materials in the transfer order. 
    My issue is that when I leave this blank the packaging material that the system proposes is not the packaging material that is contained on the source HU nor is it the packaging material that is contained in the Packing Instructions.
    How does the system determine the packaging material on the destination HU?  Am I required to maintain a value in this customizing?
    Thanks
    Nick

    I found my own answer so i will give myself many points.  See question to get answer.

  • How to control change request creation for particular IBase Component?

    Dear Experts,
    Can anybody suggest , how to control change request creation for particular IBase Component?
    We have implemented ChaRM which is integrated with SAP ECC & SAP BI.
    ChaRM is not integrated with SAP Solution Manager.
    End Users are creating support notifications from -Help Menu- Create Support Notification.
    The IBase Component is not editable once notification is created. This Ibase is copied to change request when the action-create change document is saved.
    Requirement is that, during creation of change document, system should check the IBase component of support notification. If the IBase is related to solution manager system, system should restirct the change request creation.
    Kindly suggest how to achieve this.
    Regards
    Vivek

    Hello Vivek,
    The way to do what you want is to create a schedule condition for action Create Change Document. The action has to be displayed only when the IBase/Component value differs from SolMan. To add the IBase/Component value to the container so that it can be evaluated during runtime, you will have to create a subtype of BUS2000116 on which condition can be buit.
    See the following posts for more information :
    Hope this helps,
    BR.
    Stéphane.

  • Error in installing Database Control with Database Creation Assistant

    I'm trying to install the Database Control on Win2003 with the Database Creation Assistant. I get the following error. D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\ECOMDB\pfile\init.ora (The system cannot find the path specified).
    Our init.ora file is not in that path and our file is named initECOMDB.ora. How do I tell DBCA the correct path and file name to use?
    By the way I'm a unix guy and this is the first time I've done Oracle on Windows. The database had been created by someone else and the files are sort of slung all over the place.
    Replies appreciated.
    Kirk

    Open initECOMDB.ora, it may be calling D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\admin\ECOMDB\pfile\init.ora which does not exist. Change it to the correct directory or remove it if all the required parameters are already in initECOMDB.ora. The line to look for is ifile
    BTW - if your database has already been created, you can create its database control from the command line:
    emca -config dbcontrol db -repos create

  • Manual Staging in control cycle TR creation WM/PP integration

    Hi,
    We defined Material Staging Indicator as 4 in Control Cycle
    How do we trigger TR for this materials ly??? Do we need to create TR manually? OR any transaction which will allow to create TR automatically for desired quantities
    When i go to Change production Order and WM pick list Requested quantiry/confirmed Quantory is Blank only requirement qty column has values
    How i can enter quantities manually and trigger TR
    Can i have in Prduction Order few materials manually staged and few option 1 [pick parts]

    Let me rephrase
    We are using Standard PP/WM integration to stage materials from warehouse to production Bins.
    We defined Material Staging Indicator as 4 [Manual Staging] in Control Cycle of materials [as business wishes to move materials manually from warehouse to production Bins]
    How do we trigger Transfer requests[TR] creation to initiate movement of raw materials from warehouse to Production bins.
    Do we need to create TRu2019s manually? If yes How [As I understand TR doesnu2019t allow to move more than one material at a time from one Bin to another]
    When i go to Change production Order and select WM pick list I could see Requested quantity and confirmed Quantity column are not getting filled only requirement qty column has values. All columns are grayed.
    Can we have few materials manually staged and few via Staging indicator option 1 pick parts?  so that all critical parts will be moved manually and others SAP to create TRu2019s automatically
    PLEASE HELP

  • Authorization control of PR creation from maintenance order

    Hi,
    I want to control creation of PR through maintenance order (Service as well as material PR) for only some users with the use of authorization object control.PR should not be created for this users.
    Can anyone suggest me which authorization object I have to control to acheive the expected result.
    Regards,
    Yogesh

    Thanks Yawar,
    Your solution is perfectly works for me. Earlier solutions are also useful the things is you have to first activate the authorization object through SE24,that means change the Check indicator from N (Not checked ) to C (Check )or CN(Check & maintain)
    Regards,
    Yogesh

