Delivery cost is not equal to actual cost in sales order

I met a strange phenomenon is the sale cost in SO is not equal to the cost in delivery order.
I order 3 PCS material and each cost is 43.87 and the total cost is 131.61.
However when I finished PGI the FI document shows the cost is 131.62. the diff is 0.01
I don't know how the diff comes.
Do you know the reason for the above issue?
Thank you very much for your help.
Yang

have you checked whether there are different pricing conditions?
in Sales order, the price is calculated based on the pricing date in the order, if you then create a new delivery, the price is re-calculated with the delivery date, but the sales order still has the old pricing information.
Check the pricing log of the sales order and invoice (tab "conditions") to see, which pricing condition is used.
Or is it possible that your order uses a foreign currency? SO maybe the exchange rate has changed since creating the order.
Regards
Ralf

Similar Messages

CO-PC Cost components are not assigned when actual cost was posted

Hi Expert,
I estimate material cost by Tcode CK11N, the result is cost components were assigned to plan cost. It's okay. But, I have a problem when posting actual cost.
After actual cost was posted by confirming backflush, I run Tcode KKBC_PKO to check again, but Cost Component field is not assigned to actual cost.
Please tell me the reason.
Regard,

Hi,
Thank for your answer.
I will check Cost component Structure, and ensure that all cost elements were assigned.
Additional, cost components were assigned to PLAN cost, but not assigned to ACTUAL cost.
Do I have to configure something more?
Regard,

Permit not assigned for Actual cost

Hi Dears,
Permit not assigned for actual cost in maint order
Actual cost in maintenance order is 3000
In IPMD, cost1 is assigned with class ACTUAL COST and value 3000 is defined.
In OIPG, Permit class ACTUALCOST is assigned.
Goods issue done to order for value 3000.
Again cost determination executed, but still cost1 is not assinged to the work order.
Am i missing anything ?
Regards,
Alagesan M

Hi
In charac CT04 i maintained one value 3000 and table maintained CSEVPERMIT and IKOSTEN
In class CL01, assigned the charac for 049 class type
In OIPG, permit class is maintained with class
In IPMD, new permit created and assigned class in classification and maintained 3000
Now order created and component assigned the planned value is 3000.
through MIGO goods issue done and found the actual value is 3000.
But still opened the permit found nothing assigned.
For Estimated cost and planned costs it is working good only for actual cost permit is not assigning.
Actual cost we need to anything more other than this ?
Alagesan

CCS Details are not getting updated to COPA in Sales Order Settlement(VA88)

Dear Experts,
Our scenario is MTO with valuated material.
1. Production order is tagged to Sales Order.
2. Production order is settled to Material and variance is getting posted to COPA.
3. At the time of Delivery, COGS Debit (Cost Object- Sales Order), Credit - Inventory.
4. At the time of Billing, Accounting Document is getting generated, COPA document is not getting generated.
5. We are not executing WIP. (as per Business process)
6. Settlement is done thru transaction code VA88. COPA Document is getting generated.
I am facing the following issues in the above MTO process.
1. At time of sales order settlement thru VA88, In COPA, only COGS is getting as updated with one value field i.e. Material Cost. Cost Component data (Material Depreciation, Labor etc..) is not getting updated to COPA.
2. When I settle the Sales Order thru VA88, Billing Quantity is not getting updated to COPA though Quantity field mapping is done properly.
Please help me how to resolve the above issues.
Note: Same Cost Component Structure, we are using for Make to Stock scenario. Cost Component Data is getting updated Properly to COPA (at the time of Billing)
Regards,
vgl
Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:52 AM
Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:54 AM

Hi
1. CCS (Cost Comp Split) wont be updated to COPA if you settle via sale order.. In sale order, COGS cost element is posted.. the same will get settled to COPA as one single value...
In MTS, the CCS gets updated to COPA upon billing because of the "valuation" strategy customization... Billing posts to COPA in that case, COPA gets Sales Qty and it is valuated with CCS to give you the break up.. But, in your case, Billing is not posting to COPA, but to sales order.. hence, there is no qty flow into COPA upon billing.. thats why you dont get CCS for MTO
2. The sales qty should be updated to COPA upon VA88.. For this, make the following settings in your PA transfer structure which is used during VA88
1. Go to KEI1, Select your PA transfer structure...
2. Add an assignment line in it... Check on "Qty Billed/Delivered" in the assignment line
3. In the Tab "Value Field" below "source", assign Qty Field
Now when you settle, it should update qty as well
regards
Ajay M

