Designer with 8i release (8.1.6)

I did a upgrade of my database from Oracle 8.1.5 to Oracle 8.1.6, I recover the information of Designer Repository successfully, but now when I try to do a change in a project in designer I found the next error:
ORA-04031 Unable to allocate 472 bytes of share memory ("large pool", "unknown object", "session heap","kgiobdtb"
The action for this error is increment the parameter SHARE_POOL_SIZE. In this moment my SHARE_POOL_SIZE have 50M and I added 30M more but the problem persist.
Somebody know if exist any problem between oracle 8.1.6 and Designer 6.0 or how i can to fix this problem?
null

Your "Large Pool" is what is running out of memory. Try increasing that.

Similar Messages

Issue with retriggering Release Strategy

Hi all,
We have a one off situation here. We had already 10 release staragies in our system. We added 2 more release strategies with a new characteristic. We updated the characteristic value only for the new 2 release strategues and did not update the rest 10. Although now we had updated the characteristic value for remaiining strategies, the purchase documents created in the mean tme is not subjected to release strategy. To ensure business control we need to retrigger back the release strategy for almost 1000's of documents.
As any change to purcahsing document will retrigger it when done manually, but given the number of documents and as per Note 493900 we cannot trigger it by any backgoriund job to modify as below:
16. Question :
Why is there no release strategy determination when a program changes in
background a purchasing document which corresponds to the classification of
a release strategy ?
Answer :
This is the system design that a release strategy determination can only be
triggered through a user action and not by changes made in background
process.
If you create a document (e.g. PO, Contract, etc), the determination of the
release strategy takes place only in case of a user event like checking or
saving the document.
Kindly suggest any best practise to retrigger release strategy for the missing documents to ensure business control. Any easy and time savig measure to get it resolved will be appreciated.
Regards,
Anand Sampath

Hi Arnand,
After investigation by searching customer messages database ,I found
other customer has similar problem as the release strategy has changed
after creation of the SES please review the explanation from developer
:(whose release code is 03 )
When you try to revoke the acceptance of the service entry sheets
in ML81N or ML81, the 'Enter release code' pop up window appears, but
entering the code that is determined via the menu path Goto -> Entry
Sheet -> Release Strategy (which is the 03), the SES remains the same.
Nothing changes. The status does not vary and no error or warning
message is issued.
Checking the customizing for the release strategy, the release code
03 should have never been assigned to the SES 800024272 as the values
for the relevant characteristics were not included under that code.
I do not know how it was managed to accept the SES.
Now, when you try to revoke it, it seems that no release
strategy can be determined, not even including the values RCARESANO
and 012 between the valid values for the characteristics of the release
code 03 (RCARESANO as valid value for SUPERVISOR_SERVICIOS
(CESSR-ERNAM)and 012 as valid value for GRUPO_COMPRAS (CESSR-EKGRP)).
The only Possibility is to change now the SES so that the release
strategy can be re-determined by the system.This is the Only possible
way that the system can redetermine the Release Strategy , but it will
not be possible to do so as the SES is already accepted with the Old
strategy and it does not admit any further changes.
To be able to change it you would need to revoke the SES first,
but this Will also not be possible as the Release Strategy was changed
and the system still applies the old rules for determining the Release.
Solution to our Problem
The Only way to revoke the SES is to Restore back the Old Strategy that
was prior to 03 in the customizing.So now what will happen is that by
applying the Old Rules the System will be able to revoke the SES that#s
using the Old one. Once the necessary SES are revoked then go back to
customizing and apply the new strategy as it was did now, and
Change the SES and save , the new value of the Release Strategy will get
updated in the table ESSR and the field frgsx will now have 03.
Problems associated if the Release strategy is changed
Actually the release strategy is not supposed to be changed when there
are some documents in the System that uses it and even if you change the
Strategy the Old records will not get AUTOMATICALLY UPDATED by the
system.The Release Strategy routine has to run again to update the
values. This is Possible by changing the document SES ,
This change will happen only if the SES is not accepted and if its
accepted then you need to revoke and to revoke you need to restore the
old strategy , revoke and then change the SES , and have to go back to
customizing and Start using the New strategy from now on by doing so the
Routine will update the old record with the new strategy.
b) You may want to use CEKKO-BADAT(Requisition Date) or any other
structure in CEBAN or CEKKO and create a new release strategy
to differentiate the old release strategy.
Hope this helps,
Kind Regards,
Matthew

