Copying Header level Billing Plan to Item Level Billing Plan

Hi Gurus,
I have the following Business Scenario:
I am creating Sales Order with reference to contract. In the sales order item level detail, a check box(Copy Header level Billing Plan to item level Billing Plan) is checked. For my Business Scenario, I do not want this check.
Could you please help me in making the configuration changes to remove this check box.
Regards,
Nish

Dear
I hope just try once
When you assign Copy Header level Billing Plan to item level Billing Plan That header level billing plan data also will come to item level it means you can change in item level
if you dont want this function in item level -- Billing plan ..Just remove the check box
Then you cant find please try it and let me know
Thanks a lot
venu

Similar Messages

Delivery & Billing Block at Item level in Sales Order ( Urgent)

HI All,
I am getting delivery & Billing block at item level when I create an order with config material.
And I am unable to remove the blocks manually since they appear in display mode even in change mode of sales order.
but I could see a biiling document for this order in document flow with 0 value.
Note:
1. The item does not have any reason for rejection
2. Ther is no block set at schedule line category too.
Please give me your valid suggestion as soon as possible since it is production issue.
Thanks & Regards

Hi Chandra,
Please try with this
Run VKM5 transaction with that delivery
I hope it will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Delivery & Billing block at item level when I create order with config mat

HI All,
I am getting delivery & Billing block at item level when I create an order with config material.
And I am unable to remove the blocks manually since they appear in display mode even in change mode of sales order.
but I could see a biiling document for this order in document flow with 0 value.
Note:
1. The item does not have any reason for rejection
2. Ther is no block set at schedule line category too.
Please give me your valid suggestion as soon as possible since it is production issue.
Thanks & Regards

Dear chandrashekar,
Goto VOV8 , select your order type - Billing - Billing block - keep this field as blank .
Second one , take the default billing type in order type (VOV8) , and Goto OVV4 and click on selection criteria and select billing type , enter your billing type and choose , you will now get the listing of that biling type and check your settings are correct.
saravanan

Billing block at item level still billing is possible for the item.

Hi friends,
I have billing blocks at header and item level. When the block at the header and item levels are active no billing takes place, but if the block at header is removed then an item with a billing block is also billed. How do i stop this ? Please suggest.
Regards,
Udaynath.

Rectified. It was wrong copying requirement at the item level.
Regards,
Udaynath.

Customer exit for tab 'Billing Plan' at item level in VA02

Hi gurus,
is there any customer or user exit for tab 'billing plan' in va02 where we find other tab like SALE A, SALES B, SHIPPING etc, i allready tried mv45afzz (userexit_field_modification) and exit V60F0001( Cmod). the requirement is to suppress field NET VALUE for certain user n based upon sale order type. so i cant use transaction variant.
well i found one include "RV60FUS4" which contain form 'userexit_field_modification' but i dont know how to change the code n through which user exit.
any reply will be awarded.
thanks

well include "RV60FUS4" which contain form 'userexit_field_modification' worked with development key from sap.
thanks

Copy of Attachments at Item Level and Replicate the order with Attachment

Dear Frnds,
Here i have two questions ,
1) I want to copy the attachments from Quotations to Sales Orders Item Level , it is possible at header level.Is there any way i can copy from Document to Document at Item Level.I tried copy control of item level its not working.
2) After Sales order replication from CRM to ECC i should be able to see that Attachment in ECC.
Please give your valuable inputs.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
RR

We have been trying to do this for about 6 months now. I am told that you can not replcate an attachment from CRM to ECC, the best you can do is send an email from CRM with the document attached.
Karin

Making vendor down payment at PO header level and not item level

Hi
I am making downpayment to vendor. I am using new functionality in EHP 4 for making downpayment through purchase order. When I run ME2DP for making downpayment, it asks for PO item number also.
But my requirement is to pay downpayment at PO header level and not PO item level.
Please let me know how can I do payment at PO header level.