Freight Conditions not populating on free of charge sales order deliveries

I need some assistance, please. I have searched SCN, but have not been able to find a solution to my problem.
We need to be able to charge freight charges on Free of Charge sales orders and am not able to get the charges to populate in the delivery. We send the product for free, but sometimes need to charge the customer shipping charges.
Below are steps I have completed:
Created custom header condition of ZFRC
Added to sales order pricing procedure as a manual condition
(the charge will be updated from external system)
Created Delivery Pricing procedure containing only my
freight conditions (also manual condition)
VTLA settings for item category KLN (free of charge item):Condition Order requirements – 1 Header
VTFL settings for item category KLN:
Pricing Type – D Copy pricing elements unchanged
Price Source – E Delivery/Order
There are times when the freight charges will be added to the sales order, but I also need to be able to add them directly on the delivery.
When charges are added directly to the sales order, they will flow thru to the invoice without an issue, but when I try to add at the delivery level, they are not populating, which results in $0 invoice.
I am not receiving any kind of error messages when trying to add the charges.
We also have this situation with standard orders, but I am not having any problems with it. I tried to mimic that set up for free of charge orders, but it is not functioning properly.
Any assistance would be much appreciated.
Thanks!

Hi Amitesh,
Yes, the condition type used in the Sales Order is the same, ZFRC and it is also a header condition.
The condition analysis is not available in the invoice because there is no condition in the invoice. Below are screen shots of the analysis from the LINE ITEM of the delivery note (there is not analysis available on the header) and the header details of the conditions from the invoice and the delivery.
Line Item Analysis:
Delivery Header Details:
Invoice Header Details:
Please let me know if you need further information.
Thank you for your assistance!

Not be able to create a sales order if credit insufficient

Hello Gurus
how can I block a sales order (not delivery ) if credibility is not sufficient for a customer (credit block on sales order). Thus it should not be able to create a sales order.
what is a stepwise method here ?
Kind Regards

hi manjoy,
i understood ur query in this way.
you dont want to take sales orders from a cusotmer whose credit history is not good. u dont want to allow the system to create orders for this customer. if my understanding is right , u can block this customer in transaction fd32. there is a field " block customer" in fd 32 transaction. if u check this field system will not allow to create any orders for this customer.
Let me know if i misunderstood ur query

Billing document should not be cancelled after creating return sales order

Hi All,
Billing document should not be cancelled after creating return sales order with reference to billing document. Please suggest configuration settings on the same.
Sudheer.

Hi,
In SAP, when the sub-sequent document is existing , we can not cancel the preceeding document. Therefore if you want to cancel the billing document you need to calcel the documents which are created with reference to that.
Check and confirm.
Regards,
Ravi Duggirala

Liquidity Report not picking up Noted item and Sales orders

Hi Experts,
I created planning levels from source as PSK, yet the liquidity is not picking up these items from sales orders and purchase orders. Also while creating noted items, i have given planning levels in the configurarion and the same is not picking up in the liquidity too
Please advice
Thanks in Advance

Hi Hien,
We have created planning levels separately for MM and SD and we have created under SDF and MMF respectively.
IT is working for group created for direct FI entrly and linked the same with PSK and the same is working fine.
I am new to FSCM. Can you please elaborate FDFD?
Thanks and Regards

PR not created after creating 3rd Party Sales Order

Hi SAP,
We have 3rd Party Sales Order process. The Problem is, PR number is not generate after creating 3rd Party Sales Order.
the problem happen for particular customer only. I already check the credit limit and its okay.
need help,

If the PR is not getting created, please click on the Incompletion log in the SO to check for any missing data.
If it is complete use VKM3 transaction to check if the SO needs a credit release., if needed relase the SO and the PR will get generated.
Check if the material is maintained for purchasing or not.

