Debit Invoice split, based on split analysis refering to payment reference in header

Hello Experts,
When debit memo request process for billing through SDBILDL due list job, debit invoice split and when I check in silt analysis it is referring to payment reference for split criteria and both the invoice carries same payment terms from predecessor debit memo request.
This is something unusal and I cheked all the split citeria stated below,
same payer / Soldto/ foriegntrade /payment terms/ inco terms/ destination country
Apart from the above criteria is somthing here that i am missing over here.
Please note that in our case we did not encounter any of the split invoice at debit level.
Your inputs is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Satish.

Hello TW thanks for the response. Please see the below screen shot, the combination criteria shows with 0011010 for both the invoices. And debitmemo request created with reference to the original invoice and the same carry to the debit memo invoice as well.

Similar Messages

Invoice split based on Partner function

We have a requirement where we want the invoice to be split based on the partner function. Here are the details.
1. We bill the builder(Partner function PY) by default. Sometimes we want part of the amount to be billed to buyer(Partner function ZA). So if the the sales order has both the partner functions(PY and ZA), I would like the invoice to be split into 2 where one should go to builder(PY) and the other to buyer(ZA).
2. I tried with the split routine given in data transfer for billing documents. The routine is triggered just once(for a sales order) as it is defined at the header level hence I am unable to split the invoice for that order.
Is there any other way to split the invoice?
Thanks in advance
Vamsi

what kind of code have u written to this ? please paste here,
Regards
peram

Billing invoice split based on inbound delivery(VBRK-ZUKRI)

Hello,
We are trying to create an invoice(VF01) through sales order, Invoice should split based on the Inbound delivery number. Routine is triggered based on the sales order item, but there is a possibility of multiple delivery(e.g. 4 to 5) for the one sales order item, since Routine is trigger based on sales item , i am only able to split up based on the sales item
if the 5 inbound delivery in one sales order item, System should create 5 invoices.
Customization done based on the billing document item level.
VTFA (OR to billing type F2) for item category TAS.
Regards,
Jignesh shah

what kind of code have u written to this ? please paste here,
Regards
peram

How to avoid Invoice Split due to billing date, reference number and payment reference?

Hi,
In a scenario of delivery to invoice copying, we are facing issue of invoice split.
After analysing split, came to know that split happened because of different billing date, reference number and payment reference.
In VTFL we kept below fields blank at header level:
Assignment Number
Reference number
In VTFL we kept below setting at item level:
Copying requirements: 001 (this is a del related Pro-forma invoice)
Data VBRK/VBRP: 001 (Inv.split (sample))
Also in VF04, at "default" tab maintained billing date, but still system is splitting invoice.
Split analysis showing below results
Different billing date
Different reference number and
Different payment reference
Pls let me know how to avoind this split. Do we have to copy routine and do changes into it to avoid split.
Regards/Pravin

Hello,
Also in VF04, at "default" tab maintained billing date, but still system is splitting invoice.
Split analysis showing below results
Different billing date
Different reference number and
Different payment reference
this doesn't seem to me standard behaviour (as it regards the billing date). Try the same with VF01: enter manually the billing date, the documents to invoice and press "Billing document overview"; if it keep on splitting according to the billing date, I guess that there's a user-exit during the creation of the invoice, which determines the invoicing date.
Check the following exit:
RV60AFZA
RV60AFZC
RV60AFZZ
Best regards,
Andrea

Undesiarable Delivery split based on customer group

Hi Gurus,
This is very urgent,
One of my business requirement is to avoid splitting of Delivery when the reference sales order contains line items that belong to different customer group.
I have a sales order with three line items. Two of which belong to one customer group and one belong to another customer group. When delivery is created it gets split into two based on the customer group. But I dont want splitting based on customer group.
Is there any SRO settings or enhancement or SAP note etc available for this purpose.
Helpful answers will be rewarded.
Thanks in advance
Ramachandran Babu

This is indeed the routine I was referring to. This ZUKRL field is created for each order and only orders with exactly the same content in this field will be or can be combined into one delivery.
However, I don't see customer group here (only distribution channel and division), so this will not be the cause of your problem.
Regards,
John.

Mapping-based message splits in PI7.0

We have developed an integration scenario on XI 3.0 that uses mapping-based message splits (1:n transformation without BPM). This is available since SP14 I think.
Now we want to upgrade to PI 7.0: Are mapping-based message splits a standard feature of PI 7.0 or do we need a certain SP as well?

