COPA report showing as positive values which should be show as Nagitive val

Dear Experts
I have one issue with COPA and Profit center reports reconciliation where the both have same structure
user  compareing the (Period :dec 2011)  report PCA and COPA there identified some values are difference  so we started investgation
one of the cost element showing in nagitive value in accoungint document and same  it is showing postive value in COPA report
that values for debit and credit line items are adding (,) insted of Cancellation  (+,-) , so that COPA report is incresed the value for one value field when compare with PCA report line items
could you please let any guide me where is the problem is occuring
thanks
Rana

Hi,
   The COPA sign logic depends on the cost element type used (costs or revenues) and also the customizing of the '+/-  transfer sign' in tcode KE4I.
The following table shows an overview of how condition values are
updated in CO-PA for billing documents from SD:
Billing document (normal) "With +/- sign"    "Without +/- sign"
Debit posting                          negative            positive
  (such as sales deductions)
Credit posting                         positive            positive
  (such as sales revenues)
Credit memo/return         "With +/- sign"    "Without +/- sign"
Debit posting                          negative            negative
  (such as sales revenues)
Credit posting                         positive            negative
  (such as sales deductions)
The "+/- sign" refers to the "Transfer +/- sign" flag in tcode KE4I where you assign SD conditions to COPA value fields.
If the system is behaving as shown above and you want a different behavior then you could change the sign in user exit COPA0002.
regards
Waman

Similar Messages

  • Issue with Report to get Position value for each Class ID.

    Hello Experts,
    m working on a report where I want Position values as on date.
    for an entered date report should give position value(Amount for transaction) for each class Id.
    I m trying using the exit variable but could not reach the output.
    For date I created an exit variable which shoud return the latest position for each class Id.
    Now this exit variable is "ready for Input" . when I debug my code it takes i_step =3 and i_vanm= " " after i_step = 1 and i_vnam = "<variablename>"
    how do I go about to get the solution.
    Guide me to come up with desired output.
    Thanks in Adv.
    Bhavna.

    Hello Experts,
    m working on a report where I want Position values as on date.
    for an entered date report should give position value(Amount for transaction) for each class Id.
    I m trying using the exit variable but could not reach the output.
    For date I created an exit variable which shoud return the latest position for each class Id.
    Now this exit variable is "ready for Input" . when I debug my code it takes i_step =3 and i_vanm= " " after i_step = 1 and i_vnam = "<variablename>"
    how do I go about to get the solution.
    Guide me to come up with desired output.
    Thanks in Adv.
    Bhavna.

  • COPA report and purchase order value mismatched

    Dear Experts,
    In copa report ke30 COGS value come Rs 12129805 and in purchage order it shown 767537.34 which was assigned the sales order.
    In KE33 report i checked VRPRS was th value field which data flowing to copa and input parameter recoed type B to F.
    VPRS condition type assigned wit VRPRS value field in ke4i(Assignment of SD to copa value field).
    Please suggest why data coming mismatch.
    Regards,
    Debashis

    Hi,
    There could be difference in material prices mentioned in the PO,
    and at the time of PGI/billing. check material prices
    Please check material prices for those material for the period.
    Regards,
    Kedar

  • Query value output should be positive

    Hello ,
    I am working on one finance query and requiremnt is that query out for that report must be positive value even it takes negative value.
    Is there any way to get positive value?
    Thanks
    CPY

    Kevin,
    I would definitely reinstall Lookout -- whether it be 4.5 or 5.0.  Uninstall 4.5 first.  Also, the following KB may be of interest.
    Doug M
    Applications Engineer
    National Instruments
    For those unfamiliar with NBC's The Office, my icon is NOT a picture of me

  • Balance Sheet Account Balance in COPA Report

    Dear Experts,
         My Client Requirement in COPA is: Working Capital Value should be viewed in COPA Report. So the value fileld balance is CA-CL. these operation will be done by blance sheet accounts.
    So, Is the Balance Account values will flow to COPA?
    Please suggest me with detail.
    Thanking in advance,
    Regards,
    Balaji