Dear All,
I am also facing the same problem. Though Advance is maintained in PO Header Level when we are trying to create DP Request / DP system is asking line item mandatory. Suppose i have 2 line items and maintain all the DP amount in first line item. I am making service entry for 2nd line item and bill for the second line item. Then in this case, the Down Payment clearing tab doesn't appear in MIRO. That means I am unable to adjust the advance for the line item though I have to adjust it.
Problem is that there are more than 300 lines items in PO/WO. Hence it becomes difficult to maintain advance for each line or the user is forced to maintain certain amount in line item..
Please help ..Its urgent
Regards,
Ganesh

Header condition type should not be editable at item level

Hi gurus,
could you please help me with the following question.
Our requirement is to provide header discounts manually at header level which should not be editable at item level. So I've created condition type as Header condition.
When we manually add this condition at header level in Sales order, it is copied to the item level and is not editable there.
But after saving the SO, we find that the header discounts appearing at the item level becomes editable.
Kindly advice how to make the condition type as non-editable at item level.
Thanks in advance.
Sunny.

hi Sunny,
please check your condition type for discount in section 'Changes which can be made', wheather it used only for the header level or item level or both of it.
if you want to make the condition is not editable in item level, then you must made the condition type just for the header level.
beside changing the configuration in the condition type, you can protect it via BADI but it needs more programming.
if you insist to use the BADI, you can made the implementation of class CRM_ORDER_FIELDCHECK BADI
hopes it helps
cheers

I am required to trigger billing output to at item level (normally SAP

I am required to trigger billing output at item level which means one billing document sends more than one billing output for each line item (normally SAP does it at header level ).How do I go about this? Is there any user exit I can manipulate to trigger RSNAST00---->I found an exit in RVCOMFZZ- USEREXIT_KOMKBV3_FILL ..this subroutine is called before printing>...
I have not much clue how to go about this ?
Any Help on this would be highly appreciated.
Thanks
Shankar.

Hi Shankar,
how about an own output program? That can be triggered on header level, but can create outputs on item level.
Otherwise: looks difficult to get line level trigger, if SAP hasn't it up to now.
Regards,
Christian

Deletion of the Purchase order at the item level and header level

Hi Gurus,
We are using SRM 7.0 system.
In standard SRM 7.0, the PO can be deleted at header level and at line item level. I need to know the differnce between these deletions. I found that if the PO is deleted at the line item level the deletion indicator (DEL_IND) field in BBP_PDIGP table is 'X'.
But i could not find any clue to find the PO which is deleted at the header level. I need to code this logic in a report .
Kindly provide your valuable inputs.
Thanks,
RK

There are two ways:
1. From the Header by clicking the DELETE button. And this is only possible when the PO is not yet output to Vendor.
2. The second way is to delete all the items in the PO. This is possible any time irrespective of the output sent to the vendor. But provided if there are no follow-on documents for this.
Some times we could see the Deletion icon active in Header , it is because there is change version existing.
When a PO is created and ordered, this is the first version of the PO. And this PO is sent to the backend and output is sent to
the vendor.
Now when you make a change and hold it, SRM creates the 2ndversion of this PO. Then when you delete this PO, SRM marks this 2nd
version of PO to closed. Also you receive the pop-op confirmation that PO was deleted at this point. However, this PO deletion is never sent to the backend and output is not sent to the vendor since this PO has never been ordered. This version is the Change Version. This is shown after the PO number field if you pay attention on the screen.
When you search for the PO, it will show you the ordered PO (No change version shown after the PO number). The system does not show you the deleted version which is version 2. That is why you see status is 'ordered'.

Migo is not showing the excise tab - header level and item level

Hi,
i have created one PO with excise and i have created MIGO with only capture excise invoice, in MIGO before saving the document system is showing the excise basic, cess and higher education cess in excise tab, header level as well as item level. After saving the document, if i go to dispaly view of the MIGO document system is not showing the header level as well as item level excise amount. The tab itself is not appearing. Can any one help me on this.