  • Better control over the creation of thumbnails

    While i have nothing against the current method of generating thumbnails with ADDT, I feel we need better controls as to how our thumbnails are created. By all means, the current option of generating thumbnails on the fly can remain, but I feel we need a tab on the image upload behaviour that allows us the developers to determine how our thumbnails are created.
    This will mainly happen during the image upload process. For example, in order to get uniform thumbnails, a developer could decide that he wants to crop his thumbnails to a certain size so that they can look good in a gallery. This i feel will come in pretty handy for those who are using Spry to create a photo gallery. At the moment, the one way you can create thumbnails on upload is to create a custom trigger and enter the required code to be executed after the file has been uploaded.
    So this feature will be welcomed i feel by many who are not too happy with the current method of generating thumbnails.

    I agree.
    Well said Emmanuel since the ADDT thumbnails are only created when requested by the display thumbnail server behavior. So some additional flexibility would be welcome. For example, when you do not wish to use the server behavior. Till then, we just have to use a custom trigger and to some ADDT users, thats advanced stuff.
    Cheers.

  • Control Block - Preventing creation of new record

    hi,
    i have a control block with two text fields. i do not want new record created for this block when the down key is pressed.
    How do i do that ?

    Re: data disappears when pressing down arrow key

  • Duplicate control label preventing creation of unit test using UTF

    Hello Everyone,
                       I was trying to create a unit test for a VI using the unit test framework (evaluation version) to try out this tool.  I have two questions regarding that.
    1. Several sub-VIs are called by this VI. I wanted to create a unit test for each of these sub-VIs so that I could test each of them separately. But UTF provided me with the option to create a unit test for the main VI alone. The main VI is huge and getting 100% code coverage is going to be a challenging task. Is there a way by which I can create unit tests for the individual sub-VIs?
    2. When I tried to create the unit test for the main VI, I got an error saying: Cannot create a test from this VI. Contains the following duplicate control labels. This is because the same indicators are being used in different cases within a case structure.
    Is there anyway to resolve this issue?
    Thanks

    If I understand what the problem is you have to controls or indicators that have the same name. To fix this you need to give them unique names. If they need to say the same thing on the user interface then you can use the caption and change the name on that so they both have the same name.
    Tim
    Johnson Controls
    Holland Michigan

  • Control cycle mass creation with staging indicator 4

    Hi All,
    Is there any way to create control cycles in mass for staging indicator other than 3 - rel order parts?

    You can define a generic control cycle for manual staging parts and it will be valid for parts w/o control cycle. Please read SAP online help:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c6/f841494afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    For manual staging, you can define one control cycle per production supply area for all materials. This control cycle is then valid for all the materials in the production supply area, for which you have not defined an individual control cycle.
    If you want other mass cration / change tool, you have to develop it on your own.
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Dec 13, 2011 9:59 PM

  • Pricing and margin control on condition creation

    Dear champions,
    I would like to create a condition type PR00 that should be controled by cost price and all the discounts performed for a material.
    i mean it shouldn't be possible to create a PR00 condition if I am under cost price considering also discounts.
    Is it possible to make it ?
    Edited by: Michel SALLET on Jun 30, 2008 7:11 PM

    Hi,
    You can try it by giving the order type in the production scheduler profile in T-Code OPKP (At the bottom of the page). When you will convert the planned order, the system will pick the order type from OPKP.
    If you are creating a production order manually, you can grey out the Order Type field at the initial screen by creating a transaction variant in SHD0.
    Check & revert.
    Rohit.
    Edited by: Rohit Chauhan on Feb 6, 2009 10:55 AM

  • Controlling iTunes folder creations

    I have recently installed iTunes onto my computer running Windows XP Home. I have a few .wma files that I have been converting to .mp3 files (successfully). I do not understand how to keep iTunes from creating folders for artists that did a song with another artist. Call me a control freak! I think that by switching off the option to have iTunes manage the folder where I have my music files stored should have taken care of this problem, but that is not so and it is taking me an extremely long time moving the files back to the correct folder. Upon doing this, I found out that iTunes does not recognize the files that I have moved (into the folder where they were stored before iTunes moved them) and is asking me to locate them. Upon showing iTunes where the file(s) is/are, my only option is to Open the file.
    My questions are:
    1) How do I keep iTunes from creating new folders?
    2) How do I show iTunes where the files are that I had to move back without running in circles?
    Thanks for any help.

    up2somethin -
    This is the "Feedback about New Discussions" forum. You should ask your question in iTunes for Windows. I think you'll find more people knowledgable about that version of iTunes there.

