COPA KE30 Summarrization Levels
I have read up on Summarrization Levels and am considering using them. But my users require drilling down into COPA reports and creating report using characteristics as selection criteria. Will these issues affect my option to use Summarrization Levels?
>>If you drilldown to line items then summ levels won't help; they are useful for reading segment level data.
I have both requirements:
1. some reports are actuals YTD compared with last year.
2. some reports are by salesman who require drilling down to specific invoice.
What I'm not understanding is the affect on summarization levels on the type of report in item 2 above. If I build summarization levels, would I be able to run these drill down reports?
Gary
Similar Messages
-
Hi Friends,
How to maintain planned values in COPA - KE30 Report ?
Awaiting your suggestions.
SriniThank you for your mail but how ? when generate the KE30 report it is displaying the sales values but not Cost and Revenue.
Could you please advise ?
Awaiting your reply.
Thanks & Regards
Srini -
How to link summarization level to COPA- KE30 (T CODE) report ?
Hi,
I have created a report (t code KE30) and want to utilise one of the exixting summarization level. When i run the report it reads data from segment level. What settings are needed such that when i run the report it should read data from summarization level and not from segment level? pl advice
BR,
AbhishekHi
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/COPAPerformanceImprovementusingSummarization+Levels
Regards -
Creating Tcode for COPA(KE30) report
Hi ,
i need to create Tcode for KE30 report
through SE93 i tried with option transaction with parameters here i need to give Ke30 report name
for ex :GP4BW2S4QUBUNA68Y2YXMIW8V6X
but program name last 3 letters will change in production system
how to create T-code with out effecting in other system
Thnaks,
kamalakarHi,
Try to create custom t-code for KE30report using transaction with Variant.
go to t-code SHD0 and create a transaction variant for the t-code KE30..
and next go to se93> select transaction with Variant> enter transaction and transaction variant and
-->save and activate..
Prabhudas -
Hi All,
I have created summarization levels in COPA and when I run the COPA KE30 report with the summarization levels being active or inactive, it produces the same numbers in the Dev system, so no issue there. But in QA system, same summarization levels do not provide the same numbers. The numbers when summarization levels are activated are less than half of the numbers when summarization levels are deactivated. Same problem in the PRD system. I have tried to resolve the issue by creating the summarization levels directly in the PRD system.But the numbers did not match in that case either. The numbers provided by the report when the summarization levels are deactived are less than even half of the numbers when the summarization levels are activated.
I have checked the report parameters in the DEV, QA and PRD systems and they are same.
Please let me know what may be causing this inconsistency.
Can it be because of some basis problem? I mean some memory problem etc which may be causing the summarization tables not to have all the data in QA and PRD systems.You wouldnt have any message in reports yaar.
Just compare the authorisations in the development system with others.
Also, do one thing., execute transaction SU53 immediately after the report execution, to see for any missing authorisations. -
Dear Experts,
As per my knowledge we can generate the KE30 Report by Period and Year leve. But my client requires to generate the COPA KE30 Report by date-wise. I had checked the all characteristics, I didn't found the Date Charactereistic.
How can I acheive this requirement?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Balaji Bhonsle..Hi Balaji,
there are two kinds of reports in KE30: segment-level based reports and line-item based reports.
Posting date is available only in line-item based reports.
Line-item based reports are created in TC KE91, the forms used by them in KE94 (vs. KE31 and KE43 for segment-level reports)
Line-item based reports will run slowly, as they read all individual line-items
regards
Nikolas -
Hi,
I am very unclear about summarization levels in CO-PA. Please can any one explain me what is the real significance of summarization level, why do we need it and steps to configure it, and on what logic is data extracted from it.
Thank you,
Sam1. What is use of summarizattion in COPA?
summarization level in Profitability Analysis (CO-PA):
A summarization level is a tool for improving performance.
Summarization levels store an original dataset in summarized form. This gives quick access to presummarized data for functions that do not need detailed information, and means that the data does not need to be summarized separately each time.
you can check this in this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ae/bd116e940f11d2b63c0000e82debc6/frameset.htm
2. If we dont give summarization in COPA Account based will records be available in RSA3 - yes
2. How to create summarization level for a datasource?
You can do this in Transaction - KCDU/KCDV or SPRO
Hope it helps.