Cost of producion item not related to actual costs of items isued to prod

I have a scenario where a production order for producing a quantity of one of a specific item has been created and released. The Planned quantity of the unique Item used for production in Components Tab is 10, the Issue method is Manual
In Issue for production screen the quantity recorded is 12, 2 more than the planned
Then the receipt for production has been recorded for 1 item.
Valuation method for all involved items is Moving Average
The system behavior expected by myself was the cost of the produced item was the cost of the component multiplied by 12. However the cost the system calculates is the cost of the component multiplied by 10.
While the Summary of the production order shows Actual Component Cost as multiplied by the Actual Product Cost is just multiplied by 10
Some ideas here?
Julio

Suda,
Many thanks for your answer. I will try to explain the business scenario and why I think the cost should be different . In my explanation the sequence of actions and people performing actions is relevant.
1. Product Engineering clerk determines producing parent item will require 10 components and based of that the BOM is created by Product Engineering clerk with 10.
2. Production planning clerk creates production order based on BOM
3. Production planning clerk releases the order
4. Production clerk (the actual performer) requires 5 components to raw material warehouse (nothing recorded in SAP)
5. Warehouse clerk 1 (at raw material warehouse) gives 5 components to production clerk. Warehouse clerk 1 uses Issue for Production transaction to record 5 components issued to production order
6. Production clerk identifies that for this specific production order 10 components should not be enough so for finishing the order requires 7 components to raw material warehouse (again, nothing recorded in SAP)
7. Warehouse clerk 1 gives 7 components to production clerk. Warehouse clerk 1 uses Issue for Production transaction to record 7 components issued to production order
8. Warehouse clerk 2 (at finish goods warehouse) receives the item produced and uses Receipt from production transaction to record 1 item received
From 4 to 8 actions the interaction is just between production clerk and warehouse clerks. It is not expected warehouse clerks neither production clerk have access to modify production order details. They just record what they do.
At the end of the day the reality is that this specific product just produced costed more because more components were used (think the components can be kilograms of a substance or even pieces that can be with some defects just identified at production). And yes, there is a variance between the original order details and the actual components used. All this is shown at Order Summary Tab.
But if the product is been valued using moving average method why the real components issued to production are not used to calculate the cost of the finished product and rather the "planned" components are been used?
I have tried the option you mention. To modify directly the order but to issues arise from here.
a) Every single time some extra components are required the Production planing clerk has to updated the order?
b) If we do so no variance is reported and no action can be taken to avoid this variance.
Your thoughts?
Julio

PM Order: Plan cost is Zero where as Actual cost is having value

Dear Experts,
I wanted to know why Plan cost is comming zero in the Maintenance order, where as Actual cost is having value.
Please guide me where it is going wroung
Regards

Dear PeteA/Manish,
I have assigned two components, and agaist which Reservation created since i had mentioned Stock item.
Then I have issued material against Reservation, then done TECO and processed for Settlement.
This what i have done, after seeing my settlement i have come to knwo that Plan cost was Zero.
Thanks for your suggestion.

HALB costs are not shown in Itemisation for Make to order

Hi
We are facing a problem in Make to order. When a production order is created with respect a sales order, semifinished costs are not appearing in Itemisation or cost component structure of Production order.
In other cases like make to stock and planning with final assemble costs are appearing.
Please provide us solution for this problem.
Thanks and regards,
Deepa

Hi,
Please check with Costing relevancy ind for Semei material at "General data Tab" in component over view of Production order (co02)
Do u mean to say for same sale order material Number , semi material cost will not be added forPG20 and is added for PG 10 at Prod order.Please confirm
Regads
Pradeep

