Customization for Origin of sales tax ID number

hello,
I am trying to understand how Tax is being determined according to the field "Origin of sales tax ID number" which get to the sales order and Billing document.
I have a situation where the value of this field in the Billing doc is different then the Order and it is has different options. sometimes "sold-to" sometimes "ship-to".
Which customization affect the value of this field in the Billing document?
Regards,
Tomer Zimmerman

Hi Tommer,
  Check the path:  spro-sd-basic func---taxesmaintain sales tax ident  no.
  This field is used to control determination of the VAT registration number in the order and the billing document.
It is linked to determination of the tax classification.
If BLANK is set, then the standard prioirty ruls apply, as follows:
1. If PY has a VAT ID no. and PY <> SP, then the tax number and tax classification are taken from PY (the SH is no longer relevant).
The tax number is taken according to the 'tax country of destination'.
2. If 1 does not apply:
If SH has a VAT ID no. or SP has NO VAT ID no., then the tax number and the tax classification are taken from SH.
3. If 2 does not apply:
Tax number and tax classification are taken from the sold-to party.
If 'A' is set, then the tax number and the tax classification are generally taken from the sold-to party.
The tax number is taken according to the 'tax country of destination'.
If 'B' is set, then the tax number and the tax classification are generally taken from the payer.
The tax number is taken according to the 'tax country of destination'
Reward points if it helps.
Regards
Karan

Similar Messages

  • Origin of Sales Tax ID Number in billing document

    Hi
    In the billing Header, Taxes, there is a field "Origin of Sales Tax ID Number". Can you pls. guide me what is the mean of this field and how the value for that particular field is detemined.
    with regards

    Hi Lin
    The field "Origin sls.tax no." actually indicates that from where the VAT registration no. in Billing Document is coming. If you check the F4 help of this field then you will find that there are different option like - from Ship to party, Payer or Sold to Party etc. The determination rule is maintained in customising at IMG> Sales and Distribution>Basic Functions -->Taxes -->Maintain Sales Tax Identification No. Determination.
    Hope this will clear your doubt.
    Regards
    Amitesh Anand

  • Origin of sales tax ID number in billing documents

    Hello,
    The field "Origin of sales tax ID number" in billing documents determines from where the tax ID number is taken, for example:
       A - Ship-to party
       B - Payer
       C - Sold to Party
    When the partner functions of the customer are different, how can I decide whose tax ID number the billing document takes? I need to take the tax ID of the payer but it takes of the ship to party.
    Thanks in advance, best regards,
    Silvia

    hi,
    The path here is IMG, Sales and distribution, Basic functions, Taxes, Maintain sales
    tax—Identification number determination.
    Three available options can be assigned to each sales organization. It is recommended that in order to keep consistency throughout the system, use the same determining rules across all sales organizations.
    The first is determination rule A, which indicates that the tax number and tax indicator classification are generally taken from the sold-to party customer master record.
    Determination rule B indicates that the tax number and tax classification are generally taken from the customer master record of the payer.
    Finally, if the field is left blank, the system determines the tax number and the tax classification according to the following sequence:
    1.If the payer has a VAT registration number and is identical to the sold-to party, the tax number and tax classification are copied from the payer (in this case, the ship-to party is not relevant). The tax number is copied according to the country of destination relevant for taxes.
    2. If 1 does not apply, the ship-to party has a VAT registration number, and the sold-to party does not, the tax number and tax classification are copied from the ship-to party.
    3. If 2 does not apply, the tax number and tax classification are copied from the sold-to party.
    CHAN

  • Functional module for determining the sales tax code

    Dear all,
    Kindly help me is there any Functional module to determine the sales tax code?
    My Requirement is Based on the Country, Sales Org and Tax code Pricing should pick up automatically.
    I tried adding the same fields in the table and inserted in the access sequence and created the condition record for the same.
    Created the order but system is not able to get  the Tax code while determining the price?
    Please help ...
    Regards,
    SK