Native Multi-VRF-Lite Design with EIGRP Question

Hello,
we think about to implement a VRF-Lite design (no MPLS and MBGP) in our campus network (10,000 ports, 20x 6500Sup720, 400x L2-Switches). MPLS is from our point of view oversized for our requirements. We need only a segmentation from different departments. Our IGP is eigrp.
In the latest IOS-Release for the cat6500 (12.2.18SXD) is finally a VRF-Lite support for EIGRP inside.
We could test successful a design with different VRFs in our lab, the division workes fine. But we didn't found a way to implement shared service. These are in our case DHCP, DNS, InternerAccess and some others. We thought about a redistribution between our global EIGRP routing table and the EIGRP-vrf tables, but we didn't found a way to do this.
How can we do this?
Thanks

Use a crossover cable to connect a port belonging to the global routing table to a port belonging to a VRF. This way you can leak EIGRP routes from the global routing table into the VRF (through that physical connection). The drawback is that you use 2 ports (that could instead be used for other things...).
Another way to this, would be to use static routing; use ip route vrf VRF x.x.x.x m.m.m.m n.n.n.n global to allow traffic to go from the VRF into the global routing table.
Hope that helps...

Problem with my release strategy (PR), Please help

Folks,
I have designed a release strategy with three characteristics:
This is what I entered in characteristic
1.PRQuantity with table name MEREQ3211GRID and Field :MENGE
2.PRmaterial # with table name RMMG1 and Field :MATNR
3.PRPlant with table name RMMG1 and Field :werks
the value for PRQuantity is >= 10000,000.
Also, I have set the indicator for (allow interval) in characteristics
Classes, procedure with classification, Release startegies are all proper.
I am getting the Release startegy tab in PR, but the problem is when I adopt a PR to create a PO with PO quantity >=10000, the release starategy gets picked up, which is perfect but it is also getting picked up with PO Quantity <=10000.
I dont understand why is it getting picked up for <=10000..Please suggest!!
Thanks in advance!!
Megha

Megha,
In your original post you said,
"1.PRQuantity with table name MEREQ3211GRID and Field :MENGE
2.PRmaterial # with table name RMMG1 and Field :MATNR
3.PRPlant with table name RMMG1 and Field :werks"
Per documentation I have seen, the table you should use for your characteristics for PRs should be CEBAN and CEKKO for POs. Here are some links to SAP notes you may find useful.
[365604 - Release strategies in purchasing|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=365604]
[493900 - Release Strategy|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=493900]
[672719 - Release strategies in the service|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=672719]
Note 365604 may be by far the most descriptive of how to set up the entire process. Hope this helps if you are still having problems.
Regards,
Paul

Why not include LiveCycle Designer with Creative Cloud subscription?

Creative Cloud offers quite a few premier Adobe products - which is great !! So how about Adobe offering LiveCycle Designer with Creative Cloud? It would be awesome ...

I wish I had enough time to tell you the hell I went through to get a my copy of LC3.
Long story short: Company purchased CC with CS6 and Acrobat 9 that comes with LC2. Saw a new version of Acrobat X released and LC3. Upgraded to Acrobat X and figured LC3 would come along since we had ALL Adobe applications because of our CC. Installed, noticed my LC2 had been uninstalled due to Acrobat X upgrade... TOOK MANY MANY MANY Custome support call to to find out NO ONE knew anything about LC2 and LC3 being on CC..., ended up with upgrade to LC3 after filing form to receive physical copy. Still angry at the whole thing.
Not only this, but LC4 is now out and it is not a free upgrade. But this is fine because nothing much changed from LC3.
So note. LC2 Came with first Creative Cloud due to Acrobat 9, then removed when Acrobat X released. LC2 deleted, no LC3 upgrade.
Message was edited by: TDRonline: Forgot to mention the downtime we had because we had to wait for our physical copy that took 2 weeks to arrive.

