Cumulative SUM based on Measure FROM LOWER to HIGHER

Hello,
I tried to find some post like mine but i did not find it.
I have this scenario:
Filter
Cod Store
Value
Cenario 1
City: RJ
1112
574924.05
Type: Infantil
1449
617860.04
Store: Carrefour
1023
873678.53
But i need to create a new calculated member based on VALUE from LOWER to HIGH making a cumulative sum like this:
Filter
Cod Store
Value
What i NEED
Cenario 1
City: RJ
1112
574924.05
574924.05
Type: Infantil
1449
617860.04
1192784.09
Store: Carrefour
1023
873678.53
2066462.62
Here it is ordered by VALUE already, but in my cube is may not be. Can someone help me? i trying many ways but no one works fine.
Fabrizzio A. Caputo Certificações: MCT MCC Oracle OCA 11g MCITP SQL Server 2008 BI MCITP SQL Server 2008 Implementation and Maintenance MCITP SQL Server
2008 Developer ITIL V3 Foundation Blog Pessoal: <a href="http://fabrizziocaputo.wordpress.com">www.fabrizziocaputo.wordpress.com</a> Email: [email protected]

Hi Fabrizzio,
Most of the running total snippets you will find in the forums contains elements like currentmember, prevmember or ranges [A : B] that also refers to members. Unfortunately the relative position of those elements are extracted from the hierarchy
level of the correspondent members as defined in the cube dimensions and not from the ordered (query scope) set.
The usual solution is to define a measure as the rank in the ordered set and take the cumulative sum with head (): sum( head( ordered set, till the rank) , by the value measure ).
If you choose the recursive solution for the running total you could use item() in combination with rank: maybe something like orderedset.item(rank measure) as an ersatz of currentmember.
Philip,

Similar Messages

Mdx : Sum up the measure from start but need only non empty rows

Hi All
i have created a calculated measure where it suming up all its previous avaialable values based on Date dimension.
Everything is working but we are getting all rows from that datetimension . how can get only till current date,
SUM(NULL:[Date].[Hierarchy].currentmember,[Measures].[SIMID])
Surendra Thota

Hi Surendra,
According to your description, you want to calculate the sum up the measure from start for those non empty rows, right?
In this case, please try the query below.
WITH MEMBER [Measures].[Sum from start]
AS
SUM ({NULL:[Date].[Calendar].CurrentMember},
[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount])
SELECT {[Measures].[Internet Sales Amount],[Measures].[Sum from start]} ON 0 ,
nonempty([Date].[Calendar].[Calendar Year].MEMBERS) ON 1
FROM [Adventure Works]
Result
Besides, here is a blog which describe various way to calculate running total, please see:
http://blog.sqltechie.com/2011/01/various-way-to-calculate-running-total.html
Regards,
Charlie Liao
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Charlie Liao
TechNet Community Support

Velocity measurement from low resolution encoders

Hi, I have 1024 pulse/1rotation encoders. I want to calculate or estimate angular velocity from this low resolution encoders. When I use dx/dt(derivative.vi) there are high and low readings which obviously seem wrong to me.I want to have a more smooth and accurate reading(and without much delay). Is there an efficient and accurate way of reading velocity measurements from this low resolution encoders? FOr example does Ni/Motion help? Or is there a velocity measurement .vi ?
Thank you.

As far as I remember (*) , the FP-QUAD will measure the velocity by counts during a fixed time slot. The maximum time is (was?) 26.??ms.
Your resolver has 1024 pulses (I assume 2 pulse streams with 90° shift) , the QUAD will count pulse edges, so you get 4096 counts per revolution. Together with the integration time (26.??ms), you get a resolution of 38.15 counts/s (See manual of the FP-QUAD) or an error of +/- 0.559 RPM
Of course you can read the 32bit counter of the QUAD in a user defined time periode and calculate the velocity.
If you have real slow movements, you can measure the time between each pulse. The accuracy will depend on the quality of your resolver and the resolution of your timer, however I think this couldn't be done with the FP-QUAD.
* My last task with FP-QUAD was 4 years ago, maybe new firmware and driver give you more choices now
Greetings from Germany
Henrik
LV since v3.1
“ground” is a convenient fantasy
'˙˙˙˙uıɐƃɐ lɐıp puɐ °06 ǝuoɥd ɹnoʎ uɹnʇ ǝsɐǝld 'ʎɹɐuıƃɐɯı sı pǝlɐıp ǝʌɐɥ noʎ ɹǝqɯnu ǝɥʇ'

Organizing data from low to high?

