CSA Rule Exception issue
Is it possible when creating an exception with the Rule Wizard to not have it create a new rule module every time a rule is created.
I would like to just add rules to an Exceptions policy that is applied to the group with out it creating a new rule module every time.
Hi Adam
Yes, it says that in the user guide and I experienced the same thing when doing it.
Part of the user guide seems a bit confusing to me though.
The 1st statement on page 10-22 in the CSA 5.2 User guide is correct:
You can create a new rule module (an "exception rule module") which
would contain the new exception rule. (This is the default and recommended choice.)
The 2nd statement is (I feel) incorrect:
"This new module would be attached to a new exception policy which is then
attached to the group(s) containing the host from which the event was received."
I've done this several times and have yet to see it create an separate exception policy
And the 3rd statement is correct:
"If you choose to create this exception module, all subsequent exception rules you
create through the wizard will be added to the same exception module and policy
if the group it is to be applied to is also the same. Therefore, a group could only
have one exception policy, but contain an exception rule module with any number
of exception allow rules created through the wizard."
Tom
Similar Messages
-
Dear SAP Gurus,
I'm facing an error when seting up web Bex in BW system which is based on AS java patch 14 when i run Diagnostics & Support Desk Tool as described in Note 937697 there is only one red signal which is BI Mastersystem
the error is
RFC connection using properties in Portal System Landscape to ABAP backend has failed. Reason:
com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception:Issuer of SSO ticket is not authorized
thanks in advance
Rgds
George Varghesethanks Deepika ,unfortunately I posted this a Long back ,time limit was very less ,we were not in a situation to do more R&D on that,it will be a Waste of time ,what I did is that I uninstall ed SAP and installed again with latest available Patches and we were succeed
thanks
George Varghese -
Flash CS6 fatal exception issue
Hello Everyone,
My flash CS6 is giving me a fatal exception issue error every time when I close it(2014-12-26_1714 - AndersonW's library). I've attached the error report here for you reference. Please kindly help.
OS: Win 8.1
Error report:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/u59ewojtpmed3bs/FlashPro%20crash%20log%20%281%29.mdmp?dl=0Reset Adobe Flash CS to default configurations
Factory Reset:
(Mac)
Double click on Adobe Flash’s icon.
Holding down the Command, Option, Shift keys quickly
When a dialog box appears, click Yes.
(Windows)
Double click on Adobe Flash’s icon.
Holding down the Ctrl+Alt+Shift keys quickly
When a dialog box appears, click Yes.
If you want to delete user configuration and preferences files manually:
Window XP – C:\Documents and Settings\<username>\Local Settings\Application Data\Adobe\Flash<version>
Window Vista & Window 7- C:\Users\<username>[AppData]\Local\Adobe\Flash<version>
Mac – Volume/Users/<username>/Library/Application Support/Adobe/Flash<version> -
Oracle Business Rule Exception during deployment
Hi Experts,
We implemented the OBR(Oracle Business Rules) within CEP and I always encounter a strange behavior. For some reason, I always encounter this error:
Apr 8, 2011 3:15:10 PM oracle.rules.rl.RuleSession logIt
SEVERE: symbol 'oracle.rules.rl.xpath.Step' is undefined
at line 1 column 12 in main
Apr 8, 2011 3:15:10 PM oracle.rules.rl.RuleSession logIt
SEVERE: UndefinedException: symbol 'oracle.rules.rl.xpath.Step' is undefined
at line 1 column 12 in main
Apr 8, 2011 3:15:10 PM oracle.rules.rl.RuleSession logIt
SEVERE: symbol 'oracle.rules.rl.xpath.Step' is undefined
at line 1 column 12 in main
Apr 8, 2011 3:15:10 PM oracle.rules.rl.RuleSession logIt
SEVERE: UndefinedException: symbol 'oracle.rules.rl.xpath.Step' is undefined
at line 1 column 12 in main
<Apr 8, 2011 3:15:10 PM PHT> <Error> <com.nsn.cvo.ingestion.callscenario.bean.OBRExecuteBean> <BEA-000000> <oracle.rules.sdk2.exception.SDKException: RUL-05187: error getting a rule session from decision point rule session pool.
