Create Global Object Policy

Setting this policy on Server 2008 (not R2) domain controllers has no effect on users that are not domain admins. We have set this policy in the domain controller default policy. A user that is not a domain admin cannot create a global object,
specifically a page file backed file mapping. We have been performing this operation on previous operating systems without issues. On a Server 2008 system that is not a domain controller this policy performs as expected. Is there an additional
policy affecting this privelege? Is there a known issue on 2008 domain controllers?

Hi,
Thank you for your post here.
First of all, could you please double check whether the users have the
seCreateGlobalPrivilege
from the Create Global Object policy? You may count on
Showpriv.exe tool to enumerate the
privilege. What will happen if you disable UAC?
CreateFileMapping Function
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366537(v=VS.85).aspx
Since this is a issue related to Windows function/API, you would like to also post it on the MSDN
forum to get helps from Dev folks.

Similar Messages

How to create global object for a number of views?

Hello,
Let's say I have 5 different views in a certain component.
I would like to open a connection to a DB and share this connection between all views.
Can somone please show/explain me where do I do it on the component and how do I access this connection from the views?

Hi Roy,
For getting the connection, you can create the datasource in the "Visual Administrator" and you can get the connection from the datasource. By doing this, you can retrive the connection from the connection pool.
Refer the link to create the datasource and accessing it from the java code.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/82/fdbf2085f65f43a71e755fc904478d/frameset.htm
"How to Use SAP J2EE Database Pooling Service"
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/webas/stu/use sap j2ee database pooling service
If you need any further clarification let me know.
Regards,
Santhosh.C

Can't see objects from all db schemas in AV when creating a FGA Policy

Hi all,
I have installed Audit Vault successfully but when I try to create a FGA policy, in the Object field the objects from certain schemas don't appear in the list. I tried to verify if the user that the Agent uses to connect to the source database can see objects from all the schemas, so I connected to the source database trough SQL*Plus with this user and did a select on the table ALL_OBJECTS and could see all the objects.
Does anyone know if this could be a product bug? I have installed the version 10.2.3.2.
Any help will appreciated. Thanks!

Is there an existing AV protection on any of the objects, perhaps related to IP, program, etc.?

Policy regarding creating global or local classes?

Hi!
What policy do you have regarding creating local or global classes in your company? We have decided to mostly use local classes since there is a risk of reusing global classes (when changing something in the global class after it has been used by several programs etc.) . But on the other side it is much easier to use transaction SE24 than creating all the includes by hand. Have anyone else made thoughts about this issue?
Regards, Tine

Hi,
The policy is
Create global class if you want the class to be reused.
And to avoid problems when you change the class, make sure you change class in such a way that it does not effect the existing user's of the class.
Like use OPTIONAL parameters when you change method signature, avoid changing method names, instead add new methods.
You should use local classes only when you are sure that the code there is needed only by your program and nobody else.
If you keep creating local class's and if two programs need the same class it is redundant to create local class's and if you want a change in the class you have to change in all the places.
I hope it is clear.
Regards,
Sesh

This is what I get when I try to download my college text: This document requires global security policy to be disabled. Please go to Edit Preferences JavaScript and uncheck the "Enable global object security policy" checkbox. NOTE: In some versions

My college text is on my college website. When I try to download it this is what I get:
"This document requires global security policy to be disabled.
Please go to Edit > Preferences > JavaScript and uncheck the "Enable global object security policy" checkbox. NOTE: In some versions of Adobe Reader you may need to enable JavaScript first.
Message code: 005"
Help

matermax wrote:
Please go to Edit > Preferences > JavaScript and uncheck the "Enable global object security policy" checkbox. NOTE: In some versions of Adobe Reader you may need to enable JavaScript first.
And - did you?

Created policies does not match except Global Acces Policy

Hello,
I'm having an issue with our IronPort C160 web proxy. When I create new access policies and use one identity created by me,
the policy does not match even the user matches the identity used in this access policy. The user falls under Global Access Policy.
Model: S160
Version: 7.1.1-027 for Web
Any idea ? Any AsyncOS bug ?
Best Regards,

Hello Jaki,
First of all thank you for your reply. I have tested also using no authentication but it's the same thing. Now I'm noticing even the right Identity does not match, and the user always match the default identity.
Please have a look to the file containg the access logs.
I have tried with a user named test3 for a website that fall under the category Dating (www.eharmony.com). Normally the user should match TestPolicy policy and the page should be blocked but it does not and fall under default policy that allow the page to be viewed by the user.
It seems a thing very easy to configure and I don't know why it does not function. Maybe that I have to do any other configuration :S ?
Best Regards,
Ilir

How do I deselect global object security policy?