    My Requirement is Based on the Country, Sales Org and
         Tax code Pricing should pick up automatically
    but system is not able to get the Tax code while determining the price?
    Your both the above comments are contradict to each other. In the first statement, you say pricing should pick up automatically whereas, in the next statement, you say tax code is not determining.   Please indicate the requirement clearly.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Smartform for sales tax summary report

    Hi all!
    Is there a smartform for the Austrian sales tax summary report available? I have not found any hints At the moment, we "just" use a SAP-SCRIPT printout. Thank's for your help!
    Regards
    MARTIN JAGERSBERGER

    Hi Arvind,
    Check /people/navneet.dhami/blog/2010/11/04/some-useful-sql-scripts link and modify the query as per your requirement.
    Thanks,
    Neetu

  • Can system produce one single invoice for bulk of sales orders?

    Hie all...
    I have a few questions with regards to sales orders per Billing.
    1) Can the system cater for creation of only ONE Invoice for about 8,000 sales orders in one click of VF04?
    2) Is there a limit of sales order to be created in ONE Invoice? If there is, how much is the maximum limit?
    3) If can, will there be any performance issue to the system? Waht are the impact that we should be aware of?
    I've tested billing for lesser sales orders (execute VF04 for 5,427 s/orders only). However, the system still produce 2 Invoices and yet still has remaining 407 sales orders not processed.
    i have read the discussion about Billing line item here Re: Maximum no of lines in the Invoice but the issue is still uncleared to me.
    TQVM!
    Haryati haron

    Hie all.
    My appology for the above post. I have double check the bill and found the split analysis as mentioned by G.
    As this is my first time encounter the split scenario, would appreciate if anybody would share the knowledge on how to tackle my issue here. I found tHE split analysis as follows:
    Split due to different header data
                                                                                    Fld Name                        0300001429           0300001430
                                                                                    Country of Destination          MY                   SG
    Region (State, Province, Count  SL                   SG
    Country of Sales Tax ID Number  MY                   SG
    Reference Document Number       0300001429           0300001430
    Payment Reference               0300001429           0300001430      
    1) All sales order's Sold-to-Party hardcoded to onely one customer - e.g 10919 but different Ship-to-Party
    2) I assume that Country of Destn, Region and Country of Sls Tax Id data is taken from Customer master data but why does it takes Ship-to-Party customer master data? Can i change it to take Sod-to-party Master data?
    3) I believe i need to change the Origin sls tax no from A (Ship-to-Part) to C (Sold-to-Party) but can anybody pls help pointing out the tcode or menu path to do so? (TQ!).
    4)  believe also should point #4 above be resolved, Ref Doc No. and Payment Ref No. will not be an issue anymore.
    Appreciate any feedback.
    TQVM!
    3)

  • J1I2 - Sales Tax Register

    In the standard SALES TAX REGISTER report(TCode=J1I2) PO is picked up for a given Accounting Document Number irrespective of Fiscal Year and Company Code from EKBE table. Though rest of the tax details are OK, it is taking any first available PO matching Accounting Document Number(according to select statement). Since Material Document Year (GJAHR) is available in EKBE, sql statement can be changed to retrieve PO for a particular year, but there is no Company Code column in EKBE, how to retrieve a PO for a given Company Code now? Is there any other unique key in EKBE table related to Company Code or any related view to retrieve PO for a given Accounting Document Number,Fiscal Year and COmpany COde?
    Note: Only those POs should be retrieved whose PO history category should be either R or Q(available in EKBE)
    Regards,
    Imran

