Permit not assigned for Actual cost

Hi Dears,
Permit not assigned for actual cost in maint order
Actual cost in maintenance order is 3000
In IPMD, cost1 is assigned with class ACTUAL COST and value 3000 is defined.
In OIPG, Permit class ACTUALCOST is assigned.
Goods issue done to order for value 3000.
Again cost determination executed, but still cost1 is not assinged to the work order.
Am i missing anything ?
Regards,
Alagesan M

Hi
In charac CT04 i maintained one value 3000 and table maintained CSEVPERMIT and IKOSTEN
In class CL01, assigned the charac for 049 class type
In OIPG, permit class is maintained with class
In IPMD, new permit created and assigned class in classification and maintained 3000
Now order created and component assigned the planned value is 3000.
through MIGO goods issue done and found the actual value is 3000.
But still opened the permit found nothing assigned.
For Estimated cost and planned costs it is working good only for actual cost permit is not assigning.
Actual cost we need to anything more other than this ?
Alagesan

Similar Messages

CO-PC Cost components are not assigned when actual cost was posted

Hi Expert,
I estimate material cost by Tcode CK11N, the result is cost components were assigned to plan cost. It's okay. But, I have a problem when posting actual cost.
After actual cost was posted by confirming backflush, I run Tcode KKBC_PKO to check again, but Cost Component field is not assigned to actual cost.
Please tell me the reason.
Regard,

Hi,
Thank for your answer.
I will check Cost component Structure, and ensure that all cost elements were assigned.
Additional, cost components were assigned to PLAN cost, but not assigned to ACTUAL cost.
Do I have to configure something more?
Regard,

Cost element 7000218 is not assigned to a cost component in CostCompStruct

Dear All,
How to change the standard price in MR21 for materials with Price Determination Control 3 ( header level V & 3) (Split level S & 3)
In MR21, when I am updating the price for initial stock uploading.
It throws me a error Cost element 7000218 is not assigned to a cost component in CostComp Struct 01
Actually the cost component structure 01 is not active. we are using OP cost component structure & it is active , further the assigned to the company code level.
Cost element 7000218 is assigned to the cost component structure OP.
please suggest why it result in above error, even though we are not using cost component structure 01.
Regards
Subbu.

Hi,
Did you change the cost component structure assignment for the plant ?
This error could be produced due to the fact that for this plant the cost component struture was changed from 01
But ML tables makes reference to the old cost component structure.
You can check table CKMLKEV.
During the creation of the material the system creates data for the current, previous and last period of the last year (12 2010).
Therefore the system tries/ needs to create also a cost componet split for the period 12 2010. For this it must used the cost component structure for this period 12 2010 (maybe 01).
In such a case you have to define the cost element in '01' as well.
Please do read note 434873 carefully for the side effect and correct procedure to change cost component structure.
regards
Waman

CK11N alert:"Costing item 00001 is not assigned to a cost component"

Hi,
     When I use CK11N, fill in all the necessary field, there will appear a alert.
      The detail as follows:
Costing item 00001 is not assigned to a cost component
Message no. CK 334
Diagnosis
No cost component is assigned to costing item 00001.
System Response
The costs for the costing item are not shown.
Procedure
Go into Customizing for Product Cost Controlling and check the assignment of cost elements to cost components.
       I have used KA03,KL03,CR03 to checked previous datas, but I find no errors?
What is the problem?

Hi,
Use OKTZ to create cost component structure.
Check for some of these settings also
Configuration:
Define costing sheets
OKTZ create cost component structure
OKK4 Define valuation variant
OKKN Define cost variant
Master Data:
KP26 setup activity rates
CR01 setup work centers
MM01 setup material masters
CS01 setup Bill of Materials
CA01 setup routings
Regards,
Murali

Cost element is not assigned to a cost component

Dear All,
On trying to run costing for finished good having one BOM component, system create error in costing log as-
Message no-239-Cost element 954001 is not assigned to a cost component 1
On seeing details:
Cost element 954001 is not assigned to a cost component
Message no. CK239
Diagnosis
The system attempted to generate the cost component split for the material, but discovered that no assignment has been made in cost component structure Z2 for cost element 954001 and possibly for origin group .
System Response
The cost component split is incomplete. The cost of goods manufactured in the cost component split is therefore less than in the itemization.
ProcedureGo into Customizing for Product Cost Controlling and carry out the assignment for cost component structure Z2 and chart of accounts AICA.
where i am missing the required setting.
please guide
regards

