Deliver distribution

Hi,.
Deliver email reciepent list i have added required users but ans started email agent but mails are not going based on username available in the list and once i scheduled this it is not trggering automatically
thanks

Hi,
Is the DC assigned to the Distribution Chain?
Verify the Enterprise Structure in SPRO.
Bye

Similar Messages

No authorization to get CIM client from parameter provider?

Currently we seem to have no authorization to get a CIM client from the SLD.
We are, sofar, unable to resolve this issue.
We are using a customer specific parameter provider for mapping JCO destinations
as described in the document 'Integrating Web Dynpro and SAP NetWeaver Portal: How to use extended features of the SAP Application Integrator'
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b0446f5c-fcb9-2910-e082-88becbe3ddc9
From this portal service we would like to get the registered systems in the SLD.
Our code for doing so is (exception handling omitted):
Context jndiContext = new InitialContext();
SldApplicationServiceInterface sldApplicationService = (SldApplicationServiceInterface) jndiContext.lookup(SldApplicationServiceInterface.KEY);
CIMOMClient cimomClient = sldApplicationService.getCimClient();
See e.g. the document 'Using SLD to Manage JCo Connections'
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/2ce854ed-0701-0010-deb5-ffd61d73fd9f
Since the default SLD Access is protected by code-base security we've added our customer specific parameter provider and the application integrator to the CIM Client generation setting in visual admin.
(see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/3c/8bceb066698341b5696334f57802d4/content.htm)
However, we are now stuck on a message
Failed to create CIM client. Check via 'Visual Administrator' tool if the secure store is operational
com.sap.sldserv.SldApplicationService.readDestinationParameters(SldApplicationService.java:159)
com.sap.sldserv.SldApplicationService.getCimClient(SldApplicationService.java:110)
com.getronics.slg.civbs.CiVisionParameterProvider.getParameter(CiVisionParameterProvider.java:123)
com.sapportals.portal.appintegrator.parameter.CustomerProvider.getParameter(CustomerProvider.java:77)
com.sapportals.portal.appintegrator.parameter.ParameterProviderManager.getParameter(ParameterProviderManager.java:51)
com.sapportals.portal.appintegrator.layer.AbstractIntegrationLayer.getParameter(AbstractIntegrationLayer.java:177)
com.sapportals.portal.appintegrator.layer.AbstractIntegrationLayer.getStringParameter(AbstractIntegrationLayer.java:196)
com.sapportals.portal.appintegrator.layer.TopLayerSwitch.mustRedirectToProducer(TopLayerSwitch.java:88)
com.sapportals.portal.appintegrator.layer.TopLayerSwitch.getNextLayer(TopLayerSwitch.java:64)
com.sapportals.portal.appintegrator.LayerProcessor.getNextLayer(LayerProcessor.java:259)
com.sapportals.portal.appintegrator.LayerProcessor.processActionPass(LayerProcessor.java:167)
com.sapportals.portal.appintegrator.AbstractIntegratorComponent.doActionPass(AbstractIntegratorComponent.java:68)
com.sapportals.portal.appintegrator.AbstractIntegratorComponent.doOnPOMReady(AbstractIntegratorComponent.java:54)
com.sapportals.portal.prt.component.AbstractPortalComponent.handleEvent(AbstractPortalComponent.java:396)
com.sapportals.portal.prt.pom.ComponentNode.handleEvent(ComponentNode.java:252)
com.sapportals.portal.prt.pom.PortalNode.fireEventOnNode(PortalNode.java:368)
com.sapportals.portal.prt.pom.PortalNode.processEventQueue(PortalNode.java:799)
com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.PortalRequestManager.runRequestCycle(PortalRequestManager.java:652)
com.sapportals.portal.prt.connection.ServletConnection.handleRequest(ServletConnection.java:240)
com.sapportals.portal.prt.dispatcher.Dispatcher$doService.run(Dispatcher.java:524)
java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
com.sapportals.portal.prt.dispatcher.Dispatcher.service(Dispatcher.java:407)
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.servlet.InvokerServlet.service(InvokerServlet.java:156)
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:401)
com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:266)
com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:387)
com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:365)
com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer(RequestAnalizer.java:944)
com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle(RequestAnalizer.java:266)
com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:95)
com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:175)
com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:100)
com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:170)
Any help in resolving this issue will be highly appreciated (will rewards points)
tia
Marcel Akkerman.