Employee benefit costs are not splitting based on Cost Center/InternalOrder

Good Afternoon!
I'm having an issue with Employee benefit costs that are not splitting based on the cost center/Internal order splits entered on the timesheet. This was discovered while running the cost center report: PC00_MNA_CC_ADM.
For example- this employee has one cost center stored on the Infotype 0001 Organizational Assignment. No other overriding cost distribution set up on IT0027 Cost Distribution. Also, no other setup on OM- HRP1018 Cost Distribution.
Then, on the timesheet, 70 hours of regular time were recorded on the attendance type 2REG and also 10 hours of regular time (also 2 REG) were charged to a different cost center.
Then on the report the Health/Life section are not coming out correctly. On the original cost center from IT0001, the following amounts are shown: ER Dental, Posting Prescription, PPKP Posting, BN Posting Adm Fee, ER cr Flex life, ER cr flex ad&d.
On the other cost center (entered on the timesheet), only ER Dental, ER cr flex life and ER cr flex ad&d are there.
In addition to the the difference in the posting list, the amounts do not calculate out.
If I have 70 hours of regular time to one, and 10 hours of regular time to another, that should calculate out, but my amounts are off.
For example:
Cost Center#1
ER Dental 61.92
Posting prescription 173.62
PPKP Posting 715.50
BN Posting Adm Fee 26.32
ER cr flex life 2.75
ER cr flex ad&d 1.24
Cost Center#2
ER Dental 3.90
ER cr flex life 0.17
ER cr flex ad&d 0.08
If anyone has an idea of where my issue might be I would greatly appreciate any help you can provide. Thank you for taking the time to read my post.

The only good solution I have found is using the New General Ledger: Distribution of liabilities according to expenses. I believe this is only available for users of ECC 6.0 and finance has to be using the new GL funtionality. This will allow you to post the benefits and taxes to the cost centers associated with the earnings.

Capture cost of procured materials in a third party sales order scenario

Dear Experts,
I'm developing a third party sales order solution to my company following the recommended third party scenario by SAP.
Everything is working fine from creation of sales order, automatic creation of purchase requisition, create purchase order using the purchase requisition ect...
The problem I have is the in the Sales order, the cost of the material is not getting captured correctly. The condition maintained in the sales order is VPRS and it is deriving the material cost from the material master record. Ideally it should be deriving the material cost from the invoiced value or else from the purchase order(which is the actual amount we are spending to buy the items). Deriving the cost from material master depicts an incorrect profit in the sales order.
Can someone please advice me how to derive the cost(to be shown in the sales order under VPRS condition)from the invoice or the purchase requisition and Not from the material master.
I'll be grateful if you can describe in a step by step proceedure.
Thanks in advance

Hi Lakshmipathi
Thanks alot for your response.
As u mentioned, at the point of sales order creation the price does gets picked up from the Material Master.
But during Billing, it does NOT get updated to reflect the purchase order price. If that happens, then its perfect.
I did a complete testing cycle and the material master price remains unchanged throught the process upto billing.
Is there any special parameter that I should maintain in VPRS condition for this to happen?
Anyway thanks again for ur reply, appreciate it alot. Let me know your views on this.
As u advise I'll post it on the sales forum as well.
Regards,
Randika

Display cost center field under item level when creating sales order

Hi dear experts,
during the sales order creation(tcode VA01), is it possible to display the cost center field in the tab account assignment under item level??
currently we are using ECC6,in the tab account assignment, the cost center field was actually already defined in the screen by the system...i used to try to 'activate' the cost center field VBAP-KOSTL in the user exit MV45AFZZ, but the cost center still not shown.
I know that there is a config to the sales doc type can be used to open the cost center at header level, how about item level?
thanks and best rgds
Mu

Hi,
The Cost Center Determination settings is in OVF3 - but there are some cases where the Cost Center must be exceptionally changed.
If the document category for order type in IMG VOV8 is defined to be "I" which belong to order type FD - Deliv.Free of Charge, then the field cost center is active for input during transaction VA01.
Alternatively, you can specify an order reason and assign a cost center to an order reason.
However the standard SAP works only at the header level though, so it would not work if cost center is needed on the line item.
The cost center are assign for such business transactions as :
- Free deliveries
- Returns
- Deliveries of advertising materials
You can also make cost center allocation dependent on the order reason, for example:
Order reason: Damage in transit
Order reason: Free sample
Both the IMG settings are done in transaction OVF3, either with/without the order reason.
regards,
Siddharth.

Delivery cost is not equal to actual cost in sales order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for