Delivery from projects not included in dynamic availability check

Problem:
In our client, we use deliveries for project (delivery type LP, delivery item type DLP) triggered from network reservations.
During delivery creation, we are finding that the existing deliveries are not being considered/cumulated into the ATP calculation. For example, for a given a material with an on hand balance of 22 units, individual deliveries for 4 units are created every day. The individual delivery passes the availability check test as it is always backed by the 22 units of stock. However, as a whole now the individual deliveries are totaling 80 units, exceeding the quantity on hand.
Is there any way to fine tune the availability check through customizing such that these deliveries for project created are included in CO09 and the delivery for project creation?
Or this should be an enhancement?. Client is in SAP R/3 version 4.7
Thanks,
Marco

Query posted in the PP Forum and hence this is closed.

Similar Messages

PS: WBS is not flowing for a Material, while creating delivery from Project

Hi,
While creating delivery from Project thro CNS0, WBS is not flowing for a Material in delivery, in turn WBS is not flowing in Billing document for same material, in turn not allowing to Post the Billing document to Accounting.
Error while releasing Billing to the Accounting: Accounting Entry is not generated. Error Message:Assign Condition type
YMRG in COPA.
Pls let me know, what can be the reason ?
Thanks.
Amit.

Hi Kuldeep,
Check this note,
Note 159387 - Message BP603: incorrect line item is displayed
Its valid only till 4.6. Might give you some idea but.
Regards,
Gokul

Delivery from Projects

PS Gurus,
One question regarding delivery from projects.
I add Header component T-20000 in activity and explode the BOM in project.
As a result of this, all the components pertaining to T-20000 comes up in project.This BOM explosion changes the item category of T-20000 to T.
The question is how do I produce this T-20000 through Production order? I cannot run MRP for this material as it is not relevant to MRP in MRP settings (set to ND). I will change it to PD. But why the its item category changes to T?
After its production, how do I deliver from PS since its just a text item.
Please reply urgently.
regards
Sunny

Sunny,
I´m afraid this is a standard behavior. Once you explode the BOM in CN22, the header material will remain in the project just as Text item.
As a workarround, you can consider adding material T-20000 again as an individual material (not exploding the BOM) or including material T-20000 in its own BOM as if it were a component.
Another option is to try CN33, Bill of Material transfer. As far as I know, the header material will not be added as text item if you transfer the BOM.
Hope this helps
Regards

Delivery from Project - reg

Hello,
in my project i want to deliver material frm my project.
Now iam using thg CNS0,
i want to know the difference between CNS0 and VL01N.
which way is better to deliver material frm project and difference b/w those.
pls help me in this regard,
Regards,
Prakash.
Reward points for useful answer.

Hi Prakash,
CNS0 is transaction for project delivery and VL01N is for ales order based dlivery. Which one to adopt is dependent on the rest of the configuration and business requirement.
Project delivery type is "LP' and default delivery item category type is "DLP'.
Primary difference between project delivery and other deliveries is that project delivery does not create any requirement (TOR) , whereas in the case of sales order based deliveries, deliveries create requirements. i.e, requirements which were till then emanating from sales orders, emanate from delivey once a delivery is created.
Another major difference is that with VL01N, you can do delivery related billing, whereas deliveries created using CNS0 cannot be referenced for billing.
Hence, if there is no billing process involved, CNS0 would be the ideal choice. If mile stone billing is involved, again CNS0 would be the obvious choice. If delivery related billing is involved, possibly you may have to go in for VL01N.
Some explanations provided in SAP Note:677169 are quoted below:
Quote begins:
Delivery from project (CNS0)
a) How can I change delivery type 'LP' ?
                       Answer:
Delivery type 'LP' (0VLK) is hard coded and can not be changed.
b) Why is availability check not executed in CNS0 ?
                       Answer:
Please check whether availability check is switched off by delivery item category (0VLK; indicator 'AvailCkOff').
c) Why does availability check in CNS0 return different quantitites than availability check in network ?
                       Answer:
Availability check is controlled by checking rule and checking group. In CNS0 checking rule is hard coded to 'B ' for plant stock and 'BE' for individual stock. In network checking rule is defined by order control (plant/order type/business func.) and might therefore differ from the hard coded checking rule used by CNS0.
Please be aware that also in SD ATP checking rule for delivery is hard coded with same values.
Please check ATP result with transaction CO09.
d) How can I filter out components in CNS0 ?
                       Answer:
Please refer to notes 546029 and 891134.
Quote ends.
Hope you find the explanation useful.
Muraleedharan.R

Delivery from project appearing in billing due list

Hi,
We have a scenario in which delivery is done through project (Tcode CNS0) and the billing is done through sales order (order related billing)
The delivery type LP used for the delivery is not assigned to billing type since we are not supposed to do billing with respect to delivery document.
But these delivery documents are appearing in billing due list (VF04) and remain there in the due list
We want delivery documents (from project) NOT to appear in the billing due list.
Please help.

