CRM_COPY_BADI For Followup Transaction

Hi,
I am currently trying to copy one field from the interaction record in teh IC Webclient to a followup transaction. (These transactions are both business activities).  I believe the field I want to copy is in the SUBJECT method.  I have created an implementation for this BADI and assigned my own 9ALL filter to it.  I have created a system break point in method "SUBJECT".  When I create a follow up transaction I can't hit the break-point.   Can sombody shed some light on how I can test this copy control?
thanks.
Jamie
Edited by: Jamie Bullen on May 6, 2008 2:37 PM

Right, that makes sense.  Here goes my explaination just to make sure I have it right:
1. Obtain GUID for Source document.
2. Obtain GUID for Target document.
3. Copy ET_SERVICE_OS info from Source to Target.  Maintain Target Document.
(Does it matter which method this is done in using the BADI?).
Because ther isn't a BADI method for structure ET_SERVICE_OS.
thanks.
Jamie
Edited by: Jamie Bullen on May 6, 2008 4:39 PM

Similar Messages

  • Error while running a BDC for the Transaction F-02

    Hi,
           I'm getting an error <b><i>"Parking not possible during Batch Input"</i></b> while running a BDC for the transaction F-02.
           When i click on the error message it displays the message [b<i>]"In Customizing, you can control whether an error message is issued."</b></i>
            How to solve this issue?.
            Waiting for ur replies.........
    Regards
    N.Senthil

    Hi,
    When you are doing the recording in SHDB, and in the same screen where the TCODE to be recorded is given, there are options that you can choose called "Recording Parameters"...Select the checkbox which says "Not a Batch Input Session", this will set the sy-binpt variable to " "(in a recording by default it is "X")...and you will not get this error...
    Also make sure while writing the BDC program to make use of the "bdc options" parameter which has this property to switch of sy-binpt...
        Refer below theard for sample bdc code for f-02.
    https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=5126766&messageID=1538409
    Regards

  • Fields in read-only mode for BP transaction in upgrade from 4.72 to ECC6.0

    Hello,
    This is regarding the query for BP transaction in upgrade from 4.72 to ECC 6.0.
    While creating BP / Changing BP system is disabling the fields in compnay code & sales area option. There is a SAP not provided 907860; and specified that the proplem is because of the delta customizing.
    All the customization settings are as per the note. And the Synchronization Control is also activated. But still the fields are disabled only.
    I have checked the field settings also in Cross-Application-Components & Logistic-Genral.
    But these are not working for compnay code & sales area data.
    please let me know if anyone has faced this type of problem / found any solution on this.
    Best Regards,
    Shubhada

    SAP IMG  -> Cross Application Components -> Master Data Synchronization &#61664; Synchronization Control -> Synchronization Control -> Activate Synchronization options
    This setting allows you to activate synchronization of BP with R/3. Not maintaining the values may result in certain fields being read-only in BP.
    Suggested Values:
    Source Object: BP | Target Object: CUSTOMER | Active Indicator : X
    Source Object: BP | Target Object: VENDOR | Active Indicator : X
    Source Object: CUSTOMER | Target Object: BP | Active Indicator : X
    Source Object: VENDOR | Target Object: BP | Active Indicator : X
    Have you set all of the above settings??
    BHARATH

  • WIP - Job Order Pending for Completion Transaction Reprt

    How can we get report - job order pending for completion transaction from WIP module?
    Please give us solution.
    Thanks & Regards,
    PressureJet Systems Pvt. Ltd.
    Edited by: PressureJet Systems Pvt. Ltd. on Apr 7, 2013 9:57 PM

    Can you elaborate your question more?
    Mahendra

  • Error : Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and U1 exci

    I have Created Impot PO, After Planned Delivery cost MIRO I am trying to Perform GR then its giving Error "Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and U1 excise group
    Message no. 8I402"
          I have already maintained GL account in "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction" for Excise group U1
          This problem is coming when Additional Duty on custom condition type JADC is maintained in "Maintain Excise Defaults" node in the column "ADC Cond" . If I remove JADC condition type from this place the this error is not coming but AED column is not fetching any value while doing GR.
    Please help me in this issue , still No answer
    Edited by: shiwanshu singh on Jan 28, 2009 10:26 AM

    Dear sir
    For GRPO have you maintained sub transaction Type IP for your excise group U1. If you not maintained pl maintain . and assign G/L account to modvat clearing account , the G/l account should be same as company code CVD account.
    Regards
    jrp

  • Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and 58 Excise group

    Hi Experts,
    When i am doing Goods receipts for Depot for Subcontracting
    i am getting this error message .Excise modvat accounts not defined for GRPO transaction and  Excise group. For Depot no modvat. is there any configuration setting for depot. Please do needful.