>
After restarting CEP, OBR is running perfectly. I am not sure how to resolve this issue and need your guidance on how to prevent this from happening. My java source source code is below: The initializeDecisionEngine is called only once. My input to OBR is a java.util.Map(this is a requirement and can't do anything about it).
private String rulesPath;
private RuleDictionary ruleDictionary;
private DecisionPointInstance decisionPointInstance;
private String decisionFunctionName = "decisionFunctionName";
private void initializeDecisionEngine() {
try {
if (rulesPath == null) {
return;
if (decisionPointInstance == null) {
ruleDictionary = this.loadRuleDictionary(rulesPath);
DecisionPoint decisionPoint = new DecisionPointBuilder().with(
decisionFunctionName).with(ruleDictionary).build();
decisionPointInstance = decisionPoint.getInstance();
System.out.println("INIT() OUT");
} catch (SDKException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
private RuleDictionary loadRuleDictionary(String path) {
System.out.println("loading dictionary from path: " + path);
RuleDictionary dict = null;
Reader reader = null;
try {
reader = new FileReader(new File(path));
dict = RuleDictionary.readDictionary(reader, new DecisionPointDictionaryFinder(null));
List<SDKWarning> warnings = new ArrayList<SDKWarning>();
dict.update(warnings);
if (warnings.size() > 0) {
log.error("Validation warnings: " + warnings);
} catch (SDKException e) {
log.error(e);
} catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
log.error(e);
} catch (IOException e) {
} finally {
if (reader != null) {
try {
reader.close();
} catch (IOException ioe) {
ioe.printStackTrace();
return dict;
private executeOBRRule(){
Map<String, String> mapEntry = new HashMap<String, String>();
mapEntry.put("column1", "value1");
mapEntry.put("column2", "value2");
mapEntry.put("column3", "value3");
if (decisionPointInstance != null) {
decisionPointInstance.clearInputs();
// decisionPointInstance.
List<Object> list = new ArrayList<Object>();
list.add(mapEntry); <--- Adding the map to a list since it is the only allowed input for OBR, or is there any other way other than list? -->
decisionPointInstance.setInputs(list);
Object obj = decisionPointInstance.invoke(); <<<<<< this is where the exception is raised.
My question is that why is the exception is being raised and sometimes it is not. My only resolution is to restart CEP server. Am I missing something? My obr rule file is ok since it does not display any error during compilation. If you can guide me to the correct path, I will really appreciate it.
Regards,
RusselIs this problem resolved?
If so it would be greatly helpful if you could provide the solution.
Regards,
Nigel. -
SOA - BPEL with Business Rules deployment issue
I am trying to construct the Purchase Order Processing SOA sample, I am able to deploy and test with mediator, BPEL. When I tried to add business rules to the BPEL I am getting following error. can anyone please help on this?
10:47:54 AM] Creating HTTP connection to host:XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX, port:7001
[10:47:54 AM] Sending internal deployment descriptor
[10:47:54 AM] Sending archive - sca_POProcessing_rev1.4.jar
[10:48:00 AM] Received HTTP response from the server, response code=500
[10:48:00 AM] Error deploying archive sca_POProcessing_rev1.4.jar to partition "default" on server AdminServer [http://XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:7001]
[10:48:00 AM] HTTP error code returned [500]
[10:48:00 AM] Error message from server:
There was an error deploying the composite on AdminServer: Deployment Failed: Error occurred during deployment of component: ManualApprovalRule to service engine: implementation.decision, for composite: POProcessing: Error compiling fact classes.
Error while compiling fact classes for service ManualApprovalRule.
Check the underlying exception and correct the error. If the error persists, contact Oracle Support Services.
ManualApprovalRule.
