Cost estimate component qty is zero

Dear experts,
I have one Raw material is assigned to many finished products,
When I try to calculate the cost estimates for the finished items,
The calculated qty for my raw material appears for some finished items and some is not appear (zero).
And I checked the BOM but everything is OK
If you have any idea please help me
Thanks in advance

thank you sir for answering me,
for my Raw Material (assume X) and for SF with good cost estimate  (assume G) ans for bad SF cost estimate (assume B),
G BOM base unit is 10 000 L
X qty in G BOM is 1.210 KG
B BOM base unit is 10 000 L
X qty in B BOM is 1.210 KG
the costing lot size qty is 1000
so, for G item the req, qty from X is ((1.210 KG / 10 000) * 1000 = 0.121) and it is appearing,
and for B item the req qty form X is ((1.210 KG / 10 000) * 1000 = 0.121) and it is not appearing

Similar Messages

  • CK11N (Cost estimate with qty structure) Set Up time calcualtion

    Greetings..
                      I have an following activity data for operation 10  with base qty 40.33 kg
    Op.10   Set Up Time    10 min
    Op. 10  Machine Time  20 min.
    Now for this material when i create Cost Estimate with qty structure (CK11N) for this material, i m getting the result of costing itemization for costing based on COSTING LOT SIZE as 1 kg
    Set Up time coming 10 min along with its cost.
    Op. Time coming 0.496 min along with its cost.
    But when i change costing based on USER ENTRY with entry equal to base qty of routing as 40.33 kg
    Set Up time coming 403.33 min along with its cost.
    Op. Time comming 20 min along with its cost.
    Why set up time is multiplied by USER ENTRY qty.
    It should give the set up time  as 10 Min for USER ENTRY  40.33 kg.
    Formula for Setup requirement is SET UP TIME (SAP005 = SAP_01)
    Edited by: SAP PP on Sep 15, 2009 2:22 PM
    Edited by: SAP PP on Sep 15, 2009 2:23 PM

    HI,
    Request you to check the Setup fromula in the work center Costing Tab screen. Also chech whether you are using any formula in the routing details in the User defined fields (which will be picked from the WORK center data.
    Hope this will help you.
    regards
    radhak mk

  • Material Cost Estimate with Qty Structure - Activity Cost

    Hi All
    While executing the Cost Roll up (CK11n) Im facing a peculiar problem . I have defined an activity for which the rates are also maintained in KP26 against the Basic UOM(eg for 1000 activity 10Rs is the variable price mentioned)  . When Im taking the min lot size say 1 for the costing run the quantity appearing against this activity is appearing in the lower UOM (taking actual gms but the value for this activity is appearing in rupees only calculating from activity price x this figure). This is making the whole activity cost on very higher side .whereas If I execute with the same factors but with big lotsize say 1000 the value for the activity is coming absolutely ok .
    Pls confirm me how to put a check on the value of activity or uom of activity to evaluate the standard costing with minimum lower size also
    Best Regards
    Manoj

    Im closing this thread

  • Cost estimate updation

    Hi there ,
                    I have done the material cost estimate with Qty structure in CK11n with costing variant PPC1..... It is done sucessfully .... now when I am trying to mark & release the same in CK24.... I am getting the log as Zero matarial & cost estimate updated....
    Please advice
    Regards
    Kaushik

    Dear,
    Your error seems from material master.
    Check following data are maintained or not.
    with qty structure is tick
    Do not cost should not tick
    Material origin is tick.
    Overhead Group is assign.
    Costing lot size.
    GOPAN.

