Counter on my blog

My counter should have turned over to 10,000 today. Instead, it went back to 1000! What can I do to fix this?

OT,
Thx Much.
Did all you suggested with the footer and still no counter visible:
http://web.me.com/quathletics/QuinnipiacMidnight_Madness_2009/2009_Quinnipiac_Midnight_Madness/2009_Quinnipiac_MidnightMadness.html
Had similar issues with another iWeb blog...something is not right with this and any help would be appreciated.

Similar Messages

Counting number of blog entries

I was wondering if there was a way to count how many blog entries you have made. You know, just so you can easily say, this is my 100th post
Thank you!

Thank you so much Cyclosaurus!
Much appreciated.
I do have another question - is it possible using iWeb and the Movie template page to add comments to the movies - like you can for Blogs and Photos?

I've Made the Switch (from iWeb) & Lived to Tell About It.

I've gotten a lot of help and useful information from this forum over the years and I will certainly miss it. I've just completed a 2 month transition where I've migrated my site from iWeb/Mobile Me to a new site made in RapidWeaver and hosted by Host Excellence. I figured I'd write a little (or a lot) about my experience, to give some others an idea of what they've got to look forward too. Hopefully it will arm you with some things to do and look out for. While I am describing RapidWeaver here, a lot of this process will be the same no matter what new software you use. I started off being pretty happy with what I had going in iWeb and not being thrilled at all about making the switch. Now I am so glad I made the switch and I am far happier about the new site than I was with the old one. BTW: the new sites address is: http://grillinsmokin.net . Feel free to visit. I think you'll quickly notice some things you simple can't do in iWeb. This isn't a knock against iWeb. I was very happy with iWeb and had no plans to switch. Where it hasn't been developed actively for four years now, it has been left behind somewhat.
To begin at the beginning: I've had a site made with iWeb since January of 2006 called Grillin' & Smokin' that combined my love of outdoor cooking and photography. Over the years it had grown rather large, with 375 photo entry pages and 230 blog pages. The Domain file was around 1.4 GB. This was not something I ever wanted to have to recreate from scratch. However losing MobileMe as a host was taking away Value Added features like the Hit Counter, Slide Show, Blog Comments, Blog Search etc. The handwriting is on the wall for iWeb too. I might have gone on using iWeb, but between losing key features and the fact iWeb was starting to show it's age, it was time for me to move on. Just before the iCloud announcement this Spring, I began researching website building software. I looked at their features, working methodology, themes, plug-ins and extensions. I download trial versions of the software where it was available as well as some of the themes or plugins I might be using. I gotta tell you, at first I was very frustrated and upset, because I was not finding anything that had the ease of use of iWeb and looked like it was going to be able to recreate the appearance of my original site. It appeared to be a series of compromises. I'd like the features of one package but I hated the themes available for that software. Another looked promising but isn't being upgraded regularly. My biggest frustration was some of the iWeb page types just don't exist in other packages. For example the Album Pages where multiple Photo Pages can be grouped and displayed, don't have a direct equivalent in any other package I saw. As part of my discovery process I read reviews of the various packages, including head to head comparisons of some of them. I also visited their discussion forums. After doing this for 3 weeks I "settled" on RapidWeaver. It was under active development; had a thriving developer community turning out a wide variety of add ons, plug-ins and themes; had an active user community & had lots of help resources available. The web pages it produced were standards compliant and you could get nice effects without resorting to Flash. I think the biggest selling point was all of the add-ons-kind of the same advantage the iPhone has with it's App Store.
Once I bought RapidWeaver & a 3rd Party theme, I tried the demo versions of some of the plug-ins and made sample versions of my page types from iWeb in RapidWeaver. I wanted to have a process in place, before I started mass production on the site. You really do need to do some of this homework in advance to avoid unpleasant surprises. The biggest minus I'd turned up about RapidWeaver (RW from this point on) is it didn't handle big sites well at all. The equivalent of the iWeb Domain file is the RapidWeaver Sandwich file or RWSW file. Once the RWSW file reaches 100MB or so you can get crashes or hangs uploading your site. Now 100 MB doesn't sound like much particularly when I was talking about a 1.4GB iWeb Domain File for my site, but RW doesn't include the photos in the RWSW file. Still I knew I was going to have to divide my site across several RWSW files. Initially the plan was to divide it into 3 sites: The main landing pages was one RWSW file and is the site reached by the url for the site. I was going to have a second RWSW file for my blogs and a third for my photos. Ultimately I ended up dividing the photos into 3 RWSW files. These extra files are hosted on sub-domians whose name goes in front of the main domain (http://sub-domain.main-domain.com). This meant some extra setup for me with my web-host, although they made the setup for the 4 sub-domains very easy and they were free. If you have a huge site and will need to split it, you'll want to check with your prospective web host if they charge extra for hosting additional sub-domains. For small iWebs sites this is not an issue-you have one RWSW file and one web address, just like you do now. My having sub-domains also meant more work linking files together across sites. RapidWeaver has something called an Offsite Page which helped with some of this, but having to split my sites up was the biggest PITA for me about the whole process. But knowing about this going in was better than finding out at the end when I tried to upload a single massive site. If you have a small site, the setup for uploading it is as straight forward as iWeb. RW has a built in FTP uploader or you can publish to file and use an FTP client like CyberDuck.