[10:48:00 AM] Check server log for more details.
[10:48:00 AM] Error deploying archive sca_POProcessing_rev1.4.jar to partition "default" on server AdminServer [http://XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:7001]
[10:48:00 AM] #### Deployment incomplete. ####
[10:48:00 AM] Error deploying archive file:/D:/ORACLE_HOME/Docs&Samples/Purchase_Order_Tutorial/POProcessing/POProcessing/deploy/sca_POProcessing_rev1.4.jar
(oracle.tip.tools.ide.fabric.deploy.common.SOARemoteDeployer)Hi,
It would be helpful to others if you say which version/patch you are using.
To answer number 1, that has always been a feature of business, you don't get the option to overwrite, its always been a pain.
I have not come across issue 2 and I am sure I have imported many rules with the cross dimensional operator in them ->
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/ -
We are using Cisco Security Agent 5.1.0.79. We have 491 clients, mostly Win XP.
We have noticed that within 3 days of CSA installation on a PC, WMI quits working. If you try to connect to a PC using wmimgmt.msc, you get the message: "Failed to connect to (PC name) because <Null>: No such interface supported.
If we reset Windows security using the command: "secedit /configure /cfg %windir%\repair\secsetup.inf /db secsetup.sdb /verbose" The problem is fixed, at least temporarily.
About 45-50% of our PCs are affected.
This is a big deal for us because we use SMS for automated patching and inventory of PCs, and SMS relies heavily on WMI.
The only fix seems to be to remove CSA. Putting the host in Test Mode, or turning off security don't seem to make a difference.
Nothing that we see in the MC event log seems to be connected to the problem.
Has anyone else seen this?Thanks for your response. This issue is puzzling because the problem (WMI becoming non functional) happens even when the host is in Test Mode, or when security is set to off.
We have done some tuning to allow SMS to do inventory, install patches etc... It's mostly working, although our servers outside the DMZ are still having a few issues.
We have checked for rules not logging and haven't found that to be the issue yet.
All hosts are in a normal state when this happens. We have very few hosts that go into rootkit. It's always a false alarm when they do. That's another story...
I'm having some luck with the fix for an old bug. Evidently to fix a buffer overflow exploit, Cisco previously recommended disabling csauser.dll.
That appears to be working on some of my test boxes. Unfortunately, disabling the network shim also works some of the time.
We don't have a real clear answer yet.
Tim -
Creating Transport rule : Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation.
hi,
I'm trying to create a new transport rule and get the error
Test Auto-reply
Failed
Error:
Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation.
Exchange Management Shell command attempted:
New-TransportRule -Name 'Test Auto-reply' -Comments 'test' -Priority '0' -Enabled $true -From '[email protected]' -SentTo '[email protected]' -SubjectContainsWords 'TEST' -SetHeaderName 'Reply-To' -SetHeaderValue '[email protected]'
is this at all possible?
If so what am I doing wrong?
thanksHi,
I tested in my lab, and I received the same error. I searched and talked with my colleagues, seems like that we can’t
set header field “Reply-To” using rule, it is the same issue for header fields “To” and “From”.
Here is a related thread about header field “From” for your reference.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/430bf68b-f36b-485c-a2ef-3689b1ad826a/how-to-setup-a-transport-rule-to-change-the-from-field-of-an-email
Best regards,
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support -
We have been unable to access the business rules in out QC environment for a while. When you try to expand on them in EAS we get the error
Error logging in to Business Rules. The repository has not been configured or you are not authorized to use Business Rules.
Our dba recently upgraded the SQL server to a new machine and thought everything was ok. I just noticed in Shared Services that it still shows the old SQL server name in there. So how do we point it to the new SQL server?I thought that would take care of it but we got this error:
(Apr 26, 2010, 03:26:33 PM), org.apache.commons.httpclient.Wire, DEBUG, << "Product already exists.Registeration failed: error.generalSaveModel."