    Dear sir,
        I tried with what you said in KA01. But system showing this message...
    G/L account 10000000 is a balance sheet account
    Message no. KS036
    Diagnosis
    G/L account 10000000 is defined in FI as a balance sheet account.
    System Response
    Balance sheet accounts cannot be created as cost elements in cost accounting, except for:
    Asset reconciliation accounts
    Material stock accounts for valuated sales order stock for sales orders or projects.
    Really I  appreciate your response...
    Please give me the soulution...
    Regards,
    Balaji

  • Table for KE30 COPA report

    Hi,
    I have written COPA Report using t.codes  KE35 and KE32 for KE30 COPA report...some values are not pickup
    Could u tel me KE30 Report ...reffering on which table of CE1 table or else ?  so that i can try .
    Thanks & Regards.
    Vinu.

    Hi Vinu
    To reconcile your output of KE30 with actual posted values
    1. Ensure that you have covered all posible record types in your report definition
    2. Ensure you have covered all value fields and none has been missed out
    3. Check if you have specified any char value which is filtering the output so that all values are not displayed in the output
    Identify the value field where the values are not matching, say, Sales Revenue....
    Now execute your KE30 reports and drill down by product or customer and compare side by side with KE24.. Check in which product or which customer is the issue.... Adopt this mechanism and you will possbly come to know of the true reason
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • TDS Amount on Vendor Advance Shows positive value in *QUERY* for TDS Report

    Hi Everybody,
    I have made a query for List of TDS Report with Vendor informations as required by my client. In which the value of TDS on Vendor Advance Payment appears as positive value instaead of negative value. Please suggest how to rectify.
    Thanks,
    Paul

    Dear,
    If you have cleared the advance in F-54, then this will reverse the tax amount. That could be the reason for tax amount in debit.

  • Showing the UoM in COPA Reports

    Hi experts,
    Our clients sell many kinds of products, in which each of them can have a different UoM.
    Example:
    - Product A: 100 pc
    - Product B: 10kg
    That is why, we need to be able to show the UoM in the COPA Report.
    Well, as far as i know, there is a fixed characteristic "Unit Sales Qty", but that is not what we want since it shows in the same way as the other characteristic in the drilldown report.
    How can we set this UoM in the same column as the value field? (maybe beside it?)
    Is this possible?
    Thank you very much in advance
    BR, Erwin Hartono

    Hi Adi,
    We have maintained that in KE4M.
    In line item, it is shown though, but not in KE30...
    The qty and the UoM is correctly transferred, however, my issue is that, they can't be shown in drilldown reporting side by side with the value field of sales qty. Normally, that UoM will be populated in the characteristics which is at the left side of the graphical output COPA report, which is not something we want, because it will need an extra effort from the user side to drilldown to that characteristics.
    So, the main goal here is to be able to show the UoM side by side with the qty field in COPA graphical report.
    Thank you very much for your help
    BR, Erwin

  • Help- COPA Report KE30 Unusual value problem

    Hi,
    My COPA report from ke30 showing the bellow value which is unusal to my real value. though we are now entering backlog data but the COGS value which is showing is more less than the actual value. please suggest what to do to correct the report.
    Sales quantity            1,958,412.000
    Gross Revenue             653593,271.00
    VAT                            86,064,276.00
    Net Revenue(aftr VAT      567528,995.00
    Sales Excess              19,721,488.00
    Freight Revenue            5,491,314.00
    Total Revenues            592741,797.00
    % Based discount              0.00
    Quantity based disco       0.00
    Material Rebate               0.00
    Customer Rebate            9,556,570.00
    Free of charge                 3,499.97
    Net Revenue(Aft dis) 583188,726.97
    Raw Material                       0.00
    Packing Material              0.00
    Labour Var                         0.00
    Raw Material                       0.00
    Packing Material              0.00
    Labour Var                         0.00
    Labour Fix                         0.00
    Power Var                          0.00
    Power Fixed                        0.00
    Mfg OH Var                         0.00
    Mfg OH Fixed                  0.00
    Packing OH Variable      0.00
    COGS                           495040,646.82
    COGS Internal price       24,647,600.96
    Mfg Cost(Standard)            0.00
    Production Variance       28,883,245.46-
    Purchase variance          5,002,496.04-
    Revaluation of Inven         275,261.45-
    Actual Cost               34,161,002.95-
    Gross Profit              617349,729.92
    Admn Exp                           0.00
    Depreciation                       0.00
    Finance Exp                        0.00
    Selling and Dist Exp          0.00
    Thanks
    Rajib

