RE: Workflow binding problem in Production system(urgent)

Hi Experts,
Currently we transported our workflows to production server. When one of the user tested our workflow it failed. On Analysis I could find that the data are not passed from method to task container but method is working fine separately. Even I tried executing t-code 'SWU_OBUF' , but still not working.
Pls let me know of the solution .
Thanks,
Bharath

Check for linkages. Is the binding activated betwwen workflow to task container.
Check whether values appear in task container or not.
Then check for binding between task & method container. Is there any event linked with the task. Is the event linkage is activated.
The problem might be resolved if all the linkages are correct.

Similar Messages

Delta INIT problems in production system

hi!
How do you do, I hope all fine, well, I have a problem in production system, I execute the delta init and the data is in BW the problem is when I want to activate the data, the system give me a processing error, somebody can helpme please?
BR

Hi
Please check with your Basis team to confirm there are enough resources.
Also Check what is max work process time . Tcode RZ11 parameter rdisp/max_wprun_time
Check this thread which mentions a lot of related notes.
Link: [Re: DSO-data activation issue;
Regards
Sanjyot

Proxy generation Problem in Production system

Hi Experts,
I have consumed WSDL file and created Client Proxy in development system.which is working fine
After testing it is Transported to the Quality system and Production system both.
In Quality system Proxy is generated properly and functioning properly.
But in Production system, Proxy is not generated and even in Tcode SE80 it is not displaying.
How to solve this problem?
Please suggest.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Jagesh

Hello Experts,
After Transporting Request to Production systems, all Dictionary objects are also created but Only Proxy is not created(Not appearing in SE80 under the respective package name).
Please help me in this.
Regards
Jagesh

Data Mismatch problem in Production system

Dear Experts,
We have been encountering serious data mismatch problems with our source system since 29th Dec 2010.
We have realized this mismatch only on 11th Jan 2011. So, we have deleted entire data from 29th Dec 2010 onwards to 11th Jan 2011. Then we tried to load delta again as per our Process Chain sequence. Since then, our production system has become very inconsistent. We found that the entire data from 29th Dec 2010 to till date is started giving mismatch.
Our system got damaged in terms of data drastically. If I delete any bad requests from our Cubes & Data Store Objects, the next time when we try to load data, cube & Data Store Objects is showing the deleted request no. is not updated properly. Because of this, our Process chain is daily failing to complete and giving so many technical errors. We are totally confused to restore our data from 29th Dec 2010 to till date.
Can any one please help us to restore our data fully and Process Chain to run successfully...............?
Thanks in Advance,
Suman

Hi Suman,
I understood that you are using 3.x version of BW
such kind of issues occurs if you distrub the delta sequence by deleting the requests without making them red.
you can resolve this two ways......
1) Go to reconstruction tab of the DSO and CUBE, select all the req from 29th Dec 2010 thru 11th Jan 2011 and reconstruct them. once they appear in the request tab. make all the requests to red (set the QM status to RED) one by one and delete them from the CUBE and DSO.
This should set the delta status back to 29th and you will be able to run a repeat delta from then in your next delta.
2) Go to RSRQ and give the SID or the Request ID one by one that it is giving you ( request no. which is not updated properly)
Mke the QM status as RED for all of them.
Since you have already deleted them from the targets, just changing the QM status to RED will be sufficinet.
You have make the QM status to RED inorder to inform the system that the requset is incorrect one and has been deleted.
Once it is set to RED, system will not prompt any req and say "request no.# not updated properly".
i suggest you the second option.
Once you resume the delta load, it should run successfully.....and if you feel some data is still missing from 29th Dec 2010 thru 11th Jan 2011, just run a full repair load the get the data back.
If your Datasource is of LO extraction u may need to fill the setup tables to perform full repair.
Please let me know if the Datasource is of LO extraction. Also let me know once the issue is resolved.
Regards,
Sudheer.
Edited by: Sudheer Kumar Kurra on Jan 22, 2011 7:58 AM
Edited by: Sudheer Kumar Kurra on Jan 22, 2011 8:03 AM

Workflow agent assignment in Production system

Hello Sap Gurus,
Is there a way to maintain harcoded agents(not a general task..but putting in a user's name) on the tasks in the SAP production system without going to Change mode.
I know we can do it for the Workflow templates in Dispaly mode but for the tasks, it wouldn't let us do without being in Change mode.
Any suggestions is appreciated
Thanks