Once I had my site organization in place and had experimented with best practices for recreating each iWeb page type in RW, it was time to begin. I've gotta tell you when I started out I was not a happy camper. I liked the iWeb way of doing things about 70 percent of the time vs 30 percent for RW. At the end of the first week I told myself I have to move on and give up on the past. I was no longer going to be using iWeb and the sooner I embraced the RW way of doing things, the better off I'd be. At this early point it was still hard to see down the road to the end results. No matter what new package you buy, you should try to go with the flow and learn a new way of working. You'll be happier and less frustrated in the end. In my case after having gone through the entire process now, I've ended up changing my opinion. Now that I've gone through the entire process, I like the RapidWeaver way of doing things about 95 percent of the time and 5% for iWeb. That 5 percent is mostly the large site issue I've described. As I began working I was able to reuse much of the text from my iWeb blog in RW. I did have to paste it in as unformatted and reformat it in RW. My pictures were well organized in Aperture which also helped speed the process. One of the things I did is automate some of the tedious repetitious tasks. I created Quickeys macros to do things for me when ever possible. For example I could go to a particular photo page in iWeb and select the first caption. I would then trigger a macro that asked how many captions are on this page. It would then select the caption in iWeb, copy it, switch to RW and paste it in place and repeat XX times. If you know Quickeys or Applescript (I am guessing) there are plenty of opportunities to put it to good use.
RW present a different way of working than you are used to in iWeb and you'll just need to get used to it. What I am describing here would be true of any of the other packages I looked at too. First off it isn't WYSIWYG while you are editing. You are working with fairly basic looking text with few clues as to what the real page looks like. You switch to a preview mode to see what the page looks like in a browser. At first blush iWeb seems to win here. But what I soon realized is RW allows you to mix regular text and pictures together with html snippets right in the same text box. This makes adding counters or badges easy. Plus you can use HTML formatting for things like Titles occurring through your page. Instead of increasing the font size, making the text bold and changing its color, you can simply say this is Heading style 2 or 5 and this happens automatically per the predefined style. Better yet if you change a style everything on that one page or the entire site (your choice) inherits that change. So by working in a non-WYSIWYG mode you gain some long term. advantages over how iWeb works. The same is true with positioning. In iWeb it is fast and easy to place things on a page right down to the pixel. RW just doesn't give you that type of precision and next to splitting my site, layout was my biggest frustration with RW. At least to start. But there is a good reason for this "lack of precision" that may not be apparent until you view the site in a browser. When iWeb came out, you really didn't zoom your browser. iWeb uses Absolute Positioning where it uses anchored boxes for everything, whereas RW uses Relative Positioning. Objects with anchored text or picture boxes like iWeb start having problems if you zoom in or out more than one step. Text starts over flowing other text because the text boxes are anchored by one point. Pages just start looking scary if you try to zoom in or out too much. RW is looking at items relative positions and their relationships with one another. So initially you aren't placing the objects in the same way, it is more like eyeballing things in a way. But when viewed in a web browser you can zoom in or out to your heart's content. So what seems at first like a big disadvantage at first for RW, is actually a HUGE advantage.
This is why you need to go with the flow and try to embrace the new way of working. I mentioned earlier that I wasn't able to find a page type that was equivalent to the iWeb album page. I was able to use a very flexible plug-in for RW called stacks, which allows you to create various single and multi-column or multi-row layouts using empty stacks. You then populate the empty stacks with content, pictures text etc. These pages were not like iWeb albums where you nest the Photo Album Pages in the Album page and they create a skimmable preview and an automatic link to the album. Once I actually started making these new "Album" Pages in RW I realized I was gaining as much or more than I was loosing. The skimmable preview pictures was eyecandy I could live without. Nice touch, not essential. I never liked the way the preview picture shown on the Album page was the first photo in the Photo album. You couldn't change this. Now that I am placing my own photo on the Album page, I could use any picture and make it any size I wanted too. In iWeb the Album Caption was the name of the Photo Page. If this name was too long the caption didn't go to a second line, it got cut off. Any link in RW can have a description added to the link which is what you see in the yellow box when you hover your mouse over the item being linked. I used to hide text boxes links under the pictures on the Albums page for SEO and navigation help. So yes now I have to manually link the Album picture to the Photo Page, but I am no longer creating a hidden text box with a link that I have to remember to move when I add pages to the album. So once again my first impression was wrong. Advantage RW.
