COPA report value wrong

Hi Gurus,
I have write a copa report , i have assigned in  KE4I sd condition type to value filed, so +/- are assigned in PR00 and VPRS condition typs ..still i am getting wrong value ..ie Reversal document value also add to the report  ex billing document Rs 2500 and reversal document Rs 2400/- but in COPA report value is  Rs 4900/-  why and where my config or report was wrong
let me know.
Regards
Vinu

Hi
Presently in costing sheet there are two continuous processes, both are considered as SFG (semi finished goods). The SFG 1 material in first process is the BOM part of the second process SFG 3 material. Both process has different cost centres, overheads and cost elements.
Now the second process of SFG material takes more than 9 months. So want to show this WIP under maturation stock, as separate stock under new SFG 2 material, with some value addition (considered as activity). This new process related SFG 2 material BOM will contains the first process SFG 1 material. And this new SFG 2 material code will be the part of BOM of the last process SFG 3 material.
Now there are 1 issues we are facing.
1st query:
In quality server after transporting the request from Development, Price difference account is generated while production of the 3rd Process SFG 3 material.
Production made for 1000 AL Qty (Base Qty of BOM 1000 AL and Costing lot size 1000 AL ) and in the entry we are getting the Price difference entry as shown below.
Dr. Inventory SFG3 - 105,897.43
Cr. Incr/Decr/Cons SFG 3 - 105,900.00
Cr. Price difference - 2.57
Cr. Inventory SFG2 - 94,550.00
Dr. Incr/Decr/Cons SFG2 - 94,550.00
Standard cost of SFG 3 for 1000 AL is 105,897.43 and Standard cost of SFG 2 for 1000 AL is 94,550.00
May i know why the price difference account is picked up while doing the production of existing material SFG 3, when there is no such difference in development server. And no Price difference account in Quality server before introducing the new process?
Regards
Vinu

Similar Messages

  • Local Currency COP, KRW values wrong in report

    I have the following problem. Any values in local currency COP (Columbian Pesos) or KRW (Korean Won) comes in a report 100 times in value. For example if the value in the infocube is 1950  COP, in the report it shows as 195,000 COP. This happens only for currencies COP, KRW. For all other currencies the value in the cube and report are same. This is happening in AR cube, AP cube, Inventory cube.
    How to correct and is there any setting to be done for this.
    Please note that i am not using any currency conversion. I am just reporting in local currency .
    Ram

    Hi Ram,
    It should be a bug.
    The situation is the following.
    For example, you load amount in COP (KRW) = 12345. Since default number of decimal places for amounts with currency is 2, the system keeps amount loaded as 12345,00 (with 2 decimals).
    There is a special table TCURX which lists currencies with number of decimals not equal to 2 (you can also access or set values in this table through SPRO -> SAP Netweaver -> General settings -> Currencies -> Set decimal places for currencies).
    I beleive you can find KRW & COP in the mentioned above table with number of decimals not set (zero).
    During query result generation the system apply the real number of decimals from TCURX table and 12345,00 is treated as amount without decimals (coma simply ignored). That gives 1234500 amount. The same amount in TND (with 3 decimals) becomes 1234,500 etc.
    There are plenty of OSS notes about this bug, for example, # 760195. Not sure which one to implement. You’d better contact SAP Support.
    As a workaround I can suggest either delete KWR & COP from TCURX table or use amounts without currency or as number (with a separate 0CURRENCY field going into the cube).
    Best regards,
    Eugene

  • Copa report values not coming in report

    hi Gurus
    In copa Values are not coming in report.
    where is the problem
    can anybody suggest
    bye
    Ramesh Reddy

    Hi Ramesh,
    First u check with whether the COPA is integrated with other modules or not? that means with fi/mm and co and SD...

  • Discount are reflecting with wrong sign in COPA Reports..

    HI,
        We have checked the +/- sign in one of the conditon type which is assigned to Value fields VV210(Discount and markdowns).
    Now due to this check mark values of discount from Billing document are reflecting as negarive in COPA reports which is wrong. For the Debit memo's all values should reflect in COPA as positive, but for discount it is reflecting as negative.
    So now we are having almost 400+ invoices which are having this issue. So how can we correct this sign in COPA. Is there any way that can help us to change the sign from - to +.
    Kindly suggeset...
    Regards....

    In the rules of engagement, you will see that he most important rule is to SEARCH before you request a question.
    It is the hallmark of a good configurer that he will search high and low for a solution.
    Your question is not complicated, but it is very involved, and has been answered on this forum before, more than once.

