DDR3 Memory on NetFPGA (Timing error)

Hi,
I am using NetFPGA 1G-CML Board (Kintex 7 is used as FPGA).
I cloned NetFPGA-1G-CML-live projects from Github(https://github.com/NetFPGA/NetFPGA-1G-CML-live), and tried to add 7 series MIG core to reference_switch_nf1_cml project.
But after PAR running, I got following timing error...
and,
7 constraints not met.
INFO:Timing:2761 - N/A entries in the Constraints List may indicate that the
   constraint is not analyzed due to the following: No paths covered by this
   constraint; Other constraints intersect with this constraint; or This
   constraint was disabled by a Path Tracing Control. Please run the Timespec
   Interaction Report (TSI) via command line (trce tsi) or Timing Analyzer GUI.
Generating Pad Report.
1 signals are not completely routed. See the system.unroutes file for a list of all unrouted signals.
WARNING:Par:100 - Design is not completely routed. There are 1 signals that are not
   completely routed in this design. See the "system.unroutes" file for a list of
   all unrouted signals. Check for other warnings in your PAR report that might
   indicate why these nets are unroutable. These nets can also be evaluated
   in FPGA Editor by selecting "Unrouted Nets" in the List Window.
WARNING:Par:283 - There are 393 loadless signals in this design. This design will cause Bitgen to issue DRC warnings.
Total REAL time to PAR completion: 5 mins 3 secs
Total CPU time to PAR completion: 5 mins 16 secs
Peak Memory Usage: 2612 MB
Placer: Placement generated during map.
Routing: Completed - errors found.
Timing: Completed - 724 errors found.
Number of error messages: 0
Number of warning messages: 400
Number of info messages: 1
Writing design to file system.ncd
PAR done!
ERROR:Xflow - Program par returned error code 30. Aborting flow execution...
Done!
I attached my ucf file and mhs file.
How can I solve this error?
Thanks.

Hi
The net which is failing to route is from MMCM to IDELAYCTRL. The MMCM is placed in X1Y2 clock region and the IDELAYCTRL is placed in X0Y4 clock region hence the router fails. Please insert a BUFG in between MMCM and IDELAYCTRL instances. Adding a snapshot of failing net.
Thanks,
Deepika.