Issue with PO Release strategy

Hi experts,
I have problem with Po release strategy in 5 to 10 purchase orders, i have created few purchase orders(2000 Po's) with same document type and company code ..etc and saved, then release strategy has been triggered.
For few purhcase orders release strategy has not been triggered.
If i take 1 po from that few purchase orders(Release strategy has not triggered) as reference and again if i create PO,new purchase order have getting created with release strategy.
Can some body tel how this ican be possible, hope this might be standard syatem behaviour.
Hope i should delete thos e purchase orders and i should create new PO's instead of of old PO's (Without release strategy).
Some experts can share their experiance in this regard.
And how i should proceed further with this issue.??
Thanks

Hi,
You issue in your system has 2000Nou2019s purchase orders with release strategy has been triggered but 5 to 10 purchase orders do have release strategy.
& when you are creating a new PO with reference to old purchase orders (which release strategy has not triggered) and on saving NEW PO created with triggering release strategy.
Cause for above:
PO which release strategy does not trigger because the purchase orders are created before setting release strategy for PO. Those PO triggered release strategy and all are created after setting release strategy for PO.
Action:
Its completely business call for business users to go for options:
Option-- >1# You can use same old PO which release strategy does not triggered, do GR and all other process
Option-- >2# You can create new PO with reference old PO which release strategy does not triggered and upon saving you will have new PO number with release strategy triggered, then release PO & do GR and other related process.
Regards,
Biju K

Issue with PO release (multi level approval)

Hi,
Need help regarding PO release. I am working with 4 level approval process.
Information:
it is sequential release as I can see in workflow log, a new workflow gets generated for next level only after previous level executes the workitem.
Facing following issue at 2nd Level :
Level 2 releases item and it goes to Level 3, but workitem doesnt disappear from inbox.Once Level 3 releases item, an acceptance mail goes to Level 2. But along with the mail, updated workitem (i.e. showing release by 3rd level) also appears in inbox of Level2. Now two work items appear in Level2 Inbox.
In Workflow Log, this is how its behaving:
WORKFLOW STARTED-->
1st WF appears in WF log.
Level 1 releases WI ->
2nd workflow appears in WF log +
1st workflow with (in process status)
Level 2 releases WI ->
3rd WF appears +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (in process status)
Level 3 releases WI ->
3rd WF appears +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (in process status)
ISSUE: As soon as Level 3 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2 and Level3) along with the mail.
Level 4 releases WI ->
4th WF appears +
3rd WF appears (in process status) +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (STATUS COMPLETED)
ISSUE: As soon as Level 4 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2, Level3 and Level 4) along with the mail.
Result:
PO gets released.
In workflow log 2nd, 3rd and 4th workflow appear with IN PROCESS STATUS. All of them show process stopped at LEVEL2.

Hi Kjetil,
Release strategy is being used. Configuration for release strategy is given as following.
RGroup Rcode   Workflow     Agent
Z6          R1         1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Release is sequential.
For column 'Agent' mentioning position or User is not really useful because we are getting agents through Z table. Reason is: current org structure supports 1 position with multiple users from same department. In our scenario we need to find initiators department then find relevant approval levels for that departemnt. So I cannot mention any position in 'Agent' Column as release code will be locked against one position and one departetment.
Agents picked through Z table. Table has fields Agent/ UserID , level, department.
Logic to pick agents( Object and method created ):
When workflow starts, it finds department of the initiator.
For that department-> find approval levels available(L1, L2, L3).
For these levels -> Find Agent mentioned for that level.
Onece Agents are found for all levels -> Pass them to WF container.
In task activity, These agents are passed back to the rule and the task comes to know which agent it should go to.
Result : Four workflows start in sequence. When last level releases, only 1st workflow shows COMPLETED status. Rest three hang at level 2. If I see Me29N , release for that item is shown completed. To me it seems triggering of only first workflow is enough for release. Is there any way I can avoid trigerring of other three workflows?
Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:30 AM
Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:31 AM