Hi Community,
I'm totally out of numbers and such, but I need to organize some data from low values to high values automatically, like for example, the earnings in 12 months, which are always variables but I would like to organize them from the lower to the higher. Is there a way to organize this automatically?
Thanks in advance,
Mart

Mart,
Would sorting your rows by column content do it for you?
Jerry

Rollup of Scores: From lower to higher context

Hi Everyone,
Would it be possible that for each scores on the balance scorecard be rolled up according to the hierarchy of the context? So that on the top most hierarchy of the Context we will have an overview across context which perspective is behind...
Thank you in advance.
Rally

Rally,
With multi-dimensional modeling you can build a dimension based on your contexts and use that when dimensioning data. While in BW a key figure is neccessarily dimensioned by every characteristic in the dimension tables, in PAS, every measure can be dimensioned differently. For example, Sales can be dimensioned by Customer, Customer Group, and Product, while Costs can be dimensioned by just Customer Group and Product. So you have the flexibility of just choosing those measures (or key figures) you would like also dimensioned by Context.
Regards,
Bob

Rman backup from lower and higher versions

Hi all,
we have three database one db in 8.1.0.6.0 and another 9.2.0.8.0 and another 10.2 database. Can i backup using 9i rman to lower version 8i and 10G using same catalog created in 9i ?

Please check about compatible
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/backup.102/b14194/compat002.htm

Why does my macbook pro LED backlight keep going from low to high on it's own?

So this has happened to me I think once or twice before.. I'll be using my macbook and all of a sudden it's LED backlight goes dim. Then I have to change it back so it's in the middle (not too dim, not too bright). Then a couple minutes/seconds later the LED backlight goes to it's brightest.. It's making me mad that it's doing this and I don't know why it's doing what it does. All of this is happening while I'm scrolling down a webpage, typing, or just physically doing something on the keyboards. So it's not because it's about to go to sleep. I always keep the LED backlighting in the middle so it doesn't waste too much battery. So why is it doing this? Help me please?

There is an ambient light sensor built in the the MBP. If it is annoying , open SYSTEM PREFERENCES>DISPLAYS>DISPLAY. Uncheck the box for 'Automatically adjust brightness as ambient light changes'.
Ciao.

Change photo from low to high resolution

Can Photoshop take a 72 dpi photo and turn it into a 300 dpi phot?

Yes, but depends on your expectations? DPI is just dots per inch for a printer command. It does nothing to the base resolution. One can not manufactor more resolution that it was shot at.

Sum based on Number values in a Char string..

i have a requirement
i have a field on my form, designed in form6i (oracle 10g)
my tables are;
with t1 as (
            select 101 t1_code,'it101' t1_itcode, 10 t1_qty, 5.5 t1_prc from dual union all
            select 101,'it102', 5 , 3 from dual union all
            select 102,'it102', 10 , 3 from dual union all
            select 102,'it104', 10 , 5 from dual union all
            select 103,'it101', 10 , 5.5 from dual)
select * from t1;
with t2h as (
            select 11 t2h_no, 101 t2h_code from dual union all
            select 12 , 101 from dual union all
            select 13 , 102 from dual union all
            select 14 , 103 from dual )
select * from t2h;
with t2d as (
            select 11 t2d_no, 'it101' t2d_itcode, 5 t2d_qty from dual union all
            select 11 , 'it102', 5 from dual union all
            select 12 , 'it101', 5 from dual union all
            select 13 , 'it102', 5 from dual union all
            select 13 , 'it104', 5 from dual union all
            select 13 , 'it102', 5 from dual union all
            select 13 , 'it104', 5 from dual union all
            select 14 , 'it101', 10 from dual)
select * from t2d;t1_CODE , t2h_no and t2d_no are fields Number datatype.
var m_x varchar2(20);
exec :m_x :='11,12';
lets say the value of m_x (t2d_no) is 11,12
i want the query to sum t2d_qty for t2d_no 11 & 12 and put 1 t1_prc in the resultant row
based on the matching t1_itcode with t2d_itcode
the result should be like this for m_x = 11,12
T1_IT        T1_QTY        T1_PRC
it101        15.000         5.500
it102         5.000         3.000
if m_x hold just 11 then it should return just;
T1_IT        T1_QTY        T1_PRC
it101         5.000         5.500
it102         5.000         3.000if m_x hold just 11,13 then it should return an error msg
as the t2h_code is not the same for t2d_no 11 & 13;
kindly suggest..
TY

