Costing in case of ETO Scenario

Hi Experts,
We have ETO scenario. There is sales order with reference to project and absed on that production for In House Produced materials ( FG, HALB) and procurement for some HALB, Raw Material will happen.PS< moduel alongwith SD and PP are involevd in scenaio along with FICO and MM.
I am new to this area. I was looking for details of Costing of the project. How the production cost will be assigned to project?
How the execution of production happens..I mean whether we create production order or is there something else coming in picture in case of ETO ( Strategy -21) .
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
Presuming that your production is client order based. You have to use Sale order Costing and make sale order as cost object in the current scenario. As the Pipes are in different dimensions even Variant configuration will come into picture from Sales and Production Planning module.
When VC is used, there is a concept of Super BOM and Super routing in which all the relevant material and process required will be listed.
Specific coding will be written and assigned to the Master data in PP. When a specific requirement Sale order is create the required parameters are written on the Sale order VC screen.
In nut shell, from costing perspective you have to go with MTO scenario with Sale order costing. Then costing differs from Sale order to Sale order wherein there is not SCE updation to the FG material code.
Hope this trows some light on your doubts.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi Kumar

Similar Messages

GR in case of MTO scenario

Hello All
        In case of MTO (Planning strategy 20) when we run the MRP we have planned order agianst sales order & we convert planned order to Production order, I want to know that in case of MTO if we look at the GR tab page of the production order the GR Non-Valuated checkbox is ticked, & if we see the help of the same field it says:
Goods Receipt, Non-Valuated
Specifies that the goods receipt for this item is not to be valuated.
Dependencies
This indicator is only relevant to production orders, projects and and configurable materials with account assignment to a sales order.
      I want to know why this checkbox is checked in case of MTO.
      I want that this shall not be checkmarked in case of MTO scenario I want that if GR is done against a production order which is of MTO scenario, then GR shall be of valuated. Kindly suggest what all settings have to be done for the same.
Regards,
J K Tharwani

Thanks R Brahmankar for your valuable inputs,
         I did some changes in customizing under CO node of which the path is as under:
         SPRO>Controlling>Product cost controlling>Product cost by Sales Order>Control of Sales Order related Production-->Check requirement class.
        I made the changes in the following fields:
   Field                      Default Value               Changes
   Valuation               Blank                           M (Separate valuation with ref. to sales document/project)
   Settlement Profile   SD1                            PP01
Result analysis key 000004                       Blank
      After doing the above changes I created a sales order & did the MRP run I converted the planned order to production order & then I got under GR tab page of production order the check box for "GR Non-valuated" as unckecked. I want to cross check if the changes I have made are OK as per the requirement. Waiting for your valuable inputs.
Regards,
J K Tharwani

Credit Note in case of return scenario

Hi,
In case of return scenario, credit note is issued with reference to return order or return delivery?
I am unable to see the copy control setting in IDES for RE(Return Order) to G2(Credit Memo).
Could any one please let me know the setting for the same (Header and item).
Regards
Suman

Hi Suman,
As for the standard in the IDES,the Credit memo will be created with reference to the Creditmemeo request because of that RE to G2 copy control setting may not avail.
You copy the settings same as Creditmemo request(CR) to Credit memo (G2), You just change the name CR in to RE it will work.
-->Other wise you can use Credit for returns RE document type to create credit memo for return order RE for this copy control avail in the IDES t.code VTFA.
I hope it will help you
Regards,
Murali.
Edited by: Murali Mohan.T on Feb 27, 2008 11:07 AM

Cost distribution in Extended classic scenario

Hi All,
We are in SRM 4.0 using extended classic scenario.
When we create a purchase order with cost distribution, it gets copied to backend system. But the partial invoice field in backend PO is always having the value "Distribution in sequence".
In configuration for account assignment category, it has been defaulted to "Distribute proportionately".
When we checked with SAP they told that for SRM POs it will always be distribute in sequence. It has to be distributed while posting MIRO. This value is hardcoded in SRM PO transfer program. It is very strange and moreover this is a essential functionality which needs to be in SRM.
Any one using extended classic scenario, could you please tell me how you are handling multiple account assignments?
Please help me.
Thanks,
Arun

