COPA Profitability document values

I have one (1) price condition mapped to a COPA field VVPND. (Cost-based COPA)
When I create an invoice and look at the generated Profitability document, it populates a different value than the price condition's.
I put a breakpoint on User-Exit ZXKKEU03. In there I can see that VVPND has this wrong value before any of the user exit code executes. For the life of me I can not find where it is getting (calculating) this incorrect value. I can not get any combination of price values to come up with the same value that's assigned to VVPND.
This happens on a material with a certain account assignment group, and I think this is the "switch" causing the issue.
Anyone know an earlier place to breakpoint and debug what is going on? Or any other ideas on COPA config that could be causing this?
FYI: I am an SD person, so please be kind. I have searched this and other documents with no luck
Bill

Interesting. Bascially I have a number of "revenue" ERLOS Price conditions mapped, and a number of "discount" RABAT feilds mapped.
Most of the "revenue" fields do not have the Transfer +/- checked, while all of the "discount" fields do have it checked.
I assumed that this Transfer +/- check box was to be used when a Price condition could be either positive or negative. generally "revenue" Prices are never negative, whereas "discount" prices are normally negative, hence the check on those.
Of course I'm only an SD guy making this assumption, so put me in my place if I have this incorrect !
Bill

Similar Messages

COPA- Billing document transfer

Hi All
When I am creating a sales document , A profitability document is getting created and Gross sales(PR00) and costs(VPRS) are getting transfered to COPA, But when I am creating Billing document, A COPA document is getting created without gross sales value, Value in PR00 is not getting transferred...It is passing only costs(VPRS) to COPA....Am I missing any configuration?
Also
With document types A Sales order and F Billing data I am transferring revenue to COPA twice , Is this a best practice?

You need to configure the Condition types with values fields in TCode KE4I.
Check if you have reset the condition types for Billing types of Billing Document which would stop or zeroise the values that flow to COPA.
It is not duplication of transferring Sales order and Billing Document to COPA, they are meant for two different purposes, Sales order is forecasting your sales and Billing Documents is your actual sales.

No posting in profitability document

Hi
I have created a new sales pricing condition in DV1 and have missed a step somewhere that assigns it so it posts a profitability document and shows up in the CO PA. Here are the steps that I did set up:
DV1K924795 DV1K New Order Reason Licensing
SPRO > Sales & Distro > Sales > Sales Documents > Sales Document Header > Define Order Reasons. New one is #375 Licensing.
DV1K924799 DV1K New Pricing Condition for Licensing Revenue
SPRO > Sales & Distro > Basic Functions > Pricing > Pricing Control > Define Condition Types. New one is ZLIC Licensing Revenue.
DV1K924801 DV1K Add new pricing cond ZLIC to Pricing Procedure ZCHCRE
SPRO > Sales & Distro > Basic Functions > Pricing > Pricing Control > Define and Assign Pricing Procedures > Maintain Pricing Procedures. I added it to ZCHCRE as step 69.
DV1K924803 DV1K Define Account Key ZLC for License Revenue
SPRO > Sales & Distro > Basic Functions > Account Assignment/Costing > Revenue Account Determination > Define and Assign Account Keys.
The new key is ZLC License Revenue.
SPRO > Sales & Distro > Basic Functions > Account Assignment/Costing > Revenue Account Determination > Assign GL Accounts > General. In sales org 1000 & 3500 assigned gl 43099.
DV1K924809 DV1K Assign new Price Cond ZLIC to COPA
SPRO > Controlling > Profitability Analysis > Flows of Actual Values > Transfer of Incoming Sales Orders > Assign Value Fields > Maintain Assignment of SD Conditions to CO-PA Value Fields. I added ZLIC to VVCRE.
I can create a sales order and bill it. It posts to the correct GL but it does not post a profitability document and it does not show up in CO PA when I run report Profitability by Customer out of KE30. Please let me know what I missed and I will add it to my steps in case I ever have to create another.
Regards
kaushal