Similar Messages

DDR3 Memory Standards: Blurry Lines

DDR3 Memory Standards: Blurry Lines
Rated speed, JEDEC, XMP, EPP, overclocking, overvolting... and what it all means
Much confusion has dawned upon many new users. Purchasing memory is not as easy as it used to be. Manufacturers have forced belief that their modules run at certain DDR3 standards. However, what they don't tell you is that these standards [1866, 2133] do not exist. You're required to overclock, modify timings, and overvoltage the memory modules that have these manufacturer rated speeds. So when you plug your memory into your computer and boot it up for the first time, do not expect 1600+ speeds the first time around. You'll at least have to enable XMP/EPP and/or manually configure (timing and voltage) settings in the BIOS.
Now this is where things start to get complicated and full of numbers:
JEDEC:
JEDEC is an industry memory standard specification. Manufacturers comply with the JEDEC standard by programming the JEDEC profiles into the SPD chips on the memory. The highest SPD profiles you will find on the market right now are DDR-1333 (some are DDR-1600, but DDR-1333 is the main). This is because the latest Intel CPU platform [Sandy Bridge - P67] doesn't support higher than DDR-1333. This will change in the future, as Ivy Bridge supports DDR-1600 I believe.
EPP (Enhanced Performance Profile):
EPP is NVIDIA's higher-level SPD programming extention. NVIDIA's nForce chipsets can read this SPD extention to provide the much desired "one click overclock." Change a setting and wala, auto-overclocked memory.
XMP (eXtreme Memory Profile):
XMP is Intel's version of EPP that runs on Intel chipsets.
NOTE: EPP and XMP have 2 requirements: your memory MUST have an EPP/XMP profile, and your chipset MUST support XMP/EPP. There are no exceptions to this rule.
The point of all this confusion, and why the manufacturers do it
The most obvious question is why do the manufacturers do all this? Because they want to make more money. The bigger numbers on the sticker means bigger sales.
You would wonder why JEDEC have allowed Intel and NVIDIA to decimate their standard with their "extensions", but nonetheless this is what we're stuck to dealing with.
Example scenarios
Example 1:
You bought a P67 board, 2600k and some DDR-2133 memory. You build the computer to find that the memory isn't running at its manufacturer's rated speed (2133), so you take the first step: enabling XMP (this is an Intel chipset, remember) in the BIOS. However, your memory lacks the XMP profiles in its SPD chip so you can't change the setting. You would then consult the manufacturer's website for the settings to be used.
Example 2:
You visit the manufacturer's website, and consult their specified timings for your memory. I've chosen Corsair's Dominator GT 2133C9 in this case (>link here<). If you go to the tech specs section, you shall notice that the SPD speed is 9-9-9-24, DDR-1333, 1.5V which is a JEDEC standard. Corsair's "tested" speed is 9-10-9-27, DDR-2133, 1.65V* which is not a JEDEC standard, but is programmed with DDR-2133 as an XMP profile.
What this tells us is that these are DDR-1333 modules overclocked to DDR-2133 and programmed with an XMP profile to support that without manual adjustment. The actual speed of the module is DDR-1333, but the manufacturer's rated speed is DDR-2133. Like I said previously, manufacturer's rated speeds require at least entering the BIOS and either; enabling XMP, or manually configuring timings, voltage and speed.
If you bought the Corsair modules and tried to run them on an AMD Phenom II system, you would have to input the timings, voltage and speed manually because AMD chipsets do not support XMP. This is a common misunderstanding among many AMD-related visitors of the forum.
Summarising post and final thoughts
To summarise:
- The JEDEC standard of DDR-1333 is currently the highest support on Intel's Sandy Bridge platform. Therefore, whether your memory has regular SPD profiles for DDR-1600+ or not, it will NEVER be set at those speeds.
- Understanding the difference between JEDEC standards and manufacturer's rated speeds. The best hint would be look at the voltage. *JEDEC standards will always be 1.5V or lower; never 1.65V or higher.
- For your memory to work at its manufacturer's rated speed out the box you must; 1) have an XMP/EPP compatible chipset, and 2) have XMP/EPP profile(s) on the memory.
- AMD users will be unable to take advantage of XMP's convenience since their chipsets do not support it. They will have to set their settings manually.
I hope that this has explained a lot of things to some people, and increased their understanding.
Thanks for reading.
Another question to ask yourself: do you really need more than DDR-1333 to begin with? Find some answers and draw your own conclusion - >> P67 & RAM Performance -or- Why DDR3-1333 RAM is enough -> Save the money! <<