Friends,
If you are using cost distributions in extended classic scenario, then could you please check and let me know the value that you are getting in the "Partial Invoice" field in Account assignment tab of backend PO.
Please help.
Thanks,
Arun

How the raw material cost is picked in product cost in case of split materi

how the raw material cost is picked in product cost in case of split material in BOM

Hi
In case of Std cost (CK11N), the planned price or MAP that you enter in the Parent accounting View will be considered for the cost calcualtoin purpose
Parent view means the view which is above the 2 or more valuation types which consists of avg value of all other val types
Ajay M

CO - Cost per case report

Hi All,
Is there any standard report in SAP in which we can get the Cost per case and weighted average?
Case could be like pack of 12 bottles. If the production is 12000 bottles then the cases will be 1000 and cost per case will be 1000 X cost.
Thanks,
Syed Abid Hussain

Hey,
To my knowledge such a report does not exist in standard.
In this case a custom report should be written.
If the report should be related only to the total value (moving average or standard price), then you only need to take into consideration the MARM, MARA and MBEW table or using logical database MSM (creating a query).
Regards,
Koen

PP - order cost estimate in PP-PS scenario

Hello dear colleagues!
Where can I read about the plan and actual estimate material components for pp-order in pp-ps scenario?
In the settings specified sequence of assessment strategies material component. These strategies are clear to me.
As far as I know except for these strategies, the system applies more:
- price from the stock for WBSE;
- price from cost estimate for WBSE;
- other strategy.
From my point of view is correct, but I can not find descriptions and settings that change those strategies.
Can you help me?
Thank you for your attention

Found in the following scenario
FUNCTIONS "PRICE_STRATEGY_NEW" INCLUDE "LCK36FAZ":
1. Price from segment of WBS-Stock.
2. Price from USER-EXIT "EXIT_SAPLCK36_001".
3. Price from cost estimate for WBS-element.
4. Price from confirmation.
5. Plan price from PP-order forr material and same WBS-element.
I do not quite understand how the strategy 3 and 4.
Explain, please.

When will we go for Altova xml spy testing in case of soap scenario ??

Hi
suppose I have a scenario like this: rfc-xi-soap. In this scenario if somebody say's testing the scenario using Altova xml spy means Altova xml spy will be acting as webservice ?? what is the ( or is there) significance of below URL in testing ??
http://<host>:<j2ee-port>/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?
channel=<party>:<service>:<channel>
thanks
kumar

Hi Kumar
I am using XmlSpy for following reasons ::
*) To check & confirm the Request/Response/Fault Structure of the WebService.
*) To check the whether the WebService is UP or not, in case someone has reported an issue.
*) To develop the xsd structure for the WebServices, in case I am getting different structure after importing the WSDL in XI. Like in the case of this Weblog -->
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/03/23/rfc--xi--webservice--a-complete-walkthrough-part-1
In this response structure is created, you can also use other tools for creating xsd.
- Lalit -

No Accounting Document generated for goods issue in case of MTO scenario

Hi all,
I have MTO scenario & the industry is trading. So I have all trading goods. In SPRO - Sales & Distribution - Availability Check and Transfer of Requirements - Transfer of Requirements - Determination Of Requirement Types Using Transaction I have determined requirement type as KE.
In material master I have used strategy group as 20 for Make to order scenario. In the settings "Determination Of Requirement Types Using Transaction" I have determined the requirement type as "KE".
The requirement type "KE" determines a requirement class "040 - MkToOrdNoValW/o cons". Here the account assignment category is "E-Ind. cust. w. KD-CO".
Now I created a sales order, the system determined the requirement type as "KE". I saved the sales order, assigned the stock to the sales order & created a delivery.
I did the PGI also. But when I check in the document flow, for the material document the system has not generated any FI document where we see the accounting document for the "cost of goods sold" & "inventory" G/L accounts. The system gives a message "Material document 4900000023 does not include an accounting document".
Note:
1. When I create the sales order with normal MTS scenario, the system creates an accounting document for the material document at the time of goods issue.
2. The valuation class in the material is 3100 for trading goods.
3. The following settings have been made in OBYC.
for GBB, the G/L accounts have been assigned for general modifier "BSA", "VAX", "VAY" & "VKA".
Please suggest me as to where i am missing any settings.
With best regards,
Niyaz Sayyed.