Hi Prabal da
Welcome to SDN!
If you are talking about consumption postings generated from back flushing from MFBF - Then the CO object is the Prod order or Cost Collector in such cases
Since, CO Object is already found, OKB9 does not work in this
Check your Prod order or Cost collector... The GI postings would already be lying there
If I have not understood your case properly, do let me know
br, Ajay M

COPA - Deriving the values

Hi Friends,
I need to derive the commision from the revenue value field but only in case of one type of order type. So, in case of order type "A", I want commission to be equal to 10% of VVREV. I need that in the profitability document itself and not in a Report from COPA.
Can some one tell me what all will I need for it.
thanks in advance

Hi,
You can carry out some sort of derivation for value fields using cost cheets and condition types (8KEV) in CO-PA itself. You create a condition type which is a percentage of the SD revenue condition type. You then assign this condition type to a value field (KE45). However as standard you have no provision for limiting it based on a characteristic. I am sure you can use substitution for limiting the population of the condition. This will be a bit messy.
If you have the order type in the field catalog, then you can also create a condition table with access based on order type. This will work very well, but usually order type is not a field that is usually in the field catalog.
I would suggest that you get the condition created in SD and limit its population in SD using a routine.
Then you can assign this condition in CO-PA.
Cheers.

COPA - Split of Value from condition type into different value fields

Dear All,
Customer is having several free schemes to customer the same is set up by SD and Cost of free goods is attached to One Z condition type, this flows along with Main product as characteristic. So we have Main product cost in VPRS and Scheme cost in Z Condition and there is possibility of more than one scheme cost flowing in one Z condition for single billing document. Whereas customer request is to see the each scheme cost separately in COPA. Since Value from SD will be flowing through only one condition type , it will be difficult to me to Split this in COPA. We have given a thought of having more than one condition type from SD ( one Z condition for one scheme) but this resolve our issue at hand. If we look at long term whenever customer introduces new Scheme new condition type need to be created and related COPA changes etc, Which doesn't seem to be working out.
Request Experts help in this, thanks in advance for the help.

Hi Santosh
Having a Z cond type for each scheme is preferrable.... This would address the issue with Standard SAP itself...
Reason being, if you dont do that, then you will have to maintain a mapping somewhere in a Z Table where by system would come to know of the ratio between the schemes... This will be more cumbersome to develop and maintain... Still you wanna do that, here is the logic....
Maintain the schemes in a Z Table... Where each scheme will have a scheme ID - The ratio applicable to various schemes and also the relevant value fields of COPA to be updated for each scheme....
Now, add a Custom Field to the Sales Order and while creating the SO this field needs to be updated with the scheme ID(Relevant Exit to make it mandatory MV45AFZZ / ZB).... If Scheme ID is populated, your Billing should read the Split from Z Table using Exit RV60AFZZ and Update COPA using Exit COPA0002
br, Ajay M

COPA Error - Document "1000000062" is not profit-related and thus could not

Dear Experts,
I have an following issue , please send your inputs for the below issue.
Client is using Make to Sale order scenario ( MTO).
At the time of billing, COPA documents are not getting generated. I also checked if the COPA documents can be generated after VA88 (Make to Sale order settlement. But still the COPA Document for Revenue and Discounts is not getting generated.
Below is the error when KE5ST is executed. I have also checked the note 20254, but couldnt fix the issue .
Error Message - Document "1000000062" is not profit-related and thus could not be transferred
Message no. KF755
Diagnosis
Sales document "1000000062" was not transferred to Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) because it is not relevant for the analyses in CO-PA. This can be due to one of the following reasons (among others):
The document type is not profit-related, such as an inquiry
The sales document shows zero for the quantity
The sales document has been denied
The sales document is locked due to credit reasons
Advance thanks
Sanjai

