CST and VAT calculation is wrong for Tool amortisation PO

Hi,
We have tool amortization process in out company.
Vendor develops tool for us and same will be amortized for each part paying addionally some amount other than material cost ( Condition type ZAMT).
Excise duties to be calculated for tool cost also. But not VAT or CST.
Now issue is tool amortization cost is calculated for excise duties ( Base price and ZAMT price ) which is correct.
When we calculate the CST/VAT it considers tool amortization cost also for basic price due to this we need to pay additional VAT or CST .
Is there any provision can be made in MM pricing procedure for ZAMT or in TAXINN for VAT/CST to exclude tool amortization cost.
Please reply
Guru

Have your pricing procedure as follows:-
100::::PR00::::::Base Price
110::::ZAMT:::::Tool Cost:::::::::::::100
120:::::::::::::::Total for ED:::::::::::100::::110
130::::ZVAT:::::VAT on Base Price::::100
140::::ZCST:::::CST on Base Price::::100
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

CST and VAT amount (non deductible) is debiting in the purchase price

Hi
          1)     We are maintaining standard price as price index
          2)     Pricing procedure as TAXINJ
          3)     While GR the CST and VAT amount (non deductible) is debiting in the purchase price
                 variance, and credit in the GR/IR
          4)     Which has to debit in the raw material account
          5)     Is there is any notes for the this
          6)     or any other solution plz send your reply

HI..
it is not done in OBq3
See in OBQ3..you define Pricing procedure.against pricing Procudure you will give the account Key against the condition type in the Pricing Procedure.
For this Account Key ..you Define it as Detuctable or not in OBCN.
so it determines whether to add to raw material account or not..
but see in early post which is also valid even if you have define the sdame in OBCN.
Hope so it helps
Regards
Anjanna

How to populate the CST and VAT registration no in billing.

Hello Gurus ,
Goodevening ,
How to populate VAT NO and CST NO of Customer and Company in the invoice of the customer.
Looking for your inputs
Regards
Ravi.M

Hi,
Go to J1ID, select "Excise Indicator for Plant" and maintain the CST and VAT numbers of that plant.
Table - J_1IMOCOMP
Field names are
CST No - J_1ICSTNO
VAT No.- J_1ILSTNO
PAN No. - J_1IPANNO
Rgds
Raj

CST and vat in purchase return

Respected all
Plz see the below threads, and requesting you to plz help me , how can i apply CST and vat in purchase return ? Frequently we have received some goods from vendor, he is applied us VAT 4% and another vendor applying cst 4%..
so when ever i am doing Purchase return (122 Mvt ) and JIS, there uis no option to mention CST or VAT..
plz help..
sumit

Hi,
In J1IS, it is only for Excise Duties like BED, CESS and HCESS.
VAT Comes to play at the time of MIRO when u will raise Credit memo to vendor.
so at the Time of MIRO, system will calculate VAT for Credit memo.
CST is always non-deducatble, so it comes to play at the time of GR.
and for Return Excise Invoice, if u wants VAT or CST ...then ask the ABAPER to put condition like JVRD and JIPC in smart form
Regards,
Pardeep malik

CST and VAT amount (non deductible taxe) is debiting in the purchase price

Hi
I am facing some problem in migo FI documents
MY client is maintaining standard price for raw materials
While doing GR in MIGO CST and VAT ,both are non deductible taxes, is debiting in purchase price variance and crediting in GR/IR
The above said taxes are not debiting in raw material account now
I had already done all the settings in OBCN like tick mark, posting indicator and 3 Distribute to relevant expense/revenue items etc.,
but still the taxes are debiting in variance account. We are maintaining pricing procedure as TAXINJ
plz give your suggestions how to solve the problem.