    Hi,
    Please maintain
    Hi,
    go to SPRO
    Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    SPROLogistics u2013 GeneralTax on Goods MovementsIndia Account Determination  Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Enter excise group -58
    ETT_ GRPO
    and G/L account
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and excise group

    Dear Experts,
    Iam raising this question after checking all the contents related to Sub Transaction type in SDN.
    My prob is: for raw material sales scenario i have created order delivery and invoice. For Invoice i have done account determination with a different G/L in VKOA. Now i have to create an excise invoice and the accounting entry for central ED on sales should go to different G/L account. for account determination i have done the following settings:
    Maintained Sub transaction type in
    IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India -> Basic Settings
    ->Maintain Sub Transaction types
    IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India ->
    Account determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction.
    Here against DLFC sub transaction Type is maintained..
    Also
    IMG -> Logistics - General -> Tax on Goods movement -> India -> Account determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Here maintained Excise group with DLFC Company Code subtransaction type, chart of accounts and all required GL Account .
    But when the iam creating Excise Invoice in J1IIN and clicking on Subtransaction type-F4, no entries are shown. No values found is the message in green. Message no. DH801
    If i use subtransaction type and enter billing document and enter, the following error message comes:
    "Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and excise group"
    Iam unable to understand why the subtransaction type maintained is not showing in TCODE J1IIN?
    Regards

    For the error message DH801, please check note 840911
    Excise modvat accounts not defined for
           DLFC transaction and excise group"
    Please check  your G/L assignments "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction"
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Excise modvat accounts not defined for CAPE transaction and TS excise group

    Hi Guys,
    Suddenly we are facing issue during exicse invoice capturing with MIGO
    system is giving following error
    "Excise modvat accounts not defined for CAPE transaction and TS excise group
    Message no. 8I402
    While in Excise account assignment table CAPE is Linked to Modvat Clearing Account which is further liked to correct GL
    Can any one explain the cause of this issue Points will be awarded
    Regards,
    Ashish

    Hi
    Pls maintain the following:
    1. SPRO->Logistics General -> Tax on Goods Movements -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Pls note the Sub Tansaction type is IP for ETT CAPE.
    ETT  <b>Sub Trn Type</b>   DC Ind                Account Name
    CAPE     IP           CR Credit     ONHOLD CENVAT on hold account
    CAPE     IP           DR Debit     ONHOLD CENVAT on hold account
    CAPE     IP           DR Debit     RG23AED RG 23 AED account
    CAPE     IP           DR Debit     RG23BED RG 23 BED account
    CAPE     IP           DR Debit     RG23SED RG 23 SED account
    CAPE       IP                   DR Debit             RG23ECS RG 23 ECS account
    2. SPRO->Logistics General -> Tax on Goods Movements -> India -> Account Determination -> Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Check the G/L accounts for Excise Transaction Type CAPE and maintain the same G/L accounts for ETT CAPE with <b>Sub Trn Type IP</b>.
    Hope this clarifies.
    Thanks

  • Error - Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and 01 exci

    Dear All,
    Getting below error while  doing J1IIN - Posting Excise invoice for Sale.
    "Excise modvat accounts not defined for DLFC transaction and 01 excise group"
    I checked with the settings GL are assigned to for DLFC and 01 excise group.
    Is anywhere else I need to mantain the modvat GL
    Regards,
    Rakesh

    Check if you are using any subtransaction type along with excise transaction type.
    Excise group, ETT, company code, sub transaction type (if any), Chart of account, Modvat account (pls maintain all the entries over here) search for modavat clearing field and maintain it.
    BR
    Edited by: Sujoy on Jan 15, 2010 9:45 AM

  • Running BDC program in background for the transaction VL02N

    Hi All,
    I have coded a BDC program (call transaction method) for the transaction code VL02N. I can able to run the program manually & successfully. But if I execute the program in background(SM36), it is going to dump giving CNTL_ERROR.
    Note: I am not using any of the GUI_UPLOAD, GUI_DOWNLOAD funciton modules in the program. But I am using the FTP command funtion modules like( FTP_COMMAND, FTP_CONNECT, FTP_DISCONNECT and FTP_SERVER_TO_R/3).
    <removed_by_moderator>
    Thanks in advance.
    Ramesh.
    Edited by: Julius Bussche on Jul 8, 2008 5:55 PM

    VL02N is an enjoy transaction. You cant run it in background. Please try VL02.
    Thanks
    Romit

  • View for PAYROLL transactions

    I am working on a drilldown Report where by I need to generate ALL detailed transaction for a particular period.
    I found some views useful for some modules like XLA_AR_INV_AEL_GL_V,XLA_AR_INV_AEL_GL_V a,XLA_AR_REC_AEL_SL_V etc .
    I am not able to locate the view for PAYROLL transactions.
    I actually need a view that holds ALL the transactions posted for PayRoll in details Such as : Desc-"Salary for John for Jan" Dr"40,000". I would have taken my information from the journals(Gl_je_headers and Gl_je_lines) but that, is not detail enough.
    I notice for other modules Similar view start with "XLA_" exist.
    It is very Urgent.
    Thank You.