Hi Rachana,
The agent assignment of a task is a PD infotype and therefore the question is do you have the authorisation do maintain in production?
From what you have described, the short answer appears to be no. But a longer answer is that, with sufficient access, you can open a workitem in change mode and forward to a new agent after using the Replace Manually option.
Another option would be to go in throught the diagnosis tolls (SWUD) and use the option test environment. You will see the steps of your workflow at the bottom of the page. If there is a red football shaped object - this is agent assignment - you can click to maintain the assignments.
A better question is why maintain by user ID here as it is a pain to maintain.
Regards
Gareth

Workflow Binding Problem

Hi All,
     I have to customize standard Leave Application workflow WS12300111. for that i have copied this workflow into new Z-workflow. Actually i have to fetch some data from custom infotype before sending this leave to approver.
    Now this WS12300111 is based on Class(CL_PT_REQ_WF_ATTRIBS) not on BO and to fetch custom Infotype data I have created custom BO and written method inside this BO.
The problem i am facing is i need to export a parameter from workflow container to my BO's method container and data type of that element is of Table Type (PTREQ_ITEMS_WF_TAB_FLAT) and in method it is not allowing me to create elements with reference to this Table type (there is no Option to create element using ABAP Dictionary type As it is in Workflow container). If i define my method element using Line type if this PTREQ_ITEMS_WF_TAB_FLAT then it allows me to create that element (B'coz line types are basically structures) But it gives me Datatype mismatch error in Binding from Task to Method...
   So is there any way to achieve this?? or should I create a Z-Class as subtype of standard Class CL_PT_REQ_WF_ATTRIBS and then write a new Method in this subtype Z-class to read custom infotype. Is this the way to achieve the delegation functionality of BO in Class.

Hi michell ongota
    What your are trying to achieve with custom infotype. As far as i concern you can use employeet business object to get all the details. customize this busniess object and write your logic here or you can customize the class which you have mentioned. There is nothing like delegation for class. But i dont know in which method u will write the code. Since the leave request going to apply from portal dont do any customization of this class. Try to use the business object EMPLOYEET. I have done leave request workflows i never done any thing in this class.
Regards
vijay

Using COMPRESSION any Problem in Production ?

Hi All,
we are woking in SD application in BI7.0.
We plan to use the compression in SD application area for the Sales Cube (VBAK and VBAP), Delivery Cube(LIKP and LIPS ),Billing Cube (VBRK and VBRP ) and Shipping Cube ( VTTK and VTTS).
The infoproviders are used in the infoset.The below mentioned scenario occurs in the data loads of the infoproviders because of which decided to use the COMPRESSION:-
Sales Cube                                                                   Delivery Cube
Sales Doc        Sales Qty                                                Delivery Doc         Del Qty        Sales Doc
1                        11                                                        1                            11            1
1                        -10
1                        10
InfoSet ( Before Compression)
Sales Doc        Delivery Doc            Sales Qty            Del Qty
1                        1                            11                        11
1                        1                            -10                       11
1                        1                            10                        11
The report developed on the will show Sales Qty = 11, but Delivery Qty = 33. Which is incorrect.
To avoid the above incorrect data planned to use the COMPRESSION so that the infoset will get the data as mentioned below
Infoset(After Compression):-
Sales Doc        Delivery Doc            Sales Qty            Del Qty
1                        1                            11                        11
The report developed on the compressed infoproviders will show Sales Qty = 11 and Delivery Qty = 11. Which is correct.
Please give your suggestions that using the COMPRESSION do create any problems in the Production or is there any other way ?
Thanks in advance.
LNV

Hi ,
Thankyou for the above reply but as a precaution like to know that what are the scenarios where the COMPRESSION of the infoprovider creates a problem in Production System?
Thanks in advance.
LNV

Output Difference in different Production system. Urgent

Hello All,
In the development system we have screen exit in QM02/QM01 with two block b1 and b2.
This is transported to several production systems.
Now the problem is :
In some systems it is working good. But in few only one block is displayed.
Please help.
Thanks,
Kunal

Check for linkages. Is the binding activated betwwen workflow to task container.
Check whether values appear in task container or not.
Then check for binding between task & method container. Is there any event linked with the task. Is the event linkage is activated.
The problem might be resolved if all the linkages are correct.