Hi Gamad,
I am assuming you are using the SAP delivered distribution model with the standard filters.
01) Check the distribution model for the infotype 0006 and sybtype 0001
02) Maintain the address subtype 0001 in the HR record in ECC
03) Check the BP number range and T77s0 table entries.
04) Check the authorizations of the RFC user.
05) Execute PFAL in the insert mode with the evaluation path P-S-O. (for the first time)
I am not sure regarding OSS notes as we have done this SRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0 with out applying any notes few years back. It has to work.
Thankyou,
DV

How does the filter work in BD64

Hi all,
I have configured ALE to distribute material master data from the sedning system to recievung system. Also in bd64 I have created filter for plant in the following manner.
Select modelview -> and expand the tree -> under the message type select -> noo filter option -> create filter group -> in that I have selected plant and in the values I have specified 1000. I saved and came back he message displaye under the message type is Data Filter Active. I went to bd 10 and send a material which is located at plant 1000. IN we02 when I checked the stauts is success with green light and one of the staus record with status 30 has this message Receiver found , Data filtered , No conversion , Version conversion. When I checked the recieving side the data records stll contains the plant value 1000.
What I expected is since I am filetring the Idoc based upon plant value, Idoc shouldn't be tranferred or the plant value must be erased on the recieving side. I still the value for werks is 1000.
I have configured bd64 only on sending side. The recieving side has this message No filters , No conversion , No version change . so should I configure bd64 on recieving side also for filters to be implemented and ths is only one way communication.
So I doubt how the filters work. Can anyone please expalin me how the filter works.
Regards,
Vijay.
Message was edited by: vijay kalava

Hi,
Check this Documentation..
Customer Distribution Model. In an R/3 system, the Customer Distribution Model is a tool that stores information about the flow of messages across various systems. The Customer Distribution Model uses an SAP-delivered Distribution Reference Model as its basis (the Customer Distribution Model can have distribution scenarios other than ones stored in the Distribution Reference Model.) The Customer Distribution Model stores data that dictates which messages (message types) flow to which Logical Systems. Many messages can flow to one Logical System, and one message can flow to several systems. With the use of filter objects and listings (which Ill describe shortly), it is also possible to specify in a model the criteria for filtering information for a specific system. A Customer Distribution Model can be created in an R/3 system with that clients base Logical System as the sender Logical System.
Use transaction BD64 or the following menu path to maintain the model: From the IMG (Implementation Guide), Cross-Application Components -> Distribution (ALE) (*) -> Distribution Customer Model -> Maintain Distribution Customer Model Directly -> Maintain Distribution Customer Model Directly.
The IMG for ALE, Distribution (ALE) (*), can also be directly invoked by using transaction SALE. This transaction is used very frequently in ALE. (Ill discuss the process of creating, maintaining, and distributing a Customer Distribution Model later in this article.)
Filter object type and filter objects. A filter object type is used in the Customer Distribution Model to impose a selection criterion on the message (type) flowing to a Logical System. A filter object type with a value associated with it is called a filter object. For example, BUKRS (Company Code) is a filter object type available for message type DEBMAS (Customer Master). To distribute Customer master data of only Company Code 1001 to a particular Logical System, you would use filter object type BUKRS to create a filter object with value BUKRS = 1001. You can have multiple filter objects with different values for the same message type associated with that LS. While determining the receiver(s) of a particular message based on the Distribution Model, ALE performs object filtering. As with the Customer Distribution Model, filter objects are relevant only to ALE.
Regards
Vijay

No authorization to maintain relationships of category BUR010

Hi All
While doing a HR PFAL from ECC 6 to SRM 5, we get error No authorization to maintain relationships of category BUR010
Also the BP For the user has following errors
Error determining address for employee NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
Employee relationship between BP NNNNNNNNNN and BP(Org) NNNNNNNNNN missing
I do see relationship in ECC, not sure if the BUR010 error is causing the issue
Thanks
Gamad

Hi Gamad,
I am assuming you are using the SAP delivered distribution model with the standard filters.
01) Check the distribution model for the infotype 0006 and sybtype 0001
02) Maintain the address subtype 0001 in the HR record in ECC
03) Check the BP number range and T77s0 table entries.
04) Check the authorizations of the RFC user.
05) Execute PFAL in the insert mode with the evaluation path P-S-O. (for the first time)
I am not sure regarding OSS notes as we have done this SRM 5.0 and ECC 6.0 with out applying any notes few years back. It has to work.
Thankyou,
DV

Two different dates on a same fact table.

