Cross Company code posting is available for recurring payment setup?
Hi All,
I could not find the cross company code field for recurring payment setup with useing T code FBD1.
Vendor is created in paying company code 1000, however, the rent has be booked to cross company code (1001) cost center (2000).
So, while trying to do recurring payment setup, I could not see the field.
I know the alternative option that i can use the "Cost Center(1000)" is assigned to CoCd 1000 and do recurring setup without useing cross company code, later i can post the manual journal for correction (as below), however, I do not want use this option.
Dr/Cr CoCd GL account Cost Center Amount
Dr 1001 Rent account 2000 XXXXX
Cr 1000 Rent account 1000 XXXXX
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Thanks,
Srinivas
Hi, ok17 is not for cross company,but for CO-FI real time integration.
Ex. you maintained for "RKL Actual activity allocation" Dr 123 Cr 567
Then while posting activity allocation in CO you'll get posting like Dr 123 Cr 567 (with corresponding CO objects)
Similar Messages
-
BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST- Cross Company-Code Posting problem
Hi,
I am using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST in a program to post a GL document.
The program works fine for single company code posting.
For <b>cross company-code posting</b>, i.e. when my upload file contain more
than 3 company code,
The document gets posted and uploaded in SAP but the posting result i.e
for clearing accounts is incorrect.(clearing accounts of post in company is not generated)
FYI, There is <i>no error message returned from BAPI</i>.
Am I possible to do this with bapi, so I have to split my doc and post
it pro company code?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
HikarunoHi,
It seems the G/L account is a reconcillation account..Try with another G/L account and see.
Regards,
Nagaraj -
hi
while posting cross company code posting in F-02 for customer,the open item is not cleared
ex: com.code:1000 have customer debit balance
the customer paid to com.code 2000
in f-02, 40 bank in com.code:2000
15 cus. in com.code:1000 has been taken in new com.code option
but open item is not cleared?
how can i post?
next in company code 1000- 2000 company balance will be there and same com.code 2000 also will have 1000 com.code balance , how can i clear this
regard
sowmyayou can use F-30 for the clearing at the same time as the posting.
But it may be better to have the repsonsible person in the customer's company to do the clearing, so he/she knows the payment has been received (although in the same company).
Current accounts between companies should be "cleared" at regular intervals. ie. offsett asset & liabitily side. It's a business decision on when to clear the balances. -
Cross-company code posting BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST number range
When I use BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST for cross-company code - I put the first company code in the header and first line item and the second company code in the second line item.
This posts - however there is a BIG problem with the document numbers it posts:
1. It posts <b>both</b> company codes using the number range of the second company code.
2. It updates NRIV for only the second company code.
How do I get this to work properly and post with the correct number range for the first company code.Not sure if this applies to you or not - check Note OSS 419588 - Distributing cash discount base amounts in tax calculation.
-
Cross-Company code posting Error
Hi Experts,
When I am trying to Post an intercompany transaction facing an error "A unique company code has not been assigned to company number XXXX"
Scenario:
1. Company code 1 debit
2. company code 2 credit
In simulation I can see the line items as below
Cocd PK GL Acct Amount
IN01 40 1 100 Expense acct
IN02 50 2 100 Expense Acct
IN02 40 3 100 Inter comp clerg acct
IN01 50 4 100 Inter Comp Clerg Acct.
but still above said error message is pops up:
rgd
YJHai Ravi,
Thanks for the link,
From the document split settings i can able to post an Inter-co document and that is : Expense of company code 1 to Expense of Company Code2. But In case of Vendor invoice (F-43) - Liability for Comp code 1 and Expense for Comp Code 2. In vendor case scenario I am still facing the same error.
My doubt on this error is how the line item of Comp code 1 can derive the profit Center (PC1) information when entry is as below:
Trnsct Compcode Amt Profit Center
Vendor 1 10000
Expesne 2 10000 PC2
Your suggestion or assistance on this is highly appreciated.
rgd
YJ -
Cross company code posting in assessment cycle
Friends,
I developed one assessment cycle to send from Cost center A ( company code A with USD) to Receiver cost centers B ( company code B with CAD) and Cost center C ( Company Code A and USD), When I do the assessment cycle and check the details it is showing me 100% taken out of sender and assessed to B and C. But when I check cost center report of Cost center A, the credit is not same as the debits ( i made the cycle to take out 100%). When i drilled down in the credits ( sent from assessment cost element), I see object currency to be different from transaction currency ( should be the amount that needs to be credited) even though Object and transactions currencies are in USD.
Any input on why object currency value will be different from transaction currency value even though both are in USD? Is it something because of cross company posting with different currencies? Thanks in advanceHi,
check SAPNET note 549430 it describes the system beahivour and what you can do.