  • Can't delete the cost estimate via CKR1

    Hi,
    We have one material. We can't delete the cost estimate via CKR1. It is only warning. It is no error log. The other material cost estimate can delete normally. I check the material master I can't find the issue. The following is the warning message. Could you pls help check it? Whate factor will effect the cost estimate deletion? Thanks.
    ==========================
    Deleting current standard cost estimates can cause inconsistencies
    Message no. CK 669
    Diagnosis
    u2022 If you delete a current standard cost estimate, the fields for
    the cost estimate are set to zero in the material master record. If you
    use the material ledger, the standard prices in the material ledger
    master data are also deleted when you delete the current standard cost
    estimate. The material master record for the material thus does no
    longer contains a current standard price from a standard cost estimate.
    u2022 If you delete an active standard cost estimate, you can no
    longer determine scrap, work in process and variations for previous
    periods.
    u2022 In certain countires, it is a legal requirement to maintain
    records of standard pricing. Therefore, you should check whether you
    are obliged by law to keep records of your standard cost estimates.
    Please also contact the relevant accounting and inventory management
    departments.
    ==========================
    Best Regards
    Park Han

    Hi,
    The deletion of Current standard cost estimate should be followed with some rules of the IFRS.
    If you want to change the standard cost you can do the change,If you want to delete the standard cost of material then it will set the price of material to zero.If the material ledger also activate then it will make the Moving average price & standard cost of the material to zero.
    So follow the Law of the country & Discus with Audit team &then delete the curent standard cost estimate of the material.
    Regards,
    Raj

  • Cost estimate creation

    Dear all..
    Our client does not require product costing.
    He just intrested to run <b>Cost estimates with Qty. Structure </b> i.e.CK11N.
    I just want to know what settings are required for that..from start to end.... from controlling area settings to costing sheet if required..
    It will be better if anybody will provide configuration links or guides..

    Hi,
    Your requirement is not very clear.
    However, from what I understand your client does not want to use the functionality of Product Costing beyond the generation of the Standard Cost estimate thru Product Costing.You can generate Standard Cost Estimates without needing to create the PP Master data (BOM, Routing, Master Recipe) as follows:
    1) Enter the plan price in the Plan Price 1 field and execute a CK11N using the appropriate costing variant.
    As long as there is no integration with PP/PP-PI on the material master record the system will create "material" cost estimates.
    Regards,
    Assign points if useful.

  • FG Valuation basis - Std Cost estimate or Net sale value whichever is less

    Dear SAP Experts,
    Query 1 -
    Valuation of  Finished goods is done on basis of standard cost estimate (CK24) or Net sale value whichever is less 
    *Net sale value u2013 Net sales ( Sales value  minus Sales deductions)
    Eg : Std cost estimate gives FG price as $100, whereas Net sale value price of FG $80,
          now the client wants FG values should be at $80
    Is there any standard way,  wherein SAP can capture whichever is less i.e standard cost estimate vs Net Sale Value
    Pl let us know the options and which options would be ideal for query 1
    Query 2 u2013 Can we use CRK1 and MR21 to manually change FG price whenever Net sale value is less than std cost estmate price?
    u2022     In case the market value is less than the std cost estimate (CK11n) ,then Is this the approach to manually value FG price using  CRK1 & MR21. 
    u2022     What could be the impacts if we follow this approach
    For Eg: Impact on prev months WIP, Scrap, stock returns etc
    u2022     We simulated CRK1 & MR21 and MR21 entries are posted successfully, however following below warning is the message is showed when CRK1 is executed
                 Note u2013 Material Ledger is not active
    Warning Message
    Deleting current standard cost estimates can cause inconsistencies. Your comments please
    Message no. CK669
    Diagnosis
    u2022     If you delete a current standard cost estimate, the fields for the cost estimate are set to zero in the material master record. If you use the material ledger, the standard prices in the material ledger master data are also deleted when you delete the current standard cost estimate. The material master record for the material thus does no longer contains a current standard price from a standard cost estimate.
    u2022     If you delete an active standard cost estimate, you can no longer determine scrap, work in process and variations for previous periods.
    u2022     In certain countries, it is a legal requirement to maintain records of standard pricing. Therefore, you should check whether you are obliged by law to keep records of your standard cost estimates. Please also contact the relevant accounting and inventory management departments.