    Hi rajibimran
    There is a transaction (KE27) that reavaluates standard price for actual price.
    I dont know how your system is set, but during months all cost elements are set using standard price.
    During period end closing, after you run actual costs (CKMLCP) you have to revaluate CO-PA with actual price.
    Regards
    Fred

  • Decimal Places is not showing in Qty field in COPA report

    Hi,
    I have made a COPA report using one form that I have made it through TC:KE34.
    I have used ABSMG for Sales qty in my report.
    What I am observing in report, the qty is  not showing the decimal places for exmaple 6.032 MT but it gets round over to 6 MT.
    I want the system should show the 3 decimal places for the Sales Qty.
    How to do resolve this.
    Regards
    Kami

    Hi Ajay,
    No this is somthing new you mentioned. I havent tried to change the number format after executing the report.
    Please let me know how to do that. I am using Object ALV to display the report and I am not getting any option in the menus to change the number format.
    Also I noticed one thing, In other output format like drill down report its coming correctly , only in Object ALV output format its showing the rounded values.
    Please let me know the path.
    Regards
    Kami

  • Copa report will be show for a given period

    Hi,
    We have created the report for Apr to Mar. Input selection option available for period is there.
    the client wants if he give for a period lets say AUG, report should show only August column only not 12 columns ( remaining 11 months shows with zero values). Please advice
    Regards,
    Azeem

    Hi Azeem
    Copy your report form and hide or delete other 11 columns...
    Do not hard code the char value for "period" in the column.. This way, Whatever value you specify in the selection screen, the report would display the values for tat period alone
    Also, if your report definition allows it, enter From and To period as same and check if it results out values for other periods or not...
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • In Standard report VF05n under Net value system shows Basic price + Excise

    Dear Team,
    In Standard report VF05n under Net value system shows Basic price + Excise n' Taxes. where as i required only Basic price in that column and Excise and Taxes separately  in separate columns.
    Plz, Suggest
    Thanks
    Gaurav

    Hi Gaurav,
    The netvalue in this report comes from the invoice, which in turn determined by your pricing procedure. If you want only the basic price to be your net value, you have to adjust the same in your pricing procedure. But this is not advisable, as there are other price components also in your pricing procedure, rather you can develop a new report with the required details for your requirement.
    Regards
    Vijay

  • Profit center report showing double the plan value comparing to cost center

    Dear Friends,
    We have an issue with the profit center report wherein we have maintained forecast value in version 2 in cost centers and when we run profit center report the values are showing double the value which we maintained in cost centers. Is this the problem in running 1KE0 transaction.?. We have run 1KE0 to update the missing value by deleting the existing values, so few profit center report is corrected but many other profit center report has gone wrong.
    Could you please guide me to correct the values. Business requires to see the same value in cost and profit center. Note; We have created cost and profit centers the same code and assigned to each other.
    Thanks,
    Lokesh

    No answers yet

  • COPA report value wrong

    Hi Gurus,
    I have write a copa report , i have assigned in  KE4I sd condition type to value filed, so +/- are assigned in PR00 and VPRS condition typs ..still i am getting wrong value ..ie Reversal document value also add to the report  ex billing document Rs 2500 and reversal document Rs 2400/- but in COPA report value is  Rs 4900/-  why and where my config or report was wrong
    let me know.
    Regards
    Vinu