    I am working on a drilldown Report where by I need to generate ALL detailed transaction for a particular period.
    I found some views useful for some modules like XLA_AR_INV_AEL_GL_V,XLA_AR_INV_AEL_GL_V a,XLA_AR_REC_AEL_SL_V etc .
    I am not able to locate the view for PAYROLL transactions.
    I actually need a view that holds ALL the transactions posted for PayRoll in details Such as : Desc-"Salary for John for Jan" Dr"40,000". I would have taken my information from the journals(Gl_je_headers and Gl_je_lines) but that, is not detail enough.
    I notice for other modules Similar view start with "XLA_" exist.
    It is very Urgent.
    Thank You.

  • Error while Installing Oracle Services for Microsoft Transaction Server

    I downloaded "Oracle9i Database Release 2 Enterprise/Standard/Personal Edition for Windows NT/2000/XP" and installed the personal edition. It did not install successfully and gave this error message:
    Error while Installing Oracle Services for Microsoft Transaction Server
    The specified key was not found while trying to GetValue
    - stop installation of all products.
    - stop installation of this component only.
    The installation of Oracle 9i Database was unsuccessful
    The Integration tools and client installed just fine from the same download. Why didn't the database install successfully? All the other components seemed to install just fine and the database appeared to be created - but I could not open it and there was not start menu option for DBA Studio.
    I am running Windows 2000 professional with Service Pack 3 on a 2 GHz Pentium4 machine with 512MB Rambus RAM, 32bit color graphics ATI All-in-Wonder card, about 40GB of disk space, a local peer-to-peer network via cat5 cable to another Win2k P3 machine, and Creative Soundblaster Audigy card. Do I need to adjust any network settings? Would it help or hinder if I installed MS IIS? WinNT has a Microsoft Transaction Server (MTS) but Win2k has COM+ instead; does that make a difference in terms of the installer looking for MTS? Do I need to configure COM+ in some special way / change settings?

    HI Salman,
    I am doing the following.
    1. I am installing Oracle 10.2.01 Database(Not Client) on my windows Xp laptop. While installation i Choose the custom option and Check the Oracle Windows Interface. In that i check the "Install Oracle Services for Microsoft Transaction server" checkbox. The installation goes on fine till 99% and when it tries to install the
    Oracle Services for Microsoft Transaction server it gives an error saying that "Microsoft Transaction server" was not found on the system.
    I had previously installed the same on my laptop and it was working fine. but after uninstallation when i try to re install i get this problem.
    If i go to the services.msc option in windows i still see the OracleMTSRecoveryService option even when i have uninstalled oracle. But when i try to start the services i get the following error
    Could Not start the OracleMTSRecoveryService on the local computer.
    Error 3: The system cannot find the file specified.
    Any help on how to resolve this issue will be highly appreciated

  • To Find Include for Enhancement for Particular Transaction

    Hi Friends,
    Could You Plz assist me...
    How to find out the User Exit for Particular Transaction.
    Like for ME23N, we have a Include RV64A701     OR       for VA01, we have the include MV45AFZZ and so on for every Transaction, which we believe as the User Exits.
    Plz let me know, How to find out these Includes apart knowing from Configuration Part.
    Thanks Alot

    Hi,
    1. In the transaction go to : system->status-> <PROG. NAME>
    2. after getting the program name go to SE37 , type EXIT<PROG NAME> and press F4 to get the list of function exits available.
    once you get the exit you should also be able to find the include name using the where used list, just select the exit and click where used list.
    rgds,
    venu.

  • Free Goods Determination for other transaction types

    Hi,
    Does anybody know of any Function Modules or Class names that determines Free Goods determination in a Sales Order? We are thinking if this functionality could be mimicked for other transaction types?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    please consider the sap online help:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm700_ehp03/helpdata/en/b7/4a893a8729337be1
    0000000a11402f/frameset.htm
    Check the function moduls:
    Event CRM_FREE_GOODS_ADD_ITEM_EC
    CRM_FREE_GOODS_DETERMINE_EC  >
    CALL  FUNCTION CRM_FREE_GOODS_DETERMINATION
    Best regards
    Rene

  • Performance problem for mass transactions after upgrade from 4.7 to ECC6.0

    Hi All,
    After upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 (IS-U), mass transactions such as FPY1, FPVA, FP04M are taking very long time to complete. for example, before upgrade the jobs sceduled for FPVA transaction take around 5k-6k seconds. Whereas after upgrade the jobs for FPVA with the same variant takes around 9k-10k seconds. I am unable to figure out the cause for exponential increase in the duration of several mass-jobs (after the upgrade). Are there any SAP notes or do we need to do any customizing setting to solve this problem? Does anyone face this kind of problem?
    Thanks in advance
    Taj

    Hi,
    This is normal after upgrade to 6.0, I have faced the same in all upgrades I've done and some others that I have involved also. If you did not requests and going live upgrade check I strongly recomend to schedule an Early Watch Check to minimize the impact. Times won´t be the same but can be very close if the system is tuned well. We have tuned systems that now run with good performance after this services.

Maybe you are looking for