Quote from: Bas on 31-May-11, 23:57:20
@doubleohseven, you may want to read this before making more statements that involve lawyers and such: >>Please read and comply with the Forum Rules.<<
Further more, you are totally on the wrong track.
1. The memory controller is INSIDE the CPU, as such the CPU is the engine of your car.
2. The memory controller is GUARANTEED by Intel (AMD is about the same) to do 1333.
3. Memory is the tire of the car, it needs to be fast enough, but if the engine fails to do that speed the tires will NEVER reach their rated speed.
4. The motherboard is the chassis of the car, it provides mounting points but it doesn't power the car.
5. The harddisk is the trunk of the car, it determines how much load you can carry/store
6. The videocard is the windscreen and wipers of the car, the bigger they are the more details you see in gaming
7. The PSU is the petrol-tank of the car, use a too small one and your machine stops way before reaching your target.
Maybe now you have a clue that you are on the wrong track?
Sadly people don't do their homework before buying stuff, as such they do not know what they are buying and end up frustrated because they think something is wrong.
Ram is just 1 component....there is also more to a car then just a tire.
No, actually I think I am pretty much on the right track. Yes the memory controller on the CPU is 1333. But if you read the OP, you can see that what he describes (and what I found out) is that the chips on our RAM are actually 1033, 1333, and sometimes 1600 chips, overclocked from the factory to the speeds you buy and pay for ("What this tells us is that these are DDR-1333 modules overclocked to DDR-2133 and programmed with an XMP profile to support that without manual adjustment. The actual speed of the module is DDR-1333, but the manufacturer's rated speed is DDR-2133. Like I said previously, manufacturer's rated speeds require at least entering the BIOS and either; enabling XMP, or manually configuring timings, voltage and speed."). Therefore, this can cause instability with the system, I believe if the chips on the RAM were actually at the speeds advertized (1600, 1866, 2133), we would have a much greater chance (of course not 100% guaranteed because of the CPU) of running at those speeds. If the CPU was strictly what is limiting the RAM, wouldn't EVERYBODY on a Sandy Bridge system not be able to get their RAM up to 2133, because I AM seeing plenty people do you. The CPU may be ONE factor, but the RAM not having the chips on board at advertized speeds is another factor.
As for the lawsuit, seriously... I was just venting, it was more of a rhetorical statement, being angry about the RAM issue. If you have a problem with the post, please delete it.

Getting " Not enough memory for the operation error " in BOE

Hi,
We are using BOE 11.0.
we try to schedule a new report with multiple database logins for testing in BOE. When we run the report we are getting error like "Not enough memory for the operation error"
The same report has been executed successfully when we run using Crystal reports developer. The report is fectching less than 10K records from all the databases together.
Please let me know which is causing the issue and also let me know is there any limit in the number of databases connecting for a single report.
many thanks in advance for all your help.
Cheers,
Suri ;-)

Hi Sarthan,
Sorry. I'm new to BOE. We know only scheduling the reports creating folders etc. :-)
I've seen one parameter "Maximum Cache Size Allowed (KBytes)" and the value for this parameter is 5000.
If we change it to a big number whether we can solve the issue ? Please suggest.
Cheers,
Suri ;-)

Re: Does my Satellite L500-19Z support DDR3 memory?

Does my Satellite L500-19Z support DDR3 memory?
I believe it has 4GB (2x2GB 200 Pin 1.8v DDR2 PC2-6400 SoDimm) standard memory (800 MHz I believe). I want to upgrade to 8 GB and have seen the following offer:-
8GB kit (2x4GB) of 1333Mhz PC3-10600 memory.
Will my Laptop support it?
Hope someone can help.
Regards

> Does my Satellite L500-19Z support DDR3 memory?
What does the user manual say?
Did you check this?
The memory support depends on the chipset.
If the chipset does not support the DDR3 then you cannot use this.
The chipset is Mobile Intel GM45 Express Chipset and as far as I know this chipset support the DDR2 800MHz 8GB max memory.

"Not enough memory in target location" error in de...

When I try to download and "save to device" any files from any website of any size, I am receiving the "Not enough memory in target location" error. It's very frustrating . To reproduce I only need to do a "long tap" on the google image on the default google page and select "save image as" and select any location (eg. documents, root (MyDocs), create new folder) and I get the error. Once the error is displayed, most of the time I can't get rid of it and need to do an "End current task" to close the browser.
I have checked the output of a "df -h" and there is PLENTY of space on all volumes, including rootfs (95.1M Free) and /dev/mmcblk0p1 (25.9G Free!).
I've tried flushing the '/home/user/.mozilla/microb' directory and deleting the '/home/user/.browser' file also.
I can transfer files from my PC connected in Mass Storage mode with no problem, I can also create directories and files from X-Term also with no problem.
The only information I can find on this error is related to rootfs being out of space when trying to install an app or update...but this is not my problem.
I have a feeling it could be a permissions issue, anyone have any suggestions?

