Data Mismatch problem in Production system

Dear Experts,
We have been encountering serious data mismatch problems with our source system since 29th Dec 2010.
We have realized this mismatch only on 11th Jan 2011. So, we have deleted entire data from 29th Dec 2010 onwards to 11th Jan 2011. Then we tried to load delta again as per our Process Chain sequence. Since then, our production system has become very inconsistent. We found that the entire data from 29th Dec 2010 to till date is started giving mismatch.
Our system got damaged in terms of data drastically. If I delete any bad requests from our Cubes & Data Store Objects, the next time when we try to load data, cube & Data Store Objects is showing the deleted request no. is not updated properly. Because of this, our Process chain is daily failing to complete and giving so many technical errors. We are totally confused to restore our data from 29th Dec 2010 to till date.
Can any one please help us to restore our data fully and Process Chain to run successfully...............?
Thanks in Advance,
Suman

Hi Suman,
I understood that you are using 3.x version of BW
such kind of issues occurs if you distrub the delta sequence by deleting the requests without making them red.
you can resolve this two ways......
1) Go to reconstruction tab of the DSO and CUBE, select all the req from 29th Dec 2010 thru 11th Jan 2011 and reconstruct them. once they appear in the request tab. make all the requests to red (set the QM status to RED) one by one and delete them from the CUBE and DSO.
This should set the delta status back to 29th and you will be able to run a repeat delta from then in your next delta.
2) Go to RSRQ and give the SID or the Request ID one by one that it is giving you ( request no. which is not updated properly)
Mke the QM status as RED for all of them.
Since you have already deleted them from the targets, just changing the QM status to RED will be sufficinet.
You have make the QM status to RED inorder to inform the system that the requset is incorrect one and has been deleted.
Once it is set to RED, system will not prompt any req and say "request no.# not updated properly".
i suggest you the second option.
Once you resume the delta load, it should run successfully.....and if you feel some data is still missing from 29th Dec 2010 thru 11th Jan 2011, just run a full repair load the get the data back.
If your Datasource is of LO extraction u may need to fill the setup tables to perform full repair.
Please let me know if the Datasource is of LO extraction. Also let me know once the issue is resolved.
Regards,
Sudheer.
Edited by: Sudheer Kumar Kurra on Jan 22, 2011 7:58 AM
Edited by: Sudheer Kumar Kurra on Jan 22, 2011 8:03 AM

Similar Messages

Error while extracting the data in R/3 production system,

Hi Team,
We got the following error while extracting the data in R/3 production system,
Error 7 When Sending an IDoc R3 3
No Storage space available for extending the inter 44 R3 299
No storage space available for extending the inter R3 299
Error in Source System RSM 340
Please guide us to fix the issue

It´s very difficult to help you without knowing
- what is going to be transferred
- where you get this error
- system configuration
- actual memory usage
- operating system
- database and configuration etc. etc.etc. etc.
I suggest you open an OSS call and let the support have a look on your system. It´s much easier if one has system access to find out the cause for that problem.
Markus

Delta INIT problems in production system

hi!
How do you do, I hope all fine, well, I have a problem in production system, I execute the delta init and the data is in BW the problem is when I want to activate the data, the system give me a processing error, somebody can helpme please?
BR

Hi
Please check with your Basis team to confirm there are enough resources.
Also Check what is max work process time . Tcode RZ11 parameter rdisp/max_wprun_time
Check this thread which mentions a lot of related notes.
Link: [Re: DSO-data activation issue;
Regards
Sanjyot

Proxy generation Problem in Production system

Hi Experts,
I have consumed WSDL file and created Client Proxy in development system.which is working fine
After testing it is Transported to the Quality system and Production system both.
In Quality system Proxy is generated properly and functioning properly.
But in Production system, Proxy is not generated and even in Tcode SE80 it is not displaying.
How to solve this problem?
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Jagesh

Hello Experts,
After Transporting Request to Production systems, all Dictionary objects are also created but Only Proxy is not created(Not appearing in SE80 under the respective package name).
Please help me in this.
Regards
Jagesh