(Apr 26, 2010, 03:26:33 PM), com.hyperion.ess.EASDBConfigurator, DEBUG, Exception generated
com.hyperion.interop.lib.OperationFailedException: Product already exists.Registeration failed: error.generalSaveModel.Product already exists.Registeration failed: error.generalSaveModel.
at com.hyperion.interop.lib.helper.RegistrationHelper.register(Unknown Source)
at com.hyperion.interop.lib.CMSClient.register(Unknown Source)
at com.hyperion.ess.EASDBConfigurator.registerHBRPropFile(EASDBConfigurator.java:317)
at com.hyperion.ess.EASDBConfigurator.configure(EASDBConfigurator.java:229)
at com.hyperion.cis.config.wizard.RunAllTasksWizardAction.executeDBConfigTask(RunAllTasksWizardAction.java:282)
at com.hyperion.cis.config.wizard.RunAllTasksWizardAction.execute(RunAllTasksWizardAction.java:151)
at com.installshield.wizard.RunnableWizardBeanContext.run(Unknown Source)
(Apr 26, 2010, 03:26:33 PM), com.hyperion.ess.EASDBConfigurator, DEBUG, com.hyperion.cis.config.ProcessingException
(Apr 26, 2010, 03:26:33 PM), com.hyperion.cis.config.wizard.RunAllTasksWizardAction, ERROR, Error:
com.hyperion.cis.config.ProcessingException
at com.hyperion.ess.EASDBConfigurator.configure(EASDBConfigurator.java:252)
at com.hyperion.cis.config.wizard.RunAllTasksWizardAction.executeDBConfigTask(RunAllTasksWizardAction.java:282)
at com.hyperion.cis.config.wizard.RunAllTasksWizardAction.execute(RunAllTasksWizardAction.java:151)
at com.installshield.wizard.RunnableWizardBeanContext.run(Unknown Source)
Did we run it incorrectly? -
Bex exception issue..Very urgent
Hi,
Can any one let me know how to do the Exception for the below issue.
Only the key figures has to show Red color if required date less then current day. That means first five rows key figure values has to show red color.
Required End Date Notification Total no. notifs
3/15/2007 10043614 1
3/27/2007 10043895 1
3/29/2007 10043964 1
4/3/2007 10044018 1
8/10/2007 10044180 1
8/17/2007 10044629 1
8/9/2007 10044628 1
Overall Result 27
Thanks for the help,
Raj.Hi Eric,
This is what I am looking, if I taken required end date as key figure where I need to write the condition.
Can you please explain me clearly?
Waiting for your reply,
Raj -
Hi, I met some problems in business rules import.
1. The buisness rules import cannot be overwritten, everytime when I deployed a rule to a new environment, I need to delete the old one first. Can I do some setting to enable overwriting?
2. When the rule contains a character ">", the export xml will add a special character like "space" after it. Sometimes caused the rules failed after the deployment. Seems it is a bug.
3. When the rule has the property "hide" for some run-time prompts, sometimes it will lose after the import, is it also a bug or any workaround?
If any good suggestion or experience for the above problems? ThanksHi,
It would be helpful to others if you say which version/patch you are using.
To answer number 1, that has always been a feature of business, you don't get the option to overwrite, its always been a pain.
I have not come across issue 2 and I am sure I have imported many rules with the cross dimensional operator in them ->
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/ -
Business Rule Running issue??
I am having all the BR's in my webform Run on Save
When the rule runs on save, the rule is taking a lot of time to complete and may it is cretaing loops, may be since there are more than one rule.
And if I run that rule by double clicking the rule on the same webform it gets completed in 30-40 seconds.
I don't know what could be the issue
I don't think there is a problem in my rule because that rule runs quickly by double clicking it.
Please help!!
Recenltl I also got error opening Planning
The eror says:
Failure to connect to the Apache Bridge
No Backend server available for connention.
ThanksYou could look into setting business rules to run in the background after a set time period, this may help issues with timeouts on the web server.
