CO-PC Cost components are not assigned when actual cost was posted

Hi Expert,
I estimate material cost by Tcode CK11N, the result is cost components were assigned to plan cost. It's okay. But, I have a problem when posting actual cost.
After actual cost was posted by confirming backflush, I run Tcode KKBC_PKO to check again, but Cost Component field is not assigned to actual cost.
Please tell me the reason.
Regard,

Hi,
Thank for your answer.
I will check Cost component Structure, and ensure that all cost elements were assigned.
Additional, cost components were assigned to PLAN cost, but not assigned to ACTUAL cost.
Do I have to configure something more?
Regard,

Similar Messages

  • Permit not assigned for Actual cost

    Hi Dears,
    Permit not assigned for actual cost in maint order
    Actual cost in maintenance order is 3000
    In IPMD, cost1 is assigned with class ACTUAL COST and value 3000 is defined.
    In OIPG,  Permit class ACTUALCOST is assigned.
    Goods issue done to order for value 3000.
    Again cost determination executed, but still cost1 is not assinged to the work order.
    Am i missing anything ?
    Regards,
    Alagesan M

    Hi
    In charac CT04 i maintained one value 3000 and table maintained CSEVPERMIT and IKOSTEN
    In class CL01, assigned the charac for 049 class type
    In OIPG, permit class is maintained with class
    In IPMD, new permit created and assigned class in classification and maintained 3000
    Now order created and component assigned the planned value is 3000.
    through MIGO goods issue done and found the actual value is 3000.
    But still opened the permit found nothing assigned.
    For Estimated cost and planned costs it is working good only for actual cost permit is not assigning.
    Actual cost we need to anything more other than this ?
    Alagesan

  • Cost element  is not assigned to a cost component

    Dear All,
    On trying to run costing for finished good having one BOM component, system create error in costing log as-
    Message no-239-Cost element 954001 is not assigned to a cost component     1
    On seeing details:
    Cost element 954001 is not assigned to a cost component
    Message no. CK239
    Diagnosis
    The system attempted to generate the cost component split for the material, but discovered that no assignment has been made in cost component structure Z2 for cost element 954001 and possibly for origin group .
    System Response
    The cost component split is incomplete. The cost of goods manufactured in the cost component split is therefore less than in the itemization.
    ProcedureGo into Customizing for Product Cost Controlling and carry out the assignment for cost component structure Z2 and chart of accounts AICA.
    where i am missing the required setting.
    please guide
    regards

    Hi,
    Use T.Code OKTZ for the relative cost element has to be assigned to one of the components there in
    the cost component structure. Choose the nature of assignment for eg. raw material, choose the source and give the cost element.  Then choose Assignment and give settlement through Cost center, Order.While coming back activate the cost component structure and save.  Try for the Costing.
    Regards,
    Sadashivan

  • Why am I told that fonts are not available when the file was originally created in Fireworks?

    I get the "Fonts not available" message when I open up a document, i.e. open up a png document in the program/computer/etc. where the program was created in the first place.
    I don't get this. How can the fonts not be available when I'm using the same program that used these fonts originally? Having said that, the appearance doesn't seem to change.

    Are the fonts in question installed on your computer?
    Fonts are not part of a program, fonts are installed on a system. Once installed, a font is available to any program that uses fonts. If you're opening a document that was made in the same program, but on a different system, using fonts you do not have installed, then you will get that message.
    So... Are you opening a document that you created? Are you opening the document on the same system on which the document was created? Have you made any changes to the installed fonts (installed or uninstalled any fonts)?
    What version of Fireworks are you using and what OS are you running it on?

  • POI Information Updates when Costing Changes are not Saved

    Hi All,
    When you go to the costing screen of a party in Oracle HRMS, make changes to the costing string (Cost Allocation Flexfield) and not save them. Then, exit from the costing form and go to the Purchase Order Information (POI) screen and press Ctrl+F11, the POI information updates to the new changes. It was my understanding that in order for the purchase order info to be updated you need to make changes or "touch" the costing screen and save. I have noticed that the purchase order changes after being in the costing screen even without saving anything. Was this intend?
    Thanks,
    Naveen Gagadam