    Dear,
    Query 1;
    The FG or SFG will be valuated at Standard Cost there is no provision to enter Net sale value
    Query 2:
    Do not user CKR1 to delete Cost Estimate because it can bring lot of Descripenceies in CO, SAP do not recommend the same.
    You can run the revaluation at the month end or revise your activity rates so that you standard price will be change accordingly and your inventory will be re valuated.
    Hope it is clear, it not then please revert.
    Br,Vivek

  • Cost component not splitting at the time of Rune the tine of Cost Estimate

    http//
    Hi,
    We are in developing phase for Product costing for coal mine project ,
    we have raise coal material with Non component BOM , and Routing is only one activity with 400- Raised Coal Qty-MT ,
    We upload the plan with Production cost center -activity type and cost element ( as per cost component -we have 10 cost component  as per below )
    RM - Blasting
    Production Overhead
    Power - Main
    Stores,Spare,Consum
    Repairs & Maint
    Lease & Hire Char-PM
    Power - Auxiliary
    Depreciation
    Over Burden
    Development
    we done the plan for Amount and Qty by KP06,KP26  and update plan price but system not calculate the cost component splitting in cost estimate as per planning while only one item showing for all cost to Production Overhead cost component
    Production Overhead cost component which assign the secondary cost element which is assign to activity type 400
    can any one help me to how we can resolve this issue
    Please find attached document

    Hi,
    Here I am providing the necessity and importance of splitting structure, will share the configuration steps once you go through the following and get the comfort level.
                        Expense Analysis and Splitting in Manufacturing Cost Centers
    Introduction In SAP Cost center work as a cost responsibility center, where all the expenses and cost are stored and analyzed for the purpose of management decision making.
    The cost could be fixed or variable in nature. The difference between variable and fixed costs can be made in various ways in product costing in CO module.
    Fixed costs represent the static costs incurred by the organization, which doesn’t change on the basis on manufacturing activities, which remain constant irrespective of production activities like rent for the premises, salaries of office staff etc.
    On the other hand, variable cost varies based on the level of production activities; if production activities increase then variable cost also increased like electricity consumes raw material charges etc.
    However all the variable cost doesn’t vary in direct proportion by quantity of goods produced.
    In this document will try to define; how the Expenses analysis and splitting of cost done in manufacturing cost centers.
    From controlling prospective, fixed cost remain constant regardless of operating activities, but if these factor changes, variable cost will fluctuate.
    Basically raw material costs represent variable cost, but in this document main focused will be given to distinguish fixed and variable activity cost.
    The segregation between fixed and variable cost is optional and is derived from the configuration and master data configured in cost center accounting and overhead accounting.
    Activity Price:
    There are different methods that could be used in cost center accounting to determine the activity price. The simple way is the manually enter “Fixed” and “Variable” Activity cost (KP26).
    However there are other methods used in Cost center Planning and Budgeting that automatically calculate the fixed and variable activity price.
    Here the focused will be given on Planning and Budgeting activity and automatic calculation of plan activity rate in cost center.
    This method aggregate planned costs by cost element and capacity by plan unit to calculate the activity price.
    Activity independent costs are segregated among different activities based on Splitting Structure, while activity dependent cost directly used for the purpose of variable activity rate calculation.   
    Fixed Activity Cost:
    In product costing all those cost, which doesn’t vary based on the activities in manufacturing cost will represent fixed cost.
    In a manufacturing cost centers there may be two or more activities performed.
    To calculate the activities rate, the fixed costs are distributed to various activities on the basis of Splitting Structure defined for cost center.  
    Variable Activity Cost:
    Variable activity cost, which directly depend upon the activity type and fluctuate based on increase or decrease in manufacturing activities. In SAP variable activity cost are directly linked to the respective activity.
    Activity Prices: Fixed and Variable Split
    In Cost Center Accounting dividing the cost between Fixed and Variable requires appropriate split to be made in the cost entered for the activity. The process is described below:
    i.  Variable cost would be planned at activity level and expenses should be maintained at cost element in the manufacturing cost center by assigning activity and cost element combination.
    In other word, the expenses should be planned on Activity type at the time of primary cost planning (KP06).
    Then the variable activity rates are calculated on Total cost planned at Activity divided by Total number of activity planned at that cost center (i.e. capacity in KP26)
    ii. Fixed cost would be planned at independent of activity type. These costs are maintained in KP06 at cost element level on manufacturing cost center.
    Then the fixed costs are distributed on various activity types on the basis of Splitting structure defined at OKEW.
    In Splitting Structure we define the rules, how the fixed cost will be distributed to Activities. For the purpose of this document, considering split of fixed cost on the basis of Capacity maintained in KP26.
    Regards,
    Pavan kumar Arvapally

