Deleting parallel currency not base currency in company code

Hi Guys,
I want to delete parallel currency not base currency in company code. We defined the new currency ZWP and our base currency is ZWD. I am able to delete through SPRO but in CO its saying we cannot change currency code again. Is there a way to go around the problem?
Best regards,
Stitch

Dear:
Check out currency assigned to the co code in OBY6.
Regards

Similar Messages

Can "Reporting currency" be "Base currency" for Entity ?

Hi Experts !!
In my app i m using USD as reporting currency and MXP as local currency.
In Entity dimension parent member base currency should be USD and its children base currency should be MXP.
While i m retrieving the data on those entity members , I can see data on entity children members (MXP as base) but not on Parents,(Which base currency is set as USD)
So , Is it correct to tag parant member's base currency as USD or
or because USD is reporting currency so i can not fix parent members base currency as USD.
Please suggest !
Thank you.

parent member will get the data from the childrens.
For the leaf level members you will do the conversion and aggregate to the parent.
Obviously the parent member will be tagged with the reporting currency.
Base currency means the currency of the loading data.

The tax code entered is not defined in the company code country.

Dear sap guru's
I am facing a problem while doing invoice or while cancelling the invoice or even during Subsequent Credit/Debit
Tax code V0 in procedure is invalid
   Message no. FF704
Diagnosis
   The tax code entered is not defined in the company code country.
System Response
Procedure
   Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
Procedure for System Administration
   If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system
   settings.
   To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
   1. Check whether the required tax procedure has been allocated to the
       company code country. The Procedure field is on the detailed screen.
   2. If you need a new tax code, you can create one yourself.
For this i have checked the assignment of company code and tax code V0 in Tcode (OBCL)
In FTXP the tax code is created in country IN, for the same tax procedure and the tax is a input tax.
please suggest what could be the exact problem
Regards
Sujit

Hi Sujit,
1.Go to FTXP and create tax code V0 for country IN and procedure ZAXINN.
2.In Txn: FV11, For the condition type- XXXX (You will get this in Txn: FTXP, against the tax type, you get the condition type OR in the PO-Item details- Invoice tab, next to field: Tax code, see the Tab-Taxes, click on it and will get the condition type) , maintain the country-IN, Tax code-V0 and the rate.
3.Also things to be checked
1> assign country to company code
2> assign company code to tax code
3> create tax code for country IN
4.Under the following menu path, pls check if you have assigned your tax code to Company Code
IMG>Logistics (General)>Tax on Goods Movement>India>Basic Settings>Determination of Excise Duty>Condition Based Excise Determination>Assign Tax Codes to Company Code
Hope it clears,
Rahul.

PO on vendor not created for a company code

Hi,
When the vendor master is not created for a pur.org., I am getting errror message when I try to create a PO on that vendor/pur.org. combination. But, when the vendor master is not created for a company code, system is allowing me without any error for creating PO on that company code.
I want to set error message for creating PO on a company code for which vendor master is not maintainted. Please let me know the settings required for this.
Thanks.

Hi
Normally it will allow to create PO.
If u r not maintaining the company code settings u can not proceed with the MIRO.
U might have created PO through MK01.... But FI team has to enter the Compnay code related details in XK01
Regards,
Raman
Edited by: Raman S on Mar 13, 2009 11:58 AM

Vendor 27672 has not been created for company code 6200

Hai,
I am trying to post a invoice against a Scheduling agreement.
The scheduling agreement has vendor as 27672 and comapny code as 6200 in the header data when i look into ME33L.
When i trying to post an invoice fo the schedulig agreement using BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE , it is thowing the error "Vendor 27672 has not been created for company code 6200". which i am not able to resolve, as the scheduling agreement is raised against that vendor.
when i tried to post the invoice manually using MIRO, there was a POP-UP saying there " PO vendor is not an invoiceing party. enter the invoicing party." where i was giving 27673 which is the alternate payee for this vendor. It is accepting and i could post the invoice succesfully.
However, the same is not available in the BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE that i am using.
Is there any way that i can enter the Invoicing party as i did it when i was posting it manually or is there any other way that i can resolve the issue.
Thanks,
Upender

Hi
Go to XD01 and enter the same customer code that you have now and enter the required company code and sales org, dist. chnl and division and enter the required details and save.
Regards
Madhu
Edited by: Madhu Naidu on Sep 19, 2011 6:46 AM