I tried to solve the puzzle. But I'm already confused on the requirement. On what fields do you want to join and what fields to sum....??
I did this, but then I got lost.... maybe you can use it as a start to define "join" and "sum" ... conditions.
with t1 as (
            select 101 t1_code,'it101' t1_itcode, 10 t1_qty, 5.5 t1_prc from dual union all
            select 101,'it102', 5 , 3 from dual union all
            select 102,'it102', 10 , 3 from dual union all
            select 102,'it104', 10 , 5 from dual union all
            select 103,'it101', 10 , 5.5 from dual),
t2h as (
            select 11 t2h_no, 101 t2h_code from dual union all
            select 12 , 101 from dual union all
            select 13 , 102 from dual union all
            select 14 , 103 from dual ),
t2d as (
            select 11 t2d_no, 'it101' t2d_itcode, 5 t2d_qty from dual union all
            select 11 , 'it102', 5 from dual union all
            select 12 , 'it101', 5 from dual union all
            select 13 , 'it102', 5 from dual union all
            select 13 , 'it104', 5 from dual union all
            select 13 , 'it102', 5 from dual union all
            select 13 , 'it104', 5 from dual union all
            select 14 , 'it101', 10 from dual)
select t1.t1_itcode,sum(a.t2d_qty)t2d_qty ,sum(t1.t1_prc)t1_prc
FROM
(select t2d.t2d_no,sum(t2d.t2d_qty) t2d_qty
from t2d
inner join t2h
on (t2d.t2d_no=t2h.t2h_no)
where t2d.t2d_no in (11,12)
group by t2d.t2d_no
) a
inner join t1
on (t1.t1_qty = a.t2d_qty )
group by t1.t1_itcode, t1.t1_prc;

How to find the cumulative Sum

How to get the fastest result in 180 million records table to get the BTN(BillingTelephoneNbr) wise MonthlySalesCost.
select B.BTN,b.cost,sum(a.cost) as cum_sal
from Monthly_BTN a,Monthly_BTN b
where a.rowid <= b.rowid
group by b.rowid,b.BTN,b.cost.
Above query is taking up the too much time.
Option:-
a) partition the table
b) rebuild the index
c) alter the index
d) any other suggestion??
Let me know the best way.

I don't understand why you need a self-join.
See the following example, with cumulative sum about deptno :
SCOTT@demo102> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 select empno, deptno, sal, sum(sal) over (partition by deptno order by empno)
2 from emp
3* order by deptno , empno
SCOTT@demo102> /
 EMPNO DEPTNO SAL SUM(SAL)OVER(PARTITIONBYDEPTNOORDERBYEMPNO)
 7782 10 24500 24500
 7839 10 50000 74500
 7934 10 13000 87500
 7369 20 8000 8000
 7566 20 29750 37750
 7788 20 30000 67750
 7876 20 11000 78750
 7902 20 30000 108750
 7499 30 16000 16000
 7521 30 12500 28500
 7654 30 12500 41000
 7698 30 28500 69500
 7844 30 15000 84500
 7900 30 9500 94000
14 rows selected.
SCOTT@demo102> So, your query would be :
select BTN,cost,sum(cost) over (partition by BTN order by BTN,cost) as ***_sal
from Monthly_BTN
order by BTN,cost;Anyway, a query without where clause on a huge table (180 million records) seems to me like a little strange, are you sure that you will read all rows ?
Nicolas.
partition or not partition about BTN... like you want.
Message was edited by:
N. Gasparotto

Measures from dimension table

Hi,
Here is part of my logical layer (BMM):
Dim - Time: TIME_KEY, ...
Dim - Client: CLIENT_KEY, ...
Fact - Encounters: # Visits ( i.e., count(distinct(EVENT_ID) )
The above fact table contains foreign keys (TIME_KEY, CLIENT_KEY, etc.) to all dimension tables in the physical layer.
My requirements:
I need to generate a pivot report that has the following information:
Rows: Translated categories based on # Visits (from Fact - Encounters)
Columns: Fiscal Year (from Dim - Time)
Measures: # distinct Clients (from Dim - Client)
Somehow I could only get the correct measures when I used aggregation rule=count distinct for the CLIENT_KEY column in the "Dim - Client" table in the "presentation layer". However, I know this is not the right way to do that because all measures should be calculated based on the "fact" tables. Then, I even tried to create a logical fact table based on the same source as the "Dim - Client" table but got all zeros in the measures. Does anyone know the correct way to implement this logical layer?
Thanks.
Andy

Can anyone help?
Thanks.
Andy

How do I get Illustrator to measure from centerline?

