Customizing transaction authorization

Hello All ,
I am basically a technical person . when i execute the transaction 0VTC in development env it dont ask for the transport request while saving data. however, if i execute the same transaction in configuration client it asks...
please tell me why its happening and also is there any specific transaction which will enable/disable this check?
Please let me know asap..its require urgently...
Thanks,
Jigs.
Helpful ans will be rewarded.

Jigs,
That depends on the transaction itself. Some transactions do have different options such as a parameter setting to create a transport when modified. Other times, for certain tables, the definition of the table in SE11 has an impact.
Also, the client role setting in SCC4 has an impact. Client role Customizing, Test, Production ect.
Cheers,
Ben

Similar Messages

Custom transaction authorization

Hi,
I have a custom transaction which calls a custom table. And as there's no ABAP code for that, it's not possible to enter ABAP statement - AUTHORITY-CHECK to check any data before user run custom transaction.
Is it possible to restrict custom transaction in this scenario ?
Thanks..

Thank you all for your answers. But I know what you all are talking about.
Well, let me be specific. I have 3 companies and all are using same custom table. And I have a custom transaction code which points to custom table for table display/update access.
Now, as there's no ABAP code for custom transaction, I can't insert AUTHORITY-CHECK to restrict one company's data from others.
So in this case, is there any way I can restrict custom transaction for authorization check, which would be inserted in user's profile, for specific company code value ?
I know you can do it using TSTCA table: insert authorization object and value and then check against user's profile. But would like to know what other folks are doing.
Cheers...

Authorization for customized transaction

Hi,
In our system, developers create one transaction ZSIDUPDATE.
Whenever I (Basis Admin) hit this transaction, error "No Authorization for Transaction" is occurred. I don't understand why the error is for authorization for this customized transaction because I have SAP_ALL & SAP_NEW profile.
Can anybody give the solution?
Regards,
Rajesh

Hello Rajesh,
Check the report behind ZSIDUPDATE. I suppose there must be some kind of code which will allow only certain user to execute it based on their user ids. Either the user ids will be hardcoded or else they are being picked up from some table. This is not a classical authorization error. You may set a trace also but debugging is best. it will crack it open in seconds.
Regards.
Ruchit.

VENDOR and Customer master Authorization

Hi Experts
I have requirement about vendor & customer master authorization.client requirement is if a user had created vendor or customer under a purchase organization or sales organization so in this case other Purchase org users shouldn't see any details about this vendor and even they shouldn't be allowed to post to this invoices.even in FBL1N and FBL5N user shouldn't see other region vendor or customer line items.how to handle to this can any one help me on this.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Diwa

Hi,
Just a thought;
Why can't you create a user specific validation for FB60 or other t.codes if wanted, which says that;
If the condition 'Vendor code starts with say 1* series', is met;
then display an error message 'Posting not possible for this Vendor Group XXXX'
This way, you can prevent certain users from posting transactions to a certain vendor groups.
Thanks,
Nirav

Custom Transaction Types, Subject Profiles etc...

Hi all,
Did anyone worked on custom Transaction Type on SDCR?
I know that this is CRM specific stuff to configure, but want to check what are the implications in modifying exisiting SDCR.. Well, in the meanwhile, we need to work on custom Code Groups, Subject Profiles etc..
What is the impact on upgrades if we modify the SAP defined Transaction Types SDCR?
Please correct me if I am wrong in my approach.
Response is greately appreciated.
Regards,
Mike.

Thanks for response.
I tried to copy and modify the subject profiles, catalogs etc. I could able to create Change Request with the custom transaction type, but not able to authorize the change request. And I am using SAP defined action profile for custom transaction type.
And also little bit confused how to attach the custom change request to support message (we need to select the action item "create change document"). It seems there are lot of modifications to be done all the way from support message to urgent/normal correction.
Please advice.
Regards,
Mike.

Create custom transaction on the base of RSDMD to populate bw master data

Hello All,
my client is asking me if there is a possibility to create a custom transaction on the base of standard transaction RSDMD to populate the master data manually allowing the users to see only selected master data.
we have a SAP BW and APO on the same system.
the client ask if we can have a control level if the master data call other infoobjects for example (hierarchy market call the infoobjects LEV1, LEV2 etc) we can do in a manner that is not possibile to insert new valus but only to combine existed values?
Thanks for All
Bilal

Make all master data infoobjects authorization relevant and custom profile accordingly to the users in the standard authorizations and analysis authorizations.
This will enable users to see only certain master data in their queries ( analysis authorizations ) and in their data display ( standard authorizations) instead of custom transaction.