I use OBIEE and I got some difficulties with the times dimensions and the function AGO because I used two differents dates for my measure.
My fact table:
Ordered Delivered Amount
1/1/2009 2/1/2009 20000
1/1/2009 3/1/2009 10000
*2/1/2009* 2/1/2009 50000
*2/1/2009* 3/1/2009 50000
1/1/2010 2/1/2010 25000
1/1/2010 3/1/2010 20000
1/1/2010 2/1/2010 20000
1/1/2010 3/1/2010 15000
I have two Times Dimensions (Ordered Times AND Delivered Times) and one fact table.
I want to compare the delivered situation (Amount Qty) for the same ordered day last year
I created a prompt with a date (ex.: Ordered date <=1/1/2010 AND Delivered date >=1/1/2010) and I want to compare one year ago with 1/1/2009 (Ordered Date situation…)
I wish the results below:
Delivered Month/Amount/Previous Amount Year Ago
2/ 45000/ 20000
3/ 35000/ 10000
I got some problem cause I had the 100 000 in my previous year (Ago) and I don’t want it because it was ordered after 1/1/2009 (Previous year). I know that the ago function concerns the Sum of Amount by Delivered Date, Year -1 ...
Does somebody has a solution for this ? Thank you
Edited by: user8898885 on Feb 8, 2010 1:01 PM
Edited by: user8898885 on Feb 8, 2010 1:05 PM
Edited by: user8898885 on Feb 8, 2010 1:05 PM

Ok, i created two facts table.
But now, what's the way to know this distribution (Delivered date) for the period (Ordered date).
Because, i got the sum of the amount by the deliverd date, and the sum for the ordered date AND i can't obtain the comparaison for the same period of ordered date.
Example:
Date Ordered || Date Delivered || Amount
janv 1, 2010 || feb. 25 2010 || 40 000
janv 5, 2011 || mar 23 2011 || 60 000
I want to compare for the ordered date, the delivered distribution
Promp = Janv. 2011
Delivered || This year || Previous year
Feb || 0 || 40 000
March || 60 000 || 0
That's my situation.
i hope than the explication is correct. I think than 1 fact table with 2 time dimension (Alias) is the way to do. But you have parhaps a best practice.

Added another subscriber to existing publication. Snapshot delivered but ket re-initializing if Distribution agent is restarted

Hi,
Here is the situation. We have existing replication with sql 2008 r2 publisher and a subscriber on same edition. The database is quite big so snapshot generally takes about 4 hours or more. There are additional tables on subscriber so a backup / restore
mode of initialization is not suitable.
This replication is working just fine, now there is a need to add a sql 2014 subscriber to this publisher and same tables as in current publication, so we decided to simply add another push subscription for this new sql 2014 subscriber. During the process
the Initial snapshot is generated and applied to new 2014 subscribe, keep in mind we have not made any change to publication to avoid affecting the existing subscriber. So when snapshot is delivered and appeared in replication monitor it started creating primary
keys on subscriber database. We have few big tables where we are not sending clustered and non clustered indexes across so that replication snapshot goes fast (although it is over 4 hours). These indexes and primary keys get created with manual scripts after
snapshot is generated. During this time log reader agent has been actively sending transactions to existing subscriber that is telling me that as soon as distribution agent done with the snapshot it will start sending transactions to new subscriber (which
is quite normal). Now the problem, after snapshot is done I need to run manual scripts to create PK and indexes on new subscriber, to do that I have to stop distribution agent so that indexes and PKs don't get blocked. After I stopped distrib
agent temporarily, the Scripts got completed successfully within 20 minutes and when I re-started distribution agent , to my surprise it started initializing the new subscriber again and sending same snapshot that was already applied. It make me puzzled
what caused the distribution agent to reinitialize although it already delivered snapshot and I have indexes created and ready to go. I tried this process again with more careful approach and gave about one hour after snapshot delivered message received. but
it did the same thing. Only explanation I can think of that publisher database is actively sending transactions when I was applying snapshot and as soon as it is delivered, the distribution agent started delivering transaction, I could see Undistributed
Commands kept on growing high telling me that there are lots of transactions for new subscriber to catch up but without indexes and some missing primary keys it would not even catch up and so I always stop the distrib agent and run my scripts on subscriber
and run into this situation. During all these times the existing subscriber never had any issue.
Do I need to make sure no ort minimal transactions happening on publisher when I initialize the new subscriber.
Or should I create new separate publication on the same publisher and use that.
Any other suggestions are welcome
Thanks!
dba60