Another advantage to RW is any page type can have a sidebar. You can easily add favicons and site logos. You can easily add metadata to any page and customized the names of the path to your pages. The Themes can be more powerful and customizable too. About one week into the process I was begining to really go with the flow and see this new way of working had far more advantages for me than disadvantages.
By the time I finished my new RW site, my iWeb site was looking tired and dated. My biggest and most pleasant surprises were saved until the end. Any kind of SEO was a PITA with iWeb. You had to embed snippets on each page with a code from HaloScan or Google Analytics. Problem was, iWeb erased any such HTML code while you were uploading. So you then had to use a regular expression in the text box ("HaloScan goes here"), upload your site and replace the regular expression with the actual code using a 3rd party tool. Oh and don't do that on any blog page where you are using the built in Apple commenting system because the comments will disappear. I also had problems where the new comment badge would not show up for weeks or months after a comment was made. It was getting so the things I had to do AFTER I uploaded my site to MobileMe were taking longer than uploading the site. Once the site was recreated, it was time to add blog comments, a guestbook, a contact form, Google Analytics, and publish a site map. In my iWeb-influenced mind, I was saving the fussy PITA things for last. I was dead wrong. Unlike what you go through with iWeb, it couldn't have been been easier in RW:
-Blog Comments: Set up an account with the provider. Then I had to go into the page setup in RW for my blog page and click on a popup menu of comment providers & select Discus. If your provider isn't listed you paste some HTML code from the provider into a dialogue box provided by RW for the blog page. In my case it was simpler, just set Discus in the popup menu. Now instead of the iWeb badge showing me new posts (and only when it was in the mood), I now get an email.
-Google Analytics: Set up an account with Google. Go to the Stats area in the RW side bar, click on Configure, paste in your code from Google and you are good to go. You can monitor your Google analytics stats right from within RapidWeaver. (Also works this way for GoSquared Live Stats).
-Guestbook: Same as iWeb. You add a page with an HTML snippet from your Guestbook provider in an iFrame.
-Contact Form: This is a RW page type which masks your email address from the spambots by transferring the information to an invisible and inaccessible page within your site. This page then emails you the information.
-Full Site Search: This doesn't exist in iWeb. You can search your blogs right now, but this is one of the features you lose when MobileMe shuts down. By adding an inexpensive Plug in called RapidSearch Pro I enable full site search. You set up a MySQL server for your site. Host Excellence walked me through the 4-Step Process via a well written Help File. You then control what pages are indexed via your sitemap.xml file. You let RapidSearch Pro index your site and you are good to go.
-SiteMap: There is a simple SiteMap generation feature built into RW 5. There are third party tools for doing this for iWeb. I purchased an inexpensive RW plug in called SiteMap plus that not only generates the sitemap.xml file, it allows you to customize what pages get searched and at what frequency. This ties into what is searched via RapidSearch Pro. This plug-in also generates a visible and customizable sitemap page to help your site's users find their way around. Another bonus of being hosted off Mobile Me is when I went to add my sites to my Google account they had already been indexed. It seemed like they never crawled MobileMe unless you told them you wanted them to look at your site.
Link Checking: This doesn't exist in iWeb. I bought another inexpensive plug-in called Link Inspector for RW. It checks all of your internal and external links and generates a report showing the status of all links. This was just what the doctor ordered for my large site. I will run it periodically to make sure external links are still working and that I haven't broken any internal links.
My site was pretty much wrapped up on Monday August 8th. I just had to add in Blog Comments, Google Analytics, the Guestbook, Full Site Search and the Site Map. I figured I would go public on Tuesday or Wednesday. To my great pleasure these 5 items took all of 2 hours to get set up and working. This was a nice touch after 2 months of hard work.
So there you have it. This is the process I went through converting my site over to RapidWeaver. Your mileage may vary. I am not pushing RapidWeaver for everyone. You have to find what program is the right fit for you. You may find staying with iWeb on a new host is the right fit for you. You need to decide if you can live with the features you lose once you aren't hosted on Mobile Me. For me there was great pain, but in the end there was a lot of gain too. I do like my new site and I feel it will serve me well for years to come. Good luck to all of you in whatever path you choose. Lastly thanks one last time to the helpful folks around here
Jim
http://grillinsmokin.net
Message was edited by: Jim Mahoney