BR Christian -
CROSS COMPANY CODES POSTING - OBYA
Dear Experts ,
Can you plese tell me
1] when we post F-02 debit for AAAA company code and credit for BBBB company code , it generates 4 line items
my question is this will shows in open item when we post in F-02 , then how to clear this docments to show in cleared items
Thanks in advance for resolving my problem
Regards
BhaskarHi,
This company codes will be created with open item managed gl accounts in each of the company codes.
Using F-03 you can clear these GL accounts whenever there is an offsetting entry posting.
Regards,
Krishna Kishore -
Prevent cross-company code postings for certain document type
Hi all!
I am looking for a possibility to prevent users from posting a "cross-company code posting" just for a certain document type.
I checked validation rules and BTEs but without success. Do you have an idea?
Thanks for any support.
MichaelThanks for your reply. I have already tried to use a validation rule, but without success.
It did not work as the relevant field "New company code" (NEWBK) in not part of BKPF or BSEG, but (only) of structure RF05A. Thus, I cannot use the field in a validation rule.
Or is there a way to make RF05A fields available for use in validation rules?
Regards, Michael -
Cross company code downpayment posting error
Hi,
When I am posting cross company code downpayment in F-48 getting below error.
"Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled".
Vendor A/c (Company A)
Bank clearing A/c(Company B) - Profit center 25000
Problem it is not deriving the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c. I have used document type KZ, check boxes "intercompany postings" and "trading partner" are activated in this document type.
Default profit center has made for Bank clearing A/c and Cross company code clearing A/c. Assigned Profit center 25000 for Company A also.
Kindly advice where I am wrong, which is the correct document type to post the Cross company code transactions (Down payment:F-48, charging-off GL open item to Vendor) to derive the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c? Or
How can I configure in New GL that the profit center should get derived from the Cross company code clearing A/c for above cross company code transactions?
Best regards
ShanidHi Atif,
Thanks again for your reply.
Since we have made Profit center as mandatory in New GL charactristcs this will give the priority to enter the Profit center as
Mandatory. As I mentioned earlier we required profit center in all lines.
I have tried whatever you have said, still it is not working.
It will be great if you give a solution for this.
Regards
Shanu -
Value date cross company code postings
Dear all,
it is possible to influence the value date on a company code level via the transaction OB68. With this transaction you can state that the current date is used as the default value for the value date when entering line items.This works fine when posting a G/L posting within the same company code.
When entering a cross company code posting, the indicator in transaction OB68 is ignored and the document date is used to be proposed as default value for the value date.
Does anyone know which SAP parameters can influence the value date for cross company code postings ? If this is not standard SAP possible, does anyone already encountered this problem and, if so, how did one solve this issue ?
Many thanks,
Regards,
Kristofthank you for the reply ... unfortunately I expected some Z-programmation
-
Cross-company code postings - FI validation
Hi,
We start using the cross-company code postings (transaction OBYA) between company code A and company code B and have to give authorizations both company codes to the Finance users. The idea is to have a set of G/L accounts which are allowed to be used when company code A and B are posted via cross-company code posting.
SAP recommends to implement a validation in FI to restrict the Intercompany scenatios. I attempted to create a FI validation for complete document (call-point 3) with no success:
1)
IC Rule: BSEG-BUKRS = A and BSEG-BUKRS = B and BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
Prerequisite: TRUE
Check: IC rule
Message: E- Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
When I test it, the Intercompany clearing account configured in OBYA, and which is in ACCOUNTSET, shows up in the error message, which unwanted.
2)
IC Rule 1: BKPF-BUKRS = '0017' AND BKPF-BUKRS = '0005'
IC Rule 2: BSEG-HKONT IN ACCOUNTSET
Prerequisite: TRUE
Check: IC Rule 1 --> IC Rule 2
Message: E- Account & not allowed for cross-company postings
No error message is issued at all, even if the G/L account is not in ACCOUNTSET.
Please advise what I am missing.Hi Nitin,
Thank you for your feeback.
I just wanted to clarify that the cross-company code posting is when company code A can intitiate a posting to company code B simultaneously (for example Intercompany re-charge, cash concentration, etc.). The trigger for cross-company code posting is the company code field on the line item. If company code A is in the header (BKPF-BUKRS) and at least one document line item filled up as company code B, the system created two documents for each company code, offsetting the Intercompany clearing account, configured in OBYA.
For example:
Posting via FB50: Leading company code = company code A (BKPF-BUKRS)
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200; Company code A (as a default)
Item 2: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100; Company code B (manually changed)
Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2; Amount 300; Company code A (as a default)
The systen creates two postings:
Posting 1: company code A
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 1; Amount 200;
Item 2: Credit; G/L account 2; Amount 300;
Item 2: Debit ; I/C Clearing Account; Amount 100;
Posting 2: company code B
Item 1: Debit; G/L account 1; Cost Center 2; Amount 100;
Item 2: Credit;I/C Clearing Account; Amount 100;
The only connection between the two is the cross-company code number (BKPF-BVORG), which assigned by the system once posted, as a logical connection.