    The Changes on the Assignment reflect because of the changes on the Costing Screen. This is due to the custom.pll implementation. Is there an event name that I can use for the Assignment form such that the changes on the Assignment screen show up only after the changes are SAVED on the Costing Screen. Here's the code that we are using in the Procedure: Event of the custom.pll
    ====================================================================================
    If Event_name = 'WHEN-VALIDATE-RECORD' then
    --     1. Costing checks at Assignment (PERWSEAC). This code copies first 4 segments of costing string
    --               to Default Expense Account on the Assignment screen.The Code will perform this function for
    -- the first Costing record but no other record.
    if name_in('system.current_form') in ('PERWSEAC') then
         Step_identity := 'Costing to Expense Account Population';
                   if name_in ('system.cursor_block') = 'COST' then
    -- Check if current record is the first record in the block
    -- prior to 4/6/05 this code only ran if first costing record. now runs for all and passes
    -- whether first record to package. B Wagner                    
    if name_in('system.cursor_record') = '1' then
              lvc2_first_rec := 'Y';
    else
         lvc2_first_rec := 'N';
    end if;
                        if name_in('COST.SEGMENT1') is not null
                   and name_in('COST.SEGMENT8') is not null
                   and name_in('COST.SEGMENT2') is not null
                   and name_in('COST.SEGMENT3') is not null then
                             lvc2_company_nm     := name_in('COST.SEGMENT1');
                             lvc2_LOB := name_in('COST.SEGMENT8');
                             lvc2_location := name_in('COST.SEGMENT2');
                             lvc2_dept := name_in('COST.SEGMENT3');
                             FND_PROFILE.get('USER_ID',ln_user_id );
         -- It has been assumed that the seperator for the flexfield segments is a period ('.') .
         -- If the seperator is changed then the following line of code has to be modified.
         -- If the number of segments in the flexfield definition is changed then the number of
         -- separators has also to be modified.
    ln_assignment_id := name_in('COST.ASSIGNMENT_ID');
    ld_session_dt := name_in('CTL_GLOBALS.SESSION_DATE');
    smc_customlib.set_exp_act(
                                                                     ln_retcode,
                                                                     lvc2_errbuf,
                                                                     ln_user_id,
                                                                     ln_assignment_id,
                                                                     ld_session_dt,
                                                                     lvc2_company_nm,
                                                                     lvc2_LOB,
                                                                     lvc2_location,
                                                                     lvc2_dept,
                                                                lvc2_first_rec
    if ln_retcode = -1 then
         -- b wagner 4/6/05 - raise trigger failure so bad combinations can't be entered into costing screen
         fnd_message.set_string(lvc2_errbuf);
         fnd_message.error;
         raise form_trigger_failure;
    end if;
                        end if; -- If costing string is complete
                   end if;   If First Record of COST Block
                   end if; -- If Block is COST
         end if;     -- For Assignment form.
    ================================================================================================================
    Its the custom package that actually populates the changes in Costing Screen onto the Assignment Screen, but I want to activate this only when I save the changes on the Costing Screen. Right now the changes are seen on Assignment Screen when I hit CTRL=F11 even when I don's save the Costing Screen changes.
    Thank You,
    Ngagadam.
    Message was edited by:
    Naveen Gagadam
    Message was edited by:
    Naveen Gagadam
    Message was edited by:
    Naveen Gagadam
    Message was edited by:
    Naveen Gagadam

  • There are values for cost element 80000 that are not assigned to any line I

    Hi,
    While calulating WIP I am getting below error:
    There are values for cost element 80000 that are not assigned to any line ID
    Message no. KJ161
    Diagnosis
    Not all values for the cost element are assigned to a line ID.
    Procedure
    Assign the cost element to a line ID. If you don't want to include the cost element in results analysis, assign it to a line ID of category N.
    You can access a detailed list of unassigned cost elements as follows: Start results analysis in the individual processing mode (transaction KKA1, KKA2, or KKA3). Select the field Full log. Execute the function. On the next screen, choose Logs -> Parameter List in the menu. A list is generated. The unassigned values are shown at the end of the list.
    If cost element "+++++++++" was shown in the message, this is because in the assignment of costs and revenues to line IDs, you have not used a cost element other than the full masking "+++++++++". In this case a presummarization eliminates the information on the cost element.
    Cost Element 80000 is of type 43 Internal activity allocation, I have Masked this in OKGB as below:
    Controlling Area = FLGP
    RA Version = 0
    Masked Cost Element = 000008++++
    Masked Cost Center = ++++++++++
    Masked Activity Type = +++++
    ReqToCap= COS (Secondary Cost)
    I have Configure OKGA also but still system is giving error.
    Please help me to understand.
    Regards,
    Vivek

    I was wondering if you could help me I am trying to configure the RA key for Refurb orders and when I go into txn OKGB for the Assignment of C/E for WIP there is sample config already there which I copied.  But I am having difficulty getting the KK1A to work I am getting the message as outlined above.  Could you explain how this OKGB works and how to configure it a bit more fully.  In my sample config there is a ReqTOCap section and in it there are letters like ABR, EK, FK, EL what do they mean.  This is a screen shot of it.  I am not sure how to go about this entirely so any light you could shed would be greatly appreciated.  Can you suggest a good resource or documentation you may have, would be greatly appreciated.

