Currency conversion - Line item total does not tally with account balance

hi guys!
we are currently going through currency conversion in Zimbabwe and we are at preparation stage. i have got 3 issues:
1. while trying to run program RFSEPA02 the following error is appearing-
   -Line item total does not tally with account balance
2. i might need to retrieve some FI documents whic were archived. how do i retrieve archived documents
3. i might also be required to delete(if its an option) some records so tha line item total will tally with account balance

put a break-point @
if t_balance_items_hw[] <> t_balance_account_hw[] or
     t_balance_items_tw[] <> t_balance_account_tw[].
    perform dequeue_account.
    message e099.
*   Summe der Einzelposten stimmt nicht mit Kontensaldo überein. ->
  endif.
endform.                               " CHECK_ACCOUNT_BALANCE_2
and debug y it is getting the error.
Short text
Switch On Open Item Management by Changing Master Record
Description
This program activates open item (OI) management for a G/L account and makes the necessary changes to documents already posted. These are then displayed afterwards as open items. It does not process the open items any further. In reversed documents especially, it does not reenter clearing data in the document.
Requirements
No items can already be archived from this account.
Caution: Company policy must be in place to ensure that this does not happen.
Some G/L accounts cannot be managed on an open item basis, especially G/L accounts that are used in account determination for automatic transactions (for example, accounts set up for transactions MVA or VVA, or accounts which are posted to using posting keys set up for account type M).
Caution: Before making any changes, check that the G/L account can really be managed on an open item basis. If necessary, contact your SAP consultant.
The account must be blocked from posting since any new documents posted at the same time as converting documents and postings for this account would not be entered.
Output
When using the list log, each document that was changed is listed. In addition, the total of the changed BSIS/BSAS entries and the total of the changed documents is listed.
Regards
Prabhu
Message was edited by: Prabhu Peram

Similar Messages

  • AR01 REPORT IS NOT TALLYING WITH GL BALANCE

    Dear SAP Guru's
    AR01 report is not tallying with CWIP gl. during our observation, we found that out of four CWIP assets two of them showing over balance and two of them showing under balance. but when i tried for settling these assets to actual assets, system shows no value for settlement. But when i try for Scrapping, system is allowing for scrapping from these CWIP assets. In General, when ever value is lying in the CWIP, system will allow for settlement, but why in these case it is not allowing. What could be the reason ..for .CWIP assets shows Under/Over value. 
    Please advice.
    regds

    Dear Ravi..
    Thanks for your early reply...
    01. As per the Program documentation, it shows that these report should be executed only before year end closing.
          Is there any effect if i execute now.
    02. For Your information, i know the exact difference of balance which both AR01 and CWIP GL shows, so to what extent this program ABST2)will help.
    03.It would be helpful to me  if you have any solution to resolve it.
    04. Actually this problem was existing from more than 3 fiscal years...our auditors did not recognize it..now management recognised and want to rectify. If i reverse any entries it will effect previous Statutory reports, so without effecting the previous statements i have resolve it.
    Regds,

  • Line item data does not appear on all master pages - Adobe forms

    Hi Guys,
    I have a problem in Adobe forms as explained below-
    I have a page in the form which has, you can say, a 2 windows or subforms (  Information window/subfirm on top right corner, main on middle of the page ). The data of the main subform is a line item data of delivery. Some parts of the same data need to be printed on the Information subform also. The main subform can overflow  to next pages but the information window will have only very limited data to be printed on one page itself, meaning it does not overflow.
    Now the requirement is that  each line item should be printed on a new page. For example if there are 2 lines items then first line item should be printed on first page. Then there will be a conditional page break and the next line item will be printed on the next page ( I have achieved this using condition page break). The information window will contain information related to corresponding line items. If the first line item data overflows in main then information window of first line item should be printed on first and 2nd page. The second line item should start printing on 3rd page and information window of  3rd page will contain data of 2nd line item.
    I created 1 body page and 1 master page. I created one internal table with data of main window and information window. I put the information window on master page to make it appear on all the pages. 
    This solution unfortunately does not work. The issue is that in case of overflow, 1st page information window shows first line item. 2nd pages shows 2nd line item and 3rd page is blank whereas ideally 1st and 2nd page information window should show first line item and 3rd page should show 2nd line item. This means that master page and body page are not getting linked. If I create the information window on body page itself, it does not repeat on all the pages. Please provide some inputs to resolve the issue.
    Thanks
    Abhi

    Hi Abhinav,
        I am also trying to solve the similar issue. Need to print the internal table data in the Master page.
      Have you resolved this issue. Can you Please share your solution .
    Thanks
    Swarna.