Hi,
Use T.Code OKTZ for the relative cost element has to be assigned to one of the components there in
the cost component structure. Choose the nature of assignment for eg. raw material, choose the source and give the cost element. Then choose Assignment and give settlement through Cost center, Order.While coming back activate the cost component structure and save. Try for the Costing.
Regards,
Sadashivan

Report painter/writer for actual cost component split

Hello Gurus,
Any of you guys ever explored possibility of creating a report using report painter or writer that can give both Standard and Actual cost component splits in one report? Is it even possible without custom ABAP involvement?
Thanks
RG

Hi Raghu,
After your reply, I am getting a doubt..
Have you Activated Material Ledger? When you say Actual Cost Component Split, are you talking about it what you get in Actual Costing/Material Ledger?
If yes, then you can map your cost compnents for Actual Costing in the path SPROControllingProfitability AnalysisMaster Data Valuation--Setup Valuation using Material Cost Estimate -- Define Access to Actual Costing / Material Ledger
Further, there are no standard reports available in COPA. Try to build a report comprising two columns, 1st column with the value fields which are mapped for Standard Cost Components and 2nd column with the Value Fields which you have assined for Actual Costing under the above path.
You will be able to get the comparison...
Pls don't hesitate to call me for further assistance....
Srikanth Munnaluri

Issue in creating Invoice when route is not relevant for shipment cost.

Dear All,
We are facing a problem while creating an Invoice. The route used in shipment in not relevant for shipment costing. Shipment type is relevant for costing. So in normal scenario if I don't remove the tick mark from "Shipment cost relanace" at shipment type and proceed with Invoicing I get error as " SHipment costing is not complete", which is correct. The scenario works well if item/s in delivery are not batch split.
But, if items in delivery are batch split and "shipment cost relevance" check is not removed from shipment type then, only batch split items get copied in invoice. Header item is deleted and invoice gets saved, which should not happen.I don't get error in this scenario.
How should I make the error in invocie work in case of batch split items also? Could anyone please let me know?
Thanks!

Dear Manmeet Mohan K,
Can you please check the copy controls in between delivery document to invoice(VTFL)
Thanks&Regards
Raghu.k

Incorrect exchange rate for Actual cost documents

Dear all experts,
I have an actual cost documents which was created on 02.10.2006,it should be taking the value date for currency exchange as 01.09.2006,but it is taking 01.
04.2006 hence it resulting in picking wrong exchange rate.Any solution to solve it and what is the cause of this issue? Thank You

hie, the currency is set in the table TCURR. the time rederence ? sorry,I am very new to this.the user just told me to that the currency for actual cost taken wrongly,all i managed to check is tat the value date for currency translation for tat particular actual cost document is 01.04.2006,tat's y it took the wrong exchange rate. And i guess the exchange rate is already updated in BW.

Reason for Actual Cost Error in Production Order

Hi,
I have Convert the planned order to Production order but error message coming "Actual Cost Error".
what procedure that error avoid.
plz, Advise me.
By,
Jeevan.S

Hi
1.problem could be with the activity type costing.
check KP26 data maintained or not (for activity and costcentre assigned to work cneter)
2.IF order having CSER status then do the cost caliculation in the order, so that the status will go.(do thsi after correcting the KP26 data)
if still facing check the error
-ashok

Report for actual cost of WBS, Profit center wise

Hi Experts,
Do we have any standard report that gives the actual cost of WBS/Project with Profit center wise.
Thanks,
Krishna

Hi,
Thanks for your solutions.
But I m looking for the Profit center in the report (display screen), not in selection screen.
My scenario is like, the cost was posted to WBSE with X profit center/cost center in January, now I changed the profit center to Y for the same WBSE and posted.
Want to see thru which PC I have posted to WBSE and how much. So that I can reversal.
Thanks again.
Krishna.
Edited by: krishna.gujju on Jul 8, 2011 6:56 PM

COPA Costing key for actual cost component split

Hi,
I would like to allow the users to specify different period/year in the following screen every month when they do the COPA revaluation. However i noticed this screen is part of customization and cannot be changed by the users without a transport. As such how can we allow the users to change the period/year by themselves every month?

