«Define your omniportlet» after upgrading from portal 10.1.4.0 to 10.1.4.2

Hi every body,
I just upgraded my portal from the version 10.1.4.0 to the version 10.1.4.2.
But i have this error on my pages: «Define your omniportlet».
It looks like i lost the definition of the omniportlets.
Does anyone know what is going on?
Thank you

I think your problem is a known issue. As a hint, you would be seeing some of the following:
* Portal is setup with "External SSL with Non-SSL Within Oracle Application Server".
* useScheme and usePort parameters are missing in the OmniPortlet web.xml file.
* Omniportlet test page url does not match what is defined in the Omniportlet definition.
Please check out the following note on the details and how to fix it.
Doc ID: 740483.1
hope that helps..
AMN

Similar Messages

  • SSO and Portal down after upgrade from AS 10.1.2.0.2 to 10.1.2.3

    SSO and Portal is down after upgrade from AS 10.1.2.0.2 to 10.1.2.3. All others are running fine. Any similiar experience and solution?
    Thanks.
    Andy

    cn=XXX information is missing for the SSO Server (orasso) when going to http://servername:7777/pls/orasso/orasso.home. Is that causing the problem? If so, how can I resolve it?
    Thanks.
    Andy

  • Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query

    Hi All,
    There is a Performance issue after Upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 with a select query in a report painter.
    This query is working fine when executed in 4.7 system where as it is running for more time in ECC6.0.
    Select query is on the table COSP.
    SELECT (FIELD_LIST)
            INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE I_COSP PACKAGE SIZE 1000
            FROM  COSP CLIENT SPECIFIED
            WHERE GJAHR IN SELR_GJAHR
              AND KSTAR IN SELR_KSTAR
              AND LEDNR EQ '00'
              AND OBJNR IN SELR_OBJNR
              AND PERBL IN SELR_PERBL
              AND VERSN IN SELR_VERSN
              AND WRTTP IN SELR_WRTTP
              AND MANDT IN MANDTTAB
            GROUP BY (GROUP_LIST).
       LOOP AT I_COSP      .
         COSP                           = I_COSP      .
         PERFORM PCOSP       USING I_COSP-_COUNTER.
         CLEAR: $RWTAB, COSP                          .
         CLEAR CCR1S                         .
       ENDLOOP.
    ENDSELECT.
    I have checked with the table indexes, they were same as in 4.7 system.
    What can be the reson for the difference in execution time. How can this be reduced without adjusting the select query.
    Thanks in advance for the responses.
    Regards,
    Dedeepya.

    Hi,
    ohhhhh....... lots of problems in select query......this is not the way you should write it.
    Some generic comments:
    1. never use SELECT
                       endselect.
       SELECT
      into table
       for all entries in table
      where.
       use perform statment after this selection.
    2. Do not use into corresponding fields. use exact structure type.
    3. use proper sequence of fields in the where condition so that it helps table go according to indexes.
        e.g in your case
              sequence should be
    LEDNR
    OBJNR
    GJAHR
    WRTTP
    VERSN
    KSTAR
    HRKFT
    VRGNG
    VBUND
    PARGB
    BEKNZ
    TWAER
    PERBL
    sequence should be same as defined in table.
    Always keep select query as simple as possible and perform all other calculations etc. afterwords.
    I hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Pranaya

  • Smartview reports do not open in HFM v11.1.2.1 after upgrade from v9.3.1.

    Smartview reports when I attempt to open in HFM v11.1.2.1 (after upgrade from v9.3.1), points me to launch v9.3.1 workspace. Any advise pls... Thanks, Mark

    Mark,
    I still don't fully understand the issue. Smart View is not launched from Workspace -- it is instead run from within one of the Microsoft Office products (Excel, Word, PowerPoint, Outlook). Are you instead asking about Financial Reports? These are run from the Explore menu within Workspace. You can view these as html or PDF.
    A little more confusing is the fact that Smart View can run a Financial Report from within any of the Office products. In any case, when you use Smart View in 11.1.2.1 you could open a connection to the Workspace server (the connection in Smart View is defined in the Smart View options under Advanced > Shared Connections URL). Assuming you have provided a correct URL there, pointing to the 11.1.2.1 workspace server, you should see the available shared connections when you open a new conenction.
    I re-read your e-mail and wonder if you are confusing things a bit. If you log into Workspace, using Internet Explorer, each user has their own preferences as to what page launches by default upon login. I think you are saying that a usr logging into the 11.1.2.1 workspace somehow has a default page leading them back to the 9.x workspace? If so, check their preferences to examine the default document and it's URL. Once logged into Workspace, choose File > Preferences > General, to view the Startup page. You can make any changes here, but this is user-by-user.
    --Chris                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