I'm trying to deselect the global object security policy on my iPad mini. How or where do I do this?

Since the global object is not supported on the mobile versions of Adobe Reader, there's nothing for you to change. Is someone/something telling you that you need to?

Can you create an object from a string

I have been working on creating a dynamic form, creating the
form items from an xml file. I am getting very close to conquering
this task. I will share it when it's complete.
However, I am stuck at the moment trying to create an object
from a string. For example, if the xml item is an HBox I want to
create an HBox. Like this: parentObject = new arrayOfFormItems[
index ]..type ()
This isn't working. First, is this possible using some syntax
I am unaware of in Flex? I don't want to use a large if or case
statement if possible.
Thanks in advance for your help!

Thank you very much. Indeed that did solve the one problem. I
missed the casting as a Display Object. That is awesome!
I do still however, have to instantiate one of every item I
want to dynamically create or I get the following error when I try
to create a dynamic object that I have not instantiated before.
ReferenceError: Error #1065: Variable HBox is not defined.
at global/flash.utils::getDefinitionByName()
at MyForm/buildForm()
at DynamicForm/::onComplete()
at
flash.events::EventDispatcher/flash.events:EventDispatcher::dispatchEventFunction()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent()
at flash.net::URLLoader/flash.net:URLLoader::onComplete()
I read that you have no choice but to instantiate one of each
type to force the linker to link the code for that class into the
.swf. Unless you know another way to force it.
This is what I have in my Application mxml to get it to work:
<mx:HBox>
<mx:Text visible="false"/>
<mx:TextArea visible="false"/>
<mx:TextInput visible="false"/>
<mx:DateField visible="false"/>
</mx:HBox>
And those are the types I'm using to test with. . . I will
have to add all the others I want to use as well . . .

ORA-00955 reports when I try to "create global temporary table" in windows

Hi,
When I try to run the sql in my oracle 9i server which is installed in a windows2000 machine,
Create global temporary table test ...;
For the first time, I can create table successfully.
But I cannot access this table any more:
drop table test;
desc test;
select * from test;
In addition, if I try to create the table again, I got the error:
ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing object
While the same table can be created and dropped in another oracle9i server which is installed in Solaris 9 machine.
So I suspect that this sould be a bug of window oracle server.
Is there anyone who can confirm this?
Or who can tell me how to report this bug to oracle?
Thanks in advance.
Please also refer the message at:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:::::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID:1046974576560
If you search the text: "create global temporary table sess_event", you can see for the first time, the table is created successfully.
But the ORA-00955 reports when the author try to create table for the second time.
This problem is exactly the same as my problem.
I have also made a search both in Google and in Oracle website and I cannot find any solution of it.

Read Metalink Note:68098.1 Subject: Overview of Temporary Tables
How did you difine the temporary tables? on commit delete rows are reserv rows?
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/appdev.920/a96590/adg03sch.htm#7794
Jaffar
Message was edited by:
The Human Fly

Photoshop CC 2014 crashes on creating 3D objects

Hello, I need help with this problem of Photoshop in this computer.
Photoshop CC 2014 crashes when choosing 3D > New 3D Extrusion From Selected Path and the rest of operations from this menu.
It can show the 3D Workspace, but creating 3D objects causes the program to crash. The GPU enhanced feature Perspective Warp works.
In Preferences > Performance Photoshop detects the graphics card as NVIDIA Corporation GeForce GT 610/PCIe/SSE2, and changing the Advanced Settings Mode to Basic does not solve the problem. Total VRAM says 2019 MB.
I've already installed 4GB more of RAM and a different graphics card (NVIDIA) apart of the integrated graphic card (AMD) trying to fix this problem, but it remains the same.
Drivers are updated and working (old uninstalled).
Resetting Preferences and using another Administrator account also does not work.
This is annoying, I need to do the work in 3D using computers from others and I don't understand why only this feature fails and causes such bad behavior.
Your help would be appreciated. Thank you.
Information extracted from dxdiag:
Operating System: Windows 8.1 64-bit
Memory: 8192MB RAM
DirectX Version: DirectX 11
Processor: AMD E1-2500 APU with Radeon(TM) HD Graphics (2 CPUs), ~1.4GHz
Card name: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Current mode: 1280 x 1024 (32 bit) (60Hz)
Display Memory: 4042 MB
Dedicated Memory: 1994 MB
Shared Memory: 2047 MB