Hi cpitchford. I have a similar problem. I can't save a bookmarks in the MicroB explorer. The system says "Not enough memory". I read your post and send you the screenshot for the xterm. Thank you for your time. Let me know if you need more informartion about the issue
Attachments:
screenshot03.png ‏93 KB
screenshot04.png ‏98 KB

NI5640R FPGA non-diagram component compilation timing error

I've tried to rebuild the NI5640R example "ni5640R Template" without adding or changing anything.
Got timing error (see below), saying that requirement missed by 0.16ns, because of some non-diagram components: /sDac0Reset, /aDac0Reset_or00001, /aDac0Reset. Xilinx options were set to "use recommended settings".
I've tried this several times, always getting almost the same result. Another example: requirements missed by 0.40ns, because of /sDacSimultReset, /aDac0Reset_or00001, /aDac0Reset. This is still with recommended settings.
Then I tried to compile with design strategy "Timing Performance". 5 out of 6 times compilation failed with timing violation 0.30-0.50ns.
Then I tried to compile with design strategy "Balanced". This time it failed only 2 times out of 6 with timing violation 0.02-0.04ns.
I guess using the "Balanced" strategy works more or less, but maybe there is some better way to address this? I don't even need DAC in my project, so maybe there is a way to exclude it?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

hey thu^^,
I tried this with LabVIEW2013, FPGA module, NI5640R v1.7 drivers, and successfully compiled the example template. I'm attatching my screenshots. Please let me know if there is any difference between my experiment and yours.
Attachments:
XilinxOptions.png ‏15 KB
compilationSummary.png ‏23 KB
finalTiming.png ‏24 KB

Can my macbook 5.2 take ddr3 memory?

Can my macbook 5.2 early 2009 take ddr3 memory? I have upgraded it to 4gb ddr2, but could I upgrade it further to ddr3 8gb? I have read somewhere you can but just to be sure.

Coxy230 wrote:
Can my macbook 5.2 early 2009 take ddr3 memory? I have upgraded it to 4gb ddr2, but could I upgrade it further to ddr3 8gb? I have read somewhere you can but just to be sure.
This is the RAM information for your MacBook
Built-in Memory
None
Maximum Memory
6.0 GB (Actual) 4.0 GB (Apple)
Memory Slots
2 - 200-pin PC2-5300 (667MHz) DDR2 SO-DIMM
Minimum Speed
Interleaving Support
Yes
So basically you can only use DDR2 which you have in it, but it is upgradable to 6GB instead of just the 4 that you have in it

I sent a matrix,its row and column to a child window. However "Acess violation" & 'Memory cannot be reference" error occurs when I try to plot the data in the child dialogue. Why?

My OS is Win200 professional.
I'm running a data acquisition program. I'd got this main dialog which the user selects the input channel.
The child dialog should show the graph.
I'd initialise all the NI_DAQ configuration in the main dialog class. After acquiring the data, I send the matrix to the child window for it to plot. There is no compilation error.
However when I try to plot the data, Windows complained about Acess violation and Memory cannot be accessed error.
I'd attached my program below.
Attachments:
DataAcqDlg.cpp ‏10 KB
Ch1Dlg.cpp ‏7 KB

Wynn:
I believe this problem is occurring because you are using the index operator (brackets "[","]") instead of the functional call operator (parentheses "(",")") in your code to access the matrix.
SigCh1Vect[i] = SigCh1Max[1,i];
The index operator is not defined for the matrix, because the C++ language does not allow a two-argument overload of this operator. Instead you have to use the function call operator for matrices and remember to use the index operator for vectors.
I believe that what is happening is that the compiler is using one of the defined cast operators on the matrix (operator DataType) to convert the symbol "SigCh1Max" into a double pointer. It then interprets the bracket as it would any array index operation. So the compile
r effectively sees:
SigCh1Vect[i] = *(((Real64*)SigCh1Max) + (1,i));
In this case, I believe the comma operator is defined to return the rightmost operand, or "i". Changing your code to
SigCh1Vect[i] = SigCh1Max(1,i);
should fix the problem. Please let me know if any issues exist after this fix.
In the next release of Measurement Studio, I will recommend that the index operator be defined on the matrix classes, even if it simply throws an exception. The existence of this operator will prevent problems like this from showing up.
Hope this helps,
-- Chris W.
Measurement Studio R&D
National Instruments

I am trying to buy more iCloud memory and get an error message

I am trying to buy more iCloud memory and get an error message

What does the error message say?
 Cheers, Tom

'Play Full Screen' looks different than 'play' (makes timing errors)

In iMovie, 'Play Full Screen' behaves differently than 'Play' Makes timing errors, cuts off the beginning of commentaries, etc.