Hi,
It should be available with Pi 7.0 with default
And also compare the SP's and do finalization
in 2004 - in 2004s
SP12 & < - SP04
SP13 + 14 - SP05
SP15 - SP06
SP16 - SP07
SP17 - SP08
SP18 - SP09
Xi's Latest SP is SP 21 and PI's is SP 14
Regards
Seshagiri

Document splitting-based on profit center

Hi Experts,
While posting JV (f-02) document, document was not splitting based on profit center.
Dr 520499.......9100 (Profit center 100)
Dr 520475.......7888 ( Profit center 200)
     To. 199000...... ...    16988
When I am trying to post the above entry getting error " Balancing profit center error, profit center is not filled in line item 3"
I hope I done configuration is current.
Please provide the solution on top priority.
Regards,
Mallesh
Moderator: Please, search before posting

Hi,
If you have activated document spliting and done the need ful settings, then entry will be posted in 2 views one is normal etry view and another one is genereal ledger view.
Entry view;
                                          Profit center
vendor                     cr 100
Printing& stationary dr 50     200001
Labour charges       dr 50     200002
GL View
vendor      cr     50      200001
vendor      cr     50      200002
prin & stat   dr 50      200001
Labour charges dr 50 200002
So plz just check your settings related to document spliting and get back.
Regards
T N R

Employee benefit costs are not splitting based on Cost Center/InternalOrder

Good Afternoon!
I'm having an issue with Employee benefit costs that are not splitting based on the cost center/Internal order splits entered on the timesheet. This was discovered while running the cost center report: PC00_MNA_CC_ADM.
For example- this employee has one cost center stored on the Infotype 0001 Organizational Assignment. No other overriding cost distribution set up on IT0027 Cost Distribution. Also, no other setup on OM- HRP1018 Cost Distribution.
Then, on the timesheet, 70 hours of regular time were recorded on the attendance type 2REG and also 10 hours of regular time (also 2 REG) were charged to a different cost center.
Then on the report the Health/Life section are not coming out correctly. On the original cost center from IT0001, the following amounts are shown: ER Dental, Posting Prescription, PPKP Posting, BN Posting Adm Fee, ER cr Flex life, ER cr flex ad&d.
On the other cost center (entered on the timesheet), only ER Dental, ER cr flex life and ER cr flex ad&d are there.
In addition to the the difference in the posting list, the amounts do not calculate out.
If I have 70 hours of regular time to one, and 10 hours of regular time to another, that should calculate out, but my amounts are off.
For example:
Cost Center#1
ER Dental 61.92
Posting prescription 173.62
PPKP Posting 715.50
BN Posting Adm Fee 26.32
ER cr flex life 2.75
ER cr flex ad&d 1.24
Cost Center#2
ER Dental 3.90
ER cr flex life 0.17
ER cr flex ad&d 0.08
If anyone has an idea of where my issue might be I would greatly appreciate any help you can provide. Thank you for taking the time to read my post.

The only good solution I have found is using the New General Ledger: Distribution of liabilities according to expenses. I believe this is only available for users of ECC 6.0 and finance has to be using the new GL funtionality. This will allow you to post the benefits and taxes to the cost centers associated with the earnings.

Timestamp based auto-split

Does anyone know plugin that timestamp based auto-split images into folders?

Plugins can't move photos, so your odds are not good.
I mean, they could be moved on disk, then re-imported in Lightroom (at the new location), but they'd be new photos - edits intact, but edit history missing..
The old versions would then need to be deleted..
I mean #2, a plugin (or app) could use sql to modify a closed catalog, but that'd be the only way to do it "right" (without proper SDK support I mean), and I don't know of any such plugin or app.
I'd love to write such a plugin, and keep hoping for the support to be added to the SDK - fingers crossed..
Rob

Unicode export:Table-splitting and package splitting

Hi SAP experts,
I know there are lot of forums related to this topic, but I have some new questions and hence posting a new thread.
We are in the process of doing unicode conversion in our landscape(CRM 7.0 system based on NW 7.01) and we are running on AIX 6.1 and DB2 9.5. The database size is around 1.5 TB and hence, we want to go in for optimization for export and import in order to reduce the downtime.As a part of the process, we have tried to do table-splitting and parallel export-import to reduce the downtime.
However, we are having some doubts whether this table-splitting has actually worked in our scenario,as the export has exeucted for nearly 28 hours.
The steps followed by us :
1.) Doing the export preparation using SAPINST
2.) Doing table splitting preparation, by creating a table input file having entries in the format <tablename>%<No.of splits>.Also, we have used the latest R3ta file and the dbdb6slib.o(belonging to version 7.20 even though our system is on 7.01) using SAPINST.
3.) Starting with the export using SAPINST.
some observations and questions:
1.) After completion of tablesplitting preparation, there were .WHR files that were generated for each of the tables in DATA directory of export location. However, how many .WHR files should be created and on what basis are they created?
2.) I will take an example of a table PRCD_CLUST(cluster table) in our environment, which we had split. We had 29 *.WHR files that were created for this particular table. The number of splits given for this table was 36 and the table size is around 72 GB.Also, we noticed that the first 28 .WHR files for this table, had lots of records but the last 29th .WHR file, had only 1 record. But we also noticed that, the packages/splits for the 1st 28 splits were created quite fast but the last one,29th one took a long time(serveral hours) to get completed.Also,lots of packages were generated(around 56) of size 1 GB each for this 29th split. Also, there was only one R3load which was running for this 29th split, and was generating packages one by one.
3.) Also,Our question here is that is there any thumb rule for deciding on the number of splits for a table.Also, during the export, are there any things that need to be specified, while giving the inputs when we use table splitting,in the screen?
4.) Also, what exactly is the difference between table-splitting and package-splitting? Are they both effective together?
If you have any questions and or need any clarifications and further inputs, please let me know.
It would be great, if we could get any insights on this whole procedure, as we know a lot of things are taken care by SAPINST itself in the background, but we just want to be certain that we have done the right thing and this is the way it should work.
Regards,
Santosh Bhat