  • Customer inf record control inspection lot creation

    Hi all,
    There is this section in SAP that said:
    Using customer Info record for a customer/material combination, you can specify whether or not an inspection lot is created before the goods are shipped or after the goods are shipped
    The u201Cbefore the goods are shippedu201D u2026 does it means an inspection lot is created AFTER a Delivery Order is created in SD component and BEFORE a Goods Issue?
    Likewise, the u201Cafter the goods are shippedu201D, does it means an inspection lot is created AFTER a Delivery Order AND Goods Issue have taken place?
    Thanks,
    YY

    Dear Yong
    Using Customer info record you can do delivery inspeciton at any one of the 3 stages
    1) Before delivery - Delivery inspection has to be completed for doing the PGI of the delivery document. In this inspection lot is created when Delivery document is saved. PGI is not allowed before the clearance of the lot
    2) After delivery - This is after PGI is taken place then the inspection lot is created
    3) at customer site - this is when the material reaches the customer
    Option 1 has a better control on the system than the option 2 & 3
    Regards
    Gajesh

  • Control on the Creation of Inspection lot

    Hi all,
    In my requirement, we have a material which is subcontracted and in the process, we will have some rejection. Hence the rejected material will be received in to the system with an account assignment category (cost centre). For both the line items in the PO, the inspection lot will get triggered, but the requirement is that the lot should not be generated for the rejected material.
    thanks & regards
    Chaitanya Rayaprolu

    Hi Chaitanya,
    Well, I observe a functional loophole here.
    1.     As you mention, you inward rejected material against cost center, it means you must be using account assignment category K  in PO.
    2.     My question is, if the material is rejected, why you are inwarding it against cost center as it consumes the value on your account and not on vendoru2019s account.
    3.     Ideally it should be debited on vendoru2019s account if its vendoru2019s fault.
    4.     The practice should be, inward all the material irrespective of rejection. Reject the material through 122 movement and proceed for payment for the acceptable quantity.
    Letu2019s talk about your scenario where you donu2019t want inspection lot generation
    1.     Whenever you inward the material with account assignment category as K the stock gets consumed at the same moment and you observe no rise in stock level.
    2.     But if you have activated inspection type 01 in material master, system creates inspection lot for this movement.
    3.     Kindly note this inspection lot is stock irrelevant.
    4.     That means you need not do stock posting. Only UD is sufficient as the lot doesnu2019t contain any stock.
    5.     Albeit you donu2019t want system to generate lot, you may explore user exit QPL10001 and write your own logic that whenever account assignment category is K do not create inspection lot.
    Regards,
    Anand Rao
    Edited by: Anand Rao on May 9, 2011 2:47 PM

  • Control List Item creation/edit with SharePoint Groups

    I have a SharePoint Site that holds two SharePoint Groups Clerks and
    Accountants
    I have a List Called Customer
    This list contains columns Name, Surname, Balance.
    Clerks
    Create Customer and can fill the form except Balance field
    Edit customer fields Name and surname but not Balance.
    Accountants
    Can only Edit Balance and Surname.
    NB I do not mind a different solution to this as this is just a scenario I invented to understand how to do things. Nonetheless, I am after no code OOTB solutions and the target is to make things efficient for the users.

    Hi.
    SharePoint does not support Field level security.
    There are some custom solutions (e.g. https://sppex.codeplex.com/) that allow to you to use this functionality.
    If you perform a bing search using the key sharepoint field level security you can find some free or commercial solution to solve this issue.
    Regards,
    Bubu
    http://zsvipullo.blogspot.it
    Please mark my answer if it helped you, I would greatly appreciate it.

Maybe you are looking for