Hi
If you have maintained a Standard proce control in the material master, the non deductible taxes will not post into the material account, you need to maintain a moving average price control for the material to get the non deductible taxes posted.
Price variance account is trigerred due the reason as sytem is trying to post it on to the material and you maintained it as standard price, so sytem cannot add to the material, so it posts the amount in PP account.
Change price control from S to V, you r issue will be solved
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Cst and vat

Hi All,
in my sales order both cst (jin1) and vat (jin2) are flowing.
Pls help.
regards
SG

Hi,
Check the condition Record for CST and VAT.
Region of the delivering plant(OX10)/ Region of the Ship To Party(XD02) / Tax Classification-Customer(XD02) / Tax Classification -Material(MM02)
CST will be appliciale for Sales between two States.
VAT will ve appliciable for Sales within the State.
Now for CST, Plant region and ShiptoParty Region will be different.
for VAT , Plant region and ShiptoParty Region will be same.
I think in condition record you maintained same for both CST and VAT.
with regards
Azeez.Mohd

Function Module for Excise and VAT Calculation

Dear All,
I required one Function module for calculation of Excise % and amount of Invoice Verification Document.
We are use TAXINN tax procedure. I am try to make Purchases Register where we required the Break up of Full tax amount as basic excise duty, Education Cess, S&H Education Cess and VAT Amount.
Thanks
Mukesh

Hi,
Locks are usually appliend on Tables. So you could find the table names affecting.
Then you could goto SE11 and n Lock objects search for table name
Once you identify the lock object. Display. Goto->Lock Modules.
You will get 2 module names one for enqueue and 1 for dequeue.
e.g. Lock object EBKK_ACCNT.
and FMs are DEQUEUE_EBKK_ACCNT and ENQUEUE_EBKK_ACCNT
Hope this helps.
Regards
Megha

CST and VAT added to material at the time of migo and miro

Hi,
we are maintaining FV11 record in that case amount is displaying but condition value is showing "0"
Thanks a lot in advance for your confirmation,
Neelima
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Sep 7, 2011 10:03 AM

Hi,
VAT can be inventoried or can be used for Set-Off based on how material behave to the business. VAT can be inventoried, you should have a condition type with assigning of NVV key in tax procedure .VAT can be used for Set-Off , you should have another condition type and assigning to an accounting key ( For example: ZZV {new on}not to the NVV key certainly) in tax procedure in OBYZ t.code & in t.code: OB40 , ZZV should assign to G/L account for VAT Set-Off.
For VAT - inventoried & VAT -Set-Off, you should maintain records(FV11)with respective condition type for VAT - inventoried & VAT -Set-Off with individual tax code with tax rate.
For VAT can be inventoried, it will affect on accounting in MIGO transaction adding VAT amount to Inventory Account.
For Set-Off VAT, it will affect in MIRO transaction.
Generally CST always inventoried by business, it will affect on accounting in MIGO transaction adding CST amount to Inventory Account and you have to have a condition type for CST with assigning of NVV key in tax procedure, tax code for CST and maintain record (FV11) with CST condition type with CST tax code with a tax rate.
Regards,
Biju K

VAT calculation is wrong!!

Hi,
Its concerned to Indian Excise.
Scenario:
1)Tax code contains only 4% VAT & other excise duty is added manually in PO conditions.
2)In PO, VAT Calculation is correct
3)During invoice verifiavtion with ref to PO,Assessable values are flowing to MIRO for all line items of PO.
Error: when appropriate tax code is selected (Only 4% VAT) for each line item in MIRO,VAT value which is being calculated is not exactly equals to 4% instead its diiferent for each line items like 4.19%,4.74%,4.09% and 4.37%.
Can you pls advise,what is reason for this small difference in VAT calculation.
Regds

Hi,
I checked in detail,other things are correct.
But one more point is,infact there are 2 POs & 1 Invoice related to above issue.If I try to do MIRO for both POs together this Difference in VAT amount is reflecting as said before,If individual PO is considered for Invoice verification there is no such difference in VAT amount i can post the document.
Regds

VAT calculation going wrong in dealer invoice

Hi All,
I am doing a dealer purchase scenario where in am giving basic price inclusive of excise in the PO and then while capturing excise invoice am changing the base value and excise duties manually in MIGO by checking MRP indicator such that sum of excise base value and excise duty is equal to PO price and similarly am changing base while doing MIRO but am still not getting the VAT correct.
for example
PO price excluding VAT - 102,490.00
VAT - 4,099.60 + 1,024.90
Excise duties = 6,394.00 + 128.00 + 64.00
In MIGO i have changed base value as 95,904.00 and captured and posted the above excise duties. In MIRO i have changed base value as 95,904.00 and selected the tax code with excise 10.3 and VAT 4+1. Excise duties are coming as in excise invoice but VAT is being calculated based on PO price + (excise duty based on the base value in Excise Invoice i.e., )
Plz suggest
Edited by: SAp321436 on Jan 12, 2011 6:16 AM

hi
what are the exicse % you have maintained in TAX CODE
it should be zero
like excise =0
cess=0
secess=0
and vat =4
vat1 =1
ASSIGN ACCOUNTS for all conditions including excise
now check
regards
kunal
now use this code

Reg. Tax and VAT calculation in a PO.

