PPDS production order dates mismatch between APO and R3

Hi Friends,
We are facing one problem regarding production order date mish match between R3 and APO systems specific to a product.
The product is planned in PPDS and the order automatically transfer to R3 through online CIF.
PPM has got two operations 0010 and 0020 and activity relationships are like this:
P(0010) - P(0020) Start - Start relation ship
S(0010) - P(0010) End - Start relationship.
In PPDS dates are shown as :
on operation 0010 the start/end dates are shown as 08.15.09 to 08.22.09
on operation 0020 the start/end dates are shown as 08.15.09 to 08.22.09
Overall order start date is 08.15.09
Overall order finish date is 08.22.09
and in R3 dates are shown as:
on operation 0010 the start/end date are shown as 08.15.09 to 08.22.09
on operation 0020 the start/end dates are shown as 08.22.09 to 08.29.09
Overall order start date is 08.15.09
Overall order finish date is 08.29.09
The order is off one week (APO vs R3) with start and finish dates.
if we change DS Board settings to ignore internal relationships manually then the dates are matching exactly in APO and R3.
We want the production order dates to be matched without manual intervention.
Could some one please provide some hints on what is happening here and how to correct it.
Thanks.
Krish

Hi Friends,
Thanks a lot for your valuable replies in this regard.
Actually this problem is in production environment and it took some time to test the problem with the master data modifications
you suggested.
As DB and Siddhrath mentioned, the problem was with routing definition. There is no parallel sequence maintained in the routing but there is start-start relation maintained in APO PPM.
We corrected the routing definition and checked the order dates. Now the dates are matching in R3 and APO.
I am awarding DB and Siddharth each five points in this regard.
Once again thank you all for your time and valuable replies.
-Regards
Krish.

Similar Messages

Data mismatch between 10g and 11g.

Hi
We recently upgraded OBIEE to 11.1.1.6.0 from 10.1.3.4.0. While testing we found data mismatch between 10g and 11g in-case of few reports which are including a front end calculated column with division included in it, say for example ("- Paycheck"."Earnings" / COUNT(DISTINCT "- Pay"."Check Date")) / 25.
The data is matching for the below scenarios.
1) When the column is removed from both 10g and 11g.
2) When the aggregation rule is set to either "Sum or Count" in both 10g and 11g.
It would be very helpful and greatly appreciated if any workaround/pointers to solve this issue is provided.
Thanks

jfedynic wrote:
The 10g and 11.1.0.7 Databases are currently set to AL32UTF8.
In each database there is a VARCHAR2 field used to store data, but not specifically AL32UTF8 data but encrypted data.
Using the 10g Client to connect to either the 10g database or 11g database it works fine.
Using the 11.1.0.7 Client to go against either the 10g or 11g database and it produces the error: ORA-29275: partial multibyte character
What has changed?
Was it considered a Bug in 10g because it allowed this behavior and now 11g is operating correctly?
29275, 00000, "partial multibyte character"
// *Cause: The requested read operation could not complete because a partial
//          multibyte character was found at the end of the input.
// *Action: Ensure that the complete multibyte character is sent from the
//          remote server and retry the operation. Or read the partial
//          multibyte character as RAW.It appears to me a bug got fixed.

SNP planned order availability date difference between APO and ECC

Hi,
I have observed that SNP Planned order availability date is not matching between APO and ECC. Details are as follows.
I ran SNP Optimizer with bucket offset of 0.5. After publishing the optimizer created planned orders to ECC, only start date is matching.
Example:
I am using PDS as a source of supply.
Fixed production activity in SNP PDS is 1 day.
GR processing time: 3 day
After running optimizer planned order is created with dates explained below.
Start date/time: 09.05.2011 00:00:00
End date/time: 12.05.2011 23:59:59
Availability date: 16.05.2011 00:00:00
Because of bucket offset defined as 0.5 optimizer planned order availability is start of next monday.
After publishing this planned order to ECC dates on the planned order is as follows.
Start date: 09.05.2011
End date: 09.05.2011
Availability date: 12.05.2011
I have not maintained any scheduling margin key in ECC. Also if I dont define the GR processing time, planned dates between APO and ECC always match. Can anyone explain the impact of GR time on the availability date.
Regards,
Venkat