Regards -
Cost of sales flow in COPA and its detailed breakdown cost component f
Hi ,
we have a requirement that we need details about what makes cost of sales numbers in COPA.
i know the our VPRS value is flowing into COPA as COGS but now we want that we should have ite detailed breakdown as per cost components.
can you please tell me detailed configuration steps to make this happen so that we can create a new COPA ke30 report which gives us the breakdown of the COGS numbers.
one more requirement is that for purchase parts our client is maintaing price PB00 condition and some other conditions like brokerage, freight etc in the info record for those materials and they want that all these conditions value should add up to show the COGS value for these purchase parts in the COPA report.. how do we do that?
please reply soon...
Thanks in advance,
GurjitHi Balaji
Which cost elements are you talking about? You can directly make FI postings to COPA in F-02 by clicking on "Prf Seg"
Note that a cost element will either be posted to COPA or Cost Center or Internal order or WBS element... Real posting happens only to one of these...
Out of these, some Cost Centers merge into COGM/COGS i.e. Std cost and this is reflected as COGS.... The variance is posted as variance in COPA
Some cost centers like Marketing which do not form part of COGM/COGS, can be allocated from CO to COPA using KEU5...
This is how the values flow to COPA
Regards
Ajay M -
Transfer of Costs in Product Cost Collector to COPA
Dear Experts,
Please can you advise me on this current issue I'm having. Below is a description of problem:
Customer is currently using report designed in COPA (KE30) to derive P&L report for using Plant as a characteristic.
This was being done at a time when Product Costing functionality was not being used
All costs (administrative, sales and production costs) were being collected in cost centers
At end of month assessment of cost center values to COPA is executed (KEU5)
Customer is then able to derive P&L report per Plant characteristic
However with implementation of Product Costing, all Production related costs are captured in Product Cost Collectors and not Cost Center
Hence we have no way of assessing or transferring total production costs from Product Cost Collector to CO-PA
We have tried to configure FI/MM PA transfer structure (KEI1) and default account assignment (OKB9) for automatic transfer of costs on goods receipt/issue, however this is not working because the product cost collector is used as the default account assignment for the transactions
So far only material cost valuation of sales/billed materials are possible (which does not address concern)
As a result we have a gap and customer is unable to derive P&L by Plant from CO-PA.
Can you advise if there is a way out, in order to have all Production Cost transferred to CO-PA.
Thanks,
Ola.Hi Ola
Your Cost centers would be categorized as below
1. MFG Cost Centers (In Plant)
2. Service Cost Centers (In Plant)
3. Few Cost centers (outside plant) Eg: Sales, Marketing, Sales offices etc
At period end
1. Allocate the Costs from SER CC to MFG CC using Distribution / Assessment cycle.
This will make SER CC as zero
2. Calculate actual activity price in MFG CC (KSS2 / KSII)
3. After this, do revaluation of PCC using CON2.. This will make balance in MFG CC as zero
4. Allow the Variances to be updated to COPA by ticking the "Variances to Costing based COPA" in your settlement profile
5. In short, what remains for you to allocate to COPA is the 3rd category of CC.. i.e. you should allocate those CC to COPA whose cost is not included in the cost of product using COPC module
Br. Ajay M -
Actual Values for the Cost Components in COPA - TC - KE4R
Hi,
In TC: KE4R, we are maintaining the value field for each Cost Components from the Cost Components Structure.
And the Point of Valuation is 01.
My understanding is that, when we use this value fields in the COPA report, it will show the value of the standard cost estimate from the cost component structure and not the actual cost that has incurred during the transaction.
Am I correct? If not please correct me.
If yes, then How can I get the actual cost for these cost component structure in the value fields.
Please help.
Thanks and regards
KamiHi Ajay,
we have a requirement that we need details about what makes cost of sales numbers in COPA.
i know the our VPRS value is flowing into COPA as COGS but now we want that we should have ite detailed breakdown as per cost components.
can you please tell me detailed configuration steps to make this happen so that we can create a new COPA ke30 report which gives us the breakdown of the COGS numbers.
one more requirement is that for purchase parts our client is maintaing price PB00 condition and some other conditions like brokerage, freight etc in the info record for those materials and they want that all these conditions value should add up to show the COGS value for these purchase parts in the COPA report.. how do we do that?
please reply soon...
Thanks in advance,
Gurjit -
Product description in COPA reports
Hi All,
Have a material M123 -->Machine tools.but in KE30 reports,i can see only product/material M123,no description.
How can i get Product description in COPA KE30 reports?
