Data in cube is different from psa in the production system

hi friends
this is very urjent ,the data is fine and same as r/3 in psa.for example i have sales for one article ie billing
2lis_13_vditm . which picked the data from r/3 when i see the records in the psa they r good when tried to see the same record in cube record is not avalible in the cube . only few records are filtered out inbetween psa to cube which is leading to lot of data inconsistency . they r no routines which can filter out the data . only standard sap routines .which updates the data to cube . what could be the problem . any help is apperciated and helpful and will be rewarded. thanks in advance for kind replays.

veda,
In a cube the data gets added up for similar records -
Do you have the same number of records in PSA and Cube ?
if yes - then maybe there exist similar records and the KF is getting summed up in the result.
Also how did you search for the same record in the cube ? since the characteristics go into the dim tables and all that is in the fact table is only dim ids and KFs ...
Do one thing - can you try a report on the cube and check if the data is getting summed up.
Or another workaround - put the PSA Data into an Excel file ( flat file ) and then upload it into an ODS with the same records in Production - you will know if multiple records exits and thereby find out what the problem is due to. ( Bad workaround - but cannot do it in Production)
Arun

Similar Messages

Data in cube is different from what I loaded

A strange problem just happened... I loaded a cube from a flat file and everything looked OK. PSA has correct data. Update and transfer rules are direct assignments. nevertheless one of the characteristics change its value. I do not think a conversion routine has any influence on this although I could be wrong. For example I loaded a flat file with A = '050501' and the cube table gets loaded with '500005'. I've debugged up to update rules and the value is always correct.
If I load the cube through SEM the same thing happens. I write a value and a different value is written in the infocube.
Have any of you experienced the same issue?

How do you see the data in master data? Do you see 050501 or 50005.
Conversion may have an influence. Do you mind to delete the data in the cube, remove the conversion routine of the info object, and reload.
When you say i also loaded thru SEM, what that means?
Ravi Thothadri

Infocube turned out differently from PSA

Hi,
In BI 7.0, if i have confirmed that the content of PSA is what i expected, but the content in the fact table of the infocube turned out differently. How do I rectify the mistakes? It should be something to do with the transfer or update rules, but how do i check those?
Thanks

Hi Lip,
If you feel that data in Cube is different from what is there in the PSA, then it could be that there are some routines written in the Transformations.
When you are checking for Data Reconciliation, you can proceed as follows.
Check for the Data in the Source System --> RSA3,
Check the Data in PSA in BW(SAP BI)
Check the Data in the InfoCube.
For test purposes you can take a few records and check if any Transformations are taking place and after that do the reconciliation.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Tom.

Looking for SAP solution to extract data from the production system

Hello,
we are looking for the SAP standard tool to extract data from the production system and copy it to the development system. It should be as functional as some kind of partial client copy. The data, which we need to replicate is master and transactional data from FI, CO, AA MM and nice to have FS-RI modules. There is a product offered by the IntelliCorp called "Data Management" but we would like to know if SAP offers its own product.
Kind regards,
Krzysztof Murkowski

Hi,
SAP offers a solution called 'Test Data migration Server' or TDMS.
You can access the master guide from the below link:
https://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_FRAME=CONTAINER&_OBJECT=011000358700006332942006E
Cheers !!
Satya.
PS: Pls reward points if the answer was helpful...Thx.

How does the production system take the benefit from user-exits.

How does the production system take the benefit from user-exits.

and it is not the production system that benefits. its the company and the people working with SAP that benefits from the user exits which allow SAP to be altered for the company specific situations.

How does the PRODUCTION SYSTEM take the benifit from the USER EXITS?

how does the PRODUCTION SYSTEM take the benifit from the USER EXITS?
please explain

and it is not the production system that benefits. its the company and the people working with SAP that benefits from the user exits which allow SAP to be altered for the company specific situations.

I would like to buy Adobe Acrobat pro 9 from ebay. The product was not deactivated, since the pc and the company no longer exists. Can I buy and activate the product ?

I would like to buy Adobe Acrobat pro 9 from ebay. The product was not deactivated, since the pc and the company no longer exists. Can I buy and activate the product ?
(There is no possibility to ask Adobe. The chats are not working. No other contact is available.)
http://www.ebay.de/itm/Adobe-Acrobat-9-PRO-Win-Vollversion-/141450672967?pt=Software&hash= item20ef1dfb47

http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/transfer-product-license.html describes what must be done by the buyer AND the vendor. If you both cannot comply, the license cannot be transferred.