Thanks for your response. Our mandatory profiles and regular local profiles are all generated from the same default user profiles, so the app data is the same. We have system restrictions set by GPO's, so perhaps it's something related to group policy?
Here is the first part of the crash log, the system's not letting me post the whole thing:
Version=1
EventType=APPCRASH
EventTime=130676361272269133
ReportType=2
Consent=1
ReportIdentifier=8b941ca2-ad68-11e4-8267-001b217dec70
IntegratorReportIdentifier=8b941ca1-ad68-11e4-8267-001b217dec70
Response.type=4
Sig[0].Name=Application Name
Sig[0].Value=Photoshop.exe
Sig[1].Name=Application Version
Sig[1].Value=15.2.2.310
Sig[2].Name=Application Timestamp
Sig[2].Value=5480338c
Sig[3].Name=Fault Module Name
Sig[3].Value=MSVCR110.dll
Sig[4].Name=Fault Module Version
Sig[4].Value=11.0.51106.1
Sig[5].Name=Fault Module Timestamp
Sig[5].Value=5098826e
Sig[6].Name=Exception Code
Sig[6].Value=c00000fd
Sig[7].Name=Exception Offset
Sig[7].Value=00000000000536cd
DynamicSig[1].Name=OS Version
DynamicSig[1].Value=6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.4
DynamicSig[2].Name=Locale ID
DynamicSig[2].Value=1033
DynamicSig[22].Name=Additional Information 1
DynamicSig[22].Value=e9f5
DynamicSig[23].Name=Additional Information 2
DynamicSig[23].Value=e9f5c8c33e4791a059633dbdb8508411
DynamicSig[24].Name=Additional Information 3
DynamicSig[24].Value=6ad1
DynamicSig[25].Name=Additional Information 4
DynamicSig[25].Value=6ad1e4ea6e8492e201dad09da2580b61

Has the Global Object Security changed

We have a form that uses a global object to work. Since Acrobat 9 and the introduction of the GOSP we have had to remind users to uncheck the "enable global object security policy" in the Javascript section of preferences.
Recently this has stopped working, the code still fails with a "InvalidSetError: Set not possible, invalid or unknown."
what;s going on?
can I re-enable the global objects maybe with a registry hack?

Thanks for getting back to me, I have sorted the issue (hopefully)
there are three sets of fields that form a date selector they all end in the same two digit number to identify them (which set on which page) this two digit ident is saved to a global variable so that the scripts that then make the day, month and year selector fields un-hide etc
anyway, it turned out that the first set was the one that failed, the other two on the page worked fine. So I deleted set 1 and copied set 2 and placed them where set 1 was, it all worked fine so I just renamed the fields back to set 1 and all was still ok.
The odd thing is that this issue has been there since the first version of the form in 2010 but has only now chosen to surface.
this is the code that the button uses
var fieldExtension = event.target.name.substring(event.target.name.length -2, event.target.name.length)
global.dateField = "date" + fieldExtension
if (this.getField("day" + fieldExtension).display == display.hidden){
showDate()
}else{
hideDate()
Anyway, all sorted

Need one global object constructed ahead of others

We are working on porting an application from a Lynx
environment to Solaris using the Forte 6 development
tools. We're having a problem when a constructor for
one object tries to use a global object created in a
library file. The application uses an SLogFile class
to write warning messages to a particular destination.
This is specified in a source file called config.cpp like
so:
SLogFile _slog(fileno(stderr), SLogFile::warn);
SLogFile &slog = _slog;
config.cpp is compiled into config.o, which is then
stored in libclass.a.
In program testprog.cpp, we define a new class
whose constructor wants to use slog to write
output. I think the following simplification explains
what the application is trying to do.
extern SLogFile &slog;
class test {
public:
test(int val);
~test();
private:
int prival;
test::test(int val)
prival=val;
slog << "Initial value set to " << prival << "\n";
test testcritter;
int main(int argc, char** argv)
slog << "Count of arguments to main = " << argc << "\n";
return 0;
Through dbx, I can stop the program when it enters
test::test. slog points to slog, but slog is not
initialized. According to the documentation, this
can be resolved in g++ by the use of the load command
to get config.o loaded first (apparently getting _slog
constructed). Is there anyway to get this to happen
in the Solaris/Forte C++ environment?
Any help would be appreciated...