    Hi
    1. Which are the configs to be done?
    A.  Make sure thet the condition types accruals are created correctly with setoff and nonsetoff indicators.
    B. Make sure the condition records are maintained in FV11 for TAXINN and Tax percentages are given in taxcodes FTXP for TAXINJ proedure.
    C. Make sure the tax amount are calculated and updated during GRN and MIRO.
    D. Assign the tax procedure to your country in IMG.
    E. Make sure the g/l accounts are given in OB40 for TAXINN and in taxcodes for TAXINJ.
    2. Which are the condition types we use incase of INJ & INN for the same n How to check it in J1I2 ?
    For TAXINN:
    List of Condition Types that needs to be maintained
    For VAT
    For Deductible tax
    JVRD          -VAT RM Deductible (Raw Material)
    JVCD          -VAT CG Deductible (Capital Goods)
    For Non Deductible tax
    JVRN          -VAT RM Non-Deductible (Raw Material)
    JVCN          - VAT CG Non-Deductible (Capital Goods)
    For CST
    JVCS          -CST Non deductible
    For LST
    For Deductible
    JIPS          - Sales tax setoff
    For Non-Deductible tax
    JIPL          - Local Sales tax inventory.
    For Service Tax Setoff
    JSRT          -Serv Tax Set Off
    JEC3          -ECS SerTax SetOff
    JES5          -SECes on Service Tax
    For Service Tax Non Setoff (Custom defined conditions if required)
    ZHST          -A/P Serv Tax non-ded
    ZHSC          -A/PECS SerTax non-de
    ZHSS          -SECes on Serv. nonde
    TAXINJ:
    JIP3     IN: A/P ST setoff
    JIP1     IN:A/P CST
    JIP2     IN:A/P LST
    JSER     IN: Service tax
    JSVD     IN:Service tax debit
    JIN1     IN: A/R CST
    JIN2     IN: AR LST
    JIPS     IN Sales tax setoff
    JIPC     IN C Sales tax inv.
    JIPL     IN L Sales tax inv.
    JLS1     IN A/P LST out
    In J1I2 select the company code,fiscal year, tax code and the condition type with the adte range to get the output.
    Thx
    Raja

  • Sales Tax Calc (Line Item level calc versus header level calc)

    Hello,
    My company utilizes vertex to calculate sales and use tax in our sales orders that are created via resource related billing (DP96).
    We store tax code O1 using condition type UTXJ for each SD Contract.
    Condition types XR1 thru XR6 receive the sales tax calculations/amounts from vertex for EACH line in the billing request.
    See below example of calculated tax amount per line item
    Line1 of Bilreq:   NetVal  2.25     X tax rate for XR1 .05  = sales tax of 0.11  (rounded up to 2 decimal places)
    Line2 of Bilreq:   NetVal  2.25     X tax rate for XR1 .05  = sales tax of 0.11  (rounded up to 2 decimal places)
    Totals                             4.50                                                                  0.22
    When our invoice(billing document) is sent to our customer which shows just totals our customer sees:
    Net Amout:  4.50
    tax rate .05
    Sales Tax Amt:  0.22
    When our customer multiplies 4.50 by .05 they come up to 0.23
    So they are questioning why the calculation is incorrect and they want it to match to the penny.
    Anyone have any suggestions to solve this problem.
    Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Ermanno Incollingo

    Hello Ermanno
    Does your pricing Procedure have condition type DIFF just after the tax conditions XR 1-6?  If not, please review standard pricing procedure RVAXUS ( Step 917).
    Also try to use condition types NETP and PNTP  as described in OSS note  80183 - Rounding.
    Hope this helps. Thanks.

  • Discount After Excise & Sales Tax

    I have one scenario
    Vendor will give Discount, For which excise & sales tax will not be calculated.
    To fullfill this scenario where i have to put discount condition in pricing

    Hi Mr. Satya,
    For this scenario give the define the new discount condition type and assign at the end of the MM pricing procedure. In the discount condition give the subtotal as 6. This will solves your problem.
    Regards
    Satya

  • Sales tax on online orders

    I am unclear on the sales tax situation for online orders of iPads.
    Will I be charged sales tax if I order an iPad thru the Apple online store?
    If online orders are sales tax free why are there so may people lining up at stores to buy iPads (and other products for that matter) which will end up more expensive?