  • XVBAP has the new line item but does not update Sales Order

    Hi
    I need to update the sales order with a new line item when the line item has a base unit of measure as the sales unit. I need to then convert the base unit to sales unit with a whole figure and the rest can be in the base unit.
    I am able to see the update in the xvbap but the line item doesn't get updated.
    I am puting this code in a perform within
    MV45AFZB  within   Form  USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAP
    But I guess I am doing something wrong can someone please take a look at it and tell me what is wrong with the coding.
    *&  Include       ZSD_CREATE_NEW_LINE_ITEM              *
    *&      Form  create_new_line_item
          text
    -->  p1        text
    <--  p2        text
    FORM CREATE_NEW_LINE_ITEM .
      CONSTANTS: C_MEINH LIKE MARM-MEINH VALUE 'CSE'.
    Variables Used
      DATA: WS_WMENG LIKE VBEP-WMENG.
      DATA: INPUT  LIKE VBAP-KWMENG,
            WS_EA  LIKE VBAP-KWMENG,
            WS_CSE LIKE VBAP-KWMENG.
      DATA: WS_MVKE_VRKME LIKE MVKE-VRKME.
    Internal Tables and Structures
      DATA: WS_XVBAP LIKE XVBAP.
    DATA:
    it_vbap  LIKE vbap OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
    it_vbep  LIKE vbep OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE,
    it_xvbap LIKE vbapvb OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
      DATA: BEGIN OF WS_MARM,
              MEINH LIKE MARM-MEINH,
              UMREZ LIKE MARM-UMREZ,
              UMREN LIKE MARM-UMREN,
            END OF WS_MARM.
      CLEAR WS_MVKE_VRKME.
      SELECT SINGLE VRKME INTO WS_MVKE_VRKME
        FROM MVKE
        WHERE MATNR EQ XVBAP-MATNR
        AND   VKORG EQ XVBAK-VKORG
        AND   VTWEG EQ XVBAK-VTWEG.
      IF VBAP-VRKME <> WS_MVKE_VRKME.
       LOOP AT XVBAP.
          SELECT SINGLE MEINH UMREZ UMREN
            FROM MARM
            INTO WS_MARM
            WHERE MATNR = VBAP-MATNR
            AND   MEINH = WS_MVKE_VRKME.
          IF XVBAP-MEINS <> WS_MVKE_VRKME.
            IF NOT XVBAP-KWMENG = 0.
              WS_WMENG = XVBAP-KWMENG / WS_MARM-UMREZ.
              IF WS_WMENG > 1.
    This means that the line item needs to be split into CSE & EA
                  INPUT  = XVBAP-KWMENG.
                  WS_EA  = INPUT / WS_MARM-UMREZ.
                  WS_CSE = WS_EA.
                  WS_EA  = WS_CSE * WS_MARM-UMREZ.
                  WS_EA  = INPUT - WS_EA.
    Now we have the qty. split into EA & CSE. Now to
    assign it to xvbap
                  XVBAP-KWMENG = WS_EA.
                  XVBAP-VRKME  = WS_MVKE_VRKME.
              READ TABLE XVBAP WITH KEY POSNR = XVBAP-POSNR.
                MODIFY XVBAP INDEX SY-TABIX.
                  WS_XVBAP = XVBAP.
                  WS_XVBAP-KWMENG = WS_CSE.
                MOVE-CORRESPONDING WS_XVBAP TO XVBAP.
                INSERT XVBAP INDEX SY-TABIX.
              ENDIF.
            ENDIF.
          ENDIF.
      ENDIF.     " IF xvbap-vrkme 'EA'.
    ENDFORM.    " create_new_line_item

    Hi Clark,
    Pls check the Include MV45AFZZ instead of the one which you are using . Here in this include MV45AFZZ you can have access to the Header and Line items data .
    Here in this include
          FORM USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT                                   *
          This userexit can be used to save data in additional tables   *
          when a document is saved.                                     *
          If field T180-TRTYP contents 'H', the document will be        *
          created, else it will be changed.                             *
          This form is called at from form BELEG_SICHERN, before COMMIT *
    form userexit_save_document.
    Endform.
    Either you can write the code you want to update the XVABP table here or you can use the form .
          FORM USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP                              *
          This userexit can be used to move some fields into the sales  *
          dokument item workaerea VBAP                                  *
          SVBAP-TABIX = 0:  Create item                                 *
          SVBAP-TABIX > 0:  Change item                                 *
          This form is called at the end of form VBAP_FUELLEN.          *
    form userexit_move_field_to_vbap.
    endform.
    This are the 2 performs in this include where you can do you code and it will defnitely solve your problem.
    Good Luck to you . Let me know if your problem get solved.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Naidu.