Fiscal year change not yet made for company code

1. We have opened new company and enter data from FY 2009. All posting has happened properly, but when we are trying to see report S_ALR_87011963 we are facing following problem.
We have already check everything on SDN and followed, but our problem still exists.
Table T093C is showing as FY 2009 year and also same in OB52, OAAQ is showing 2008 as closed year. We have run AJRW for 2009 and it runs successfully.
error -
Fiscal year change not yet made for company code ABCD
Message no. AB059
Diagnosis
You have not yet carried out a fiscal year change for company code ABCD, although the current system date is in the new fiscal year.
Procedure
Carry out the fiscal year change for company code ABCD.
2. We are running AFAB in any mode we get following error.
Only an unplanned posting run is possible in this fiscal year.
Message no. AA693
Diagnosis
You have already posted in fiscal years that come after 2009. This means that you can only post in the last posting period 012 in fiscal year 2009. Or you can post to a special period, if one is set up. Since you have not posted yet in this fiscal year, you must specify that the depreciation posting run is unplanned.
Procedure
Please check the fiscal year entered. If you are certain you want to post to fiscal year 012, you must start the depreciation posting run in the last posting period (or in the special period). Be sure to indicate that this posting run is unplanned, since it falls outside of the normal posting cycle.

Hi Experts,
I am not making a new post regarding this but I hope you can help me answer.
I am experiencing the same issue as the one posted originally and here are my data.
1. Running the same asset report
2. System is currently in FY 2013
3. OAAQ shows FY 2012
4. SE16N > T03C shows FY2013
I have tried running AJRW again but I am getting the same error in the asset report. I hope someone out there can help.
Thanks,
Josef

The payment method R in country SM is not used in any company code

Hello.
In transaction FBZP I choose "Payment Method/Country overview"
I open SM (San Marino) and I choose "Use in company code" I obtain the message:
The payment method R in country SM is not used in any company code
What have I to do?
Thanks.
Mario
Edited by: Ferruccio Galli on May 7, 2009 10:41 AM
No news for me, please?

Hi ,
Go through below path for confiquration patteren
Path: SPRO  Financial Accounting  Accounts receivable and accounts payable  Business transactions  out going payments  Automatic out going payments  Payment method/ bank  selection for payment program (Transactions code: FBZP)
set up payments method per country for payment transactions
Set up Payment methods for company code for payment transactions
Set up All Company codes for payment transactions:
Set up paying company code for payment transactions:
Bank determination:
Regards
Surya

Vendor if not maintained at the company code level

Hi,
System should not save the PO, if the vendor has not maintained at the company code level. How to achieve this?
Regards,
Sattuj

> System should not save the PO, if the vendor has not maintained at the company code level. How to achieve this?
Vendor Need not to be Maintained at Company Code Level For Creating Purchase Order.
During IR only System will Look whether Vendor is Maintained at Company code Level.
Try the User Exit MM06E010 Field selection for vendor address and Check any Possibility is there.
What you can do is you Can Restrict Users to Use MK01. And give Authorization to Limited Users for XK01.
Regards,
Ashok
Edited by: Ashok Kumar Telikula on Sep 18, 2008 9:05 AM

Derivation Rules Not Working for other company codes

Hi,
I have 5 Company codes and only for one FM was activated. now i want to activate FM for all 5 company codes. for which i have assigned the FM area to all 5 company codes. I have also assigned the derivation strategy to all 5 company codes as well. now when i post a transaction for any other company code derivation rules is not being process hence no commitment item or fund center is derived. however for the original company code for which FM was activated in the first derivation rule are working fine means system is deriving commitment item and fund center. can any one tell me why derivation rules are not working for other company codes? do i have to add Company code in source field of derivation strategy? could this be the reason? because in beginning there was no other company code so we did not included any company code field in the first place.
Regards,

Faizan,
Go to Funds Management Government> Actual and Commitment Update/Integration> Activate/Deactivate Funds Management.
In the screen create an entry for each Company Code and Funds Management Area combination.
Activate the AA Derivtn flag if you want the derivation to be called and the Update flag if you want to update commitments and actuals in FM.
Thanks
Shyam