  • After upgrading from Win 8 to 8.1 my DVD RAM GT80N SATA Drive is no longer working

    After upgrading from Win 8 to 8.1 my  DVD RAM GT80N SATA Drive is no longer recognizing discs. When I first put a disc in the drive runs for a bit and then stops. I've tried updating the driver but it says it has the most current driver. Under manage, it does not show any error codes and it says it is working correctly. I've looked at the regedit and it does not have any of upper and lower filters. I've tried disabling, rebooting, and reenabling. What am I missing? Another issue I've had since upgrading is that my network adapter needs reset several times a day in order to remain connected to wifi.

    Hey hvbnfrgvn,
    Thank you for the information on your HP Pavilion g7-2270us Notebook PC.
    I suggest following the steps in this document for Drive Cannot Read Discs (Windows 8).
    If your CD/DVD Drive Is Not Detected (Windows 8), follow the steps in this document.
    I hope this information helps, please keep me posted on how it goes.
    Best of luck and have a great day!
    I worked on behalf of HP.

  • I have a big problem with Lion and PGP. After upgrading from snow leopard to lion I cannot access my PGP drive which was generated under snow leopard. PGP does not start but gives a notion that lion cannot work with my PGP version. Solution?

    After upgrading from Snow Leopard to Lion I cannot access a PGP drive which was generated under snow leopard. PGP does not start. When I try to start I just receive a message that Lion cannot work with PGP. How can I now access important and confifential informatio which I have stored in PGP (snow leopard). Do I have to move back to snow leopard. If so, how can I do this? 

    If you have this product,
    http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH165159
    you have to go back to Snow Leopard.
    To re-install SL, back up your home directory, format and re-install.

  • ERROR upload: Error in uploadXMLFiles after upgrading from 10.2.0.4

    After upgrading from 10.2.0.1 to 10.2.0.4 on a newly installed Oracle server, I could not use dbconsole any more. It would not display the login page at http://myserver:1158/em. I tried different browser IE, FireFox, and Chrome. It is the same. Then I checked the %ORACLE_HOME/{server_sid}/sysman/log/emagent.trc and found this errors in it:
    2010-02-04 14:11:45 Thread-2552 WARN command: Job Subsystem Timeout set at 600 seconds
    2010-02-04 14:11:45 Thread-2552 WARN upload: Upload manager has no Failure script: disabled
    2010-02-04 14:11:45 Thread-2552 WARN upload: Recovering left over xml files in upload directory
    2010-02-04 14:11:45 Thread-2552 WARN upload: Recovered 0 left over xml files in upload directory
    2010-02-04 14:11:45 Thread-2552 WARN metadata: Metric collectSnapshot does not have any data columns
    2010-02-04 14:11:46 Thread-2552 WARN metadata: Metric Disk_Path does not have any data columns
    2010-02-04 14:11:46 Thread-2552 WARN metadata: Metric osm_diskGroupPolicies does not have any data columns
    2010-02-04 14:11:50 Thread-352 ERROR upload: Error in uploadXMLFiles. Trying again in 60.00 seconds.
    I tried emctl secure, upload, start and stop many times. It is still the same. It is a new server and a new database. Any idea?
    TIA!

    I did not change password. It is not password issue.
    According to Oracle support,
    1) the error "2010-02-04 14:11:50 Thread-352 ERROR upload: Error in uploadXMLFiles. Trying again in 60.00 seconds" can be ignored.
    2) The error: 2010-02-05 02:52:19 Thread-3864 ERROR util.files: nmeufile_remove D:/oracle/product/10.2.0/db_1/orsvp04.OCTAGONRESEARCH.COM_vp/sysman/recv\00000000365.lk: Error in lfidlb. Error = 0 (No error)
    could be because I used "emctl start agent" , which are not allowed command for DBconsole. The correct one is "emctl start dbconsole"
    Thanks for your input!