Have a look at :- http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17236_01/epm.1112/hp_admin/ch02s07s05.html
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/ -
We turn on audit for business rule in both classic and EPMA planning apps. EPMA version is the same class app migrated. I checked the audit record after launching a business rule in both classic and EPMA version. In classic, the rule has type of Business Rule and New_val as the name of the rule. However in EPMA version, the rule has a type of Calc Script and New_val as the first several SET commands in the script. Why the EPMA version behave this way?
ThanksHi,
I did'nt faced any issues wile exporting using the LCM. This is actualy the best methods of exporting and importing the BRs form different environments.
You can also try exporting na dimporting the BRs from EAS console.
I dont you how you are doing it, it is hjust about selecting the artifacts take an export and import from the file system.
It is ok to copy paste if you have a few rules to export, but if you have many, then try to use one of the approach that the product provides.
Thanks,
Sourabh -
Hi all,
I created a business rule in calculation manager. Now I want to have this one in my EAS console.
I try to export my business rule from calculation manager, but when I click export some window appears and immediately disappears. So I can't do export.
What it could be? Is there any else way to export business rule to EAS Console?
Thanks in advanceHi,
I did'nt faced any issues wile exporting using the LCM. This is actualy the best methods of exporting and importing the BRs form different environments.
You can also try exporting na dimporting the BRs from EAS console.
I dont you how you are doing it, it is hjust about selecting the artifacts take an export and import from the file system.
It is ok to copy paste if you have a few rules to export, but if you have many, then try to use one of the approach that the product provides.
Thanks,
Sourabh -
Hi,
We have our system on 9.3.0.1 and I am currently facing a strange issue.
I have a set of rules that I have added to an existing sequence. Now I want these rules to execute in an order and I have set the order in the sequence. However when I save, close and open the sequence again, it randomly changes the order.
Has anyone seen this issue before?
Regards,
AmolHi,
Well firstly the version 9.3.0.1 isn't a very stable one. So if you are working on 9.3.1 or above then I don't think it should affect you. Also what I noticed was that as long as the total number of business rules in the sequence were less than 10 then it wouldn't cause the issue.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Amol -
while importing business rule from QA to PROD using LCM we are facing issues..It doesn't import Business rule . we had to do it manually copy and paste the code and variables. then stop and start the services to make this rule effective..we are on 11.1.2.0 version
please advice and anyone else is also facing same issue
thanksHi,
I did'nt faced any issues wile exporting using the LCM. This is actualy the best methods of exporting and importing the BRs form different environments.
You can also try exporting na dimporting the BRs from EAS console.
I dont you how you are doing it, it is hjust about selecting the artifacts take an export and import from the file system.
It is ok to copy paste if you have a few rules to export, but if you have many, then try to use one of the approach that the product provides.
Thanks,
Sourabh
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have created several PDF forms using Adobe Designer 7.0 for Windows XP and I want to compile them into a single PDF document using Adobe Acrobat Professional 7.0's "Create PDF from multiple files" option. But when I try, I get a message that "The f
-
System.DirectoryServices.Protocols.SearchRequest Ldap Query Execution Problem
Hi, I am using DirectorySearcher class to query the active directory. It gives all the records in a single page (more than 5000). I want to get 100 records per page. So I moved to SearchRequest class. Using SearchRequest class I can get 100 reco
-
PO not allowed beyond the target value of contract.
Hi Forum, I have a Contract, when I create a PO with ref to the Contract, it should not allow the PO to be created beyond the target value of the Contract. Where should I make the configuration settings for this. Whenever the PO created beyond the ta
-
Need to pull the data from one server to another server in SSMS using linked server
Hi, I have store proc which will take the parameters passed to it and store it in a table in that server. Now, this table data has to be pulled to another server table which is of same structure. But I need to do that in the same store proc which is
-
Co-Product and By-Product Costing in SAP PP Scenario
Frds, Somebody can tell me, settings/enhancement in PP for Co-Product and By-product Costing along with Header Material? Thanx