Data mismatch between BI & BW system

Hi,
Recently, we have migrated from BW 3.5 to BI 7.0. All the Objects, Infocubes & Queries are also migrated. Some of the Reports are maintained in both BI & BW.
Let me come to the problem. We have a same Query in both BI & BW system. Same Data is loaded through Flat file to both BI & BW system on a weekly basis i.e every monday. In BI, the query is created from Infocube & in BW it is from ODS. When we execute the query the data in BI system differs from that of BW. I checked in the Manage tab of the Infoproviders in both the system, the number of Records transferred is the same. But when i go in and see the contents, the total value of Records differs, it is more in BI & less in BW. I couldnt check the data with the Flat file.
I donno where the problem is & why the data in both the system differs when the same data is loaded in both the systems. Help me in fixing this issue.
Thanks,
Murali

Check the following.
DSO stores detailed data and Cube stores agreegated data, so never compare No.of records... But the totals should match.
When u said, we have migrated from BW 3.5 to BI 7.0. All the Objects, Infocubes & Queries are also migrated.
If u have any routines, and migrated from 3.5 to 7.0, u never get right values until and unless u manipulate those routines manually.
If query totals are NOT matching with infoprovider totals, and if u have any hierarchies, due to some reasons data will go under unassigned nodes of hierarchy..so when u filter data based on hierarchy, u have take the unassigned nodes into consideration.
Edited by: Mr. V on Aug 21, 2008 5:46 PM

RE: Workflow binding problem in Production system(urgent)

Hi Experts,
Currently we transported our workflows to production server. When one of the user tested our workflow it failed. On Analysis I could find that the data are not passed from method to task container but method is working fine separately. Even I tried executing t-code 'SWU_OBUF' , but still not working.
Pls let me know of the solution .
Thanks,
Bharath

Check for linkages. Is the binding activated betwwen workflow to task container.
Check whether values appear in task container or not.
Then check for binding between task & method container. Is there any event linked with the task. Is the event linkage is activated.
The problem might be resolved if all the linkages are correct.

EIC- Data Inconsistencies in Productive System

Dear EIC Experts,
Have a query regarding data inconsistencies in the productive system. I will illustrate with an example,
An Activity was created and a follow up activity created on that and assigned to a resolver group.
There is an entry in SCMG_T_CASE_ATTR with Status 20 (Allocated)
and an entry in THREIC_ACTIVITY, with a whole load of data like creator org unit and owner org unit missing, all it has are the activity categories and the user id.
An entry exists in THREIC_FOLLOWUP with all relevant fields filled but Worlflow ID is blank. The status in this table is 40 (delivered).
So it looks as if no workflow was created and it did not go to anybody to action. And the activity cannot be closed and is just lying there, as the owner cannot take any action till the follow up status becomes completed.
1) What could be the possible reasons for this to happen? I have already checked that workflows are all activated and there are other activities being raised and clsoed just fine.
2) Is there anyway I can use any utility tools to correct the data in the back end in such a way that thia activity can be clsoed down?
I have a few hundred activities like these (from 30000 overall activities) which cannot be closed because of various data inconsistencies. Any ideas are appreciated.

Hi Harish
I have worked on multiple EIC implementations and I have never had this issue though the follow up functionality has been set up correctly and by the details in your email my guess is that it is not at your location.
It is possible to fix these 100 or so and set them to closed but it is to much to type out in this forum.
I would check out www.eicexperts.com as they are experts in EIC and they may walk you through it as they are very helpful.

Data mismatch with ECC FBL5N report and debtor ageing report(BI side)

Hi,
I am facing a data mismatch problem with FBl5N(t-code for customer line item report) report in ECC side and Debtor ageing report in BI side.
The problem is
1) there are mismatch of data with some customer amounts in both ECC and Bi side.
2) and also there are customer Nos with amounts in BI Debtor ageing report which are not there in the ECC FBL5N(t-code for customer line item report)
for the second problem, I checked in the Tables BSID,BSAD in ECC side ,there also these customer Nos are not available.
One more strange thing is that with the same selectionin report on both ECC and BI reports the data mismatch and The extra customers in Bi reports are changing everyday, i.e. we are getting new set of data mismatch and extra customers Nos in BI Side.
If anyone have worked on this type of issue.....kindly help...
Thanks in advance

Hi,
on the one hand it may be delta mechanism of FI_*_4 extractors with the timestamps issue, that your comparision between BI and ECC is at no time up to date.
FI Extraction
on the other hand, it may be the delta problem between data targets in your BI-System, in case you load the FI-Data from a DSO to a cube and make a report on the cube. I have this problem at the moment and will watch this thread for more suggestions.