Any help is appreciated....
Thanks,
AnushaHi,
After executing the report
choose > 'Settings > Characteristic display' from the menu.
A dialog box appears where you can choose the option.
Change the setting to 'key and name' and the text should appear
regards
Waman
Edited by: Waman Shirwaicar on Jun 24, 2011 3:00 PM -
Dear all experts,
My client has split the product hierarchy in COPA into 3 levels.
For example, ProdHier01-1, ProdHier01-2 & ProdHier01-3.
Then they use these values in COPA to further derive the detailed product characteristics.
By looking at the questions posted in SCN, I realized that the naming convention (ProdHier01-1, etc) and setting (create characteristic with reference to MARA-PAPH1/2/3) are the same.
So I assume this is the standard SAP way to create the prod. hierarchy in COPA.
Now my question is,
1) Is it necessary (or standard way) to create 3 COPA characteristics to derive each level from PAPH1/2/3?
2) What is the purpose to create no. of COPA characteristics according to no. of product hierarchy level?
3) Can I just create 1 COPA characteristic and map it to the full length of product hierarchy value?
I can still derive the detailed product characteristics from this 1 COPA characteristic.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
SebastianHello Madhu,
Thanks for your reply.
That is my main question, why do we need to update Prod.Hier1/2/3 in COPA?
Is it the standard SAP way that's why my client just follows?
When I check in the derivation rule, this Prod.Hier1/2/3 is later being used to derive detailed product characteristics where I am able to get it if i map 1 COPA characteristic to full length product hierarchy value.
What is the purpose of splitting them into 3 levels if there is no other functionality of this piece of info in COPA?
Thank you.
Regards,
Sebastian -
Why item category re-determined at delivery level
Hi Gurus
I want to know what is the purpose of redetermining item category at delivery level?First thing to know is that Item Category determination is used only on newly added items and other specific usages like batches, product substitution, etc. It is meant for Deliveries that are not created with reference to a sales order. If you are copying an item from the order and the item category is configured as a Delivery Item category in 0lvp, SAP copies the order item category and does not redetermine it from configuration.
If you are using Product Substitution in the delivery, SAP first copies the higher level item from the Sales Order, then executes Material Determination to bring in the substitution (lower level) items. In this case the higher level item category would be from the order. Redetermined BOMs would follow the same logic as Product substitution.
In short you can redetermine items in delivery when you are using product substitution or add new Items in delivery or using Sales BOMs.
Hope its clear to you now. -
Dear All,
I am getting differences in FSV and COPA - KE30. Even the top-line does not match. I have no unassigned accounts. Can you anyone please let me know.Hi,
KE30 -COPA reports get their value from profitability segment docs...which r created during SD and MM processes. If a direct GL to GL entry is posted then it wont create a profit segment doc.
Now in ur case the FSV and KE30 report r not matching as FSV are reports taking GL totals... and GL totals need nto match with KE30 as there might be some docs with one GL to Gl posting...
Regards,
Kiran -
I have a COPA KE30 report, which uses Form Z01, in KE36, Z01 has one column, "sales revenue" the formula line is X001-X003+X007, the description for X001 is sales, x003 is freight. X007 is promotion. however, when I double click X001, nothing happened, how can I know which field maps to X001 and X003, x007.
how can I see the details of X001,X003,X007? thanks.hello christ fico,
You can seet he formula only at the total or net sales fields on on revenue characterstic field.
thnx
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do I find the option to enable artwork to be displayed on my iPod
When I connect my iPod to itunes, the music when synced does not display any artwork despite the fact that all artwork is present in my itunes library. Where do I locate the feature to alter this and how do I sort this? Thanks.
-
My mission control key does not work with the new Mac update
The key on the keyboard doesnt work, neither does the button on my dock. Any help? P.S. is anyone else having as much trouble as I am with the new update?
-
Default Business Rules at AppSet level
Hi Experts, Once you create a new AppSet by copying AppShell and add a "Consolidation" type application with all business rules, a default "Business Rules Library" is generated at AppSet level along with "Business Rule" within Application. The "Busin
-
My "Java Platform" plugin is listed as insecure and blocked in the main Add-ons window and I am instructed use the plugin check page to update. When I go to the plugin check page it shows the "Java Platform" plugin as already being "up to date". What
-
how can i do with labview program,when i have 20 different values,and 1 want to add it with constant value.and how to get the results?