Snapshot was set of initialize immediately. No errors in repl_errors table. Distribution agent was using default profile.
Do you think that I should be running missing PK and indexing scripts as part of replication, replication provides an option run scripts before or after snapshot was applied. Also, I am wondering if creating some missing PKs is triggering the snapshot to
be reapplied. Also, Why the primary key for some tables not coming along during snapshot delivery?
Do you think having lots of transactions on publisher database while snapshot being applied would be affecting it too?
Also, is it possible to use a different distributors for each publication from same publisher?
My plan now is to create new publication for same publisher and database, this way I will have more control over changing article properties.
Thanks!
dba60

How can I create a Teststand (1.0.3 or 2.0) distribution without having all of the VIs (6.0.2 or 6.1) in the same directory?

How would I create a Teststand distribution of LabVIEW VIs and maintain the test VI directory structure that I want?
I know that I have to use the application builder to build the custom operator interface, configure it as an ActiveX server, and launch the Teststand engine installation.
The only problem that I have is using the VI packager which puts all of the test code and sequences in a single directory.
This gets quite messy. There are just over 1000 files in the neatly orgainzed directory structure that I have now. (this includes support files, dll's and such)
I have read brief appnotes on configuring the ini file(s) to use
the vi search path that I want, but have not been able to get this to work. Maybe I'm not updating the correct ini? or have to include each subdirectory?
I have currently upgraded from LabVIEW 6.0.2 to 6.1
I am currently using Teststand 1.0.3
I have not upgraded to Teststand 2.0 yet because I have not decided if I want to build at this revision or go through the extra work to mass compile Teststand at LabVIEW 6.1, install the LabVIEW 6i VI Packager Fix, and update the new Teststand LV operator interface with my changes.
At present, I'm not getting the results I want and am quickly running out of time. I have to deliver the project by the 14th of July 2002.
Sorry for the long question and thanks for you help.

Hi,
I dont think the problem is really related to using the VI Packager but more to how the OI interface applications relates to labVIEW File constants.
If you are using the LabVIEW as the ActiveX Server then there should be no problems. But if you are using the Runtime LabVIEW server such as 'TestStandLVRTS' then the file constant would return different paths.
eg for the Default Path you would get 'C:\TestStand\Components\User\RuntimeServers\LabVIEW' instead of 'c:\Program Files\National Instruments\LabVIEW'.
Attacted is an example to show how to change these paths when using your runtime server. Unzip this into your teststand examples folder
Put the INI file in the location of the \user\runtimeservers\labview folder.
Change the labview adapter t
o use TestStandLVRTS.exe. You can run the example sequence from either the OI or seqeditor.
I hope this helps
Regards
Ray Farmer
Regards
Ray Farmer
Attachments:
UsingLVOI.zip ‏20 KB

Free Goods being delivered when shouldn't be!!

Hi All
I have a problem and I need some help. To explain it easier I have outline the scenario below:
Free goods (discount type NA00) has been set up for customer Y, sales org 1000 and distribution chanel 12 though VBN1. It is an exclusive free good so that when item A is purchased they receive item B free. The "Free goods delivery control" has been set to B - Delivery only when main item is fully delivered.
Item A currently does not have stock and stock will not arrive until 30 September while item B already has stock in the warehouse.
Even though we have the setting B indicated for the delivery control, a delivery document can still be created. When creating the delivery an information (green) message indicating "Free goods group not complete" appears prior to creation (VL261) but you can still create the delivery for the free goods item only (item B).
I have tried indicating item A as complete delivery in the sales order but the same happens. Also I am unable to create a delivery group for the item in the sales order so that ones out as well.
Does anyone know a way that we can stop this from happening so that item A and B are ALLWAYS delivered at the same time or item B can only be delivered after item A has been delivered.
Is there a way that we can change the message from an information (green) message to an error (red) message?
The customer does not want to customise their system through ABAP which will be maintained by SAP in later releases. They want to do the least amount of ABAP and stick with configuration where possible.
Cheers
Tammy

Hi,
See as your stock is not available for the item A then give the delivery block to item B.
So that it will be not open for the delivery. This is the one way which you can do it.
Now your stock for item A will available from 30sept but i donu2019t know whether this situation will happen other month also or not.
So other this you can do is change the material availability date of the item B also.
So if you change that setting and make is similar to your item A then also you can solve your problem.
Like giving the pick pack time or loading time to the item B which will increase the material availability date of your item.
But for one time issue you should use delivery block.
And if its occurring every month then change the availability date of your item B.
Regards
Raj.