Schedule lines should not be maintained with out release

schedule lines should not be maintained with out release of schedule agreement......but system accepting to maintain the schedule lines.Please say how.
regards,
Sridhar kumar.a

Hello,
I have the same problem as you. Someone know something about it?
kanyadhara, did yo solve this problem?
Thanks a lot

I have a production mobile Flex app that uses RemoteObject calls for all data access, and it's working well, except for a new remote call I just added that only fails when running with a release build. The same call works fine when running on the device

I have a production mobile Flex app that uses RemoteObject calls for all data access, and it's working well, except for a new remote call I just added that only fails when running with a release build. The same call works fine when running on the device (iPhone) using debug build. When running with a release build, the result handler is never called (nor is the fault handler called). Viewing the BlazeDS logs in debug mode, the call is received and send back with data. I've narrowed it down to what seems to be a data size issue.
I have targeted one specific data call that returns in the String value a string length of 44kb, which fails in the release build (result or fault handler never called), but the result handler is called as expected in debug build. When I do not populate the String value (in server side Java code) on the object (just set it empty string), the result handler is then called, and the object is returned (release build).
The custom object being returned in the call is a very a simple object, with getters/setters for simple types boolean, int, String, and one org.23c.dom.Document type. This same object type is used on other other RemoteObject calls (different data) and works fine (release and debug builds). I originally was returning as a Document, but, just to make sure this wasn't the problem, changed the value to be returned to a String, just to rule out XML/Dom issues in serialization.
I don't understand 1) why the release build vs. debug build behavior is different for a RemoteObject call, 2) why the calls work in debug build when sending over a somewhat large (but, not unreasonable) amount of data in a String object, but not in release build.
I have't tried to find out exactly where the failure point in size is, but, not sure that's even relevant, since 44kb isn't an unreasonable size to expect.
By turning on the Debug mode in BlazeDS, I can see the object and it's attributes being serialized and everything looks good there. The calls are received and processed appropriately in BlazeDS for both debug and release build testing.
Anyone have an idea on other things to try to debug/resolve this?
Platform testing is BlazeDS 4, Flashbuilder 4.7, Websphere 8 server, iPhone (iOS 7.1.2). Tried using multiple Flex SDK's 4.12 to the latest 4.13, with no change in behavior.
Thanks!

After a week's worth of debugging, I found the issue.
The Java type returned from the call was defined as ArrayList. Changing it to List resolved the problem.
I'm not sure why ArrayList isn't a valid return type, I've been looking at the Adobe docs, and still can't see why this isn't valid. And, why it works in Debug mode and not in Release build is even stranger. Maybe someone can shed some light on the logic here to me.

Dual-DMVPN Design with Dual Hubs on a single router ??

Hi All,
In DMVPN, in Dual-DMVPN Design with Dual Hubs , can a single router perform the role of dual hubs.
The router has two different internet links. It is intended that when one link goes down, spokes shud connect to the same router onto the other active internet connection. Is this possible ?

Since no one has answered yet, I'll give you the practical answer.
You'll have issues with IPSec and static routing. "DMVPN" itself probably wouldn't have an issue, but it would depend on IPSec and routing to work.
It is easier, by far, to put in a second router. And when you factor in your time to try to make it work (and it may not work), the second router is less expensive.
Rob

With classification release procedure for PO

Dear Experts ,
here one issue is with classification release procedure for PO
when I create characteristics
in Additional data
table name :-- Cekko field name :-- match code
enter
click all sec charars then which block I select to go next screen
and fill name is right or ?
please help me

hi,
in additional data field you have to give the field name of characteristic you are maintaining. like if you want to maintain characteristic as document type of the PO then we have to give the field name for document type mentioned in table CEKKO i.e. BSART.
then you have to do the value assignment. here you have to tick the check box for "NOT READY FOR INPUT".
JASH

I have tried everything I know to retrieve the iPhoto Library app. I detest this new Photo app, which obviously wasn't designed with photographers in mind. I desperately need help in retrieving the old app and have not been able to do it so far.