Hi Venkadesh,
What's "state stamp"? Do you mean different time zone?
note : 645597 mentioned by Nandha is very helpful:
In standard, CCR will use duedate - "the available date of the output product".
Nandha's words "In SAP APO, if the receipt date of the primary product deviates from the
end date of the last activity of the order, the receipt date
always identifies this as inconsistent. You cannot rectify
inconsistencies of this type by using CCR."
I guess in your PDS or PPM, the output product is not assigned to the End of the last activity. Someone changed it?
Please CIF the PDS or PPM again.
If you really want to apply a note, please use note 815509 as you're using planned order,
and system will use order end date in CCR instead.
GR time is always considered. BR/Tiemin

Data Mismatch between ODS and Infocube

Hi,
I have got data mismatch between from ODS to Infocube. In ODS for one Sender Cost Centre, there is only one Company Code. In Infocube it is showing many.For ODS datasource is 0HR_PT_1. In Updaterules of ODS, Company Code was assigned to Company Code. But in Infocube should I assign CompCode to Comp Code or any other Characteristic as Master Data Attr of. Plz suggest us.
It is very urgent.

post ur BW related querures in BW forum

Data mismatch between TABLE and Std. Extract str. (AFPO & 2LIS_04_P_MATNR)

Hi,
I am getting data mismatch in ECC standard table and ECC standard extract structure. Please help me.
I am using 2LIS_04_P_P_MATNR data source (standard extract structure).
I have following data in ECC Table (AFPO - Order Item).
AUFNR (Order Number) --> 4000460
PGMNG (Total planned quantity) --> 0
PSMNG (ORDER QTY) --> 2000
Extract Structure is showing following data.
AUFNR (Order Number) --> 4000460
PGMNG (Total planned quantity) --> 2000 (It should be zero)
PSMNG (ORDER QTY) --> 2000
I have checked with many other order numbers. The extract structure in RSA3 is showing correct values only if PGMNG is non-zero values. If PGMNG is zero, then it is automatically assigning PSMNG value.
Is this common? I want to display correct values for PGMNG from AFPO Table. Why this mismatch between table data and extract data. I have done all required steps refreshing data (deleting setup tables, filling set up tables etc.).
pls suggest. Poinsts will be assigned to every useful answer.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Avneet,
I have a similar problem where in AFPO shows value 1000 in PSMNG field and 1200 in RSA3 for extractor 2LIS_04_P_MATNR.
I have found that the standard feature of the extractor extracts the data at the time of release of process order. If the process order is changed after the release then the extractor will not picup the chagne.
Ex: AFPO value 1000 ---BI Value 1000
Now released in ECC
AFPO value 1000 ---BI Value 1000
In ECC value changed to 1500 after the release. BI will not pickup the change.
Extractor is pulling the data from MCAFPOV table. You can check the values, there it matches with RSA3 values.
I was just going thru forums for the solution. After i found the solution. I am just updating it.
Hope it helps you.
Thaks
Srikanth

Data mismatch between dashboard and bw report

Hi expert,
Data is mismatchin between dashboard and BW report of .I am using SAP BW connection ,
Dashboard screen shot
BW Query output
What is the issue can you please suggest...