Effective Permissions to send email to distribution group having "only senders in the following list"

Our environment is a mixed Exchange 2007 and Exchange 2010 server environment, still in transition (after 4 years). Users have Exchange 2007 mailboxes. A recent problem has been reported in a distribution group access model that has been working without
complaint for several years.
[email protected] has member John Doe ([email protected]), Jane Doe ([email protected]), "only senders in the following list" is set to GroupA
[email protected] has member Rob Smith ([email protected]), Diane Smith ([email protected]), "only senders in the following list" is set to GroupB
[email protected] has members GroupA, GroupB, "only senders in the following list" is set to GroupC
When designed, we thought that when [email protected] sends an email to [email protected] it would be resolved to the user members of GroupC and delivered to everyone ([email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]). (While
it seems unlikely, that this model has functioned for several years without experiencing this problem, it is conceivable that until recently [email protected] and [email protected] have with few exceptions always had the same membership. Recent changes in
our organizational model have caused this to have some exceptions, and may be the root cause of this problem.)
What we are experiencing is that users [email protected] and [email protected] receive the original email. Users [email protected], [email protected] do not receive the email. [email protected] receives an email "Undeliverable: test
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
[email protected]
Your message wasn't delivered because of security policies. Microsoft will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator. Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007.
Diagnostic information for administrators
Generating server: mail3.domain.com
[email protected]
#550 5.7.1 RESOLVER.RST.NotAuthorized; not authorized ##
Original message headers:
Received: from MAIL7.domain.com ([::1]) by mail3.domain.com ([::1]) with
mapi; Mon 9 Mar 2015 07:00:30 -500
Content-Type: application/ms-tnef;name="winmail.dat"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
From: Jane Doe <[email protected]>
To: GroupC <[email protected]>
Date: Mon 9 Mar 2015 07:00:29 -500
Subject: test
What is the expected behavior?
Does Exchange resolve the "To" distribution group to member mailboxes for delivery purposes, or does it walk the subordinate child groups and check security at each level?
Is this a configurable behavior that may have recently changed as we have a "new" Exchange Admin poking around?
Might this be related to the mixed Exchange 2007 / 2010 environment?
Is there a way to obtain "effective permissions" for delivery restrictions?
emc2

Hi,
From your description, I would like to verify if you have done some changes for GroupB distribution group. Ensure that "[email protected]" is added to the "accept list" in GroupB's message delivery
restrictions.
What's more, are GroupA GroupB and GroupC Exchange 2010 distribution groups?
Best regards,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Does anyone have documentation regarding the distribution accounting type of APAF?

The AP Accounting Entry Type (distribution accounting type) as delivered by PeopleSoft we are most familiar with is "APA" which stands for Accounts Payable Accrual. We are not able to find any reference or documentation regarding AP Accounting Entry Type "APAF". However, after analyzing the AP payment accounting transactions associated with APAF, we believe that the APAF type only shows up when a credit is deducted from a payment. The AP voucher that has the APAF type is the last voucher that indicates that the entire credit amount has been applied to that particular payments. A credit amount may take several vouchers to be fully applied. Documentation or authoritative information would be helpful.

Apple generally does not publish names and phone numbers of their employees. Take a look at the "Partnership Proposals" area of this web page:
http://www.apple.com/itunes/companies/
Regards.

Email ALV report to a distribution list

Hi all,
I have scheduled an alv report (uses ALV Grid) to run in the background using SM36.I put the spool list to be delivered to a set of people whose addresses are in the distribution list. The mails are being received by the users. But the problem is : There are around 20 columns in the report but only info upto 15 columns are being sent as a PDF. There is no problem with the number of rows being sent. It's only the width of the report has been shortened. Can anyone help me out with this please, it is a urgent requirement.
Satish

Hello,
In general I'd recommend you should always use a full address for your email recipients. Your mail server should handle a fully qualified address even for local delivery, however by using the fully qualified version you protect yourself from any configuration changes on the mail server that would stop local addressing working.
Just my thoughts.
John.
http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net
http://apex-evangelists.com

Send mail to distribution list using UTL_MAIL.SEND

Oracle 10.2.0.4.0
Does UTL_MAIL.SEND support sending mail to a distribution list?. The doc says, the recipient mail-id should be separated by a comma. The distribution list has mail-id separated by a comma. I executed a test case sending a mail to a distribution list, I did not receive any error or exception. I did not receive the test mail as well!!.
Has anyone used the UTL_MAIL.SEND to send mails to a distribution list?.
Thanks

Has anyone used the UTL_MAIL.SEND to send mails to a distribution list?.Oracle RDBMS does not know or care is email address is single recipient or list.
It sends message to name provided.
It is up to MTA to deliver any message it gets.
Are you 100% certain that message got to MTA & was successfully processed by it?

