Cost Center in actual assessment

Hi all,
I am trying to get a report which shows for a specific cost center the actual assesment cycle in whic it is assigned in a massive way. I know I can find it via KS03 but only for a specific cost center, does anyone know a massive way to do this? I found the program RKALLOOK but this is an individual one.
Thanks a lot in advance

Hi
You have two options.
(1) Use RKALLOOK and look-up one cost center at a time (I believe you are already aware about it).
(2) I am going to suggest an option at a database level. Use transaction code SE16 on table T811K. On the selection screen for this table use TABLE = CCSS, FIELD = KOSTL, FROM VALUE (Enter all the Cost Centers). One thing to remember is that this table stores cost centers as 10 characters long. So if your cost center nomenclature is shorter prefix the value with Zero. Example, cost center 12345 will be 0000012345.
Program RKALTOOL provides a list of all the allocation relevant tools at one place and RKALLOOK is the only program out there.
Regards

Similar Messages

Cost center + Activity actual consumed quantity report

Dear Friend,
I want to see acitivities actual conumption (operation confirmation by PP) quantity with the combination of cost centers. Please provide me some reports number.
thanks
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
try S_ALR_87013646 - Activity Types: Period Breakdown
S_ALR_87013647 - Activity Types: Scheduled/Plan
S_ALR_87013617 - Area: Activity Types
S_ALR_87013629 - Activity Types: Reconciliation
S_ALR_87013630 - Activity Types: Plan Receivers
KSBT - Cost Centers: Activity Prices
KL20 - Template Allocation Structure: Cost Center/Activity Type
Hope this helps you....
Regards,
Sreekanth....

Table for cost center plan/actual data

Hello gurus,
What are the tables to get for cost center wise plan/ actual data? The data which was entered through KP06 was sitting in whcih table?
regds
ramachandra

Hello Ramachandra,
Actual and Plan Data can be found in COVP view.
1) For Actuals, you should use the values 04 and 11 to the field WRTTP;
2) For Plans, you should use the values 01 and 10 to the field WRTTP.
If you need to get the totals, you should use tables COSP and COSS.
Hope this help you.
Cheers,
Daniel.

Cost Center Plan/Actual/Commitment

Hi
Want to Devlop a customized report for Cost Center where I need to display Plan/Actual/Commitments vaues for a cost center fiscal Year per period year wise.
Let me know which, tables I can use to get these values as COSS and COSP not shows values Period wise.
regards,
Atul Rajmane

Hi,
I am able to get required the data from COSS and COSP tabel.
While going through COSS-OBJNR number I am getting my required cost center have Object number as KLZPG1F010000105CR0021 where ZPG is my Controlling area and 1F010000105 is a cost center.
But, I unable to get it meaning of KL and CR0021 in this string.
Let me know what it means so that I can form my object as required above to get deatils from COSS table.
regards,
Atul Rajmane

Cost center Group & Assessment cycle

We are running CC reports for CC groups X and Y - Report GR55, Report group 1000 - Run in both currencies Pesos and USD by running in both currency modes.
Requirement:
1) How can we see the net balance in CC reports after assessments out = 0 in both Pesos and USD currencies.
2) Where we can see the link between Cost center Group and Assessment cycle.
Thanks,
Raju

Hi,
1) You will see the credit entries in the report after the assessment is run. Here, report should have configured in such a way, you can see both debit and credit entries.
2) If you have assigned the KSB1 Actual cost line report to the report, you can doubte click and see from which cost centers the values have flown through assessment.
Trust this helps much!
Cheers!

Cost Center Assessment - cost element type 42

Hi dear All,
I got issues running KSU5 to allocate planned costs under cost element type 42. we were expecting that all planned costs (primary and secondary(cost element type 42)) could be allocated by credit cost center (actual). only primary costs are being allocated.
Scenario:
cost center planning (kp06) 1000 currencies in primary cost element in cost center A
running planning assessment - KSUB: cycle uses assessment cost element (type 42): sender cost center A, receiver cost center B (all planned values). assessment cyles posts 1000 currencies from CC A to cost center B
planning in cost center B (primary cost elements through kp06, 500 currencies) total planning 1000 from previous assessment with CE type 42, and 500 from cc planning in a primari CE.
by the period end closing, tcode KSU5 (allocation actual) is running. new cycle created, based on planned values (origini not actual, but planned amounts).
we were expecting to allocate 1500 currencies from cost center B to cost center C (using 100% and through assessment cost element)).
result: credit actual cost center B = 500 currencies debit actual cost center C = 500 currencies.
1000 currencies pending on cost center B (planned).
do you know why SAP is not allocating the 1000? even if those 1000 were planned in cost center B by assessement, a new allocation cycle should be able to post them or not?
thank you for your outcome.