  • Sales order values not coming in copa report can been seen in ke24

    hi
    i have did sd and billing and actual settlement through va88
    i can able to values in ke24 actual line items.
    but when i cant able to see values in ke30 copa report aganist sales order characteristic
    and aganist record type A values are not flowing in copa report.
    please help me.
    thanks
    kareem

    hi ajay,
    i have again prepare actual line items report from ke94 ,ke91 and executed report ,
    here for that particular sales order values are flowing through record type C but not flowing for record type A.
    sales order is not displaying for record type A.
    and for that c only revenue and  and  raw material cost is flowing.
    thanks
    kareem

  • COPA Report Sales Actual value is not getting picked up

    HI,
    I have creted a COPA REPORT that is Plan vs Actual
    all values are getting picked up in report except sales actual value .
    could you give us some informatin regarding the same ?
    In column actual sales i have selection characteristics 0 only
    And my general data selection is Record Type is From A To I
    Thanks
    Nilesh R

    HI,
    I have creted a COPA REPORT that is Plan vs Actual
    all values are getting picked up in report except sales actual value .
    could you give us some informatin regarding the same ?
    In column actual sales i have selection characteristics 0 only
    And my general data selection is Record Type is From A To I
    Thanks
    Nilesh R

  • COPA report and purchase order value mismatched

    Dear Experts,
    In copa report ke30 COGS value come Rs 12129805 and in purchage order it shown 767537.34 which was assigned the sales order.
    In KE33 report i checked VRPRS was th value field which data flowing to copa and input parameter recoed type B to F.
    VPRS condition type assigned wit VRPRS value field in ke4i(Assignment of SD to copa value field).
    Please suggest why data coming mismatch.
    Regards,
    Debashis

    Hi,
    There could be difference in material prices mentioned in the PO,
    and at the time of PGI/billing. check material prices
    Please check material prices for those material for the period.
    Regards,
    Kedar

  • COPA Plan values not appearing in report

    Hi
    I posted COPA Plan values using KEPM and line items are appearing in KE25 but no values are not being appeared in COPA line item report we created using report painter. We used KE94 and KE91.
    Actual values appearing correctly in report.
    Any help??

    Check if you have Plan/Act indicator maintained correctly with the plan value. If it shows up in other reports, I don't see any reason why it will not show up here. I would also check other parameters entered in the report and see if any other characteristic is preventing plan values from populating.
    Shail

  • Help- COPA Report KE30 Unusual value problem

    Hi,
    My COPA report from ke30 showing the bellow value which is unusal to my real value. though we are now entering backlog data but the COGS value which is showing is more less than the actual value. please suggest what to do to correct the report.
    Sales quantity            1,958,412.000
    Gross Revenue             653593,271.00
    VAT                            86,064,276.00
    Net Revenue(aftr VAT      567528,995.00
    Sales Excess              19,721,488.00
    Freight Revenue            5,491,314.00
    Total Revenues            592741,797.00
    % Based discount              0.00
    Quantity based disco       0.00
    Material Rebate               0.00
    Customer Rebate            9,556,570.00
    Free of charge                 3,499.97
    Net Revenue(Aft dis) 583188,726.97
    Raw Material                       0.00
    Packing Material              0.00
    Labour Var                         0.00
    Raw Material                       0.00
    Packing Material              0.00
    Labour Var                         0.00
    Labour Fix                         0.00
    Power Var                          0.00
    Power Fixed                        0.00
    Mfg OH Var                         0.00
    Mfg OH Fixed                  0.00
    Packing OH Variable      0.00
    COGS                           495040,646.82
    COGS Internal price       24,647,600.96
    Mfg Cost(Standard)            0.00
    Production Variance       28,883,245.46-
    Purchase variance          5,002,496.04-
    Revaluation of Inven         275,261.45-
    Actual Cost               34,161,002.95-
    Gross Profit              617349,729.92
    Admn Exp                           0.00
    Depreciation                       0.00
    Finance Exp                        0.00
    Selling and Dist Exp          0.00
    Thanks
    Rajib

    Hi rajibimran
    There is a transaction (KE27) that reavaluates standard price for actual price.
    I dont know how your system is set, but during months all cost elements are set using standard price.
    During period end closing, after you run actual costs (CKMLCP) you have to revaluate CO-PA with actual price.
    Regards
    Fred

  • COPA report showing as positive values which should be show as Nagitive val

    Dear Experts
    I have one issue with COPA and Profit center reports reconciliation where the both have same structure
    user  compareing the (Period :dec 2011)  report PCA and COPA there identified some values are difference  so we started investgation
    one of the cost element showing in nagitive value in accoungint document and same  it is showing postive value in COPA report
    that values for debit and credit line items are adding (,) insted of Cancellation  (+,-) , so that COPA report is incresed the value for one value field when compare with PCA report line items
    could you please let any guide me where is the problem is occuring
    thanks
    Rana