  • After upgrading from acrobat 9.5 to XI pro my users have complained on slow typing when filling in form that were created in version 9.5?

    After upgrading from acrobat 9.5 to XI pro my users have complained on slow typing when filling in form that were created in version 9.5?
    The issue is they type but there is 2 second delay when it appears in the field.
    Windows 7 64bit

    I see, I misread your reference to Reader 11 to mean you were using Acrobat 11, but it looks like it worked out anyway.
    The base-14 fonts are special in PDF because they are guaranteed to be available even if they are not embedded. If you select a non-base-14 font for use with a form field, the entire font usually gets embedded, since each glyph it contains has to be available for use with the field. This can take up a lot of space if you do this a lot, and the space isn't reduced if you change back to a base-14 font later because the internal reference to it is not removed. This is caused by the bug I mentioned.
    In your case, however, the entire font doesn't get embedded because fonts like it (e.g., large asian fonts with a lot of glyphs, Arial Unicode) would take up too much space if fully embedded. If it did, a 100KB PDF could bloat to 20MB with that one change. Instead, users are expected to have such fonts installed on their system, which is why you were prompted to install the font pack. This despite the fact that the font was not actually used by anything in your document, it was simply the orphaned reference to it that triggered this. This should get fixed in Acrobat eventually so this type of thing doesn't happen again.

  • PDF files won't open after upgrade from 9 to 10 or 11

    After upgrading from Reader 9 to Reader 10, I lost the ability to open PDF files on my Win 7 laptop.  Even the icons became blank white blocks. I reinstalled Reader 9 and it all worked as usual. In trying Reader 11, it happened again.  Any thoughts?

    Thank you for your reply. Allow me to clarify.
    After installing Reader 10 or 11, the icons for PDFs on my desktop changed from the typical PDF icon to a blank white icon like when the extension of a file has been changed or omitted. Double clicking the icon no longer opens the PDF file. Yes, Reader opens but I no longer was able to open any preexisting PDF files using the new version of Reader. I did try changing away from protected mode to no avail.
    I do not have a screen shot as I have downgraded to Reader 9. I have scanned thoroughly for malware and viruses and none have been found.
    Thank you again. I look forward to your further comments.
    Sent from my iPhone.
    Please pardon brevity, misspellings, and autocorrect hijinks.

  • Universal Worklist UWL not working in NW04s SPS9 after upgrade from NW04

    Hello all,
    this is just a hint in case anyone has the same problem with the UWL.
    It happened to me in 2 cases, that in a Portal 7 SPS9 the UWL only showed a blank page after upgrade from NW04. In NW04 the UWL worked.
    The reason for it was something like a corrupt deployment (but there were no according error messages in any log files). The SAP Support told me to redeploy the UWLJWF*.sca according to note 895523, that worked.
    You can check whether the deployment is the reason of a non-working UWL setting the property "Launch Web Dynpro UI" to 'no'. Then the old HTMLB sources (that should work) are used (But it is not recommended to use the old sources anymore)
    Kind regards
    Andreas

    .. just a hint ..

  • After upgrading from it6 to itunes7 my videos doesn´t work

    After upgrading from itunes6 to itunes7 my videos doesn´t work. Theres no error message, no reaction. all the music play like befor, only my vids (quicktime), all!! the vids doesnt work after updating..i hope, that someone could help me..
    Many thanks
    Cross

    hmmmm. let's try checking to see if they will still play in your current version of QuickTime.
    in itunes, right-click on one of the videos that is causing the grief, and select "Show in Windows Explorer".
    right click the icon of the file in the Explorer window that comes up and select "Open With ...", and try to open it with your QuickTime player. does it play there or do you get funny business with that too?

  • Expiration date not displaying after upgrade from 2007 to 2013

    I recently upgraded from MOSS 2007 to 2013.  I have information management set up on a library of InfoPath forms.  For the forms that were created prior to the upgrade, the expiration date is displaying and actually get updated if I modify them. 
    But none of my forms that have been created after the upgrade, are displaying when the expiration date is, which should be one year from modify date.  If I modify the forms created prior to the upgrade, they reflect the new, update date.
    Are these new forms not getting the policy applied to them, and why not?  I am not sure why the older forms are getting updated, but not my new ones.
    Denise E.