I have tried everything I know to retrieve the iPhoto Library app. I detest this new Photo app, which obviously wasn't designed with photographers in mind. I desperately need help in retrieving the old app and have not been able to do it so far. I have gone to my app folder and tried to update my iPhoto Library. I have gone to my trash and brought it over to my desktop and still cannot use it. Please help!

Try this fix discovered by User photosb189:
From Finder, hold down the option key on your keyboard and click on the Go menu at the top of the screen
Select Library from the drop down menu
Then navigate to Application Support > iLifeAssetManagement > assets
Right click on the 'sub' folder and choose Compress
Drag the resulting zip file to your Desktop (as a backup)
Go to your System Preferences and choose iCloud
Turn OFF the iCloud Photos option
Go back to Library > Application Support and DELETE the iLifeAssetManagement folder
Now, in System Preferences, turn the iCloud Photos option ON
iPhoto should now be able to launch. Give it enough time to re-download your Photo Stream content. if you are missing any of your My Photo Stream photos (more than 30 days old), unzip the sub folder on your desktop and drag that into iPhoto.

How to master good design with EJB and JSP?

I use JSP to calling EJB. But the .jsp file is complex and it's difficult to maintain...I just want to work higher efficent with EJB,JSP and JavaBean. I want to know is there a good design with EJB and JSP? and is there any good material about MVC for EJB,JSP and JavaBean?

You should read the J2EE blueprint available on this website. Better download the PDF, and print it for yourself so you can read it anytime.

XI 2.0: HowTo connect Bus.-Systems with different Releases to XI (RFC-Ad.)

Hi,
can anybody help me solving this problem:
I have Business-Systems connected to XI by RFC-Adapter. Everything works fine. Now I want to upgrade some of these Business-Systems to a newer Release --> RFCs are changing! (For both Releases I have separate Developing-Systems)
Does the following work?
- Creating a new Product-Version
- Creating new Software-Component-Versions for the new Product-Version
- Creating Namespaces with the same names (as in the older Software-Component-Versions)
- Tools/Release-Takeover for every Software-Component
- Connecting Develop-System of the new Release to the new Software-Components (Interface-Import of RFCs)--> in the new Software-Components only new RFCs can be uploaded.
- Business-Systems with old Release keep connected with old Product-Version. Business-Systems with new Release are connected with new Product-Version.
Does it work? Is this the best approach or are there other possibilities?
Thanks in advance,
Max.

Hey
are u suppose to do an IDOC(R/3 system A)-Xi-IDOC(R/3 system B) scenario,of u have to collect IDOC's from both the R/3 systems and send it to a single file?
in any case u have to maintain separate Business system and logical system name for both R/3 systems
thanx
ahmad
Message was edited by:
Ahmad

Designing with CSS in Design View

Hey guys, I'm working on learning CSS. One problem I'm having
is that while I'm working on the code, what shows in the design
view in dreamweaver isn't the same, (not even close), to what it
looks like in any browser. For example the location of a div will
be totally different.
It seems like it would be very hard to design this way. Why
doesn't dreamweaver attempt to reflect what it looks like in one of
the browsers. Is this just the way it is when designing with css?
If so, how the heck do people do it? Do you just have to keep
previewing the site every time you change the css?
Using dreamweaver MX
thanks, mike

> Using dreamweaver MX
Sadly, that's the dullest knife in the drawer. Is it DMX6.0
or 6.1?
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"southdaytona" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:f08qoq$bed$[email protected]..
> Hey guys, I'm working on learning CSS. One problem I'm
having is that
> while
> I'm working on the code, what shows in the design view
in dreamweaver
> isn't the
> same, (not even close), to what it looks like in any
browser. For
> example the
> location of a div will be totally different.
>
> It seems like it would be very hard to design this way.
Why doesn't
> dreamweaver attempt to reflect what it looks like in one
of the browsers.
> Is
> this just the way it is when designing with css? If so,
how the heck do
> people
> do it? Do you just have to keep previewing the site
every time you change
> the
> css?
>
> Using dreamweaver MX
>
> thanks, mike
>

Designer with 8i release (8.1.6)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for