    OzLK wrote:
    I am unclear on the sales tax situation for online orders of iPads.
    Will I be charged sales tax if I order an iPad thru the Apple online store?
    If online orders are sales tax free why are there so may people lining up at stores to buy iPads (and other products for that matter) which will end up more expensive?
    Whether or not Apple (or any online merchant) collects and remits sales tax depends to a large extent on whether they have a retail presence in the state (in this case, if there are Apple Stores there). Another factor is whether the company does enough online business there that the state chooses to expend the resources to collect sales taxes even without a retail presence -Amazon.com, for instance, collects sales tax for sales in Tennessee because they do tons of business here and because many of their distributors and shippers use warehouses here which Tennessee has indicated a willingness to seize in lieu of the tax dollars. Consequently Amazon caved in and now collects taxes at the time of sale. Apple already has retail stores here so they collected taxes on my order at the time I placed it.

  • Extra sales tax Tallinn, Estonia, but error message FF753

    Hi all,
    Our customer in Estonia shall have an extra sales tax to their ordinary VAT. The new sales tax will apply from 1 of June 2010 according to new legal requirements. The invoicing to customer should be like this:
    Price without VAT: 100
    VAT 20%: 20
    Sales tax 1%: 1
    Total: 121
    At first I have not understood if this tax should apply on ordinary advance return for tax on sales but I guess so and why I created a new outgoing tax code with 1% VAT but to a new G/L account than the ordinary tax code. The new tax code also had accounting key MWS and condition type MWAS as the ordinary.
    When my SD-consultat created an ordinary invoice the ordinary tax code with 20% (U2) was posted to. But when he later should post a new invoice he had created a new condition type for this new sales tax: ZSTX. Calculation was done correct but no accounting document was created due to error message FF753; Tax code U2 does not appear in any G/L account item (U2 was the ordinary tax code).
    The tax codes look like this:
    Sales tax, new, S1:
    Output tax MWS 1% 110 100 MWAS
    Ordinary Tax code, old, U2:
    Oútput tax MWS 20% 110 100 MWAS
    In invoice it is like this:
    Condition type: MWSI output tax 20%
    Condition type: ZSTX sales tax 1%
    Calculation was correct but no accounting document according to error message FF753.
    I wonder if I must create a new condition type instead of MWAS but I don´t know?
    I am not good in tax and not in SD so please help me how we can post one tax amount to one tax code and one to another.
    BR L

    Hi Lisa,
    Check the  Note 1076560 - FF 753: SD tax doc if tax code has more than one condition.
    Might be it is a program error, just check.
    Thanks and regards
    Praveen.J

  • Routines for determine the customer tax classification in VF02

    Hi
    i have to find out how the customer tax classification values is coming in VF02.customer tax classification  value should be '0'.but in my case it is coming '1'.
    i have to find out ,how the calculations has to be done and where should i modify the value.it is an production support issue.
    Please guide me .what are the  possible ways to fix the issue.
    Regards,
    Kiran