  • Stock Posting does not tally with Journal Entry

    Hi Mentors,
    I currently trying to see the cause of a particular issue with the JE being created by Stock Posting.
    After scavenging the forums, I came across SAP Note 1525960.
    Symptom
    On creating Inventory Posting in locked Posting Period, system gives error message 'Period is
    locked for new data [Message 131-107]'. Keep the window open, go to Posting Periods to
    change the Period Status to 'Unlocked', and then click on 'Reconcile' again. Inventory Posting
    is successfully added.
    The Transaction Value in the Inventory Audit Report is correct. However the Debit / Credit
    amounts in the Journal Entry of Inventory Posting are doubled.
    The note was created in 2010, filed under SAP Business One 2007. I tried to replicate it, and it holds true for our system, which is currently 2004B.
    When I tried to explain the SAP note to our accountant, she said that she did not encounter the error message, since she was the one controlling the period.
    So my question is, if there any other factors that could influence the change in the posting of the JE such that the variance being posted in the JE is more than the actual amount(as verified against "Inventory Posting List" and OINM)? 
    Some facts about our Finance department's practices.
    They enter the "Stock Posting" a month later.
    E.G. Stock Posting for Oct2011 Stock Variance
    System Date: Nov 16, 2011
    Stock Posting - Posting Date: Oct 31, 2011
    Thanks in advance!
    Sean

    Hi Sir Gordon,
    I already checked using your suggested query:
    SELECT * from oinm
    WHERE NegInvAdjs != 0
    found in this [thread|Re: Diffe Amount posting in Same document].
    Unfortunately, 2004B does not have the column "NegInvAdjs". The query failed to execute.
    Thank you for the guidance,
    Sean

  • Why budget check does not work with account assigment distrib. by quantity?

    Hi Gurus,
    I have an issue in the budget check for Purchase Order (PO).
    I'm using the FM B31I_ACC_PURCHASE_ORDER_CHECK.
    The case is next:
    1 Item with 21 account assignment type AS and distribution by quantity:
    ASSET_NO QUANTITY
    1           1
    2           1
    3           1
    4           1
    5           1
    6           1
    7           1
    8           1
    9           1
    10          1
    11          1
    12          1
    13          1
    14          1
    15          1
    16          1
    17          1
    18          1
    19          1
    20          1
    21          1
    All account assignment are for the same G/L account, fund, functional area...
    The price for each item is $2,499.14, then total price is $52,481.94 (2,499.14 * 21).
    I debugged the FM B31I_ACC_PURCHASE_ORDER_CHECK and found that in FM BBP_PD_COMMITMENT_FILL_BAPI it's making a rounding with percentage:
    The system assume next:
    Each item is 4.76% of total (result of divide 100% / 21 = 4.76190476...) but the percentage is rounded to 2 decimals.
    Then it makes the conversion by the amount corresponding to each item:
    ($52,481.94 * 4.76) / 100 = $2,498.1403
    Finally the budget is checked by $52,460.95 (2498.1403 * 21).
    But available budget is $52,481.90, the check pass, but really there are 4 cents missing (total price is $52,481.94).
    Can somebody say to me if this is a standard behavior?
    It can be fixed with configuration?
    The problem is for multiple account assignment with distribution by quantity and:
    (100 / quantity) = not integer (or have more than 2 decimals)
    For example: with quantity 20 it works because 100% / 20 = 5.00%, then the budget is check exactly.