Hi,
First of all please ignore my very first response ... i have accidentally posted a response to some other thread...sorry for that
Now coming you your questions...
> 1.) Can package splitting and table-splitting be used together? If yes or no, what exactly is the procedure to be followed. As I observed that, the packages also have entries of the tables that we decided to split. So, does package splitting or table-splitting override the other, and only one of the two can be effective at a time?
Package splitting and table splitting works together, because both serve a different purpose
My way of doing is ...
When i do package split i choose packageLimit 1000 and also split out the tables (which i selected for table split) into seperate package (one package per table). I do it because that helps me to track those table.
Once the above is done i follow it up with the R3ta and wheresplitter for those tables.
Followed by manual migration monitor to do export/import , as mentioned in the previous reply above you need to ensure you sequenced you package properly ... large tables are exported first , use sections in the package list file , etc
> 2.) If you are well versed with table splitting procedure, could you describe maybe in brief the exact procedure?
Well i would say run R3ta (it will create multiple select queries) followed by wheresplitter (which will just split each of the select into multiple WHR files) ...
Best would go thought some document on table spliting and let me know if you have specific query. Dont miss the role of hints file.
> 3.) Also, I have mentioned about the version of R3ta and library file in my original post. Is this likely to be an issue?Also, is there a thumb rule to decide on the no.of splits for a table.
Rule is use executable of the kernel version supported by your system version. I am not well versed with 7.01 and 7.2 support ... to give you an example i should not use 700 R3ta on 640 system , although it works.
>1.) After completion of tablesplitting preparation, there were .WHR files that were generated for each of the tables in DATA directory of export location. However, how many .WHR files should be created and on what basis are they created?
If you ask for 10 split .... you will get 10 splits or in some case 11 also, the reason might be the field it is using to split the table (the where clause). But not 100% sure about it.
> 2) I will take an example of a table PRCD_CLUST(cluster table) in our environment, which we had split. We had 29 *.WHR files that were created for this particular table. The number of splits given for this table was 36 and the table size is around 72 GB.Also, we noticed that the first 28 .WHR files for this table, had lots of records but the last 29th .WHR file, had only 1 record. But we also noticed that, the packages/splits for the 1st 28 splits were created quite fast but the last one,29th one took a long time(serveral hours) to get completed.Also,lots of packages were generated(around 56) of size 1 GB each for this 29th plit. Also, there was only one R3load which was running for this 29th split, and was generating packages one by one.
Not sure why you got 29 split when you asked for 36, one reason might be the field (key) used for split didn't have more than 28 unique records. I dont know how is PRCD_CLUST split , you need to check the hints file for "key". One example can be suppose my table is split using company code, i have 10 company codes so even if i ask for 20 splits i will get only 10 splits (WHR's).
Yes the 29th file will always have less records, if you open the 29th WHR you will see that it has the "greater than clause". The 1st and the last WHR file has the "less than" and "greater than" clause , kind of a safety which allows you to prepare for the split even before you have downtime has started. This 2 WHR's ensures that no record gets missed, though you might have prepared your WHR files week before the actual migration.
> 3) Also,Our question here is that is there any thumb rule for deciding on the number of splits for a table.Also, during the export, are there any things that need to be specified, while giving the inputs when we use table splitting,in the screen?
Not aware any thumb rule. First iteration you might choose something like 10 for 50 GB , 20 for 100 GB. If any of the tables overshoots the window. They you can give a try by increase or decrease the number of splits for the table. For me couple of times the total export/import time have improved by reducing the splits of some tables (i suppose i was oversplitting those tables).
Regards,
Neel
Edited by: Neelabha Banerjee on Nov 30, 2011 11:12 PM