    Hi,
       The COPA sign logic depends on the cost element type used (costs or revenues) and also the customizing of the '+/-  transfer sign' in tcode KE4I.
    The following table shows an overview of how condition values are
    updated in CO-PA for billing documents from SD:
    Billing document (normal) "With +/- sign"    "Without +/- sign"
    Debit posting                          negative            positive
      (such as sales deductions)
    Credit posting                         positive            positive
      (such as sales revenues)
    Credit memo/return         "With +/- sign"    "Without +/- sign"
    Debit posting                          negative            negative
      (such as sales revenues)
    Credit posting                         positive            negative
      (such as sales deductions)
    The "+/- sign" refers to the "Transfer +/- sign" flag in tcode KE4I where you assign SD conditions to COPA value fields.
    If the system is behaving as shown above and you want a different behavior then you could change the sign in user exit COPA0002.
    regards
    Waman

  • RA values in COPA report

    Hi,
    In COPA report, we get cumulative figure of both actual revenue and the RA figures either Rev in excess billings or Revenue surplus in the Revenue value field. But, we would like to show in the copa report, what is the actual revenue and the values against Revenue in excess billings and Revenue surplus seperately.  I have explored and but could not find any clue. If any of you met this type of requirement and appreciate if you can share with this agust forum.
    Regards!!

    Hi
    I try...
    Basically you need to create two line IDs in my case these were:
    T70 POC Sales
    T71 T Sales
    In OKG5 I linked all revenue costelements to T70 with requirement to capaitalize. No assignement has to be made to T71.
    In OKG4 (Update for LineIDs), I added both, T70 and T71, with category E "revenues" and two different costelements. In the appropriate PA Transfer Structure I added the costelements to the correct value field (either POC sales or sales).
    In enhancement KKAG0001 I used exit EXIT_SAPLKKAG_001 and include ZXKAGU01. Coding (in extracts as we do other stuff within this user exit):
      DATA: lt_sume   TYPE TABLE OF xkabasis WITH HEADER LINE.
      DATA: lt_sumd   TYPE TABLE OF xkaabgr WITH HEADER LINE.
      DATA: BEGIN OF ls,
             soll TYPE istkumkg,
             sollp TYPE istkumkg,
             sollc TYPE istkumkg,
             ist  TYPE istkumkg,
             diff TYPE istkumkg,
            END OF ls.
      CLEAR ls.
      LOOP AT import_basis WHERE kateg = 'E'.
        lt_sume = import_basis.
        CLEAR: lt_sume-zlnid, lt_sume-bewkz.
        COLLECT lt_sume.
      ENDLOOP.
      READ TABLE lt_sume INDEX 1.
      READ TABLE import_abgrenzun WITH KEY zlnid = 'T70'.
      ls-ist                     = import_abgrenzun-abgrkumkg.
      ls-sollp                   = ls-soll - lt_sume-istkumkg.
      ls-sollc                   = ls-soll + ls-sollp.
      ls-diff  = ( ls-ist - ls-sollp ) * - 1.
      export_veraender-abgty     = 'D'.
      export_veraender-zlnid     = 'T70'.
      export_veraender-abgrverkg = ls-diff.
      APPEND export_veraender.
      ls-diff                    = lt_sume-istkumkg.
      export_veraender-abgty     = 'D'.
      export_veraender-zlnid     = 'T71'.
      export_veraender-abgrverkg = ls-diff.
      APPEND export_veraender.
    With this POC and real sales are splitted to T70 and T71.
    I hope this helps!
    Best regards
    Benjamin

  • Characteristic Values are not updated in COPA Report

    Dear Gurus
    I have created one characteristics  and derive the value out of derivation rule but the same is not appearing in the COPA Report even though I mapped that Characteristics in my COPA Report.  Please advice and help.
    Sivakumar Subramanian

    Dear Jayaram
    While creating the Derivation Rules I checked the derivation is working fine or not by giving the inputs and it is working and no error in deriving the characteristcis.
    Please help.
    Sivakumar Subramanian

  • Value in Index-based currency in COPA report

    Dear all,
    I activate COPA with both accounting-based and Costing-based, I found that In Costing-based only Operating concern currency and company code currency display ,and in account-based we have 3 currency: transaction currency, company code currency and operating concern currency.
    In FI config OB22 for commany code, we add Index-based currency and hard currency.
    Is there any way to get and view value in Index-based currency in COPA report (accounting-based or costing based) ?
    Thank you very much,
    Dat Lam

    Hi Dat Lam,
    I am sorry to tell you that Index based currency can not be used in CO-PA in any form. This is not designed in the application.
    Best Regards,
    Abhisek