    1503317 - System Behavior for Account Distribution between SRM and R/3 system
    When using distribution by Value in a SRM document this value is not correct and a rounding occurs once this document is transferred to ERP system.
    Cause
    It is not possible transfer documents to the back end system with distribution by value, due to a back end restriction.
    Resolution
    The following information is the system behavior in R/3 / ERP:
    in R/3, there is accounting distribution only by quantity or percentage. So when distribution by value is used, a rounding will always take place.
    in R/3, the use of value based distribution in SRM will lead to rounding differences.
    Distribution by quantity is allowed in SRM and MM side. However MM do not accept is distribution by value. This is internally converted to distribution percentage based.
    Keywords
    Distribution by Quantity, Distribution by Percentage, Distribution by Value

  • F-03: Amt in doc currency & local currency does not tally

    Hello Friends,
    When doing clearing using F-03 for GL Account 137500 in SGD (document currency), The amount
    does not tally with Amount in local currency (USD) and the selected items
    clearing lines not generated automatically. Why is this happening.
    I found that this is not due to exchange rate
    Please help to resolve.
    Ramu

    There are too many questions..let us take it one at a time
    a. I am using tcode f-03 for clearing GL Account  - OK
    b. When i process the open items and select the items for clearing OK
    c. When posting the difference of the selected items OK
    d. the amount in local currency(USD) does not tally with the amount in document currency (SGD)
    Response:  This will not as the exchange rates are not 1:1  that is One USD will not get you One SGD. The difference will remain.
    e. this is not due to the exchange rate, for example the figure in amount in local currency is 100 USD, the figure in the field amount in document currency is showing as 300 SGD,
    Response:  In all likelihood look at the GL master data `(FS00) and check the values in the `Control Tab`
    f. and also automatic generation of lines (debit & credit) for the sum of selected open items are missing
    Response:*  As in (e) please check if the line item display is checked in the same tab.
    Cheers
    tkvishwa

  • CRM Sales Order Item Status Does Not match R/3 Item Status

    The status of the CRM sales order item is being set to 'In Process' when the related R/3 sales order line item status is set to 'Complete' - when, the delivery quantity is zero for the sales order item.  This happens when the warehouse can't find the stock to pick - the delivery quantity is set to zero.  Thus, the CRM order item status does not agree with the R/3 order item status.  We need for the line item status to be set to 'Complete' in CRM.  Anyone have an idea as to how to make this happen?
    Thanks you.

    Hi Peter and Suresh,
      From the information provided I understand that the sales order created in CRM after replication to R/3 has some status change.
    1.  What are the fields which are updated in R/3 for the sales order created in CRM ?
    2. If sales order fields are updated in R/3 are these updates reflected back to CRM?
    3. If they are reflected back in CRM? Is there still flexibility for sales order to be changed in CRM and replicated back to R/3?
    Can you please share you experiences.. Any help is highly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Jothi

  • Invalid aggregation:( The number received in BW does not tally

    Hi Guru's,
    We are currently facing issue in uploading data in to data traget cube which is showing green symbol in the request status,
    While in monitor it is showing yellow status on the status tab.
    I have checked in the request:
    So I have deleted the request and then reloaded it again.
    I have checked the load which is completed as the number of records are daily.
    But still this status is in yellow so currently I need help to wether, to make the status green manually.
    If so what are the implications.
    Kindly help me in this regards.
    Here is the Error detais:
    Technical:The number received in BW does not tally with the updated number.
    Processing Step:  Update rules
    In step by step:
    Error which is in red: Inadmissable Aggregation?
    Invalid aggregation in the update The number received in BW does not tally with the updated number.
    In details tab:
    Diagnosis
         No errors found. The current process has probably not finished yet.
    System Response
         The ALE inbox of BI is identical to the ALE outbox of the source system
         or
         the maximum wait time for this request has not yet been exceeded
         or
         the background job has not yet finished in the source system.
    Thanks for helping me in this regards in advance.

    Hi,
    I am not sure if the solution is still relevant but we faced a similar problem and we found the solution, so wanted to share with you .
    This error of 'Invalid aggregation' occurs if there are records in error and if the checkbox "No aggregation allowed" is selected in 'Error Handling' under 'Update' tab of Infopackage maintenance.
    Please carry out the followig steps:
    1) Go to the respective infopackage
    2) select tab Processing, make sure radio button  "Only PSA" and the checkbox "update subsequently to data targets" is selected.
    3) On the Update tab, click on the button "Error Handling" at the bottom
    4) Now of the available three radio buttons choose as per your requirement.(select  'valid records update, reporting possible(green)' for master data)
    5) Now, uncheck the box 'No aggregation allowed'
    What the last step does is that, the data is aggregated for the correct records and not for the incorrect records.
    So, in case of an error we will get a separate request for incorrect records, which we can correct and upload later to the respective target.
    This should help resolve the error.
    Regards,
    Roney.