Hi Sanjai,
I'm facing an issue related to Credit Notes without quantity volume. It is right to have Credit Notes without quantity, but we need to capture these amounts in COPA.
When the CN/DN is posted no COPA document is generated and trying to simulate this through KE4ST I've received the message you've outlined above "
Sales document "XXXXXXXX" was not transferred to Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) because it is not relevant for the analyses in CO-PA. This can be due to one of the following reasons (among others):
The document type is not profit-related, such as an inquiry
The sales document shows zero for the quantity
The sales document has been denied
The sales document is locked due to credit reasons
Do you know how we could capture in COPA these documents which have zero for the quantity?
Thanks,
Jorge

Change of profitability document

Hello
Can anybody tell me about it is possible to change a COPA segment in a FI document without reversing/reposting the FI document?
I know it is possible to create a profitability document via KE21N and display a document via KE23, but no KE22...
Best regards
Søren Kirch
LOGSTOR

Hello Johan
Thank you for your reply.
I know that it is possible to update COPA data coming from SD via KE4S, but how to update data coming from FI in the COPA reports, without reversing the FI document and afterwards post it again with correct COPA assignments?
Best regards
Søren Kirch
LOGSTOR

To split the payment document value as per the line items of the P O

To split the payment document value as per the line items of the purchase order in the period of payment, so that the payment amounts are measured against the Capex order assigned as account assignment in the purchase order.(Account assignment tab for the individual line item in the PO.
Example:
Inputs:
Purchase Order 3100012345, line item 10 value 6000 line item 20 value 4000
VAT @10% , account assignment for PO line item 10(Internal Order no 10001) & line item 20 Internal Order 10002) G/ R no 5105105101 for Rs10,000.
The I/R doc 501501501 appears as follows: (MIRO)
Line 10: Value      Rs   6,000
        20: Value      Rs   4,000
VAT                        Rs      600
                       Rs      400
Total                       Rs11, 000
Withholding Tax Rs 1,100
The accounting entry for MIRO happens as follows: doc 2102102101
GR/IR Dr      Rs 10,000
VAT      Dr     Rs   1.000
Vendor    Cr           Rs9, 900
TDS due   Cr          Rs1, 100
The business expects the payment report as follows:payment doc 2001200101
PO     Line item      Internal Order MIRO        Invoice                       Payment       Payment period Amount
                                                                                A/c doc number        doc number
3400012345     10     10001           5605605601 2102102101           2001200101       001/2009           5940
3400012345     20     10002     5605605601     2102102101           2001200101        001/2009          3960
Currently we are able to show the amounts as Rs 6000 for line item 10 & Rs 4000 for line item 20.
The problems faced.
1.     The VAT line items are auto created, hence the reference of purchase order number and line item are not available. So the VAT portion which is part of payment liability does not get reflected against the PO.(not able to show the VAT portion , when we try to show the payment amount per PO line item.)
2.     The withholding tax is also a problem; WHT is not calculated and assigned per line item. It is calculated on the total amount of basic and VAT. Because of these reasons, the payment could not be shown properly according to the line item of the purchase order.
3.     When part payment is made, against invoices, there is no provision to assign a payment amount against a particular line item. Further, when final payment is made in different period, the clearing document will get generated. That adds to the complexity of differentiating full payments and part payments final clearing.
4.     When residual payment is made, a new line item is created. Here assignment of Purchase order line item against payment for residual items become a problem.
5.     Many a times advance payments are made. Later the invoice is created and balance payment is made. In those situations, the clearing document creates one more line item and makes payment for the balance item. This adds complexity in bringing balance payment alone and to split as per the purchase order line item. The clearing document number system is multi dimensional. It creates two line items for the same item (one at the time of advance and another the time of clearing.)
6.     When full payment is made, the payment document number and clearing document numbers are same. In cases of subsequent or partial or residual payment, the document numbers are different. Because of this, the part payment amounts are shown in the period, where the final payment and clearing are made.
Please suggest a way to split the payment amount in the exact posting period with all the considerations given above.
Regards
Sundararajan
Edited by: Sundarajan Venkatachari on Sep 30, 2009 11:04 AM