Thanks Roddy. I agree with your take on some of the other software you mentioned, at least from the perspective of having dabbled with demo versions of some of the others. I will add that with Sandvox I felt a little nervous about it. Kind of almost like the software was a "hobby" effort a la the first gen Apple TV.
I also agree with some of your points regarding RapidWeaver. But now that I've built my rather large (for a hobbyist site) website with it I will have to respectfully disagree about it being at the same level as iWeb, or as you put it: a sideways move. While iWeb can be made to do things it was never originally meant to do, there are many places it simply can't go that RapidWeaver can. I was often hitting the limits of what you could do in iWeb, whereas with RapidWeaver, with one exception, I didn't feel like I was running up against any limits yet. The exception is it's lack of ability to handle large sites well. That was almost the deal breaker for me. I find it unexplainable that a software package with all kinds of add-ons helping you make more ambitious sites, can't handle those same sites in a single file. This was almost a deal-breaker for me. For folks who have small to medium sized iWeb sites this isn't a concern. There are also ways to warehouse images on the server to keep file size down, but this gets more complex than many folks coming from iWeb would want to do. Me splitting my site up the way I did was more work than I wanted to do.I almost bagged the whole thing and was close to just taking the old site down.
Now if we were to fantasize for a minute I can think of a way where I could also say iWeb to RapiWeaver is a sideways move: While I don't think iWeb '09 is the equal to RapidWeaver 5, I'd bet that iWeb 11 or the oft rumored iWeb Pro might have been. I kept hoping that Apple would keep pushing the limits of what iWeb could do and add in some missing features and head down the HTML 5 road.
I will conditionally agree on your saying that the shopping list for RapidWeaver can be substantial. I will qualify that by saying: Depending on what you are doing with it, your shopping list for RapidWeaver can be substantial. With one exception, I do think the base package of RapidWeaver is fairly priced. I think the basic Stacks functionality and a few basic stacks should be part of RapidWeaver. The more esoteric stacks can be pay as you go. When iLife 11 was announced without a an update to iWeb, I did some preliminary pricing and I was rather discouraged at the total. This spring I got more serious about things and repriced RapidWeaver and add-ons. After trying out various themes and plug-ins, I was able to sharpen my pencil and reduce the cost of entry considerably. One of the things that helped is the theme I bought had a couple features built into it. It had a nice lightbox type slideshow for photo pages and animated banners/headers capabilities built in. This saved me the expense of several additional plug-ins. Also while I have a blog, I don't consider myself a blogger. I was able to use the built in blog page and I don't feel limited by it at all. Some of the other ad-ons I bought: such as the link checker, site wide search and a more sophisticated sitemap generator were items I added because I could tell I would want to keep the site going long term. Those 3 plug-ins did that a a low price. I didn't think they needed to be built in.
But everyone's mileage may vary. RapidWeaver or any other web design program isn't right for every iWeb user. It all depends on personal needs, abilities and budgets. I'm just glad I can get back to posting to the site and not recreating it.
Jim