Dear Niyaz Sayyed
You need to check in the following areas:-
- check whether the material is defined as non-valuated stock
- go to OME9, select your Account Assignment and see whether you have checked the box "GR non-valuated". It should not have been checked
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Central Contract Management in case of Classic Scenario

Hi,
At our current implementation, requirement is to implement both Service procurement(with hierarchy) and Central Conract Management. I was exploring the possibility of utilizing Central Contract Management with Classic scenario.
Will the Central Contracts created in this fashion be available in Sourcing Cockpit for the buyer to select against Purchase Requisitions? Will the Central Contract be visible at all in SRM in this case ?
Please respond only with reference to Classic scenario.
Thanks,
Abhilash

Yes the Central Contract will be available in the Sourcing Cockpit, both local and classic scenario's. Yes the Central Contracts will be available for the creation of Purchase Requisitions in R/3 and to assign SOS in R/3.
Do know that for SRM 7.0 PI is required for setting up Central Contracts. This is promised to change with the release of EHP1 for SRM (due june 2010).
Kind regards,
Tim

Query cost and CASE statement

Hi, I'm working on a performance issue for a customer.
I'm tuning some suspect SQL that uses complex DECODE statements to perform IF/THEN/ELSE logic.
I've taken a statement and rewritten it using CASE however what I've noticed is the cost of the query execution plan has increased dramatically as a result. N.B. I haven't changed the WHERE clause of the query as yet, just replaced one DECODE with the equivalent CASE.
The db version is 9.2.0.4. Does anyone know of issues with the performance of CASE as opposed to DECODE. I'm wondering should I leave the DECODEs as is even though they're way too complicated.
Tks,
Paul.

Here's an example of a DECODE:
nvl(count(distinct decode
(decode(sign(ords.dwh_created_date_id-:v_start_cycle_id),1,1,0,1,-1,0) *
decode(sign(:v_end_cycle_id-ords.dwh_created_date_id),1,1,0,1,-1,0),1,ords.dwh_order_id,NULL)),0) calc1
The equivalent CASE I've coded is:
NVL(COUNT(DISTINCT(CASE WHEN (ords.dwh_created_date_id BETWEEN :v_start_cycle_id AND :v_end_cycle_id)
THEN
ords.dwh_order_id
ELSE
NULL
END)),0) calc1
I've been doing further testing with an amended WHERE clause and did run both CASE and DECODE versions. The performance difference between the two was negligible. So it seems (as I'd hoped) that the amendment of the execution path doesn't appear to be affected by CASE even though Oracle reports the query cost of it is higher.
It is slightly confusing though. Is the query cost in this case a red herring ?

Not getting Material Costs in Production Order - MTO Scenario

Hi,,
When we are execting MTO Scenario, We are not getting Material costs in Cost analysis of Production Order (Transaction Code CO03).
We have executed cost estiamte. but we are not gettig the material cost.we are getting only Activity price of Labour Hours.
The problem is -
1. we have created Sales order
2. we have Run MRP & Planned order changed as production order
3. But in this production order Costing Relevancy check box was not activated automatically. it is in gray mode and not able change this.
4. Is the problem with SD configuration? Kindly help me in fix this issue.
Note - if we create production order directly - it is showing the Material cost. But only in MTO scenariod it is not giving the material cost.
Kindly help me how to fix this issue.
Thanks
Kishore
Edited by: Emergys Corp on Nov 5, 2009 7:02 AM

In Requirement class (SD Configuration - OVZH)- we have to give valuation & Costing Sheet assignment.
Thanks
Kishore

Production Order in ETO

Hi Gurus,
In ETO (Engineer to Order) scenario what is best practise to generate Production Order?
Is the Production order is generated at WBS element or Plant level? If the Production order is generated at plant level how raw mat is consumed from project stock.
How the HALB costing is done in ETO scenario. WIll the Cost of HALB is reflected on project? If yes at what price?