Hi,
See Note 301077 - User exits for the interface to accounting, although I think that there isn't this kind of option. Note 429117 - Collective note advice note SD-FI interface will be useful too.
I think that SAP Note 1085921 - Document split perhaps will help you
Regards
Eduardo

Unable to print multiple copies of documents on Win7 machine with Office 2010

Since upgrading to Windows 7, I have been unable to print multiple copies of documents in any MS Office 2007, 2010, Word Pad or Adobe Reader 9. I also experience the same problem if I print from Word Pad. The issue appears to be associated with the Collate Option in the Print Dialog box. If the Collate box is checked, I only get one copy of the document. If I uncheck the Collate box I get as many copies as I choose. The problem is that with the Collate box unchecked, I have to collate multiple copies by hand, and with 10 – 20 copies of multi-page documents that can be quite a chore.
The ironic thing is that MS Visio 2003, on the same machine, prints and collates as many copies as I choose, with the Collate box checked.
I can print multiple copies of Word 2003 documents from my wife’s Win XP machine to the same printer, but not from my Win 7 machine with Office 2010.
My printer is an HP LaserJet 1320nw and I have downloaded and installed the latest printer drivers from the HP Web site.
Has anyone experienced this problem, and if so, are you aware of a solution other than unchecking the Collate box?

I have the same issues with my LJ1320. I have Office 2010 and Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit. However, my printing problem is more widespread since I have been unsuccessful at printing multiple copies of all types of documents, not just from Office 2010. For example, I have the same problem trying to print multiple copies from Internet Explorer.
I also have other problems printing from Office 2010 that you may not have discovered yet. I cannot print Excel spreadsheet grid lines from Office 2010 if those documents were originally created in an earlier version of Office. I tried saving them as Office 2010 documents and also using compatibility mode but nothing worked. These same documents print fine on the same printer from my laptop which uses Windows Vista and Office 2007. Also Excel spreadsheets originated in Office 2010 print nicely.
Looks like HP has a few bugs in their printer drivers.
I note that HP released a new Universal Print Driver for Windows PCL5x64 on Feb 18, 2011 (Version 5.2.6). Have you tried it yet?

Invoice report by document value

Hi Gurus,
I need your assistance in producing a report. Basically we need to get a report showing how much invoices we have entered on a Sales Org with a value below £250.00 for the last 3 months (Oct, Nov & Dec). Can you please advise how I should proceed?
Many Thanks
Kumar

Dear Kumar
Go to VF05 or VF05N and execute the report. There you can see a tab Net Value. Sort it in ascending order so that the report will be sorted based on the least value of the billing document to maximum value of billing document.
If you want to specifically have an option to key in maximum or minimum document value, then you need to go to SE16, key in table VBRP and consider the field NETWR for net value of the billing document.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Differenct between Net Value and Document Value on a sales order

Can someone please explain what is the difference between the Net Value that we see on the sales order (VA03) and the 'Document Value' thats checked against in Dynamic credit checking?
Thanks

In transaction FD32, you maintain credit limit for customer and assign risk category for the customer.
In transaction OVA8, there are two main types of checks - Static or Dynamic.
System checks the following for arriving at customers credit status-
Static credit check - It compares the credit limit assigned to the customer to the total value of open sales orders, plus the total value of open deliveries not yet invoiced, plus the total value of open billing documents not yet passed on to accounting, plus the total value of billing documents that have been passed on to accounting, but which have not yet been paid by the customer.
Dynamic credit check - It compares customeru2019s credit limit to the total of open sales orders not yet delivered, plus the total value of open deliveries not yet invoiced, plus the total value of open billing documents not yet passed onto accounting, plus the total value of billing documents that have been passed onto accounting, but which have not yet been paid by the customer. In addition you can use Horizon functionality also.
You can perform additional checks in addition to dynamic or static credit check. One of them is document value check.
If you check this box then a additional credit check is done when the maximum document value assigned is exceeded. This is useful if business requires that all sales orders above a certain limit are to be blocked.
In your case, the document value is $0.00.
So system is not doing any additional credit check.
It would just do Dynamic or Static credit check with relevant assignment maintained in transaction FD32 for the said customer.