Dear Experts
We want to maintain both tax and vat for a po, if we use both the VAT didn't calculated in PO,manual excise and other cess are calculated. Pls help me how to maintain both in a PO.
Thanks
Rajakumar.K

Hi,
1- Pls check in FV12 combination for tax and vat condition types.. is it maintained on same logic i,e tax code or mat./plant/vendor... should have same combination..
2- check the both condition types date have correct validation date.
3- maintain the tax and vat condition types rates in ME11or MEK1

CST or VAT needs to be determined based on Ship-to-party

Dear All,
We have a specific requirement for one of our customer.
Customer wants the system to determine CST and VAT to be determined based on ship to party.
Say for Example, we have a condition table Country / Region / Region of Delivering plant / Tax class. Cust. / Tax Class. Mat.
In the sales Ship to party and Sold to party are different.
In this case, if the tax classification of the Sold to party 0 and tax classification of Ship to party is 1 means, system should determine CST or VAT according to According to ship to party.
In simple, CST or VAT should be determined based on Ship to party irrespective of the setting in Sold to party.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Mullairaja

Hello Mullairaja,
See Ship to Party is the partner who will receie the goods & applicability of VAT or CST will be decided by Ship to party Region.
As Sold to party & Ship to party can belong to different Regions (Different States in India) VAT or CST may be applicable as the case may be...
Thus this is a standard SAP funtion to determine VST / CST based on Region & Tax Classification Indicator of Ship-to-party.
Hope this helps..
Thanks,
Jignesh Mehta

Tables for VAT or CST and RATE OF TAX for a PURCHASE ORDER

i am developing a report(abap ALV)
i need to display the VAT or CST and RATE OF TAX for a PURCHASE ORDER that has been posted .
which tables to refer?

hi kumar gaurav
Check KONV table..
based on Condition TYpe you can get...
Regards
Deva

On one of my computers, the tool bar includes an icon for radio stations and a calculator, but those do not appear on my other computer. Are these add-ons? How do I add them to my other computer?

When I downloaded Firefox 4 on my desktop, it included an icon for radio stations, for the weather and a calculator. I don't remember choosing them. I also downloaded Firefox 4 on my netbook, but these same icons are visible. Can I add them?

These may well be add-ons, look at what you have installed
* use '''Firefox button'''(orange tab top left) ''' -> Add-ons | Plugins/Extensions''' that is the add-ons manager, and also allows you to search for other addons
* see also [[customizing firefox with add-ons]]
Some of the icons could also be bookmarks, note the bookmark toolbar does not display in Firefox 4 by default to get it back
* use '''Firefox Button -> Options -> [x] Bookmarks Toolbar''' that is assuming you have bookmarks in the bookmarks toolbar folder (should have some defaults like 'most visited')
Some add-ons may not be compatible with Firefox 4, but revisions may be issued that work, or alternatives with similar functions may be available.

Absence Deduction is calculated wrong for one employee

Hi, We have an employee who changed his absence booking for the year and all of sudden his absence deduction is not calculating properly. His total absence quota was 20 days. He initially booked all 20 days and then cancelled them and created a new booking for 9.5 days but his deduction is saying 16.5 days.
Is there a way I can check his records why it's only happening to him. Also I am new to this so not sure where to start investigating. I did check the deduction rule and it's ok - calculates correctly for other employees, only this particular employee is calculating wrong.

Hi Joe,
I did replicate it for another employee belonging to the same group and it calculated correctly. And the 9.5 days already excludes holidays and weekends. Not sure what else to check at this point. Although the only difference in the records of the 2employees is that the problematic employee has a negative carryover from previous year. not sure exactly what that means.

CST and VAT calculation is wrong for Tool amortisation PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for