Error In Production XI system URGENT

Hi Experts,
Its very URGENT.
I have one problem in Production XI system.
we have one interface which is running fine for india.
In this they are using multi mapping to split the messages according to the company codes and are sending to the same FTP server ie INDIA.
Here in the input file have only INDIA data.( Initially there is no BPM in this interface) .
Now they are sending UK and INDIA data in the same input file.
Now we need to send UK data to UK FTP server and INDIA data to INDIA FTPserver.
For this we have used BPM to route the messages.
NOw in receiver determinaion we have configured two receivers one for UK data and also we have used XPath condition to the UK company codes.
If no records are with the UK data then it has to route to the INDIA FTP server.
For this we have used that if NO receiver found then it has to continue message processing with the INDIA FTP server ( Here at RCVR Detemination we have used 3rd radio button).
Plz help me its URGENT.
Points shouldbe rewarded
regards
sreeni

Continue for the ABOVE message.
Here We got one error, that in the 3rd radio button at RCVR Determination in production system, QA and Integration system also the same business system BSD_XX is coming.
But actually it is as follows.
INT--> it sholud be BSI_XX
Qa--> it sholud be BSQ_XX
Prod--> it sholud be BSP_XX
plz keep posting to clarify this issue.
thanks in advance
regards
sreeni

Problem during import of 121 transport requests to productive system

Hello
We have problem during import of transport requests to productive system. Import of 121 transport requests stopped very soon in phase "N" (in TRBAT I have only one entry and in TRJOB as well).
In sm50 there is an BGD running under user DDIC in client 000 now for 14453 seconds (program SAPLSDB2). This should be import.
In SM37 I can see it as job "RDDGEN0L" with repport"RDDGENBB". Based on some literature it should perform "Converting all structure changes generated by the import and recorded in table TBATG, other than the structure changes to matchcode objects." Very interesting that TBATG has only four entries related to 2 indexes in table "DFKKOPK" , one in table "DFKKREP06" and one" ENQU" for EFKKEXC". (only this last one has not status error)
For fist two indexes I know they are not present as objects "LIMU""INDX" in any transport request beeing imported.
Also on productive system there is no"VOL" and "ZOL"indexes for table "DFKKOPK"(instead they are created on test system ie. not transported from development to test system)
Last command for that process is "CREATE INDEX "DFKKOPK~HKO" ON "DFKKOPK" ("MANDT", "HKONT", "OPBEL") PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 002 TABLESPACE PSA
PTR3 STORAGE (INITIAL 0000000016 K NEXT 0000000016 K MINEXTENTS 0000000001 MAXEXTENTS UNLIMITED PCTINCREAS"
There is enaught space on disk and in tablespaces (it is an oracle/HPux server).
Does anyone knows workaroun to solve production

are you importing these transport requests simultaneously into production?
I would suggest you try doing in smaller groups of 5 or 10 and then see whether you are able to import the requests
Rohit

Problem with Delta IP on 0TCT_DS23 in Production system

Hi all,
I'm encountering a quite tricky problem: I'm currently working on the 0TCT_DS23 Datasource, with the technical content cube.
I can run an init infopackage on our 3 environments, Dev, Quality and production. Same for full packages. But when I try to run a delta IP, it is failing on the production system, with a dump of the extractor.
Looking at ST22, it's saying that there is
a syntax error in program "/BI0/SAPLQI0TCT_DS23 ".
Causes
    Error in the ABAP Application Program
    The current ABAP program "SAPMSSY1" had to be terminated because it has
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
    The following syntax error occurred in program "/BI0/SAPLQI0TCT_DS23 " in
     include "/BI0/LQI0TCT_DS23$02 " in
    line 7:
    "A FUNCTION already exists with the name "/BI0/QI0TCT_DS23"."
    The include has been created and last changed by:
    Created by: "SAP* "
    Last changed by: "******"
When browsing the program, it's really the case, in the include   /BI0/LQI0TCT_DS23UXX, there are 3 includes,
*   THIS FILE IS GENERATED BY THE FUNCTION LIBRARY.             *
*   NEVER CHANGE IT MANUALLY, PLEASE!                           *
INCLUDE /BI0/LQI0TCT_DS23U01.
                    "/BI0/QI0TCT_DS23
INCLUDE /BI0/LQI0TCT_DS23U02.
                    "/BI0/QI0TCT_DS23
INCLUDE /BI0/LQI0TCT_DS23U03.
                    "/BI0/QI0TCT_DS230001
The U01 and U02 are containing the same function, so it's failing.
Do you ever have encountered the same problem, and if yes, how to solve it ? It already tried to reactivate the DS, but no way.
Thanks in advance
Frederic