Hi dear Ajay, thank you for your answer.
first, I understand the difference between KSUB and KSU5, in the defined scenario, we have both. planned values, become actual with the MEC activities. business definition.
regarding the cycle, I have setup assessment cost element so we can get all planned lines posted as 1.
On sender tab I have only the cost center. no cost element defined.
receiver its cost center.
furthermore, i've not setup allocation structure, so all cost elements should be allow, there is no restriction on this.
the only difference is: planned costs which their origin is already an assessment are not being assessed again.
I can show you the print screens with cycles setup if it helps
best regards
MF

Over Absorption in Production Cost Center.

Dears,
We are getting the over absorption in cost center after doing of actual price calculation settlement. we have done the following transactions at month end. eventhough we are getting over absorption (i.e., credits are more than debits) Credits are activity costs are transferred from production cost center to production/process orders or product collectors.
KO8G settlement of internal orders to cost centers.
KSV5 execution of distribution cycle.
KSII execution of actual price calculation.
CON2 revaluation at actual prices.
CO88 Settlement of Production/Process Orders.
Even after doing of the above trnasactions we are getting over absorption.
kindly advise me in order to resolve this issue.

Hi Divraj,
The same issue i am replicating in the development server i created one assessment cycle i gave one service cost center as sender and one cost element group, the group contains 10 primary cost elements(GL's), i done postings with 10 gl's respect to this service cost center, in my assessment cycle i gave one assessment cost element in segment header the sender rule is posted amounts, the receiver tracing factor contains variable portions, actual activity and no scaling, in receiver i gave cost center group contains 4 production cost centers, sender values is share in 100%, version is zero the receiver tracing factor tab contains variable portions as actual activity and one activity i maintained, the receiver weighting factor contains 4 production cost centers and factor percentage is 100%.
Now i execute the assessment cycle in KSU5 i am getting senders in cycle but receivers i am getting zero, when i took the actual activity, variable portions and no scaling i have to maintain activity price in KP26 and this cost center i have to maintain in process order that is fine please explain me how the cost will distributed to production cost center please explain the procedure in detailed.
Hopefully i will get clarity on the concept................

Actual Assessment and distribution cycles

Hi Guys:
I have gone through planning assessment cycles , their execution and activity rate calculation. Now i want to do actual cycles. I am confused about the starting point of actual cycles. I understand that service cost centers are the one which need to be apportioned to the receiving cost center. Service cost centers like Electricity have posting in them through FI and their accumulated cost needs to be apportioned to production cost center through actual run.For actual cycles to be executed what should be the starting point. Like in planning i started from KP06,did KSU7 and KSUB, then moved to KP26,did KSS4 and finally KSPI. This planned activity rate is supposed to be used in computing actual activity cost when actual quantities are confirmed from PP. Please guide me through the process.
Br
Moderator: Please, search before posting

Hi:
Thanks for reply. I did KSU1 and KSU5 , now at the time of test run KSS2, it showed me some warning messages as shown under
No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1301002/FOH
No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1301002/LABOR
No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1301002/VOH
Cost center CTR 1000/1301002, cost element ZSNPL: Tracing factor for splitting is zero
Cost center CTR 1000/1301002, cost element ZAINS: Tracing factor for splitting is zero
Cost center CTR 1000/1301002, cost element ZMISC: Tracing factor for splitting is zero
No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1303004/FOH
No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1303004/LABOR
No target costs in target cost version 0 - missing plan for ATY 1000/1303004/VOH
Cost center CTR 1000/1303004, cost element ZSNPL: Tracing factor for splitting is zero
Br

Cost center wise comparison between FI view and CO view

Hi,
I have one doubt regarding comparison of cost center in FBL3N and in in S_ALR_87013611.
Is there any report in from which I can compare Cost center wise actual spending in FBL3N versus some reports in CO?
I would appreciate if someone help me on this.
Thanks in advance!
Bhargav
Edited by: BHARGAV RASBIHARI PADHYA on Nov 17, 2010 6:10 AM