Using COMPRESSION any Problem in Production ?

Hi All,
we are woking in SD application in BI7.0.
We plan to use the compression in SD application area for the Sales Cube (VBAK and VBAP), Delivery Cube(LIKP and LIPS ),Billing Cube (VBRK and VBRP ) and Shipping Cube ( VTTK and VTTS).
The infoproviders are used in the infoset.The below mentioned scenario occurs in the data loads of the infoproviders because of which decided to use the COMPRESSION:-
Sales Cube                                                                   Delivery Cube
Sales Doc        Sales Qty                                                Delivery Doc         Del Qty        Sales Doc
1                        11                                                        1                            11            1
1                        -10
1                        10
InfoSet ( Before Compression)
Sales Doc        Delivery Doc            Sales Qty            Del Qty
1                        1                            11                        11
1                        1                            -10                       11
1                        1                            10                        11
The report developed on the will show Sales Qty = 11, but Delivery Qty = 33. Which is incorrect.
To avoid the above incorrect data planned to use the COMPRESSION so that the infoset will get the data as mentioned below
Infoset(After Compression):-
Sales Doc        Delivery Doc            Sales Qty            Del Qty
1                        1                            11                        11
The report developed on the compressed infoproviders will show Sales Qty = 11 and Delivery Qty = 11. Which is correct.
Please give your suggestions that using the COMPRESSION do create any problems in the Production or is there any other way ?
Thanks in advance.
LNV

Hi ,
Thankyou for the above reply but as a precaution like to know that what are the scenarios where the COMPRESSION of the infoprovider creates a problem in Production System?
Thanks in advance.
LNV

Data mismatch on OIM database

Hi *,
I import some newly created resource to our live system...It returns an error and import terminated...
Later found that, our OIM database reached its maximum allowed size....
But, now there are data mismatches.....
UD_XXX table is created on OIM database. But, it is not showing in the Form Designer form on OIM Design Console....
Then, I created new form, "UD_YYY" on Form Designer in OIM Design console....But, when I logon to database and see, "UD_YYY" table is not created on OIM DB...But, it is showing on the Design console...
I run the following script to increase the db max limit....
ALTER DATABASE DATAFILE '<path>XELTBS_01.DBF' AUTOEXTEND ON NEXT 50M MAXSIZE 5120M;
Now, How can I synchronize the OIM tables.....???
Is it ok, if I manually delete those tables?? and in what table is this custom table info (i.e. UD_*) is kept?? Is it ok, if i delete these entry manually??
Help....
Regards,
Chaturanga

Hi suren,
Yes. I can do it...But, is it ok to keep these miss match data in OIM??
And also in the log, following error occurs countinuesly...
ERROR [XELLERATE.DATABASE] Class / Method: tcDataBase / write statement sometime encounter problems: ORA-01400: can not insert NULL into ("XLADM". "UPA_RESOURCE". "OBJ_KEY")
java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01400: can not insert NULL into ("XLADM". "UPA_RESOURCE". "OBJ_KEY")
I thought, this is due to the data mismatch problem....
Regards,
Chaturanga

Query developement and se16 access on productive system

Hi,
we are setting up an authorization concept on ERP2004s and our users asking for query development rights and se16 on our productive system. I think queries and se16 should be on the test system due to security reasons. Please post some feedback how do you think about it!? I think queries should be developed on the test system and transported.
Thank you in advance!
Best regards
Frank

Hi Frank,
I dont think that you can give access to writing a quaery in production system.
writing a query also need access to:
Transaction Code: SE16
Authorization object: S_TABU_DIS
Activity: 02 AND 03
Risk: The risk here is that users who have this access, have the ability to maintain table data directly in the production system. This includes transactional, masterfile, security and configuration data.
Hope it is useful.
Please award points if it is useful.
Thanks & Regards,
Santosh