How is line item split during doc splitting

Hi Everyone,
during doc spitting where is the percentage of split done
eg: 2 line itmes are split (40 /100.........1st line itme) & (60 / 100........2nd line itme)
Regards

Hi,
PLease check the Below informaition. We will not specify the Percentage's. Its taken by system as per our postings. for mor information go throw the below information and Examples.
Information on Document Splitting
    You can use the document splitting procedure to split up line items for
    selected dimensions (such as receivable lines by profit center) or to
    effect a zero balance setting in the document for selected dimensions
    (such as segment). This generates additional clearing lines in the
    document. Using the document splitting procedure is the prerequisite for
    as well as an essential tool for drawing up complete financial
    statements for the selected dimensions at any time.
    You can choose between displaying the document with the generated
    clearing lines either in its original form in the entry view or from the
    perspective of a ledger in the general ledger view.
    For document splitting to be possible, the individual document items and
    the documents must be classified. Each classification corresponds to a
    rule in which it is specified how document splitting is to occur and for
    which line items.
    SAP delivers a set of standard rules that should usually prove
    sufficient. If not, you can define your own set of rules and adapt these
    according to your needs.
    Example
    Example 1: Invoice
    Suppose a vendor invoice containing the following items is entered:
    Posting Key Account     Segment     Amount
    31          Payables                -100
    40          Expense     0001                      40
    40          Expense     0002          60
    Document splitting then creates the following Ledger view:
    Posting Key Account     Segment     Amount
    31          Payables    0001          -40
    31          Payables    0002          -60
    40          Expense     0001          40
    40          Expense     0002          60
    Example 2: Payment
   The payment for the above vendor invoice then contains the following
   items when entered:
   Posting Key Account     Segment     Amount
   50          Bank                    -95
   25          Payables                100
   50          Cash Discount Received -5
   Document splitting then creates the following document in the General
   Ledger view:
   Posting Key Account     Segment     Amount
   50          Bank        0001          -38
   50          Bank        0002          -57
   25          Payables    0001          40
   25          Payables    0002          60
   50          Cash Discount Received 0001        -2
   50          Cash Discount Received 0002        -3
Thanks
Goutam

Invoice list based on sold to party not

Hi all,
As per my client requirement, Sold to party is one only but there will be different bill to party & Payer.
Only one main sold to party is paying all bills generated on behalf of different payer. The reason to make payer is, client wants accountability on payer wise. So sold to party is one & different payer.
Now Ii require to raise a invoice list based on sold to party wise not payer or bill to party wise.
Invoice list getting spillted because of different partner.
How to do that.
Please suggest me as soon as possible.
Thanks
Shobhit

Hi Shobhit
To meet your requirement you need to go with a enhancement then your requirement will be fulfilled. So you need to discuss with your Technical team also regarding this issue
Thanks and Regards
Srinath

Settle credit purchase invoices with debit invoices..how to setup SAP

Sometimes we have to deal with credit invoices of suppliers. When we use F110 to make a payment batch we would to settle this credit invoices with debit invoices.
But it is not working because the credit invoices are always ending in the exception list.
What do we need to do to make it possible to settle credit invoices with debit invoices in a payment batch.

Hi Robert
Ensure that the baseline date and and due date are same for both invoices and credit memos depending upon the payment term configuation. If the due date is same then both will get cleared in one payment batch.
Regards
Kapil

Enhancements on cost center split, profit center split

Hi All,
What is meant by journal entry conversions, enhancements like profit center split, cost center split?
I have an interview on this requirement, Iam not aware of this.
Could you please give a little idea on these?
Thanks,
Kruthi.

You dont have to join them. Keep both profit center and cost centre in the cube. While defining the update rules, derive profit center from cot centre.
In the report , keep profit center and cost centre as free char.
The users can dynamically drill down and view the report for cost centre or profit centre or both.
Another idea is to keep profit centre as a nav attribute in the cube and in that case, you dont have to derive profit centre from cost centre in the update rules.
Ravi Thotahdri

Filter based on another analysis need to run as a seperate query obiee 11g

Hi,
I have a main report which has a filter condition that depends on the another request(Created through Filter based on another analysis).The Filter based on another analysis report query comes as a embedded query along with the main query (making a subquery).As it has a subquery it is taking more time to fetch data.
Is there any possiblity of running the Filter based on another analysis report as a seperate query.
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Soukath

Hi,
Make sure one thing,u have eanble check box and submit sql button in the bottom of Advanced tab then save it and try again it will work.
refer:
http://tipsonobiee.blogspot.com/2009/06/step-by-step-to-bypass-all-caches.html
Thanks
Deva
Edited by: Devarasu on Dec 19, 2011 11:59 AM

Debit Invoice split, based on split analysis refering to payment reference in header

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for