Would like to input measurements in transform palette of a rectangle, and have that rectangle be placed with out concern for stroke width. Just to be measured from centerline of stroke/path, ala FreeHand. Is there a pref for "measure from center" or similar that I am missing.

Hi there...
If I type in the transform palette, X:0 Y:0 W:1in H:1in for a shape, it will give me a square based on the width of the shape including the stroke. In my mind that is not a one inch square because if I change the stroke it is no longer 1" square. I would like to base the measurements on the centerline of the path.

Maintenance Orders based in measurement documents

Hi SAP Gurus,
I need to plan PM Orders based on measurement documents.
Imagine that I have a device to record temperature. The normal tempure is 25ºC. What I wan't is to open Maintence Orders when the temperute changes to 26ºC or 24ºC.
Now, in order to do this I cannot make a counter, only a measurement document, because I want to keep a record from temperetures.
But the problem is that if I record this as a measurement document, and not as a counter, I cannot make Single Cycle Plans....
Can you help me?
Thanks in advance.

Hi
IMRC0001 - this user exit will help u to create a notification.. once the measurement docs are apdated...
Normally.. it was useful for counter based measurement... since.. once the running hours are entered a notification is created and corresponding u can create a order...check out.. if it can be used to measurement point...i hope it should be used...
I am not sure abt that
- Pithan

Hi, I can't found on where the price different receipt from lower level come from. Please help.. Thanks a lot in advance..

CKM3
Category
Quantity
Unit
PrelimVal
Price Diff
ExRt Diff
Price
Currency
Beginning Inventory
419
KG
18,841.59
4,798.81
-0.09
56,420.79
MYR
Period Opening
419
KG
18,841.59
0.00
0
44,968.00
MYR
2000050719 Post closing material ledger
0
KG
0.00
4,798.81
-0.09
0.00
MYR
Receipts
1,225.00
KG
55,085.80
27,733.41
-0.03
67,607.49
MYR
Production
1,225.00
KG
55,085.80
27,733.41
-0.03
67,607.49
MYR
5000125874 Receipts from Lower Levels
0
KG
0.00
26,620.23
-0.03
0
MYR
1002200029 Order Settlement 1183964
0
KG
0.00
1,113.18
0
0.00
MYR
1002183596 GR for order 1183964/1
1,225.00
KG
55,085.80
0.00
0.00
44,968.00
MYR
Cumulative Inventory
1,644.00
KG
73,927.39
32,532.22
-0.12
64,756.38
MYR
Consumption
225
KG
10,117.80
4,452.40
-0.02
64,756.36
MYR
Not Allocated
0
KG
0.00
4,452.40
-0.02
0.00
MYR
Consumption
225
KG
10,117.80
0.00
0
44,968.00
MYR
1002191063 GD goods issue:delvy 601
200
KG
8,993.60
0.00
0.00
44,968.00
MYR
1002183646 GD goods issue:delvy 601
25
KG
1,124.20
0.00
0.00
44,968.00
MYR
Ending Inventory
1,419.00
KG
63,809.59
28,079.82
-0.10
64,756.38
MYR
5000125874 Multilevel Price Determination
0
KG
0.00
26,715.16
-0.10
0.00
MYR
4000046771 Single-Level Price Determinati
0
KG
0.00
1,364.66
0.00
0.00
MYR

Hi
Please, address your question to SCN PP Space http://scn.sap.com/community/erp/manufacturing-pp/content
Br, Alex

How to find the Sum based on Like Dates

Hello everyone,
Column 1 contains "Date Sent", Column 2 contains "Dates of Service" and Column 3 contains the payment "Amount" in USD. I want to write a formula that will total up the sum of payment values from column 3 based on the date of payment (Column 1).
Thanks!
Jared

Hi Jared,
This will do what's illustrated in your example, but has a few restrictions:
The dates must run in ascending order.
To get a total for the last date, a later date (with no corresponding amount) must be entered after the last transaction.
Formula:
Entered in D2, and filled down the rest of column D:
=IFERROR(IF(A3>A2,SUMIF($A,A2,C),""),"")
IFERROR is used to suppress the error message that arises from the formula in D10 referencing a cell in D11.
Regards,
Barry

Cumulative SUM based on Measure FROM LOWER to HIGHER

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for