Product system not in LMDB only in SMSY

Hi Solman experts,
I have a question regarding Solman products in LMDB and SMSY.
After updating Solman 7.1 from SP08 to SP10, in Managed Systems Configuration, Assign Product step I get the following errors:
(I am using ABC as SID)
ABC00001~JAVA: part of product system ABC, which is not in LMDB but only in SMSY
ABC~ABAP: part of product system ABC, which is not in LMDB but only in SMSY
In SMSY i see that under ABC there is both ABAP and JAVA whereas under ABC00001 there is only Java (in Products system).
The Diagnosis of Solman for this error is:
Diagnosis
The technical system ABC00001~JAVA is assigned to product system ABC, which was created in transaction SMSY and has not yet been migrated into the Landscape Management Database (LMDB).
The technical system ABC~ABAP is assigned to product system ABC, which was created in transaction SMSY and has not yet been migrated into the Landscape Management Database (LMDB).
System Response
Procedure
If the product system information in transaction SMSY is still required for your system landscape maintenance, migrate it to LMDB. You can do this in the SAP Solution Manager: Configuration work center under System Preparation -> Prepare Landscape Description -> Migrate SMSY Data into LMDB -> Migrate Product Systems. (For more information, refer to the help text in the UI.)
If the product system information in transaction SMSY is no longer required for your system landscape maintenance, delete the product system information in SMSY.
Could anybody who had the same experience share their opinion on this case. This LMDB<>SMSY change is very confusing at this step. Would be more meaningful to execute the optional migrate from SMSY step or delete the product. the second seems a little bit meaningless in this case.
Thanks in advance.
Regards

Hi Shkëlzen,
then that could be the reason why you have some system(s) in SMSY and LMDB.
As far as I understood you need to migrate all your Landscape from SMSY to LMDB by using the step "2.4 migrate smsy to lmdb" as mentioned by Jansi Rani Murugesan at http://scn.sap.com/message/15079962#15079962
It might happen that this transformation creates double system entries in LMDB by adding the 0000x to the SID. But this is only an visual "defect".
Once you have done the conversion from SMSY to LMDB you should get this issue resolved.
The conversion report took me more than 48 hours to complete. This is totally normal. You can execute some database statistics updates and/or check/optimize the profile parameters and hope the conversion runs faster.
Hope this helps,
Niklas

Data visibility problem in PDF file generated from R/3 system

Hi all,
We are converting the output of a Smartform into a PDF format. From this smart from, we receive data in OTF format, after which the required data is converted from OTF format to PDF format. Then PDF data is sent through mail using FM SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1 as an attachment.
For the above mentioned Smartform, we have defined Paragraph & Character font type as 'TIMES' in smart style. But when we receive the PDF file (through mail), some data of appears in other fonts:
1) When PDF file is generated from Development system, the different font types which are used by PDF are Arial and Times-Roman. In this case, we are able to see the PDF output and faced no major problems because both of these fonts are supported by PDF file format.
2) When PDF file is generated from Testing system, the font types which is used by PDF is Arial. In this case, we are able to see the PDF output because this font is supported by PDF file format.
3) When PDF file is generated from Production system, the different font types which are used by PDF are Arial, Times-Roman and PBRS. Here, we are able to see the data which is displayed in Arial font and Times-Roman font. But we are not able to see the data which is displayed in PBRS font because this type of font is not supported by PDF file format. If we copy the distorted text from PDF file and paste it in MS-Word then the required data is clearly visible and that is due to the reason that MS-Word supports PBRS font.
But as per smart style we have used only 'TIMES' font, then why different fonts are appearing in PDF file?
What settings are required to be done to make this data visible?
Any pointer to solve this issue will be really appreciable. Thanks in advance for your help.
Thanks and Regards,
Dheeraj Tolani

Hi,
check the following
http://help.sap.com/bp_biv235/BI_EN/html/bw.htm
business content
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/g-i/how%20to%20co-pa%20extraction%203.0x
https://websmp203.sap-ag.de/co
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/37/5fb13cd0500255e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
(navigate with expand left nodes)
also co-pa
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/53/c1143c26b8bc00e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/fb07ab90-0201-0010-c489-d527d39cc0c6
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1910ab90-0201-0010-eea3-c4ac84080806
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ff61152b-0301-0010-849f-839fec3771f3
FI-CO 'Data Extraction -Line Item Level-FI-CO'
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a7f2f294-0501-0010-11bb-80e0d67c3e4a
FI-GL
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c9/fe943b2bcbd11ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/e1/8e51341a06084de10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
http://www.sapgenie.com/sapfunc/fi.htm
Please reward for the same.