You can't disable tap/zoom scaling. What happens if you add a margin and disable thumbnail?
Can you convert them to a Keynote presentation (Hype?)?
One option would be to reduce the original video dimensions and add a frame/mask around it before adding into a book, that way when it is expanded, it sits at a smaller size. Bunch of work, maybe, so unless you have higher rez video, that may be your best option.

Can I replace the DDR2 Memory in my F730 Laptop with DDR3 Memory?

Can I replace the DDR2 Memory in my F730 Laptop with DDR3 Memory?

Hi,
Unfortunately you can't do this as the modules are physically different.
Regards,
DP-K
****Click the White thumb to say thanks****
****Please mark Accept As Solution if it solves your problem****
****I don't work for HP****
Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience

MSI 6600GT with DDR1 and DDR3 memory?

Hi, im looking to buy the MSI NX6600GT-TD128 (PCIe version).
On MSI Website it says it has DDR3 memory.
But some onlineshops have the card labled with memory type 'SDRAM-DDR', while all other 6600GTs on the same shops are labled 'GDDR3'.
So is there 2 versions of this card, one with DDR1 and one with DDR3?

I'm using Corsair XMS TwinX 1024 LL and I have had no problems so far. However, be warned, there are quite a few people who have horrible luck with Corsair for this processor. That said, check out this link to my post on the subject...Post on Corsair RAM

I'm need upgrade my memory ram but.... Wath diference for 4GB (two 2GB) of 1600MHz DDR3 memory and 1600hz ?

I'm need upgrade my ram 4GB (two 2GB) of 1600MHz DDR3 memory to 16GB (two 8GB) of 1600MHz DDR3 memory but wath diference in 10600hz to 1600hz

There is a big difference between 10600hz and 1600hz
The 2012 Mini needss:
PC3-12800 DDR3
Unbuffered
Non-parity
204-pin module
1600 MHz
The 2011 needs
PC3-10600 DDR3
Unbuffered
Non-parity
204-pin module
1333 MHz
The 2009 and 20010
PC3-8500 DDR3
unbuffered
non-parity
204-pin module
1066 MHz
Slower memory will not work in a Mini that requires higher speed memory.
Sometimes faster memory will not work in a Mini that requires a slower speed.

PNY PC3-12800 DDR3 memory work in iMac 27-inch late 2013?

Will PNY PC3-12800 DDR3 memory work in iMac 27-inch late 2013? I am setting up a new iMac and also wondered if the iMac will read 24 GB memory. Meaning the original 4X2 and an added 8x2 = 24GB. Any advice on these two questions is appreciated.

Welcome to Apple Support Communities
It should work without any problem, always that it meets these specifications > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5908
Your Late 2013 iMac supports up to 32 GB of RAM, so you can use 24 GB of RAM without any issue. Also, you will take advantage of Dual Channel, that improves the RAM performance

Is there any difference between DDR3 memory and LPDDR3 memory? As i brought my macbook air 2013 recently and i saw the specifications it is indicating DDR3, buy apple website stated LPDDR3. Anyone can advise on this?

Hi
Is there any difference between DDR3 memory and LPDDR3 memory? As i brought my macbook air 2013 recently and i saw the specifications in the system info that is indicating DDR3, but apple website stated LPDDR3. Anyone can advise on this?

Welcome to Apple Support Communities
Read > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_DDR DDR is the RAM used in computers, and LPDDR is common in mobile computers

DDR3 Memory on NetFPGA (Timing error)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for