COPA billing documents - reverse and repost in different period

At the end of the period accounting is required to reverse certain sales posted for the period and repost to the following period due to shipping terms and revenue recognition requirements. They currently do this in FI using a high level entry in FB50. How can we also reverse and repost the COPA billing documents to a different period?
Thanks
Twila

Hi,
You should not be required to assign a profit center in OKB9 except for a few situations where the system does (can) not put profit center in the line item or you do not put profit center while posting.
Therefore, if the the profit center is alreadt in line item then the OKB9 profit center will not be defaulted.
Use of OKB9 for default profit center should be done sparingly.
Regards,
Sanjay Wagh

Material document value

Hello everyone,
In my case, value in the material document slightly differs from the billing document value. So we have decided to move the material document value to the billing document ( in VPRS).
Now a new routine will be added in the price pocedure, which will have logic saying, "pull the value from material document".
Does anyone know what logic to be written so as to pull the value from the material document.
Thanks,

Hi,
If you had selected the Single Account assignment instead of Distr on qty Basis, you will not have face this problem. Actually its not the problem. Since you had selected the option of 'Distr. on Qty basis', system has treated it as multiple account assignment.
and its valuation will only be carried out Invoice Verification level.
Later on check the Material document also.
Pls Check as mentioned below:
If flag 'GR non-valuated' is set in the purchase order, the valuation is only executed through the invoice verification. This flag must be set if the purchase order has multiple account assignment.
A valuated goods receipt for a purchase order with account assignment generates a posting line for the consumption account 'Account-assigned purchase order' (KBS) and for the GR/IR clearing account WRX.
hope it address your issue.
Regards,
S Anand

COPA - Flow of values for Sales Order

Team,
We follow the process of creating an Inquiry and sales Order leading to billing. Values were flowing from Sales order properly when we were not creating the Inquiry. Now when the Inquiry is created , SO values are not flowing. When we run the post processing for transfer of values COPA says error message says " Create a Sales Order " for the inquiries which do not have SO. Where the SO's have been created - system says its duplicate and cannot be posted.
Bottomline - SO values are not flowing to COPA.
Please advise...
Cheers
Kartik

Hi Karthik,
I gues you are getting error KF755 in your process.
Please first check the Long Text of error message KF 755:
Sales document "" was not transferred to Profitability Analysis (CO-PA) because it is not relevant for the analyses in CO-PA.
This can be due to one of the following reasons (among others):
- The document type is not profit-related, such as an inquiry.
- The sales document shows zero for the quantity.
- The sales document has been denied.
- The sales document is locked due to credit reasons.'
Please also check the attached notes 592231 and in particular note 20254.
In case of make-to-order process the invoice will be assigned to the sales order and will not be directly transferred to COPA. With the order settlement the costs and the revenues (invoice) will then be posten to COPA.
That means that in this case CO-PA is not updated during invoicing but via transaction VA88 for the sales order linked to it.
You can check this if you look at table VBAP (for the relevant sales order). If the field KZVBR is set to 'E' the invoice belongs to an make-to-order process.
Best Regards,
Abhisek Patnaik

COPA Billing document

Hello Experts,
We encounted an issue regarding COPA if we look at the Sales order Item level here we have created 5 line items out of that, 3 line items Profit segment has updated with the correct values Product, billing type, sales org, profit center. etc.,
However if we look at 2 line items of the sales order profit segment is BLANK..
could you please guide us how to investigate further.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Regards,
satish.

Hi Ajay,
As per your instructions i have verified AAG as been assigned in Material master, and however i have checked in VKOA
the sales deduction General Account was not assigned to AAG group category , this is the reason for not updating Prof. Seg document in the order...
iF yes kindy give me your explaination it would be great to here from you.
Thanks a lot...
With Best Regards,
Satish.

COPA Profitability document values

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for