PPDS production order dates mismatch between APO and R3

Hi Friends,
We are facing one problem regarding production order date mish match between R3 and APO systems specific to a product.
The product is planned in PPDS and the order automatically transfer to R3 through online CIF.
PPM has got two operations 0010 and 0020 and activity relationships are like this:
P(0010) - P(0020) Start - Start relation ship
S(0010) - P(0010) End - Start relationship.
In PPDS dates are shown as :
on operation 0010 the start/end dates are shown as 08.15.09 to 08.22.09
on operation 0020 the start/end dates are shown as 08.15.09 to 08.22.09
Overall order start date is 08.15.09
Overall order finish date is 08.22.09
and in R3 dates are shown as:
on operation 0010 the start/end date are shown as 08.15.09 to 08.22.09
on operation 0020 the start/end dates are shown as 08.22.09 to 08.29.09
Overall order start date is 08.15.09
Overall order finish date is 08.29.09
The order is off one week (APO vs R3) with start and finish dates.
if we change DS Board settings to ignore internal relationships manually then the dates are matching exactly in APO and R3.
We want the production order dates to be matched without manual intervention.
Could some one please provide some hints on what is happening here and how to correct it.
Thanks.
Krish

Hi Friends,
Thanks a lot for your valuable replies in this regard.
Actually this problem is in production environment and it took some time to test the problem with the master data modifications
you suggested.
As DB and Siddhrath mentioned, the problem was with routing definition. There is no parallel sequence maintained in the routing but there is start-start relation maintained in APO PPM.
We corrected the routing definition and checked the order dates. Now the dates are matching in R3 and APO.
I am awarding DB and Siddharth each five points in this regard.
Once again thank you all for your time and valuable replies.
-Regards
Krish.

Problem when transporting form from DEV system to PRODUCTION system

Hi Experts,
We are developing forms in ABAP, for example there is a form developed in dev system and this form has JS coding in some UI elements events like initialize, on change and on exit; also has one script object defined as variable. this script object has some functions defined in order to do some common validations and field specific ones too.
The form in DEV work fine, all the functions calling, all the validations and the events are working properly as expected. But there is a problem when we moved the changes done in development system into production system. Specifically the script object has the problem: even though the coding is the same in both systems, in production system we had an script error: "Body.CATALOGPARAMS has no properties", as if the Body.CATALOGPARAMS was never instanciated, or it is not defined...
The code that produces this error is the following:
var itemCount = 0;
itemCount = Body.CATALOGPARAMS.DATA.instanceManager.count;
CATALOGPARAMS is table defined as context table coming from an ABAP FM where is filled and passed into the form.
In order to fix this problem I changed that part for the following
var itemCount = 0;
var catalogTable = null;
catalogTable = xfa.resolveNode("Body.CATALOGPARAMS.DATA");
itemCount = catalogTable.instanceManager.count;
This still works as fine as the other in DEV system. But my question is: will I have the same problem when we transport the changes to production system, you have to know that a transport is not something that you can do every day, so I am taking precautions before the transport. Which of both coding is the best for doing this?
Any observations, comments, questions in order to clarify some points are welcome, so please do it.
In advance, thanks a lot.
Mauricio.-
Edited by: Mauricio Poblete on May 11, 2010 4:20 PM

As always, you are the first one to reply... thanks for that!
before everything, I activated the form, then I added this form to a new transport using se80 transaction: I navigated through the form objects and I added the form to a new transport by second click on the form -> other functions -> write transport entry. is this the correct way to assign a transport package with the entire form (including script objects, layouts, and all you told in the last reply)??
Can you give me a guide on how-to add the specific parts to the same transport for forms?
as always, thanks in advance.
Mauricio.-

Data Mismatch problem in Production system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for