    Hi
    Presently in costing sheet there are two continuous processes, both are considered as SFG (semi finished goods). The SFG 1 material in first process is the BOM part of the second process SFG 3 material. Both process has different cost centres, overheads and cost elements.
    Now the second process of SFG material takes more than 9 months. So want to show this WIP under maturation stock, as separate stock under new SFG 2 material, with some value addition (considered as activity). This new process related SFG 2 material BOM will contains the first process SFG 1 material. And this new SFG 2 material code will be the part of BOM of the last process SFG 3 material.
    Now there are 1 issues we are facing.
    1st query:
    In quality server after transporting the request from Development, Price difference account is generated while production of the 3rd Process SFG 3 material.
    Production made for 1000 AL Qty (Base Qty of BOM 1000 AL and Costing lot size 1000 AL ) and in the entry we are getting the Price difference entry as shown below.
    Dr. Inventory SFG3 - 105,897.43
    Cr. Incr/Decr/Cons SFG 3 - 105,900.00
    Cr. Price difference - 2.57
    Cr. Inventory SFG2 - 94,550.00
    Dr. Incr/Decr/Cons SFG2 - 94,550.00
    Standard cost of SFG 3 for 1000 AL is 105,897.43 and Standard cost of SFG 2 for 1000 AL is 94,550.00
    May i know why the price difference account is picked up while doing the production of existing material SFG 3, when there is no such difference in development server. And no Price difference account in Quality server before introducing the new process?
    Regards
    Vinu

  • RA values in COPA report

    Hi,
    In COPA report, we get cumulative figure of both actual revenue and the RA figures either Rev in excess billings or Revenue surplus in the Revenue value field. But, we would like to show in the copa report, what is the actual revenue and the values against Revenue in excess billings and Revenue surplus seperately.  I have explored and but could not find any clue. If any of you met this type of requirement and appreciate if you can share with this agust forum.
    Regards!!

    Hi
    I try...
    Basically you need to create two line IDs in my case these were:
    T70 POC Sales
    T71 T Sales
    In OKG5 I linked all revenue costelements to T70 with requirement to capaitalize. No assignement has to be made to T71.
    In OKG4 (Update for LineIDs), I added both, T70 and T71, with category E "revenues" and two different costelements. In the appropriate PA Transfer Structure I added the costelements to the correct value field (either POC sales or sales).
    In enhancement KKAG0001 I used exit EXIT_SAPLKKAG_001 and include ZXKAGU01. Coding (in extracts as we do other stuff within this user exit):
      DATA: lt_sume   TYPE TABLE OF xkabasis WITH HEADER LINE.
      DATA: lt_sumd   TYPE TABLE OF xkaabgr WITH HEADER LINE.
      DATA: BEGIN OF ls,
             soll TYPE istkumkg,
             sollp TYPE istkumkg,
             sollc TYPE istkumkg,
             ist  TYPE istkumkg,
             diff TYPE istkumkg,
            END OF ls.
      CLEAR ls.
      LOOP AT import_basis WHERE kateg = 'E'.
        lt_sume = import_basis.
        CLEAR: lt_sume-zlnid, lt_sume-bewkz.
        COLLECT lt_sume.
      ENDLOOP.
      READ TABLE lt_sume INDEX 1.
      READ TABLE import_abgrenzun WITH KEY zlnid = 'T70'.
      ls-ist                     = import_abgrenzun-abgrkumkg.
      ls-sollp                   = ls-soll - lt_sume-istkumkg.
      ls-sollc                   = ls-soll + ls-sollp.
      ls-diff  = ( ls-ist - ls-sollp ) * - 1.
      export_veraender-abgty     = 'D'.
      export_veraender-zlnid     = 'T70'.
      export_veraender-abgrverkg = ls-diff.
      APPEND export_veraender.
      ls-diff                    = lt_sume-istkumkg.
      export_veraender-abgty     = 'D'.
      export_veraender-zlnid     = 'T71'.
      export_veraender-abgrverkg = ls-diff.
      APPEND export_veraender.
    With this POC and real sales are splitted to T70 and T71.
    I hope this helps!
    Best regards
    Benjamin

Maybe you are looking for