Performance Problem with WCF proxy

I communication with SAP XI and Microsoft BizTalk from a .NET 3.0 WCF proxy. I receive about 5 MB of data. When I use a .NET 2.0 generated proxy (Visual Studio) the calls are quite fast and take nearly the same time. If I use a WCF (.NET 3.0) proxy the communication with BizTalk is very fast, but with XI it takes extremely long.
What's the reason for that? Does the WCF proxy parse and validate the message? (5 MB are quite much..., with a few KB I don't have this problem) How can I deactivate the validation?
thanks in advance

Hi Thomas,
not sure what you mean with deactivate validation. have you check with WCF Performance Counters where the problem can be? For more information about performance countes see http://blogs.msdn.com/sonuarora/. Let me now what the counters say, mazbe I'm able to help you then with more details.
- Juergen

Blocking Anonymous Comments in iWeb 08?

Is there a way to disable the anonymous comments option in iWeb?

Are you hosting your site on an external server? If so, iWeb actually tells you when you publish to a folder that certain features are not available such as blog comments, hit counter etc.
Blog comments or any comments are a MobileMe only feature, so you have to publish here to get them.

Operationsmanager database is consuming lot of space

Hi All,
I have a issue, My operations manager database is of 40GB and out of which 19 GB was always free.
From the past 1 - 2 weeks my database is occupying lot of space and currently i have only 9GB free.
When i ran a SQL query to pull what data of what is consuming lot of space below is the report.
SQL Query what i used:
SELECT so.name,
8 * Sum(CASE WHEN si.indid IN (0, 1) THEN si.reserved END) AS data_kb,
Coalesce(8 * Sum(CASE WHEN si.indid NOT IN (0, 1, 255) THEN si.reserved END), 0) AS index_kb,
Coalesce(8 * Sum(CASE WHEN si.indid IN (255) THEN si.reserved END), 0) AS blob_kb
FROM dbo.sysobjects AS so JOIN dbo.sysindexes AS si ON (si.id = so.id)
WHERE 'U' = so.type GROUP BY so.name ORDER BY data_kb DESC
Output:
Last 5 days back the report (When the space came to 12GB)
name
data_kb
index_kb
StateChangeEvent
7347832
753376
PerformanceSource
4001200
1783192
PerformanceData_40
2310000
671704
PerformanceData_38
2240256
648800
PerformanceData_42
2063936
596704
AlertHistory
1412752
177984
PerformanceData_36
1390320
406616
Alert
1369984
162984
PerformanceData_44
764976
224600
RecursiveMembership
482152
176856
Event_40
420400
5912
Event_42
313984
4320
Event_36
290688
4000
Event_38
289600
3808
Event_34
252976
3352
In last 3 days the new report (Currently when the space came to 9GB)
name
data_kb
index_kb
blob_kb
StateChangeEvent
7417272
764896
0
PerformanceSource
4009712
1786904
0
PerformanceData_46
3626432
1042144
0
PerformanceData_40
2310000
671704
0
PerformanceData_38
2240256
648800
0
PerformanceData_42
2063936
596704
0
PerformanceData_44
1873840
548888
0
AlertHistory
1468880
182208
0
Alert
1399576
152832
0
Event_46
526832
6936
0
RecursiveMembership
482728
177240
0
Event_40
420400
5912
0
Event_42
313984
4320
0
Event_44
306608
4184
0
Event_36
290688
4000
0
My Current grooming settings for Operationsmanager DB are as below.
Can any one help me in how do i reduce this space occupation please ?
Gautam.75801

