Created join over 2 business areas

There is a business with a join. This join has a master table (table is inside this business area) and a detail table from another business area. How can I find the name of that other business area?

Hi,
Well, your detail folder may be in lots of business areas, as a folder can be mapped into many business areas. You will have to go to Tools->Manage Folders and search for the folder in the By Folder tab. This will show you the related business areas.
Rod West

Similar Messages

  • How to create a Fixed Asset Business Area that is restricted to a ledger

    Hello gurus,
    I am having trouble creating a Fixed Asset Business Area that will only restrict users to use only one type of ledger in Discoverer Admin. How do you go about this?
    I know how to create the business area but not sure how to restrict it.
    Any guidance is much appreciated.
    Thank you.
    -Nelly

    Hi,
    You can restrict users to using one type of ledger by adding mandatory conditions to the folders in the in the business area. The conditions can be dependent on the user and/or responsibility so that different users/responsibilities have access to different ledgers. These mandatory conditions do not show in the workbook and cannot be changed by the Disco plus/desktop user.
    Rod West

  • Error while creating a folder in business area

    hi all,
    I am trying to create a folder in a business area using View.It is giving me the following error.
    View contains no items,folder will not be created.
    May i know the reason why it is prompting this error?
    There are items in EUL and i also checked in the backend as well.
    Thanks in advance
    kiran

    Hi Rod west,
    Thanks 4 replying me.
    But i dont have any columns with timestamp.
    I have columns with date,number and varchar.i unchecked the date and then tried creating a folder.
    But still the problem persists
    can u please tell me ,What else may be the problem?
    Thank u
    kiran.
    Edited by: user589042 on Sep 29, 2008 2:40 AM

  • A/c doc not created and error msg "Business Area Miss-Match Check input"

    Hi,
    After creation of new Plant and Business area create a invoice , But my accounting document does't created and error msg show "Business Area Miss-Match Please Check Your Input". plz suggest me.
    Regards,
    Sohail

    Dear Sohail Rahman,
    Looks like the Business area has not been properly assigned.
    Business area can be created for three combinations:
    1. Business area by sales area
    2. Business area by plant and division
    3. Business area by plant and item division
    In your case, check whether the business area is maintained for the combination of plant/division and plant/item division.
    Hope this helps
    Thanks
    Murtuza

  • Business Area while creating Sales Order

    Hi everyone,
    I have the following error in creating sales order:
    "No business area can be determined for item 000010"
    The business area is assigned to my plant and division.
    Any ideas???
    Regards,
    Edited by: Smitha Kaikela on Apr 30, 2008 2:03 AM

    Thank You so much for your replies. I thought I had done the business area step, but I was indeed missing a small config.
    Anyways that is done but am still not able to create my Sales Order.
    Pricing Error: Mandatory Condition MWST is missing.
    I defined a condition record (VK11) for MWST and also defined the pricing procedure for my sales area with MWST.
    But the sales order still gives the same error. I tried logging out and creating it again, but no good
    Please help
    Rgds,

  • Proper use of one table in different business areas

    Hi
    We will be using certain DB tables in several business areas and we are more than one person to define them.
    If a table is loaded from the database for each of the business areas it will be numbered 'table 1, 2...' which does't seem very desirable. Also I'd rather define hiearchies only once and for all.
    If a table is loaded only once and used for all the business areas all the joins which are necessary in the different business areas are shown. This will be confusing. If one of us considers a certain join unnecessary he might accidentially delete the wrong one belonging to a different business area.
    Exporting the business areas including the joins regularly is probably not a great help if afterwards new joins for other business areas were added.(?)
    Am I misunderstanding the concept of Discoverer?
    How do you handle such a situation?
    Advice appreciated
    Franziska