  • Vendor aging unreconciled bal. does not match with TB Acct. Payable balance

    Dear all,
    When i take unreconciled vendor aging report with selection creteria all vendor codes selected,aging date as 31/03/09 and posting date from 01/04/08 to date 31/03/09,Interval - 30 Days,By Journal postings
    Deticked all check boxes in it.
    Aging report total balance of all vendor does not match with account payable balance in Trial balance ?
    But for reconciled aging totals and trial balance total are same.
    How to solve it ? or i need to do any settings ?
    Jeyakanthan

    Hai!
    What version of SAP B1 u r using.
    I do got the same problem for my  customer. I did this..
    1. Run Aging Report for all Vendors. Donot check Recon Transaction.
    2. Export to Excel
    3. Run TB for BP selecting Vendors alone.
    4. Export TB to Excel.
    5. Find vendors who is having mismatch in their balance. (use V-Lookup in Excel)
    6. Run Detail G/L Transaction report for those Vendors one by one.
             *Selection from date: Age from date To date: Age To date *
             *Selection Reconcilled Transaction only
    7. Report Balance should be Zero. If not this problem is because of Internal Reconcillation.
    8. Open *Check and Restore Previous reconcillation * select the vendor, internal
    9. see the reconcillation details.
    10. see the posting dates. All should be in previous fiscal year. (I mean the reconcilled set should have same fiscal year ex: Recon -2 trans should be in same fiscal year)
    11. If, that is corrected and still difference exist means.
    12.Go to Manage Previous Reconcillation
    13. Select BP and Internal (Donot check system reconcill Trans)
    14. Check the Reconcillation wheather all in same fiscal year.
    Regards,
    Thanga Raj.K
    +91 9710445987

  • FS10N balance not tie with FBl3N line item totals

    Hi
    I searched the forum for posting on FS10N and FBL3N incorrect balances and I did not any post appropriate for my issue. Hence I am posting my issue here.
    For a particular month, say 072010, FS10N GL balance does not tie with FBL3N line item totals. I am not sure why. In our case, we did not archive any line items and this is not related to year end carry forward. Year beginning GL balances look fine. We dont have any negative postings. Only few GL balances are off. We are using 4.7 version.
    Do you know why this inconsistency and how to rectify it? Is there any program which I run apart from Yead End carry forward?
    any ideas really appreciated.
    Thanks

    Hello
    We have already this trouble.
    To correct it you need to proceed like this (when NewGL is not activate, with new Gl there is one new programm)
    Without newGL
    - Block account to be posted (transaction FS00 Block for posting in the company view)
    - Delete open item, by using the programm RFSEPA03 (you need to adapt it by a copy because if you don't you can't run it), also this programm will unflag your account in the company view
    - Delete line item by the standrd program RFSEPA04
    - Create the line item by the standard program RFSEPA01
    - if this account is managed by open item, run the programm RFSEPA02 (you need to do the same adjustement of the RFSEPA03)
    With NewGL, there is something new. the program RFSEPA02 is linked with a new transaction and you don't have to adjust it FAGL_ACTIVATE_OP. The difference is when you create the open item, you have to define the default profit center and default value depending of the customizing of the leading ledger.
    BBest regards
    Philippe,
    Thanks for the rewards.

  • KE30 Summary balance not matching with KE24 line item total

    Hello Experts,
    My client's are having one KE30 report and there are about 15-18 rows in the output.  About 12 rows agrees with the KE24 line item report and they inturn matches with FBL3N balance.  However, the balance 3-6 rows does not agree with the KE24 line items report.
    For the difference rows :
    The KE30 balance   USD 210000
    The KE24 balance   USD 229000
    The FBL3N balance USD 229000
    The KEAT figures    USD 229000
    Can anybody confirm which settings are missing, if any.
    Thanks & Regards.
    Vikas.