  • When douwnloading adobe premier pro fails. Writes that the installation is complete, some optional components are not installed correctly. What to do?

    When downloading Adobe Premier pro fails, write that the installation is complete, some optional components are not installed correctly. What to do?

    check your install logs for the problem, http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/troubleshoot-install-logs-cs5-cs5.html

  • When I download Photoshop CC I get everytime a message "Completed installation, some optional components are not installed correctly. (6)"

    When I download Photoshop CC I get everytime a message "Completed installation, some optional components are not installed correctly. (6)"
    What can i do?
    I have Windows 8 and i7 with gtx760
    Please help me

    Please send me the installer logs to [email protected] from C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Adobe\Installers
    The file name would be like: Adobe Photoshhop cc 2014 15.0 <Date>.log 
    -Pragya

  • RADIUS-assigned VLANs are not supported when you enable multiple BSSIDs

    Could someone please tell me is this 100% correct?
    "RADIUS-assigned VLANs are not supported when you enable multiple BSSIDs"
    Any ideas why? Does anyone have a way around this?
    As a workaround I was thinking of setting up one broadcast SSID for guests and one non-broadcast SSID for RADIUS assigned VLANs, however i'd prefer to have both broadcast due to numerous Vista and PDA connection issues.

    Hi.
    Thanks for your reply.
    That is what I would like to do; have one SSID and assign the users to different VLANs based on policy.
    I have all the VLANs and subinterfaces set up correctly and working independently, but the VLAN assigment does not seem to work correctly.
    If I do a "show dot11 association all-client" the RADIUS attribute appears to have altered the VLAN, but the device has no connectivity and cannot DHCP.
    This is with 1130AG in autonomous mode and Microsoft IAS as RADIUS.
    Apparently there may be a problem with mbssid and RADIUS assigned VLANs.

  • CK11N alert:"Costing item 00001 is not assigned to a cost component"

    Hi,
         When I use CK11N, fill in all the necessary field, there will appear a alert.
          The detail as follows:
    Costing item 00001 is not assigned to a cost component
    Message no. CK 334
    Diagnosis
    No cost component is assigned to costing item 00001.
    System Response
    The costs for the costing item are not shown.
    Procedure
    Go into Customizing for Product Cost Controlling and check the assignment of cost elements to cost components.
           I have used KA03,KL03,CR03 to checked previous datas, but I find no errors?
    What is the problem?

    Hi,
    Use OKTZ to create cost component structure.
    Check for some of these settings also
    Configuration:
    Define costing sheets
    OKTZ create cost component structure
    OKK4 Define valuation variant
    OKKN Define cost variant
    Master Data:
    KP26 setup activity rates
    CR01 setup work centers
    MM01 setup material masters
    CS01 setup Bill of Materials
    CA01 setup routings
    Regards,
    Murali

  • Cost element 7000218 is not assigned to a cost component in CostCompStruct

    Dear All,
    How to change the standard price in MR21 for materials with Price Determination Control 3 ( header level V & 3) (Split level S & 3)
    In MR21, when I am updating the price for initial stock uploading.
    It throws me a error Cost element 7000218 is not assigned to a cost component in CostComp Struct 01
    Actually the cost component structure 01 is not active. we are using OP cost component structure & it is active , further the  assigned to  the company code level.
    Cost element 7000218 is assigned to the cost component structure OP.
    please suggest why it result in above error, even though we are not using cost component structure 01.
    Regards
    Subbu.

    Hi,
    Did you change the cost component structure assignment for the plant ?
    This error could be produced due to the fact that for this plant the cost component struture was changed from 01
    But ML tables makes reference to the old cost component structure.
    You can check table CKMLKEV.
    During the creation of the material the system creates data for the current, previous and last period of the last year (12 2010).
    Therefore the system tries/ needs to create also a cost componet split for the period 12 2010. For this it must used the cost component structure for this period 12 2010 (maybe 01).
    In such a case you have to define the cost element in '01' as well.
    Please do read note 434873 carefully for the side effect and correct procedure to change cost component structure.
    regards
    Waman

  • Plant and Cost Center are not displaying in FI doc. for asset scrap ABAVN.