Hi Ganapathy,
Please check the Prompt filter and Variables which you are passing to get the output in Dashboard and BW.
It seems that some filters are missing in dashboard.
Thanks
Arvind Shukla

Data mismatching between BW and R/3

Hi BW Experts,
We uploaded Profit Center Accounting Data (It is a Part of CONTROLLING) on 10-04-2008.
And we run the delta daily, it is running fine....
Yesterday we checked the data for one GL Account in both R/3 and BW Systems, but data is not matching.
There are 4 line items (4 Different Amounts) in R/3 side, but we got only 3 line items (3 Amounts) in BW side.
One amount (line item) was missed.
How can i get the missing value in BW side.
We are not using ODS...
It is very urgent.
PLease can anyone tell me the solution.
Regards
Anjali

You should do the following checks:-
1. RSA3 - Extractor Checker
2. RSA7 - Delta Queue Monitoring - to check what is entering the delta queue
(hopefully these would be ok, if there are not much customisations etc..)
3. PSA - Check if there are any selection conditions stopping data from coming to PSA, If you find all data here perfect, then there has to be some issue with the staging etc.
4. If you are on Bi7.0, switch on the temp. storage and then execute your DTP, so that you can check the processing by record.. also check the DTP filters - which might be stopping some data to be processed.
5. Transformation (transfer rules/update rules) - Check for some routines - start routines, end routines which may stop some data to be processed.
6. Last but not the least, you should also check if there is some aggregation that happens in the cube which stops you from seeing the data distinctly.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Sumit

How to identify the data mismatch between inventory cube and tables?

Hi experts,
i have a scenario like how to identify the data mismatch between 0IC_C03 and tables,and what are the steps to follow for avoiding the data mismatch

Hi
U can use data reconcilation method to check the consistency of data between the r/3 and bw. Plz check the below link
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a0931642-1805-2e10-01ad-a4fbec8461da?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/d08ce5cd-3db7-2c10-ddaf-b13353ad3489
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true
Thanx & Regards,
RaviChandra

Sequencing of Purchase order and Good Issue acc. to Production order date

Hello ,
We are using Direct procurement scenario ,During MRP run we generate a Plan order(which have dates); which converted into Production order later.For these production order material is needed (components). And for procuring components we need to create purchase order.
Assumption :- Each component have same Procurement lead time
Our requirement is Purchase order and GI in Production order should be done sequentially, means Based on Production order date ,FIFO based Purchase orders are created and GI done in Production order. Production order with earlier production date have purchase orders earlier and we do GI in production order accordingly.
Kindly suggest

Hello Dario
Thanks for your reply. Our requirement is to put a check on system that GI for production order should be done FIFO wise
means as MRP generate 3 production order of same material each at different date , we want issance of components to be done on FIFO wise in production order
Regards
Rajeev

Config mismatch between VSM and VPath - CSCum76142 bug

Hi all,
I got the error message "Config mismatch between VSM and VPath" on my Nexus VSM but I could not see any detail regarding this bug ID due to permission issue. Has anyone else got access to see this bug detail and able to share? I need to know if this bug is critical or just cosmetic. Thanks
regards,
Robin

Hi Robin,
This DDTS was Junked. But here's the workaround that is mentioned:
1. Deleting the vservice config (no vservice) & reconfiguring vservice, will get rid of this mismatch issue.
2. Toggling the port-profile should also work.
I see couple of other DDTS as well related to this and i would suggest to ask this question in "Other Data Center Subjects" forum for detailed and quick answer.
CSCtz36835 :Config mismatch on VSM and Vpath after deleting service vlan
Regards,
Kanwal
Note: Please mark answers if they are helpful.

Data mismatch between two clients

Hi,
I have a query on data mismatch between two clients.
For eg assume a functional consultant would have configured intially some 5 custom document types and captured that in a transport request (TR1234) and promoted from one system/client (in my case QG1/821) to another system/client (say QG4/821). Again he would have configured another 3 custom document types and put in a transport request (TR4567) and promoted it. The transport request TR4567 some how did not reach QG4/821. Hence it shows only 5 records in T003 table (document types table) in QG4/821 and 8 records in QG1/821. How do we identify which is the correct transport (in this case TR4567), so that this transport can be promoted to QG4/821, so that both QG1/821 and QG4/821 are in sync.
Similary such a discrepancy exists for custom tables also. I am not able to catch hold of any basis people for inputs on this. Hence pls advise.
Regards
Vimal Kumar

development objects can be compared using, Compare the active versions in both the system. (Use remote comparision)
But this you have to maually check.