We are working on porting an application from a Lynx
environment to Solaris using the Forte 6 development
tools. We're having a problem when a constructor for
one object tries to use a global object created in a
library file. The application uses an SLogFile class
to write warning messages to a particular destination.
This is specified in a source file called config.cpp like
so:
SLogFile _slog(fileno(stderr), SLogFile::warn);
SLogFile &slog = _slog;
config.cpp is compiled into config.o, which is then
stored in libclass.a.
In program testprog.cpp, we define a new class
whose constructor wants to use slog to write
output. I think the following simplification explains
what the application is trying to do.
extern SLogFile &slog;
class test {
public:
test(int val);
~test();
private:
int prival;
test::test(int val)
prival=val;
slog << "Initial value set to " << prival << "\n";
test testcritter;
int main(int argc, char** argv)
slog << "Count of arguments to main = " << argc << "\n";
return 0;
Through dbx, I can stop the program when it enters
test::test. slog points to slog, but slog is not
initialized. According to the documentation, this
can be resolved in g++ by the use of the load command
to get config.o loaded first (apparently getting _slog
constructed). Is there anyway to get this to happen
in the Solaris/Forte C++ environment?
Any help would be appreciated...

Global object in transformation

Hi all,
I'm plannin to declare an object of an ABAP class not in the start routine but in the global section of the transformation in order to generate the object only once (the constructor shall be only called once in order to save time). Within the start routine every single data record shall trigger a method for that object.
My question is: Do you see any problems when different packages are running in parallel, i.e. we have one single object of a class for which a method is called serval times at the same time because of parallel processing of packages.
Best regards
Markus

Hi Markus,
It is not necessary that you need to create the object in the Global declaration.
make the declaration for that object in the start routine itself.
While creating the object just make a check as the following code.
If <object name> IS INTIAl.
CREATE Object <object name>.
Endif.
This will create teh object only once during the entire run for the different data packages as well and your contructor will be called only once during the entire loading process.
Prathish

Urgent - Global Objects

Hi All,
Actually I am in a big trouble , I began my first project in java and I need an answer for the following q.
1) - I need a global object to be seen from other objects
for the same user in the runtime for specific object??.
2)- I need a global object to be seen from other objects for all users in the runtime . I am trying to catch users to not enter in different sessions.
thanx in advance, your help is deeply appreciated.

I am sorry, I didn't read your original post as carefully as I should have. Using the Singleton pattern will work for objects that must be seen by multiple objects running within a single instance of a JVM.
For "global" objects to be reached from several instances of a JVM -- your second question -- there are a few techniques that you can use. It really does depend on the solution you are trying to create, however.
Are you attempting to expose just a single object, or want to expose many different objects, all of which will be globally accessible to other cliens? J2EE provides the solution and mechanisms to do either of the above; for a single object, I would suggest using JNDI, wheras the second would warrant using EJBs perhaps. (EJBs actually do use JNDI, but is a bit less manual and is a better solution if you have a need to expose multiple objects.)
Providing an overview of either of the aforementioned technologies would be overkill for a single post. Check out http://java.sun.com/j2ee for more information on them.

Any issue and/or advice with activation of global password policy (10.9 osx server) ?

Hi Pro,
I have an OD domain (10.9.1 server) with 20 users mobile account (10.9.1 osx) authentification, I’d like to enable a global password policy, and I'm curious what actually happens when I add some policy in Server Admin > Open Directory > gear > edit global password policy?
If I set a "reset every 45 days" option, is that from the time the policy is enabled, or from the time the user account was created?
Any issue with Keychain ?
If I set a "must have one letter" or "numeric character", etc...and the user doesn't currently have a password that matches this criteria, will they be forced to set a new password immediately, or the next time one is initiated, did the account will be disable?
I just trying to prevent any bad experience for the users.
Thanks

Hi,
The 45 days will start from the moment you enable that setting for all active users, and will start whenever you create a new OD user.
There won't be any issues with Keychain, it will updated when a new password is set. On that specific day when they login or restart, they need to choose a new password. Keychain will update automatically.
The new policy will start working after the 45 days have been set. After 45 days that policy will be enforced, not before, users can continue to work with a less secure password. About 10 days before that deadline or earlier they will get an option in their login screen to renew their password because it will inform them it will expire soon.
You might want to notify all users of a new password policy when you set it and then inform them again about a week before it will expire. That will ensure a smooth transition...
Goodluck!
Jeffrey

Create Global Object Policy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for