    Hi Michael, et al,
    I'm just planning my EUL and your comments in the last post seem relevant.
    My general plan is as follows:
    (1) Create a BaseMaster BA which is used to bring and tables/views from the database into disco. The folders in here will be created with "New Folder from database" and be fairly straightforward, with only very simple calculations and no aggregations in calculations. The joins will echo the joins in the underlying database. This is not shared with Users.
    (2) Create a CustomMaster BA which contains Custom Folders which consist of various SQL views of the database. The SQL in these may use have some more complex calculations and these calculations may include aggregation. This will not be shared with users.
    (3) Create a CentralMaster BA which contains Complex Folders which are assembled from items from the BaseMaster BA and the CustomMaster BA. These folders may include more complex calculations and the calculations may include aggregated items.
    (4) Create a number of User BA's. Using Manage Folders, share the relevant Folders from the Central Master.
    I've got a few questions relating to this.
    (a) Custom Folders based on Folders
    It would seem nice to me if it were possible to create Custom Folders which were based on other Folders, rather than Database Views. Then, even if you need a view and a complex transformation of that view in your business area, you still only have one place where the EUL brings that view into disco. My understanding is that this is not possible. Am I right? I suppose there could be an argument that complex transformations should be pushed back to the DBA but it seems reasonable to me that sometimes this sort of thing could be within the remit of the disco admin?
    (b) SQL Efficiency
    Am I right in thinking that generally a complex folder is usually not much less efficient than using a base folder because the SQL interpreter ends up optimising the SQL?
    And a last question which has turned out rather complex - by all means ignore it if you like - it's me getting to grips with the process.
    (c) Nested Complex Folders
    I presume that if a transformation is needed which would in a normal database environment would need a mainquery and a subquery, then this could be done in a
    number of ways (adhering to the above methodology) by:
    (i) Get the DBA to write a view which does both mainquery and subquery and then bring into the BaseMaster and then straight into the CentralMaster folder.
    (ii) Get the DBA to write the subquery, bring this into the BaseMaster and then implement the mainquery in the CentralMaster.
    (iii) Create a Folder in CustomMaster which implements both mainquery and subquery and then bring this into the CentralMaster folder.
    (iv) Create a Folder in the CustomMaster which implements just the subquery and then implement the main query in the Central Master.
    If you've got this far - thankyou for baring with me.
    Perhaps there's something written about this sort of thing or maybe it's just a matter of practice!
    Any thoughts on all this would be much appreciated.
    Kind regards
    Suhada

  • Is business area and industry sector are same.

    Hi All,
       is company code  is related to industry sector in any way??? 
    is industry sector related thro business area then, or  is business area and industry sector are one and the same.
    Thanks
    Sathsih

    Dear Satish,
    Business Area - Organizational unit of external accounting that corresponds to a specific business segment or area of responsibility in a company. Movements in value entered in Financial Accounting are assigned to business areas.
    Financial statements can be created for business areas for internal purposes.
    The definition of the business area organizational unit is optional.
    Business areas are used in external segment reporting (over and above company codes), based on the significant areas of operation of a company (for example, product lines, branches).
    To define business areas, choose the following in Customizing for the Enterprise Structure: Definition -> Financial Accounting -> Define Business Area.
    If you have defined business areas, the transaction figures for the G/L accounts are managed separately for internal evaluation purposes. You can therefore create internal financial statements for business areas.
    If you want to create financial statements for business areas, you must make sure that the Business area field is ready for input in all the line items. To do this, proceed as follows in Customizing for Financial Accounting: Financial Accounting Global Settings -> Business Area -> Enable Business Area Balance Sheet.
    To post items in a business area, enter the business area when you enter the business transaction. However, the business area can also be derived from other account assignments, such as the cost center. To enable the system to do this, you must define the business area in the cost center master record.
    If you enter a cross-company code document, you can post to different business areas across all company codes in one document. As a result, any number of combinations of company code and business area are possible.
    Industry Sector - When you create a material master record, you are required to classify the material according to industry sector and material type.
    The standard system contains the following industry sectors. The ID used to identify the industry sector internally appears in parentheses.
    ·        Plant engineering and construction (A)
    ·        Chemical industry (C)
    ·        Mechanical engineering (M)
    ·        Pharmaceuticals (P)
    The other sectors are for retail.
    Regards,
    Naveen.