  • COPA Report current period and previous period issue

    Hi Gurus,
    I have defined COPA report (Tcode KE94) based on line items. Now I want all values to be displayed based on an entry parameter in terms of period. That is to say that  If I give input values of "010.2013" as a period entry , my report should display the values for the the period specified i.e. 010.2013 in the first column and in second column  values for the period 009.2013 should be displayed and in the third column values for the period 001.2013 till 010.2013 should be displayed cumulatively.
    For this, I choosed the character "period/year" in General data selection tab, clicked "Variable on/off" tab and gave values "From"  as well as "To" for the Global Variable "OFP"  which is Curr.fisc.per./year.
    For the 1st column (1st column which is suppose to display the values according to selection parameter), along with the character "company code" , I choosed the character "period" and clicked "Variable on/off" tab and gave value "From"  as well as "To" for the Global Variable "OFP"  which is Curr.fisc.per./year.
    For the 2nd column (2nd column which is suppose to display the values for the immediately preceeding period of the selection parameter), along with the character "company code" , I choosed the character "period" and clicked "Variable on/off" tab and gave value "From"  as well as "To" for the Global Variable "OFP"  which is Curr.fisc.per./year. While doing so, I selected operator as "-" and choosed offset as 1.
    For the 3rd column (3rd column which is suppose to display the cumulative values from the beginning of the fiscal year till the period mentioned in the selection parameter), along with the character "company code" , I choosed the character "period" and selected 001 in "From" and 016 in "To" tab.
    Company Code selected in all the three columns is same and I have selected actual values i.e. 0 for "plan/actual indicator" tab.
    When I run the report through Tcode KE30 , I give values as "010.2013" for the From and To selection tabs. System shows the values as per the selection parameter in the 1st column which is correct  but display values same as per coulmn 1st in the 3rd column which is wrong because it should be cumulative. 2nd column is blank. 
    How to display the values for the immediately preceeding period and for cumulative period?
    Regards,
    makrand

    Dear Ajay,
    Thanks for the reply. Here are the screen shots.
    For the general data selection tab
    For the first column "current month" i.e. for the month
    For the second column "Last Months"
    For the third column "Cumulative" i.e. year to date
    Following is the result of KE30
    Values for the period 010.2013
    You can see that values in the report for the period 011.2013 contains value for the previous period which is 59090.21
    This value is matching when the report is run for the period 010.2013.
    But in both the reports,the figures for Current month and YTD (year to date) are same.
    Please let me know what setting is required in the current month column.
    Regards,
    makrand

  • Regarding COPA report related to refurbishment Process

    Hi ,
    When I am running a refurbishment process in IDES system is taking the GL a/c 895000- Factory output of production when I take the refurbishable material from store and return to inventory.
    My question is whether all the financial posting done here for refurbishable material  should be reflected to COPA report or not?
    If yes, I am unable to see this particular G/L account posting in COPA. What could be the reason?
    Regards
    DP.

    Hi
    Whether it is right G/l,
    It's depends on you & your fico & client team.
    If this account exclusively defined for refurbished material,then it is right and if this g/l is defined for any other transaction then it wrong one.
    Now Related to COPA entries,
    Settle the order for which you are consuming this material by KO88, (Remove tick mark of TEST RUN)
    Go to details>>>Accounting document>>>double click on Profitability analysis
    and see values are updated in Cost field or not.
    Kapil
    Edited by: Kapildev Farakte on Nov 25, 2009 11:18 AM
    Edited by: Kapildev Farakte on Nov 25, 2009 11:20 AM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Best way to generate report on huge data table

    Hi, I am using Oracle11g. I want to generate reports on transaction tables containing huge amount of data, on which very frequently DMLs are performing in real time. i want to keep my report/result in RESULT_CACHE for 15 mins. active. whenever any in

  • Purchasing with reference to sales order

    Hi, Can anyone help me to resolve the following issue. while creating PO with reference to PR which is generated automatically through sales order,we want to restrict the GL account. that is when GR is done for that PO it should not hit the sales ord

  • Watching iTunes Movie on Apple TV while streaming sound to multiple AirPlay speakers

    Hi Everyone, I bought a pair of Airplay speakers and Apple TV 3rd generation to watch my Movies in the iTunes library. Importantly, I want to listen to the movies sound on multiple Airplay speakers while watching. So far I couldn't activate the speak

  • Sync issues after updating with ios7

    I downloaded ios7 to my iphone and after performing the usual sync with my PC, my tasks and calendar appts from Outlook have now all been wiped.  Sure, there all there now on my iphone and in iCloud, but how do I get them back on my PC - Outlook, sin

  • Trouble Restoring my iPod touch 2G

    Hey, I tried restoring my ipod touch and it told me that it was unable to restore due to error code 1602, I googled that and it told me to reinstall itunes, I did that and now I'm getting error code 1601. Any tips on how to successfully get it to res