  • Bom Component qty & WIP Quantity differ at Trget cost calculation

    Dear gurus,
    i am facing the problem with WIP at target cost calculation in REM.
    My issue is
    BOM Component qantity is 9.524 TO  and price is 2000 then total cost is  9.521*2000=19048.
    but in WIP Report kkas in WIP explation it takes input qty 9.52 T0 and price 2000 then total price is 19040.
    Difference is 19048 - 19040 =8
    and also when i am issuing actual qty i.e 9.524 in BOM then my price is 19048.00 ant at time of variance calculaton then quantaty variance as   9.52.0-9.524.0=-0.04  then 0.004*2000 =-8 
    Please suggest solution for this.
    Any OSSS NOTE Required
    any Quires please revert back
    REGARDS
    Avinash.pegarlawar

    Hi
    Rounding differences between target and actual values and quantities are not unlikely to occur and cannot always be avoided but can be minimized.
    Small prices and price unit of 1 are likely to cause more of these rounding differences..
    The actual credit is simply calculated as price * quantity. The target credit however is calculated during the variance calculation
    and based on the sum of all items in the itemization/cost components of the cost estimate and therefore more accurate.
    To avoid this I suggest to store the material price with a larger price unit, i.e. 1000
    Std cost release stores price upto 2 decimals and target cost calculation goes upto 3 decimals...
    Please check also the note 1265918 for more information to this topic.
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Target cost qty  is zero

    hi all :
    Can any body tell me target cost qty  is zero Reason ?  for Production order Cost Analysis   .

    thank you sir for answering me,
    for my Raw Material (assume X) and for SF with good cost estimate  (assume G) ans for bad SF cost estimate (assume B),
    G BOM base unit is 10 000 L
    X qty in G BOM is 1.210 KG
    B BOM base unit is 10 000 L
    X qty in B BOM is 1.210 KG
    the costing lot size qty is 1000
    so, for G item the req, qty from X is ((1.210 KG / 10 000) * 1000 = 0.121) and it is appearing,
    and for B item the req qty form X is ((1.210 KG / 10 000) * 1000 = 0.121) and it is not appearing

  • Cost component in cost estimate

    Hi all,
    In cost estimate with quantity structure, costs assigned to one of my cost components do not appear in the correct group.
    This only happens for a group that should include semi-finished costs. The correspondance in the customizing is correctly made between the cost element and the cost component and when looking at itemization, the correct cost element is displayed but no cost component is shown.
    I assume the problem may arise from the fact that my finish product use elements from other cost component, e.g. raw material, packaging,...
    Would someone have any idea on this issue?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Ronan

    Hi,
    Pls. used tcode CKMCCCC - Manual Change of Actual Cost Comp Split.
    Pls. assign points if it's helpful
    regards
    sel

  • Cost estimate less than zero

    hi
    i have a scenario
    where i get the free of cost material form customer
    i add the conversion,the scarp generated m
    if i use the scrap generated as credit the cost estimate is negative
    but i should bcz this is a sfg and it fits into aonther FG and the customer do concder the scrap generated credit during pricing
    but at the sfg level the cost estimate is negative.how to do this .