1) You may refer to the following SQL statement to find out the lare table query of operations Manager Database and Operations manager DataWarehouse.
SELECT TOP 1000
a2.name AS [tablename], (a1.reserved + ISNULL(a4.reserved,0))* 8 AS reserved,
a1.rows as row_count, a1.data * 8 AS data,
(CASE WHEN (a1.used + ISNULL(a4.used,0)) > a1.data THEN (a1.used + ISNULL(a4.used,0)) - a1.data ELSE 0 END) * 8 AS index_size,
(CASE WHEN (a1.reserved + ISNULL(a4.reserved,0)) > a1.used THEN (a1.reserved + ISNULL(a4.reserved,0)) - a1.used ELSE 0 END) * 8 AS unused,
(row_number() over(order by (a1.reserved + ISNULL(a4.reserved,0)) desc))%2 as l1,
a3.name AS [schemaname]
FROM (SELECT ps.object_id, SUM (CASE WHEN (ps.index_id < 2) THEN row_count ELSE 0 END) AS [rows],
SUM (ps.reserved_page_count) AS reserved,
SUM (CASE WHEN (ps.index_id < 2) THEN (ps.in_row_data_page_count + ps.lob_used_page_count + ps.row_overflow_used_page_count)
ELSE (ps.lob_used_page_count + ps.row_overflow_used_page_count) END ) AS data,
SUM (ps.used_page_count) AS used
FROM sys.dm_db_partition_stats ps
GROUP BY ps.object_id) AS a1
LEFT OUTER JOIN (SELECT it.parent_id,
SUM(ps.reserved_page_count) AS reserved,
SUM(ps.used_page_count) AS used
FROM sys.dm_db_partition_stats ps
INNER JOIN sys.internal_tables it ON (it.object_id = ps.object_id)
WHERE it.internal_type IN (202,204)
GROUP BY it.parent_id) AS a4 ON (a4.parent_id = a1.object_id)
INNER JOIN sys.all_objects a2 ON ( a1.object_id = a2.object_id )
INNER JOIN sys.schemas a3 ON (a2.schema_id = a3.schema_id)
WHERE a2.type <> N'S' and a2.type <> N'IT'
2) Moreover, your query return that the suddndly increase of DB siza came from performance data and you may use the following queryto find out which rule generated a hugh mount of performance data.
select r.rulename, count(*) from performancedataallview pv
inner join performancesource ps on pv.performancesourceinternalid=ps.performancesourceinternalid
inner join rules r on r.ruleid=ps.ruleid
group by r.rulename
order by count(*) desc
http://blogs.technet.com/b/kevinholman/archive/2007/10/18/useful-operations-manager-2007-sql-queries.aspx
Roger

Methods to install updates days before restart

Firstly, my apologies if this has been answered elsewhere, however I have been unable to find anything solid.
I am implementing software updates via SCCM and my management is requiring me to use the following timing for update:
Catalog is synchronized and updates downloaded Thursday.
Updates are made available and required to be installed on Thursday night.
A restart is not required until the following Monday night, when there is a countdown and then is forced.
I have been trying to make this work however have as yet been unsuccessful, so I was hoping someone could help sort out exactly how this is supposed to work.
From what I have read there are a couple of ways this could be achieved.
Create a deployment with an installation deadline of ASAP, do not allow forced restarts outside a maintenance window, and then create a MW for the Monday night.
Create a deployment with an installation deadline of ASAP, do not allow restarts. Then create another deployment of a restart script (batch or something like Coretech Shutdowntool) scheduled to deploy Monday night to handle the rebooting side of things.
I have attempted the first one however I have had no luck getting the restart to actually occur. The installation works, but the restart just never happens. I fear I am doing something wrong, however I am not familiar enough with aspects of the
software to say for certain what is and isn't possible.
Any help or information I could get would be very much appreciated.
Many thanks.

maintenance window would work in your case. You can have the updates installed during the MW and get the clients restart . You should focus little attention on the maintenance window calculation .
follow these blogs on MW calculation and reboot count down http://blogs.technet.com/b/configurationmgr/archive/2013/06/11/configmgr-2012-support-tip-clients-never-reboot-even-when-required-in-a-deployment.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/csloyan/archive/2010/10/24/maintenance-window-calculations-explained.aspx
Eswar Koneti | Configmgr Blog: www.eskonr.com | Linkedin: Eswar Koneti
| Twitter: eskonr

Comments Widget not working in iWeb 08 2.0.4

I need some help with the Comments Widget. I've added this to my blog posts but it isn't working. The widget / comments box isn't showing.
Where the widget should be showing, it simply says:
Comments Widget
I can provide screen shots if needed.
Thanks!

Are you hosting your site on an external server? If so, iWeb actually tells you when you publish to a folder that certain features are not available such as blog comments, hit counter etc.
Blog comments or any comments are a MobileMe only feature, so you have to publish here to get them.

Display count for each category in sharePoint 2013 blog site

Hi,
I have added category list in the left side as web part in SharePoint 2013 blog site.
Here i want to show the count for each category. And on clicking on the category, it should show the blog posts related to that category.
Is there any way to do this.
Please help.
Thank you.