    I'm assuming that, the country is India and based on its requirement:
    Sales tax is a state government revenue. There are two types of sales taxes, Local sales tax & central sales tax. Local sales tax is intra state whereas CST is inter state.
    Example of LST : Point of sale i.e. delivering plant & ship to party are within the same state. The rates are defined by the respective state governments.
    Example of CST : The Delivering plant & Ship to party geographic locations are 2 different states. At the point of sales from one state, the ST goes to that state govt. & consignment is despatched to the Ship to party. Once that consignment is received at the ship to party state, sales tax will be levied once the sales is registered there. For this case, the LST that is applicable by the Ship to party further will not be applicable in all probability to be captured in SAP.
    Stock transfer : This does not attract any sales tax. The consignment is transferred from one D plant to another D plant irrespective of inter/intra state sales. The invoice that is accompanied with the consignment thus shall not have any final value. It's a zero value invoice, but the basic prices needed to be mentioned.
    The selling organisations normally needs to register with the sales tax authority of the respective state to have a warehouse or D plant to avoid the double taxation for their dealers/distributors.
    Now, the pricing procedure that is there in 4.7 is Factory sale with formula-JFACT, in which the CST condition type is JIN1 & the LST is probably JIN2. There may be surcharge cond types as well which will calculate the amount on either JIN1 or JIN2.
    For config :
    1.SPRO > S&D > Basic fn. > Pricing > Pricing control > Define & assign Pric. procedure > Maintain Pric proc.
    2. The tax rates are normally driven from the Tax classification of Customer & Material access. To do this config, S&D >Basic fn. > Taxes. You need to include the condition type for country IN in 'Define tax determin rule'.
    3. Same path : But go to Tax relevancy of master records where you configure the condition type & options of rates that will flow to these masters. One needs to understand here properly as u need to have unique combinations for picking the sales tax rates. I will try to demonstrate the smallest example. Let's say, the LST rates are 2%,4% & 0%. I will have two options for material master here. 1 for taxable & 2 for not taxable.
    For customer master, I will have 1-LST 2%, 2-LST4% & 3-LST0%. When I create master records for LST thru VK11 for JIN2, I will chose the access where the combinations of customer & material tax classifications are available. If this access does not exist create it under an access sequence. But normally this is standard. The condition records will look like,
    Cust-Tax classi.          Material tax claasi.        Rate           Tax code
            1                                    1                         2%               A1
            2                                    1                         4%               A1
            3                                    1                         0%               A1
    Remember, rates are flown from the tax codes. Tax codes can be created thru T code FTXP. This is normally a FI job.
    Hope this info helps
    Regards
    Manthan.

  • For non valuated sale order

    Hi Freinds,
    I got the following error while doing customization for Non-valuated sale order. In the Requirement class i selected the 40 and went in to details and have not selected any thing in the field Valuation which means i want to have "Non valuated" sale order.
    Only special stock with separate valuation can be marked.
    Message no. VT387 Diagnosis It is only possible to price and mark for valued special stock, with reference to a sales document or a project. System Response Procedure Procedure for System Administration
    Any ideas in this regards, kindly share with me.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    siva

    thanks

  • Sales Order Line Number printing as it appears in UI

    Hi,
    I am trying to get the Line number in sales orders as it appears in the UI,but when i fetch the data from the underlying table i am getting a different value.Can any one help me out how to get the value as is from UI at line level.
    For Eg:
    The Sales order Line number is 1.1 in the UI,then the corresponding value when i fetch from the table is being displayed as 1.
    Thanks,
    Praveen

    select line_number||(decode(shipment_number,null,'','.'||shipment_number))
    ||(decode(option_number,null,'','.'||option_number))||
    (decode(component_number,null,'','.'||component_number))||
    (decode(service_number,null,'','.'||service_number)) LineNumber from apps.oe_order_lines_all where header_id= &head;
    Edited by: user9095588 on Feb 11, 2010 12:35 PM

  • While GR posting sale tax issue

    Hi ,
    U have one issue while posting GR for Partial Qty for ex 10 qty but we are maintained sale tax 2% in PO with QTY 100 for each qty price is 4556 .
    While posting GR for 10 qty sale tax is calculating for all 100 qtys .
    kindly provide  me the solution

    Hi,
    Remember that when you create a GR in WM your are now moving stock from MM to WM and depending on your storage type settings.
    EG When you post GR, you first move is stock is taken from intransit to storage type 902 and from 902 to the relevant storage type ie 500 behing your doors then from there you execute putaway.
    Movement of stock within storage type is done via Transfer Order.
    Double check if you transfer order is fully confirmed.
    Thanks,
    Silas

Maybe you are looking for