Hi,
There are two kinds of statuses, system status and user status.
You can only influence System status if you execute a business transaction that changes the system status.there
are four system statuses open, In process,Released and Completed.
User status can be created as additional information to the system status in any numbers.But for this you
need to define a status profile which would further be assigned to transaction type(header status) and
item categories(item status).
The header status is independent of the item status. One exception is the status Completed.
If all items have the status Completed, the header status is also set to Completed.
For defining a status profile you need to go to
SPRO>Customer Relationship Management>Transactions>Basic settings>Status Management.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Sidd

Pricing : Frieght calculation - differentiate Header and Item level

Dear friends,
I have a requirement wherein I have to find the sum of the gross weight of all line items at header level and round off the value to the next 500 gms.This value will be shown at the Header Conditions tab in the condition record ZFRD.
The rounding off should not happen at the item level (i.e in Item - Conditions tab ).
I have developed a base type for this.But at the configuration level, the group condition and item condition are checked, Hence the rounding off works at the header as well as the ITEM level.
Can anyone suggest me if there is any field which differentiate between header and item calculation.
So that I can check that field and restrict the pricing only to the header level.
i am trying this functionality at pricing procedure level by creating a new formula for condition base value and passing gross weight to XKWERT field.
Thanks in Advance!!!!

Hi
Have you tried to save a document and check what you can see for that condition?
I think the header value is being transfered to the item while you're debugging
When you'tr header level PRICING_COMPLETE should be called
Max

Partner Functions Mandatory in Header and Item Level

Hi Guys,
I want to Make Some Partner Functions as a Manatory in Header and Item Level,How to make it configure,Please give me
the solution.

hi,
please go to VOPA and select :
after configuring the set up PD for customer master.
then check the second and third ones
FOR HEADER LEVEL:
GOTO SPRO - SD - set up partner determinatin procedure- set up PDP for sales document header & select your PARTNER DETERMINATION PROCEDURE & goto partner functions in procedure and SELECT WHICH PARTNERS TO APPEAR AS MANDATORY & CHECK whether they are appearing in document header or not.
FOR ITEM LEVEL:
GOTO SPRO - SD - set up partner determinatin procedure- set up PDP for sales document ITEM LEVEL & select your PARTNER DETERMINATION PROCEDURE & goto partner functions in procedure and SELECT WHICH PARTNERS TO APPEAR AS MANDATORY & CHECK whether they are appearing in document item level or not.
balajia

Sales Orders - Item level partners

Hi Experts,
Say, suppose the sales order_1 has 2 line items. First item will be shipped to SH_1 and 2nd is to SH_2. So, I am aware of this scenario.
Pls. let me know, Is there any other scenarios(meaning, other than Ship-To-Party), where each line item is having different partners(obviuosly, different from Header partner) in real time? Wht scenarios demands to hv different partners at item level? pls. let me know.
thanq

got it, thanq.
i will put my question in another way:
In perspective of Sold-To:
Header Sold to = sold_to_X
item 10 Sold to = sold_to_Y
item 20 Sold to = sold_to_Z
In perspective of Bill-To:
Header Bill to = bill_to_XX
item 10 Bill to = bill_to_YY
item 20 Bill to = bill_to_ZZ
Plls. let me know,
1) Is this combination is possible?
2) if so, Who is physical Sold-To partner/party for Item 10, Is it Headers sold_to_X or items sold_to_Y? (bcoz, as per my knowledge, the Header data is applicable to all its items by default !!)
3) if so, Who is physical BILL-To partner/party for Item 20, Is it Headers bill_to_XX or items bill_to_ZZ?
thanq

SECess in ARE1 not getting populated at Item level

Hi,
I am creating ARE1 based on outgoing excise invoice. In my outgoing excise invoice all excise duties are getting populated at Header level & also at item level.
but in my ARE 1 document SECess is coming at header level only & not at item level, other excise duties are populated at both level header & Item.
Is there any one who can guide me in this matter.
Thanks & Regards,
Savi Salvi

Hi Savi
Since you say you have maintained all the necessary settings, check if you are able to see the S E Cess in the Display mode of the ARE1 (A03 Display - R10 Display ARE1 Internal Document)
Even I have faced the same situation where all the calculations are in place but somehow I cant see the S E Cess in the Create mode. Since this was available in the 'Display' mode, I have not paid much attention. Nonetheless, I have asked my Technical Consultant to have a look at it again (same issue I faced in J1IIN and if I recall correctly, he could make the Cess appear).
Ramana N D

Copying Header level Billing Plan to Item Level Billing Plan

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for