Hi Bhargav,
If I am not wrong you are taking about the comparison of cost centres values in Co to Cost centre Values in FI.
If this is the case, then its a pain compiling the values. Because, when values flow from FI to CO then dont come to one cost centre, they are spread accross various cost centres where they are incurred.
For Example : You may debit P&S GL account for 10000, but the cost centres involve this expenditure this can be from different cost cetres like from Finance, Marketing, Retail etc.
Now if you want to compare the cost ccentre values with the FI and COthen you can imagine the work and time involved in it.
Let me know if anyone have any different views on this.
Regards,
Mallikarjun

Display cost center in FBL3N

I want to display cost center information in GL line item report
(FBL3N).I choose new layout with additional column: order and cost
center.My problem is only order will display the information while no
details in cost center column.How do i display my cost center?
For your information, all line items related to this problem are come
from work order created by PM module which is using internal order and
settlement rule to cost center.
Regards
shivanand

i am taking a shot in the dark, when you have a document that has both internal order and cost center.
the actual posting goes to the internal order and the cost center only has statistical posting.
I dont know, if this could cause an issue.
check the respective cost center line items, i am sure they should show statistical.
why dont you arrive at these postings from KSB1, give a cost center range or any hierarchy

Block cost center

Hi
can any one tell me how to block the cost center for company code .(for only one company code)
thanks,
sami

Hi,
Please go to KS02. In Control Tab Page, You can lock the cost Center for
Actual Primary Cost
Actual Secondary Cost
Actual Revenues
Plan Primary Cost
Plan Secondary Cost
Plan Revenues
I hope it found useful to you.
Regards,
Jigar

Cost center effect to budget posting- urgent-please help

Dear expert,
What is the effect in create new cost center to actual /budget posting in SAP?
Please somebody clear me about this issue
Thank you.

Hi
1. In Transaction code KPZ2
With reference to Controlling area and cost centre or cost centre group the perid wise budget can be define for each cost centre ( By select of periodic overview screen)
Note : The availability check is not available with this cost centre budget ( i.e. if the actual amount exceeds than budgeted amount it allowes to do the further transaction.)
Report S_ALR_87013648 -
Range:Actual/Budget/Commitments
will give the information of budget and actual amount.
2. Also in trasaction code KP06 it is possible to define cost centre and cost element plan amount without availability check.
Report S_ALR_87013611 - Cost Centers: Actual/Plan/Variance with give the information of Plan vs actual and variance
If the above answer is helpful kindly assign points
Thanks & Regards
Mahesh

Cost Center Assessment to Cost Hierarchy based on Actual Consumption error

Assessment is set up:
SENDER: Cost Center: Overhead Expenses (values in expense accounts)
RECEIVER: Top Node of Cost Object Hierarchy (material consumption has been posted to two objects - related account has value and quantity fields)
Segment is set up:
Sender Rules: Posted Amounts
Share:100%
Actual value origin
Receiving tracing factor:
Receiver rule: Variable Portions
Var. portion type: Actual Consumption
No Scaling
Assumption is that "Var. portion type: Actual Consumptions" means the quantity in the consumption account on the receiver from the inventory posting. Is this true?
Edited by: Chris Gibson on Apr 13, 2010 11:56 PM

Hi dear Ajay, thank you for your answer.
first, I understand the difference between KSUB and KSU5, in the defined scenario, we have both. planned values, become actual with the MEC activities. business definition.
regarding the cycle, I have setup assessment cost element so we can get all planned lines posted as 1.
On sender tab I have only the cost center. no cost element defined.
receiver its cost center.
furthermore, i've not setup allocation structure, so all cost elements should be allow, there is no restriction on this.
the only difference is: planned costs which their origin is already an assessment are not being assessed again.
I can show you the print screens with cycles setup if it helps
best regards
MF

Actual Assessment Cycle - Multiple Segments for one Cost Center

Dear experts,
I've got one very important (for me) question:
I want to distribute a cost centers (primary) cost in two ways - at the same time:
   First: as a fixed value to three other cost centers and
   Second: the remaining cost shall be distributed to all cost centers of a cost center group
                with an statistical key figure.
Is it possible to distibute the remaining cost after a first distribution??
If yes, how is the procedure to do so?
Thank you very much in advance.
Ralf

Hi Ralf,
It's certainly possible; just create two steps, one after another, and you will achieve your goal.
Regards,
Eli

Copa assessment from cost center posted with zero values

Hello all,
We are running for the first time in my clients system assessment cycle for actual values from cost center t copa
The cycle at the test run shows the values and the reciever tracing factor allright but in update run the document created with zero values
Can anyone adress me why this happnes
Thanks
Michal

Hi,
You must be getting some errors in update run, like profit center update (if new gl active) or other, please check and revert.
Br

Cost Center in actual assessment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for