    Hi
    I think you will have to reconcile on case to case basis and identify the causes...
    It may also happen that some docs are posted with some blank chars and hence they are not featured in KE30 based on the selection parameters given during execution of report
    To mind, only these 2 points come
    1. Define a report restricting to chars like Comp Code, currency type (if applicable), version =0 and period... Do Not restrict on any other char and execute the report.. It has to match with KE24
    2. In the 5 to 6 lines where you have this issue, try to drilldown on each possible char in KE30 for these rows... and match each of this value with KE24... you will come to know where the problem lies
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • FAGLB03 peroid balance not tallying with line items within

    Hi,
    When i go to FAGLB03 and tally  the balance of a recon account for a particular month with the line items in it, it does not tally
    This is happening for one period within the fiscal year, others period balance tally with the line items
    What can be the solution for this?
    Regards,
    Parin

    Hi Parin,
    You did not confirm still whether the account in FAGLF03 is the same account that you  are trying to view.
    This issue will require careful analysis in the system as there could be more than one reasons.One of the likely possibilities is missing BSIS line items. As it is a technical reconciliation issue, please create a message for processing.
    FBL3N report that you executed also points towards that. I hope that  you ran the report for all items posted in that period.
    If you ran it only for open items, then there is also a possibility of a possible clearing issue.
    Anyway , the best route will be to open a message in FI inconsistencies component and let SAP investigate further.,
    Best Regards,
    Shrikant

  • FAGLB03 Total does not match Drilldown total

    Hi Everyone,
    We are a Candian Company, so when I run FAGLB03 for a certain account in a US Company Code, and change the view to Document Currency (Canadian), I get a total equal to $0.00.
    However, when I drill down on that total, the line item display is reporting a significant balance.  I have changed my layout to include the different currencies - nothing matches the total of $0.00.
    Im just concerned the FAGLB03 total on the main screen, does not match the line item total...which one is correct, and
    why would this be happening?
    Thanks in advance,
    Rob

    Dear
    Please check the thread Re: FAGLB03 peroid balance not tallying with line items within
    Regards

  • Difference between cumulative balance and line items total in FS10N

    hi,
    when I am executing FS10n, I observed that the cumulative balance amount is not equal to line items total .  This is due to some amounts in previous years are varying from the line ltem totals in those periods of previous years.
    This is not happening with QA server only Prdn server is facing this problem.  Can anybody provide me a way to solve this..!?
    Regards,
    AJo
    I have checked the master data for the GL and the check box for line item display is selected. It has not been changed for years.
    Edited by: Anil Jonnalagadda on Oct 22, 2008 10:57 AM

    Hi Anil,
    The reason for the differences that you are viewing can be various. As the differences are found in the cummulative balance then it means that the differences might have occurred in previous fiscal years. The first stetp is to find when these differences were originated: You can run report SAPF190 (in se38) for previous fiscal years, and company code in question- This report should show the differences with message "Errors" in the log. If differences are found then you have to creeate a message and send it to SAP for further analysis and corrections.(only SAP experts can do this kind of corrections - component FI-GL-GL-X)
    Also bear in mind that if you did archiving in previous fiscal years then this would not be an error:
    If you already did archiving and secondary index deletion on this accounts with SAPF048I. So this explains why line items balance and GL summary balance differ ! There is no programm error.
    See consulting note 81489 which describes this issue:
    The balance of an account results from the balance of the open items. In
    connection with an archiving that has been carried out, the line item
    display - used with cleared items - must not therefore be interpreted as
    a balance display. For the balance display, there are separate
    correspond to the display balance of the open items from the line item
    display.
    Having archived and deleted secondary indexes ( with SAPF048I )
    for an account you can not use line item drill down as a balance
    display any more for a line item managed account.
    ( as not all line items are existing any more in table BSIS ! )
    The transactions meant to display the binding balances are  FS10N,
    FK10N and FD10N.
    They also give you the line items details, but only of those line
    items not yet deleted ( by SAPF048I ).
    kind regards,
    Oscar Diaz

Maybe you are looking for

  • WLI Process only execute one at a time

    Hi Guys, I am new to WLI, and have what could be a simple question: I have a seperate java program that puts messages one by one in sequence onto a JMS queue. I have built a channel and a JPD that subscribes to this channel. The purpose of the JPD is

  • Required XSLT Mapping tips!

    Hi I'm new for XSLT mapping in XI, right now we about do some XSLT mapping in current assignment. So please provide your basic help on regarding  this. Thank u, regarads..rambarki

  • Is it possible to play music in background on iPad?

    Is it possible to play music in background on iPad?

  • Moving in wrong direction????

    ok ive made this script what pushes this function into an array called unitArray. this goes on the first frame of unit. _root.unitArray.push(this) import mx.transitions.Tween; import mx.transitions.easing.*; this.onRelease = function(){ this.onMouseU

  • Project wise cost center

    Hello, Can we consider each project as a cost center in an organization? Thanks