Hi Aditi,
To show item counts on a list, you might need to query the list by title in the navigation menu and retrieve item count in the list, then use CSS to add the number to navigation menu. You need to use Client Object Model and JQuery.
Here are similar issues:
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/5477/getting-a-count-of-list-items-in-a-list-via-ecmascript
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/18050/how-do-i-get-the-number-of-items-in-a-list
Regards,
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support

Why is the Counter Not Showing on my Blog Front Page?

Anyone know why me blog is not showing on my blog's main page:
http://web.me.com/quathletics/QuinnipiacMidnight_Madness_2009/2009_Quinnipiac_Midnight_Madness/2009_Quinnipiac_MidnightMadness.html
I can see it in iWeb, but after publishing site, it does not show?
Any suggestions.
Thx Much

OT,
Thx Much.
Did all you suggested with the footer and still no counter visible:
http://web.me.com/quathletics/QuinnipiacMidnight_Madness_2009/2009_Quinnipiac_Midnight_Madness/2009_Quinnipiac_MidnightMadness.html
Had similar issues with another iWeb blog...something is not right with this and any help would be appreciated.

How do I create an archive system for a blog created with a custom app?

I had to create a blog using a custom app, because I needed an image to show up in the list view (a feature I can't believe does not exist in the blog module). Anyways, I am wondering how can I create an archive system? Do I need to create categories for each month/year and then classify the post each time we create one. Then manually create links each month to pages that filters listing by that category? This is the system I tried, but I was wondering if there was a better way.
Also, I would like to have a sidebar that shows all the authors/contributors of the blogs and have a count under their photo that shows how many blogs they have contributed to, and have this update dynamically each time they create a new post. I was wondering if a data source tag is the way to do this but I don't have enough information on how the data source tag even works, to really know how to do this.
I have searched google for hours, and even signed up for BC gurus tutorials with no real luck. I thought BC gurus was going to have the answer but it wasn't quite detailed enough. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!

You can use classifications but there is no auto feature to archive like that on web apps.
In terms of the blog, Like I have said to everyone that has posted about blog preview images:
http://www.prettypollution.com.au/business-catalyst-blog
Just one example of an image at the start of the blog post rendering out, not hard at all.

DataTable.Rows.Count property is occasionally wrong

I have a web service in C#.NET which calls a stored procedure using ADO.NET. The stored procedure is always returning 1 row, which is then loaded into a DataTable. The Rows.Count property of the DataTable is then examined.
When this web service is called repeatedly with numerous requests, it occasionally returns Rows.Count as 0 when it should be 1. I have debugged and examined it at runtime and found that there is indeed 1 row in the datatable, but that the Rows.Count property
is 0.
Is this a known bug?
I'm using .Net Framework 2.0
Note: This is an issue that occurs very rarely. My testing shows that it takes about 90 minutes to recreate it when you have 2 concurrent processes sending requests repeatedly at a rate of about 10 requests per second.

Are you sure that there aren't multiple threads access the DataTable?
Can you post a repro?
David
David http://blogs.msdn.com/b/dbrowne/

Counting in DAX - Questions

Hello
I´m having problems counting properly in DAX. Here´s an image with the pivot tables:
And here is the sample spreadsheet if you want to check it:
Counting in DAX
The current calculated fields are:
Max CLOSE 1 Week:
=IF([Sum of CLOSE]=BLANK(),BLANK(),(CALCULATE(MAX(FactTable[CLOSE]),DATESINPERIOD(Calendar[FullDate],LASTDATE(Calendar[FullDate])-1,-7,DAY))))
1 Week New High:
=IF(SUM(FactTable[CLOSE])>[Max CLOSE 1 Week],1)
Problems:
1) On table 1 we need to add a calculated field that counts the trading days to the last "1" that appeared on "1 Week New High", as noted in the example.
2) On table 2 we need to count the symbols for each date context that have a 1 week new high price, but for some reason the counting doesn´t work.
Can you please help?