Error in PO Distribution lines. cannot proceed with PO creation.

Hi All,
We have recently upgraded to R12 from 11.5.9 in Test environment. Due to upgrade all the purchasing setup which was there in 11.5.9 is now available in R12.
We are creating a Standard Purchase Order. I have entered the header & line level details. Now i am trying to update the shipment details. In the Shipments -> Distributions, I have updated the Requestor name & Deliver-to Now when i am trying to save the recod below error message is coming ->
ORA-24347: Warning of a NULL column in an aggregate function
FRM-40735: POST-FORMS-COMMIT trigger raised unhandled exception ORA-04098.
I cannot proceed with PO creation. Also, we are not selecting the subinventory. We were not selectingthe subinventory in 11i also.
Please guide.
Thanks in advance.
-Sujay

Thanks for the reply Sandeep.
Well i am thinking of this as a Triggger issue. We will recompile the trigger and will check once again.
Can you guide me if you have any idea on the PATCH details.
Thanks
-Sujay

Challenge on illegal distribution blockage

Hi, everybody.
This post is about a very discussed theme: protecting yor app
from copyright violations.
I have a problem with my client distribution model. It's
about delivering an app that is paid montlhy. The user creates a
username, pay and is allowed to use the app for a month.
The service is based on providing credit informations to a
broad business community. So as users can search private databases
for a month.
I don't want to suggest my client to charge users by each
search. We understand that the better distribution model is already
been practiced for a long time, and change this model is not on our
plans.
Once we're developing an easy-to-download-and-install Adobe
AIR software, the problem is to avoid that users can start sharing
the same username and password, paying just one license for
undetermined ammount of users.
As I said, one of the options is to charge on each search,
what could mean a failure for my client business.
So guys, any suggestions?
Regards,
CaioToOn!

You could implement a subscription service for an AIR
application the same as you would for a web application. I.e. when
the user access your search service, you validate that their
account is up-to-date. Just because AIR is easily downloaded and
installed doesn't change this aspect of the problem, especially
since it sounds like your users must be online to use your service
anyway.
Preventing multiple users from using the same account is also
much the same problem as with a web application in this instance. A
server-side approach might work for this too. If too many requests
are made by the same account from multiple IPs at the same time,
then you have reason to suspect that the terms of your subscription
are being violated.
There are ways to uniquely identify an instance of an AIR
application that could help you control access (e.g. by generating
random token on first use). But if your users typically search from
multiple computers, then it might be inconvenient for them to be
locked down to a single instance. If you chose this route, you
could, of course, allow the subscriber to "authorize" a limited
number of application instances as a way to balance respect for
your license with the convenience of your customers.

Internal email delivery taking very long time (EMAIL WITH attachment sent to large distribution group)

Hi Fellows
I am facing an issue with Exchange 2010 SP3 (14.03.0123.003) environment. Internal email sent with attachment to an all employee or large-member distribution group chokes the queue on Hub Transport and takes from 7 to 15 minutes to deliver. during this
time period users's emails are also delayed because of transport queue. I am trying to diagnose the root cause for this. Your suggessions and insight might be helpful for me to get it over quickly.
2 x HT + CAS (WNLB)
2 x MBX (DAG)
UserBase: 5000+
Regards.
J.A

Hi,
Generally, a message that has a large attachment or many recipients takes longer for a Hub Transport server to process than a small message that's addressed to only one recipient.
In Exchange 2010, after a message is received by the Hub Transport server, the message is added to the Submission queue. Messages move from the Submission queue through the categorizer. When the message is categorized, a recipient's e-mail
address is resolved to an object in Active Directory. This query determines the mailbox associated with that e-mail address and which Mailbox server is hosting that mailbox.
For more information about Internal message Routing, please refer to the following link.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb232193(v=exchg.141).aspx
In addition, Slow network bandwidth will effect email delivery. We can increase the network bandwidth to take a test. Low computer performance will also affect the delivery. If sending internal email without attachment to all employee or
large-member distribution group, will they take the same long time to deliver?
Best Regards.

Deliver distribution

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for