I guess we could use a dedicated document type. If that's the case, how would the validation work then?
Coudl you please share more details on the BTE option?
Thank you,
Inna -
Cross company code transaction error in F-48
Dear all
I have a problem in cross company code posting. I have done all the settings like company codes are assigned to company(OX16) and i maintained gl accounts in OBYA also. When i am trying to post cross company code posting i am getting the error:
A unique company code has not been assigned to company number XXXXXX
Message no. GLT0001
Diagnosis
Document breakdown is active in your system. In certain cases, a company code is derived from the company ID number, and this must lead to the assignment of a unique company code.
A unique company code could not be assigned to company number XXXXXX.
System Response
You cannot carry out the required posting.
Procedure
Assign one company code to company number XXXXXX.
Please tel me wt setting i have to do in system.
Thanks in advance
Thanks and Regards
Girish.Hi Chandra,
Thanks for your information.
I tried in OB60 BUT still same error i am facing. we have activated document splitting .IF document splitting is deactivated then its working fine ,When document splitting is activated then we have facing this error,
If any notes or any setting please guide me.
Thanks and Regards
Girish -
Document splitting issues in Cross company code scenario
Hi
We have the following business scenario:
(Please note : Document splitting with Real time CO-FI integration is active)
1)one company(say, Co.code X) purchases on behalf of another group
company(Co.code Y)
2)the cost center of Co.code Y is given in the 'Account assignment' tab
in the Purchase order created in 'X'.
3)The PO is created in foreign currency
4)So, when the Goods receipt happens, the expense posting is happening
in Co.code Y and the GRIR entry is in X.
5)When the invoice is posted in co.code X, the Vendor Open item (in
foreign currency) gets created in X.
6)The problem occurs when Forex.valuation is done for the Vendor open
item. The Forex.gain/loss is getting posted in Co.code X by deriving
the Cost object from the expense posting in Co.code Y. Now, the system
is giving an error message 'CO object doesnt belong to X co.code'
I beleive this is the way document splitting normally works by deriving
the CO object form the original expense posting onto the subsequent
documents but I guess, it is failing in this scenario. Please let me
know if there is a work around to resolve this issue.
Regards
RaviWe normally do the independent splitting of documents in respective company codes (This being the limitation mentioned by SAP for cross company code postings).
In the document split configuration, for Define document splitting rule, check for the leading item for cross company code transactions, and check for the item categories to be edited. The following two entries will be there
1100 Company Code Clearing CC = CC of leading item
1100 Company Code Clearing CC <> CC of leading item
In case of independent splitting, remove the first entry and check.
Thanks and Regards,
Mamta Sarda -
Cross company code transcations
hai to all my loving friends
What r cross company code transcations. pls explain how this trancations r going to be done ,what r the advantages of it,pls any attachments.
[email protected]Cross company transactions means, when more than one company codes are involved in the same transaction e.g. expenses incurred in one company code but payment is made by another company code. In other words one leg of accounting entry is in one company code and another in the othe company code.
For this you need to first complete settings in t code OBYA and then you can post a cross company document using F-02 or FB50 by changing the company code for line item. T code for viewing cross company code is FBU3 and for reversal FBU8.
Award points,if usefull.
Regards
Rakesh Pawaskar -
How to break the document line items in cross company code document
Hi,
Currently the cross company code posting is summing up all the line items and posting as a single line item as long as the line items are having the same tax code.
The system will break the line items only if there are non-identical tax codes. How can i change this default behaviour to break the line items in all cases?
http://wikisend.com/download/436966/2.zipIt is the standard SAP behaviour to sum up all the identical tax code values.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Can I use a iTunes card for iTunes match?
Igot a 25 dollar iTunes gift card and I tried redeeming it for iTunes match but it wont let me it still says I need a credit card on file. Whats the deal APPLE? Can I use the gift card, if not what do I have to do?
-
Hii i have created a cluster of ring control as a strict type def.Also i have used a constant of that cluster in my program where i need.Now am changing the items in that ring control by opening the strict type def.I am giving Apply changes , save
-
How do I get U.S. iTunes in Europe?
While my Mac is fine, my XP machine recently bought the farm while I am here in Europe (go figure). Good news is that I had backed up my music from my XP machine to my Mac. Bad news is once I reformatted/reinstalled XP, and then downloaded iTunes, th
-
How do get my address book to sort/display by Last Name?
I would like my Thunderbird Address Book to display by Last Name. How can I accomplish this?
-
Hello. I have a JApplet that exchanges information with a remote server via an ObjectOutputStream (which wraps an HTTP URLConnection). When the applet is shut down, my applet must notify the servlet that the applet is shutting down. My applet has cod