    Hi Denise,
    According to your description, my understanding is that the Expiration date column was not displaying values after upgrading from SharePoint 2007 to SharePoint 2013.
    Per my knowledge, we can only use the date column which is added to the library or list or the Declared Recorded date to set the retention policy, so if the Expiration date is used in the retention policy then the Expiration date should be a column in the
    library or list.
    I recommend to check the retention policy in the library and see which column is used in the retention policy as the image below shows:
    After that, go to the Library settings to find this column.
    Could you please provide screenshots of the retention policy and the columns in the Library settings page?
    Best regards.
    Thanks
    Victoria Xia
    TechNet Community Support

  • Sorting issue after upgrade from 9i to 10g

    Dear all,
    It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
    In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
    After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
    Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
    Thanks for your help,
    M.T.

    903714 wrote:
    Dear all,
    It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
    In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
    After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
    Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
    Thanks for your help,
    M.T. This is expected behavior in 10g. Oracle will not order the dataset for you unless and until you explicitly specify it.
    So without using order by clause in 10g, oracle doesn't guarantee that rows will be ordered.
    To go back to old behavior like 9i, you can set a workaround by
    alter session set "_newsort_enabled"=false;
    Also see MOS - Order Of Data Retrieval Differs after upgrading 9i To 10g [ID 456707.1]

  • Getting WWC-50003 after upgrading from 10.1.2 to 10.1.4

    after upgrading from 10.1.2 to 10.1.4, I no longer can create any portlets from "Additional Portlet Builders" such as Calendar, Chart, Hierarchy, etc. When I try to define the portlete, I get WWC-50003 error msg.
    I have opened SR with Oracle and they still haven't solved my problem.
    Hope someone can help with this issue.
    -Steve

    Are you using HTML Page Skins? We were having the same problem in Page Groups that were using HTML Page Skins. We solved the issue by adding #PAGE.STYLE# and #PAGE.BASE# to the <HEAD> area of the HTML Page Skin.
    Good Luck!
    Mark

  • Maxdb give Kernel error after upgrade from 7.3 to 7.5

    Hi, our DBA is running into problems after upgrading from 7.3 to 7.5. When we attempt to start the DB we get this error:
    dbmcli -d sd3 -u XXXXXX,XXXXXX db_online
    ERR
    -24994,ERR_RTE: runtime environment error
    1,Check knldiag! Kernel died before reaching ADMIN state
    The details of the error in knldiag are:
    2008-07-02 14:22:39    19     11554 COMMUNIC UKT8 attached big comseg at  0x700000060000000
    2008-07-02 14:22:39    19     11555 COMMUNIC UKT8 big comseg ends at      0x7000000601803F8
    2008-07-02 14:22:39    16 ERR 20152 RTE      UNIX change owner with chown(knltrace,964,202) failed: Not owner
    2008-07-02 14:22:39    16     11000 vdevsize 'knltrace', 666 failed
    2008-07-02 14:22:39    16 ERR 11202 vdiagini vdevsize of kernel trace file unsuccsessful
    2008-07-02 14:22:39    16 ERR 11599 BTRACE   -
    > Emergency Stack Back Trace <----
    As said, he performed the upgrade and now we can't start the DB, anybody that had the same issue?
    We run on AIX 5.3 and from the unix side, nothing changed. After 7.5 we plan on going to 7.6 but that is in the stars I guess...
    We posted a high message with SAP and since over 10 hours nobody picked the message up... we are getting kind of desperate... Any pointers are appreciated...
    thanks

    Hello Thomas,
    -> If you run the database update using the database update tool, the permissions/ownership will be set correctly for the database software & the permissions/ownership of the database log files will be also changed correctly.
         Please check the upgrade log in the /sapdb/data/wrk
    -> Please check the ownership of the files in the database RUNDIRECTORY.
    For example, if the database owner:group of your database is sdb:sdba, then
    -rw-rw----   1  sdb        sdba  u2026.     knltrace
    -> Please update the thread with the output of the following commands :
               sdbregview -l
               xinstinfo SD3
               id sdb
              ls -l <runditectory>
    < rundirectory is the database parameter value and by default is /sapdb/data/wrk/SD3 >
            more /etc/opt/sdb
    Thank you and best regards, Natalia Khlopina

Maybe you are looking for