  • Customisd err message at MIRO - Business area V/s company code validation

    Hi experts,
    We have simple validation for company code V/S Business area check in place ,
    While doing MIRO system throws error for a particular company code and Business area
    combination the set error message ( customized - Business are does not match with company code)
    This validation has given as a sub node (step) of another consolidation trx. types against GL validation (that was in place earlier, thats why)
    But when we do through F-02 (Journal entry ),F-43(vendor invoice), F-22(customer invoce) for the same combination system passes the entry !!!
    what may be the cause ?
    the error message is the standard one set -251 this message is custom created at Validation (GGB0)
    Business area doesnt belongs to the company code
    Message no. /ASU/GENERAL251
    One more thing Noticed
    The Material PO is a account assigned (K) cost center and the
    cost center Business area is 1003.
    In PO plant is 1003 and i checked the MSEG the plant shows 1003
    But in Logistics assignment the Business area 1001 is tagged to Plant 1003
    not THE BUSINESS AREA 1003 !! . I mean at plant/valuation area to Business ara configuration
    the valuation area 1003 is assigned to Business are 1001 not to Busienss are 1003!!!
    Edited by: melgibson on Feb 15, 2012 1:42 PM
    Edited by: melgibson on Feb 15, 2012 1:43 PM

    Hi
    thankx for the reply,
    there is no exit/ set for validation here
    I have done like this
    Pre requisite
    company code = xxxxx
    Check
    Business area = xxxx or BA = XXXXXX or  BA = XXXXX  ......
    Message
    E           Message class     /ASU/GENERAL
    251
    Business area doesnt belongs to the company code
    Message variables
    1 BSEG       - GSBER
    The t codes like F-43 AND f-02  1003 cc TO  1003 BA is perfectly working !!! our problem is at MIR7/MIRO
    only there the error pops up even the combination is allowed in the above mentioned validation??
    Edited by: melgibson on Feb 15, 2012 2:03 PM
    Edited by: melgibson on Feb 15, 2012 2:04 PM

  • Cost centre without business area

    Hi All,
    I have document splitting with business area and profit centre mandatory, along with this i have configured business area wise FSV in OBY6.
    We have  configured 10 business areas and 5 profit centres, but i have  created cost centres without business area and i dontwant to create cost centres with business area becoz junk master data in system and no control to users. also i have done configuration in OKB9 for automatic posting expences account with the combination of valuation area-business area- & cost centre, but when we are posting any financial document though MM or SD transactions like PGI or MIGO for service, system is not allowing to post financial document without business area cost centres. Error "Business Area XXXX / Cost centre XXXX is not assigned".
    After all analysis i came to know that, if we have cost centre with business area then only we can move with this set of configuration. Is it right?
    In No. what need to be done. basically we dont want to create cost centres for all Business Area
    Thanks in Advance,
    Sahil

    Hi,
    If you are not ready to maintain BA in CC master you should write Substitution / you should maintain derivation rule for deriving business area.
    Regards,
    Viswa

  • Business area default in asset master record

    Dear all
    Here is one ticket pertains to asset
    when i create asset master record business area will be defaulted
    the problem is when i upload asset master record through LSMW
    by different business area the system throws a error message BUSINESS AREA EXISTS WHICH CANT BE REPLACED THROUGH LSMW
    This is happening for all the asset classes
    so i want to remove that default business area from where should i remove that which t-code or menu path
    regards ravindra kumar

    Dear ravinagh
    removing of business area in asset master record is always possible but
    see when u  r uploading bulk asset master records through LSMW we cant replace the business area  as it is already defaulted in asset master record
    means some where we have assigned  the default values to the asset classes or some other master record
    so we have to find out the source of the defualt business area for asset master record
    when we remove this from the asset classes then the business area will not be defaulted so that we can upload assets from LSMW with different business area
    so please try to find out the source....................
    regards
    ravindra kumar

  • Business Area should be defined

    Hi
    I proposed that each location (branches) of my client should be defined as an profit center (for getting trial balance at business area level).
    But my client is insisting for creating location as a business area and not profit center.
    But i think business area concept is obsolete in SAP ECC6.0. I believe that the SAP has stop providing support for business area.
    I want to show the OSS note or some link on the basis of which i can tell that it is better to use profit center than business area.
    Please help where i can get this link or OSS note