Hi Sanjay Ram,
Whatever the marked one i.e. period/year is used especially when you want to consider the PUP or actual cost the material for that specific period only. As you know it can not be changed in every period.
So, for that purpose only we have the above one i.e. period a/c to line item, by this system is going to pick the PUP or actual cost of the specific period for which the line item has taken place (the line item that may be billing or settlement)
Regards..
Jose

MR21 price change for actual cost of inventory

Hi
Material ledger is not active. We have four FERT materials and four production orders in April 2011. Material inventory is on standard price. We want closing inventory at actual value. I have tried to change the price via MR21 but system is not allowing me to change price because cost estimate is exist.
Actual production order cost divided by actual production = actual cost per unit.
I want to use this price in MR21 to re-valuate the inventory in current month.
hope clear.
regards

Hi Imdad
Here is a workaround which I used many times
a. Create a New Costing variant, with Costing Type = Release to Prices other than Std Cost
b. The Valuation Variant settings must be as below
For Materials - Strategy J (Price as per Price Control as of Last Period)
For Activity prices - Actual Price of Previous Period
c. At month end, once you calculate Actual Activity price, you can create a Costing Run in Ck40N
The Costing date can be 01.Apr.2011, if you are running the Cost Estimate for March 2011
d. The price calculated to be stored in Plan price 2 field of the Material Master or Tax price field
You can get a comparison of original Std cost and the revised std cost.... If need be, you can pass a JV in FI for the Stock (x) Revised price - Original Std price
5. If need be, you can also revaluate the COGS in COPA using this std cost estimate

FM for Actual cost line items for orders.

HI EXPERTS,
I was working on Actual cost line items for orders / Internal orders of an employee.
standard program RKAEP000 is present through TCODE KOB1.
I want some customization of report, so debugged the program and found that its using a FM 'K_LINE_ITEMS_SELECT_AND_LIST' to calculate internal orders.
But the FM has used REUSE_ALV_* and displaying output itself.
the requirement is to customize the output display .
I searched with K_LINE_* and found some other function modules too.
K_LINE_ITEM_CHECK
K_LINE_ITEM_APC_SIGN_GET
K_LINE_ITEM_GET_CONTEXT_MENU
K_LINE_ITEM_GET_TOOLBAR
K_LINE_ITEM_LOGICAL_KEY_GET
K_LINE_ITEM_TECH_SETTINGS_SET
K_LINE_ITEM_VALUE_TYPES_GET
K_LINE_ITEM_VALUE_TYPES_SET
K_LINE_ITEMS_ACT_GRID
K_LINE_ITEMS_SELECT
K_LINE_ITEMS_SELECT_AND_LIST
K_LINE_ITEM_ACT_CALL_WITH_DATA
K_LINE_ITEM_ACT_DATA_GET
K_LINE_ITEM_CM_CALL_WITH_DATA
K_LINE_ITEM_DEV_CALL_WITH_DATA
K_LINE_ITEM_PLN_CALL_WITH_DATA
K_LINE_ITEM_PROCESS_UCOMM_ACT
K_LINE_ITEM_STEERING_GET
Can anybody tell which FM should i use so that result i will get in an internal table?
or suggest any other methods
Thanks in Advance.
Lucky

I also had the same requirement and used function module K_LINE_ITEM_ACT_DATA_GET
this function is calling K_LINE_ITEMS_SELECT_AND_LIST function with I_NO_DISPLAY parameter
and returning the result.
Already they are in same function group,
I wrote this for future requirements of people after 4 years of this thread

Delivery cost is not equal to actual cost in sales order

I met a strange phenomenon is the sale cost in SO is not equal to the cost in delivery order.
I order 3 PCS material and each cost is 43.87 and the total cost is 131.61.
However when I finished PGI the FI document shows the cost is 131.62. the diff is 0.01
I don't know how the diff comes.
Do you know the reason for the above issue?
Thank you very much for your help.
Yang

have you checked whether there are different pricing conditions?
in Sales order, the price is calculated based on the pricing date in the order, if you then create a new delivery, the price is re-calculated with the delivery date, but the sales order still has the old pricing information.
Check the pricing log of the sales order and invoice (tab "conditions") to see, which pricing condition is used.
Or is it possible that your order uses a foreign currency? SO maybe the exchange rate has changed since creating the order.
Regards
Ralf

Invoice Approval not required for certain cost centres

Hi - Can anyone advise how to setup in R12 so that AP Invoices for certain Cost Centers do not require approval in Payables Invoice Approval, Approvals Management?
Thanks

In PTARQ --> Customizing --> ESS > Service Specific Settings > Working Time > Leave Request > Processing Processes > Specify Processing Processes for Types of Leave, for each combination of rule group, PS grouping and absence type where approval is not required, untick the "Requests have to be approved" flag.
I haven't tried this as we haven't had the need, but I assume it will work.

Permit not assigned for Actual cost

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for