Cretaion of custom BW Authorization

Hello BW/BI Gurus,
I have facing one problem while creating Custom BW Authorization.
Steps followed for the same:-
1-Define the ZRISKLVL InfoObject as Authorization Relevant
2-Create a reporting authorization object for this InfoObject -This would be done through transaction RSSM
3-Assign the authorization object to the relevant InfoProviders.
4-Now, Go to PFCG Create roleassign manually Authorization (ZRISKLVL), but the values are not coming Master data ID field
Please help me to resolve this problem.
Thanks in advance!!!!!!!!!
Thanks and Regards,
Jagat

Hello Sahu,
Nothing is coming or available in SU53.
If I am right SU53 is used to find missing Authorization, here in BW I am creating new Authorization.
Thanks and Regards,
Jagat

Error for customer specific Authorization check (User Exit)

Dear Experts,
I am facing a problem in PM.
I have created a maintenace plan for calibration via t code IP42 and mentioned the order type PM05. Scheduling is done for the order. I got the order number.
I have released the order and got the inspection lot number.
While entering the results recording through t code QE17, the reluts are out of the specified range, i have given the valuation Rejected, immediately system is giving an error message as below:
"Error for customer specific Authorization check (User Exit)"
Though there is no user exit activated in the system, this message is coming and not allowing the result recoring for rejection.
If I'm entering the result recording within the specified range, then valuation is Accepted and its allowing to save.
I have checked the following user exits:
QQMA0002: QM: Authorization Check for Entry into Notif. Transaction
QQMA0026: PM/SM: Auth. check when accessing notification transaction.
The above 2 User Exits are not active.
I have also checked a note 429066. But it says incase of any dump for that user exit only its applicable and more over the current version of the system is ECC 6.0 packae 15, where as that note is applicable upto 4.6C.
Please some one help me on this issue.
Thanks and Regards,
Praveen.

Dear Pete,
I have cheked with my technical team, There is no hotpacks updated recently. This is the implementaion project I'm in, so performing the cycle for the first time.
Any how I got it solved, in T code QE17, after entering the Inspection lot in next screen goto menu path Settings - User settings - Defects recording mention the reprt type and tick on Reprt type Changable.
At the time of result recording if the valuation is Rejected then it ask for defects recording close that window if not rwequired then save, the error message no longer apperaing now.
Regards,
Praveen

The scope of the customer-specific authorization object

Dears,
Could someone please feedback about the scope of the customer-specific authorization object; e.g. if we are to create a customer-specific authorization object to replace authorization object P_ORGIN in the HR module, to be able to add an extra authorization field to the newly created authorization object, the scope of the newly create authorization object (which will have a new validation code generated by report RPUACG00) will be the whole ERP system ?
The worry is caused by the fact that P_ORGIN is already used in several authorization roles granted to users in the different ERP modules (i.e. FI, SD, MM, CS), so the replacement would affect these modules.
Thanks.
Reda

Hello Reddy,
We are about to implement the HCM module (We are now in the testing
phase), on the same client as that of our SAP ERP implementation.
We need to authorize on the personnel number grouped by 'Payroll Area'
in transactions PA30, PA40
In authorization object P_ORGIN, the field VDSK1 is already used to
authorize on an attribute : cost center (organizational key) for each
organizational unit, so we can't configure it to authorize on other
fields from info type 0001 (e.g. Payroll Area).
We need to continue using the conventional / general authorization and
not the structural authorization, to stay in compliance with our
authorization schema already implemented in our FI, MM, SD & CS modules.
( Also, as per thread : Steps for creating structural authorization profile using trans. OOSP
the structural authorization cannot be used to authorize on Payroll Area.)
We need to go through the HR module implementation without any changes
in the ABAP code.
So, the last way out is the custom-specific authorization object, and as I mentioned before, the authorization object P_ORGIN was already used in other ERP modules; e.g. FI, MM, SD & CS,
( Note : I haven't started yet implementing this solution.)
Thanks.
Reda

SE16 Custom Transaction

Any idess to create custom transaction for SE16? I have read many forums but didn't get a straight answer. My requirement is to provide 100 + tables access to business without SE16/SE16N. I can create custom authority check to validate table name before displaying the table contents. Tried copying RS_TABLE_LIST_CREATE function module and studied S_TABU* authorizations, no luck. Also I dont wanted to create query for each table and creating individual table access transactions (variant transaction). Please help me to give a straight answer, I would really appreciate it. Thank you.