PO/ Invoice created for supplier does not exist for particular company code

Hi Gurus,
We have a case where PO created w.r.t supplier X does not exist for any company code A. Also Invoice is generated.
As per my analysis:
1. Purchasing organization is assigned to the particular plant and Plant does assigned to company code. This purchasing organization does not assigned to any company code and kind of centrally allowed to any company code based on above link.
2. Supplier X does exist for the purchasing organization. And in Partner function-For PI (Invoice presented) partner function, it is defined for another supplier Y. This Y supplier does exist for company code A and might be the reason, it is allowing creating PO and Invoice.
Please correct me, if I am wrong or If there will be any other reason for the same. Just for your information, there is no Info record exist for this PO as it is created for service without any material number.
Thanks for your response.
Best regards,
Karun Kumar

You can create vendor only with reference to purchase organization and withoout company code.
for this vendor, you can create PO and MIGO and system will allow but when you try to post the invoice system will prompt you to enter different invoice party. if you dont enter different invoice party, system will throw an error message "vendor is not defined in XXXX.
So in your case, your analysis is correct.

Vednor do not exist in the company code still i can create a po for that

Hi ,
I am able to create a PO for a vendor which do not exist in that company code but exist for other company code and i am also able to do G.R. But i dont want to do the same .Can you help me where i can enforce the check either in master data or in config.
Lekhram

Yes Sanjay,
You are very much right it is not the company code but Purchasing org is important while creating a PO to have that validation. Since I am using the same purchasing org but different company codes so i am able to create the PO for either of the company code. But at the time of Invoice verification it will not allow me and will pop up for an invoicing party. Since LIV is always at company code level and not at Purchasing org level. So at that time either we have to change our PO as per the right company code or we have to extend our vendor to that company code or possibility of any other solution can not be ruled out like intra company purchase account etc.
Thanks for the confirmation. But don't you think it should restrict us at very first level if we want rather than prompting at the time of LIV.

Currency error for a new company code.

Dear All,
Recently I have created a new company code using existing company code in ECC6. While copying all the data including the currency was coped and modified as per the requirement. But whenever we are creating a stock transfer posting currency of old company code is populating. I checked all relevant master data involved in this process but unable to find from where the old currency is populating.
Can anyone give me some idea how to fix this error.
Thanks in Advance.

Dear:
Check out currency assigned to the co code in OBY6.
Regards

Why I can not find my CoCd(Company code) when I Assign plant to company cod

Hi All,
In SPRO.
I have defined my company in /Enterprise Structure/Definition/Financial Accounting/Define company.
When I try to Assign plant to company code(/Enterprise Structure/Assignment/Logistics-General/Assign plant to company code). It reports my company code is not existing.
Can someone tell me what's wrong. have I missed sth?
Thanks and regards,
Samson Zhu

Plant will be copied Logistics->general -> Define, delete, copy check plant
after defining and copying then you can assign this plant to company code as you specified.
I think this will solve ur problem.
Regards
Ravi

New company integration - Should or not create a new company code?

Hi Gurus,
my customer is acquiring a new company and the related population will be integrated in our sap payroll system.
The FI team is now asking for the creation of a new company code (the new population should be maintained separated from the old one, with a different PMO and budject) but the HR Department does not want to manage (for several internal reasons) a new company code.
Now the question is: is it absolutely necessary to create a new company code or is it possible to manage this situation in another way (maybe linking the new population to a new personnel area, related to an already existing company code)? And what about the posting?
From the payroll point of view, the new population should be managed exactly as the old population. It is just a question to maintain them separated from the FI point of view.
Do you already faced a problem like this? And which is your feedback?
Thanks and Regards,
Gaetano

Creation of new company code is depending on the legal reason...if you legal department and Finance users decide that this new company is a separate legal entity and Profit & Loss will reported separate, Tax Id number is different from parent company, then all this means that this newly acquired company will need a new company code in SAP. Then comes how they want to do the costing...that may also require them to report all the salary cost to this new company code.
Whether it is a new company code or old company code...you would required to identify these new entity as Personnel area or personnel subarea right?
If the Tax id number is different, then it is best recommended to create a separate enterprise structure and bring the employee under the new CC/PA/PSA.
If the tax id is same, only for costing and PnL , then you can use the existing Enterprise structure and override the costing logic using the Substitute cost center or overriding BAdI in HR-FI posting.
Let me know your feedback

Not able to change Company Code in f-58

I have done a payment with T-code f-58 in Co. Code XXXX.
Now I want to do a payment in Co. Code YYYY with f-58 but I am not able to change Co. Code.
Co Code field is in display mode.
I have searched on SCN but did not get any correct solution.
Plz suggest

Dear nisit shah, Press F3 - then the company code will be in the edit mode and you can change the company code. n.selvakumar.

Deleting parallel currency not base currency in company code

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for