Master Data: 2 records with different FROM-TO dates

Hi,
I am extracting the master data from R/3. In R/3 the master data record is created with valid FROM: 01/01/1900 and valid TO: 12/31/9999. But when I extract the data into BW it is coming as 2 records one with 01/01/1000-12/31/1899 range and the other with 01/01/1900-12/31/9999.
What settings/steps I need to change to get only one record for now and of course in future any change to the records will comes as different valid date range.
When I schedule the info package, the update tab consist of Fixed time interval start date: 10/20/2005; end date: 12/31/9999.
Time being to avoid this in the transfer rule of FROM date info object selected constant option with date 01/01/1900 as in R/3????
Appreciate your help on this.
Thanks.
Sudha.

Hi Nagesh,
Thanks for reply.
I have assigned one-to-one from R/3 to BW.
In R/3 I have FROM and TO date and assigned these two fields to Transfer structure FROM and TO info objects.
I have maintained Transfer rule only after getting two records into BW for every one entry in R/3. In the rule I just assigned constant date to avoid 2 records for every entry from r/3. So nothing to do with the routine.
I want to see one record in BW for every entry coming from R/3. At present in the BW master data sitting as 2 records.
Example:
one record in R/3 with:
FROM date: 01/01/1900; TO date: 12/31/9999.
Inserted 2 records into BW with:
FROM date: 01/01/1000; TO date: 12/31/1899.
FROM date: 01/01/1900; TO date: 12/31/9999.
Thanks.
Sudha.

[help]why data on table (master ) different from materialized view(slave)?

We have had Oracle RAC 2 Groups (master and slave).
We have created materialized from slave to master. and I have created materialized view log on master .
When slave group job is broken a long time(12 Hrs). We refreshed job and runned job id.
But I have found database on materialized view (slave) different from TABLE on master group. (m$log =0row)
Please tell me how can we resolve Or because that problem is m$log

Yes I do have a unique identifier on each record in the base table and therefore also in the MV.
So now the Downstream application has to update some of its own database tables based on what is in the MV that I provide - just so I understand how would that work e.g.:
1. MV gets refreshed from my base table every minute
2. Some records are newly inserted and some simply updated
and this is the part I don't understand (I might be missing something obvious)....
3. Downstream application interrogates the MV every (say 1-2 minutes) and updates its own tables based on the data there.....but let's say MV contains 10,000 records and in the last minute 100 of those records have been updated and another 100 inserted - how will it know the 200 records it needs to pull?
Thanks again

Data Load for 20M records from PSA

Hi Team,
We need to reload a huge volume of data (around 20 million records) of Billing data (2LIS_13_VDITM) PSA to the first level DSO and then to the higher level targets.
If we are going to run the entire load with one full request from PSA to DSO for 20M records will it have any performance issue?
Will it be a good approach to split the load based on ‘Billing Document Number’?
In Case, If we the load by 'Billing Document Number'; will it create any performance issue from the reporting perspective (if we receive the data from multiple requests?) Since most of the report would be ran based on Date and not by 'Billing Document Number'.
Thanks
San

Hi,
Better solution put the filter based on the year and fiscal year.
check the how many years of data based on the you can put filter.
Thanks,
Phani.

Filing date of judgement is different from date listed on credit report.

So first, let me say that my judgement is due to fall off in April of next year. If it weren't for reading so many success stories and having many of my own (including an early deletion of the last paid collection account on Experian just yesterday) I might be willing to leave well enough alone. The problem is, the paid judgement is the last bad item on my report. I just called the circuit court where my judgement was filed because the dates seemed off. I have copies of the money orders that I sent to pay the judgement and all of them were AFTER the judgement file date listed on my credit reports. According to the clerk, my judgement was actually filed on January 12, 2009 not April 16, 2009. My question is, aren't civil judgements supposed to fall of 7 years from the filing date or is this the case of the 7 years 180 days I've heard about? Did my payments somehow reage the judgement? If the date is indeed wrong, what is my next course of action? If the judgement rightfully is due to fall of January of 2016 I am within the 6 month range for requesting good will early deletion from at least two of the CRA's, correct? I'd really like to buy a house next year at the best rate possible and my Fico scores are EX 709, TU 719, and EQ 721. I’m hoping this removal will help me get the best rate possible. Thanks in advance for any insights/ opinions given.