Hi,
You can restrict the tables by following either of the 2 methods. But this will work only for pre-defined tables only as you need to provide table names.
1. Create a Z- set using GS01. And maintain all the relevant table names. Later on inside the program you can evaluate the set from table 'SETLEAF'. If the table name is maintained then check will pass and you can display the table else provide an error message.
2. In your custom auth object have one field named say TABNAME. While assigning authorization to the user you can maintain the relevant table names against this field.
I would suggest to go for the 1st option as it will be more flexible in nature and can be maintained in the client directly (authrization to limited users only like some central team). Maintaining in roles will be a bit more tedious as it will involve modification to the roles each time you change table names.
Hope this will solve your purpose.
Regards
Pradipta K Mishra
Edited by: Pradipta Kumar Mishra on Mar 5, 2012 5:10 AM

To restrict a user from using a custom transaction

Hi,
I have a created a custom transaction ZTEST. Now i want only a few users to use this and not all. How can i achieve this. I see an authorization object in the SE93. But can anybody explain me in detail regarding the same ?
Regards,
Pramod

Hi
We can use authorization to restrict the access to a perticular transaction. Permitted Activity configurations are performed into it.
Before a User can be granted permission by the Authorization Object, the Users Master Record is assigned a Role, which includes a Profile.
The Profile contains what is simply called the Authorization and is where the specific data for the Authorization Objects field is assigned to the configured Permitted Activity.
You need to create a role or modify any existing role, using t code pfcg . On the authorizations tab in Maintain Authorization Data and Generate Profiles, press the Change Authorization Data button.
On the next popup screen named Choose Template, select the Do not select templates option.
Press the button Manually, and enter the authorization abject attached in your transaction.Select the Tick button to continue.
Expend all the nodes.
Press edit icon or line 'activity'. and choose the one which you want to allow to user.
Generate the Authorization using the generation.
Now all the users who has a role attached which you edited or created, will not be able to execute that t code.
go to t code su01 to attach role to perticular user.
Regards
Vishal Kapoor

Creation of custom Transaction for confirm goods in SRM

Hi Experts
i need to create a custom transaction same as standard one for confirm goods/servics in SRM portal.
In sap GUI, the transaction is BBPCF03
Can you please suggest any good sources where i can learn to Custome Tcodes for my requirement
Thanks in advance
Edited by: kittu reddy on Nov 19, 2008 7:27 AM

Hi Hussaini,
Here are the steps.
1> Customization needs to be completed in SPRO. Logistics Execution -> Mobile Data entry section. Also compare entries with LM01 for understanding.
2> In the 'Define menu management', you can create dynamic menus. For Menu or transaction type, if you enter "1", a menu appears; if you enter "2", a transaction appears. Custom transactions can be created and assigned here.
Once that is done, when you execute LM01 you will see your custom transactions come up. Make sure that these are created keeping in mind the RF device screen size and limitations.
Regards,
Anand.

Custom Transaction using RSDMD to go to MD Screen Directly

Hi,
I have created a custom transaction for Master Data Maint. which uses RSDMD and the InfoObject name.
By using this custom transaction I can reach to
the screen to filter the records. Here I click on
execute (F8) to reach the actual data.
I used SHD0 to create this custom-transaction.
How do I include the "execute / F8" functionality in my custom transaction, so that when I use custom-transaction I can go directly to the data.
Would appreciate your help.
Thank you,
Pramod.

Hi Mark,
Your design of going for Name01, Age01 , Date01.....
is absolutely correct. Stdandard SAP even does the same thing.
Regarding the dump...you can do one thing..try referring
standard infotypes which uses table control like Basic pay infotype 0008.
If you get any help from there then its fine..or just post send the dump analysis (point 3 of dump) to forum i guess from that definitely we can conclude at the reason for dump...
Enjoy SAP.
Pankaj

How to Run a Custom Transaction in Back Ground after give the Input?

Hi,
I have problem that how to execute a Custom Transaction in Back Ground after end user will save a variant for input. In my Transaction there is no menu to save a Variant & to Execute in Back Ground.
Please suggest me how to do this in my Custom Transaction.

Hi Ramana,
what kind of report you want to execute? the report is Executable Report or Modulepool prog. ??
if it is a executable program so when u execute (F8) from SE38 when u find the selection-screen in the menu bar ->Program ->Execute in Background( F9) option exits there u can schedule your report in Background or else use toce SM36 ( Define Background Job).
Why you want to run it in background with transaction code if you have this options?
Regards,
Sunil kairam.

Error while calling Receipt Un-application :Customer Transaction Identifier has taken a precedence over the transaction number

Hi All,
While calling the receipt Un-application API, I am getting a error like' Customer Transaction Identifier has taken a precedence over the transaction number'
Kindly suggest as to how can I troubleshoot this?
Appreciate your valuable Inputss

Hi,
i recommend having a Service request logged for this issue, as from related documentations in metalink most of them seemed to be a bug where oracle suggested patches (code Fixes) ... hence reaching oracle support would be a better approach ...
Regards,
Ivruksha

Customizing transaction authorization

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for