well, from my understanding the definition of your "1 Week New High" measure is wrong.
try this one:
1 Week New High:=IF(
[Max CLOSE 1 Week]>CALCULATE([Max CLOSE 1 Week], DATEADD(Calendar[FullDate],-1, DAY)),
1)
it compares the current [Max CLOSE 1 Week] with the [Max CLOSE 1 Week] of the day before
you might want to change the ">" to "<>" but thats up to your definition
this makes a difference if one value is the [Max CLOSE 1 Week] for a whole week and runs out afterwards. [Max CLOSE 1 Week] would be a lower value then the day before - dont know if you want to flag this as a [1 Week New High] then
hth,
gerhard
Gerhard Brueckl
blogging @ http://blog.gbrueckl.at
working @ http://www.pmOne.com

Dynamically set maximum row count in Interactive Report

Hi,
Has anyone worked out a way of dynamically setting (e.g. via select list) the maximum row count value for an Interactive Report, taking into account issues with order by when the report is filtered. I'm aware of solutions like this: http://www.talkapex.com/2010/10/apex-reports-no-limit-downloads.html but as far as I can tell this doesn't work when the report is filtered and the IR is rewritten in the background. Data sets then become unreliable because they are reordered.
Thanks,
Mike

Hi Mike,
You can do that with javascript
gReport.search('SEARCH',100)the 100 you can replace for any number you like.I have a report with filter,sorting and groups and it is gives no problem there.
any number means any number but not higher than the number you set at Maximum Rows Per Page.
You probably can mix the solution from Martin and the above code.
Regards,
Kees Vlek
<tt>Company: http://www.orcado.nl
Blog: http://www.orcado.nl/blog/blogger/listings/69-kvlek
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/skier66</tt>
If the question is answered please change it to answered and mark the appropriate post as correct/helpfull.
Edited by: kvlek on 24-apr-2013 12:29
Edited by: kvlek on 24-apr-2013 12:35

High thread count on store.exe

I understand that the mdb store process utilizes as much memory as is available. My question is regarding the thread count on the process. One of the three mailbox servers tends to have a higher thread count than the other two. It
usually ranges from 150 to 200 (while the other two are usually 130 to 150) but today it is a little over 300. The rpc thread count on all the mailbox servers stays pretty low (60 or under) and the rpc thread count on the CAS servers usually
hang out around 55-65, so that's all good. All three mailbox servers also use VERY close to the same amount of memory all the time, so that doesn't seem to be making a difference. I am just trying to determine why the thread count is noticably
higher. This server and one of other mailbox servers replicate the public folder database, and I can understand why that would account for some additional activity, but you would think the thread count would be higher on the other server with the public
folder database as well, but it stays pretty low. Hardware-wise these servers are all identical. So is there something I can monitor in perf mon for instance? I don't want to use experfwiz because that monitors everything under the sun and
I need it a bit more centralized. I have googled all over the place and the only thing I can find is that with newer versions of exchange this thread count ranges from 200-300 on heavy usage, and exch07 can handle up to 500 threads, so I can't even find
which specific things to monitor that directly correlate with this issue. So while I understand that it's not really too high, I would like to find out why it deviates from the norm if the other two servers are equal for all intents and purposes (same
hardware, balanced DAG. etc). I would like to mitigate any potential issues. Thank you.

Hi pchw,
Thank you for your question.
I am sorry that we could not find the specific things to monitor this issuer directly, because there are many reason which caused it. For example: virus, big size attachment in queue, hardware performance and so on. We could refer to the following steps
to troubleshoot:
Restart the service of “Microsoft Exchange transport”;
Create a new database and move mailbox to new mailbox;
We could do some disk health check if the load test is normal;
Collect related application log and system log to
[email protected] for our troubleshooting.
We could run SDP on Exchange server and send it to
[email protected] for our troubleshooting.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/askie/archive/2012/05/22/introduction-to-support-diagnostics-platform-sdp.aspx
We could use tools and logs to analysis if there are anything wrong or abnormal on Exchange server 2013. our bottle neck is disk IO latency, store.exe do require some CPU usage, but if our disk IO speed can keep in a normal range, the
CPU usage will be smaller. Exchange is highly rely on disk IO performance because it need lots of IO operation regarding to transaction log and database file. If Disk IO has a high latency, I will definitely impact store.exe, if it`s getting seriously sometimes
it may cause store.exe no response.
We could refer to the following link:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee832791(v=exchg.141).aspx
If there are any questions regarding this issue, please be free to let me know.
Best Regard,
Jim

Counter on my blog

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for