    Meenu,
    I can't speak for what SAP will support/improve in the future.  You can raise a message with SAP if you have doubts. ECC6 has improved functionality that reduces the need for Business area reporting, but I have never heard that SAP does not intend to support. 
    Use of Business Area is optional, but it is definitely supported in ECC6.  And, ECC6 will be in 'standard' maintenance until end of 2015, extended maintenance until end of 2017.  Will your consulting contract last longer than that?
    At the end of the day, if the client wants it, and it solves his business requirements, and it is currently available, then why shouldn't you accommodate him?
    Best Regards,
    DB49

  • Business Area not flowing automatically in Shipment Cost document

    Hi there,
    In transportation module, while creating shipment cost document, business area is not flowing automatically. Upon more exploration we found that plant is also not flowing, and may be because of that business area is not flowing. What can the posible reasons for plnt not flowing? Suggest solution.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Deepshikha

    Dear Deepshikha,
    Please check the Assign purchasing data settings in T_53 transaction with the combination of the plant.
    Through this setting plant will flow in the shipment cost document.
    I don't have idea about where the businees area field avail in the shipment cost document.
    If so please chek the settings related to business area through this IMG path.
    SPRO>IMG>Enterprise structure>Assignment>Business Area Account Assignment.
    Define Rules By Sales Area
    If Rule 1 is assigned then
    Assign Business Area To Plant And Division
    If Rule 2 is assigned then
    Assign Business Area by Sales Area.
    I hope it will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • P&L Statement business area wise

    Dear Experts,
    we have a scenario like below..
    we have defined the document splitting with two characteristics 1. Business area  2. Profit center.and  we have created Plant as a Business area.
    we have two plants like Plant A, Plant B, Plant A is Manufacturing Plant, B is Trading Plant, Production is happening at Plant A, and we are transferring the stock to Plant B which is trading Plant, i am doing STO from Plant A to Plant B with two step Procedure with Movement type 641
    Account Entry like below
    Plant A Stock CR (Plant A Business Area)
    Plant B Stock DR (Plant B Business Area)
    Clearing A/c  DR (Plant A Business Area)
    Clearing A/c CR (Plant B Business Area)
    Please can you suggest to take the P&L Statement for Both the Plants.
    Rgds,
    Naru

    Hi Naru,
    You want to take P&L statement BA wise, if yes then use the t.code.S_ALR_87012284 and here there is a option business area. You can use this option.
    Regards,
    Mukthar

  • CO Validation check Business Area

    Hi gurus, so my request is to give me solution about my validation.
    i wish skip business area to be fill in field - business area in KS01.
    My validation is:
    Prerequisite:  Controll. area = '1000'
    Check:Company Code IN COMPANYCODES (set all company codes ) AND not Business Area in BA(set all
    Business Area)
    Message: error (e)
    but nothing happend - what i create wrong? my business area is activ in company codes.

    Srinivas is right. The validation only works when a CO document is being created due to a posting or allocation and not at the point of filling in master data. If you have business area active in your company code then you must include a business area. I think the best you can do in this case is to either deactivate the business area in company or create a dummy business area.
    Regards,
    Kenneth

  • Business Area in Contract(ES22) is blank on move-out cancellation though IC Web

    Hi expert,
    Need help in finding the root cause for the below scenario:
    During move-in through IC-Web, business area field is getting populated in ECC at contract level(ES22).
    Then we create a move-out, business area field still remains.
    But when we cancel the move-out, this business area field becomes blank.
    Business Area Field name in ES22:
    EVERD-GSBER
    I tried putting RFC trace but not able to find any relevant program.
    Please let me know if you have come across this type of issue or atleast give me some pointer?
    Appreciate your help.
    regards,
    vicky

    Check out thid badi for move out.
    ECSBTO02
    You can add user defined checks here. I think this will solve your purpose.
    Edited by: nivedita_mumbai on Mar 23, 2010 11:33 AM

Maybe you are looking for