Transferring Product Master Data Changes From APO to ECC/R/3

Is it possible to transfer product master data changes in APO to ECC via the CIF? If so, does it require custom coding?

Hi James,
In all the different clients where APO is being used with ECC systems. ECC system is always the main system (system of record) which contains all the master data and data present in ECC supposed to be the reference for APO system for planning purpose.
Generally it is not recommended to transfer master data from APO to ECC but as mentioned earlier by some experts you may have ways to do that.
I would be interested in the business scenario where one needs to transfer master data from APO to ECC.
Thanks,
Anupam
Edited by: Anupam Sengar on Aug 11, 2011 12:31 AM

Data Replication Between Sqlserver and Oracle11g using materialized view.

I have Sqlserver 2005 as my source and oracle11g as my target.I need to populate the target daily with change data from source.
for that we have created a dblink between sqlserver and oracle and replicated that table as a Materialized view in Oracle.
problem we are getting here is Fast refresh option is not available.each day it will pick full data from the source.
is there any way to use Fast refresh in this scenario??
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Balaram.

Pl do not post duplicates - Data Replication Between Sqlserver and Oracle11g using materialized view.

Mismatch between availability and marker

I have run the following command:
/repvfy -detail -fix -pwd password
and am seeing a section called "Mismatch between availabiltiy and marker". What does this mean? I know there is a bug out from Note: 735957 against 10.2.04 and that patch 6951116 is available. I also know this bug is fixed in 10.2.0.5. But I don't know what exactly this section is telling me. Here is the output I am seeing:
6. Mismatches between availability and marker
TARGET_GUID TARGET_NAME TARGET_TYPE MARKER_AVAIL_STATUS MARKER_TIME CURRENT_STATUS START_TIME
9CB8EE19415C3C6B55954BF3346C1106 ssan-Internal Concurrent Manager oracle_apps_icm 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:22
1B21AAEF5AC63DD44FE339B7852EA1EE ssan-Report Server_ssan_devstar2 oracle_apps_reports 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:13
F5EAD749526EC1116A70157771E3D011 ssan-Oracle Workflow Agent Listener oracle_apps_wfalsnr 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:29
CD32714673BC508CDBF85BF191A5A1B7 ssan-Workflow Background Engine oracle_apps_wfbg 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:26
FADA1D6BF4DFD0E8AA1739A6666BA210 SSAN oracle_database 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:40
0BE2ACE2EDC7271744DA1A249E30C9A5 APPS_ssan oracle_listener 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:12
89D241EEEF24821E30AD66741BC3D433 devstar2.rtd-denver.com oracle_listener 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:20
F40BAF501645A5957A498E7A270AEA47 ssan-Apps Listener_ssan_devstar2 oracle_listener 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:28
8 rows selected.

Various provision like Freight, transport etc .
these should go to separate GL accounts. if you give wrong account assignment value will be passed to GRIR. then difference will happen
sunoj

Data streaming between server and client does not complete

Using an ad-hoc app, data streaming between server
and client does not complete as it supposed to be.
The process runs well in solaris 5.8, however under 5.9
we have found the characters stream buffer length limitation
is around 900 to 950 characters (by default we are using 3072
characters).
Example:
- We are transfering HTML file, which will be displayed
in the App client, with buffer=3072, the HTML only displayed / transfered
as xxxxxxxx characters, but with buffer=900 the HTML is displayed properly,
in this case, the only problem that we have is the file transfer will
eventually longer than usual.
- There is another case, where we have to transfer information (data) as stream
to the client. A long data stream will not appear at all in the client.
Any ideas why the change between 5.8 and 5.9 woudl cause problems?
The current app-driver that we are using is compiled using Solaris 5.6,
if possible we would like to have use of a later version, which is compiled using Solaris 5.9, do you think this will probably solve our problem?
Thanks
Paul

Does this have anything to do with Java RMI? or with Java come to think of it?

PPDS production order dates mismatch between APO and R3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for