Hi, Ralf
Thanks ! It worked ! I had to repair the function module. I assigned the points
Edited by: Frédéric GAUTHIER on Jan 29, 2010 11:12 AM

Problem of unit of measurment in production system

Hi Friends,
I'm facing a peculiar problem of unit of measurement like error in all quantity and curreny fields in report output after transporting a query from quality system to production system but this query is generated from multiprovdier. what might be the problem.
Regards,
Srinivas.

Hi Dave,
Thanks for ur reply. but to trace in monitor it is not showing any error message.
My Mail ID is [email protected] Please the send the document
Regards,
bharat

Problem when transporting form from DEV system to PRODUCTION system

Hi Experts,
We are developing forms in ABAP, for example there is a form developed in dev system and this form has JS coding in some UI elements events like initialize, on change and on exit; also has one script object defined as variable. this script object has some functions defined in order to do some common validations and field specific ones too.
The form in DEV work fine, all the functions calling, all the validations and the events are working properly as expected. But there is a problem when we moved the changes done in development system into production system. Specifically the script object has the problem: even though the coding is the same in both systems, in production system we had an script error: "Body.CATALOGPARAMS has no properties", as if the Body.CATALOGPARAMS was never instanciated, or it is not defined...
The code that produces this error is the following:
var itemCount = 0;
itemCount = Body.CATALOGPARAMS.DATA.instanceManager.count;
CATALOGPARAMS is table defined as context table coming from an ABAP FM where is filled and passed into the form.
In order to fix this problem I changed that part for the following
var itemCount = 0;
var catalogTable = null;
catalogTable = xfa.resolveNode("Body.CATALOGPARAMS.DATA");
itemCount = catalogTable.instanceManager.count;
This still works as fine as the other in DEV system. But my question is: will I have the same problem when we transport the changes to production system, you have to know that a transport is not something that you can do every day, so I am taking precautions before the transport. Which of both coding is the best for doing this?
Any observations, comments, questions in order to clarify some points are welcome, so please do it.
In advance, thanks a lot.
Mauricio.-
Edited by: Mauricio Poblete on May 11, 2010 4:20 PM

As always, you are the first one to reply... thanks for that!
before everything, I activated the form, then I added this form to a new transport using se80 transaction: I navigated through the form objects and I added the form to a new transport by second click on the form -> other functions -> write transport entry. is this the correct way to assign a transport package with the entire form (including script objects, layouts, and all you told in the last reply)??
Can you give me a guide on how-to add the specific parts to the same transport for forms?
as always, thanks in advance.
Mauricio.-

Steps to move workflow to production system

Hi,
We have a workflow in our production system.Now we have totally changed the workflow in dev system like total logic and new tasks have been created for the same.Now we are ready to move to production system after testing.So what all things are to be done/checked in production system.One thing we faced while moving to quality was that agent assingment was missing in quality.and we made it 'general' in quality system.will that happen in production also.if yes,what we need to do.
do we need to close our previous workflows before sending new definiton.I really dont know if we change the workflow,will the running workflows run on old version or new version.
Please help me on the steps or checklist that I should follow.

I think you should use this link to transport task attribute
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d00a1cb4-913c-2c10-d991-caf663ab9b16?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Thanks
Arghadip

Very Urgent : Dumps Generated in Production System, reason unknown

We are getting ABAP Dumps every second for some reason on the production system. The error analysis message is as follows :
Error analysis
The data type "MCVBAPB" was reloaded from the database while the program
was running.
However, the system found a version of the type that was newer than
the one required.
Any pointers to the reason for this will be helpful.
Kindly contribute.

Hi Booma,
Probably structure MCVBAPB was changed (either directly or by importing a transport from the QA system). These structures are stored in buffers and users already logged on will work with these buffered structures. After the change/import the system will notice a difference between the structure in the buffer and the actual one and will dump.
Normally this should only happen once for each user currently logged on. Any user logging on after the change should not have this dump.
Regards,
John.

RE: Workflow binding problem in Production system(urgent)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for