Hi Shambhu,
Lets assume ZLP is not relevant for billing and if delivery is done then how can excise invoice ibe generated.
Issue is delivery doc type LP is assigned to billing type which is meant for excise invoice and not assigned to billing type of final invoice.
Now in India, why LP is assigned to excise invoice billing type, because for every delivery excise invoice is created.
But for the same delivery type LP in europe, excise is not created and hence these documents remain there in billing due list.
The issue can only be resolved if europe starts using another delivery type like ZLP which is not assigned to any billing type, but again that seems to be very difficult to implement at this moment of time.
Thanks Shambhu.

Delivery from Project with reference to sales order

Dear All,
I am facing problem in delivery. In my case scenario is-
1. There are 10 materials with 20 quantities.
2. I create a sales order only for two material with 5 quantities and enter wbs element number.
Now when i use CNS0, enter sales order number and wbs elelment number system shows all 10 materials that I dont want means I want the materials that are included in sales order. Please help me how to control this.

Please read SAP Help for a better under standing...
I mentioned below a line from SAP help for your info.
...... it selects material components, the system takes components into account that have been assigned to either a network or ...... ...
Please follow the below path to access the help..
SAP Help Portal >>> Logistics >>>> Project System >>> Material >>>> Delivery from Projects......

Account Determination Error when doing GI for Delivery from Projects

Hi,
When we try and Goods Issue a delivery from Projects, we get the following error:
Account determination for entry 0 GBB 0001 ___ 7900 not possible
We are not sure why the Account grouping code comes through with no value. Please could someone assist with this issue.
Regards,
De Wet

Hi,
Check in T code OBYC,whether the account determination is maintained against the valuation class for BPX.
Regards

How to purchase Ipod Games from countries not included in the Ipod Store???

How to purchase Ipod Games from countries not included in the Ipod Store??? Could anyone tell me?

Hello kismet_kracker,
What happens if you place the iPod into Disk Mode with it still connected to your Mac? Does it then show up in Finder as a mounted drive? Here are instructions for putting your iPod into Disk Mode.
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1363
B-rock

Depo Excise Invoice but Delivery from Project

Dear Experts,
my requirement is i am creating Excise Invoice W.R.T delivery from Project in J1IJ.
And we are creating order related commercial Invoice to the Customer which order is assigned to WBS Element
here how we will bring excise values into the commercial Invoice.
regards
etr

Ajith thanks for ur reply,
please understood my requirement
Normal Depo Sales is like VA01-VL01N-J1IJ----VF01 here whatever excise values captured in J1IJ those values come to the commercial Invoice.
As per My requirement we are creating Project and while creating sales order we have to assign WBS element.
now Project -Delivery--Excise Invoice J1IJ
Sales order -
Inovice VFO1
my question is how excise and commercial Invoice values come together.
regards
etr

Dynamic availability check not taking reservation accumulation into account

We have 2 production orders for which the availability check had been done and situation is
Finished good has 1 component and the Plant stock of the component is 99 EA.No other receipts are in place.
Order1 is for quantity of 100 EA
Order2(at a later date than order1) is 1 EA
Post availaility check using COHV, Order1 is confirmed for 99 EA and is with MACM status and order2 has no commitment and is with MSPT status.
Dynamic availability check for CO27 in OMCP config points to the same checking rule we used during the intial material availabillity check.
In the Movement type config 261 movement type is assigned to dynamic avl.check - F Message in any case: E mess. for non-avail., otherw. S mess.
When we execute CO27 individually for the orders we can trap the error as per availability check commitments as we have seen earlier.
But when we try to input both orders together in CO27 and do a pick list confirmation the second order gets the component issue with the first one not getting posted (expected to be partially to the tune of 99 EA) thereby violating the availability check results ultimately.
Request your help in knowing whether this is the SAP design or am i missing some thing else?

Query posted in the PP Forum and hence this is closed.