Thanks for the docketing info! I'll start the ball rolling on that Monday. Regardless, if I can get the dates changed or no,t it's good to know that I have a possiblity of getting early exclusion on judgements as well. From what I read on this forum you can get a judgement vacated if he was improperly served. You can request the service info from the court where the Judgement was placed. I, like Rebuilding, didn't show up for my court date because I assumed that being in contact and negotaiting payment was all I needed to do and judgement would be thrown out the window. Yeah I know, stupid. Wow, if my judgement falling off netted me 66 points I would keel over. It's my last baddie and the only bad thing on all three reports so my fingers are crossed. Experian is an interesting one. In my case, they seem to hang on to anything and everything. The other CA's dropped most of my stuff a few months early without me even having to request it. The only thing I had left was the judgement and one collection on Experian. I called them mid june to ask for early deletion of the collection( 2 months ealy) because I heard they would remove it 3 months early. They turned me down, but I was very polite and thanked them for their time when they told me to call back April 1. I called them July 1 and after being transfered once my collection was removd. The phone call took less than 5 minutes. It was due to fall of August 16 of this year. The number I called was 1-800-360-7580. Note this account was not my oldest account and it was shown as being in collections so I wasn't in danger of having my Aaofa taking a hit. Oh, one last thing. I don't think it's odd that one report had collections info that another doesn't. They not only differ in how long they keep stuff( my point about Experian having a collection nobody else had) I also think it depends on who the collector reports the info to I'll update if I get my judgement updated and EE. Otherwise Kaylavaand I will have our judgement removal day party April 16th of next year!

In B2c - How to Pass Additional Data from UI to the Backend Systems in SAP?

Just wondering in SAP b2c how can I set/transfer data from UI to the back end database/SAP after confirmation step?
Edited by: Sayed Ahmed on Jul 27, 2008 6:47 AM

Hi,
Just use extension data methods to send the data to backend systems.
This method is clearly mentioned in the above links.
If you want to send the data to a new function module then follow this process.
[How To Call Function Module in E-Commerce|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Snippets/HowToCallFunctionModuleinE-Commerce]
and
[How To Import and Export data to Function Module|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Snippets/HowToImportandExportdatatoFunctionModule]
Regards,
Sateesh Chandra

Creating a test database from backups of the production

Hello Experts,
I am a newbie with very much new in Oracle. I have been provided with the inc0 backup(which comprises even the controlfile backup) of the production database (PROD) taken through RMAN and asked to create a new test database (TEST) using the backup. Can anyone please provide me the steps on how to restore it and create the new database ?
Database version 10.2.0.4
I am aware of duplicate database concept using RMAN, but I have been asked to not to connect to the target (PROD) database while duplicating. So, I need to create the test database by using the backup of prod database without connecting to PROD database. Please guide me.

Refer
http://arjudba.blogspot.in/2008/05/restore-and-recover-database-to-new.html
RMAN restore database from another backup of different database name
When you are restoring using the backup of the production database, the db_name would be same on the auxiliary database. Once you restore and recover the database in your test server, you can change the db_name from prod to test by recreating the controlfile

Data Differs From SOST and the Received Mail

hi experts,
I send a program as an HTML alert . But the problem is that sometimes the alert is not received Completely . Some columns are truncated or some rows are omitted where as if i check in SOST it is appearing Correctly , but when the mail is received , it is having the problem. Could some on help me on this please?.
with thanks in advance,
Syed Ibrahim G

Hi,
you say sometimes it's truncated.
What means sometimes ?
Is it depending on the receiver of the data or the program name or what else?
Regards,
Klaus

Cubes with different dimensions based on the same fact table

I have a fact table (f_a) with three dimensions (dim_a, dim_b, dim_c) and a one measure (m_a).
Is it possible to create cube with only one dimension (dim_a)?
Data for other two dimensions (dim_b, dim_c) should be aggreagated together.
Of course i can create second fact table with only one dimension, and then creating that cube would be no problem.
But is it possible doing this directly from the primary fact table (without creating second fact table)?
Raf
PS:i use AWM 9.2 to create target cubes. Source cubes i create with OEM 9.2

At the beginning i was confused by the numberous kind of cubes...
for example when i created cube in MS i just designed cube, picked fact table, and that's all. In Oracle firstly i create project of cube (first cube) in OWB. Then i export it to the OLAP Catalog (second cube). That cube in OLAP catalog is a source cube for the AW cube (third cube). Then i need to enable AW cube for OLAPI by creating another cube in OLAP Catalog (i use 9iR2, so OLAPI doesn't have direct access to AW cubes).
I spent much time until i could see my first sample cube in Discoverer or Excel as a final user should see it. :-)
Now i'm facing another problem - when you redesign cube (for example add another dimension), you can't just "refresh" it as it was in MS. You have to delete old cube and create new one. And deleting cube isn't so simple (i'm not sure which elements i should delete).
For testing and learning purposes i just create every cube in seperate AW. deleting whole AW is much simplier that deleting one cube.
Raf

Data in cube is different from psa in the production system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for