Q1a - The inv/coll requirement in MRP4 is blank (ind/collective). Still we are unable consume the mat from WBS1.1.
A - Make it 2 or 1..if 1 you cannot issue from one WBS to other, if 2 you can issue as it acts as w/o a/c assignment
Q3a- My question in ETO scenarion Is FERT Is attached to the activity and BOM exploded in MRP or HALB is attached to activity and during MRP ...it is exploded and dependent requirements are generated.
A- I have not understood what do you mean by activity..anyhow during MRP only the depeddent requirements will be generated unless you have assembly to order (stg 80 series). Hence MRP drives explotion of BOM
Q4. During MRP, PR is getting created at WBS2.1 for RAW materail as raw is available at WBS1.1. Can setting be made such way that during MRP, availability check is done at Project level but not at WBS level. Currently we are not using any stratergy grp for HALB.
A - PR is getting generated as theere is a depeddent requirement in WBS 2.1, hence you can do WBS to WBS transfer using 411Q. About the availability check at project levele during MRP run is not fesible...pl refer Q1a answer. Go for ind/coll requirement = 2 for such raw materials.

IDOC to JDBC scenario in case of Cost Element Group IDOC.

This is an IDOC to JDBC scenario.
The Cost Element Group IDOC is having different segments. The main segment E1COGH (1...unbound) is consisting of different subsegment like E1OGS (0...unbound) & E1COGV (0...unbound). The main segment (E1COGH) along with subsegments E1OGS & E1COGV) is occuring more that 1 times. I have to insert data into the table, which we can do in single rows (no hierarchy is possible in tables). I have used "use one as many" in message mapping. Now if E1OGS or E1COGV is repeating in a single E1COGH segment then we dont get any error. But if I duplicate the main segment then I am getting runtime exception.
Please suggest about how to map in this case.

In my scenario:
     E1COGH
     |
      -> E1COGS
         E1COGV
where     E1CGH -> Main segment
     E1COGS & E1COGV -> sub segment
E1COGH -> 1..unbound
E1COGS -> 1..unbound
E1COGV -> 1..unbound
At the target side I have created two Statement Structure (ie.Statement & Statement_1) . One for E1COGS (ie. Statement) & the other for E1COGV (ie. Statement_1).
Case 1 -> If E1COGS is present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped AS IS.
Case 2 -> If E1COGS is not present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped as blank.
This will be mapped with Statement & in the absence of E1COGS this Statement structure is SUPPRESSED.
Similarly,
Case 1 -> If E1COGV is present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped AS IS.
Case 2 -> If E1COGV is not present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped as blank.
This will be mapped with Statement_1 & in the absence of E1COGV this Statement_1 structure is SUPPRESSED.
All the elements of the segment E1COGH, E1COGHT & E1COGHR are replicated in all the rows for X (no. of occurance of E1COGS) + Y (no. of occurance of E1COGV).
While testing in Message Mapping, I am able to get the output as for multiple occurence of E1COGS & E1COGV in a single E1COGH.
But if I increse the occurence of E1COGH the it is giving the following error :
Runtime exception during processing target field mapping /ns0:MT_Cost_Element_Group_Response/Statement/DBtablename/access/GROUPNAME. The message is: Exception:[com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.IllegalInstanceException: Too few values in first queue in function useOneAsMany. It must have the same number of contexts as second queue.] in class com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.NodeFunctions method useOneAsMany[com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.CollapseContexts@51197231, , ]
Please suggest how to map the occurence of E1COGH simultaneously with the occurence of E1COGS & E1COGV.

ETO - MTO scenario

We have an ETO scenario where we have a Sales Order assigned to a WBS element. Project creates MRP for material procurement and assembly. So all the purchased components are account-assigned to the Project and the project creates Producttion Order for in-house production of FG.
At the month end should the variances on the production order be settled to the Material and COPA or should it go to the WBS (or should it be network)? The reason I am asking this is because when we run the s_alr_87013533 report for projects we do not see any production order related actual costs in the actual costs column of the report.
Please advise.
thanks
raj

Raj,
Yes. Process for ETO is similar to MTO. MTO has sales order as settlement received ,if production order is tied to Sales order.
In ETO , it is just replaced by NWA.....
In both scenario , if you decide to delink production order , then Settlement received should be material.
Hope it helps,
Jatin

Costing in case of ETO Scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for