    Hi All,
    When we do asset retirement by Scraping using Transaction Code ABAVN, Plant and Cost center are not appearing in the FI document. But, in the master data the Plant and Cost center are assigned for the particular Asset. 
    When I see the FI document display, the fields Cost Center and Plant are blank.  Business Area and Profit Center fields are getting updated.
    Can any one help me how to get this Plant and Cost Center in the posted document.  Is there any OSS notes for this.  I am using ECC 6.0 version.
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Rajesh

    Rajesh
    Aditional on me answer.
    The systemtakes not the cost center from the asset you have to assign it in OKB9 or to fill in during this posting:
    Steps
    Click on Simulate, than you see the posting screen:
    Click on the line (pk 40)
    Click on Goto and Additional account assignment and fill in the cost center whatu2019s in the master record of the asset and post
    An other option is to make a substitution to get this information

  • PO created successfully using BAPI. But G/L, Cost Center are not displaying

    Hi,
    I am trying to create a purchase Order type limit order using BAPI_PO_CREATE1. PO created successfully. when I try to see the PO using ME23N transaction,in  the account assignment tab G/L and cost center are blank. In my BAPI, I am populating all the values in item and account internal tables.
    I am debugging all the time and not able to find why G/L and Cost center are not poplulating in PO.
    Pls suggest me how to finish this problem.
    Thankm,
    Ram

    Hi,
    Are you passing the update flag in POACCOUNTX table?
    regards,
    Ankur Parab

  • Plan cost of IW31 not updating when MRP4 of Material master is individual requirement

    Hi,
    When Individal/coll of MRP4 tab of Raw material is 1 Individual requirement, plan cost is not updating in Tcode IW31 Repair order. It is updating when MRP4 is 2 collective requirement.
    Please let me know the possible reasons.
    Thanks

    Yongguo
    The behavior you are seeing on your system is correct system behavior.                                                                               
    The system rolls costs/revenues up to the assigned wbs element                
    if an order or network activity is flagged for deletion so you                
    can archive orders/networks while the project is still 'alive' without        
    loosing information on costs/revenues.                                        
    The logic is that costs of deleted networks should not get lost but are       
    rolled up to the superior wbs-element.                                                                               
    SAP has the understanding that released activities are used immediately,      
    carry actual costs and, therefore, can not be deleted. To keep the            
    objects clearly arranged the reorganization run can be used to move           
    some objects (those with status DLFL) to the archive without losing           
    data (in the meaning of costs).                                                                               
    If you want to remove these costs of the WBS elements you have                
    to cancel the deletion flag of these networks, remove the planned costs       
    start network costing and save. You can then set the DLFL again and           
    the costs will not appear in the structure report.  
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards
    Martina

  • COPA document created from billing document, cost components are twice

    Hi Experts,
    Ref Subject line : COPA document created from billing document, cost components are twice.
    I have checked the following :
    1.  Cost Estimate of a material
    2.  Production Confirmation of the Order
    When comparing both of the above, they are same, without variance.
    Now when a COPA document is created, we observe the Cost Component Split in Sales Order to be exactly TWICE as compared to Cost Estimate of the material.
    May I please request help from you all. What must be the cause & where do i check / rectify.
    Regards,
    Hussein.

    Hi Hussein
    If you are seeing double in KE30 Report - May be you are updating both sales order and billing doc in COPA and hence you are seeing 2 line items.. But one of them will be record type A and the other one with F
    If the above is not the case and you are seeing double in the COPA document itself - Then See if you have mapped VPRS cond type in KE4I to the same value fields as Cost Comp Split
    Also, one strong possibility that you are using Batch Split in SD.. .... Which means your delivery document (VL03N) will have multiple batches of materials being delivered to the customer....
    a. In this case, your Item Category for main item (HPOS) and Sub Item (UPOS) has to be different and the Item catg for UPOS should not be relevant for billing / Costs... Note 77414 descirbes this situation and the settings to be done in SD Customizing
    b. You may need to apply note 352441 in your system
    Regards
    Ajay M
    Edited by: Ajay Maheshwari on Dec 1, 2010 5:36 PM

Maybe you are looking for