    maintain the Activity rates "zero" in KP26 for respective Cost center and Activity type.
    Material cost comes from Material master.....there we need to have zero price
    and try to run the CK11N, you have the chance to get the zero cost estimated.
    No idea how it works....do some R & D in DEV
    Thanks

  • Raw Material Cost Estimate - No split between cost component

    Dears,
    I need to execute a material cost estimate considering the Purchasing Info Record (PIR) where 3 different conditions are present:
    1) PB00
    2) FRB1
    3) RUC1
    The scope is:
    - linking PB00 to cost component 1
    - linking FRB1 to cost component 2
    - linking RUC1 to cost component 3
    Cost components are already created.
    I did following steps:
    - creation PIR with these 3 conditions (transaction ME11)
    PB00  10,00 EUR @ 1 KG
    FRB1   2,00 EUR @ 1 KG
    RUC1   3,00 EUR @ 1 KG
    - link condition types to origin groups (transaction OKYO)
    FRB1 linked to FRB1
    RUC1 linked to RUC1
    - link origin groups to cost component (transaction OKTZ)
    PB00, is linked to cost component 1 without origin group, but using only account coming from T030 table 
    FRB1 is linked to cost component 2 using origin group FRB1 and the same acocunt used for condition PB00 coming from T030 table
    RUC1 is linked to cost component 3 using origin group RUC1 and the same acocunt used for condition PB00 coming from T030 table
    At this moment, when I try to execute the cost estimate with transaction CK11N, the split is not done, and all condition types (all amounts) are linked to cost component 1. The set-up done in OKYO is not considered by the system.
    In the material master there's any origin group, if I try to fill in origin group FRB1 all condition types (all amounts) are linked to component 2, and if I try to change the origin group in the material master from FRB1 to RUC1, all condition types (all amounts) are linked to component 3 --> this means that the set-up done OKTZ is correctly considered by the system to link the origin group to the cost components.
    The problem is that the system reads the origin group from the material master, instead of transaction OKYO.
    How can I solve this problem?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Jody

    Pl verify following two things -
    Check valuation variant.
    Strategy sequence should have 'L - Price from purchasing info-record' and Sub-strategy should be 'A Quotation price via condition table' or 'B PO price via condition table'.
    OKYO setting should have valuation variant associated with your costing variant, along with other details (dont leave that field blank).
    Let us know if that works.
    Regards,
    Subodh

  • Display Dept. amount in Std cost estimate cost component view

    Dears,
    During implementation of Repetitive manufacturing, my customer Requirement is to have 4 activity types:
    1- Utilities : (Elect-water-GAS ... Etc)
    2- Labor : (salary - bonus ..Etc)
    3- Depreciation : (Depreciation exp)
    4- other : like (maintenance .. Etc)
    he wants that so he can know this classification of the above costs liek depreciation per material in the standard cost estimate so my question is:
    Is it applicable to display the above requirement and using only 2 activity types
    Labour and machine
    and use the cost component structure to display the above req ?
    as an example:
    in CK11N : if i switch to cost component view to display the depreciation amount and Etc
    Thanks and best Regards,
    Ahmed Samir

    Salaam Ahmad
    You have both choices.
    You can go with 4 act types or go with 2 and use costing sheet for the other costs
    I will prefer 4 act types
    Br. Ajay M

  • Cost estimate less tna zero

    hi
    i have a scenario
    where i get the free of cost material form customer
    i add the conversion,the scarp generated m
    if i use the scrap generated as credit the cost estimate is negative
    but i should bcz this is a sfg and it fits into aonther FG and the customer do concder the scrap generated credit during pricing
    but at the sfg level the cost estimate is negative.how to do this .

    Find it very hard to interpret the nature of issue you facing. If you can elaborate with more details or better still upload screenshots to some portal & paste the link here, will be helpful to understand. Also did you discuss this with your CO consultant?

Maybe you are looking for