Dynamic Availability Check for Goods Issue,Transfer Posting

Dear All,
Can anyone explain the Dynamic Availability Check??
I mean the relevance on setting this indicator for a mov.type?
In OMCM & OMCP I have defined a Checking Rule & also assigned the same to a Mov.type as well the transaction code?
whether the Dynamic Availability Check concept is same in case of sales ie Say I have a Stock of 100 qtys for a material in a plant & in the availability Scope of Check I have ticked the include safety stock.
In my material master I have a safety stock of 500 qtys.
So when I do a transfer posting for this material with Qty as 200, System should allow me do proceed as in my availability check I have enabled the safety stock option.
But this is not happening & I am getting an error message as deficit of stock 100 nos. Also what is use of setting the dynamic availability check indicator for my mov.type as A - Warning message , B - Error Message etc..
Kindly suggest valuable inputs.
Thanks & Regards,

For e.g. there is Available Stock = 1000 qty and safety stock in material master = 500 qty then system will allow you to use 1000 qty only not 1500 qty
This is only used for availability check purpose whether system it should be considered or not?
And following indicators means;
A W mess. only issued in the case of non-availability
B E mess. only issued in the case of non-availability
E Message in any case: W mess. for non-avail., otherw. S mess.
F Message in any case: E mess. for non-avail., otherw. S mess.
S Availability check only with simulation
The above indicators indicate whether the system is to check for existing material requirements.
Award appropriately once the thread is answered.

Dynamic Availability Check in MB26

Hi! We have turned on the dynamic availability check function to output an error if an issue is attempted and where there is no stock. E.g.
Stock level - 100
Reservation 1 - 60 -> system committed 60
Reservation 2 - 40 -> system committed 40
Reservation 3 - 10 -> system creates reservation with 0 unit commited
Now, if I try to create a GI using MIGO or MB1A on reservation 3, I get the error message. However, if I do the same in MB26 the goods issue posting goes through.
In the configuration for 'Set Dynamic Check', I found that I cannot add the checking rule to new transactions so that option is out.
I have looked in OSS notes but found nothing.
Is this a bug or is it a special feature that SAP has allowed here? Are there other ways around this.
Cheers!
SF

No answer to question.

Delivery from project stock

hello!
i have following requirement
- sales order -> creates a requirement to unrestricted stock
- delivery -> creates a requirement to unrestricted stock
during delivery processing the materials are booked manually to project stock.
- at goods issue i want to book automatically from project stock
as i do not want to create requirements for project stocks, i cannot use a matching requirement class.
can someone think of a solution?
thanks!
matthias

Hi Fortain ,
I did bit of analysis to track it down and i noticed that when you run availability, system check for Checking Rule "B". I think if we want to enable WBS element field, it should be "BQ". I am trying to figure out. But no clue.
Let us keep trying.
Regards
Vinu

High Sea Sales mapping in delivery from projects

Hi,
I have got a typical scenario where in delivery is supposed to be thru PS.
Quotation consists of only the predefined Costing heads (non-deliverable & in line items) against which unit cost estimate is made using BPOs. After receipt of order the quotation is copied to create Sales Order and WBS elements are assigned at line item.
Deliverable materials are assigned at each WBS level in the designated Project and wrt the Sales Order, deliveries are created and billed. Pricing of the delivered materials is carried out in the billing doc.
There is a scenario in which imported materials originally planned to be sold from stock and whose delivery was to be created from projects is now converted to HSS.
Request to advise how to map this business process.
Regards,
Rajesh Mohapatra

Hi Rakesh,
1. When we do delivery thru CNS0 it Dr- FG Consumption /ac and Cr-FG Stock a/c. Suppose if i have to take this Dr-COGS-Fg and Cr-Fg Stock a/c. will you please suggest the necessary customization steps and user transactions.
2. In our scenario we have done delivery through CNS0. When we do billing, we are getting an error that Profitability segment is not derived for GL (revenue). I have checked the relevant derivation rules which looks correct. Do u have any idea how to maintain derivation rule to derive WBS element?
3. In other scenario, intstead of opting PS. We have followed: 1. Cretaed SO (with WBS). 2. MD04- Cretaed Planned Order 3. Converted Planned order to Process Order 4.Goods Issue and confirmation of process order 5.VL01N-Delivery (601 E).
While doing delivery we r getting an error that create GL (FG-COGS) as Cost element. This is GL is mapped to GBB-VAX.we have for GBB-VAY with cost elemnt. Do we have to create this GL also as cost element? why system is not picking from GBB-VAY? any idea
Regards,
Babu

Control for delivery from projects

Hi
Is there any way we can control the delivery of components from projects CNS0 using User statuses.
The components in project stock should not be delivered until the User status permits it.
Kindly advise.

Hi,
Please create a user status with business transaction "Goods Issue Delivery" as forbidden , and assign the status to the WBS element.
It should work. I have not tried it out though.
Muraleedharan.R

Delivery from projects not included in dynamic availability check

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for